1
|
Verty LV, Mellah S, Maltezos S, Boujut A, Lussier M, Bherer L, Belleville S. Youth-like brain activation linked with greater cognitive training gains in older adults: Insights from the ACTOP study. Cortex 2024; 176:221-233. [PMID: 38805784 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between inter-individual neurofunctional differences in older adults and cognitive training efficacy, with a specific focus on the association between youth-like task-related brain activation and improvements in working memory (WM) training. The data is part of the Attentional Control Training for Older People (ACTOP) study, 30 older adults completed 12 half-hour WM training sessions. The WM performance slope, assessed at the conclusion of sessions 1 through 6 and sessions 7 to 12, determined early- and late-stage training gains, respectively. Transfer measures were taken before (PRE), midway (MID), and after (POST) training, and the differences in MID-PRE and POST-MID on transfer tasks were used to determine early- and late-stage transfer effects, respectively. The Goodness of Fit (GOF) metric was used to quantify the similarity between each older adult's activation pattern, as measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), to that of a group of younger adults. GOF scores were calculated for activation during low-load (1-0back) and high-load (2-0back) N-back tasks. The results indicated that larger GOF scores in the low-load condition were associated with greater training gains in both the early and late learning stages, and that larger GOF scores in the high-load condition were associated with greater training gains during the late-stage. These findings suggest that a youth-like brain activation pattern in older adults is associated with greater cognitive training benefits, underscoring the role of inter-individual neurofunctional differences to account for variations in training outcomes among older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03532113; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03532113.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Valeyry Verty
- Research Center, Institut Universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Samira Mellah
- Research Center, Institut Universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Samantha Maltezos
- Research Center, Institut Universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Arnaud Boujut
- Research Center, Institut Universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Université de Limoges, HAVAE - UR20217, Limoges, France; 3iL Ingénieurs, Limoges, France
| | - Maxime Lussier
- Research Center, Institut Universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Louis Bherer
- Research Center, Institut Universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sylvie Belleville
- Research Center, Institut Universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meng X, Su J, Gao T, Ma D, Zhao Y, Fang S, Zhi S, Li H, Sun J. Multidomain interventions based on a life-course model to prevent dementia in at-risk Chinese older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 152:104701. [PMID: 38330865 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the time-dependent effect of specific risk factors for dementia, multidomain interventions based on a life-course model might achieve optimal preventive effects against dementia. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of multidomain interventions based on a life-course model of modifiable risk factors for dementia in at-risk Chinese older adults. DESIGN This was a two-arm, proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS We randomly assigned 96 community-dwelling at-risk adults aged 60 years or older in a 1:1 ratio to either the 6-month multidomain intervention group (dementia literacy, physical activity, cognitive training, social activity and optional modules) or the control group (health education). METHODS The primary outcomes were the dementia risk score and cognitive composite Z score. The secondary outcomes included the individual components of the dementia risk score (protective and risk factors) and cognitive composite Z score (global cognition, memory, executive function and language), social isolation (loneliness, social contact, and social participation), dementia literacy and prevention belief. Linear mixed models with maximum likelihood estimation were used to calculate the outcomes between the groups over time. RESULTS The primary analyses showed that the dementia risk score was significantly lower (p < 0.001) and that the cognitive composite Z score was significantly higher (p = 0.013) in the multidomain intervention group than in the control group. Baseline characteristics did not modify the effects of the multidomain interventions (p value for interaction > 0.05). For secondary outcomes, statistically significant group × time interactions were observed for the protective (p = 0.001) and risk factors (p = 0.049), as well as in executive function (p = 0.020), loneliness (p = 0.029), dementia literacy (p < 0.001) and prevention belief (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Multidomain interventions based on a life-course model are feasible and have the potential to reduce dementia risk and improve cognitive function in at-risk Chinese older adults. REGISTRATION The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2100053417).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangfei Meng
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China; School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jianping Su
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China; School of Nursing, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi Municipality, Xinjiang, China
| | - Tianbao Gao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Beian No.2 People's Hospital, Beian, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Dongfei Ma
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yanjie Zhao
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Shuyan Fang
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Shengze Zhi
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Hongyang Li
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Jiao Sun
