1
|
Kennedy AS, Brown DB, Fakih M, Jeyarajah R, Jones S, Liu D, Pinato DJ, Sangro B, Sharma NK, Sze DY, Van Cutsem E, Wasan HS. Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus on Safety of Combining Transarterial Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 Microspheres with Systemic Anticancer Agents for the Treatment of Liver Malignancy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:1253-1267.e1. [PMID: 38885899 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide guidance, via multidisciplinary consensus statements, on the safety interactions between systemic anticancer agents (such as radiosensitizing chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (90Y)-labeled microspheres in the treatment of primary and metastatic liver malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search identified 59 references that informed 26 statements on the safety of 90Y TARE combined with systemic therapies. Modified Delphi method was used to develop consensus on statements through online anonymous surveys of the 12 panel members representing the fields of interventional radiology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, hepatology, and pharmacy, focusing on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), neuroendocrine tumors, metastatic breast cancer, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. RESULTS High-level evidence was limited. Level 1 data in patients with mCRC suggest that some radiosensitizing chemotherapies (eg, oxaliplatin) require temporary dose reduction when used concomitantly with 90Y TARE, and some targeted therapies (eg, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors) should be avoided for at least 4 weeks before 90Y TARE. In patients with HCC, the feasibility of 90Y TARE and immunotherapy has been demonstrated with Level 4 evidence. Data are more limited for other primary and secondary liver malignancies, and consensus statements were driven by expert opinion (Level 5). CONCLUSIONS Given the absence of evidence-based guidelines on the safety of 90Y TARE in combination with systemic anticancer therapy, these consensus statements provide expert guidance on the potential risks when considering specific combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Kennedy
- Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.
| | - Daniel B Brown
- Interventional Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Marwan Fakih
- Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte, Duarte, California
| | | | - Suzanne Jones
- Drug Development, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David Liu
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain
| | - Navesh K Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, New York, Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel Y Sze
- Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Eric Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Harpreet S Wasan
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gebauer B, Collettini F, Pfob CH, Lapa C. [Modern TARE 2023 - from palliative care to a curative treatment alternative]. Nuklearmedizin 2024. [PMID: 39013456 DOI: 10.1055/a-2353-5819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) or transarterial radioembolisation (TARE) is an alternative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or hepatic metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) and is now anchored in many guidelines. The article summarises the current guidelines on SIRT/TARE in HCC and mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Federico Collettini
- Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Constantin Lapa
- Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee RC, Liang PC, Liang HL, Chen YF, Yu CY, Cheng PN, Hung CF, Hsia CY, Lai HC, Ho MC, Cheng YF, Liu YS, Chao Y, Chen CH. Multicenter evaluation of the safety and efficacy of selective internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres in Taiwan: data from the RESIN registry. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:1318-1327. [PMID: 38615197 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The REgistry of Selective Internal radiation therapy in AsiaNs (RESIN) was a multicenter, single-arm, prospective, observational study of 90Y resin microspheres in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from Taiwan. RESIN is the first real-life clinical study of this therapy in an Asian cohort. Study objectives were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 90Y resin microspheres. METHODS Adults with HCC or mCRC scheduled to receive SIRT with 90Y resin microspheres were included. Primary endpoints were best overall response rate (ORR), adverse events, and changes from baseline in liver function. Secondary efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 107 enrolled patients, 83 had HCC, and 24 had mCRC. ORR was 55.41% (HCC) and 33.33% (mCRC). Of 58 HCC patients with 6-month post-SIRT data, 13.79% (n = 8) had resection, transplantation, transarterial chemoembolization, or radiofrequency ablation as the result of down-staging or down-sizing of their lesions. One hundred and ten treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 51 patients, and five serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in five patients. The most frequent TEAEs were abdominal pain, nausea and decreased appetite (HCC), and abdominal pain, decreased appetite, fatigue, and vomiting (mCRC). Two deaths due to SAEs (probably related to SIRT) were reported, both in patients with extensive HCC, active hepatitis infection, and other comorbidities. Median OS was 24.07 (HCC) and 12.66 (mCRC) months. CONCLUSIONS Safety and efficacy outcomes with the routine use of SIRT with 90Y resin microspheres in Taiwan are consistent with published data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rheun-Chuan Lee
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Chin Liang
- Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Huei-Lung Liang
- Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Fang Chen
- Department of Radiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Yen Yu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Pin-Nan Cheng
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Fu Hung
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, New Taipei City Tucheng Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Yuan Hsia
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsueh-Chou Lai
- Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chih Ho
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Fan Cheng
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Sheng Liu
- Department of Medical Imaging, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yee Chao
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Hung Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
