1
|
Chhabra AM, Snider JW, Kole AJ, Stock M, Holtzman AL, Press R, Wang CJ, Li H, Lin H, Shi C, McDonald M, Soike M, Zhou J, Sabouri P, Mossahebi S, Colaco R, Albertini F, Simone CB. Proton Therapy for Spinal Tumors: A Consensus Statement From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00507-8. [PMID: 39181272 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton beam therapy (PBT) plays an important role in the management of primary spine tumors. The purpose of this consensus statement was to summarize safe and optimal delivery of PBT for spinal tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee consisting of radiation oncologists and medical physicists with specific expertise in spinal irradiation developed expert recommendations discussing treatment planning considerations and current approaches in the treatment of primary spinal tumors. RESULTS Computed tomography simulation: factors that require significant consideration include (1) patient comfort, (2) setup reproducibility and stability, and (3) accessibility of appropriate beam angles. SPINE STABILIZATION HARDWARE If present, hardware should be placed with cross-links well above/below the level of the primary tumor to reduce the metal burden at the level of the tumor bed. New materials that can reduce uncertainties include polyether-ether-ketone and composite polyether-ether-ketone-carbon fiber implants. FIELD ARRANGEMENT Appropriate beam selection is required to ensure robust target coverage and organ at risk sparing. Commonly, 2 to 4 treatment fields, typically from posterior and/or posterior-oblique directions, are used. TREATMENT PLANNING METHODOLOGY Robust optimization is recommended for all pencil beam scanning plans (the preferred treatment modality) and should consider setup uncertainty (between 3 and 7 mm) and range uncertainty (3%-3.5%). In the presence of metal hardware, use of an increased range uncertainty up to 5% is recommended. CONCLUSIONS The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee has developed recommendations to enable centers to deliver PBT safely and effectively for the management of primary spinal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpit M Chhabra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York.
| | - James W Snider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, South Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Delray Beach, Florida
| | - Adam J Kole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Markus Stock
- Department of Medical Physics, EBG MedAustron, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Robert Press
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - C Jake Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - Chengyu Shi
- Department of Medical Physics, City of Hope, Irvine, California
| | - Mark McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michael Soike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Pouya Sabouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Sina Mossahebi
- Department of Medical Physics, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rovel Colaco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Francesca Albertini
- Department of Medical Physics, Paul Scherrer Institut, Würenlingen, Switzerland
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bălan C, Granja C, Mytsin G, Shvidky S, Molokanov A, Marek L, Chiș V, Oancea C. Particle tracking, recognition and LET evaluation of out-of-field proton therapy delivered to a phantom with implants. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:165006. [PMID: 38986478 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad61b8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
Objective.This study aims to assess the composition of scattered particles generated in proton therapy for tumors situated proximal to some titanium (Ti) dental implants. The investigation involves decomposing the mixed field and recording Linear Energy Transfer (LET) spectra to quantify the influence of metallic dental inserts located behind the tumor.Approach.A therapeutic conformal proton beam was used to deliver the treatment plan to an anthropomorphic head phantom with two types of implants inserted in the target volume (made of Ti and plastic, respectively). The scattered radiation resulted during the irradiation was detected by a hybrid semiconductor pixel detector MiniPIX Timepix3 that was placed distal to the Spread-out Bragg peak. Visualization and field decomposition of stray radiation were generated using algorithms trained in particle recognition based on artificial intelligence neural networks (AI NN). Spectral sensitive aspects of the scattered radiation were collected using two angular positions of the detector relative to the beam direction: 0° and 60°.Results.Using AI NN, 3 classes of particles were identified: protons, electrons & photons, and ions & fast neutrons. Placing a Ti implant in the beam's path resulted in predominantly electrons and photons, contributing 52.2% of the total number of detected particles, whereas for plastic implants, the contribution was 65.4%. Scattered protons comprised 45.5% and 31.9% with and without metal inserts, respectively. The LET spectra were derived for each group of particles identified, with values ranging from 0.01 to 7.5 keVμm-1for Ti implants/plastic implants. The low-LET component was primarily composed of electrons and photons, while the high-LET component corresponded to protons and ions.Significance.This method, complemented by directional maps, holds the potential for evaluating and validating treatment plans involving stray radiation near organs at risk, offering precise discrimination of the mixed field, and enhancing in this way the LET calculation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Bălan
- Faculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Oncology Institute 'Prof. Dr Ion Chiricuta', Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Gennady Mytsin
- International Intergovernmental Organization Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR), Dubna, Russia
| | - Sergey Shvidky
- International Intergovernmental Organization Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR), Dubna, Russia
| | - Alexander Molokanov
- International Intergovernmental Organization Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR), Dubna, Russia
| | | | - Vasile Chiș
- Faculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumar N, Hui SJ, Lee R, Athia S, Rothenfluh DA, Tan JH. Implant and construct decision-making in metastatic spine tumour surgery: a review of current concepts with a decision-making algorithm. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:1899-1910. [PMID: 38289374 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07987-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative Review. OBJECTIVE Metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS) is an important treatment modality of metastatic spinal disease (MSD). Increase in MSTS has been due to improvements in our oncological treatment, as patients have increased longevity and even those with poorer comorbidities are now being considered for surgery. However, there is currently no guideline on how MSTS surgeons should select the appropriate levels to instrument, and which type of implants should be utilised. METHODS The current literature on MSTS was reviewed to study implant and construct decision making factors, with a view to write this narrative review. All studies that were related to instrumentation in MSTS were included. RESULTS A total of 58 studies were included in this review. We discuss novel decision-making models that should be taken into account when planning for surgery in patients undergoing MSTS. These factors include the quality of bone for instrumentation, the extent of the construct required for MSTS patients, the use of cement augmentation and the choice of implant. Various studies have advocated for the use of these modalities and demonstrated better outcomes in MSTS patients when used appropriately. CONCLUSION We have established a new instrumentation algorithm that should be taken into consideration for patients undergoing MSTS. It serves as an important guide for surgeons treating MSTS, with the continuous evolvement of our treatment capacity in MSD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naresh Kumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, Level 11, 1E Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