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tainta M, Ecay-Torres M, de Arriba M, Barandiaran M, Otaegui-Arrazola A, Iriondo A, Garcia-Sebastian M, Estanga A, Saldias J, Clerigue M, Gabilondo A, Ros N, Mugica J, Barandiaran A, Mangialasche F, Kivipelto M, Arrospide A, Mar J, Martinez-Lage P. GOIZ ZAINDU study: a FINGER-like multidomain lifestyle intervention feasibility randomized trial to prevent dementia in Southern Europe. Alzheimers Res Ther 2024; 16:44. [PMID: 38413990 PMCID: PMC10898038 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01393-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND GOIZ ZAINDU ("caring early" in Basque) is a pilot study to adapt the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) methodology to the Basque population and evaluate the feasibility and adherence to a FINGER-like multidomain intervention program. Additional aims included the assessment of efficacy on cognition and data collection to design a large efficacy trial. METHOD GOIZ ZAINDU is a 1-year, randomized, controlled trial of a multidomain intervention in persons aged 60+ years, with Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE) risk score ≥ 6, no diagnosis of dementia, and below-than-expected performance in at least one of three cognitive screening tests. Randomization to a multidomain intervention (MD-Int) or regular health advice (RHA) was stratified by sex, age (>/≤ 75), and cognitive status (mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/normal cognition). MD-Int included cardiovascular risk factor control, nutritional counseling, physical activity, and cognitive training. The primary outcomes were retention rate and adherence to the intervention program. Exploratory cognitive outcomes included changes in the Neuropsychological Test Battery z-scores. Analyses were performed according to the intention to treat. RESULTS One hundred twenty-five participants were recruited (mean age: 75.64 (± 6.46); 58% women). The MD-Int (n = 61) and RHA (n = 64) groups were balanced in terms of their demographics and cognition. Fifty-two (85%) participants from the RHA group and 56 (88%) from the MD-Int group completed the study. More than 70% of the participants had high overall adherence to the intervention activities. The risk of cognitive decline was higher in the RHA group than in the MD-Int group in terms of executive function (p =.019) and processing speed scores (p =.026). CONCLUSIONS The GOIZ-ZAINDU study proved that the FINGER methodology is adaptable and feasible in a different socio-cultural environment. The exploratory efficacy results showed a lower risk of decline in executive function and processing speed in the intervention group. These results support the design of a large-scale efficacy trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION GOIZ ZAINDU feasibility trial was approved and registered by the Euskadi Drug Research Ethics Committee (ID: PI2017134) on 23 January 2018. Retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06163716) on 8 December 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikel Tainta
- CITA-alzheimer Foundation, Donostia-San Sebastián, País Vasco, Spain
- Osakidetza, Organización Sanitaria Integrada (OSI) Goierri-Urola Garaia, País Vasco, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | | | - Maria de Arriba
- CITA-alzheimer Foundation, Donostia-San Sebastián, País Vasco, Spain
| | - Myriam Barandiaran
- CITA-alzheimer Foundation, Donostia-San Sebastián, País Vasco, Spain
- Osakidetza, Organización Sanitaria Integrada (OSI) Donostialdea, País Vasco, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | | | - Ane Iriondo
- CITA-alzheimer Foundation, Donostia-San Sebastián, País Vasco, Spain
| | | | - Ainara Estanga
- CITA-alzheimer Foundation, Donostia-San Sebastián, País Vasco, Spain
| | - Jon Saldias
- CITA-alzheimer Foundation, Donostia-San Sebastián, País Vasco, Spain
| | | | - Alazne Gabilondo
- Osakidetza, Organización Sanitaria Integrada (OSI) Donostialdea, País Vasco, Spain
- Osakidetza, Organización Sanitaria Integrada (OSI) Bidasoa, País Vasco, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Naia Ros
- University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Justo Mugica
- Osakidetza, Organización Sanitaria Integrada (OSI) Goierri-Urola Garaia, País Vasco, Spain
| | - Aitziber Barandiaran
- Osakidetza, Organización Sanitaria Integrada (OSI) Goierri-Urola Garaia, País Vasco, Spain
| | - Francesca Mangialasche
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Medical Unit Aging, Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Miia Kivipelto
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Medical Unit Aging, Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- The Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Arantzazu Arrospide
- Osakidetza, Organización Sanitaria Integrada (OSI) Debagoiena, País Vasco, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Javier Mar
- Osakidetza, Organización Sanitaria Integrada (OSI) Debagoiena, País Vasco, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios Kronikgune, Barakaldo, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Jager Loots CA, Price G, Barbera M, Neely AS, Gavelin HM, Lehtisalo J, Ngandu T, Solomon A, Mangialasche F, Kivipelto M. Development of a Cognitive Training Support Programme for prevention of dementia and cognitive decline in at-risk older adults. FRONTIERS IN DEMENTIA 2024; 3:1331741. [PMID: 39081598 PMCID: PMC11285552 DOI: 10.3389/frdem.2024.1331741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Background Evidence for the beneficial effects of cognitive training on cognitive function and daily living activities is inconclusive. Variable study quality and design does not allow for robust comparisons/meta-analyses of different cognitive training programmes. Fairly low adherence to extended cognitive training interventions in clinical trials has been reported. Aims The aim of further developing a Cognitive Training Support Programme (CTSP) is to supplement the Computerised Cognitive Training (CCT) intervention component of the multimodal Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER), which is adapted to different cultural, regional and economic settings within the Word-Wide FINGERS (WW-FINGERS) Network. The main objectives are to improve adherence to cognitive training through a behaviour change framework and provide information about cognitive stimulation, social engagement and lifestyle risk factors for dementia. Methods Six CTSP sessions were re-designed covering topics including (1) CCT