Diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis types 1 and 2

Prevalence and clinical features of patients with autoimmune pancreatitis and inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are categorized into immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs). While AIP is a pancreato-biliary IMID with an increased incidence and prevalence among patients with IBD, its features are still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the prevalence and clinical characteristics of AIP-IBD patients.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched to identify observational studies assessing AIP and IBD. The primary outcome was the prevalence of IBD among AIP patients, and vice versa. Secondary outcomes included clinical findings and outcomes of each IMID in AIP-IBD patients. The pooled rate of each outcome was determined using a random effects model.

RESULTS

For primary outcomes, 40 observational studies with 4031 AIP patients were included and the pooled prevalence of IBD was 10.5% (95% CI 7.2-15.0%). Meanwhile, five studies with 10,551 IBD patients were included and the pooled prevalence of AIP was 0.6% (95% CI 0.2-1.9%). For secondary outcomes, 53 observational studies with 469 AIP-IBD patients were assessed. The rates of type 2 AIP and ulcerative colitis were 79.2% (95% CI 69.1-86.6%) and 74.8% (95% CI 68.2-80.4%), respectively. We also demonstrated AIP-IBD patients were at a significant increased risk of AIP recurrence and colectomy compared with patients with either AIP or IBD (RR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.1 and P = 0.014 and RR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.9-6.9, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis reported the prevalence of AIP-IBD patients and demonstrated patients with both IMIDs had a high risk of poor outcomes.

HLA-DRB1∗16 and -DQB1∗05 alleles are strongly associated with autoimmune pancreatitis in a cohort of hundred patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune diseases are often associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes, indicating that changes in major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-dependent self-peptide or antigen presentation contribute to autoimmunity. In our study, we aimed to investigate HLA alleles in a large European cohort of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) patients.

METHODS

Hundred patients with AIP, diagnosed and classified according to the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC), were prospectively enrolled in the study. Forty-four patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) and 254 healthy subjects served as control groups. DNA was isolated from blood samples and two-digit HLA typing was performed with sequence-specific primer (SSP-) PCR. HLA allele association strength to AIP was calculated as odds ratio.

RESULTS

We uncovered a strong enrichment of HLA-DQB1 homozygosity in type 1 and type 2 AIP patients. Moreover, a significantly increased incidence of the HLA-DRB1∗16 and HLA-DQB1∗05 alleles and a concomitant lack of the HLA-DRB1∗13 allele was detected in AIP type 1 and type 2 patients. In contrast, the HLA-DQB1∗02 allele was underrepresented in the 'not otherwise specified' (NOS) AIP subtype. We detected no significant difference in the HLA-DRB3, HLA-DRB4 and HLA-DRB5 allele frequency in our cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Although AIP type 1 and type 2 are characterized by distinct histopathological characteristics, both subtypes are associated with the same HLA alleles, indicating that the disease might rely on similar immunogenic mechanisms. However, AIP NOS represented another subclass of AIP.

The features and clinical outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease associated with autoimmune pancreatitis: A greater awareness is needed

The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been described in 5% to 40% of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence, endoscopic features, and outcome of IBD in association with AIP.A retrospective analysis including all consecutive patients with AIP and a histological diagnosis of IBD from 2010 to 2020 was performed. Demographical data, AIP, and IBD features, as well as clinical course, were recorded.Among 267 AIP patients, 45 were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) (27 men, mean age 31.6), all with a diagnosis of type 2 AIP. The most frequent presentation of AIP was acute pancreatitis (55.5%). Both diffuse (51.1%) and focal (48.9%) pancreatic involvement were observed. The AIP relapse rate was 11.1% over a mean follow-up of 55 months. In 69% of patients, the interval time between the diagnosis of AIP and UC was <1 year. When UC was present at AIP onset, UC was in clinical remission in 50% of patients. Fecal calprotectin levels, when available, were elevated in 86.6% of these patients. Mostly, mild-moderate pancolitis was initially diagnosed (55.5%). During follow-up, escalation therapy for UC was required in 40% of patients after a mean time of 45 months. Two patients (4.4%) underwent colectomy.The prevalence of UC in AIP patients was 17%. Mild pancolitis with a low rate of colectomy was found. Greater awareness is needed to avoid a delayed diagnosis of UC, and the dosage of fecal calprotectin levels could have a role in this setting.