| | - Si Jian Hui
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, Level 11, 1E Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Renick Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, Level 11, 1E Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Sahil Athia
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, Level 11, 1E Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Dominique A Rothenfluh
- Centre for Spinal Surgery, CHUV University Hospital Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jiong Hao Tan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, Level 11, 1E Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sattari SA, Xia Y, Azad TD, Caraway CA, Chang L. Advances in Implant Technologies for Spine Surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2024; 35:217-227. [PMID: 38423737 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Spine implants are becoming increasingly diversified. Taking inspiration from other industries, three-dimensional modeling of the spinal column has helped meet the custom needs of individual patients as both en bloc replacements and pedicle screw designs. Intraoperative tailoring of devices, a common need in the operating room, has led to expandable versions of cages and interbody spacers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahab Aldin Sattari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yuanxuan Xia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tej D Azad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1800 Orleans Street, 6007 Zayed Tower, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Chad A Caraway
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Louis Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ho D, Corde S, Chen C, Saade G, Betteridge C, Mobbs R. The use of carbon fiber/polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) in pedicle screw fixation for spinal neoplasms-potential advantages in postoperative imaging and radiotherapy planning. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY (HONG KONG) 2024; 10:8-21. [PMID: 38567011 PMCID: PMC10982921 DOI: 10.21037/jss-23-93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Background Titanium pedicle screw fixation complicates postoperative care in patients with spinal neoplasms due to postoperative imaging artefacts and dose perturbation. This study aims to measure the benefits of using carbon fiber/polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) pedicle fixation compared to titanium in postoperative imaging, radiotherapy planning and delivery for spinal neoplasms treated with conventional external beam radiotherapy with a commercial treatment planning system. Methods The properties of CF/PEEK pedicle fixation systems were compared to titanium in radiotherapy dose planning accuracy and postoperative computed tomography (CT) image quality. Dose profiles through the screw, tulip and longitudinal axis of the screw were acquired with radiochromic films and compared to a collapsed cone algorithm simulation, to measure dose agreement. The image quality of postoperative CTs were compared by defining four regions of interest around the vertebrae and screws in water phantom models and previous planning CTs, and comparing calculated artefact indexes (AIs). Results CF/PEEK screws have non-inferior dosimetric prediction accuracy up to 50 mm beneath the screw for collapsed-cone algorithm planning systems. There is a statistically significant reduction in the absolute difference between calculated and measured dose at a depth of 2 mm beneath the screw. There is minimal attenuation with CF/PEEK relative to the surrounding dose, extending to 50 mm beneath the screw. There is a statistically significant improvement in CT imaging quality with reduced AIs in CF/PEEK fixation compared to titanium in both model and patient CT plans. Conclusions CF/PEEK pedicle fixation can provide benefits in postoperative imaging and photon radiotherapy planning and delivery to patients with spinal neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ho
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- NeuroSpine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, Australia
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephanie Corde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, SydneyAustralia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Colin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, SydneyAustralia
| | - George Saade
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, SydneyAustralia
| | - Callum Betteridge
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- NeuroSpine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, Australia
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia
| | - Ralph Mobbs
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- NeuroSpine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, Australia
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sacino AN, Chen H, Sahgal A, Bettegowda C, Rhines LD, Maralani P, Redmond KJ. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases: A new standard of care. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S76-S87. [PMID: 38437670 PMCID: PMC10911798 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Advancements in systemic therapies for patients with metastatic cancer have improved overall survival and, hence, the number of patients living with spinal metastases. As a result, the need for more versatile and personalized treatments for spinal metastases to optimize long-term pain and local control has become increasingly important. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been developed to meet this need by providing precise and conformal delivery of ablative high-dose-per-fraction radiation in few fractions while minimizing risk of toxicity. Additionally, advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques have also greatly improved care for patients with epidural disease and/or unstable spines, which may then be combined with SBRT for durable local control. In this review, we highlight the indications and controversies of SBRT along with new surgical techniques for the treatment of spinal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda N Sacino
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Laurence D Rhines