instructions and tasks, (2) Cognitive domains: episodic memory, executive function and processing speed, (3) Successful ageing and compensatory strategies, (4) Cognitive stimulation and engagement, (5) Wellbeing factors affecting cognition (e.g., sleep and mood), (6) Sensory factors. Session content will be related to everyday life, with participant reflection and behaviour change techniques incorporated, e.g., strategies, goal-setting, active planning to enhance motivation, and adherence to the CCT and in relevant lifestyle changes. Conclusions Through interactive presentations promoting brain health, the programme provides for personal reflection that may enhance capability, opportunity and motivation for behaviour change. This will support adherence to the CCT within multidomain intervention trials. Efficacy of the programme will be evaluated through participant feedback and adherence metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste A. de Jager Loots
- Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geraint Price
- Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mariagnese Barbera
- Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anna Stigsdotter Neely
- Department of Social and Psychological Studies, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
- Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
| | | | - Jenni Lehtisalo
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Population Health Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tiia Ngandu
- Population Health Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alina Solomon
- Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Francesca Mangialasche
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- FINGERS Brain Health Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Inflammation and Aging, Medical Unit Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Miia Kivipelto
- Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- FINGERS Brain Health Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Inflammation and Aging, Medical Unit Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chang YY, Ting B, Chen DTL, Hsu WT, Lin SC, Kuo CY, Wang MF. Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Depression in the Elderly and Patients with Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:536. [PMID: 38470647 PMCID: PMC10931076 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12050536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation interventions in improving depression in patients with dementia. To achieve this objective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from primary electronic databases, focusing on the relationship between omega-3 fatty acids and depression in patients with dementia. The primary outcome was the impact of omega-3 fatty acids on post-intervention depression in patients with dementia, with subgroup analyses conducted based on the type of intervention (docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) combination), duration of intervention (3 months, 6 months, 12 months, ≥24 months), cognitive function (ranging from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to severe dementia), and daily dosage (high, medium, low, applicable to both DHA and EPA). The study has been duly registered with PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42023408744). A meta-analysis of five studies (n = 517) included in nine systematic reviews showed that omega-3 supplementation had a non-significant trend toward affecting depressive symptoms in patients with dementia (standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.147; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.324 to 0.049; p = 0.141). Subgroup analyses revealed that DHA supplementation significantly reduced depressive symptoms (SMD: -0.247; p = 0.039). There was no significant effect for high (SMD: -0.169; 95% CI: -0.454 to 0.116; p = 0.246) or medium (SMD: -0.061; 95% CI: -0.228 to 0.105; p = 0.470) doses of EPA. However, low doses of EPA were significantly effective (SMD: -0.953; 95% CI: -1.534 to -0.373; p = 0.001), with notable improvements in patients with MCI (SMD: -0.934; p < 0.001). The study concludes that omega-3 fatty acids, particularly through DHA supplementation, may alleviate depressive symptoms in patients with MCI. Given the limited sample size, further long-term RCTs are recommended to better understand the efficacy and optimal management of omega-3 supplementation in this population using different dosages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Yun Chang
- Department of Food and Nutrition, Providence University, Taichung 433719, Taiwan;
| | - Berne Ting
- Ph.D. Program for Aging, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404333, Taiwan;
| | - Daniel Tzu-Li Chen
- Department of Psychiatry and Mind-Body Interface Laboratory (MBI-Lab), China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan;
- Graduate Institute of Biomedicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404327, Taiwan;
- College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ti Hsu
- Graduate Institute of Biomedicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404327, Taiwan;
- College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
- Department of Anesthesiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
| | - Song-Chow Lin
- Department of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan;
| | - Chun-Yen Kuo
- Ph.D. Program in Health and Social Welfare for Indigenous Peoples, Providence University, Taichung 433719, Taiwan;
| | - Ming-Fu Wang
- Department of Food and Nutrition, Providence University, Taichung 433719, Taiwan;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Daly T. The iceberg of dementia risk: empirical and conceptual arguments in favor of structural interventions for brain health. CEREBRAL CIRCULATION - COGNITION AND BEHAVIOR 2023; 6:100193. [PMID: 39071741 PMCID: PMC11273093 DOI: 10.1016/j.cccb.2023.100193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
