Navigating Cognitive Dissonance: A Qualitative Content Analysis Exploring Medical Students' Experiences of Moral Distress in the Emergency Department

A narrative analysis of clerkship reflections: Medical student identity development in a changing world

BACKGROUND

Medical students' written reflections on their clinical experiences can be a useful tool for processing complex aspects of development as physicians. To create educational programs that scaffold adaptive professional identity development, it is essential to understand how medical students develop as professionals and process the dynamic sociocultural experiences of the current moment.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the developing professional consciousness of medical students through clerkship reflections.

DESIGN

Narrative analysis of written reflections are produced by clerkship students, who were asked to tell a story that resonated with the physician's relationship with patient, self and colleagues. Two independent readers applied inductive labels to generate a homogenous codebook, which was used to generate themes that were then used to construct a conceptual model.

KEY RESULTS

Four themes were identified in the data that describe relationships between medical students' developing professional identities and the norms of their future professional and personal communities. These included: medical students as outsiders, conflict between the student identifying with the patient versus the healthcare team, medical students' own value judgements and, finally, the changing societal mores as they relate to social and racial injustice. The conceptual model for this experience depicts the medical student as pulled between patients and the social context on one side and the professional context of the medical centre on the other. Students long to move towards identification with the healthcare team, but reject the extremes of medical culture that they view on conflict with social and racial justice.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical students in clinical training identify strongly with both patients and the medical team. Rather than viewing professional identity development as a longitudinal journey from one extreme to another, students have the power to call attention to entrenched problems within medical culture and increase empathy for patients by retaining their strong identification with the important issues of this time.

The utility of an online discussion board for reflective writing in an emergency medicine rotation

Background

Narrative analysis and reflection have been found to support professional identity formation (PIF) and resilience among medical students. In the emergency department, students have used reflective practice to process challenging clinical experiences, such as ethical dilemmas or moral distress. An online discussion board, however, has not been described as a curricular component of emergency medicine (EM) rotations. The objective of this educational innovation was to support medical students in an EM clinical rotation via an online discussion board for reflecting on and debriefing clinical experiences with faculty and peers.

Methods

Fifty-two medical students enrolled in the pass/fail EM elective between May 13, 2019, and October 30, 2020. Each cohort of six students took part in a cohort-specific discussion using the Canvas learning management system. Students were encouraged to post about any observations, reflections, or emotions after their shifts. Faculty course directors responded to each post using concepts of debriefing, coaching, and trauma-informed teaching.

Results

Over 18 months, 49 of 52 (94%) students participated in the discussion board. Of 346 total posts, half were by students, and the other half were faculty responses. Students posted 3.27 times each, on average. Students rarely raised questions about scientific knowledge content, fact-based aspects of patient care, or specific skills. Rather, they often posted about intensely affective reactions to experiences that left them with complex emotions. Upon review of posts by the course directors, the majority (54%) of students' posts contained a range of affective responses. Students appreciated faculty responses and supported each other in their written responses to peers.

Conclusions

An online discussion board can be used successfully for asynchronous reflective practice to debrief clinical experiences during an EM rotation, if designed incorporating faculty and peer support using trauma-informed teaching principles to bolster well-being and PIF.

A systematic scoping review moral distress amongst medical students

BACKGROUND

Characterised by feelings of helplessness in the face of clinical, organization and societal demands, medical students are especially prone to moral distress (MD). Despite risks of disillusionment and burnout, efforts to support them have been limited by a dearth of data and understanding of MD in medical students. Yet, new data on how healthcare professionals confront difficult care situations suggest that MD could be better understood through the lens of the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP). A systematic scoping review (SSR) guided by the RToP is proposed to evaluate the present understanding of MD amongst medical students.

METHODS

The Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) is adopted to map prevailing accounts of MD in medical students. To enhance the transparency and reproducibility, the SEBA methodology employs a structured search approach, concurrent and independent thematic analysis and directed content analysis (Split Approach), the Jigsaw Perspective that combines complementary themes and categories, and the Funnelling Process that compares the results of the Jigsaw Perspective with tabulated summaries to ensure the accountability of these findings. The domains created guide the discussion.

RESULTS

Two thousand six hundred seventy-one abstracts were identified from eight databases, 316 articles were reviewed, and 20 articles were included. The four domains identified include definitions, sources, recognition and, interventions for MD.

CONCLUSIONS

MD in medical students may be explained as conflicts between the values, duties, and principles contained within the different aspects of their identity. These conflicts which are characterised as disharmony (within) and dyssynchrony (between) the rings of RToP underline the need for personalised and longitudinal evaluations and support of medical students throughout their training. This longitudinal oversight and support should be supported by the host organization that must also ensure access to trained faculty, a nurturing and safe environment for medical students to facilitate speak-up culture, anonymous reporting, feedback opportunities and supplementing positive role modelling and mentoring within the training program.

