1
|
Norman DJ, Enestvedt CK, Naugler WE, Erhan R, Shaut CA. The fate of anti-HLA antibodies following liver transplantation. FRONTIERS IN NEPHROLOGY 2024; 4:1403096. [PMID: 38933742 PMCID: PMC11199851 DOI: 10.3389/fneph.2024.1403096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Liver transplant recipients may have pre-formed anti-HLA antibodies directed to mismatched HLA of the liver donor (donor specific antibodies, DSA) or not directed to the liver donor (non-donor specific, non-DSA). We observed the fate of these antibodies (DSA and non-DSA) at 12 months after transplant. Methods Patients transplanted between 4/2015 and 12/2018 (N = 216) who had anti-HLA antibody measurements at both transplant and 12 months posttransplant (N = 124) and with DSAs at transplant (N = 31) were considered informative for a paired analysis of the natural history of DSA and non-DSA following liver transplantation. Results Class I DSAs and non-DSAs decreased between transplant and 12 months; however, Class I DSAs essentially disappeared by 12 months while Class I non-DSAs did not. Anti-HLA Class II DSAs performed differently. While there was a significant drop in values between transplant and 12 months, these antibodies mostly persisted at a low level. Discussion Our study demonstrated a significant difference in the kinetics of DSA compared to non-DSA following liver transplantation, most profoundly for anti-HLA Class I antibodies. Class I DSAs were mostly absent at 12 months while Class II DSAs persisted, although at lower levels. The mechanisms of reduction in anti-HLA antibodies following liver transplantation are not completely understood and were not pursued as a part of this study. This detailed analysis of Class I and Class II DSAs and non-DSAs represents and important study to explore the change in antibodies at one year from liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas J. Norman
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics and Transplantation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
- Section of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - C. Kristian Enestvedt
- Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Willscott E. Naugler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Rouella Erhan
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics and Transplantation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Carley A. Shaut
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics and Transplantation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kosuta I, Kelava T, Ostojic A, Sesa V, Mrzljak A, Lalic H. Immunology demystified: A guide for transplant hepatologists. World J Transplant 2024; 14:89772. [PMID: 38576757 PMCID: PMC10989464 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.89772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation has become standard practice for treating end-stage liver disease. The success of the procedure relies on effective immunosuppressive medications to control the host's immune response. Despite the liver's inherent capacity to foster tolerance, the early post-transplant period is marked by significant immune reactivity. To ensure favorable outcomes, it is imperative to identify and manage various rejection types, encompassing T-cell-mediated, antibody-mediated, and chronic rejection. However, the approach to prescribing immunosuppressants relies heavily on clinical judgment rather than evidence-based criteria. Given that the majority of patients will require lifelong immuno suppression as the mechanisms underlying operational tolerance are still being investigated, healthcare providers must possess an understanding of immune responses, rejection mechanisms, and the pathways targeted by immunosuppressive drugs. This knowledge enables customization of treatments and improved patient care, even though a consensus on an optimal immunosuppressive regimen remains elusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iva Kosuta
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Tomislav Kelava
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Univeristy of Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
- Laboratory for Molecular Immunology, Croatian Institute for Brain Research, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Ana Ostojic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liver Transplant Center, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Vibor Sesa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liver Transplant Center, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Anna Mrzljak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Hrvoje Lalic
- Department of Physiology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
- Laboratory for Cell Biology, Croatian Institute for Brain Research, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
- Department of Laboratory Immunology, Clinical Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chambord J, Chauveau B, Djabarouti S, Vignaud J, Taton B, Moreau K, Visentin J, Merville P, Xuereb F, Couzi L. Measurement of the Immunosuppressant Possession Ratio by Transplant Clinical Pharmacists Captures a Non-Adherence Associated With Antibody-Mediated Rejection. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11962. [PMID: 38089004 PMCID: PMC10713790 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Our objective was to calculate an immunosuppressant possession ratio (IPR) to diagnose non-adherence at the time of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). IPR was defined as the ratio of number of pills collected at the pharmacy to the number of pills prescribed over a defined period. In a first cohort of 91 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), those with an IPR < 90% had more frequently a tacrolimus through level coefficient of variation >30% than patients with an IPR = 100% (66.7% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.05). In a case-control study, 26 KTRs with ABMR had lower 6 months IPRs than 26 controls (76% vs. 99%, p < 0.001). In KTRs with ABMR, non-adherence was more often diagnosed by a 6 months IPR < 90% than by clinical suspicion (73.1% vs 30.8%, p = 0.02). In the multivariable analysis, only de novo DSA and 6 months IPR < 90% were independently associated with ABMR, whereas clinical suspicion was not (odds ratio, 4.73; 95% CI, 1.17-21.88; p = 0.03; and odds ratio, 6.34; 95% CI, 1.73-25.59; p = 0.007, respectively). In summary, IPR < 90% is a quantifiable tool to measure immunosuppressant non-adherence. It is better associated with ABMR than clinical suspicion of non-adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémy Chambord
- Service de Pharmacie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bertrand Chauveau
- Service d’Anatomopathologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS-UMR 5164 ImmunoConcEpT, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sarah Djabarouti
- Service de Pharmacie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- INSERM U1312 BRIEC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean Vignaud
- Service de Pharmacie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Benjamin Taton
- Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse, Aphérèse, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Karine Moreau
- Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse, Aphérèse, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jonathan Visentin
- CNRS-UMR 5164 ImmunoConcEpT, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- Service d’Immunologie et Immunogénétique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pierre Merville
- CNRS-UMR 5164 ImmunoConcEpT, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse, Aphérèse, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Fabien Xuereb
- Service de Pharmacie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- INSERM U1034, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Lionel Couzi
- CNRS-UMR 5164 ImmunoConcEpT, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse, Aphérèse, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tajima T, Hata K, Kusakabe J, Miyauchi H, Badshah JS, Kageyama S, Zhao X, Kim SK, Tsuruyama T, Kirchner VA, Watanabe T, Uemoto S, Hatano E. Anti-complement 5 antibody ameliorates antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation in rats. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1186653. [PMID: 37398677 PMCID: PMC10313232 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1186653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a refractory rejection after donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive or blood-type incompatible liver transplantation (LT), even in the era of pre-transplant rituximab desensitization. This is due to the lack of not only effective post-transplant treatments but also robust animal models to develop/validate new interventions. Orthotopic LT from male Dark Agouti (DA) to male Lewis (LEW) rats was used to develop a rat LT-AMR model. LEW were pre-sensitized by a preceding skin transplantation from DA 4-6 weeks before LT (Group-PS), while sham procedure was performed in non-sensitized controls (Group-NS). Tacrolimus was daily administered until post-transplant day (PTD)-7 or sacrifice to suppress cellular rejections. Using this model, we validated the efficacy of anti-C5 antibody (Anti-C5) for LT-AMR. Group-PS+Anti-C5 received Anti-C5 intravenously on PTD-0 and -3. Group-PS showed increased anti-donor (DA) antibody-titers (P <0.001) and more C4d deposition in transplanted livers than in Group-NS (P <0.001). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bile acid (TBA), and total bilirubin (T-Bil) were all significantly higher in Group-PS than in Group-NS (all P <0.01). Thrombocytopenia (P <0.01), coagulopathies (PT-INR, P =0.04), and histopathological deterioration (C4d+h-score, P <0.001) were also confirmed in Group-PS. Anti-C5 administration significantly lowered anti-DA IgG (P <0.05), resulting in decreased ALP, TBA, and T-Bil on PTD-7 than in Group-PS (all P <0.01). Histopathological improvement was also confirmed on PTD-1, -3, and -7 (all P <0.001). Of the 9,543 genes analyzed by RNA sequencing, 575 genes were upregulated in LT-AMR (Group-PS vs. Group-NS). Of these, 6 were directly associated with the complement cascades. In particular, Ptx3, Tfpi2, and C1qtnf6 were specific to the classical pathway. Volcano plot analysis identified 22 genes that were downregulated by Anti-C5 treatment (Group-PS+Anti-C5 vs. Group-PS). Of these, Anti-C5 significantly down-regulated Nfkb2, Ripk2, Birc3, and Map3k1, the key genes that were amplified in LT-AMR. Notably, just two doses of Anti-C5 only on PTD-0 and -3 significantly improved biliary injury and liver fibrosis up to PTD-100, leading to better long-term animal survival (P =0.02). We newly developed a rat model of LT-AMR that meets all the Banff diagnostic criteria and demonstrated the efficacy of Anti-C5 antibody for LT-AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Tajima
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koichiro Hata
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Jiro Kusakabe
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Miyauchi
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Joshua Sam Badshah
- Department of Surgery , Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Shoichi Kageyama
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Xiangdong Zhao
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Sung-Kwon Kim
- Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc., New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Tatsuaki Tsuruyama
- Department of Drug Discovery Medicine, Pathology Division, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Varvara A. Kirchner
- Department of Surgery , Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Takeshi Watanabe
- Division of Immunology, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinji Uemoto
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
- Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen X, Wang Y, Dong P, Wang J, Yu X, Yu B. Efficacy of Combined Desensitization Therapy Based on Protein A Immunoadsorption on Anti-human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies in Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Study. Cureus 2022; 14:e28661. [PMID: 36196288 PMCID: PMC9525051 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives Protein A immunoadsorption (PA-IA) therapy is an immunoglobulin selective apheresis for pre-transplantation desensitization therapy and treatment of post-transplantation antibody-mediated rejection. There is no unified protocol for the timing of PA-IA therapy or its combination with other drug therapy. This study aimed to investigate and analyze the clearance effects of desensitization therapy on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies to provide a reference for the formulation of clinical desensitization therapy regimens. Materials and methods Overall, 27 kidney transplant recipients who received preoperative/postoperative desensitization therapy based on PA-IA therapy in combination with drug therapy were enrolled. The pre-treatment mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 1324 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody specificities (MFI >2000) and the post-treatment MFI of the corresponding antibody specificities (after one, four, seven, and 10 sessions) were recorded to analyze the changes in antibody level reduction for the different antibody classes and MFI ranges. Results After 10 sessions of PA-IA therapy, the MFI of class I antibodies decreased from 8298.56 to 3196.15 (reduction of 66.80%), while the MFI of class II antibodies decreased from 13,521.09 to 2773.29 (reduction of 71.14%). The pre-treatment level of class II antibodies was significantly higher than that of class I antibodies (p<0.001), whereas the post-treatment levels of class I and II antibodies were comparable (p>0.05). The clearance effects of PA-IA therapy were greater for strongly positive (MFI>10,000) class II antibodies than for strongly positive class I antibodies, showing a reduction of 62.59% (25.17% to 91.04%) and 