While pharmacological interventions for dementia struggle to demonstrate improved outcomes for patients and at-risk populations, non-pharmacological lifestyle interventions have been proposed as a tool to achieve dementia risk reduction. In this review, it is argued that lifestyle modification alone is a surface-level intervention from the point of view of fair and far-reaching dementia prevention. Below the tip of this "iceberg of dementia risk," there are living conditions and social structures that represent deeper contributions to risk in the population. It is argued that alongside lifestyle modification, activist research and structural interventions are needed to make our society fairer and more dementia-resilient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Daly
- Correspondence at: Bioethics Program, FLACSO Argentina, Tucumán 1966, C1050 AAN, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Corriveau-Lecavalier N, Barnard LR, Lee J, Dicks E, Botha H, Graff-Radford J, Machulda MM, Boeve BF, Knopman DS, Lowe VJ, Petersen RC, Jack, Jr CR, Jones DT. Deciphering the clinico-radiological heterogeneity of dysexecutive Alzheimer's disease. Cereb Cortex 2023; 33:7026-7043. [PMID: 36721911 PMCID: PMC10233237 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Dysexecutive Alzheimer's disease (dAD) manifests as a progressive dysexecutive syndrome without prominent behavioral features, and previous studies suggest clinico-radiological heterogeneity within this syndrome. We uncovered this heterogeneity using unsupervised machine learning in 52 dAD patients with multimodal imaging and cognitive data. A spectral decomposition of covariance between FDG-PET images yielded six latent factors ("eigenbrains") accounting for 48% of variance in patterns of hypometabolism. These eigenbrains differentially related to age at onset, clinical severity, and cognitive performance. A hierarchical clustering on the eigenvalues of these eigenbrains yielded four dAD subtypes, i.e. "left-dominant," "right-dominant," "bi-parietal-dominant," and "heteromodal-diffuse." Patterns of FDG-PET hypometabolism overlapped with those of tau-PET distribution and MRI neurodegeneration for each subtype, whereas patterns of amyloid deposition were similar across subtypes. Subtypes differed in age at onset and clinical severity where the heteromodal-diffuse exhibited a worse clinical picture, and the bi-parietal had a milder clinical presentation. We propose a conceptual framework of executive components based on the clinico-radiological associations observed in dAD. We demonstrate that patients with dAD, despite sharing core clinical features, are diagnosed with variability in their clinical and neuroimaging profiles. Our findings support the use of data-driven approaches to delineate brain-behavior relationships relevant to clinical practice and disease physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jeyeon Lee
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Ellen Dicks
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Hugo Botha
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Mary M Machulda
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Bradley F Boeve
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - David S Knopman
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Val J Lowe
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | | - David T Jones
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Frisoni GB, Altomare D, Ribaldi F, Villain N, Brayne C, Mukadam N, Abramowicz M, Barkhof F, Berthier M, Bieler-Aeschlimann M, Blennow K, Brioschi Guevara A, Carrera E, Chételat G, Csajka C, Demonet JF, Dodich A, Garibotto V, Georges J, Hurst S, Jessen F, Kivipelto M, Llewellyn DJ, McWhirter L, Milne R, Minguillón C, Miniussi C, Molinuevo JL, Nilsson PM, Noyce A, Ranson JM, Grau-Rivera O, Schott JM, Solomon A, Stephen R, van der Flier W, van Duijn C, Vellas B, Visser LN, Cummings JL, Scheltens P, Ritchie C, Dubois B. Dementia prevention in memory clinics: recommendations from the European task force for brain health services. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2023; 26:100576. [PMID: 36895446 PMCID: PMC9989648 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Observational population studies indicate that prevention of dementia and cognitive decline is being accomplished, possibly as an unintended result of better vascular prevention and healthier lifestyles. Population aging in the coming decades requires deliberate efforts to further decrease its prevalence and societal burden. Increasing evidence supports the efficacy of preventive interventions on persons with intact cognition and high dementia risk. We report recommendations for the deployment of second-generation memory clinics (Brain Health Services) whose mission is evidence-based and ethical dementia prevention in at-risk individuals. The cornerstone interventions consist of (i) assessment of genetic and potentially modifiable risk factors including brain pathology, and risk stratification, (ii) risk communication with ad-hoc protocols, (iii) risk reduction with multi-domain interventions, and (iv) cognitive enhancement with cognitive and physical training. A roadmap is proposed for concept validation and ensuing clinical deployment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni B. Frisoni
- Memory Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals and University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniele Altomare
- Memory Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals and University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Federica Ribaldi
- Memory Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals and University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Villain
- Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d’Alzheimer, IM2A, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, UMR-S975, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Carol Brayne
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Naaheed Mukadam
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marc Abramowicz
- Genetic Medicine, Diagnostics Dept, University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marcelo Berthier
- Unit of Cognitive Neurology and Aphasia, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias (CIMES), University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - Melanie Bieler-Aeschlimann
- Leenaards Memory Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Infections Disease Service, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Andrea Brioschi Guevara
- Leenaards Memory Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Emmanuel Carrera
- Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Gaël Chételat