González-Flores E, Zambudio N, Pardo-Moreno P, Gonzalez-Astorga B, de la Rúa JR, Triviño-Ibáñez EM, Navarro P, Espinoza-Cámac N, Casado MÁ, Rodríguez-Fernández A. Recommendations for the management of yttrium-90 radioembolization in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: a multidisciplinary review. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:851-863. [PMID: 37747636 PMCID: PMC10981623 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03299-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Strategies for the treatment of liver metastases from colon cancer (lmCRC) are constantly evolving. Radioembolization with yttrium 90 (Y-90 TARE) has made significant advancements in treating liver tumors and is now considered a potential option allowing for future resection. This study reviewed the scientific evidence and developed recommendations for using Y-90 TARE as a treatment strategy for patients with unresectable lmCRC. METHODS A multidisciplinary scientific committee, consisting of experts in medical oncology, hepatobiliary surgery, radiology, and nuclear medicine, all with extensive experience in treating patients with ImCRC with Y-90 TARE, led this project. The committee established the criteria for conducting a comprehensive literature review on Y-90 TARE in the treatment of lmCRC. The data extraction process involved addressing initial preliminary inquiries, which were consolidated into a final set of questions. RESULTS This review offers recommendations for treating patients with lmCRC using Y-90 TARE, addressing four areas covering ten common questions: 1) General issues (multidisciplinary tumor committee, indications for treatment, contraindications); 2) Previous process (predictive biomarkers for patient selection, preintervention tests, published evidence); 3) Procedure (standard procedure); and 4) Post-intervention follow-up (potential toxicity and its management, parameters for evaluation, quality of life). CONCLUSIONS Based on the insights of the multidisciplinary committee, this document offers a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects involved in the management of Y-90 TARE. It synthesizes recommendations for applying Y-90 TARE across various phases of the treatment process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Encarna González-Flores
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria IBS, Granada, Spain
| | - Natalia Zambudio
- Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Pedro Pardo-Moreno
- Radiodiagnostic Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | - Eva M Triviño-Ibáñez
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Pablo Navarro
- Radiodiagnostic Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Nataly Espinoza-Cámac
- Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4-I, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28224, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Miguel Ángel Casado
- Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4-I, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28224, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Rodríguez-Fernández
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria IBS, Granada, Spain
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boshell D, Bester L. Radioembolisation of liver metastases. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:842-852. [PMID: 37343147 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
This review aims to present contemporary data for SIRT in the treatment of secondary hepatic malignancies including colorectal, neuroendocrine, breast and uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Boshell
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lourens Bester
- Department of Radiology, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hallemeier CL, Sharma N, Anker C, Selfridge JE, Lee P, Jabbour S, Williams V, Liu D, Kennedy T, Jethwa KR, Kim E, Kumar R, Small W, Tchelebi L, Russo S. American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of liver-directed therapies for nonsurgical management of liver metastases: Systematic review and guidelines. Cancer 2023; 129:3193-3212. [PMID: 37409678 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
The liver is a common site of cancer metastases. Systemic therapy is widely accepted as the standard treatment for liver metastases (LM), although select patients with liver oligometastases may be candidates for potentially curative liver resection. Recent data support the role of nonsurgical local therapies such as ablation, external beam radiotherapy, embolization, and hepatic artery infusion therapy for management of LM. Additionally, for patients with advanced, symptomatic LM, local therapies may provide palliative benefit. The American Radium Society gastrointestinal expert panel, including members representing radiation oncology, interventional radiology, surgical oncology, and medical oncology, performed a systemic review and developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of nonsurgical local therapies for LM. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology was used. These studies were used to inform the expert panel, which then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in seven representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). A summary of recommendations is outlined to guide practitioners on the use of nonsurgical local therapies for patients with LM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, York, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - J Eva Selfridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Salma Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Vonetta Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Liu
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Birth Columbia, Canada
| | - Timothy Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ed Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Leila Tchelebi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Suzanne Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vulasala SSR, Sutphin PD, Kethu S, Onteddu NK, Kalva SP. Interventional radiological therapies in colorectal hepatic metastases. Front Oncol 2023; 13:963966. [PMID: 37324012 PMCID: PMC10266282 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.963966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal malignancy is the third most common cancer and one of the prevalent causes of death globally. Around 20-25% of patients present with metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 50-60% of patients develop metastases in due course of the disease. Liver, followed by lung and lymph nodes, are the most common sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In such patients, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 19.2%. Although surgical resection is the primary mode of managing colorectal cancer metastases, only 10-25% of patients are competent for curative therapy. Hepatic insufficiency may be the aftermath of extensive surgical hepatectomy. Hence formal assessment of future liver remnant volume (FLR) is imperative prior to surgery to prevent hepatic failure. The evolution of minimally invasive interventional radiological techniques has enhanced the treatment algorithm of patients with colorectal cancer metastases. Studies have demonstrated that these techniques may address the limitations of curative resection, such as insufficient FLR, bi-lobar disease, and patients at higher risk for surgery. This review focuses on curative and palliative role through procedures including portal vein embolization, radioembolization, and ablation. Alongside, we deliberate various studies on conventional chemoembolization and chemoembolization with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads. The radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres has evolved as salvage therapy in surgically unresectable and chemo-resistant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Swarupa R. Vulasala
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Patrick D. Sutphin
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Samira Kethu
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States
| | - Nirmal K. Onteddu
