Surgical resection of recurrent colonic cancer

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Anastomotic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Comparison With Nonanastomotic Local Recurrences

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic recurrence is thought to be caused by implantation of tumor cells to the anastomotic line; however, its risk factors and prognostic significance remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to clarify the risk factors for anastomotic recurrence in colorectal cancer and assess the prognosis in comparison to nonanastomotic local recurrence.

DESIGN

A single-center retrospective observational study.

SETTINGS

The medical records of the study participants were retrospectively collected from the Department of Surgical Oncology at the University of Tokyo Hospital database.

PATIENTS

This study included 1584 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between January 2005 and December 2017. We focused on 15 patients who had an anastomotic recurrence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were the risk factors of anastomotic recurrence at the primary resection and prognosis data in comparison to that of nonanastomotic local recurrence.

RESULTS

There were 15 patients (0.95%) with anastomotic recurrence and 35 (2.21%) with nonanastomotic local recurrence. Univariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis and advanced T stage are the risk factors for anastomotic recurrence. The prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence was similar to that of those with nonanastomotic local recurrence who underwent resection.

LIMITATIONS

The small number of patients with anastomotic recurrence is a major limitation of this study. Additionally, the retrospective study design may have increased the risk of selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastasis and advanced T stage were associated with anastomotic recurrence. The prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence was similar to that with resected nonanastomotic local recurrence. Thus, surveillance should be carefully continued while considering the poor prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C92 .

CARACTERSTICAS CLINICOPATOLGICAS DE LA RECURRENCIA ANASTOMTICA DESPUS DE LA RESECCIN CURATIVA DEL CNCER COLORRECTAL COMPARACIN CON LAS RECURRENCIAS LOCALES NO ANASTOMTICAS

ANTECEDENTES:Se cree que la recurrencia anastomótica es causada por la implantación de células tumorales en la línea anastomótica; sin embargo, los factores de riesgo asociados y el significado en cuanto a pronóstico siguen sin estar claros.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo aclarar los factores de riesgo para la recurrencia anastomótica en el cáncer colorrectal y evaluar el pronóstico en comparación con la recurrencia local no anastomótica.DISEÑO:Un estudio observacional retrospectivo de un solo centro.ESCENARIO:Los registros médicos de los participantes del estudio se recopilaron retrospectivamente de la base de datos del Departamento de Cirugía Oncológica del Hospital de la Universidad de Tokio.PACIENTES:Este estudio incluyó a 1584 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal que se sometieron a resección quirúrgica entre enero de 2005 y diciembre de 2017. Nos enfocamos en 15 pacientes que tuvieron recurrencia anastomótica.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las principales medidas de resultado fueron los factores de riesgo de recurrencia anastomótica en la resección primaria y los datos de pronóstico en comparación con la recurrencia local no anastomótica.RESULTADOS:Hubo 15 pacientes (0.95%) con recurrencia anastomótica y 35 (2.21%) con recurrencia local no anastomótica. El análisis univariable reveló que la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos y el estadio T avanzado son los factores de riesgo para la recurrencia anastomótica. El pronóstico de los pacientes con recidiva anastomótica fue similar al de aquellos con recidiva local no anastomótica sometidos a resección.LIMITACIONES:El pequeño número de pacientes con recurrencia anastomótica es una limitación importante de este estudio. Además, el diseño retrospectivo del estudio puede haber aumentado el riesgo de sesgo de selección.CONCLUSIONES:La metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos y el estadio T avanzado se asociaron con recurrencia anastomótica. El pronóstico de los pacientes con recidiva anastomótica fue similar al de la recidiva local no anastomótica resecada. Por lo tanto, la vigilancia debe continuarse cuidadosamente considerando el mal pronóstico de los pacientes con recurrencia anastomótica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C92 . (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

Locoregionally Recurrent Colon Cancer: How Far Have We Come? A Population-Based, Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The reported outcomes of locoregionally recurrent colon cancer (LRCC) are poor, but the literature about LRCC is scarce and aged. Recent population-based studies to provide current insight into LRCC are warranted. This study aimed to provide an overview of the incidence, risk factors, treatment, and overall survival (OS) of patients with LRCC after curative resection of stage I-III primary colon cancer.