- Department of Neurosurgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation and Molecular Oncology, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nemoto H, Saito M, Suzuki T, Suzuki H, Sano N, Mochizuki Z, Mochizuki K, Ueda K, Komiyama T, Marino K, Aoki S, Oguri M, Takahashi H, Onishi H. Evaluation of computed tomography metal artifact and CyberKnife fiducial recognition for novel size fiducial markers. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14142. [PMID: 37672211 PMCID: PMC10691645 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare fiducial markers used in CyberKnife treatment in terms of metal artifact intensity observed in CT images and fiducial recognition in the CyberKnife system affected by patient body thickness and type of marker. METHODS Five markers, ACCULOC 0.9 mm × 3 mm, Ball type Gold Anchor (GA) 0.28 mm × 10 mm, 0.28 mm × 20 mm, and novel size GA 0.4 mm × 10 mm, 0.4 mm × 20 mm were evaluated. To evaluate metal artifacts of CT images, two types of CT images of water-equivalent gels with each marker were acquired using Aquilion LB CT scanner, one applied SEMAR (SEMAR-on) and the other did not apply this technique (SEMAR-off). The evaluation metric of artifact intensity (MSD ) which represents a variation of CT values were compared for each marker. Next, 5, 15, and 20 cm thickness of Tough Water (TW) was placed on the gel under the condition of overlapping the vertebral phantom in the Target Locating System, and the live image of each marker was acquired to compare fiducial recognition. RESULTS The mean MSD of SEMAR-off was 78.80, 74.50, 97.25, 83.29, and 149.64 HU for ACCULOC, GA0.28 mm × 10 mm, 20 mm, and 0.40 mm × 10 mm, 20 mm, respectively. In the same manner, that of SEMAR-on was 23.52, 20.26, 26.76, 24.89, and 33.96 HU, respectively. Fiducial recognition decreased in the order of 5, 15, and 20 cm thickness, and GA 0.4 × 20 mm showed the best recognition at thickness of 20 cm TW. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated the potential to reduce metal artifacts in the CT image to the same level for all the markers we evaluated by applying SEMAR. Additionally, the fiducial recognition of each marker may vary depending on the thickness of the patient's body. Particularly, we showed that GA 0.40 × 20 mm may have more optimal recognition for CyberKnife treatment in cases of high bodily thickness in comparison to the other markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikaru Nemoto
- Department of Advanced Biomedical ImagingUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
| | - Masahide Saito
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
| | | | - Hidekazu Suzuki
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
| | - Naoki Sano
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
| | | | - Koji Mochizuki
- Kasugai CyberKnife Rehabilitation HospitalYamanashiJapan
| | - Koji Ueda
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
| | | | - Kan Marino
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
| | - Shinichi Aoki
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
| | - Mitsuhiko Oguri
- Department of RadiologyShizuoka General HospitalShizuokaJapan
| | | | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Avallone C, Bonosi L, Tumbiolo S, Iacopino DG, Maugeri R. Letter to the Editor Regarding: "The Use of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Instrumentation in Patients with Spinal Oncologic Tumors: A Systematic Review of Literature and Future Directions". World Neurosurg 2023; 178:283-285. [PMID: 37803674 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Avallone
- Neurosurgical Clinic, AOUP "Paolo Giaccone", Post Graduate Residency Program in Neurosurgery, Department of Biomedicine Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), School of Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Lapo Bonosi
- Neurosurgical Clinic, AOUP "Paolo Giaccone", Post Graduate Residency Program in Neurosurgery, Department of Biomedicine Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), School of Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
| | | | - Domenico Gerardo Iacopino
- Neurosurgical Clinic, AOUP "Paolo Giaccone", Post Graduate Residency Program in Neurosurgery, Department of Biomedicine Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), School of Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Rosario Maugeri
- Neurosurgical Clinic, AOUP "Paolo Giaccone", Post Graduate Residency Program in Neurosurgery, Department of Biomedicine Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), School of Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu C, Cho Y, Magnelli A, Angelov L, Balagamwala EH, Chao ST, Xia P. The dosimetric impact of titanium implants in spinal SBRT using four commercial treatment planning algorithms. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14070. [PMID: 37540084 PMCID: PMC10562029 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the dosimetric impact of titanium implants in spine SBRT using four dose calculation algorithms. Twenty patients with titanium implants in the spine treated with SBRT without density override (DO) were selected. The clinical plan for each patient was created in Pinnacle and subsequently imported into Eclipse (AAA and AcurosXB) and Raystation (CC) for dose evaluation with and without DO to the titanium implant. We renormalized all plans such that 90% of the tumor volume received the prescription dose and subsequently evaluated the following dose metrics: (1) the maximum dose to 0.03 cc (Dmax), dose to 99% (D99%) and 90% (D90%) of the tumor volume; (2) Dmax and volumetric metrics of the spinal cord. For the same algorithm, plans with and without DO had similar dose distributions. Differences in Dmax, D99% and D90% of the tumor were on average <2% with slightly larger variations up to 5.58% in Dmax using AcurosXB. Dmax of the spinal cord for plans calculated with DO increased but the differences were clinically insignificant for all algorithms (mean: 0.36% ± 0.7%). Comparing to the clinical plans, the relative differences for all algorithms had an average of 1.73% (-10.36%-13.21%) for the tumor metrics and -0.93% (-9.87%-10.95%) for Dmax of the spinal cord. A few cases with small tumor and spinal cord volumes, dose differences of >10% in both D99% and Dmax of the tumor, and Dmax of the spinal cord were observed. For all algorithms, the presence of titanium implants in the spine for most patients had minimal impact on dose distributions with and without DO. For the same plan calculated with different algorithms, larger differences in volumetric metrics of >10% could be observed, impacted by dose gradient at the plan normalization volume, tumor volumes, plan complexity, and partial voxel volume interpolation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chieh‐Wen Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Young‐Bin Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Anthony Magnelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Ehsan H. Balagamwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Samuel T. Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Ping Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wolf RJ, Winkler V, Mattke M, Uhl M, Debus J. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the management of primary and recurrent chordomas: a retrospective long-term follow-up study. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:207-216. [PMID: 37456699 PMCID: PMC10348326 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chordomas have a high risk of recurrence. Radiotherapy (RT) is required as adjuvant therapy after resection. Sufficient radiation doses for local control (LC) can be achieved using either particle therapy, if this technology is available and feasible, or intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Materials and methods 57 patients (age, 11.8-81.6 years) with chordomas of the skull base, spine and pelvis who received photon radiotherapy between 1995 and 2017 were enrolled in the study. Patients were treated at the time of initial diagnosis (68.4%) or during recurrence (31.6%). 44 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy and 13 received definitive radiotherapy. The median total dose to the physical target volume was 70 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) (range: 54.7-82.5) in 22-36 fractions. Results LC was 76.4%, 58.4%, 46.7% and 39.9% and overall survival (OS) was 98.3%, 89%, 76.9% and 47.9% after 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively, with a median follow-up period of 6.5 years (range, 0.5-24.3 years). Age, dose and treatment concept (post-operative or definitive) were significant prognostic factors for OS. Primary treatment, macroscopic tumour at RT and size of the irradiated volume were statistically significant prognostic factors for LC. Conclusion Photon treatment is a safe and effective treatment for chordomas if no particle therapy is available. The best results can be achieved against primary tumours if the application of curative doses is possible due to organs at risk in direct proximity. We recommend high-dose radiotherapy, regardless of the resection status, as part of the initial treatment of chordoma, using the high conformal radiation technique if particle therapy is not feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J. Wolf