Insight from a novel humanities-based education intervention to teach empathy to internal medicine residents locally

The medical humanities have the potential to develop empathy in junior doctors through perspective taking and critique of deep-seated beliefs. An education intervention to develop empathy was integrated into an internal medicine residency curriculum in Singapore. All junior residents currently in the programme were invited to participate in individual interviews after the humanities sessions. Data collected was analysed qualitatively using thematic analysis. A total of three sessions were conducted over one year from April 2020. Two participants were recruited successfully for the study. A total of 4 interviews were completed and themes relating to the role of the humanities in empathy education, barriers to its implementation, and cynicism to the sessions were elicited. The results provided insight about how residents experienced a novel humanities-based postgraduate medical education program. However, the low recruitment is a major limitation in this study and data collected may not be confidently interpreted. There is still significant work needed to create greater awareness about the role of the humanities in medical education and research. Improvement in the pandemic situation may also improve participation in future studies.

Experience of General Practice Residents Caring for Dependent Elderly during the First COVID-19 Lockdown-A Qualitative Study

Background: Understanding the experiences of general practice (GP) residents caring for dependent elderly people during the first lockdown as part of the countries COVID-19 pandemic strategy. The aim was to explore themes that could explain the gap between the missions and values at the heart of GP practice during this period of strict isolation. Method: Qualitative study using an iterative approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 GP residents using a pre-established interview guide. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed according to a coding grid, developed using Nvivo software (NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version Release 1.5.1 (940) 2021), to identify emerging themes. Results: Three themes emerged from this qualitative research: cognitive dissonance, psychosocial risks, and fear. General practice residents have lived in the paradox between care and deprivation of liberty of dependent elderly people. Conclusion: The results suggest that the GP residents experienced a form of work-related suffering in this situation of deprivation of liberty of dependent elderly people. The present research serves as a pilot study to explore how GP residents experienced their care of locked-up dependent elderly people.

Misdiagnosis: Burnout, moral injury, and implications for the electronic health record

Burnout is a long-term stress reaction marked by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a lack of sense of personal accomplishment. Burnout in clinicians is receiving significant attention. Some have proposed that clinicians are experiencing symptoms of moral injury, defined as "perpetrating, failing to prevent, bearing witness to, or learning about acts that transgress deeply held moral beliefs and expectations." Current efforts to improve the electronic health record (EHR) have focused on improving the user experience to reduce burden that has been identified as a contributing factor to provider burnout. However, if EHRs are contributing to moral injury, improvements to user experience will not eliminate the effects on providers. Current research has not evaluated the risk for moral injury resulting from the use of EHRs. This Perspective reviews the differences between burnout and moral injury, discusses the implications for clinicians using EHRs, and highlights the need for research to better define the problem.

[Moral distress in medical students and young professionals: research desiderata in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic]

Hintergrund

Die COVID-19-Pandemie stellt Menschen, die in der medizinischen Versorgung arbeiten, vor besondere Herausforderungen. Ein Teil der Medizinstudierenden und ärztlichen Berufseinsteigenden, die in dieser Zeit in Einrichtungen der Gesundheitsversorgung ihre Mitarbeit beginnen, wird mit außergewöhnlichen moralischen Herausforderungen konfrontiert. Einige verfügen noch nicht über ausreichend Bewältigungsmöglichkeiten, um adäquat mit diesen Herausforderungen umzugehen. Dies kann zu sogenanntem moralischen Stress (MoS; Englisch: „moral distress“, MoD) führen. Dauerhafte oder intensive Belastung durch MoS kann gravierende Folgen haben. Geeignete Unterstützungsangebote haben das Potenzial, den Umgang mit MoS zu verbessern.

Ziel

Der Beitrag hat das Ziel, einen Überblick über den Stand der Forschung zu MoS von Medizinstudierenden und ärztlichen Berufseinsteigenden zu geben, um Lehrende mit Aus- und Weiterbildungsverantwortung und Ärzt*innen in Leitungspositionen für die Problematik zu sensibilisieren.

Hauptteil

In diesem Beitrag werden das wissenschaftliche Konzept MoS, bekannte Auslöser sowie Präventions- und Interventionsmöglichkeiten vorgestellt. Dazu wird das Thema Bezug nehmend auf die Veränderungen in der Patientenversorgung im Kontext der COVID-19-Pandemie analysiert und es werden Forschungsdesiderate aufgezeigt.

Fazit

Der Beitrag verdeutlicht die Notwendigkeit eines deutschsprachigen, interdisziplinären Diskurses über MoS bei Medizinstudierenden und Berufseinsteigenden.