Scalpel versus electrosurgery for major abdominal incisions

Minimally Invasive Beaded Electrosurgical Dissectors, Basic Science, and Pilot Studies

Background

Minimally invasive beaded electrosurgical dissectors ("BEED devices") provide simultaneous sharp dissection, blunt dissection, and electrosurgical coagulation while performing 100 cm2 porcine tissue plane dissections in 0.8 to 3 min with minimal bleeding and no perforations.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to report the basic science and potential clinical applications and to video document the speed and quality of planar dissections in in vivo and ex vivo porcine models with thermal damage quantified by thermal and histopathologic measurements. Additionally, in vivo porcine specimens were followed for 90 days to show whether adverse events occurred on a gross or macroscopic basis, as evidenced by photography, videography, physical examination, and dual ultrasonography.

Methods

Ex vivo porcine models were subjected to 20, 30, and 50 W in single-stroke passages with BEED dissectors (granted FDA 510(k) clearance (K233002)) with multichannel thermocouple, 3 s delay recordation combined with matching hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histopathology. In vivo porcine models were subjected to eight 10 × 10 cm dissections in each of 2 subjects at 20, 30, and 50 W and evaluated periodically until 90 days, wherein histopathology for H&E, collagen, and elastin was taken plus standard and Doppler ultrasounds prior to euthanasia.

Results

Five to 8 mm width dissectors were passed at 1 to 2 cm/s in ex vivo models (1-10 cm/s in vivo models) with an average temperature rise of 5°C at 50 W. Clinically evidenced seromas occurred in the undressed, unprotected wounds, and resolved well prior to 90 days, as documented by ultrasounds and histopathology.

Conclusions

In vivo and ex vivo models demonstrated thermal values that were below levels known to damage subcutaneous adipose tissue or skin. Tissue histopathology confirmed healing parameters while Doppler ultrasound demonstrated normal blood flow in posttreatment tissues.

Level of Evidence 4

Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery

Background

Due to the sensitivity of the surgical site and a higher probability of injury, the use of a scalpel and electrocautery to create an incision in the spine is discussed. In this study, we will compare the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery.

Materials and methods

This study was conducted in Iran as a randomized controlled trial with double-blinding (1,401). Sixty candidates for spine surgery were randomly divided into two groups of 30 using electrocautery (A) and a scalpel (B) based on available sampling. The VAS scale was used to assess postoperative pain. The duration of the incision and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. The infection and fluid secretions were determined using the Southampton scoring scale. Utilizing the Manchester scar scale, the wound healing status was evaluated. The SPSS version 16 software was used for data analysis (t-test, Mann-Whitney U, ANOVA).

Results

The electrocautery group had substantially lower bleeding, pain, and wound healing rates than the scalpel group (P > 0.05). However, the electrocautery group had significantly longer surgical times, more secretions, and a higher infection rate than the scalpel group (P > 0.05). In terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Electrocautery reduces postoperative hemorrhage and, potentially, postoperative pain in patients. However, as the duration of surgery increases, so does the duration of anesthesia, and patient safety decreases. Additionally, the risk of infection increases in the electrocautery group compared to the scalpel group, and the rate of wound healing decreases.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.irct.ir/, identifier (IRCT20230222057496N1).

Comparison of the Effects of High-Power Diode Laser and Electrocautery for Lingual Frenectomy in Infants: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The aim of the study was to evaluate the release of the lingual frenulum through frenectomy in newborns zero to 90 days of age who breastfed and had diagnosis of ankyloglossia with an indication for surgery, comparing two methods: electrocautery and a high-power diode laser. Fifty-seven patients were randomly allocated to two groups (23 submitted to electrocautery and 34 submitted to a high power diode laser). Tongue movements were evaluated based on a clinical assessment and using the Bristol Tongue Assessment Tool (BTAT) before and 15 days after the surgical procedures. The visual analog scale was administered to the mothers on the same occasions for the measurement of pain during breastfeeding. Both groups had an increased BTAT score (favorable outcome) at the post-surgical evaluation, but the anterior third of the tongue was not always free to enable the movements necessary for lingual functions. It is fundamental for surgeons to have skill and in-depth knowledge of the equipment used to avoid accidents and complications in the region of important structures. Both techniques employed in this study were safe and effective, causing little bleeding and few postoperative complications. The group submitted to a high-power diode laser exhibited less post-surgical bleeding compared to the group submitted to electrocautery and no inflammation at the edges of the surgical cut.