- University Hospital of Heidelberg, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Winkler
- Institute of Public Health, Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Mattke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwigshafen City Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- University Hospital of Heidelberg, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alvarez-Breckenridge C, de Almeida R, Haider A, Muir M, Bird J, North R, Rhines L, Tatsui C. Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Spinal Implants for Treatment of Spinal Tumors: Perceived Advantages and Limitations. Neurospine 2023; 20:317-326. [PMID: 37016879 PMCID: PMC10080433 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244920.460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Carbon-fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFRP)-based spinal implants are an alternative to titanium, offering less image artifact as their metallic counterparts while maintaining similar biomechanical and biocompatibility properties. Its use in the management of spinal tumors has been reported, however the perceived advantages related to improved imaging quality, radiation treatment planning, and detection of tumor recurrence have not been fully assessed.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of medical records amongst oncologic patients treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center with CFRP implants. Histology, tumor location, construct features, time of follow-up, adjuvant radiation, recurrences, overall survival, and hardware-related complications were recorded.Results: Sixty-nine consecutive patients were assessed (22 primary tumors, 47 metastases) and the median time for follow-up was 5.4 months. Amongst the cohort, a total of 491 CFRP pedicle screws were implanted. Hardware complications were observed in 5 cases (7.04%). Adjuvant radiation was completed in 8 patients with primary tumors and 29 patients with spinal metastases. A total of 28 patients (40.5%) from the combined primary and metastatic cohorts experienced systemic disease progression, with 12 patients (17.3%) demonstrating local recurrences. Amongst primary and metastatic tumors, overall survival (p = 0.363) and rate of local recurrence (p = 0.112) were similar.Conclusion: This largest series of CFRP implants demonstrates safe and effective spinal stabilization for patients with both primary and metastatic tumors. Enhanced postoperative imaging led to minimal imaging artifacts which facilitated postoperative radiation planning and the ability to detect local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Corresponding Author Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Room FC7.2000, Unit 442, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Romulo de Almeida
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ali Haider
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew Muir
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Justin Bird
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert North
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laurence Rhines
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Claudio Tatsui
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Clinical evaluation of vertebral body replacement of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone in patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:897-904. [PMID: 36820888 PMCID: PMC10068665 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05502-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiolucent anterior and posterior implants by carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR PEEK) aim to improve treatment of primary and secondary tumors of the spine during the last years. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes after dorsoventral instrumentation using a CFR PEEK implant in a cohort of patients representing clinical reality. METHODS A total of 25 patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine underwent vertebral body replacement (VBR) using an expandable CFR PEEK implant between January 2021 and January 2022. Patient outcome, complications, and radiographic follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS A consecutive series aged 65.8 ± 14.7 (27.6-91.2) years were treated at 37 vertebrae of tumor manifestation, including two cases (8.0%) of primary tumor as well as 23 cases (92.0%) of spinal metastases. Overall, 26 cages covering a median of 1 level (1-4) were implanted. Duration of surgery was 134 ± 104 (65-576) min, with a blood loss of 792 ± 785 (100-4000) ml. No intraoperative cage revision was required. Surgical complications were reported in three (12.0%) cases including hemothorax in two cases (one intraoperative, one postoperative) and atrophic wound healing disorder in one case. In two cases (8.0%), revision surgery was performed (fracture of the adjacent tumorous vertebrae, progressive construct failure regarding cage subsidence). No implant failure was observed. CONCLUSION VBR using CFR PEEK cages represents a legitimate surgical strategy which opens a variety of improvements-especially in patients in need of postoperative radiotherapy of the spine and MRI-based follow-up examinations.
Collapse
|
13
|
Depauw N, Pursley J, Lozano-Calderon SA, Patel CG. Evaluation of Carbon Fiber and Titanium Surgical Implants for Proton and Photon Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:256-262. [PMID: 36738918 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Impending and actual pathologic fractures secondary to metastatic bone disease, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma often require intramedullary fixation followed by radiation therapy. Because of carbon's low atomic number, there are reduced computed tomography (CT) imaging artifacts and dose perturbation when planning postoperative radiation for carbon fiber (CF) rods. Herein, we characterize the dosimetric properties of CF implants compared with titanium alloy (TA) for proton and photon. METHODS AND MATERIALS TA and CF samples were acquired from an implant manufacturer. Material characteristics were evaluated by CT scans with and without metal artifact reduction (MAR). Relative stopping power (RSP) was determined from the range pull-back of each sample in a 20-cm range proton beam. Photon transmission measurements were made in a solid water phantom and compared with the modeled dosimetry from the RayStation planning system. RESULTS CF caused no visible CT artifacts, and MAR was not necessary for Hounsfield unit (HU) determination (median, 364 HU) or contouring, whereas TA (median, 3071 HU) caused substantial artifacts, which were improved, but not eliminated by MAR. The proton RSP was measured as 3.204 for TA and 1.414 for CF. For 6 MV photons, the measured transmission was 89.3% for TA and 98% for CF. CF RSP calculation and transmission from CT HU showed a physical density overestimate compared with measurements, which would cause a slight, but acceptable, dose uncertainty (<10% proton range or 1% photon transmission). CONCLUSIONS With a density similar to bone, CF implants did not cause imaging artifacts and minimal dose perturbation compared with TA. Although the CF proton RSP is underestimated and the photon attenuation is overestimated by the HU, both effects are relatively small and may be most easily accounted for by planning with a 2-mm expansion around organs at risk beyond or in close proximity to the implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Depauw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Pursley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Santiago A Lozano-Calderon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chirayu G Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Newman WC, Bilsky MH. Fifty-year history of the evolution of spinal metastatic disease management. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:913-920. [PMID: 36087077 PMCID: PMC11268045 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Spine metastases are a significant source of morbidity in oncology. Treatment of these spine metastases largely remains palliative, but advances over the past 50 years have improved the effectiveness of interventions for preserving functional status and obtaining local control while minimizing morbidity. While the field began with conventional external beam radiation as the primary treatment modality, a series of paradigm shifts and technological advances in the 2000s led to a change in treatment patterns. These advances allowed for an increased role of surgical decompression of neural elements, a shift in the stereotactic capabilities of radiation oncologists, and an improved understanding of the radiobiology of metastatic disease. The result was improved local control while minimizing treatment morbidity. These advances fit within the larger framework of metastatic spine tumor management known as the Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanical, and Systemic disease decision framework. This dynamic framework takes into account the neurological function of the patient, the radiobiology of their tumor, their degree of mechanical instability, and their systemic disease control and treatment options to help determine appropriate interventions based on the individual patient. Herein, we describe the 50-year evolution of metastatic spine tumor management and the impact of various advances on the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Christopher Newman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark H Bilsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Andrew Katsifis G, McKenzie DR, Hill R, Connor MO, Milross C, Suchowerska N. Radiation dose perturbation at the tissue interface with PEEK and Titanium bone implants: Monte Carlo simulation, treatment planning and film dosimetry. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
16
|
Navigation accuracy and assessability of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK instrumentation with multimodal intraoperative imaging in spinal oncology. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15816. [PMID: 36138117 PMCID: PMC9500029 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20222-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiolucent carbon-fiber reinforced PEEK (CFRP) implants have helped improve oncological follow-up and radiation therapy. Here, we investigated the performance of 3D intraoperative imaging and navigation systems for instrumentation and precision assessment of CFRP pedicle screws across the thoraco-lumbar spine. Thirty-three patients with spinal tumors underwent navigated CFRP instrumentation with intraoperative CT (iCT), robotic cone-beam CT (rCBCT) or cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging. Two different navigation systems were used for iCT-/rCBCT- and CBCT-based navigation. Demographic, clinical and outcome data was assessed. Four blinded observers rated image quality, assessability and accuracy of CFRP pedicle screws. Inter-observer reliability was determined with Fleiss` Kappa analysis. Between 2018 and 2021, 243 CFRP screws were implanted (iCT:93, rCBCT: 99, CBCT: 51), of which 13 were non-assessable (iCT: 1, rCBCT: 9, CBCT: 3; *p = 0.0475; iCT vs. rCBCT). Navigation accuracy was highest using iCT (74%), followed by rCBCT (69%) and CBCT (49%) (*p = 0.0064; iCT vs. CBCT and rCBCT vs. CBCT). All observers rated iCT image quality higher than rCBCT/CBCT image quality (*p < 0.01) but relevant pedicle breaches were reliably identified with substantial agreement between all observers regardless of the imaging modality. Navigation accuracy for CFRP pedicle screws was considerably lower than expected from reports on titanium implants and CT may be best for reliable assessment of CFRP materials.
Collapse
|
17
|
Zavras AG, Schoenfeld AJ, Patt JC, Munim MA, Goodwin CR, Goodwin ML, Lo SFL, Redmond KJ, Tobert DG, Shin JH, Ferrone ML, Laufer I, Saifi C, Buchowski JM, Jennings JW, Ozturk AK, Huang-Wright C, Mesfin A, Steyn C, Hsu W, Soliman HM, Krishnaney AA, Sciubba DM, Schwab JH, Colman MW. Attitudes and trends in the use of radiolucent spinal implants: A survey of the North American Spine Society section of spinal oncology. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL (NASSJ) 2022; 10:100105. [PMID: 35368717 PMCID: PMC8967730 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background In spinal oncology, titanium implants pose several challenges including artifact on advanced imaging and therapeutic radiation perturbation. To mitigate these effects, there has been increased interest in radiolucent carbon fiber (CF) and CF-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) implants as an alternative for spinal reconstruction. This study surveyed the members of the North American Spine Society (NASS) section of Spinal Oncology to query their perspectives regarding the clinical utility, current practice patterns, and recommended future directions of radiolucent spinal implants. Methods In February 2021, an anonymous survey was administered to the physicians of the NASS section of Spinal Oncology. Participation in the survey was optional. The survey contained 38 items including demographic questions as well as multiple-choice, yes/no questions, Likert rating scales, and short free-text responses pertaining to the “clinical concept”, “efficacy”, “problems/complications”, “practice pattern”, and “future directions” of radiolucent spinal implants. Results Fifteen responses were received (71.4% response rate). Six of the participants (40%) were neurosurgeons, eight (53.3%) were orthopedic surgeons, and one was a spinal radiation oncologist. Overall, there were mixed opinions among the specialists. While several believed that radiolucent spinal implants provide substantial benefits for the detection of disease recurrence and radiation therapy options, others remained less convinced. Ongoing concerns included high costs, low availability, limited cervical and percutaneous options, and suboptimal screw and rod designs. As such, participants estimated that they currently utilize these implants for 27.3% of anterior and 14.7% of all posterior reconstructions after tumor resection. Conclusion A survey of the NASS section of Spinal Oncology found a lack of consensus with regards to the imaging and radiation benefits, and several ongoing concerns about currently available options. Therefore, routine utilization of these implants for anterior and posterior spinal reconstructions remains low. Future investigations are warranted to practically validate these devices’ theoretical risks and benefits.