45.13% (32.70% to 73.94%), respectively (p=0.015). Conclusions We confirmed the removal efficacy of PA-IA for HLA antibodies. The removal efficacy of class II antibodies on PA-IA is not inferior to that of class I. Under an adequate number of treatment sessions, the clearance effect of PA-IA therapy for strongly positive class II antibodies may be greater than that for strongly positive class I antibodies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Vij M, Rammohan A, Rela M. Long-term liver allograft fibrosis: A review with emphasis on idiopathic post-transplant hepatitis and chronic antibody mediated rejection. World J Hepatol 2022; 14:1541-1549. [PMID: 36157865 PMCID: PMC9453462 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i8.1541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving surgical procedure and the current standard of care for most patients with end stage liver disease. With improvements in organ preservation techniques, perioperative care, and immunosuppression, there is better patient and graft survival following LT, and assessment of the liver allograft in long-term survivors is becoming increasingly important. Recurrent or de novo viral or autoimmune injury remains the most common causes of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis following liver transplantation in adults. However, no obvious cause can be identified in many adults with controlled recurrent disease and the majority of pediatric LT recipients, as they have been transplanted for non-recurrent liver diseases. Serial surveillance liver biopsies post LT have been evaluated in several adult and pediatric centers to identify long-term pathological changes. Pathological findings are frequently present in liver biopsies obtained after a year post LT. The significance of these findings is uncertain as many of these are seen in protocol liver biopsies from patients with clinically good allograft function and normal liver chemistry parameters. This narrative review summaries the factors predisposing to long-term liver allograft fibrosis, highlighting the putative role of idiopathic post-LT hepatitis and chronic antibody mediated rejection in its pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mukul Vij
- Department of Pathology, Dr. Rela Institute and Medical Center, Chennai 600044, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Ashwin Rammohan
- Institute of Liver disease and Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute and Medical Center, Chennai 600044, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Mohamed Rela
- Institute of Liver disease and Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute and Medical Center, Chennai 600044, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meszaros M, Dubois V, Congy-Jolivet N, Hamada S, Thevenin C, Faure S, Boillot O, Kamar N, Pageaux GP, Del Bello A, Dumortier J. Impact of calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression on de novo donor-specific antibody formation in liver transplant recipients. Liver Int 2022; 42:1132-1143. [PMID: 35184373 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Low calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) levels expose liver transplant recipients to rejection episodes and potentially to antibody-mediated rejection. There are little data on the impact of CNI-free immunosuppression on de novo donor-specific HLA antibody (dnDSA) development. Here we evaluated the prevalence of dnDSA in liver transplant recipients on CNI-free maintenance regimens and their associations with histopathological abnormalities of allografts. METHODS Seven hundred and twenty-seven liver transplant recipients underwent a first liver transplant between 2000 and 2018 in three French transplant centres and had protocolized follow-up with dnDSA screening and allograft biopsy 1, 5 and 10 years after transplantation. RESULTS CNIs were withdrawn in 166 (22.8%) patients with or without conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and/or maintenance with mycophenolic acid. DSA were present after withdrawal in 30.1% (50/166) patients on CNI-free immunosuppression compared with 16% (90/561) on CNI maintenance therapy (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of dnDSA 10 years after transplant was 20% in the CNI group versus 28% in the CNI-free group (p < 0.01). dnDSAs were associated with histological graft abnormalities (significant allograft fibrosis or rejection) (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.2-4.1; p = 0.01). In univariate Cox regression analysis, being on a CNI-free regimen did not impact graft histology. CONCLUSIONS Patients on a CNI-free IS regimen have a higher prevalence of dnDSA than patients on a standard IS regimen. dnDSAs but not CNI-free immunosuppression were associated with abnormal allograft histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Meszaros
- Département d'hépatologie et transplantation hépatique, CHU Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Valérie Dubois
- Etablissement Français du Sang, Laboratoire d'Histocompatibilité, Lyon, France
| | | | - Sarah Hamada
- Etablissement Français du Sang, Laboratoire d'Histocompatibilité, Lyon, France
| | - Céline Thevenin
- Département d'Immunologie, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Stephanie Faure
- Département d'hépatologie et transplantation hépatique, CHU Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Boillot
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Unité de Transplantation hépatique, Lyon, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Département de Néphrologie et Transplantation d'Organes, CHU, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Arnaud Del Bello
- Département de Néphrologie et Transplantation d'Organes, CHU, Toulouse, France
| | - Jérôme Dumortier
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Unité de Transplantation hépatique, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Angelico R, Sensi B, Manzia TM, Tisone G, Grassi G, Signorello A, Milana M, Lenci I, Baiocchi L. Chronic rejection after liver transplantation: Opening the Pandora’s box. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:7771-7783. [PMID: 34963740 PMCID: PMC8661381 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i45.7771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic rejection (CR) of liver allografts causes damage to intrahepatic vessels and bile ducts and may lead to graft failure after liver transplantation. Although its prevalence has declined steadily with the introduction of potent immunosuppressive therapy, CR still represents an important cause of graft injury, which might be irreversible, leading to graft loss requiring re-transplantation. To date, we still do not fully appreciate the mechanisms underlying this process. In addition to T cell-mediated CR, which was initially the only recognized type of CR, recently a new form of liver allograft CR, antibody-mediated CR, has been identified. This has indeed opened an era of thriving research and renewed interest in the field. Liver biopsy is needed for a definitive diagnosis of CR, but current research is aiming to identify new non-invasive tools for predicting patients at risk for CR after liver transplantation. Moreover, the minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy might influence the establishment of subclinical CR-related injury, which should not be disregarded. Therapies for CR may only be effective in the “early” phases, and a tailored management of the immunosuppression regimen is essential for preventing irreversible liver damage. Herein, we provide an overview of the current knowledge and research on CR, focusing on early detection, identification of non-invasive biomarkers, immunosuppressive management, re-transplantation and future perspectives of CR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Angelico
- Department of Surgery Sciences, HPB and Transplant Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Department of Surgery Sciences, HPB and Transplant Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | - Tommaso M Manzia
- Department of Surgery Sciences, HPB and Transplant Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tisone
- Department of Surgery Sciences, HPB and Transplant Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Grassi
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | | | - Martina Milana
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | - Ilaria Lenci
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nakamura T, Shirouzu T. Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Recurrent Primary Disease: Two Main Obstacles in Abdominal Kidney, Liver, and Pancreas Transplants. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5417. [PMID: 34830699 PMCID: PMC8619797 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The advances in acute phase care have firmly established the practice of organ transplantation in the last several decades. Then, the next issues that loom large in the field of transplantation include antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and recurrent primary disease. Acute ABMR is a daunting hurdle in the performance of organ transplantation. The recent progress in desensitization and preoperative monitoring of donor-specific antibodies enables us to increase positive outcomes. However, chronic active ABMR is one of the most significant problems we currently face. On the other hand, recurrent primary disease is problematic for many recipients. Notably, some recipients, unfortunately, lost their vital organs due to this recurrence. Although some progress has been achieved in these two areas, many other factors remain largely obscure. In this review, these two topics will be discussed in light of recent discoveries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsukasa Nakamura
- Department of Organ Transplantation and General Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kajii-cho 465, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
| | - Takayuki Shirouzu
- Molecular Diagnositcs Division, Wakunaga Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 13-4 Arakicho, shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0007, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Long-term, Prolonged-release Tacrolimus-based Immunosuppression in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: 5-year Prospective Follow-up of Patients in the DIAMOND Study. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e722. [PMID: 34263020 PMCID: PMC8274734 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is reportedly associated with risk of renal impairment in liver transplant recipients. It is believed that this can be mitigated by decreasing initial exposure to CNIs or delaying CNI introduction until 3-4 d posttransplantation. The ADVAGRAF studied in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and basiliximab in liver transplantation (DIAMOND) trial evaluated different administration strategies for prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T). Methods DIAMOND was a 24-wk, open-label, phase 3b trial in de novo liver transplant recipients randomized to: PR-T 0.2 mg/kg/d (Arm 1); PR-T 0.15-0.175 mg/kg/d plus basiliximab (Arm 2); or PR-T 0.2 mg/kg/d delayed until day 5 posttransplant plus basiliximab (Arm 3). In a 5-y follow-up, patients were maintained on an immunosuppressive regimen according to standard clinical practice (NCT02057484). Primary endpoint: graft survival (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Results Follow-up study included 856 patients. Overall graft survival was 84.6% and 73.5% at 1 and 5 y post transplant, respectively. Five-year rates for Arms 1, 2, and 3 were 74.7%, 71.5%, and 74.5%, respectively. At 5 y, death-censored graft survival in the entire cohort was 74.7%. Overall graft survival in patients remaining on PR-T for ≥30 d was 79.1%. Graft survival in patients who remained on PR-T at 5 y was 87.3%. Patient survival was 86.6% at 1 y and 76.3% at 5 y, with survival rates similar in the 3 treatment arms at 5 y. Estimated glomerular filtration rate at the end of the 24-wk initial study and 5 y posttransplant was 62.1 and 61.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, and was similar between the 3 treatment arms at 5 y. Overall, 18 (2.9%) patients had ≥1 adverse drug reaction, considered possibly related to PR-T in 6 patients. Conclusions In the DIAMOND study patient cohort, renal function, graft survival, and patient survival were similar between treatment arms at 5 y posttransplant.
Collapse
|
11
|
Schotters FL, Beime J, Briem-Richter A, Binder T, Herden U, Grabhorn EF. Impact of donor-specific antibodies on long-term graft survival with pediatric liver transplantation. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:673-685. [PMID: 34239702 PMCID: PMC8239487 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i6.673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a previous paper, we reported a high prevalence of donor-specific antibody (DSA) in pediatric patients with chronic rejection and expressed the need for confirmation of these findings in a larger cohort.
AIM To clarify the importance of DSAs on long-term graft survival in a larger cohort of pediatric patients.
METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 123 pediatric liver transplantation (LT) recipients who participated in yearly follow-ups including Luminex testing for DSA at our center. The cohort was split into two groups according to the DSA status (DSA-positive n = 54, DSA-negative n = 69). Groups were compared with regard to liver function, biopsy findings, graft survival, need for re-LT and immunosuppressive medication.
RESULTS DSA-positive pediatric patients showed a higher prevalence of chronic rejection (P = 0.01), fibrosis (P < 0.001) and re-transplantation (P = 0.018) than DSA-negative patients. Class II DSAs particularly influenced graft survival. Alleles DQ2, DQ7, DQ8 and DQ9 might serve as indicators for the risk of chronic rejection and/or allograft fibrosis. Mean fluorescence intensity levels and DSA number did not impact graft survival. Previous episodes of chronic rejection might lead to DSA development.