- Normandie University, UNICAEN, INSERM, U1237, PhIND Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders, Cyceron, Caen, France
| | - Chantal Csajka
- Center of Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Demonet
- Leenaards Memory Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network, INSERM, University Hospital of Toulouse, France
| | - Alessandra Dodich
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals of Geneva and NIMTLab, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Samia Hurst
- Institute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frank Jessen
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn-Cologne, Germany
- Excellence Cluster Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Related Diseases (CECAD), Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Miia Kivipelto
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- The Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David J. Llewellyn
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, UK
- Alan Turing Institute, Exeter, UK
| | - Laura McWhirter
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Richard Milne
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Engagement and Society, Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, UK
| | - Carolina Minguillón
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlo Miniussi
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
- Centre for Medical Sciences (CISMed), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- H. Lundbeck A/S, Denmark
| | - Peter M. Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Sweden
- Department of Internal Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Alastair Noyce
- Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Oriol Grau-Rivera
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jonathan M. Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Alina Solomon
- The Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, NVS, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ruth Stephen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Wiesje van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelia van Duijn
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Bruno Vellas
- Gerontopole and Alzheimer's Disease Research and Clinical Center, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Leonie N.C. Visser
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey L. Cummings
- Chambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience, Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- EQT Life Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Craig Ritchie
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d’Alzheimer, IM2A, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, UMR-S975, INSERM, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Castro CB, Costa LM, Dias CB, Chen J, Hillebrandt H, Gardener SL, Brown BM, Loo RL, Garg ML, Rainey-Smith SR, Martins RN, Sohrabi HR. Multi-Domain Interventions for Dementia Prevention - A Systematic Review. J Nutr Health Aging 2023; 27:1271-1280. [PMID: 38151879 DOI: 10.1007/s12603-023-2046-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is a growing incidence of cognitive decline and dementia associated with the ageing population. Lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, and cognitive activities may individually or collectively be undertaken to increase one's odds of preventing cognitive decline and future dementia. This study will examine whether clinical trials using multidomain lifestyle intervention can significantly decrease the risk of cognitive decline and therefore dementia. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS This systematic literature review of multidomain lifestyle interventions for the prevention of cognitive decline and dementia followed the PRISMA guidelines. Clinical trials involving multidomain intervention (i.e., diet and physical activity, or without cognitive training) in older adults (≥ 49 years old) at higher risk of dementia were identified through 5 electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus). A comprehensive search was performed to identify and retrieve publications until 15 November 2022. Trials were published in English. RESULTS The included studies (n=15) assessed change in cognition in response to a multidomain lifestyle intervention. However, the cognitive outcome measures used in these studies were heterogeneous. Despite this heterogeneity, two thirds of the studies showed improvement in cognition following a multidomain intervention (n=10 with a total of 9,439 participants). However, five studies reported no improvement in cognition following the multidomain intervention. The most common form of dietary intervention included higher amount of fruit and vegetable intake; whole-grain cereal products instead of refined; low fat options in milk and meat products; and limiting sucrose intake to less than 50 g/day. Most clinical trial studies were powered to examining the effects of multidomain interventions in cognition but were not designed to test the contribution of individual domains (i.e., dietary changes, increased physical activity, or increased cognitive stimulation alone). CONCLUSION This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of multimodal lifestyle interventions on cognitive outcomes in older adults at risk of dementia. We found that participants with conditions that may increase the risk of dementia, (e.g., hypertension, cardiovascular fragility) do benefit from multi-modal lifestyle changes including diet, physical activity, and cognitive training. Two thirds of studies using multidomain lifestyle interventions showed improvements in cognitive function. Trials with a focus on cognitive training, dietary improvement, and physical activity may prevent or delay cognitive decline in older adults including those at risk of developing dementia. Future studies should consider longer follow-up periods and adequate power to be able to examine the effects of each lifestyle component in the context of multimodal interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C B Castro