Collapse
|
18
|
Katsifis GA, McKenzie DR, Suchowerska N. Monte Carlo calculations of radiotherapy dose distributions within and around orthopaedic implants. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 22:123-130. [PMID: 35619642 PMCID: PMC9127420 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Cancer patients often require a titanium orthopaedic implant to support or replace lost bone. In radiation treatment, the dose distribution is perturbed causing regions of high and low dose at material interfaces. Since the survival of integrating bone tissue is critical to implant success, the aim of this study was to determine the dose distribution in and around the scaffold, when constructed from titanium or Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK). Materials and methods The dose distributions in the pores and along boundaries for three implant scaffold designs were calculated using Monte-Carlo methods in Geant4/GATE, with the material taken as titanium or PEEK. The 3D dose distributions were analysed in MATLAB and segmented using image masks, yielding the dose distributions in key regions of interest. To evaluate the effect of the predicted dose perturbations, the cell survival was calculated using the linear-quadratic model for SAOS-2 cells (bone) using experimentally determined radiation response data. Results High dose gradients were found along the boundaries of the titanium implants, but not for the corresponding PEEK implants. The dose to the internal cavities of the titanium implants was enhanced by 10–15% near the proximal interface whereas for PEEK, there was no significant dose perturbation. The predicted perturbation caused by the titanium implant was shown to decrease the survival for SAOS-2 cells by 7% which was not found for the PEEK implants. Conclusion PEEK was shown to be a more favourable orthopaedic implant material over titanium for cancer patients considering radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
19
|
Shi C, Lin H, Huang S, Xiong W, Hu L, Choi I, Press R, Hasan S, Simone C, Chhabra A. Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) Spinal Hardware for Proton and Photon Planning. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21:15330338221091700. [PMID: 35410544 PMCID: PMC9009152 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221091700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate a novel spine implant, carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK), for proton and photon treatment planning. Materials and Methods: We compared target coverage and sparing of organs-at-risk (OARs) for a spinal phantom with 4 different spine configurations: (a) normal (no implant); (b) Titanium; (c) CFR-PEEK; and (d) hybrid (CFR-PEEK with Titanium tulip head). The spinal phantom was imaged via computed tomography (CT) scan, and the iterative Metal Artifact Reduction (iMAR) CT set was used for planning. A representative spinal chordoma target and associated OARs were contoured. The prescription dose was 50 Gy to the initial target volume, followed by a 24 Gy boost, for which multi-field optimization (MFO) proton plans were developed with a 3 mm setup and 3.5% range uncertainties. For photon planning, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were developed for the initial and boost plans. OAR dose constraints were set according to our institutional guidelines. Results: For the 4 spine configurations, the proton plans achieved similar nominal target coverage and OARs sparing. While evaluating coverage and OAR dose under uncertainty scenario analysis for initial clinical target volume (CTV) 50 Gy 95% and 90% coverage, higher means and the narrower band of doses variations were achieved for the normal and CFR-PEEK plans. Similarly, uncertainty analysis of spinal cord Dmax showed tighter distribution for normal and CFR-PEEK plans. Overall plan quality showed no significant difference for photon planning when compared to normal spine versus other inserts. However, for proton planning, there is a larger difference for the normal spine insert scenario versus the Titanium insert scenario. For each insert scenario comparison between photon and proton plans, there was a larger difference for OARs: heart and spinal cord. Conclusion: The CFR-PEEK implant has similar clinical properties to a normal spine for proton planning, allowing us to pass protons through the material and achieve superior target coverage and OAR sparing under nominal and uncertainty conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Lei Hu
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Le Fèvre C, Lacornerie T, Noël G, Antoni D. Management of metallic implants in radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:411-416. [PMID: 34955412 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The number of patients with metallic implant and treated with radiotherapy is constantly increasing. These hardware are responsible for the deterioration in the quality of the CT images used at each stage of the radiation therapy, during delineation, dosimetry and dose delivery. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on the pros and cons of the different methods, existing and under evaluation, which limit the impact of metallic implants on the quality and safety of radiation treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Le Fèvre
- Service de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, BP 23025, 67033 Strasbourg, France
| | - T Lacornerie
- Département de physique médicale, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| | - G Noël
- Service de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, BP 23025, 67033 Strasbourg, France; Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - D Antoni
- Service de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, BP 23025, 67033 Strasbourg, France; Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pennington Z, Ehresman J, Pittman PD, Ahmed AK, Lubelski D, McCarthy EF, Goodwin CR, Sciubba DM. Chondrosarcoma of the spine: a narrative review. Spine J 2021; 21:2078-2096. [PMID: 33971325 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Chondrosarcoma is an uncommon primary bone tumor with an estimated incidence of 0.5 per 100,000 patient-years. Primary chondrosarcoma of the mobile spine and sacrum cumulatively account for less than 20% of all cases, most .commonly causing patients to present with focal pain with or without radiculopathy, or myelopathy secondary to neural element compression. Because of the rarity, patients benefit from multidisciplinary care at academic tertiary-care centers. Current standard-of-care consists of en bloc surgical resection with negative margins; for high grade lesions adjuvant focused radiation with ≥60 gray equivalents is taking an increased role in improving local control. Prognosis is dictated by lesion grade at the time of resection. Several groups have put forth survival calculators and epidemiological evidence suggests prognosis is quite good for lesions receiving R0 resection. Future efforts will be focused on identifying potential chemotherapeutic adjuvants and refining radiation treatments as a means of improving local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Pennington
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA 55905; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287.
| | - Jeff Ehresman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287; Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ USA 85013.