IgG4-related disease: Changing epidemiology and new thoughts on a multisystem disease

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) represents an immune-mediated fibroinflammatory condition with peculiar histopathologic changes that can affect various organs. In 2012 its unified nomenclature was published, which allows to abandon other synonymous names. Up to now, only little is known about its epidemiology around the world. However, although it is generally considered a rare condition, the number of patients with IgG4-RD is increasing enormously. Likewise, the annual number of publications on this subject has increased progressively. The spectrum of clinical manifestations in IgG4-RD is highly variable, depending on the severity of the disease as well as the presence of organ(s) involvement. This review gives an overview on changing epidemiology of IgG4-RD focusing the attention on the large cohorts of patients published in the literature.

Alcohol and Smoking Mediated Modulations in Adaptive Immunity in Pancreatitis

Pancreatitis is a condition of pancreatic inflammation driven by injury to the pancreatic parenchyma. The extent of acinar insult, intensity, and type of immune response determines the severity of the disease. Smoking, alcohol and autoimmune pancreatitis are some of the predominant risk factors that increase the risk of pancreatitis by differentially influencing the adaptive immune system. The overall decrease in peripheral lymphocyte (T-, B- and (natural killer T-) NKT-cell) count and increased infiltration into the damaged pancreatic tissue highlight the contribution of adaptive immunity in the disease pathology. Smoking and alcohol modulate the responsiveness and apoptosis of T- and B-cells during pancreatic insult. Acute pancreatitis worsens with smoking and alcohol, leading to the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome, suggesting the critical role of adaptive immunity in fatal outcomes such as multiple organ dysfunction. The presence of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-lymphocytes and perforin-expressing cells in the fibrotic tissue in chronic pancreatitis modulate the severity of the disease. Due to their important role in altering the severity of the disease, attempts to target adaptive immune mediators will be critical for the development of novel therapeutic interventions.

Pitfalls in the MDCT of pancreatic cancer: strategies for minimizing errors

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is a widely used cross-sectional imaging modality for initial evaluation of patients with suspected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, diagnosis of PDAC can be challenging due to numerous pitfalls associated with image acquisition and interpretation, including technical factors, imaging features, and cognitive errors. Accurate diagnosis requires familiarity with these pitfalls, as these can be minimized using systematic strategies. Suboptimal acquisition protocols and other technical errors such as motion artifacts and incomplete anatomical coverage increase the risk of misdiagnosis. Interpretation of images can be challenging due to intrinsic tumor features (including small and isoenhancing masses, exophytic masses, subtle pancreatic duct irregularities, and diffuse tumor infiltration), presence of coexisting pathology (including chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm), mimickers of PDAC (including focal fatty infiltration and focal pancreatitis), distracting findings, and satisfaction of search. Awareness of pitfalls associated with the diagnosis of PDAC along with the strategies to avoid them will help radiologists to minimize technical and interpretation errors. Cognizance and mitigation of these errors can lead to earlier PDAC diagnosis and ultimately improve patient prognosis.

T Lymphocytes: A Promising Immunotherapeutic Target for Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer?

Pancreatic disorders cause a broad spectrum of clinical diseases, mainly including acute and chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, and are associated with high global rates of morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, the pathogenesis of pancreatic disease remains obscure, and there is a lack of specific treatments. T lymphocytes (T cells) play a vital role in the adaptive immune systems of multicellular organisms. During pancreatic disease development, local imbalances in T-cell subsets in inflammatory and tumor environments and the circulation have been observed. Furthermore, agents targeting T cells have been shown to reverse the natural course of pancreatic diseases. In this review, we have discussed the clinical relevance of T-cell alterations as a potential outcome predictor and the underlying mechanisms, as well as the present status of immunotherapy targeting T cells in pancreatitis and neoplasms. The breakthrough findings summarized in this review have important implications for innovative drug development and the prospective use of immunotherapy for pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Duct-obstructive pancreatitis with granulocytic epithelial lesion in a patient with ulcerative colitis: An atypical manifestation of type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis?