CONCLUSION DSA prevalence significantly affected long-term liver allograft performance and liver allograft survival in our cohort of pediatric LT. Screening for class II DSAs in combination with assessment of protocol liver biopsies for chronic antibody-mediated rejection improved early identification of patients at risk of graft loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicitas Leonie Schotters
- Department of Pediatric Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Jan Beime
- Department of Pediatric Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Andrea Briem-Richter
- Department of Pediatric Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Thomas Binder
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Human Leucocyte Antigen Laboratory, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock 18057, Germany
| | - Uta Herden
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Transplant Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - Enke Freya Grabhorn
- Department of Pediatric Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gül-Klein S, Hegermann H, Röhle R, Schmelzle M, Tacke F, Schöning W, Öllinger R, Dziodzio T, Maier P, Plewe JM, Horst D, Sauer IM, Pratschke J, Lachmann N, Eurich D. Donor-Specific Antibodies Against Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen are Associated with Graft Inflammation but Not with Fibrosis Long-Term After Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of Protocol Biopsies. J Inflamm Res 2021; 14:2697-2712. [PMID: 34188517 PMCID: PMC8236257 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s307778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against donor human leukocyte antigen after liver transplantation, which are associated with histological changes, have been widely studied with respect to their sustained impact on transplant function. However, their long-term impact after liver transplantation remains unclear. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis from June 2016 to July 2017 that included all patients who presented themselves for scheduled follow-up after receiving a liver transplantation between September 1989 and December 2016. In addition to a liver protocol biopsy, patients were screened for human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLAab) and donor-specific antibodies. Subsequently, the association between human leukocyte antigen antibodies, donor-specific antibodies, histologic and clinical features, and immunosuppression was analyzed. Results Analysis for human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was performed for 291 and 271 patients. A significant association between higher inflammation grades and the presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies was detected, while fibrosis stages remained unaffected. These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic regression for inflammation showing a significant increase for presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies (OR: 4.43; 95% CI: 1.67–12.6; p=0.0035). Furthermore, the use of everolimus in combination with tacrolimus was significantly associated with the status of negative human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies. Viral etiology for liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and higher steatosis grades of the graft were significantly associated with a lower rate of human leukocyte antigen antibodies. The impact of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was associated with higher levels of laboratory parameters, such as transaminases and bilirubin. Conclusion Donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen are associated with histological and biochemical graft inflammation after liver transplantation, while fibrosis seems to be unaffected. Future studies should validate these findings for longer observation periods and specific subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safak Gül-Klein
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henriette Hegermann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Röhle
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Coordinating Center for Clinical Studies, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Tacke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tomasz Dziodzio
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Patrick Maier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julius M Plewe
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Igor Maximilian Sauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Lachmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, HLA Laboratory, Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dennis Eurich
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu W, Wang K, Xiao YL, Liu C, Gao W, Li DH. Clinical relevance of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies after pediatric liver transplantation. Exp Ther Med 2021; 22:867. [PMID: 34194545 PMCID: PMC8237393 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) have a significant role in graft survival after pediatric liver transplantation. To understand the significance of DSAs, a retrospective cohort study of 48 pediatric liver transplant recipients with posttransplant serum samples that were analyzed for DSAs was performed. According to their test results, the recipients were divided into a DSA-positive group and a DSA-negative group. Postoperative liver transplantation biopsies were performed in patients with abnormal liver function. The liver condition and prognosis of the recipients were recorded, and their association was analyzed. A total of 48 recipients were followed up for 2.7±0.8 years. DSA positivity was detected in 10 cases (20.8%). One case was positive for HLA class I and HLA class II antibodies, whereas 9 cases were positive for HLA class II antibodies, and the gene loci were HLA-DR and/or DQ. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurred in four of 10 patients in the DSA-positive group. Liver function was abnormal in 3 of 38 cases in the DSA-negative group. Multivariate analysis revealed that DSA positivity was an independent risk factor for liver insufficiency and long-term survival of recipients. In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that there were significant differences in the survival of graft recipients between the DSA-positive group and the DSA-negative group (P<0.05). The positivity of DSAs after pediatric liver transplantation was closely related to the occurrence of AMR. These results suggested that DSAs should be routinely monitored post-operatively, and that DSA-positive recipients should be screened as soon as possible and given appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Department of Blood Transfusion, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Yan-Li Xiao
- Department of Blood Transfusion, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Chun Liu
- Department of Blood Transfusion, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Wei Gao
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| | - Dai-Hong Li
- Department of Blood Transfusion, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schmitz R, Fitch ZW, Schroder PM, Choi AY, Jackson AM, Knechtle SJ, Kwun J. B cells in transplant tolerance and rejection: friends or foes? Transpl Int 2021; 33:30-40. [PMID: 31705678 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Our understanding of the role of B cells in organ transplantation remains incomplete and continues to grow. The majority of research has focused on the detrimental role of antibodies that drive the development of pathogenesis of the transplanted organ. However, it has been shown that not all donor-specific antibodies are harmful and in some circumstances can even promote tolerance through the mechanism of accommodation. Furthermore, B cells can have effects on transplanted organs through their interaction with T cells, namely antigen presentation, cytokine production, and costimulation. More recently, the role and importance of Bregs was introduced to the field of transplantation. Due to this functional and ontogenetic heterogeneity, targeting B cells in transplantation may bring undesired immunologic side effects including increased rejection. Therefore, the selective control of B cells that contribute to the humoral response against donor antigens will continue to be an important and challenging area of research and potentially lead to improved long-term transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zachary W Fitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul M Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ashley Y Choi
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Annette M Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prospective Measures of Adherence by Questionnaire, Low Immunosuppression and Graft Outcome in Kidney Transplantation. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10092032. [PMID: 34068497 PMCID: PMC8125965 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10092032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Non-adherence with immunosuppressant medication (MNA) fosters development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), rejection, and graft failure (GF) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, there is no simple tool to assess MNA, prospectively. The goal was to monitor MNA and analyze its predictive value for dnDSA generation, acute rejection and GF. Methods: We enrolled 301 KTRs in a multicentric French study. MNA was assessed prospectively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (M) post-KT, using the Morisky scale. We investigated the association between MNA and occurrence of dnDSA at year 2 post transplantation, using logistic regression models and the association between MNA and rejection or graft failure, using Cox multivariable models. Results: The initial percentage of MNA patients was 17.7%, increasing to 34.6% at 24 months. Nineteen patients (8.4%) developed dnDSA 2 to 3 years after KT. After adjustment for recipient age, HLA sensitization, HLA mismatches, and maintenance treatment, MNA was associated neither with dnDSA occurrence, nor acute rejection. Only cyclosporine use and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal were strongly associated with dnDSA and rejection. With a median follow-up of 8.9 years, GF occurred in 87 patients (29.0%). After adjustment for recipient and donor age, CNI trough level, dnDSA, and rejection, MNA was not associated with GF. The only parameters associated with GF were dnDSA occurrence, and acute rejection. Conclusions: Prospective serial monitoring of MNA using the Morisky scale does not predict dnDSA occurrence, rejection or GF in KTRs. In contrast, cyclosporine and CNI withdrawal induce dnDSA and rejection, which lead to GF.
Collapse
|
16
|
Beyzaei Z, Geramizadeh B, Bagheri Z, Karimzadeh S, Shojazadeh A. De Novo Donor Specific Antibody and Long-Term Outcome After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Immunol 2020; 11:613128. [PMID: 33424868 PMCID: PMC7786049 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.613128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of de novo anti-HLA donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) which develop after long-term liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial and unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of de novo DSAs on the outcome in LT. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published until Dec 31, 2019, that reported de novo DSA outcome data (≥1 year of follow-up) after liver transplant. A literature search in the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection databases was performed. Results Of 5,325 studies identified, 15 fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The studies which reported 2016 liver transplant recipients with de novo DSAs showed an increased complication risk, i.e. graft loss and chronic rejection (OR 3.61; 95% CI 1.94-6.71, P < 0.001; I2 58.19%), and allograft rejection alone (OR 6.43; 95% CI: 3.17-13.04; P < 0.001; I2 49.77%); they were compared to patients without de novo DSAs. The association between de novo DSAs and overall outcome failure was consistent across all subgroups and sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Our study suggested that de novo DSAs had a significant deleterious impact on the liver transplant risk of rejection. The routine detection of de novo DSAs may be beneficial as noninvasive biomarker-guided risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Beyzaei
- Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Bita Geramizadeh
- Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- Department of Pathology, Medical School of Shiraz University, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Zahra Bagheri
- Department of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Sara Karimzadeh
- Shiraz Medical School Library, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Alireza Shojazadeh
- Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ünlü S, Lachmann N, Jara M, Ritschl PV, Wiering L, Eurich D, Denecke C, Biebl M, Chopra S, Gül-Klein S, Schöning W, Schmelzle M, Reinke P, Tacke F, Pratschke J, Öllinger R, Dziodzio T. Treatment of Anti-HLA Donor-Specific Antibodies Results in Increased Infectious Complications and Impairs Survival after Liver Transplantation. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9123986. [PMID: 33317012 PMCID: PMC7763868 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) are controversially discussed in the context of liver transplantation (LT). We investigated the relationship between the presence of DSA and the outcome after LT. All the LTs performed at our center between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2015 were examined. Recipients < 18 years, living donor-, combined, high-urgency-, and re-transplantations were excluded. Out of 510 LTs, 113 DSA-positive cases were propensity score-matched with DSA-negative cases based on the components of the Balance of Risk score. One-, three-, and five-year survival after LT were 74.3% in DSA-positive vs. 84.8% (p = 0.053) in DSA-negative recipients, 71.8% vs. 71.5% (p = 0.821), and 69.3% vs. 64.9% (p = 0.818), respectively. Rejection therapy was more often applied to DSA-positive recipients (n = 77 (68.1%) vs. 37 (32.7%) in the control group, p < 0.001). At one year after LT, 9.7% of DSA-positive patients died due to sepsis compared to 1.8% in the DSA-negative group (p = 0.046). The remaining causes of death were comparable in both groups (cardiovascular 6.2% vs. 8.0%; p = 0.692; hepatic 3.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.788; malignancy 3.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.788). DSA seem to have an indirect effect on the outcome of adult LTs, impacting decision-making in post-transplant immunosuppression and rejection therapies and ultimately increasing mortality due to infectious complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinem Ünlü
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, H&I Laboratory, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Nils Lachmann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, H&I Laboratory, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Maximilian Jara
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Paul Viktor Ritschl
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Leke Wiering
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Dennis Eurich
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Christian Denecke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Matthias Biebl
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Sascha Chopra
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Safak Gül-Klein
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Petra Reinke
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Frank Tacke
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
| | - Tomasz Dziodzio
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (S.Ü.); (M.J.); (P.V.R.); (L.W.); (D.E.); (C.D.); (M.B.); (S.C.); (S.G.-K.); (W.S.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (R.Ö.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-(030)-450552001
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Herzer K, Sterneck M, Welker MW, Nadalin S, Kirchner G, Braun F, Malessa C, Herber A, Pratschke J, Weiss KH, Jaeckel E, Tacke F. Current Challenges in the Post-Transplant Care of Liver Transplant Recipients in Germany. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9113570. [PMID: 33167567 PMCID: PMC7694452 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Improving long-term patient and graft survival after liver transplantation (LT) remains a major challenge. Compared to the early phase after LT, long-term morbidity and mortality of the recipients not only depends on complications immediately related to the graft function, infections, or rejection, but also on medical factors such as de novo malignancies, metabolic disorders (e.g., new-onset diabetes, osteoporosis), psychiatric conditions (e.g., anxiety, depression), renal failure, and cardiovascular diseases. While a comprehensive post-transplant care at the LT center and the connected regional networks may improve outcome, there is currently no generally accepted standard to the post-transplant management of LT recipients in Germany. We therefore described the structure and standards of post-LT care by conducting a survey at 12 German LT centers including transplant hepatologists and surgeons. Aftercare structures and form of cost reimbursement considerably varied between LT centers across Germany. Further discussions and studies are required to define optimal structure and content of post-LT care systems, aiming at improving the long-term outcomes of LT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Herzer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