| | - Patricia D Pittman
- Department of Neuropathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC USA 27710
| | - A Karim Ahmed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287
| | - Daniel Lubelski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287
| | - Edward F McCarthy
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC USA 27710
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA 21287; Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center and North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY USA 11030.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Murthy NK, Wolinsky JP. Utility of carbon fiber instrumentation in spinal oncology. Heliyon 2021; 7:e07766. [PMID: 34430744 PMCID: PMC8367799 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal oncology has had many advancements often necessitating serial imaging for post-surgical treatment planning and close follow up. Traditional spinal instrumentation introduces artifact into MRI and CT imaging, which can reduce the efficacy of follow up imaging and treatment. Newly created carbon-fiber instrumentation can offer many advantages compared to traditional instrumentation while typically maintaining biomechanical stability. The utility of this new instrumentation continues to evolve as more surgeons utilize these materials, which can improve patient outcomes. We illustrate the utility of this new hardware technology through various patient examples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil K Murthy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jean-Paul Wolinsky
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Takayanagi A, Siddiqi I, Ghanchi H, Lischalk J, Vrionis F, Ratliff J, Bilsky M, Hariri OR. Radiolucent Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Implants for Treatment of Spinal Tumors-Clinical, Radiographic, and Dosimetric Considerations. World Neurosurg 2021; 152:61-70. [PMID: 34062294 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The management of spine tumors is multimodal and personalized to each individual patient. Patients often require radiation therapy after surgical fixation. Although titanium implants are used most commonly, they produce significant artifact, leading to decreased confidence in target-volume coverage and normal tissue sparing. Carbon-based materials have been found to have minimal effects on dose perturbation in postoperative radiation therapy and have shown biostability and biocompatibility that are comparable to titanium implants. Using the PubMed and Web of Sciences databases, we conducted a systematic review of carbon-based screw and rod fixation systems in the treatment of spinal tumors. We reviewed clinical studies regarding safety of spine fixation with carbon fiber-reinforced (CFR) implants and biomechanical studies, as well as radiation and dosimetric studies. The radiolucency of CFR-polyether ether ketone implants has the potential to benefit patients with spine tumor. Clinical studies have shown no increase in complications with implementation of CFR-polyether ether ketone implants, and these devices seem to have sufficient stiffness and pullout strength. However, further trials are necessary to determine if there is a clinically significant impact on local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Takayanagi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Riverside University Health Systems, Moreno Valley, California, USA
| | - Imran Siddiqi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Riverside University Health Systems, Moreno Valley, California, USA.
| | - Hammad Ghanchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Riverside University Health Systems, Moreno Valley, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Permutter Cancer Center, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Frank Vrionis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Marcus Neuroscience Institute, Boca Raton, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | - John Ratliff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Mark Bilsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Omid R Hariri
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Orange County, Anaheim, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Neal MT, Richards AE, Curley KL, Patel NP, Ashman JB, Vora SA, Kalani MA. Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK instrumentation in the spinal oncology population: a retrospective series demonstrating technique, feasibility, and clinical outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 50:E13. [PMID: 33932921 DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.focus20995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and advantages of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK (CFRP) composite implants in patients with both primary and secondary osseous spinal tumors. METHODS Twenty-eight spinal tumor patients who underwent fixation with CFRP hardware were retrospectively identified in a Spine Tumor Quality Database at a single institution. Demographic, procedural, and follow-up data were retrospectively collected. RESULTS The study population included 14 females and 14 males with a mean age of 60 years (range 30-86 years). Five patients had primary bone tumors, and the remaining patients had metastatic tumors. Breast cancer was the most common metastatic tumor. The most common presenting symptom was axial spine pain (25 patients, 89%), and the most common Spine Instability Neoplastic Score was 7 (range 6-14). Two patients in this series had anterior cervical procedures. The remaining patients underwent posterior thoracolumbar fixation. The average fusion length included 4.6 vertebral segments (range 3-8). The mean clinical follow-up time with surgical or oncology teams was 6.5 months (range 1-23 months), and the mean interval for last follow-up imaging (CT or MRI) was 6.5 months (range 1-22 months). Eighteen patients received postoperative radiation at the authors' institution (16 with photon therapy, 2 with proton therapy). Eleven of the patients (39%) in this series died. At the last clinical follow-up, 26 patients (93%) had stable or improved neurological function compared with their preoperative status. At the last imaging follow-up, local disease control was observed in 25 patients (89%). Two patients required reoperation in the immediate postoperative period, one for surgical site infection and the other for compressive epidural hematoma. One patient was noted to have lucencies around the most cephalad screws 3 months after surgery. No hardware fracture or malfunction occurred intraoperatively. No patients required delayed surgery for hardware loosening, fracture, or other failure. Early tumor recurrence was detected in 3 patients. Early detection was attributed to the imaging characteristics of the CFRP hardware. CONCLUSIONS CFRP spinal implants appear to be safe and comparable to conventional titanium implants in terms of functionality. The imaging characteristics of CFRP hardware facilitate radiation planning and assessment of surveillance imaging. CFRP hardware may enhance safety and efficacy, particularly with particle therapy dosimetry. Larger patient populations with longer-term follow-up are needed to confirm the various valuable aspects of CFRP spinal implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Sujay A Vora
- 2Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pennington Z, Ehresman J, Elsamadicy AA, Shin JH, Goodwin CR, Schwab JH, Sciubba DM. Systematic review of charged-particle therapy for chordomas and sarcomas of the mobile spine and sacrum. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 50:E17. [PMID: 33932924 DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.focus201059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Long-term local control in patients with primary chordoma and sarcoma of the spine and sacrum is increasingly reliant upon en bloc resection with negative margins. At many institutions, adjuvant radiation is recommended; definitive radiation is also recommended for the treatment of unresectable tumors. Because of the high off-target radiation toxicities associated with conventional radiotherapy, there has been growing interest in the use of proton and heavy-ion therapies. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding these therapies. METHODS The PubMed, OVID, Embase, and Web of Science databases were queried for articles describing the use of proton, combined proton/photon, or heavy-ion therapies for adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy in patients with primary sarcoma or chordoma of the mobile spine and sacrum. A qualitative synthesis of the results was performed, focusing on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS); local control; and postradiation toxicities. RESULTS Of 595 unique articles, 64 underwent full-text screening and 38 were included in the final synthesis. All studies were level III or IV evidence with a high risk of bias; there was also significant overlap in the reported populations, with six centers accounting for roughly three-fourths of all reports. Five-year therapy outcomes were as follows: proton-only therapies, OS 67%-82%, PFS 31%-57%, and DFS 52%-62%; metastases occurred in 17%-18% and acute toxicities in 3%-100% of cases; combined proton/photon therapy, local control 62%-85%, OS 78%-87%, PFS 90%, and DFS 61%-72%; metastases occurred in 12%-14% and acute toxicities in 84%-100% of cases; and carbon ion therapy, local control 53%-100%, OS 52%-86%, PFS (only reported for 3 years) 48%-76%, and DFS 50%-53%; metastases occurred in 2%-39% and acute toxicities in 26%-48%. There were no studies directly comparing outcomes between photon and charged-particle therapies or comparing outcomes between radiation and surgical groups. CONCLUSIONS The current evidence for charged-particle therapies in the management of sarcomas of the spine and sacrum is limited. Preliminary evidence suggests that with these therapies local control and OS at 5 years are comparable among various charged-particle options and may be similar between those treated with definitive charged-particle therapy and historical surgical cohorts. Further research directly comparing charged-particle and photon-based therapies is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Pennington
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jeff Ehresman
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Aladine A Elsamadicy
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - John H Shin
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and
| | - Joseph H Schwab
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wagner A, Haag E, Joerger AK, Jost P, Combs SE, Wostrack M, Gempt J, Meyer B. Comprehensive surgical treatment strategy for spinal metastases. Sci Rep 2021; 11:7988. [PMID: 33846484 PMCID: PMC8042046 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87121-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with spinal metastases (SM) requires a multidisciplinary team of specialists involved in oncological care. Surgical management has evolved significantly over the recent years, which warrants reevaluation of its role in the oncological treatment concept. Any patient with a SM was screened for study inclusion. We report baseline characteristics, surgical procedures, complication rates, functional status and outcome of a large consecutive cohort undergoing surgical treatment according to an algorithm. 667 patients underwent 989 surgeries with a mean age of 65 years (min/max 20–94) between 2007 and 2018. The primary cancers mostly originated from the prostate (21.7%), breast (15.9%) and lung (10.0%). Surgical treatment consisted of dorsoventral stabilization in 69.5%, decompression without instrumentation in 12.5% and kyphoplasty in 18.0%. Overall survival reached 18.4 months (95% CI 9.8–26.9) and the median KPS increased by 10 within hospital stay. Surgical management of SMs should generally represent the first step of a conclusive treatment algorithm. The need to preserve long-term symptom control and biomechanical stability requires a surgical strategy currently not supported by level I evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Elena Haag
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Joerger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Jost
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Wostrack
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kumar N, Ramakrishnan SA, Lopez KG, Madhu S, Ramos MRD, Fuh JYH, Hallinan J, Nolan CP, Benneker LM, Vellayappan BA. Can Polyether Ether Ketone Dethrone Titanium as the Choice Implant Material for Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery? World Neurosurg 2021; 148:94-109. [PMID: 33508491 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Instrumentation during metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS) provides stability to the spinal column in patients with pathologic fracture or iatrogenic instability produced while undergoing extensive decompression. Titanium is the current implant material of choice in MSTS. However, it hinders radiotherapy planning and generates artifacts, with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans used for postoperative evaluation of tumor recurrence and/or complications. The high modulus of elasticity of titanium (110 GPa) results in stress shielding, which may lead to construct failure at the bone-implant interface. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK), a thermoplastic polymer, is an emerging alternative to titanium for use in MSTS. The modulus of elasticity of PEEK (3.6 GPa) is close to that of cortical bone (17-21 GPa), resulting in minimal stress shielding. Its radiolucent and nonmetallic properties cause minimal interference with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans. PEEK also causes low-dose perturbation for radiotherapy planning. However, PEEK has reduced bioactivity with bone and lacks sufficient rigidity to be used as rods in MSTS. The reduced bioactivity of PEEK may be addressed by 1) surface modification (introducing porosity or bioactive coating with hydroxyapatite [HA] or titanium) and 2) forming composites with HA/titanium. The mechanical properties of PEEK may be improved by forming composites with HA or carbon fiber. Despite these modifications, all PEEK and PEEK-based implants are difficult to handle and contour intraoperatively. Our review provides a comprehensive overview of PEEK and modified PEEK implants, with a description of their properties and limitations, potentially serving as a basis for their future development and use in MSTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naresh Kumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
| | | | - Keith Gerard Lopez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Sirisha Madhu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| | | | - Jerry Ying Hsi Fuh
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - James Hallinan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Colum P Nolan
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore
| | - Lorin M Benneker
- Department of Orthopaedics, Spine Surgery, Sonnenhofspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rousselle A, Amelot A, Thariat J, Jacob J, Mercy G, De Marzi L, Feuvret L. Metallic implants and CT artefacts in the CTV area: Where are we in 2020? Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:658-666. [PMID: 32859465 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is one of the main modalities of cancer treatment worldwide with computed tomography (CT), as the most commonly used imaging method for treatment planning system (TPS). Image reconstruction errors may greatly affect all the radiation therapy planning process, such as target delineation, dose calculation and delivery, particularly with particle therapy. Metallic implants, such as hip and spinal implants, and dental filling significantly deteriorate image quality. These hardware structures are often very complex in geometry leading to geometric complex artefacts in the clinical target volume (CTV) area, rendering the delineation of CTV challenging. In our review, we focus on the methods to overcome artefact consequences on CTV delineation: 1- medical approaches anticipating issues associated with imaging artefacts during preoperative multidisciplinary discussions while following standard recommendations; 2- common metal artefact reduction (MAR) methods such as manually override artefact regions, ballistics avoiding beam paths through implanted materials, megavoltage-CT (MVCT); 3- prospects with radiolucent implants, MAR algorithms and various methods of dual energy computed tomography (DECT). Despite substantial and broad evidence for their benefits, there is still no universal solution for cases involving implanted metallic devices. There is still a high need for research efforts to adapt technologies to our issue: "how do I accurately delineate the ideal CTV in a metal artefact area?"
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rousselle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 75013 Paris, France
| | - A Amelot
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHRU de Tours, 37000 Tours, France
| | - J Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre François-Baclesse/ARCHADE, Laboratoire de physique corpusculaire IN2P3-UMR6534 - Normandie Université, 1400 Caen, France
| | - J Jacob
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 75013 Paris, France
| | - G Mercy
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 75013 Paris, France
| | - L De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - L Feuvret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 75013 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|