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Flowers Hospital, Dothan, AL, United States
| | - Sanjeeva P. Kalva
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zaharia C, Veen T, Lea D, Kanani A, Alexeeva M, Søreide K. Histopathological Growth Pattern in Colorectal Liver Metastasis and The Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010181. [PMID: 36612177 PMCID: PMC9818232 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Almost half of all patients with colorectal cancer present with or eventually develop metastasis, most frequently in the liver. Understanding the histopathological growth patterns and tumor immune microenvironment of colorectal liver metastases may help determine treatment strategies and assess prognosis. A literature search was conducted to gather information on cancer biology, histopathological growth patterns, and the tumor immune microenvironment in colorectal liver metastases, including their mechanisms and their impact on clinical outcomes. A first consensus on histopathological growth patterns emerged in 2017, identifying five growth patterns. Later studies found benefits from a two-tier system, desmoplastic and non-desmoplastic, incorporated into the updated 2022 consensus. Furthermore, the tumor immune microenvironment shows additional characteristic features with relevance to cancer biology. This includes density of T-cells (CD8+), expression of claudin-2, presence of vessel co-option versus angiogenesis, as well as several other factors. The relation between histopathological growth patterns and the tumor immune microenvironment delineates distinct subtypes of cancer biology. The distinct subtypes are found to correlate with risk of metastasis or relapse, and hence to clinical outcome and long-term survival in each patient. In order to optimize personalized and precision therapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases, further investigation into the mechanisms of cancer biology and their translational aspects to novel treatment targets is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Zaharia
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Torhild Veen
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Dordi Lea
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Arezo Kanani
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Marina Alexeeva
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, N-7804 Bergen, Norway
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang JW, Huang SH, Qin JM. Clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2022; 30:897-913. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v30.i20.897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the common malignant tumors of the digestive system in clinical practice. Due to the anatomical characteristics of the colorectum itself, colorectal cancer is prone to liver metastasis. Approximately 15%-25% of colorectal cancer cases are complicated with liver metastasis at diagnosis, 15%-25% are complicated with liver metastasis after radical resection of colorectal cancer, and 80%-90% with liver metastasis cannot undergo radical resection initially. The 5-year survival rate is less than 5%, and liver metastasis is the main cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer. In recent years, with the clinical application of effective chemotherapy and molecular targeted drugs, as well as the rapid development of surgical techniques, an individualized safe, efficient, fast, treatment plan can be formulated according to patients' age, primary colorectal tumor location, degree of differentiation, Ras and B-Raf gene status, tumor size, number and distribution of metastases in the liver. By shrinking the tumor volume in the liver and increasing the residual liver volume, liver metastatic tumors can undergo surgical resection or disease-free status can be achieved in patients with liver metastasis. As a result, patients with colorectal liver metastases can achieve a 5-year survival rate of 30%-57%, which greatly improves the prognosis after operation. According to the postoperative adverse factors, individualized preventive measures are worked out to reduce the impact of adverse factors and improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases. In this paper, we systematically discuss the clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases by reviewing the relevant domestic and foreign literature, so as to provide a theoretical reference for the selection of clinical treatment and program for patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Wei Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai 201805, China
| | - Sun-Hua Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai 201805, China
| | - Jian-Min Qin
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai 201805, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang HW, Jin KM, Li J, Wang K, Xing BC. Postoperative complications predict poor outcomes only in patients with a low modified clinical score after resection of colorectal liver metastases: a retrospective cohort study. Updates Surg 2022; 74:1601-1610. [PMID: 35859226 PMCID: PMC9481509 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01312-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The aim was to identify the optimal criteria of postoperative complications (POCs) for predicting oncological outcomes after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) and to investigate the variable prognostic implications of POCs according to the modified clinical score (M-CS). We identified 751 patients who underwent curative hepatic resection for CRLM between 2007 and 2018. Patients were categorized based on the M-CS. The impact of the severity [≥ Clavien-Dindo grade (C-D) III or comprehensive complication index (CCI) ≥ 26.2] or type [any infectious complications of POC (Inf-poc)] of POC on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was assessed by univariate and multivariable analyses in different groups. Patients with a major or infectious complication were not associated with either RFS or OS in multivariable analysis of the whole cohort. However, patients with a high CCI had a worse OS (HR 1.51, P = 0.004). Among patients with low M-CS, patients with high CCI had worse OS (HR 1.49, P = 0.035) and RFS (HR 1.32, P = 0.048) than those without high CCI. In contrast, the survival disadvantage of a high CCI was not present in patients with a high M-CS. Compared to Inf-poc or major complications, a high CCI decreased long-term OS in patients treated with hepatectomy for CRLM. High CCI has a variable prognostic impact after hepatic resection for CRLM depending on the M-CS. POC is not a decisive factor to justify the use of hepatectomy for CRLM in patients with high M-CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Wei Wang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Ke-Min Jin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Juan Li
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Kun Wang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Bao-Cai Xing
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Role of Transhepatic Arterial Radioembolization in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1579-1589. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03268-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
12
|