- Professor Hamid R. Sohrabi, Centre for Healthy Ageing, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, Phone: +61 8 9360 6901, E-mail: ; Professor Ralph N. Martins, Centre of Excellence for Alzheimer's Disease Research and Care, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia, E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Montero-Odasso M, Zou GY, Kamkar N, Feldman HH, Belleville S, Chertkow H, Nygaard HB, Son S, Speechley M. Multidomain trials to prevent dementia: addressing methodological challenges. Alzheimers Res Ther 2022; 14:94. [PMID: 35820915 PMCID: PMC9275261 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-022-01036-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Multidomain trials to prevent dementia by simultaneously targeting multiple risk factors with non-pharmacological lifestyle interventions show promise. Designing trials to evaluate the efficacy of individual interventions and their combinations is methodologically challenging. Determining the efficacy is, nevertheless, important to individuals, payers, and for resource allocations to support intervention implementation. Main body The central rationale for seminal trials improving cardiovascular health or reducing falls risk in older adults is that multifactorial conditions may be amenable to improvement by simultaneously targeting multiple modifiable risk factors. Similar reasoning underlies lifestyle interventions to reduce dementia risk using combinations of physical exercise, cognitive training, diet, amelioration of vascular-metabolic risk factors, and improving sleep quality. Randomizing individuals with at least two modifiable risk factors to “standardly tailored” interventions to mitigate their risk factors, versus a comparator arm, will yield an unbiased estimate of the cumulative average effect of modifying more versus fewer risk factors. The between-group difference in the cognitive primary outcome will reflect both the main effects of the mitigated risk factors, as well as their synergistic effects. However, given the positive trial results, there are inherent challenges in quantifying post hoc which components, or combination of components, were responsible for improvements in cognition. Here, we elaborate on these methodological challenges and important considerations in using a standardly tailored design with two arms (one consisting of multidomain interventions tailored to participants’ risk profiles and another consisting of active control conditions). We compare this approach to fully factorial designs and highlight the disadvantages and advantages of each. We discuss partial solutions, including analytical strategies such as risk reduction scores that measure reductions in the number or severity of risk factors in each study arm. Positive results can support the causal inference that between-group differences in the primary cognitive outcome were due to risk factor modification. Conclusion Standardly tailored designs are pragmatic and feasible evaluations of multidomain interventions to reduce dementia risk. We propose sensitivity and exploratory analyses of between-group reductions in the severity of risk factors, as a methodology to bolster causal inferences that between-group differences in the primary cognitive outcome are due to the risk factors modified. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13195-022-01036-1.
Collapse
|
11
|
Coley N, Giulioli C, Aisen PS, Vellas B, Andrieu S. Randomised controlled trials for the prevention of cognitive decline or dementia: A systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 2022; 82:101777. [PMID: 36336171 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Dementia prevention research has progressed rapidly in recent years, with publication of several large lifestyle intervention trials, and renewed interest in pharmacological interventions, notably for individuals with Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, warranting an updated review of results and methodology. We identified 112 completed trials testing the efficacy of single-domain pharmacological (n = 33, 29%), nutritional (n = 27, 24%), physical activity (n = 18, 16%) and cognitive stimulation (n = 13, 12%), or multidomain (n = 22, 20%) interventions on incident dementia, or a relevant intermediate marker (e.g. cognitive function, biomarkers or dementia risk scores) in people without dementia. The earliest trials tested pharmacological interventions or nutritional supplements, but lifestyle interventions predominated in the last decade. In total, 21 (19%) trials demonstrated a clear beneficial effect on the pre-specified primary outcome (or all co-primary outcomes), but only two (10%) were large-scale (testing blood pressure lowering (Syst-Eur) or multidomain (FINGER) interventions on incident dementia and cognitive change in cognitive function, respectively). Of the 116 ongoing trials, 40% (n = 46) are testing multidomain interventions. Recent methodological shifts concern target populations, primary outcome measures, and intervention design, but study design remains constant (parallel group randomised controlled trial). Future trials may consider using adaptive trials or interventions, and more targeted approaches, since certain interventions may be more effective in certain subgroups of the population, and at specific times in the life-course. Efforts should also be made to increase the representativeness and diversity of prevention trial populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Coley
- Center for Epidemiology and Research in Population Health (CERPOP), University of Toulouse, INSERM UMR1295, UPS, Toulouse, France; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
| | - Caroline Giulioli
- Center for Epidemiology and Research in Population Health (CERPOP), University of Toulouse, INSERM UMR1295, UPS, Toulouse, France; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Paul S Aisen
- Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Bruno Vellas
- Center for Epidemiology and Research in Population Health (CERPOP), University of Toulouse, INSERM UMR1295, UPS, Toulouse, France; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France; Gerontopole of Toulouse, Institute of Ageing, Toulouse University Hospital, France
| | - Sandrine Andrieu