METHODS

Data on disease recurrence were collected for all patients with a diagnosis of non-metastasized primary colon cancer in the Netherlands during the first 6 months of 2015. Patients who underwent surgical resection (N = 3544) were included in this study. The 3-year cumulative incidence, risk factors, treatment, and OS for patients with LRCC were determined.

RESULTS

The 3-year cumulative incidence of LRCC was 3.8%. Synchronous distant metastases (LRCC-M1) were diagnosed in 62.7% of the patients. The risk factors for LRCC were age of 70 years or older, pT4, pN1-2, and R1-2. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of LRCC for high-risk stage II and stage III patients [hazard ratio (HR), 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.93]. The median OS for the patients with LRCC was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.1-18.3 months). Curative-intent treatment was given to 22.4% of the LRCC patients, and the subsequent 3 years OS was 71% (95% CI 58-87%). The patients treated with palliative treatment and best supportive care showed 3-year OS rates of 15% (95% CI 7.0-31%) and 3.7% (95% CI 1.0-14%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative incidence of LRCC was low, and adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a decreased risk for LRCC among targeted patients. Curative-intent treatment was given to nearly 1 in 4 LRCC patients, and the OS for this group was high.

Long-term outcomes of resection for locoregional recurrence of colon cancer: A retrospective descriptive cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Resection for isolated distant recurrence of colon cancer is well accepted. Resection for locoregionally recurrent colon cancer (LRCC) is not well studied. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of curative-intent resection for LRCC.

METHODS

All patients undergoing curative-intent resection for LRCC at three specialized cancer centers affiliated with the University of Toronto were identified (1993-2017). Follow-up included serial clinical assessment, colonoscopy, CEA, and cross-sectional imaging. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and time to re-recurrence were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence function. The association between resection margins and outcome was assessed with Cox models.

RESULTS

117 patients were included in the study cohort. Median follow-up was 53 months (IQR: 34-101). OS was 75% (95% CI: 68-84) at 5 years, and 69% (95% CI: 59-79) at 10 years. CSS was 78% (95% CI: 70-86) at 5 years and 72% (95% CI: 63-83) at 10 years. The rate of re-recurrence was 22% (95% CI: 14-31) at 5 years, and 27% (95% CI: 16-39) at 10 years. Negative resection margin (R0) was associated with improved OS (HR 3.33, 95% CI: 1.85-6.00, p < 0.01). There were no postoperative deaths; complications with Clavien-Dindo grade > II occurred in 12% of patients. Perioperative chemotherapy was used in 63% of patients and radiotherapy in 37%.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with LRCC, excellent OS, CSS and low re-recurrence rates were observed, and R0 resection predicted better outcomes. These findings support consideration of resection for LRCC in fit patients after review at a multidisciplinary cancer conference.

Curative-intent surgery for isolated locoregional recurrence of colon cancer: Review of the literature and institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Locoregional recurrence of colon cancer (LRCC) following curative resection is an underreported clinical entity, especially regarding isolated LRCC which is amenable for surgery. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on incidence of LRCC and surgical treatment with corresponding outcome, and to describe an institutional experience with curative-intent surgery, whether or not as part of a multimodality approach.

METHODS

The PubMed and Medline literature databases 1978-2017 were searched and retrieved articles were assessed for eligibility. Based on a prospectively maintained database since 2010 at a tertiary referral center, original patient files were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Systematic literature review resulted in 11 studies reporting on incidence of LRCC, which ranged from 3.1% to 19.0% before 2010, and from 4.4% to 6.7% in three most recent studies. Twelve identified studies reported on outcome of surgically treated LRCC, with a median survival of 30 and 33 months in the two largest studies. The institutional database entailed 17 patients who underwent resection of isolated LRCC between 2010 and 2018. Median time to recurrence was 19 months. After a median follow-up after resection of LRCC of 20 months, 7 patients had died, 9 patients were alive without evidence of disease and 1 patient with evidence of disease; Median DFS was 36 months and 3-year OS was 65%.