Jost R, Al-Shatti N, Ghosn M, Bonnet B, Champiat S, Deschamps F, Gelli M, Boige V, Danlos FX, Susini S, Hollebecque A, Ammari S, Marabelle A, de Baere T, Tselikas L. Synergizing liver systemic treatments with interventional oncology: friend or foe? Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20220548. [PMID: 36075034 PMCID: PMC9815737 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Interventional radiology techniques provide excellent local tumor control for small tumors in various organs, but several limitations can hamper the oncological outcomes such as the tumor size or the number of lesions. Technical improvements, optimal patient selection and combination with systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been successfully developed to overcome these barriers.In this setting, chemotherapy and targeted therapies aim to diminish the tumor burden in addition to local treatments, while immunotherapies may have a synergistic effect in terms of mechanism of action on the tumor cell as well as the immune environment, with multiple treatment combinations being available. Finally, interventional Rrdiology treatments often increase tumor antigen exposure to the immune system, and thus stimulate a specific antitumor immune response that can act beyond the treated site. Notwithstanding their many benefits, combination treatment may also result in complications, the most feared may be auto-immune-related adverse events.In early studies, several combined therapies have shown promising levels of safety and efficacy, particularly in hepatocellular carcinoma.This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of results of combined therapies for primary and secondary liver malignancies. Recent advances and future perspectives will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaël Jost
- Département d’Anésthésie, Chirurgie et Imagerie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Mario Ghosn
- Département d’Anésthésie, Chirurgie et Imagerie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Baptiste Bonnet
- Département d’Anésthésie, Chirurgie et Imagerie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Frederic Deschamps
- Département d’Anésthésie, Chirurgie et Imagerie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Maximiliano Gelli
- Département d’Anésthésie, Chirurgie et Imagerie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Valérie Boige
- Department of medical oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Antoine Hollebecque
- Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique et d’Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sharma NK, Kappadath SC, Chuong M, Folkert M, Gibbs P, Jabbour SK, Jeyarajah DR, Kennedy A, Liu D, Meyer JE, Mikell J, Patel RS, Yang G, Mourtada F. The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for permanent implant brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for liver tumors. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:569-591. [PMID: 35599080 PMCID: PMC10868645 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a multidisciplinary consensus for high quality multidisciplinary implementation of brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres transarterial radioembolization (90Y TARE) for primary and metastatic cancers in the liver. METHODS AND MATERIALS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) and colleagues with multidisciplinary expertise in liver tumor therapy formulated guidelines for 90Y TARE for unresectable primary liver malignancies and unresectable metastatic cancer to the liver. The consensus is provided on the most recent literature and clinical experience. RESULTS The ABS strongly recommends the use of 90Y microsphere brachytherapy for the definitive/palliative treatment of unresectable liver cancer when recommended by the multidisciplinary team. A quality management program must be implemented at the start of 90Y TARE program development and follow-up data should be tracked for efficacy and toxicity. Patient-specific dosimetry optimized for treatment intent is recommended when conducting 90Y TARE. Implementation in patients on systemic therapy should account for factors that may enhance treatment related toxicity without delaying treatment inappropriately. Further management and salvage therapy options including retreatment with 90Y TARE should be carefully considered. CONCLUSIONS ABS consensus for implementing a safe 90Y TARE program for liver cancer in the multidisciplinary setting is presented. It builds on previous guidelines to include recommendations for appropriate implementation based on current literature and practices in experienced centers. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use this document as a guide to formulate their clinical practices and to adopt the most recent dose reporting policies that are critical for a unified outcome analysis of future effectiveness studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navesh K Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Hershey School of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - S Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Michael Folkert
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Radiation Medicine at the Center for Advanced Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | - David Liu
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Rahul S Patel
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Gary Yang
- Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Firas Mourtada
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Entezari P, Gabr A, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ. Yttrium-90 for colorectal liver metastasis - the promising role of radiation segmentectomy as an alternative local cure. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39:620-626. [DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1933215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pouya Entezari
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ahmed Gabr
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Robert J. Lewandowski
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Papamichail M, Pizanias M, Heaton ND, M P, M P, Nd H. Minimizing the risk of small-for-size syndrome after liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:113-133. [PMID: 34961675 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary and secondary liver tumors are not always amenable to resection due to location and size. Inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) may prevent patients from having a curative resection or may result in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality from complications related to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). DATA SOURCES This comprehensive review analyzed the principles, mechanism and risk factors associated with SFSS and presented current available options in the evaluation of FLR when planning liver surgery. In addition, it provided a detailed description of specific modalities that can be used before, during or after surgery, in order to optimize the conditions for a safe resection and minimize the risk of SFSS. RESULTS Several methods which aim to reduce tumor burden, preserve healthy liver parenchyma, induce hypertrophy of FLR or prevent postoperative complications help minimize the risk of SFSS. CONCLUSIONS With those techniques the indications of radical treatment for patients with liver tumors have significantly expanded. The successful outcome depends on appropriate patient selection, the individualization and modification of interventions and the right timing of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Papamichail
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK.