- Knappschafts-Klinik Bad Neuenahr, 53474 Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, Germany
| | - Martina Sterneck
- Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Martin-Walter Welker
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department for General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72016 Tuebingen, Germany;
| | - Gabriele Kirchner
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany;
- Innere Medizin I, Caritaskrankenhaus St. Josef, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Felix Braun
- Department for Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Christina Malessa
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany;
| | - Adam Herber
- Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
- Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Karl Heinz Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Department of Internal Medicine, Salem Medical Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elmar Jaeckel
- Integrated Research and Treatment Centre Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany;
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Tacke
- Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tanimine N, Ohira M, Tahara H, Ide K, Tanaka Y, Onoe T, Ohdan H. Strategies for Deliberate Induction of Immune Tolerance in Liver Transplantation: From Preclinical Models to Clinical Application. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1615. [PMID: 32849546 PMCID: PMC7412931 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The liver exhibits intrinsic immune regulatory properties that maintain tolerance to endogenous and exogenous antigens, and provide protection against pathogens. Such an immune privilege contributes to susceptibility to spontaneous acceptance despite major histocompatibility complex mismatch when transplanted in animal models. Furthermore, the presence of a liver allograft can suppress the rejection of other solid tissue/organ grafts from the same donor. Despite this immune privilege of the livers, to control the undesired alloimmune responses in humans, most liver transplant recipients require long-term treatment with immune-suppressive drugs that predispose to cardiometabolic side effects and renal insufficiency. Understanding the mechanism of liver transplant tolerance and crosstalk between a variety of hepatic immune cells, such as dendritic cells, Kupffer cells, liver sinusoidas endothelial cells, hepatic stellate cells and so on, and alloreactive T cells would lead to the development of strategies for deliberate induction of more specific immune tolerance in a clinical setting. In this review article, we focus on results derived from basic studies that have attempted to elucidate the immune modulatory mechanisms of liver constituent cells and clinical trials that induced immune tolerance after liver transplantation by utilizing the immune-privilege potential of the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Tanimine
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Masahiro Ohira
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.,Medical Center for Translational and Clinical Research Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tahara
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kentaro Ide
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yuka Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takashi Onoe
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.,Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, National Hospital Organization, Kure, Japan
| | - Hideki Ohdan
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Höfer A, Jonigk D, Hartleben B, Verboom M, Hallensleben M, Manns MP, Jaeckel E, Taubert R. Non-invasive screening for subclinical liver graft injury in adults via donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. Sci Rep 2020; 10:14242. [PMID: 32859929 PMCID: PMC7455737 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70938-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The majority of liver grafts exhibit abnormal histological findings late after transplantation, even when liver enzymes are normal. Such subclinical graft injuries were associated with rejection and fibrosis progression in recent studies. The identification of non-invasive biomarkers for subclinical graft injury might help to individualize immunosuppression. Therefore, graft injury was assessed in 133 liver biopsies with normal/near normal liver enzymes from a prospective liver biopsy program. Cytokeratin-18 cell death marker (M65) and donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) were measured as non-invasive markers in paired plasma samples in addition to routine parameters. M65 was associated with subclinical graft injury but this association was too weak for reasonable clinical application. DSA positivity was associated with more graft inflammation (OR = 5.4) and more fibrosis (OR = 4.2). Absence of DSA excluded fibrosis in 87–89%, while presence of DSA excluded histological criteria for immunosuppression minimization attempts in 92–97%. While CK18 cell death marker had no diagnostic value for the detection of subclinical liver graft injury, DSA testing can help to preselect patients for immunosuppression reduction in case of DSA negativity, while DSA positivity should prompt elastography or liver biopsy for the assessment of subclinical graft injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Höfer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,European Reference Network On Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), Hannover, Germany
| | - Danny Jonigk
- Institute for Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Björn Hartleben
- Institute for Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Murielle Verboom
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Hallensleben
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael P Manns
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,European Reference Network On Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), Hannover, Germany
| | - Elmar Jaeckel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,European Reference Network On Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), Hannover, Germany
| | - Richard Taubert
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. .,Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. .,European Reference Network On Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Willuweit K, Frey A, Bieniek L, Heinold A, Büchter M, Horn PA, Wedemeyer H, Herzer K. HLA class II donor specific antibodies are associated with graft cirrhosis after liver transplant independent of the mean fluorescence intensity level. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:288. [PMID: 32854625 PMCID: PMC7457295 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01427-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The importance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after liver transplantation (LT) for graft and patient survival is an ongoing controversy. So far it has not been elucidated when and in how far DSA are harmful for graft and patient survival. Therefore, we had the aim to investigate the association of DSA with complications after LT. Methods Data of 430 LT recipients were collected and statistically analyzed. Detection of HLA antibodies (Ab) was performed by Luminex assay. Results DSA were detected in 81 patients (18.8%). These were mainly HLA class II Ab (81.5%). HLA class II Ab show a higher MFI (median: 5.300) compared to HLA class I Ab (median: 2.300). There is no association between MFI levels and development of complications after LT. However, cirrhosis occurred significantly more often in DSA positive patients (18%) than in patients without detectable DSA (9%, P = 0.027). All DSA positive patients with cirrhosis of the graft showed HLA class II antibodies (OR: 3.028; 95% CI: 1.51–6.075; P = 0.002). Conclusion Occurrence of HLA class II DSA after LT is associated with graft cirrhosis and may indicate a higher risk to develop graft damage independent on MFI and requires an individualized risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Willuweit
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
| | - Alexandra Frey
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Lisa Bieniek
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Heinold
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Büchter
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine, St. Nikolaus Stiftshospital, Andernach Teaching Hospital, University of Bonn, Andernach, Germany
| | - Peter A Horn
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Kerstin Herzer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Levitsky J, Burrell BE, Kanaparthi S, Turka LA, Kurian S, Sanchez-Fueyo A, Lozano JJ, Demetris A, Lesniak A, Kirk AD, Stempora L, Yang GY, Mathew JM. Immunosuppression Withdrawal in Liver Transplant Recipients on Sirolimus. Hepatology 2020; 72:569-583. [PMID: 31721246 PMCID: PMC7217743 DOI: 10.1002/hep.31036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS As conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus (SRL), a mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTOR-I), has been shown to enhance immunoregulatory profiles in liver transplant (LT) recipients (LTRs), mTOR-I therapy might allow for increased success of immunosuppression (IS) withdrawal. Our aim was to determine if operational tolerance could be observed in LTRs withdrawn from SRL and if blood/graft tolerance biomarkers were predictive of successful withdrawal. APPROACH AND RESULTS We performed a prospective trial of SRL monotherapy withdrawal in nonimmune, nonviremic LTRs > 3 years post-LT. SRL was weaned over ~6 months, and biopsies were performed 12 months postweaning or at concern for acute rejection. Twenty-one LTRs consented; 6 were excluded due to subclinical acute rejection on baseline biopsy or other reasons, and 15 underwent weaning (age 61.3 ± 8.8 years; LT to SRL weaning 6.7 ± 3 years). Eight (53%) achieved operational tolerance (TOL). Of the 7 who were nontolerant (non-TOL), 6 had mild acute rejection on biopsy near the end of weaning or at study end; 1 was removed from the trial due to liver cancer recurrence. At baseline preweaning, there were statistically increased blood tolerogenic dendritic cells and cell phenotypes correlating with chronic antigen presentation in the TOL versus non-TOL groups. A previously identified biopsy gene signature accurately predicted TOL versus non-TOL in 12/14 LTRs before weaning. At study end, biopsy staining revealed statistically significant increases in antigen-presenting cell:leukocyte pairings, FOXP3+ /CD4+ T cells, Tbet+ /CD8+ T cells, and lobular dendritic cells in the non-TOL group. CONCLUSIONS This study evaluated IS withdrawal directly from mTOR-I therapy in LTRs and achieved > 50% operational tolerance. Preweaning gene expression and peripheral blood mononuclear cell profiling may be useful as predictors of successful mTOR-I therapy withdrawal. NCT02062944.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh Levitsky
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Laurence A. Turka
- Immune Tolerance Network, Bethesda, MD; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sunil Kurian
- Scripps Clinic Bio-Repository and Transplantation Research, La Jolla, California, United States
| | | | - Juan J. Lozano
- Biomedical Research Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases, Carlos III Health Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Guang-Yu Yang
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - James M. Mathew
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hann A, Osei-Bordom DC, Neil DAH, Ronca V, Warner S, Perera MTPR. The Human Immune Response to Cadaveric and Living Donor Liver Allografts. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1227. [PMID: 32655558 PMCID: PMC7323572 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The liver is an important contributor to the human immune system and it plays a pivotal role in the creation of both immunoreactive and tolerogenic conditions. Liver transplantation provides the best chance of survival for both children and adults with liver failure or cancer. With current demand exceeding the number of transplantable livers from donors following brain death, improved knowledge, technical advances and the desire to prevent avoidable deaths has led to the transplantation of organs from living, ABO incompatible (ABOi), cardiac death donors and machine based organ preservation with acceptable results. The liver graft is the most well-tolerated, from an immunological perspective, of all solid organ transplants. Evidence suggests successful cessation of immunosuppression is possible in ~20–40% of liver transplant recipients without immune mediated graft injury, a state known as “operational tolerance.” An immunosuppression free future following liver transplantation is an ambitious but perhaps not unachievable goal. The initial immune response following transplantation is a sterile inflammatory process mediated by the innate system and the mechanisms relate to the preservation-reperfusion process. The severity of this injury is influenced by graft factors and can have significant consequences. There are minimal experimental studies that delineate the differences in the adaptive immune response to the various forms of liver allograft. Apart from ABOi transplants, antibody mediated hyperacute rejection is rare following liver transplant. T-cell mediated rejection is common following liver transplantation and its incidence does not differ between living or deceased donor grafts. Transplantation in the first year of life results in a higher rate of operational tolerance, possibly due to a bias toward Th2 cytokines (IL4, IL10) during this period. This review further describes the current understanding of the immunological response toward liver allografts and highlight the areas of this topic yet to be fully understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angus Hann
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Desley A H Neil
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Vincenzo Ronca
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Suz Warner
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,The Liver Unit, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - M Thamara P R Perera
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,The Liver Unit, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kidney Rejection Following Simultaneous Liver-kidney Transplantation. Transplant Direct 2020; 6:e569. [PMID: 32766424 PMCID: PMC7339316 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Donor-specific antibodies are reported to increase the risk of rejection and reduce allograft survival following simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. Optimal immunosuppression regimens to reduce this risk and to treat rejection episodes are underinvestigated. Methods. Cohort analysis of the first 27 simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients, between 2014 and 2018 at our unit, is performed under a new risk stratification policy. Those with donor-specific antibodies to class II HLA with a mean fluorescence intensity >10 000 are considered high risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). These patients received immunosuppression, which consisted of induction therapy, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. All other patients are considered low risk and received tacrolimus and prednisolone alone. Results. Three patients were high risk for rejection, and 2 of these patients developed AMR, which was treated with plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin. At 1 y, their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were 50 and 59 mL/min. Two other patients developed AMR, which was similarly treated, and their 1-y eGFR was 31 and 50 mL/min. The overall histologically proven acute rejection rate within the first year was 33%, and median eGFR, for the 27 patients, at 1 y was 52 mL/min and at 2 y was 49 mL/min. Conclusions. This study confirms that there is a risk of AMR following simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation despite increased immunosuppression. This can be effectively treated with plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin.
