Second cancer risk after radiation therapy of ependymoma using the flattening filter free irradiation mode of a linear accelerator

Comparison of the dose distribution of the VMAT radiotherapy technique depending on the beam used: FFF-X10MV and FFF-X15MV

Background

The aim of the study was to answer the question of whether flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams can be used alternately in the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment technique, regardless of the size of the irradiated volume [small (S) or large (L) planning target volume (PTV)].

Materials and methods

Two groups of patients were examined: a group with a S-PTV-laryngeal cancer and a group with a L-PTV - gynecological volume. For each patient, two treatment plans were made for beams (energies): FFF-X10MV and FF-X15MV. Then, a statistical analysis, nonparametric test, and independent groups were performed, comparing the beams' impact on the analyzed treatment plans.

Results

In the case of laryngeal irradiation (S-PTV), there are no statistically significant differences between the energy used and the assessed parameters of the plan. In the case of gynecological volume (L-PTV), only statistically significant differences were noted for the number of monitor units depending on the energy used. For a large irradiated volume (gynecological case), the use of FFF beams increases the number of monitor units by 39,4% in relation to the FF beam.

Conclusions

In the case of gynecological neoplasms, statistically significant differences were found in the number of monitor units. Therefore, in the case of irradiation of L-PTV, it is recommended that flattening-filtering beams are used due to the smaller number of monitors. In the case of S-PTV, no statistically significant differences were found between the types of beams used (FF or FFF) and the treatment plan parameters analyzed in the study.

Effects of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams on small-field and large-field dose distribution using the VMAT treatment plan

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams on small-field and large-field dose distribution using the VMAT treatment plan.

Material and methods: Dose distribution calculations were performed for the VMAT technique in two locations: the larynx (small irradiation field; average 30.1 cm2) and gynecology (large irradiation field; average 173.1 cm2) using X-6MV flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams. The following values were compared: the number of monitor units, minimum doses, average doses in PTV and maximum average doses in OaR (spinal cord – in larynx radiotherapy, bladder and rectum - in gynecological radiotherapy) and RPI (Radiation Planning Index) coefficient.

Results and Discussion: The performed statistical tests indicate that there is a significant difference (p <0.05) between the number of monitor units in the irradiation of large (gynecological) fields between the FF and FFF beams. The dose distributions show no statistically significant differences between the flattening filter and flattening-free filter beams (regardless of the field size).

Conclusions: Due to the smaller number of monitor units, it is recommended to use flattening filter beams (FF) for large-field radiotherapy.

Secondary malignancy risk for patients with localized prostate cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy with and without flattening filter

Men treated for localized prostate cancer by radiotherapy have often a remaining life span of 10 yr or more. Therefore, the risk for secondary malignancies should be taken into account. Plans for ten patients were evaluated which had been performed on an Oncentra® treatment planning system for a treatment with an Elekta Synergy™ linac with Agility™ head. The investigated techniques involved IMRT and VMTA with and without flattening filter. Different dose response models were applied for secondary carcinoma and sarcoma risk in the treated region and also in the periphery. As organs at risk we regarded for carcinoma risk urinary bladder, rectum, colon, esophagus, thyroid, and for sarcoma risk bone and soft tissue. The excess absolute risk (EAR) was found very similar in the treated region for both techniques (IMRT and VMAT) and also for both with and without flattening filter. The secondary sarcoma risk resulted about one magnitude smaller than the secondary carcinoma risk. The EAR to the peripheral organs was statistically significant reduced by application of the flattening filter free mode concerning the flattening filter as main source of scattered dose. Application of flattening filter free mode can thus support to reduce second malignancy risk for patients with localized prostate cancer.

The influence of radiotherapy techniques on the plan quality and on the risk of secondary tumors in patients with pituitary adenoma

Background

This planning study compares different radiotherapy techniques for patients with pituitary adenoma, including flatness filter free mode (FFF), concerning plan quality and secondary malignancies for potentially young patients. The flatness filter has been described as main source of photon scatter.

Material and methods

Eleven patients with pituitary adenoma were included. An Elekta Synergy™ linac was used in the treatment planning system Oncentra® and for the measurements. 3D plans, IMRT, and VMAT plans and non-coplanar varieties were considered. The plan quality was evaluated regarding homogeneity, conformity, delivery time and dose to the organs at risk. The secondary malignancy risk was calculated from dose volume data and from measured dose to the periphery using different models for carcinoma and sarcoma risk.

Results

The homogeneity and conformity were nearly unchanged with and without flattening filter, neither was the delivery time found substantively different. VMAT plans were more homogenous, conformal and faster in delivery than IMRT plans. The secondary cancer risk was reduced with FFF both in the treated region and in the periphery. VMAT plans resulted in a higher secondary brain cancer risk than IMRT plans, but the risk for secondary peripheral cancer was reduced. Secondary sarcoma risk plays a minor role. No advantage was found for non-coplanar techniques. The FFF delivery times were not shortened due to additional monitor units needed and technical limitations. The risk for secondary brain cancer seems to depend on the irradiated volume. Secondary sarcoma risk is much smaller than carcinoma risk in accordance to the results of the atomic bomb survivors. The reduction of the peripheral dose and resulting secondary malignancy risk for FFF is statistically significant. However, it is negligible in comparison to the risk in the treated region.

Conclusion

Treatments with FFF can reduce secondary malignancy risk while retaining similar quality as with flattening filter and should be preferred. VMAT plans show the best plan quality combined with lowest peripheral secondary malignancy risk, but highest level of second brain cancer risk. Taking this into account VMAT FFF seems the most advantageous technique for the treatment of pituitary adenomas with the given equipment.

Acceptable fetal dose using flattening filter-free volumetric arc therapy (FFF VMAT) in postoperative chemoradiotherapy of tongue cancer during pregnancy

Optimizing irradiation protocols for pregnant women is challenging, because there are few cases and a dearth of fetal dosimetry data. We cared for a 36-year-old pregnant woman with tongue cancer. Prior to treatment, we compared three intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques, including helical tomotherapy, volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), and flattening-filter free VMAT (FFF-VMAT) using treatment planning software. FFF-VMAT achieved the minimum fetal exposure and was selected as the optimal modality. We prescribed 66 Gy to the involved nodes, 60 Gy to the tumor bed and ipsilateral neck, and 54 Gy to the contralateral neck over 33 fractions. To confirm the out-of-field exposure per fraction, surface doses and the rectal dose were measured during FFF-VMAT delivery. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy was delivered using IMRT and a cisplatin regimen. Without any shielding, the total fetal dose was 0.03 Gy, within the limits established by the ICRP. A healthy girl was born vaginally at 37 weeks' gestation.