Type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) typically presents with diffuse or focal enlargement of the pancreas; however, its diverse clinical presentation has not yet been clarified. We herein described a 46-year-old man with a 1-month history of ulcerative colitis who presented with imaging features of a mass-like lesion in the pancreatic body with upstream duct dilatation and serum CA19-9 elevation. He underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy for suspected malignancy. Histologically, the area radiologically suspected to be duct dilatation consisted of necrotic tissue, in which the disrupted main pancreatic duct was involved. The area radiologically suspected to be the mass lesion showed features of pancreatitis without discrete mass. In addition, several ducts showed neutrophilic duct injury similar to granulocytic epithelial lesions observed in type 2 AIP. Immunohistochemistry revealed the aberrant expression of IL-8 in the pancreatic ductules and infiltrating CD3-positive T-lymphocytes, findings recently identified in type 2 AIP. The present case is not typical for either type 2 AIP or other known conditions, but extreme examples of type 2 AIP may present with ductal obstruction because of severe neutrophilic duct injury. IL-8 immunostaining may also assist in establishing a diagnosis of type 2 AIP with an atypical presentation.

Value of anti-plasminogen binding peptide, anti-carbonic anhydrase II, immunoglobulin G4, and other serological markers for the differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer

The diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and its differential diagnosis from pancreatic cancer (PC) can be challenging. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the value of anti-plasminogen binding peptide (a-PBP), immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), and anti-carbonic anhydrase-II (a-CA-II), together with other serological markers whose value is not fully elucidated.The serum levels of a-PBP, IgG4, IgG, anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-lactoferrin (a-LF), a-CA-II, and rheumatoid factor (RF) were evaluated in patients with AIP (n = 29), PC (n = 17), pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (P-NEN, n = 12), and alcoholic chronic pancreatitis (ACP, n = 41). ANCA were measured in the AIP patients.There was no statistically significant difference in mean a-PBP values in AIP compared with PC. A ROC curve showed that, when using a cut-off of 38.3 U, low values of a-PBP had a sensitivity and specificity of 45% and 71% for differentiating AIP from PC. The sensitivity and specificity of IgG4 (cut-off 1.4 g/L) for differentiating AIP from PC was 45% and 88%, but rose to 52% and 88% when using a cut-off of 1.09 g/L. When using this cut-off, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating type 1 AIP from PC was 68% and 88%. None of the other markers were significantly changed in AIP versus PC. For differentiation of type 1 and type 2 AIP, the only significant differences were IgG4 in type 1 AIP (P < .01), with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 80%, and c-ANCA elevations found in some type 2 AIP patients (P < .05).The only serological marker for which we found a statistically significant difference in mean values between AIP and PC was IgG4. However, the value of IgG4 for the distinction of AIP from PC was limited, probably in part due to the relatively high number of type 2 AIP patients in our study. In accord with recent publications, our data do not support a role of increased serum a-PBP for the diagnosis of AIP.

Distinct pathophysiological cytokine profiles for discrimination between autoimmune pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Discriminating between autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can be challenging. In this retrospective study, levels of serum and tissue cytokines were analyzed as part of the clinical strategy for the preoperative differentiation between AIP and PDAC. The identification of differential cytokine profiles may help to prevent unnecessary surgical resection and allow optimal treatment of these pathologies.

METHODS

To compare the cytokine profiles of AIP, CP, and PDAC patients, serum and pancreatic tissue homogenates were subjected to multiplex analysis of 17 inflammatory mediators. In total, serum from 73 patients, composed of 29 AIP (14 AIP-1 and 15 AIP-2), 17 CP, and 27 PDAC, and pancreatic tissue from 36 patients, including 12 AIP (six AIP-1 and six AIP-2), 12 CP, and 12 PDAC, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Comparing AIP and PDAC patients' serum, significantly higher concentrations were found in AIP for interleukins IL-1β, IL-7, IL-13, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). G-CSF also allowed discrimination of AIP from CP. Furthermore, once AIP was divided into subtypes, significantly higher serum levels for IL-7 and G-CSF were measured in both subtypes of AIP and in AIP-2 for IL-1β when compared to PDAC. G-CSF and TNF-α were also significantly differentially expressed in tissue homogenates between AIP-2 and PDAC.