| | - Michail Pizanias
- Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK
| | - Nigel D Heaton
- Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Papamichail M
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Pizanias M
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Heaton Nd
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aliseda D, Martí-Cruchaga P, Zozaya G, Benito A, Lopez-Olaondo L, Rodríguez-Fraile M, Bilbao JI, Hidalgo F, Iñarrairaegui M, Ciria R, Pardo F, Sangro B, Rotellar F. Pure laparoscopic major liver resection after yttrium 90 radioembolization: a case-matched series analysis of feasibility and outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1099-1111. [PMID: 35229168 PMCID: PMC9151566 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02474-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Liver surgery after radioembolization (RE) entails highly demanding and challenging procedures due to the frequent combination of large tumors, severe RE-related adhesions, and the necessity of conducting major hepatectomies. Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and its associated advantages could provide benefits, as yet unreported, to these patients. The current study evaluated feasibility, morbidity, mortality, and survival outcomes for major laparoscopic liver resection after radioembolization. Material and methods In this retrospective, single-center study patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or metastases from colorectal cancer undergoing major laparoscopic hepatectomy after RE were identified from institutional databases. They were matched (1:2) on several pre-operative characteristics to a group of patients that underwent major LLR for the same malignancies during the same period but without previous RE. Results From March 2011 to November 2020, 9 patients underwent a major LLR after RE. No differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss (50 vs. 150 ml; p = 0.621), operative time (478 vs. 407 min; p = 0.135) or pedicle clamping time (90.5 vs 74 min; p = 0.133) between the post-RE LLR and the matched group. Similarly, no differences were observed on hospital stay (median 3 vs. 4 days; p = 0.300), Clavien–Dindo ≥ III complications (2 vs. 1 cases; p = 0.250), specific liver morbidity (1 vs. 1 case p = 1.000), or 90 day mortality (0 vs. 0; p = 1.000). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach for post radioembolization patients may be a feasible and safe procedure with excellent surgical and oncological outcomes and meets the current standards for laparoscopic liver resections. Further studies with larger series are needed to confirm the results herein presented. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-022-02474-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Aliseda
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pablo Martí-Cruchaga
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gabriel Zozaya
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alberto Benito
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Luis Lopez-Olaondo
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Anesthesiology Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Nuclear Medicine Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José I Bilbao
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Francisco Hidalgo
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Anesthesiology Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Iñarrairaegui
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Rubén Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Fernando Pardo
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. .,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Scafa D, Muedder T, Holz JA, Koch D, Nour Y, Garbe S, Gonzalez-Carmona MA, Feldmann G, Vilz TO, Köksal M, Giordano FA, Schmeel LC, Sarria GR. Dosimetric Comparison of Intraoperative Radiotherapy and SRS for Liver Metastases. Front Oncol 2021; 11:767468. [PMID: 34926271 PMCID: PMC8674179 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.767468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives To perform a dosimetric comparison between kilovoltage intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) simulating both deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and free-breathing (FB) modalities for patients with liver metastases. Methods/Materials Diagnostic computed tomographies (CT) of patients carrying one or two lesions <4 cm and who underwent surgery were retrospectively screened and randomly selected for the study. For DIBH-SRS, a gross target volume (GTV) plus planning target volume (PTV) were delineated. For FB-SRS, a GTV plus an internal target volume (ITV) and PTV were defined. Accounting for the maximal GTV diameters, a modified GTV (GTV-IORT) was expanded circumferentially to simulate a resection cavity. The best suitable round-applicator size was thereafter selected. All treatment plans were calculated homogeneously to deliver 40 Gy. Doses delivered to organs at risk (OAR) and target volumes were compared for IORT vs. both SRS modalities. Results Eight patients encompassing 10 lesions were included in the study. The mean liver volume was 2,050.97 cm3 (SD, 650.82), and the mean GTV volume was 12.23 cm3 (SD, 12.62). As for target structures, GTV-IORT [19.44 cm3 (SD, 17.26)] were significantly smaller than both PTV DIBH-SRS [30.74 cm3 (SD, 24.64), p = 0.002] and PTV FB-SRS [75.82 cm3 (SD, 45.65), p = 0.002]. The median applicator size was 3 cm (1.5–4.5), and the mean IORT simulated delivery time was 45.45 min (SD, 19.88). All constraints were met in all modalities. Liver V9.1 showed significantly smaller volumes with IORT [63.39 cm3 (SD, 35.67)] when compared to DIBH-SRS [150.12 cm3 (SD, 81.43), p = 0.002] or FB-SRS [306.13 cm3 (SD, 128.75), p = 0.002]. No other statistical or dosimetrically relevant difference was observed for stomach, spinal cord, or biliary tract. Mean IORT D90 was 85.3% (SD, 6.05), whereas D95 for DIBH-SRS and FB-SRS were 99.03% (SD, 1.71; p = 0.042) and 98.04% (SD, 3.46; p = 0.036), respectively. Conclusion Kilovoltage IORT bears the potential as novel add-on treatment for resectable liver metastases, significantly reducing healthy liver exposure to radiation in comparison to SRS. Prospective clinical evidence is required to confirm this hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Muedder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jasmin A Holz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Younéss Nour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Georg Feldmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tim O Vilz
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Søreide K. Time to halt perioperative chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastasis? Br J Surg 2021; 109:242-243. [PMID: 34875032 PMCID: PMC10364718 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Stavanger University Hospital and University of Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The Role of Ablative Radiotherapy to Liver Oligometastases from Colorectal Cancer. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-021-00472-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
This review describes recent data supporting locoregional ablative radiation in the treatment of oligometastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Recent Findings
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) demonstrates high rates of local control in colorectal cancer liver metastases when a biologically equivalent dose of > 100 Gy is delivered. Future innovations to improve the efficacy of SBRT include MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) to enhance target accuracy, systemic immune activation to treat extrahepatic disease, and genomic customization. Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) with y-90 is an intra-arterial therapy that delivers high doses to liver metastases internally which has shown to increase liver disease control in phase 3 trials. Advancements in transarterial radioembolization (TARE) dosimetry could improve local control and decrease toxicity.
Summary
SBRT and SIRT are both promising options in treating unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases. Identification of oligometastatic patients who receive long-term disease control from either therapy is essential. Future advancements focusing on improving radiation design and customization could further improve efficacy and toxicity.