CONCLUSION

Locoregional recurrence of colon cancer occurs in about 5% in most recent series, of whom selected patients are eligible for surgical treatment, with a fair chance of long-term disease control.

Curative intent resection for loco-regionally recurrent colon cancer: Cleveland clinic experience

BACKGROUND

Locoregional colon cancer recurrence occurs in around 10% of patients following initial curative intent primary resection. We hypothesized oncological results can vary based on the recurrence site. Our aim was to determine outcomes for patients undergoing resection with curative intent for locally recurrent colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients with locoregional recurrence after curative intent resection for colon cancer were identified (1999-2017). Demographics, operative details and outcome data were recorded. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival differences.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (mean age, 62) were included. The most common recurrence site was primary anastomosis (48%). R0 resection was obtained in 68%. Major morbidity occurred in 37%. Patients with anastomotic recurrence had a statistically significant overall survival compared to other sites (71.6 vs. 40.8 months respectively with a P value of 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent outcomes are possible for curative intent recurrent colon cancer surgery. The site of loco-regional recurrence plays a significant role in outcomes. Table of Contents Summary: Colon cancer recurrence can be treated surgically with optimal outcomes. Anastomotic recurrence is associated with improved survival.

Surgical Resection with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Recurrent Appendiceal Cancer Invading the External Iliac Vessels

Recent advancements in multimodal therapy can provide oncologic benefits for patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. This report presents a case of locoregionally recurrent appendiceal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection with vascular reconstruction. A 68-year-old Japanese woman was diagnosed with appendiceal cancer and underwent ileocecal resection. The pathological evaluation revealed KRAS-mutant adenocarcinoma with the final stage of T4bN1M0. She received oral fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. One year later, she was found to have peritoneal dissemination in the pelvic cavity and vaginal metastasis. She received an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgical resection. One year after the second surgery, she developed a locoregional recurrence involving the right external iliac vessels and small intestine. She received an irinotecan-based regimen with bevacizumab as neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surgical resection. At first, a femoro-femoral bypass was made to secure the blood supply to the right lower extremities. Subsequently, an en bloc resection including the recurrent tumor and the external iliac vessels was completed. Surgical resection for recurrent colorectal cancer is often technically challenging because of the tumor location and invasion to adjacent organs. In this case, a surgical approach with persistent chemotherapy achieved oncologic resection of locoregionally recurrent appendiceal cancer.

Prognostic Significance of Peritoneal Metastasis in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Patients With R0 Resection: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Stage IV colorectal cancer encompasses various clinical conditions. The differences in prognosis after surgery between different metastatic organs have not been fully investigated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess prognostic significance in peritoneal metastasis in R0 resected stage IV colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients with R0 resected stage IV colorectal cancer; they were categorized into 3 groups according to the number and location of metastatic organs, including single-organ metastasis in the peritoneum, single-organ metastasis at sites except the peritoneum, and multiple-organ metastases.

SETTINGS

This study used data accumulated by the Japanese Study Group for Postoperative Follow-Up of Colorectal Cancer.

PATIENTS

A total of 1133 patients with R0 resected stage IV colorectal cancer were registered retrospectively between 1997 and 2007 in 20 referral hospitals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cancer-specific survival rates between the groups were measured.

RESULTS

The median cancer-specific survival of the single-organ metastasis in the peritoneum group was considerably shorter than that of the single-organ metastasis at a site other than the peritoneum group and was almost comparable to that of the multiple-organ metastases group (3.41 years, 6.20 years, and 2.99 years). In a multivariate analysis of cancer-specific survival, peritoneal dissemination was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor of survival. The median postrecurrence survival of single-organ metastasis in the peritoneum group was considerably shorter than that of the single-organ metastasis at a site other than the peritoneum group. Approximately half of the patients who experienced recurrence of single-organ metastasis in the peritoneum experienced peritoneal recurrence.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective, population-based study that requires a prospective design to validate its conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal metastasis of colorectal cancer frequently recurred in the peritoneum even after R0 resection. The cancer-specific survival of the single-organ metastasis in the peritoneum group was as poor as that of the multiple-organ metastases group. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A398.