CONCLUSIONS

The cytokines IL-1β, IL-7, and G-CSF can be routinely measured in patients' serum, providing an elegant and non-invasive approach for differential diagnosis. G-CSF is a good candidate to supplement the currently known serum markers in predictive tests for AIP and represents a basis for a combined blood test to differentiate AIP and particularly AIP-2 from PDAC, enhancing the possibility of appropriate treatment.

Outcome and Genetic Factors in IgG4-Associated Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Cholangitis: A Single Center Experience

Introduction. Most investigations on autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) were published on Asian cohorts while those on Caucasians are limited. However, there might be differences related to the origin. Patients and Methods. We analyzed 36 patients and compared type 1 (AIP1) with type 2 (AIP2). Results. The majority of patients suffered from AIP1 (55.6%). AIP1 patients were significantly older than AIP2 patients (54.4 versus 40.8 years). Moreover, 85.0% of AIP1 patients had concurrent autoimmune cholangitis (AIC) while 18.8% of AIP2 patients suffered from overlap to ulcerative colitis (UC). However, AIP1 patients revealed a cholestatic course and had significantly higher immunoglobulin G4 levels (IgG4). When compared to allele frequencies in healthy controls, in patients with AIP1 HLA-B8 reached statistical significance. Response to steroids was excellent in both groups, but we noticed high rates of relapse especially in AIP1 patients. Finally, 3 patients with AIP1 were diagnosed with cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC). Conclusion. In contrast to Asian studies, we found an almost equal distribution of AIP1 and AIP2 patients in our German cohort. AIP2 patients were younger and mostly of female gender whereas AIP1 patients revealed higher IgG4 levels and involvement of the biliary tract in sense of IgG4-associated cholangitis.

From Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestation, and Diagnosis to Treatment: An Overview on Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a special type of chronic pancreatitis which is autoimmune mediated. The international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) 2011 proposed two types of AIP: type I is associated with histological pattern of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP), characterized by serum IgG4 elevation, whereas type 2 is named idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP), with granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL) and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) negative. The pathogenic mechanism is unclear now; based on genetic factors, disease specific or related antigens, innate and adaptive immunity may be involved. The most common clinical manifestations of AIP are obstructive jaundice and upper abdominal pain. The diagnosis can be made by a combination of parenchymal and ductal imaging, serum IgG4 concentrations, pancreatic histology, extrapancreatic disease, and glucocorticoid responsiveness according to ICDC 2011. Because of the clinical and imaging similarities with pancreatic cancer, general work-up should be done carefully to exclude pancreatic malignant tumor before empirical trial of glucocorticoid treatment. Glucocorticoid is the most common drug for AIP to induce remission, while there still exists controversy on steroid maintenance and treatment for relapse. Further studies should be done to identify more specific serum biomarkers for AIP, the pathogenic mechanisms, and the treatment for relapse.

Identification of Novel Serum Autoantibodies for Differential Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The lack of specific biochemical markers is a major drawback for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). The aims were to characterize the autoantibody profiles in AIP and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to identify circulating autoantibodies that could be diagnostic markers differentiating PDAC and the AIP subtypes.

METHODS

Tissue lysates obtained from the resected pancreas of patients with AIP and patients with PDAC were separated by 2-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis subsequently immunoblotted with autologous sera. The immunoreactive spots were subjected to nanoscale liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry to identify serum autoantibodies to tissue-derived autoantigens associated with AIP and PDAC. Autoantibody concentrations for selected autoantigens were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

RESULTS

A total of 115 immunoreactive spots were identified by 2-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/immunobloting. Nanoscale liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry-based analysis revealed 68 autoantigens in AIP, 26 in PDAC, and 21 present in both diseases. Assessment of 13 selected AIP autoantibody serum levels revealed that 7 of them had significantly higher titers in AIP versus PDAC. IgG-directed against transaldolase could significantly differentiate between the 2 AIP subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel panel of AIP autoantibodies is promising to supplement the predictive tests for AIP of the currently known autoantigens and represent a basis for a combined blood test to differentiate AIP from PDAC in the future.