- Center for Epidemiology and Research in Population Health (CERPOP), University of Toulouse, INSERM UMR1295, UPS, Toulouse, France; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal and Geriatric Medicine, University of New Mexico, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Essery R, Pollet S, Bradbury K, Western MJ, Grey E, Denison-Day J, Smith KA, Hayter V, Kelly J, Somerville J, Stuart B, Becque T, Zhang J, Slodkowska-Barabasz J, Mowbray F, Ferrey A, Yao G, Zhu S, Kendrick T, Griffin S, Mutrie N, Robinson S, Brooker H, Griffiths G, Robinson L, Rossor M, Ballard C, Gallacher J, Rathod S, Gudgin B, Phillips R, Stokes T, Niven J, Little P, Yardley L. Parallel randomized controlled feasibility trials of the "Active Brains" digital intervention to protect cognitive health in adults aged 60-85. Front Public Health 2022; 10:962873. [PMID: 36203694 PMCID: PMC9530972 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.962873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Multidomain interventions to address modifiable risk factors for dementia are promising, but require more cost-effective, scalable delivery. This study investigated the feasibility of the "Active Brains" digital behavior change intervention and its trial procedures. Materials and methods Active Brains aims to reduce cognitive decline by promoting physical activity, healthy eating, and online cognitive training. We conducted 12-month parallel-design randomized controlled feasibility trials of "Active Brains" amongst "lower cognitive scoring" (n = 180) and "higher cognitive scoring" (n = 180) adults aged 60-85. Results We collected 67.2 and 76.1% of our 12-month primary outcome (Baddeley verbal reasoning task) data for the "lower cognitive score" and "higher cognitive score" groups, respectively. Usage of "Active Brains" indicated overall feasibility and satisfactory engagement with the physical activity intervention content (which did not require sustained online engagement), but engagement with online cognitive training was limited. Uptake of the additional brief telephone support appeared to be higher in the "lower cognitive score" trial. Preliminary descriptive trends in the primary outcome data might indicate a protective effect of Active Brains against cognitive decline, but further investigation in fully-powered trials is required to answer this definitively. Discussion Whilst initial uptake and engagement with the online intervention was modest, it was in line with typical usage of other digital behavior change interventions, and early indications from the descriptive analysis of the primary outcome and behavioral data suggest that further exploration of the potential protective benefits of Active Brains are warranted. The study also identified minor modifications to procedures, particularly to improve online primary-outcome completion. Further investigation of Active Brains will now seek to determine its efficacy in protecting cognitive performance amongst adults aged 60-85 with varied levels of existing cognitive performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie Essery
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom,*Correspondence: Rosie Essery
| | | | - Katherine Bradbury
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom,NIHR ARC Wessex, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Joanne Kelly
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Beth Stuart
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom,Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Taeko Becque
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Jin Zhang
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Anne Ferrey
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Guiqing Yao
- University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Shihua Zhu
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Tony Kendrick
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Gareth Griffiths
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - John Gallacher
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Shanaya Rathod
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Bernard Gudgin
- Patient and Public Involvement Contributor, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Rosemary Phillips
- Patient and Public Involvement Contributor, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Stokes
- Patient and Public Involvement Contributor, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - John Niven
- Patient and Public Involvement Contributor, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Little
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Yardley
- University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom,University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Daly T. Upping the dose of dementia risk reduction. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 18:1699. [PMID: 35527368 PMCID: PMC9514310 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Daly
- Sorbonne UniversitéScience, Norms, Democracy, Philosophy DepartmentParisFrance
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Multidomain interventions for risk reduction and prevention of cognitive decline and dementia: current developments. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2022; 35:285-292. [PMID: 35703256 DOI: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The potential for dementia prevention is deemed substantial if modifiable risk factors were addressed. First large-scale multidomain lifestyle interventions aiming at reducing risk of cognitive decline and dementia have yielded mixed but promising evidence. RECENT FINDINGS Despite the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trials conduction, causing interruptions and delays, the research landscape on multidomain interventions is growing rapidly. The successful Finish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) has led to an adaptation of the FINGER model in trials underway or being planned in over 40 countries. Recent studies identified barriers and facilitators of and adherence to multidomain interventions, showed the suitability of dementia risk scores as surrogate outcomes, and suggested mechanisms. Multidomain interventions are increasingly conducted in the Global South, and study protocols are increasingly testing expanded FINGER models, for example, with pharmacological components, in digital/remote settings and co-designed personalized interventions. SUMMARY Though results remain mixed, the many ongoing trials will provide more conclusive evidence within the next few years and help to optimize interventions. Continued international collaboration is pivotal to scale and accelerate the development and implementation of effective multidomain interventions as part of larger public health strategies to counteract the global dementia increase.