Histologic and Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Radiosurgery in Strabismus Surgery in a Rabbit Model

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of monopolar radiosurgery (MRS) assisted strabismus surgery and to compare its histologic and immunohistochemical wound healing outcomes with conventional surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Superior rectus muscle resection was performed on 30 white rabbits with three different surgical muscle cutting techniques: monopolar radiosurgery (MRS group), conventional scissors preceded by bipolar electrocautery (BEC group), and conventional scissors with no cauterization (control group). Degree of tissue injury, bleeding, inflammation, and fibrosis, as well as wound healing rate (CD68+ cell number), were evaluated.

RESULTS

In CS group, hemorrhage scores were significantly higher than those in the other groups (MRS group: Z = 5.182; p < 0.001 and BEC group: Z = 4.463; p < 0.001) and MRS group had lower scores than BEC group; however, the difference was not significant (Z = 1.423; p = 0.211). The tissue injury score in BEC group was higher when compared with MRS, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.028). Median inflammation scores at days 1 and 21 were lowest in MRS group, but the difference was not statistically significant among groups (day 1; p = 0.115, day 21; p = 0.095). The median fibrosis score was higher in the control group, when compared with MRS, and the difference was statistically significant (muscle-sclera; p = 0.011 and muscle-conjunctiva: p = 0.003). The macrophage score (number of CD68+ cells) was lowest in CS group; however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.657).

CONCLUSIONS

Monopolar radiosurgery is a novel method for strabismus surgery and provides equivalent hemostasis effects and wound healing properties, compared with conventional methods, and enhances surgeon comfort, as muscle incisions are made in one step with clean surgical area.

Effect of different surgical methods in the mouse embryo transfer: Electrosurgery versus cold surgical technique effects on repeated use of surrogate mothers, pregnancy rate and post-surgical behavior

Using the cold surgical technique (CST) is the most common practice to accomplish embryo transfer (ET). However, it can lead to uncontrolled bleeding and mortality in laboratory animals. Electrosurgery technique (EST) has provided the opportunity to prevent such complications. This study was aimed to evaluate CST versus EST in terms of repeated use of surrogate mothers, litter size, implantation rate and post-surgical behavior. Virgin female NMRI mice were allocated into two different surgical groups (n = 40): 1) CST-ET (control) and 2) EST-ET. Results showed that the first ET in EST-ET and CST-ET groups did not affect litter size, pregnancy rate and survival of surrogate mothers. Following the second and the third ETs, litter size was significantly affected through CST compared to EST, pregnancy rate and survival of surrogate mothers. Litter size, pregnancy rate and surrogate mothers survival rate did not show any significant reduction following the first and the second ETs in EST group. On the other hand, the third ET showed dramatic reduction for all aforementioned parameters regardless of the chosen surgical method for ET. Mice in EST-ET group did not show any significant change in their behavior indicating reduced well-being during the first 24 hr following the first, the second and the third ETs compared to CST-ET group. In conclusion, using EST for ET in mouse made it feasible to reuse surrogate mothers with minimum animal mortality; this could be pivotal with regard to reproductive and animal welfare aspects and research costs. Also, the results indicated that bleeding has severe diverse effects on ET efficiency.

Comparative healing of swine skin following incisions with different surgical devices

Background

Electrosurgical technology is widely used in surgical dissection and hemostasis, but the generated heat creates thermal injury to adjacent tissues and delays wound healing. The plasma blade (PB) applies pulsed radiofrequency (RF) to generate electrical plasma along the edge of a thin, flat, insulated electrode, minimizing collateral tissue damage. This study aimed to evaluate wound healing in swine skin following incision with a new surgical system that applies low-temperature plasma (NTS-100), a foreign PB, conventional electrosurgery (ES), and a scalpel blade.