Mass-forming type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis mimicking pancreatic cancer

We reported three cases of mass-forming type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) that were preoperatively suspected to be pancreatic cancer, and reviewed their clinicopathological features. Radiological findings in the patients revealed hypoattenuating masses in the early phase or a stricture of the main pancreatic duct with upstream dilatation, which was consistent with the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Histopathologically, the lesions were well demarcated and met all diagnostic criteria for immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related AIP, including the presence of periductal lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, obliterative phlebitis, storiform fibrosis and abundant IgG4-positive plasma cells. However, the adjacent uninvolved pancreatic duct and lobular structures were well preserved. And in all patients, none or some of the aforementioned characteristics were observed. We suggest that some cases of focal AIP may progress to more severe grades and exhibit mass formation, although remaining localized. These focal cases of AIP are difficult to distinguish from pancreatic cancer. To our knowledge, this report is the first to present a histopathological comparison of mass-forming AIP with the adjacent uninvolved pancreatic tissues.

Epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis: A retrospective analysis of 53 patients

BACKGROUND

Most of the data about epidemiology, clinical presentation and treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is based on case series or small study groups. We therefore analyzed all cases of AIP treated at our clinic retrospectively.

METHODS

We searched our clinical database for the diagnosis pancreatitis between January 2007 and June 2014, selected patients with AIP and entered all relevant information in a database for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In total 53 patients with AIP were treated at our institution, 62% with type 1 and 23% with type 2 AIP. Gender distribution was male/female 3.1:1 for type 1 and 1:1.2 for type 2 AIP. The median age was 63.0 and 32.5 years for type 1 and type 2 AIP, respectively. The most common symptom is abdominal pain particular in patients with type 2 AIP whereas jaundice was only apparent in patients with type 1 AIP. The international diagnostic criteria seem to facilitate diagnosis of AIP as unnecessary pancreatic surgery in patients with AIP decreases. In 62.6% of the patients therapy was indicated and 84.8% showed a response to initial therapy with steroids. Recurring disease occurred in 28.3% of the cases but only 3.8% suffered a second relapse. Permanent maintenance therapy with steroids or additional therapy with immunomodulatory drugs is successful in recurring disease.

CONCLUSION

Our data further corroborate previous findings on epidemiology, clinical presentation and treatment of AIP. AIP is a well manageable autoimmune disease in most patients. Better biopsy techniques and simplified diagnostic criteria might further alleviate diagnosis of AIP.

IgG4-related autoimmune diseases: Polymorphous presentation complicates diagnosis and treatment

BACKGROUND

IgG4-associated autoimmune diseases are systemic diseases affecting multiple organs of the body. Autoimmune pancreatitis, with a prevalence of 2.2 per 100,000 people, is one such disease. Because these multi-organ diseases present in highly variable ways, they were long thought just to affect individual organ systems. This only underscores the importance of familiarity with these diseases for routine clinical practice.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, and on the published conclusions of international consensus conferences.

RESULTS

The current scientific understanding of this group of diseases is based largely on case reports and small case series; there have not been any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to date. Any organ system can be affected, including (for example) the biliary pathways, salivary glands, kidneys, lymph nodes, thyroid gland, and blood vessels. Macroscopically, these diseases cause diffuse organ swelling and the formation of pseudotumorous masses. Histopathologically, they are characterized by a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with IgG4-positive plasma cells, which leads via an autoimmune mechanism to the typical histologic findings--storiform fibrosis ("storiform" = whorled, like a straw mat) and obliterative, i.e., vessel-occluding, phlebitis. A mixed Th1 and Th2 immune response seems to play an important role in pathogenesis, while the role of IgG4 antibodies, which are not pathogenic in themselves, is still unclear. Glucocorticoid treatment leads to remission in 98% of cases and is usually continued for 12 months as maintenance therapy. Most patients undergo remission even if untreated. Steroid-resistant disease can be treated with immune modulators.

CONCLUSION

IgG4-associated autoimmune diseases are becoming more common, but adequate, systematically obtained data are now available only from certain Asian countries. Interdisciplinary collaboration is a prerequisite to proper diagnosis and treatment. Treatment algorithms and RCTs are needed to point the way to organ-specific treatment in the future.