Collapse
|
15
|
Faßbender RV, Risius OJ, Dronse J, Richter N, Gramespacher H, Befahr Q, Fink GR, Kukolja J, Onur OA. Decreased Efficiency of Between-Network Dynamics During Early Memory Consolidation With Aging. Front Aging Neurosci 2022; 14:780630. [PMID: 35651531 PMCID: PMC9148994 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.780630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Aging is associated with memory decline and progressive disabilities in the activities of daily living. These deficits have a significant impact on the quality of life of the aging population and lead to a tremendous burden on societies and health care systems. Understanding the mechanisms underlying aging-related memory decline is likely to inform the development of compensatory strategies promoting independence in old age. Research on aging-related memory decline has mainly focused on encoding and retrieval. However, some findings suggest that memory deficits may at least partly be due to impaired consolidation. To date, it remains elusive whether aging-related memory decline results from defective consolidation. This study examined age effects on consolidation-related neural mechanisms and their susceptibility to interference using functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 13 younger (20–30 years, 8 female) and 16 older (49–75 years, 5 female) healthy participants. fMRI was performed before and during a memory paradigm comprised of encoding, consolidation, and retrieval phases. Consolidation was variously challenged: (1) control (no manipulation), (2) interference (repeated stimulus presentation with interfering information), and (3) reminder condition (repeated presentation without interfering information). We analyzed the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) to compare brain activity changes from pre- to post-encoding rest. In the control condition, fALFF was decreased in the left supramarginal gyrus, right middle temporal gyrus, and left precuneus but increased in parts of the occipital and inferior temporal cortex. Connectivity analyses between fALFF-derived seeds and network ROIs revealed an aging-related decrease in the efficiency of functional connectivity (FC) within the ventral stream network and between salience, default mode, and central executive networks during consolidation. Moreover, our results indicate increased interference susceptibility in older individuals with dynamics between salience and default mode networks as a neurophysiological correlate. Conclusively, aging-related memory decline is partly caused by inefficient consolidation. Memory consolidation requires a complex interplay between large-scale brain networks, which qualitatively decreases with age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronja V. Faßbender
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Okka J. Risius
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julian Dronse
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nils Richter
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hannes Gramespacher
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Qumars Befahr
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gereon R. Fink
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Juraj Kukolja
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
- Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Oezguer A. Onur
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- *Correspondence: Oezguer A. Onur,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ashford JW, Schmitt FA, Bergeron MF, Bayley PJ, Clifford JO, Xu Q, Liu X, Zhou X, Kumar V, Buschke H, Dean M, Finkel SI, Hyer L, Perry G. Now is the Time to Improve Cognitive Screening and Assessment for Clinical and Research Advancement. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 87:305-315. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-220211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the only cause of death ranked in the top ten globally without precise early diagnosis or effective means of prevention or treatment. Further, AD was identified as a pandemic [1] well before COVID-19 was dubbed a 21st century pandemic [2]. And now, with the realization of the prominent secondary impacts of pandemics, there is a growing, widespread recognition of the tremendous magnitude of the impending burden from AD in an aging world population in the coming decades [3]. This appreciation has amplified the growing and pressing need for a new, efficacious, and practical platform to detect and track cognitive decline, beginning in the preliminary (prodromal) phases of the disease, sensitively, accurately, effectively, reliably, efficiently, and remotely [4–7]. Moreover, the parallel necessity of clarifying and understanding risk factors, developing successful prevention strategies [8–17], and discovering and monitoring viable and effective treatments could all benefit from accurate and efficient screening and assessment platforms. Modern recognition of AD [18] as a common affliction of the elderly began in 1968 with a paper by Blessed, Tomlinson, & Roth [19] in which two tests, one a brief assessment of cognitive function and the other a measure of daily function, demonstrated impairment which was associated with the postmortem counts of neurofibrillary tangles, composed mainly of microtubule-associated protein-tau (tau), in the brain, though not to senile plaques, composed mainly of amyloid-β (Aβ). Even in more recent analyses, the tangles correspond with the severity of dementia more than the plaques [20, 21]. Since 1960, a plethora of cognitive tests, paper and pencil [22, 23], simple screening models [24], and computerized [25–27], have been developed to assess the dysfunction associated with AD. However, there has been limited application of Modern Test Theory, which includes Item Characteristic Curve Analysis, used in the technological development of such tools [28–31], along with widespread failure to understand the underlying AD pathological process to guide test development [32, 33]. The lack of such development has likely been a major contributor to the failure of the field to develop timely screening approaches for AD [34, 35], inaccurate assessment of the progression of AD [36], and even now, failure to find an effective approach to stopping AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Wesson Ashford
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, VA Palo Alto HCS, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
| | - Frederick A. Schmitt
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, Psychology, Behavioral Science; Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, Spinal Cord & Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky, Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Peter J. Bayley
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, VA Palo Alto HCS, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
| | | | - Qun Xu
- Health Management Center, Department of Neurology, Renji Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaolei Liu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
- Yunnan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Yunnan, China
| | - Xianbo Zhou
- Center for Alzheimer’s Research, Washington Institute of Clinical Research, Vienna, VA, USA
- Zhongze Therapeutics, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Herman Buschke
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology and Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Lena and Joseph Gluck Distinguished Scholar in Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Margaret Dean
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- Geriatric Division, Internal Medicine, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, USA
| | - Sanford I. Finkel
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- University of Chicago Medical School, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lee Hyer
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- Gateway Behavioral Health, Mercer University, School of Medicine, Savannah, GA, USA
| | - George Perry
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- Brain Health Consortium, Department Biology and Chemistry, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|