Methods

In vitro porcine skin and an in vivo porcine skin model were used in this study. Full-thickness skin incisions 3 cm in length were made on the dorsum of each animal for each of the 5 surgical procedures at 0, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days. The timing of the surgical procedures allowed for wound-healing data points at 1, 2, 3, and 6 weeks accordingly. Local operating temperature and blood loss were quantified. Wounds were harvested at designated time points, tested for wound tensile strength, and examined histologically for scar formation and tissue damage.

Results

Local operating temperature was reduced significantly with NTS-100 (cut mode 83.12±23.55 °C; coagulation mode 90.07±10.6 °C) compared with PB (cut mode 94.46±11.48 °C; coagulation mode 100.23±6.58 °C, P<0.05) and ES (cut mode 208.99±34.33 °C, P<0.01; coagulation mode 233.37±28.69 °C, P<0.01) in vitro. Acute thermal damage from NTS-100 was significantly less than ES incisions (cut mode: 247.345±42.274 versus 495.295±103.525 µm, P<0.01; coagulation mode: 351.419±127.948 versus 584.516±31.708 µm, P<0.05). Bleeding, histological scoring of injury, and wound strength were equivalent for the NTS-100 and PB incisions.

Conclusions

The local operating temperature of NTS-100 was lower than PB, and NTS-100 had similarly reliable safety and efficacy.

Pilonidal sinus disease: Preliminary case-control study on heat-related wound dehiscence

Background

Pilonidal disease is a morbid condition of the young population, that could impair quality of life with a high cost for the health care system. No consensus exists on optimal surgical treatment, even if several techniques have been proposed. In this preliminary case-control study we compared excision by knife and diathermy to investigate if wound dehiscence could be related to heat spreading during excision of the sinus.

Materials and method

Between January 2017 and February 2018, 29 patients underwent to sinus excision.16 patients underwent sinus excision by diathermy (named “Hot” group, case-group) while 13 patients underwent excision by the knife as the control group (named “Cold” group). The temperature data were recorded for both groups. Were considered primary and secondary outcomes.

Results

the cold group has worse outcomes in operative time and blood loss, but better results in post-operative pain at first day and first control, number of weekly and total dressings until healing, time for full wound recovery, days to return to work, patient feeling feedback and scar aspect. Wounds healed within 8–12 days were 84.6% in the Cold group and 18.8% in the Hot one. I° Dindo-Clavien complications were respectively 15.4% and 100.0% for the Cold and Hot group. No differences were recorded for II° Dindo-Clavien complications and in days of hospitalization.

Conclusion

cold excision of the sinus pilonidalis has better results both in terms of precarious healing and quality of life, probably because the tissues are not subjected to diathermocoagulation damage and therefore the healing occurs more quickly. (United States National Institutes of Health, www.clinicaltrial.gov, number NCT 03764657, www.researchregistry.com UIN 5003).

•

Pilonidal sinus disease.

•

Cold and Hot surgical procedures.

•

Wounds healed within 8–12 days were 84.6% in the Cold group and 18.8% in the Hot one. I° Dindo-Clavien complications were 15.4% for the Cold and 100.0% for the Hot group.

Intraoperative interventions for preventing surgical site infection: an overview of Cochrane Reviews

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) rates vary from 1% to 5% in the month following surgery. Due to the large number of surgical procedures conducted annually, the costs of these SSIs can be considerable in financial and social terms. Many interventions are used with the aim of reducing the risk of SSI in people undergoing surgery. These interventions can be broadly delivered at three stages: preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. The intraoperative interventions are largely focused on decontamination of skin using soap and antiseptics; the use of barriers to prevent movement of micro-organisms into incisions; and optimising the patient's own bodily functions to promote best recovery. Both decontamination and barrier methods can be aimed at people undergoing surgery and operating staff. Other interventions focused on SSI prevention may be aimed at the surgical environment and include methods of theatre cleansing and approaches to managing theatre traffic.