Collapse
|
20
|
Moslim MA, Jeyarajah DR. Narrative review of the role of yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy in the surgical management of colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:2438-2446. [PMID: 34790404 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-96] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is complicated and benefits from a multidisciplinary team approach. Liver-directed therapy has been emerging as a modality for better progression-free control. In its early years, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 (Y-90) was confined as an end-of-line therapy. However, literature has supported other roles including: a first-line treatment for CRLM alone or in combination with systemic chemotherapy; an adjunct to second or third-line chemotherapy; and a salvage treatment for chemo-refractory disease. Although future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy may take 3-12 months, the SIRT effect on loco-regional disease control has rendered it to be a useful tool in some pathologies with certain strategic goals. This paper reviews the use of SIRT with Y-90 in a surgical treatment pathway. This includes: (I) an element of multidisciplinary treatment of low-volume CRLMs, (II) convert an R1 to R0 resection by sterilizing the margins of tumor near critical structures, and (III) radiation lobectomy to induce contralateral hypertrophy in order to aid in a safer resection. There are many opportunities to validate the role of SIRT as a first-line therapy along with surgical resection including an umbrella clinical trial design.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ettrich TJ, Hüttner FJ, Lisson C, Gani C, Prasad V, Seufferlein T. [Multimodal, interdisciplinary therapeutic concepts for liver metastasized colorectal cancer]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2021; 146:1468-1477. [PMID: 34741292 DOI: 10.1055/a-1391-5273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
About half of all patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) develop metastases mainly in the liver during the course of their disease. Metastatic disease is associated with a low 5-year overall survival rate of only 5-7 %, particularly when there is no possibility of local treatment. However, if there is an opportunity to resect the metastases, especially isolated liver metastases, the chance of long-term survival is approximately 15-27 % after both primary resection or secondary resection after neoadjuvant pretreatment. Overall, long-term survival of patients with metastatic CRC has improved significantly in recent years due to a combination of modern systemic therapies, advanced liver surgery and local ablative procedures.Of note, for the vast majority of patients, metastatic resection does not mean cure, but a significant prolongation of overall survival with a good quality of life. Chemotherapy-free intervals after metastasis resection maintain quality of life and can help to reduce toxicity.In this review, we would like to present the "toolbox" for the multidisciplinary treatment of metastatic CRC and give recommendations how the individual modalities should be optimally used, considering tumor-specific characteristics and patient preferences.
Collapse
|
22
|
Czauderna C, Luley K, von Bubnoff N, Marquardt JU. Tailored Systemic Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:11780. [PMID: 34769209 PMCID: PMC8584068 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver metastases are the most common site of metastatic spread in colorectal cancer. Current treatment approaches involve effective systemic therapies in combination with surgical and/or interventional strategies. Multimodal strategies greatly improved clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer over the last decades. Identification of predictive and prognostic biomarkers helped to comprehensively refine individual targeted treatment approaches and resulted in median overall survival rates of 30 months or longer. Current guidelines, thus, recommend treatment selection according to patients' performance status, tumor localization and stage as well as the tumor's molecular and genetic status. Here, we outline the latest developments in molecular decision-making for patients with upfront resectable, potentially or initially unresectable and non/never-resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Czauderna
- Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein—Campus Lübeck, 23558 Lübeck, Germany;
| | - Kim Luley
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein—Campus Lübeck, 23558 Lübeck, Germany; (K.L.); (N.v.B.)
| | - Nikolas von Bubnoff
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein—Campus Lübeck, 23558 Lübeck, Germany; (K.L.); (N.v.B.)
| | - Jens U. Marquardt
- Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein—Campus Lübeck, 23558 Lübeck, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Webster LA, Villalobos A, Majdalany BS, Bercu ZL, Gandhi RT, Kokabi N. Standard Radiation Dosimetry Models: What Interventional Radiologists Need to Know. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021; 38:405-411. [PMID: 34629706 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Thoughtful and accurate dosimetry is critical to obtain the safest and most efficacious yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers. Three dosimetry models are currently used in clinical practice, namely, body surface area model, medical internal radiation dose model, and the partition model. The objective of this review is to briefly outline the history behind Y90 dosimetry and the difference between the aforementioned models. When applying these three models to a single case, the differences between them are further demonstrated. Each dosimetry model in clinical practice has its own benefits and limitations. Therefore, it is incumbent upon practicing interventional radiologists to be aware of these differences to optimize treatment outcomes for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linzi Arndt Webster
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alexander Villalobos
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Bill S Majdalany
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Zachary L Bercu
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ripal T Gandhi
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zane KE, Cloyd JM, Mumtaz KS, Wadhwa V, Makary MS. Metastatic disease to the liver: Locoregional therapy strategies and outcomes. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:725-745. [PMID: 34631439 PMCID: PMC8479345 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Secondary cancers of the liver are more than twenty times more common than primary tumors and are incurable in most cases. While surgical resection and systemic chemotherapy are often the first-line therapy for metastatic liver disease, a majority of patients present with bilobar disease not amenable to curative local resection. Furthermore, by the time metastasis to the liver has developed, many tumors demonstrate a degree of resistance to systemic chemotherapy. Fortunately, catheter-directed and percutaneous locoregional approaches have evolved as major treatment modalities for unresectable metastatic disease. These novel techniques can be used for diverse applications ranging from curative intent for small localized tumors, downstaging of large tumors for resection, or locoregional control and palliation of advanced disease. Their use has been associated with increased tumor response, increased disease-free and overall survival, and decreased morbidity and mortality in a broad range of metastatic disease. This review explores recent advances in liver-directed therapies for metastatic liver disease from primary colorectal, neuroendocrine, breast, and lung cancer, as well as uveal melanoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and sarcoma. Therapies discussed include bland transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and ablative therapies, with a focus on current treatment approaches, outcomes of locoregional therapy, and future directions in each type of metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie E Zane