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Colon Cancer

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons is dedicated to ensuring high-quality patient care by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is composed of society members who are chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive and not prescriptive. Their purpose is to provide information on which decisions can be made, rather than to dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, health care workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. It should be recognized that these guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient.

A Comparison of Survival by Site of Metastatic Resection in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic resection (MR) of liver-limited disease is an effective therapy for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Despite limited data, this approach has been expanded to include MR of other sites, such as the lung, locoregional, and other distant disease (ODD). We performed a population-based study of patients with mCRC who had undergone MR and compared survival between MR of the liver and MR of other sites.

METHODS

Patients with mCRC who were referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency between 1995 and 2010 were reviewed. Patients were included if they had an R0 MR with a negative margin and no residual disease. The site of MR was classified according to collaborative staging criteria as liver, lung, locoregional, or ODD. Median overall survival (mOS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using the log-rank test. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to compare mOS, while adjusting for known prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 2082 patients with mCRC were identified, of whom 257 underwent R0 MR. Sites of MR included liver (65%), lung (16%), locoregional (5%), and ODD (14%). The mOS of liver, lung, locoregional, and ODD were 48.0, 42.8, 37.2, and 26.2 months, respectively (P = .087). On multivariate analysis, only MR of ODD had a significantly different survival estimate than MR of the liver (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.80; P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with limited lung and locoregional disease seem to have a comparable survival advantage from MR as patients with liver-limited metastases.

Proactive Management for Gastric, Colorectal and Appendiceal Malignancies: Preventing Peritoneal Metastases with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)

An integrated treatment strategy using peritonectomy procedures plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is now a clinical standard of care in selected patients with peritoneal metastases and primary peritoneal tumors. This comprehensive approach can offer many patients, who hitherto had no hope of cure, a good quality of life and survival despite limited morbidity. The increasingly successful results and chance of interfering in the natural history of disease has prompted research to develop for some clinical conditions a therapeutic strategy designed to prevent malignant peritoneal dissemination before it becomes clinically evident and treat it microscopically (tertiary prevention). The main factor governing successful cytoreductive surgery and predicting outcome is the extent of peritoneal spread assessed with the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). In peritoneal metastases from colorectal and gastric cancer the PCI score acquires a specific role acting as the cut-off between patients who can undergo curative surgery or palliation. Long-term results show that the only group enjoying favorable results are patients with limited disease (a statistical minority). By applying to appropriately selected patients with primary malignancies a proactive management strategy including HIPEC we can treat patients with microscopic peritoneal dissemination and therefore at PCI 0. Among treated conditions pseudomyxoma peritonei enjoys the best results. But a major future advance comes from identifying among lesions at major risk of pseudomyxoma.

Long-Term Outcomes of Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Standardized Technique Operation With Curative Intent

There is no defined standard surgical technique accepted worldwide for colon cancer, especially on the extent of resection and lymphadenectomy, resulting in technical variations among surgeons. Nearly all analyses employ more than one surgeon, thus giving heterogeneous results on surgical treatment. This study aims to evaluate long-term follow-up results of colon cancer patients who were operated on by a single senior colorectal surgeon using a standardized technique with curative intent, and to compare these results with the literature. A total of 269 consecutive patients who were operated on with standardized technique between January 2003 and June 2013 were enrolled in this study. Standardized technique means separation of the mesocolic fascia from the parietal plane with sharp dissection and ligation of the supplying vessels closely to their roots. Patients were assessed in terms of postoperative morbidity, mortality, disease recurrence, and survival. Operations were carried out with a 99.3% R0 resection rate and mean lymph node count of 17.7 nodes per patient. Surviving patients were followed up for a mean period of 57.8 months, and a total of 19.7% disease recurrence was recorded. Mean survival was 113.9 months. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 78% and 75.8% for disease-free survival, 82.6% and 72.9% for overall survival, and 87.5% and 82.9% for cancer-specific survival, respectively. R1 resection and pathologic characteristics of the tumor were found to be the most important prognostic factors according to univariate and Cox regression analyses. Standardization of surgical therapy and a dedicated team are thought to make significant contributions to the improvement of prognosis.