OBJECTIVES

To present an overview of Cochrane Reviews of the effectiveness and safety of interventions, delivered during the intraoperative period, aimed at preventing SSIs in all populations undergoing surgery in an operating theatre.

METHODS

Published Cochrane systematic reviews reporting the effectiveness of interventions delivered during the intraoperative period in terms of SSI prevention were eligible for inclusion in this overview. We also identified Cochrane protocols and title registrations for future inclusion into the overview. We searched the Cochrane Library on 01 July 2017. Two review authors independently screened search results and undertook data extraction and 'Risk of bias' and certainty assessment. We used the ROBIS (risk of bias in systematic reviews) tool to assess the quality of included reviews, and we used GRADE methods to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. We summarised the characteristics of included reviews in the text and in additional tables.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 32 Cochrane Reviews in this overview: we judged 30 reviews as being at low risk of bias and two at unclear risk of bias. Thirteen reviews had not been updated in the past three years. Two reviews had no relevant data to extract. We extracted data from 30 reviews with 349 included trials, totaling 73,053 participants. Interventions assessed included gloving, use of disposable face masks, patient oxygenation protocols, use of skin antiseptics for hand washing and patient skin preparation, vaginal preparation, microbial sealants, methods of surgical incision, antibiotic prophylaxis and methods of skin closure. Overall, the GRADE certainty of evidence for outcomes was low or very low. Of the 77 comparisons providing evidence for the outcome of SSI, seven provided high- or moderate-certainty evidence, 39 provided low-certainty evidence and 31 very low-certainty evidence. Of the nine comparisons that provided evidence for the outcome of mortality, five provided low-certainty evidence and four very low-certainty evidence.There is high- or moderate-certainty evidence for the following outcomes for these intraoperative interventions. (1) Prophylactic intravenous antibiotics administered before caesarean incision reduce SSI risk compared with administration after cord clamping (10 trials, 5041 participants; risk ratio (RR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.81; high-certainty evidence - assessed by review authors). (2) Preoperative antibiotics reduce SSI risk compared with placebo after breast cancer surgery (6 trials, 1708 participants; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.98; high-certainty evidence - assessed by overview authors). (3) Antibiotic prophylaxis probably reduce SSI risk in caesarean sections compared with no antibiotics (82 relevant trials, 14,407 participants; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.46; moderate-certainty evidence; downgraded once for risk of bias - assessed by review authors). (4) Antibiotic prophylaxis probably reduces SSI risk for hernia repair compared with placebo or no treatment (17 trials, 7843 participants; RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.84; moderate-certainty evidence; downgraded once for risk of bias - assessed by overview authors); (5) There is currently no clear difference in the risk of SSI between iodine-impregnated adhesive drapes compared with no adhesive drapes (2 trials, 1113 participants; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.60; moderate-certainty evidence; downgraded once for imprecision - assessed by review authors); (6) There is currently no clear difference in SSI risk between short-term compared with long-term duration antibiotics in colorectal surgery (7 trials; 1484 participants; RR 1.05 95% CI 0.78 to 1.40; moderate-certainty evidence; downgraded once for imprecision - assessed by overview authors). There was only one comparison showing negative effects associated with the intervention: adhesive drapes increase the risk of SSI compared with no drapes (5 trials; 3082 participants; RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.48; high-certainty evidence - rated by review authors).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This overview provides the most up-to-date evidence on use of intraoperative treatments for the prevention of SSIs from all currently published Cochrane Reviews. There is evidence that some interventions are useful in reducing SSI risk for people undergoing surgery, such as antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section and hernia repair, and also the timing of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics administered before caesarean incision. Also, there is evidence that adhesive drapes increase SSI risk. Evidence for the many other treatment choices is largely of low or very low certainty and no quality-of-life or cost-effectiveness data were reported. Future trials should elucidate the relative effects of some treatments. These studies should focus on increasing participant numbers, using robust methodology and being of sufficient duration to adequately assess SSI. Assessment of other outcomes such as mortality might also be investigated as part of non-experimental prospective follow-up of people with SSI of different severity, so the risk of death for different subgroups can be better understood.