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Khalid S Mumtaz
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Vibhor Wadhwa
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York City, NY 10065, United States
| | - Mina S Makary
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liu Y, Chang W, Zhou B, Wei Y, Tang W, Liang F, Chen Y, Yan Z, Lv M, Ren L, Xu J. Conventional transarterial chemoembolization combined with systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone as second-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2021; 108:373-379. [PMID: 33611431 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and systemic therapy has the potential to treat chemotherapy-refractory unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). This study aimed to compare survival after this combined treatment versus systemic chemotherapy alone. METHODS This single-centre RCT included patients with unresectable CRLMs that progressed after first-line treatment. Patients were randomized on a 1 : 1 basis to either systemic chemotherapy with or without cTACE, without further stratification. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were overall response rate, disease control rate, conversion rate to liver resection, overall survival, and adverse events. RESULTS Of 180 patients recruited, 168 were randomized. Eighty-five patients in arm A received systemic chemotherapy plus cTACE and 83 in arm B received systemic chemotherapy alone. Median PFS was longer in arm A than B (6.7 versus 3.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95 per cent c.i. 0.49 to 0.91; P = 0.009), but did not translate into prolonged median overall survival (18.4 versus 14.8 months; HR = 0.92, 0.62 to 1.36; P = 0.669). Overall response rates (20 versus 22 per cent; P = 0.788) and conversion rate to liver resection (18 versus 16 per cent; P = 0.730) were no different between arms A and B. The disease control rate was higher in arm A than arm B (67 versus 51 per cent; P = 0.030). No adverse event higher than grade 3 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events was observed during treatment. CONCLUSION Systemic chemotherapy plus cTACE is a safe option as second-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastases, with a modest effect on PFS. Registration number: NCT03783559 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Liu
- Colorectal Cancer Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - W Chang
- Colorectal Cancer Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Centre of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive, Shanghai, China
| | - B Zhou
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Y Wei
- Colorectal Cancer Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Centre of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive, Shanghai, China
| | - W Tang
- Colorectal Cancer Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Centre of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive, Shanghai, China
| | - F Liang
- Department of Biostatistics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Y Chen
- Colorectal Cancer Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Z Yan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - M Lv
- Department of Biostatistics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - L Ren
- Colorectal Cancer Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Centre of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive, Shanghai, China
| | - J Xu
- Colorectal Cancer Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Centre of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yang H, Xie S, Liang B, Tang Q, Liu H, Wang D, Huang G. Exosomal IDH1 increases the resistance of colorectal cancer cells to 5-Fluorouracil. J Cancer 2021; 12:4862-4872. [PMID: 34234856 PMCID: PMC8247374 DOI: 10.7150/jca.58846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemoresistance challenges the clinical treatment of colorectal cancer and requires an urgent solution. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) is a key enzyme involved in glucose metabolism that mediates the malignant transformation of tumors. However, the mechanisms by which IDH1 is involved in colorectal cancer cell proliferation and drug resistance induction remain unclear. In this study, we found that IDH1 was highly expressed in human colorectal cancer tissues and could be used to indicate a high-grade tumor. In vitro gene overexpression and knockdown were used to determine whether IDH1 promoted the proliferation of the colorectal cancer cell line HCT8 and resistance to 5-Fluorouracil (5FU). Further studies have shown that the 5FU-resistant cell line, HCT8FU, secreted exosomes that contained a high level of IDH1 protein. The exosomal IDH1 derived from 5FU-resistant cells enhanced the resistance of 5FU-sensitive cells. Metabolic assays revealed that exosomes derived from 5FU-resistant cells promoted a decrease in the level of IDH1-mediated NADPH, which is associated with the development of 5FU resistance in colorectal cancer cells. Therefore, exosomal IDH1 may be the transmitter and driver of chemoresistance in colorectal cancer and a potential chemotherapy target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Yang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Sha Xie
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China
| | - Beibei Liang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China
| | - Qiqi Tang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China
| | - Huanchen Liu
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China
| | - Dongliang Wang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Gang Huang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kwan J, Pua U. Review of Intra-Arterial Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061371. [PMID: 33803606 PMCID: PMC8003062 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Colorectal cancer liver metastasis occurs in more than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer and is thought to be the most common cause of death from this cancer. The mainstay of treatment for inoperable liver metastasis has been combination systemic chemotherapy with or without the addition of biological targeted therapy with a goal for disease downstaging, for potential curative resection, or more frequently, for disease control. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies including hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are alternative treatment strategies that have shown promising results, most commonly in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. In recent years, their role in the first-line setting in conjunction with concurrent systemic chemotherapy has also been explored. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future. Abstract The liver is frequently the most common site of metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer, occurring in more than 50% of patients. While surgical resection remains the only potential curative option, it is only eligible in 15–20% of patients at presentation. In the past two decades, major advances in modern chemotherapy and personalized biological agents have improved overall survival in patients with unresectable liver metastasis. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies such as hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are treatment strategies which are increasingly being considered to improve local tumor response and to reduce systemic side effects. Currently, these therapies are mostly used in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. However, their use in the first-line setting in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy as well as to a lesser degree, in a neoadjuvant setting, for downstaging to resection have also been investigated. Furthermore, some clinicians have considered these therapies as a temporizing tool for local disease control in patients undergoing a chemotherapy ‘holiday’ or acting as a bridge in patients between different lines of systemic treatment. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future.