Collapse
|
25
|
Influence of Preformed Antibodies in Liver Transplantation. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9030708. [PMID: 32151032 PMCID: PMC7141359 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching and preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplantation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the presence of DSAs in a large cohort of 810 liver recipients undergoing liver transplant to determine the influence on acute (AR) or chronic liver rejection (CR), graft loss and allograft survival. DSAs were identified using complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-CM) and multiplexed solid-phase-based flow cytometry assay (Luminex). CDC-CM showed that a 3.2% of liver transplants were positive (+CDC-CM) with an AR frequency of 19.2% which was not different from that observed in negative patients (-CDC-CM, 22.3%). Only two patients transplanted with +CDC-CM (7.6%) developed CR and suffered re-transplant. +CDC-CM patients showed a significantly lower survival rate compared to -CDC-CM patients (23.1% vs. 59.1%, p = 0.0003), developing allograft failure within the first three months (p < 0.00001). In conclusion, we have demonstrated a relationship between the presence of preformed DSAs and the low graft liver survival, indicating the important role and the potential interest of performing this analysis before liver transplantation. Our results could help to detect patients with an increased risk of graft loss, a better choice of liver receptors as well as the establishment of individualized immunosuppressive regimens.
Collapse
|
26
|
Nilles KM, Levitsky J. Donor-Specific Antibodies in Liver Transplantation. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2020; 15:13-16. [PMID: 32104571 PMCID: PMC7041955 DOI: 10.1002/cld.871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
http://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2046-2484/video/15-1-reading-nilles a video presentation of this article Answer questions and earn https://www.wileyhealthlearning.com/Activity/7025330/disclaimerspopup.aspx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy M. Nilles
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Comprehensive Transplant CenterNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIL
| | - Josh Levitsky
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Comprehensive Transplant CenterNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIL
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Choudhary NS, Saha SK, Saigal S, Gautam D, Saraf N, Rastogi A, Bhangui P, Thiagrajan S, Soin AS. Do Recipients of Genetically Related Donors Have Better Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation? J Clin Exp Hepatol 2020; 10:334-338. [PMID: 32655237 PMCID: PMC7335709 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2019.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few data on genetic relation of the donor and outcomes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. We compared outcomes of LDLT between recipients of genetically related and unrelated donors in a large single-center series. METHODS The study included 1372 adult, ABO-compatible, primary LDLT recipients, who received a graft from either a first-degree relative (parent, sibling, son, or daughter; n = 756) or unrelated donor (spouse or relative of the spouse; n = 616). RESULTS The mean age of the recipients with a related donor was 50.2 ± 10.8 years compared with 47.3 ± 9.3 years for recipients with unrelated donors (P = 0.000). Chronic rejection was significantly more common in the genetically unrelated donor group than in the genetically related donor group (28 [4.5%] versus 9 [1.1%]; P = 0.000) at a mean follow-up of 37 months (15-95 months). There were no significant differences in other outcomes between the 2 groups. The 12-month and 36-month survival between the unrelated and related groups was 87.6% versus 90%, and 86.3% versus 89.7% respectively (P = 0.115). The multivariate analysis revealed genetically unrelated donors (odds ratio [OR]: 3.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80-8.34, P = 0.001) and history of acute cellular rejection (OR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.68-6.81, P = 0.001) as predictors of chronic rejection. CONCLUSION Although chronic rejection was found to be more common in genetically unrelated donors, the patient survival after LDLT was similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra S. Choudhary
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta, the Medicity, India
| | - Sujeet K. Saha
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta, the Medicity, India
| | - Sanjiv Saigal
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta, the Medicity, India,Address for correspondence: Dr. Sanjiv Saigal Director, Transplant Hepatology Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta The Medicity, Gurgaon, 122001, India.
| | - Dheeraj Gautam
- Department of Histopathology, Medanta, the Medicity, Gurgaon, India
| | - Neeraj Saraf
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta, the Medicity, India
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta, the Medicity, India
| | - Prashant Bhangui
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta, the Medicity, India
| | - Srinivasan Thiagrajan
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta, the Medicity, India
| | - Arvinder S. Soin
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta, the Medicity, India
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Exploring pre-surgery donor-specific antibodies in the context of organ shortage in liver transplant. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:865-874. [PMID: 31748871 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01831-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing disparity between the number of liver transplant (LT) candidates and availability of suitable liver allografts. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), secondary to positive donor-specific antibodies (DSA), remains a concern in liver transplantation. This study aimed to correlate expression of DSA on pre-transplant screening and outcomes of LT, specifically development of AMR in liver allografts and liver function profile in the post-operative period. METHODS Data of consecutive patients undergoing orthotopic LT (OLT) at the South Australian Liver Transplant Unit was analysed. All patients underwent DSA testing pre-transplant. RESULTS Within a cohort of 96 patients, over a post-OLT median follow-up of 849 days, only 2 patients (2%) developed AMR. While both patients had a positive DSA test preoperatively, overall DSA positivity was noted in 31% patients, with a specificity for prediction of AMR of 0.708. No significant association was noted between AMR (p = 0.092), T cell-mediated rejection/TCMR (p = 0.797) or late hepatic artery thrombosis/LHAT (p = 0.521). There was no significant interaction effect between DSA positivity and serum bilirubin or transaminases over a period of 100 days. CONCLUSION AMR following LT is uncommon. A positive DSA pre-transplant does not imply a definite risk of AMR. Also, there does not exist a significant interaction in time between DSA expression and serum bilirubin or transaminase levels. Until there emerges evidence to the contrary, it appears reasonable to consider DSA-positive donors within the broad context of marginal donors in the context of a worldwide shortage of LT donor allografts.
Collapse
|
29
|
Thorgersen EB, Barratt‐Due A, Haugaa H, Harboe M, Pischke SE, Nilsson PH, Mollnes TE. The Role of Complement in Liver Injury, Regeneration, and Transplantation. Hepatology 2019; 70:725-736. [PMID: 30653682 PMCID: PMC6771474 DOI: 10.1002/hep.30508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The liver is both an immunologically complex and a privileged organ. The innate immune system is a central player, in which the complement system emerges as a pivotal part of liver homeostasis, immune responses, and crosstalk with other effector systems in both innate and adaptive immunity. The liver produces the majority of the complement proteins and is the home of important immune cells such as Kupffer cells. Liver immune responses are delicately tuned between tolerance to many antigens flowing in from the alimentary tract, a tolerance that likely makes the liver less prone to rejection than other solid organ transplants, and reaction to local injury, systemic inflammation, and regeneration. Notably, complement is a double-edged sword as activation is detrimental by inducing inflammatory tissue damage in, for example, ischemia-reperfusion injury and transplant rejection yet is beneficial for liver tissue regeneration. Therapeutic complement inhibition is rapidly developing for routine clinical treatment of several diseases. In the liver, targeted inhibition of damaged tissue may be a rational and promising approach to avoid further tissue destruction and simultaneously preserve beneficial effects of complement in areas of proliferation. Here, we argue that complement is a key system to manipulate in the liver in several clinical settings, including liver injury and regeneration after major surgery and preservation of the organ during transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebbe Billmann Thorgersen
- Department of ImmunologyOslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet and University of OsloOsloNorway,Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryThe Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Andreas Barratt‐Due
- Department of ImmunologyOslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet and University of OsloOsloNorway,Division of Emergencies and Critical CareOslo University Hospital RikshospitaletOsloNorway
| | - Håkon Haugaa
- Division of Emergencies and Critical CareOslo University Hospital RikshospitaletOsloNorway,Lovisenberg Diaconal University CollegeOsloNorway
| | - Morten Harboe
- Department of ImmunologyOslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet and University of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Søren Erik Pischke
- Department of ImmunologyOslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet and University of OsloOsloNorway,Division of Emergencies and Critical CareOslo University Hospital RikshospitaletOsloNorway
| | - Per H. Nilsson
- Department of ImmunologyOslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet and University of OsloOsloNorway,Linnaeus Centre for Biomaterials ChemistryLinnaeus UniversityKalmarSweden
| | - Tom Eirik Mollnes
- Department of ImmunologyOslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet and University of OsloOsloNorway,Reserach Laboratory, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, and Faculty of Health Sciences, K.G. Jebsen TRECUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway,Centre of Molecular Inflammation ResearchNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Levitsky J. Does the Liver Provide Immunosuppressive Advantage? Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2019; 13:180-183. [PMID: 31316766 PMCID: PMC6605736 DOI: 10.1002/cld.817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Josh Levitsky
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Comprehensive Transplant CenterNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIL
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Campbell KR, Juarez-Colunga E, Grunwald GK, Cooper J, Davis S, Gralla J. Comparison of a time-varying covariate model and a joint model of time-to-event outcomes in the presence of measurement error and interval censoring: application to kidney transplantation. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19:130. [PMID: 31242848 PMCID: PMC6595621 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0773-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressant drug given to kidney transplant recipients post-transplant to prevent antibody formation and kidney rejection. The optimal therapeutic dose for TAC is poorly defined and therapy requires frequent monitoring of drug trough levels. Analyzing the association between TAC levels over time and the development of potentially harmful de novo donor specific antibodies (dnDSA) is complex because TAC levels are subject to measurement error and dnDSA is assessed at discrete times, so it is an interval censored time-to-event outcome. Methods Using data from the University of Colorado Transplant Center, we investigated the association between TAC and dnDSA using a shared random effects (intercept and slope) model with longitudinal and interval censored survival sub-models (JM) and compared it with the more traditional interval censored survival model with a time-varying covariate (TVC). We carried out simulations to compare bias, level and power for the association parameter in the TVC and JM under varying conditions of measurement error and interval censoring. In addition, using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods allowed us to calculate clinically relevant quantities along with credible intervals (CrI). Results The shared random effects model was a better fit and showed both the average TAC and the slope of TAC were associated with risk of dnDSA. The simulation studies demonstrated that, in the presence of heavy interval censoring and high measurement error, the TVC survival model underestimates the association between the survival and longitudinal measurement and has inflated type I error and considerably less power to detect associations. Conclusions To avoid underestimating associations, shared random effects models should be used in analyses of data with interval censoring and measurement error. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0773-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen R Campbell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, Colorado, USA
| | - Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, Colorado, USA. .,Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, Colorado, USA.