Therapeutic management and outcome of locoregional recurrence after curative colorectal cancer therapy-a single-center analysis

Locoregional tumor recurrence after curative therapy for colorectal cancer is therapeutically challenging and associated with poor prognosis. Goal of this single-center study was to analyze patients with locoregional recurrence with regard to therapeutic strategies and outcome for colon and rectal cancer each. Charts of all patients surgically treated for colorectal cancer in the period from 2000 to 2011 (n = 1296) were examined; patients with locoregional recurrence (n = 86) were then further analyzed. Fifty-three (10.2%) patients with rectal and 33 (5.6%) patients with colon cancer developed a locoregional recurrence, median 24.5 months after first diagnosis. Recurrence-specific therapy was applied in the majority of the patients (84.8% colon, 90.7% rectum); a surgical approach was undertaken in 82.1% (colon) and in 56.3% (rectum). Five-year overall survival after locoregional recurrence was 13% for rectal cancer and 9% for colon cancer. Itemized analysis for the approached therapeutic regimens revealed that radical recurrence resection (R0) significantly prolongs overall survival (p = 0.003) in rectal cancer, as does a surgical approach itself, as compared to conservative treatment modalities. If feasible, oncologic radical resection of the relapse (R0) significantly influences patient outcome and overall survival in rectal cancer.

Anastomotic Recurrence of Colon Cancer-is it a Local Recurrence, a Second Primary, or a Metastatic Disease (Local Manifestation of Systemic Disease)?

The aim of this study is to review the literature to find out the exact etiology of anastomotic cancers of colon post resection and differentiate them between a recurrence, second primary, and metastatic disease (local manifestation of systemic disease). Web-based literature search was done, and datas collected. We searched PubMed for papers using the keywords colon cancer recurrence, anastomotic recurrence, and recurrent colon carcinoma. We also searched for systematic review in the same topic. In addition, we used our personal referrence archive. Anastomotic recurrences of colon are postulated to arise due to inadequate margins, tumor implantation by exfoliated cells, altered biological properties of bowel anastomosis, and missed synchronous lesions. Some tumors are unique with repeated recurrence after repeated resection. Duration after primary surgery plays a major role in differentiating recurrent and second primary lesions. Repeated recurrences after repeated resections have to be considered a manifestation of systemic disease or metastatic disease due to the virulence of the disease. A detailed analysis and study of patients with colonic anastomotic lesion are required to differentiate it between a recurrent, a second primary lesion, and a metastatic disease (local manifestation of a systemic disease). The nomenclature is significant to study the survival of these patients, as a second primary lesion will have different survival compared to that of recurrent lesions.

Patterns of recurrence following complete cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

CytoReductive Surgery (CRS) combined with Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) has an established role in the treatment of peritoneally metastasized colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to describe the recurrence patterns and to evaluate treatment options and related survival.

METHODS

Patients treated with CRS + HIPEC in two tertiary referral centers between April 2005 and March 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The prognostic value of several parameters was calculated using Cox Regression.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty two of 287 patients (46%) with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with complete CRS and HIPEC were diagnosed with recurrent disease, after a median disease-free interval of 11.4 months. Recurrence were locoregional (43%), distant metastases (26%) or both (31%). Thirty-two of the 132 patients with recurrences (24%) were treated surgically with curative intent, which extended the median survival from 12 months to 43 months, compared to palliative treatment (best supportive care or chemotherapy; P < 0.001). Initial nodal status (P = 0.01) and the number of affected regions at initial CRS (P = 0.02) were significantly correlated to survival after disease recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Disease recurrence after CRS and HIPEC is common; in selected patients, an aggressive surgical approach may be beneficial and extend survival.