Collapse
|
28
|
Garlipp B. Yttrium 90 Therapy: Is the Future Surgical? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 43:1936-1937. [PMID: 32974774 PMCID: PMC7649158 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02645-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Garlipp
- Otto von Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schadde E, Grunhagen DJ, Verhoef C, Krzywon L, Metrakos P. Limitations in resectability of colorectal liver metastases 2020 - A systematic approach for clinicians and patients. Semin Cancer Biol 2020; 71:10-20. [PMID: 32980499 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) affect over 50 % of all patients with colorectal cancer, which is the second leading cause of cancer in the western world. Resection of CRLM may provide cure and improves survival over chemotherapy alone. However, resectability of CLRM has to be decided in multidisciplinary tumor boards and is based on oncological factors, technical factors and patient factors. The advances of chemotherapy lead to the abolition of contraindications to resection in favor of technical resectability, but somatic mutations and molecular subtyping may improve selection of patients for resection in the future. Technical factors center around anatomy of the lesions, volume of the remnant liver and quality of the liver parenchymal. Multiple strategies have been developed to overcome volume limitations and they are reviewed here. The least investigated topic is how to select the right patients among an elderly and frail patient population for the large variety of technical options specifically for bi-lobar CRLM to keep 90-day mortality as low as possible. The review is an overview over the current state-of-the art and a systematic guide to the topic of resectability of CRLM for both clinicians and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Schadde
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA; Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Dirk J Grunhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jeyarajah DR, Doyle MBM, Espat NJ, Hansen PD, Iannitti DA, Kim J, Thambi-Pillai T, Visser BC. Role of yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy in the treatment of liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer: an evidence-based expert consensus algorithm. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:443-460. [PMID: 32399284 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2020.01.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases is associated with greater survival compared with non-surgical treatment, and a meaningful possibility of cure. However, the majority of patients are not eligible for resection and may require other non-surgical interventions, such as liver-directed therapies, to be converted to surgical eligibility. Given the number of available therapies, a general framework is needed that outlines the specific roles of chemotherapy, surgery, and locoregional treatments [including selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with Y-90 microspheres]. Using a data-driven, modified Delphi process, an expert panel of surgical oncologists, transplant surgeons, and hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgeons convened to create a comprehensive, evidence-based treatment algorithm that includes appropriate treatment options for patients stratified by their eligibility for surgical treatment. The group coined a novel, more inclusive phrase for targeted locoregional tumor treatment (a blanket term for resection, ablation, and other emerging locoregional treatments): local parenchymal tumor destruction therapy. The expert panel proposed new nomenclature for 3 distinct disease categories of liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer that is consistent with other tumor types: (I) surgically treatable (resectable); (II) surgically untreatable (borderline resectable); (III) advanced surgically untreatable (unresectable) disease. Patients may present at any point in the algorithm and move between categories depending on their response to therapy. The broad intent of therapy is to transition patients toward individualized treatments where possible, given the survival advantage that resection offers in the context of a comprehensive treatment plan. This article reviews what is known about the role of SIRT with Y-90 as neoadjuvant, definitive, or palliative therapy in these different clinical situations and provides insight into when treatment with SIRT with Y-90 may be appropriate and useful, organized into distinct treatment algorithm steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - N Joseph Espat
- Department of Surgery, Roger Williams Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Paul D Hansen
- HPB Surgery, Providence Portland Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - David A Iannitti
- HPB Surgery, Atrium Health, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Joseph Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Thavam Thambi-Pillai
- Department of Surgery, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | - Brendan C Visser
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Birgin E, Rasbach E, Seyfried S, Rathmann N, Diehl SJ, Schoenberg SO, Reissfelder C, Rahbari NN. Contralateral Liver Hypertrophy and Oncological Outcome Following Radioembolization with 90Y-Microspheres: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12020294. [PMID: 32012709 PMCID: PMC7072354 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radioembolization with 90Y-microspheres has been reported to induce contralateral liver hypertrophy with simultaneous ipsilateral control of tumor growth. The aim of the present systematic review was to summarize the evidence of contralateral liver hypertrophy and oncological outcome following unilateral treatment with radioembolization. A systematic literature search using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries for studies published between 2008 and 2020 was performed. A total of 16 studies, comprising 602 patients, were included. The median kinetic growth rate per week of the contralateral liver lobe was 0.7% and declined slightly over time. The local tumor control was 84%. Surgical resection after radioembolization was carried out in 109 out of 362 patients (30%). Although the available data suggest that radioembolization prior to major hepatectomy is safe with a promising oncological outcome, the definitive role of radioembolization requires assessment within controlled clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emrullah Birgin
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Erik Rasbach
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Steffen Seyfried
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Nils Rathmann
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (N.R.); (S.J.D.); (S.O.S.)
| | - Steffen J. Diehl
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (N.R.); (S.J.D.); (S.O.S.)
| | - Stefan O. Schoenberg
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (N.R.); (S.J.D.); (S.O.S.)
| | - Christoph Reissfelder
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Nuh N. Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; (E.B.); (E.R.); (S.S.); (C.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-621-383-3591
| |
Collapse
|