| | - Gary K Grunwald
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, Colorado, USA
| | - James Cooper
- Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, Colorado, USA
| | - Scott Davis
- Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, Colorado, USA
| | - Jane Gralla
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, Colorado, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 80045, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wozniak LJ, Venick RS. Donor-specific antibodies following liver and intestinal transplantation: Clinical significance, pathogenesis and recommendations. Int Rev Immunol 2019; 38:106-117. [DOI: 10.1080/08830185.2019.1630404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J. Wozniak
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert S. Venick
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Xu Q, Shrum B, Leckie S, Skaro A, McAlister VC. The impact of alloantibodies directed against the second donor on long-term outcomes of repeat liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2019; 8:246-252. [PMID: 31245404 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.01.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Despite reports that associate donor specific antibody (DSA) with rejection after liver transplantation, grafts are still allocated according to blood group (ABO) but not human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility, possibly due to the absence of an easily discernible clinical association between adverse recipient outcome and DSA. Re-transplantation provides a test environment where the presence of preformed DSA is prevalent and its effect on outcome should be apparent. Methods All patients undergoing a second liver transplantation with available pre-operative serum were included with the exception of ABO incompatible or multiple organ transplants. Banked sera were tested for anti-HLA antibodies with Luminex-based solid phase assays. Anti-HLA antibodies to the second donor (D2SA) were determined using antibodies specificity and HLA typing of 2nd liver donor. Results Preformed HLA antibodies directed to second liver transplantation (D2SA) were found in 31 (39%) of the 79 patients that were included in the study. Primary and re-transplantation characteristics were similar in both subgroups except first graft survival which was significantly shorter in recipients who are negative for D2SA. Mean survival of the second graft was similar in D2SA+ and D2SA- cohorts [8.55 (range, 0.01-24.74) vs. 7.56 (range, 0-23.53) years respectively, P=0.574]. Mean patient survival after 2nd liver transplantation was similar in D2SA+ and D2SA- cohorts [9.11 (range, 0.01-24.74) vs. 8.10 (range, 0-23.53) years respectively, P=0.504]. Subgroup univariate analysis demonstrated no detrimental effect of class, locus, or strength of D2SA on survival of the second liver transplant. In multivariate cox regression model, neither class I D2DSA (HR =1.101, P=0.92) nor class II D2SA (HR =1.74, P=0.359) were significant risks of graft failure. Conclusions Presence of D2SA was not found to be associated with inferior outcomes in this retrospective cohort study of liver re-transplantation suggesting that changes to the allocation system are not required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyong Xu
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Brad Shrum
- Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Steve Leckie
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Anton Skaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Vivian C McAlister
- Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
De novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation is a major problem in transplantation, and associated with long-term graft decline and loss as well as sensitization, limiting future transplant options. Forming high-affinity, long-lived antibody responses involves a process called the germinal center (GC) reaction, and requires interaction between several cell types, including GC B cells, T follicular helper (Tfh) and T follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells. T follicular regulatory cells are an essential component of the GC reaction, limiting its size and reducing nonspecific or self-reactive responses.An imbalance between helper function and regulatory function can lead to excessive antibody production. High proportions of Tfh cells have been associated with DSA formation in transplantation; therefore, Tfr cells are likely to play an important role in limiting DSA production. Understanding the signals that govern Tfr cell development and the balance between helper and regulatory function within the GC is key to understanding how these cells might be manipulated to reduce the risk of DSA development.This review discusses the development and function of Tfr cells and their relevance to transplantation. In particular how current and future immunosuppressive strategies might allow us to skew the ratio between Tfr and Tfh cells to increase or decrease the risk of de novo DSA formation.
Collapse
|
35
|
Chhabra M, Alsughayyir J, Qureshi MS, Mallik M, Ali JM, Gamper I, Moseley EL, Peacock S, Kosmoliaptsis V, Goddard MJ, Linterman MA, Motallebzadeh R, Pettigrew GJ. Germinal Center Alloantibody Responses Mediate Progression of Chronic Allograft Injury. Front Immunol 2019; 9:3038. [PMID: 30728823 PMCID: PMC6351502 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Different profiles of alloantibody responses are observed in the clinic, with those that persist, often despite targeted treatment, associated with poorer long-term transplant outcomes. Although such responses would suggest an underlying germinal center (GC) response, the relationship to cellular events within the allospecific B cell population is unclear. Here we examine the contribution of germinal center (GC) humoral alloimmunity to chronic antibody mediated rejection (AMR). A murine model of chronic AMR was developed in which T cell deficient (Tcrbd-/-) C57BL/6 recipients were challenged with MHC-mismatched BALB/c heart allografts and T cell help provided by reconstituting with 103 "TCR75" CD4 T cells that recognize self-restricted allopeptide derived from the H-2Kd MHC class I alloantigen. Reconstituted recipients developed Ig-switched anti-Kd alloantibody responses that were slow to develop, but long-lived, with confocal immunofluorescence and flow cytometric characterization of responding H-2Kd-allospecific B cells confirming persistent splenic GC activity. This was associated with T follicular helper (TFH) cell differentiation of the transferred TCR75 CD4 T cells. Heart grafts developed progressive allograft vasculopathy, and were rejected chronically (MST 50 days), with explanted allografts displaying features of humoral vascular rejection. Critically, late alloantibody responses were abolished, and heart grafts survived indefinitely, in recipients reconstituted with Sh2d1a-/- TCR75 CD4 T cells that were genetically incapable of providing TFH cell function. The GC response was associated with affinity maturation of the anti-Kd alloantibody response, and its contribution to progression of allograft vasculopathy related principally to secretion of alloantibody, rather than to enhanced alloreactive T cell priming, because grafts survived long-term when B cells could present alloantigen, but not secrete alloantibody. Similarly, sera sampled at late time points from chronically-rejecting recipients induced more vigorous donor endothelial responses in vitro than sera sampled earlier after transplantation. In summary, our results suggest that chronic AMR and progression of allograft vasculopathy is dependent upon allospecific GC activity, with critical help provided by TFH cells. Clinical strategies that target the TFH cell subset may hold therapeutic potential. This work is composed of two parts, of which this is Part II. Please read also Part I: Alsughayyir et al., 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manu Chhabra
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jawaher Alsughayyir
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M. Saeed Qureshi
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Mekhola Mallik
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jason M. Ali
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ivonne Gamper
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ellen L. Moseley
- Department of Pathology, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Peacock
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Martin J. Goddard
- Department of Pathology, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle A. Linterman
- Laboratory of Lymphocyte Signalling and Development, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Reza Motallebzadeh
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Transplantation, Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gavin J. Pettigrew
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Feng S, Bucuvalas JC, Demetris AJ, Burrell BE, Spain KM, Kanaparthi S, Magee JC, Ikle D, Lesniak A, Lozano JJ, Alonso EM, Bray RA, Bridges NE, Doo E, Gebel HM, Gupta NA, Himes RW, Jackson AM, Lobritto SJ, Mazariegos GV, Ng VL, Rand EB, Sherker AH, Sundaram S, Turmelle YP, Sanchez-Fueyo A. Evidence of Chronic Allograft Injury in Liver Biopsies From Long-term Pediatric Recipients of Liver Transplants. Gastroenterology 2018; 155:1838-1851.e7. [PMID: 30144432 PMCID: PMC6279538 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS A substantial proportion of pediatric liver transplant recipients develop subclinical chronic allograft injury. We studied whether there are distinct patterns of injury based on histopathologic features and identified associated immunologic profiles. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study of 157 stable, long-term pediatric recipients of transplanted livers (70 boys; > 6 years old at time of transplantation; mean, 8.9 ± 3.46 years after liver transplantation) who underwent liver biopsy analysis from August 13, 2012, through May 1, 2014. Participants had received livers from a living or deceased donor and had consistently normal results from liver tests. Liver biopsy specimens were scored by a central pathologist; an unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis of histologic features was used to sort biopsy samples into 3 clusters. We conducted transcriptional and cytometric analyses of liver tissue samples and performed a systems biology analysis that incorporated clinical, serologic, histologic, and transcriptional data. RESULTS The mean level of alanine aminotransferase in participants was 27.6 ± 14.57 U/L, and the mean level of γ-glutamyl transferase was 17.4 ± 7.93 U/L. Cluster 1 was characterized by interface activity (n = 34), cluster 2 was characterized by periportal or perivenular fibrosis without interface activity (n = 45), and cluster 3 had neither feature (n = 78). We identified a module of genes whose expression correlated with levels of alanine aminotransferase, class II donor-specific antibody, portal inflammation, interface activity, perivenular inflammation, portal and perivenular fibrosis, and cluster assignment. The module was enriched in genes that regulate T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) of liver and other transplanted organs. Functional pathway analysis showed overrepresentation of TCMR gene sets for cluster 1 but not clusters 2 or 3. CONCLUSION In an analysis of biopsies from an apparently homogeneous group of stable, long-term pediatric liver transplant recipients with consistently normal liver test results, we found evidence of chronic graft injury (inflammation and/or fibrosis). Biopsy samples with interface activity had a gene expression pattern associated with TCMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Feng
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| | - John C. Bucuvalas
- Pediatric Liver Care Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | | | | | | | | | - John C. Magee
- Section of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Andrew Lesniak
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Juan J. Lozano
- Biomedical Research Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases, Carlos III Health Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Estella M. Alonso
- Siragusa Transplantation Center, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert A. Bray
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Nancy E. Bridges
- Transplantation Branch; Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, MD
| | - Edward Doo
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Howard M. Gebel
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Nitika A. Gupta
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ryan W. Himes
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Annette M. Jackson
- Division of Immunogenetics and Transplantation Immunology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Steven J. Lobritto
- Center for Liver Diseases and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - George V. Mazariegos
- Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Vicky L. Ng
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth B. Rand
- Liver Transplant Program, The Children’s Hospital of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Averell H. Sherker
- Siragusa Transplantation Center, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Shikha Sundaram
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Children’s Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Yumirle P. Turmelle
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, St. Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Donor-specific Antibodies, Immunoglobulin-free Light Chains, and BAFF Levels in Relation to Risk of Late-onset PTLD in Liver Recipients. Transplant Direct 2018; 4:e353. [PMID: 30123826 PMCID: PMC6089512 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a neoplastic complication of transplantation, with early cases largely due to immunosuppression and primary Epstein-Barr virus infection. Etiology may differ for later-onset cases, but the contributions of immunosuppression, immune reactivity to the donor organ, and chronic B cell activation are uncertain. Methods We conducted a case-control study of late-onset PTLD (diagnosed >1 year posttransplant) in a cohort of liver recipients. We assessed serum samples (obtained >6 months before diagnosis in cases) from N = 60 cases and N = 166 matched controls for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs, evaluable for N = 221 subjects), immunoglobulin kappa and lambda free light chains (FLCs, N = 137), and B cell activating factor (BAFF, N = 226). Conditional or unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs). Results Circulating DSAs were less common in PTLD cases than controls (18% vs 30%), although this difference was borderline significant (aOR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-1.10; P = 0.09). Donor-specific antibodies against class II HLA antigens predominated and likewise showed a borderline inverse association with PTLD (aOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.27-1.24). The FLC levels were less frequently abnormal in cases than controls, but measurements were available for only a subset and confidence intervals were wide (elevated kappa: aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.15-2.12; P = 0.40; elevated lambda: aOR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.30-1.50; P = 0.34). B cell–activating factor levels were not associated with PTLD. Conclusions Our results suggest that circulating DSAs are associated with decreased risk of late-onset PTLD. Because DSAs may develop in the setting of underimmunosuppression, the inverse association with DSAs supports a role for immunosuppression in the etiology of late-onset PTLD.
