Oesophageal reflex responses: abnormalities of the enteric nervous system in patients with oesophageal symptoms

Esophageal motor and sensory disorders: presentation, evaluation, and treatment

Esophageal motor and sensory disorders are relatively rare conditions in the general population and afflicted patients are often initially misdiagnosed as having gastroesophageal reflux disease. Tests for these disorders have imperfect gold standards and are adjuncts to sound diagnostic reasoning. Treatments are palliative and have not been rigorously evaluated for some disorders. Symptoms and complications from disease progression and relapse are common, so that patients need continued follow-up.

Effect of tumour and chemoradiotherapy on oesophageal motility

BACKGROUND

The contribution of dysmotility to dysphagia in oesophageal cancer is unclear.

AIM

To examine oesophageal motility in patients with oesophageal carcinoma and to assess the effect of chemoradiotherapy on motility.

METHODS

Stationary manometry and 24-hour pH-metry were performed in 12 patients with oesophageal carcinoma and one week following completion of chemoradiotherapy using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin and 40Gy radiotherapy.

RESULTS

All patients had abnormal motility prior to treatment. Peristalsis was impaired in 11 patients with a mean (SD) of 25% (9) of waves normally propagated. Eight patients had 20% or more simultaneous waves. Following chemoradiotherapy, the percentage of waves normally propagated increased from 25% (9) to 521% (10) (p < 0.03) and normal peristalsis was restored in four patients. The percentage of simultaneous waves decreased from 38% (11) to 21.6% (10) (p = 0.129) while the percentage of dropped or increased waves decreased from 20% (11) to 8.3% (4) (p = 0.264).

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal motility is disturbed in oesophageal cancer. Dysphagia in oesophageal cancer may be partly explained by oesophageal dysmotility. This is improved by chemotherapy.

Autonomic dysfunction in non-specific disorders of oesophageal motility

OBJECTIVE

Non-specific disorders of oesophageal motility are common manometric findings in patients presenting with non-cardiac chest pain, dysphagia, odynophagia, regurgitation and symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Impairment of vagal function has been reported in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and achalasia. The role of autonomic dysfunction in patients with non-specific oesophageal disorders is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess autonomic function in patients with non-specific disorders of oesophageal motility.

METHOD

An automated computerized system (AUTOCAFT) was used to evaluate autonomic function in 62 patients presenting with non-cardiac chest pain and associated oesophageal symptoms. Cardiovascular reflex responses to deep breathing, Valsalva manoeuvre, posture and sustained handgrip were measured and results compared with 14 sex- and age-matched control subjects.

RESULTS

Forty percent of patients with non-specific disorders of oesophageal motility proved to have significant abnormalities of vagal function. There was also a high incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be autonomic dysfunction in patients with non-specific oesophageal motility disorders. Autonomic function tests may prove to be a useful tool in the assessment of oesophageal function.

Abnormal neurophysiology in patients with oesophageal motility disorders

BACKGROUND

The pathology of oesophageal motility disorders is poorly understood. Oesophageal manometry provides only a descriptive assessment of luminal pressure changes. This study applied the investigative methods of the neurophysiologist to gain insight into the pathophysiology of these disorders.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers and 28 patients with oesophageal motility disorders underwent oesophageal manometry and balloon stimulation studies. Cortical evoked potentials (CEPs) in response to electrical stimulation of the oesophagus and oesophageal motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebral cortex were recorded.

RESULTS

Only two patients had abnormalities with a primary defect in muscle function. Fifteen had abnormal responses to balloon stimulation with normal CEPs and MEPs, suggesting a defect in the intrinsic nerves of the oesophagus. Five with achalasia did not respond to balloon stimulation and had abnormal CEPs and MEPs, suggesting widespread neural defects. The remainder had a variety of abnormal responses suggesting possible defects in receptor sensitivity, central processing or sensory neuropathy. There was no correlation between the manometric diagnosis and abnormal neurophysiology, except in patients with achalasia.

CONCLUSION

Neurophysiological testing suggests that oesophageal motility disorders are most commonly due to a variety of neural defects.