Collapse
|
38
|
Roders N, Herr F, Ambroise G, Thaunat O, Portier A, Vazquez A, Durrbach A. SYK Inhibition Induces Apoptosis in Germinal Center-Like B Cells by Modulating the Antiapoptotic Protein Myeloid Cell Leukemia-1, Affecting B-Cell Activation and Antibody Production. Front Immunol 2018; 9:787. [PMID: 29740433 PMCID: PMC5928208 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
B cells play a major role in the antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of solid organ transplants, a major public health concern. The germinal center (GC) is involved in the generation of donor-specific antibody-producing plasma cells and memory B cells, which are often poorly controlled by current treatments. Myeloid cell leukemia-1 (Mcl-1), an antiapoptotic member of the B-cell lymphoma-2 family, is essential for maintenance of the GC reaction and B-cell differentiation. During chronic AMR (cAMR), tertiary lymphoid structures resembling GCs appear in the rejected organ, suggesting local lymphoid neogenesis. We report the infiltration of the kidneys with B cells expressing Mcl-1 in patients with cAMR. We modulated GC viability by impairing B-cell receptor signaling, by spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibition. SYK inhibition lowers viability and Mcl-1 protein levels in Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines. This downregulation of Mcl-1 is coordinated at the transcriptional level, possibly by signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), as shown by (1) the impaired translocation of STAT3 to the nucleus following SYK inhibition, and (2) the lower levels of Mcl-1 transcription upon STAT3 inhibition. Mcl-1 overproduction prevented cells from entering apoptosis following SYK inhibition. In vitro studies with primary tonsillar B cells confirmed that SYK inhibition impaired cell survival and decreased Mcl-1 protein levels. It also impaired B-cell activation and immunoglobulin G secretion by tonsillar B cells. These findings suggest that the SYK-Mcl-1 pathway could be targeted, to improve graft survival by manipulating the humoral immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Roders
- Institut Francilien de Recherche en Nephrologie et Transplantation (IFRNT), Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.,INSERM UMRS-MD 1197, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris Sud, Orsay, France
| | - Florence Herr
- Institut Francilien de Recherche en Nephrologie et Transplantation (IFRNT), Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.,INSERM UMRS-MD 1197, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris Sud, Orsay, France
| | | | - Olivier Thaunat
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1111, Lyon, France.,Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France.,Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Alain Portier
- INSERM UMRS-MD 1197, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris Sud, Orsay, France
| | - Aimé Vazquez
- INSERM UMRS-MD 1197, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris Sud, Orsay, France
| | - Antoine Durrbach
- Institut Francilien de Recherche en Nephrologie et Transplantation (IFRNT), Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.,INSERM UMRS-MD 1197, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris Sud, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bouquegneau A, Loheac C, Aubert O, Bouatou Y, Viglietti D, Empana J, Ulloa C, Hassan Murad M, Legendre C, Glotz D, Jackson AM, Zeevi A, Schaub S, Taupin J, Reed EF, Friedewald JJ, Tyan DB, Süsal C, Shapiro R, Woodle ES, Hidalgo LG, O’Leary J, Montgomery RA, Kobashigawa J, Jouven X, Jabre P, Lefaucheur C, Loupy A. Complement-activating donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and solid organ transplant survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2018; 15:e1002572. [PMID: 29799874 PMCID: PMC5969739 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (anti-HLA DSAs) are recognized as a major barrier to patients' access to organ transplantation and the major cause of graft failure. The capacity of circulating anti-HLA DSAs to activate complement has been suggested as a potential biomarker for optimizing graft allocation and improving the rate of successful transplantations. METHODS AND FINDINGS To address the clinical relevance of complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs across all solid organ transplant patients, we performed a meta-analysis of their association with transplant outcome through a systematic review, from inception to January 31, 2018. The primary outcome was allograft loss, and the secondary outcome was allograft rejection. A comprehensive search strategy was conducted through several databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus). A total of 5,861 eligible citations were identified. A total of 37 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Studies reported on 7,936 patients, including kidney (n = 5,991), liver (n = 1,459), heart (n = 370), and lung recipients (n = 116). Solid organ transplant recipients with circulating complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs experienced an increased risk of allograft loss (pooled HR 3.09; 95% CI 2.55-3.74, P = 0.001; I2 = 29.3%), and allograft rejection (pooled HR 3.75; 95% CI: 2.05-6.87, P = 0.001; I2 = 69.8%) compared to patients without complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs. The association between circulating complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs and allograft failure was consistent across all subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Limitations of the study are the observational and retrospective design of almost all included studies, the higher proportion of kidney recipients compared to other solid organ transplant recipients, and the inclusion of fewer studies investigating allograft rejection. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we found that circulating complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs had a significant deleterious impact on solid organ transplant survival and risk of rejection. The detection of complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs may add value at an individual patient level for noninvasive biomarker-guided risk stratification. TRIAL REGISTRATION National Clinical Trial protocol ID: NCT03438058.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Bouquegneau
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Loheac
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris Descartes University, and Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP–HP), Paris, France
| | - Yassine Bouatou
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
- Division of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Denis Viglietti
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Saint–Louis Hospital, Paris Diderot University, AP–HP, Paris, France
| | - Jean–Philippe Empana
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
| | - Camilo Ulloa
- Hospital Barros Luco Trudeau, Santiago, Chile et Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Chile
| | - Mohammad Hassan Murad
- Mayo Clinic Evidence–based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris Descartes University, and Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP–HP), Paris, France
| | - Denis Glotz
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Saint–Louis Hospital, Paris Diderot University, AP–HP, Paris, France
| | - Annette M. Jackson
- Immunogenetics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Pathology, Surgery and Immunology at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Stephan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jean–Luc Taupin
- Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, CHU Paris–GH St–Louis Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - Elaine F. Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Immunogenetics Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - John J. Friedewald
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Division of Transplant Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, United states of America
| | - Dolly B. Tyan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Caner Süsal
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University, Department of Transplantation Immunology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ron Shapiro
- Kidney/Pancreas Transplant Program, Mount Sinai Hospital, Recanati Miller Transplantation Institute, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - E. Steve Woodle
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Luis G. Hidalgo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jacqueline O’Leary
- Annette C. & Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
| | - Robert A. Montgomery
- The NYU Transplant Institute, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Jon Kobashigawa
- Cedars–Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Xavier Jouven
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
- Department of Cardiology and Global Health Unit European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris
| | - Patricia Jabre
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
- SAMU of Paris, Necker Hospital Paris, France
- Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
- AP–HP, Paris, France
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Saint–Louis Hospital, Paris Diderot University, AP–HP, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris Descartes University, and Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP–HP), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Impact of Antibodies That React With Liver Tissue and Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies in Pediatric Idiopathic Posttransplantation Hepatitis. Transplantation 2017; 101:1074-1083. [PMID: 28118175 PMCID: PMC5642348 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Background The cause of late graft dysfunction has not been elucidated. Although an antibody-mediated reaction is suspected as a potential mechanism, the target antigens have not been clarified. Methods To clarify the etiology of idiopathic posttransplantation hepatitis (IPTH), we simultaneously examined the presence of antibodies that react with liver tissue (ARLT) by means of indirect immunofluorescence staining, as well as the presence of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLA-DSA). A subanalysis of the IPTH group was also performed. Within the IPTH group, the correlation between ARLT titer and clinical data were analyzed. Results In the sera of patients with IPTH (30 patients), ARLT were found at a significantly higher frequency than in patients without IPTH (42 patients; P < 0.001). Moreover, the ARLT titer appeared to be correlated with the severity of hepatitis or hepatic injury. In contrast, the frequency of HLA-DSA was significantly lower in patients with IPTH than in patients without IPTH (P = 0.001). Conclusion Our findings indicate that ARLT, and not HLA-DSA, profoundly influence the etiology of IPTH. The authors show that antibodies that react with liver tissue and not donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, profoundly influence the etiology of idiopathic posttransplantation hepatitis in children providing a rationale for therapy.
Collapse
|
41
|
Impact of the Trough Level of Calcineurin Inhibitor on the Prevalence of Donor-Specific Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies During Long-Term Follow-Up After Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Antibody Strength and Complement-Binding Ability. Transplant Direct 2017; 3:e196. [PMID: 28795147 PMCID: PMC5540634 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Revised: 06/15/2017] [Accepted: 06/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In pediatric patients, long-term immunosuppression after liver transplantation (LT) is typically minimal. However, posttransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) may be prevalent under these conditions. Here, we evaluated the effects of minimized calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) on DSA development to assess the validity of minimized/withdrawn immunosuppression. Methods We retrospectively examined 66 patients who underwent pediatric LT at our institution between July 1991 and October 2013. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the CNI trough level. The cutoff trough levels were 3 and 30 ng/mL for tacrolimus and cyclosporine, respectively. Luminex single-antigen bead assays were performed, and the cutoff for a positive reaction was set at a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of at least 1000. Results The mean recipient ages at the time of LT were 29.1 and 77.2 months for the low and regular CNI groups, respectively (P = 0.0007). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that recipient age at LT younger than 3 years (P = 0.0099) and low CNI (P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with DSA development. In multivariate analysis, low CNI was an independent risk factor of DSA development (P = 0.0011). Of 15 high-MFI DSAs, 3 were anti-DR, and 12 were anti-DQ. Two of 3 anti-DR DSAs and 11 of 12 anti-DQ DSAs had complement-binding ability and high MFIs. Conclusions CNI minimization was an independent risk factor for posttransplant DSA during long-term follow-up after pediatric LT. Adjusting CNI to appropriate levels is a safe first step to prevent the immunological effects of DSA.
Collapse
|
42
|
Valenzuela NM, Reed EF. Antibody-mediated rejection across solid organ transplants: manifestations, mechanisms, and therapies. J Clin Invest 2017; 127:2492-2504. [PMID: 28604384 DOI: 10.1172/jci90597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation is a curative therapy for hundreds of thousands of patients with end-stage organ failure. However, long-term outcomes have not improved, and nearly half of transplant recipients will lose their allografts by 10 years after transplant. One of the major challenges facing clinical transplantation is antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) caused by anti-donor HLA antibodies. AMR is highly associated with graft loss, but unfortunately there are few efficacious therapies to prevent and reverse AMR. This Review describes the clinical and histological manifestations of AMR, and discusses the immunopathological mechanisms contributing to antibody-mediated allograft injury as well as current and emerging therapies.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Complement is a major contributor to inflammation and graft injury. This system is especially important in ischemia-reperfusion injury/delayed graft function as well as in acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The latter is increasingly recognized as a major cause of late graft loss, for which we have few effective therapies. C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) regulates several pathways which contribute to both acute and chronic graft injuries. However, C1-INH spares the alternative pathway and the membrane attack complex (C5–9) so innate antibacterial defenses remain intact. Plasma-derived C1-INH has been used to treat hereditary angioedema for more than 30 years with excellent safety. Studies with C1-INH in transplant recipients are limited, but have not revealed any unique toxicity or serious adverse events attributed to the protein. Extensive data from animal and ex vivo models suggest that C1-INH ameliorates ischemia-reperfusion injury. Initial clinical studies suggest this effect may allow transplantation of donor organs which are now discarded because the risk of primary graft dysfunction is considered too great. Although the incidence of severe early AMR is declining, accumulating evidence strongly suggests that complement is an important mediator of chronic AMR, a major cause of late graft loss. Thus, C1-INH may also be helpful in preserving function of established grafts. Early clinical studies in transplantation suggest significant beneficial effects of C1-INH with minimal toxicity. Recent results encourage continued investigation of this already-available therapeutic agent.
Collapse
|
44
|
mTOR Inhibition Suppresses Posttransplant Alloantibody Production Through Direct Inhibition of Alloprimed B Cells and Sparing of CD8+ Antibody-Suppressing T cells. Transplantation 2017; 100:1898-906. [PMID: 27362313 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND De novo alloantibodies (donor-specific antibody) contribute to antibody-mediated rejection and poor long-term graft survival. Because the development of donor-specific antibody is associated with early graft loss of cell transplants and reduced long-term survival of solid organ transplants, we hypothesized that conventional immunosuppressives, calcineurin inhibitors (CNi), and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi), may not be as effective for suppression of humoral alloimmunity as for cell-mediated immunity. METHODS Wild-type or CD8-depleted mice were transplanted with allogeneic hepatocytes. Recipients were treated with mTORi and/or CNi and serially monitored for alloantibody and graft survival. The direct effect of mTORi and CNi on alloprimed B cell function was investigated in Rag1 mice adoptively transferred with alloprimed IgG1 B cells. The efficacy of mTORi and/or CNi to suppress CD8-mediated cytotoxicity of IgG1 B cells was evaluated in in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity assays. RESULTS Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, but not CNi, reduced alloantibody production in transplant recipients, directly suppressed alloantibody production by alloprimed IgG1 B cells and delayed graft rejection in both low and high alloantibody producers. Combination treatment with mTORi and CNi resulted in loss of the inhibitory effect observed for mTORi monotherapy in part due to CNi suppression of CD8 T cells which downregulate alloantibody production (CD8 TAb-supp cells). CONCLUSIONS Our data support that mTORi is a potent inhibitor of humoral immunity through suppression of alloprimed B cells and preservation of CD8 TAb-supp cells. In contrast, alloantibody is readily detected in CNi-treated recipients because CNi does not suppress alloprimed B cells and interferes with downregulatory CD8 TAb-supp cells.
Collapse
|
45
|
Feng S, Demetris AJ, Spain KM, Kanaparthi S, Burrell BE, Ekong UD, Alonso EM, Rosenthal P, Turka LA, Ikle D, Tchao NK. Five-year histological and serological follow-up of operationally tolerant pediatric liver transplant recipients enrolled in WISP-R. Hepatology 2017; 65:647-660. [PMID: 27302659 PMCID: PMC5159322 DOI: 10.1002/hep.28681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2015] [Revised: 05/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Pediatric liver transplant recipients arguably have the most to gain and the most to lose from discontinuing immunosuppression (IS). Whereas IS undoubtedly exerts a cumulative toll, there is concern that insufficient or no IS may contribute to allograft deterioration. Twelve pediatric recipients of parental living donor liver grafts, identified as operationally tolerant through complete IS withdrawal (WISP-R; NCT00320606), were followed for a total of 5 years (1 year of IS withdrawal and 4 years off IS) with serial liver tests and autoantibody and alloantibody assessments. Liver biopsies were performed 2 and 4 years off IS, and, at these time points, immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclass and C1q binding activity for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were determined. There were no cases of chronic rejection, graft loss, or death. Allografts did not exhibit progressive increase in inflammation or fibrosis. Smooth-muscle actin expression by stellate cells and CD34 expression by liver sinusoidal endothelial cells remained stable, consistent with the absence of progressive graft injury. Three subjects never exhibited DSA. However, 3 subjects showed intermittent de novo class I DSA, 4 subjects showed persistent de novo class II DSA, and 5 subjects showed persistent preexisting class II DSA. Class II DSA was predominantly against donor DQ antigens, often of high mean fluorescence intensity, rarely of the IgG3 subclass, and often capable of binding C1q. CONCLUSION Operationally tolerant pediatric liver transplant recipients maintain generally stable allograft histology in spite of apparently active humoral allo-immune responses. The absence of increased inflammation or progressive fibrosis suggests that a subset of liver allografts seem resistant to the chronic injury that is characteristic of antibody-mediated damage. (Hepatology 2017;65:647-660).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Feng
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Udeme D. Ekong
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CO
| | - Estella M. Alonso
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Philip Rosenthal
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA,Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Karahan GE, Claas FHJ, Heidt S. B Cell Immunity in Solid Organ Transplantation. Front Immunol 2017; 7:686. [PMID: 28119695 PMCID: PMC5222792 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The contribution of B cells to alloimmune responses is gradually being understood in more detail. We now know that B cells can perpetuate alloimmune responses in multiple ways: (i) differentiation into antibody-producing plasma cells; (ii) sustaining long-term humoral immune memory; (iii) serving as antigen-presenting cells; (iv) organizing the formation of tertiary lymphoid organs; and (v) secreting pro- as well as anti-inflammatory cytokines. The cross-talk between B cells and T cells in the course of immune responses forms the basis of these diverse functions. In the setting of organ transplantation, focus has gradually shifted from T cells to B cells, with an increased notion that B cells are more than mere precursors of antibody-producing plasma cells. In this review, we discuss the various roles of B cells in the generation of alloimmune responses beyond antibody production, as well as possibilities to specifically interfere with B cell activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonca E Karahan
- Department of Immunohaematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , Netherlands
| | - Frans H J Claas
- Department of Immunohaematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunohaematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
The Role of Humoral Alloreactivity in Liver Transplantation: Lessons Learned and New Perspectives. J Immunol Res 2017; 2017:3234906. [PMID: 28164136 PMCID: PMC5253491 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3234906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
More than ten years after the initial description of the humoral theory of transplantation by Dr. Paul I. Terasaki, the significance of humoral alloimmunity in liver transplantation has yet to be clearly defined. The liver allograft has an inherent tolerogenic capacity which confers its resistance to cell-mediated as well as antibody-mediated rejection. Nevertheless, the protection against alloimmunity is not complete, and antibody-mediated tissue injury can occur in the liver graft under specific circumstances. In this article the evidence on the clinicopathologic effects of donor-specific alloantibodies in liver transplantation will be examined and interpreted in parallel with lessons learned from renal transplantation. The unique anatomic and immunologic features of the liver will be reviewed to gain new insights into the complex interactions between humoral immune system and the liver allograft.
Collapse
|
48
|
Matsuda Y, Sarwal MM. Unraveling the Role of Allo-Antibodies and Transplant Injury. Front Immunol 2016; 7:432. [PMID: 27818660 PMCID: PMC5073555 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2016] [Accepted: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Alloimmunity driving rejection in the context of solid organ transplantation can be grossly divided into mechanisms predominantly driven by either T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), though the co-existence of both types of rejections can be seen in a variable number of sampled grafts. Acute TCMR can generally be well controlled by the establishment of effective immunosuppression (1, 2). Acute ABMR is a low frequency finding in the current era of blood group and HLA donor/recipient matching and the avoidance of engraftment in the context of high-titer, preformed donor-specific antibodies. However, chronic ABMR remains a major complication resulting in the untimely loss of transplanted organs (3-10). The close relationship between donor-specific antibodies and ABMR has been revealed by the highly sensitive detection of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (7, 11-15). Injury to transplanted organs by activation of humoral immune reaction in the context of HLA identical transplants and the absence of donor specific antibodies (17-24), strongly suggest the participation of non-HLA (nHLA) antibodies in ABMR (25). In this review, we discuss the genesis of ABMR in the context of HLA and nHLA antibodies and summarize strategies for ABMR management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiko Matsuda
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Minnie M. Sarwal
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Levitsky J, O’Leary J, Asrani S, Sharma P, Fung J, Wiseman A, Niemann C. Protecting the Kidney in Liver Transplant Recipients: Practice-Based Recommendations From the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestine Community of Practice. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:2532-44. [PMID: 26932352 PMCID: PMC5007154 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Revised: 02/12/2016] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Both acute and chronic kidney disease are common after liver transplantation and result in significant morbidity and mortality. The introduction of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score has directly correlated with an increased prevalence of perioperative renal dysfunction and the number of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations performed. Kidney dysfunction in this population is typically multifactorial and related to preexisting conditions, pretransplantation renal injury, perioperative events, and posttransplantation nephrotoxic immunosuppressive therapies. The management of kidney disease after liver transplantation is challenging, as by the time the serum creatinine level is significantly elevated, few interventions affect the course of progression. Also, immunological factors such as antibody-mediated kidney rejection have become of greater interest given the rising liver-kidney transplant population. Therefore, this review, assembled by experts in the field and endorsed by the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestine Community of Practice, provides a critical assessment of measures of renal function and interventions aimed at preserving renal function early and late after liver and simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. Key points and practice-based recommendations for the prevention and management of kidney injury in this population are provided to offer guidance for clinicians and identify gaps in knowledge for future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Levitsky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - J.G. O’Leary
- Division of Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - S. Asrani
- Division of Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - P. Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - J. Fung
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation Center, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - A. Wiseman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO
| | - C.U. Niemann
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wozniak LJ, Hickey MJ, Venick RS, Vargas JH, Farmer DG, Busuttil RW, McDiarmid SV, Reed EF. Donor-specific HLA Antibodies Are Associated With Late Allograft Dysfunction After Pediatric Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2016; 99:1416-22. [PMID: 26038872 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) after pediatric liver transplantation (LTx) is not clearly established. We completed a cross-sectional study to characterize DSA in long-term survivors of pediatric LTx and assess the impact of C1q-binding DSA on allograft outcomes. METHODS Serum samples were collected at routine clinic visits from 50 pediatric LTx recipients classified into 3 clinical phenotypes: nontolerant (n = 18) with de novo autoimmune hepatitis (DAIH) and/or late acute cellular rejection (ACR); stable (n = 25) on maintenance tacrolimus; operationally tolerant (n = 7). Samples were blinded, and antibody detection was performed using Luminex single antigen class I and II beads. Patients with positive DSA were tested for C1q-binding DSA. RESULTS DSA were detected in 54% (n = 27) of the patients, with the majority directed at HLA class II antigens (DR, 41%; DQ, 53%). Patients with DSA were younger at the time of LTx (P = 0.016) and time of study (P = 0.024). Mean aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and gamma glutamyl transferase were higher in DSA-positive patients, though did not reach statistical significance. Nontolerant patients were significantly more likely to have DQ DSA (61%) compared to stable (20%) and tolerant (29%) patients (P = 0.021). The nontolerant phenotype was associated with DSA and C1q-binding DSA, with odds ratios of 13 (P = 0.015) and 8.6 (P = 0.006), respectively. The presence of DQ DSA was associated with DAIH and late ACR, with odds ratios of 12.5 (P = 0.004) and 10.8 (P = 0.006), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Allograft dysfunction is not always evident in patients with DSA, but DQ DSA are strongly associated with DAIH, late ACR, and chronic rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Wozniak
- 1 Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA. 2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA. 3 Immunogenetics Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA. 4 Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|