Mechanism underlying the negative effect of prostate volume on the outcome of extensive transperineal ultrasound-guided template prostate biopsy

Relationships between holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and prostate cancer

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a size-independent surgical option for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with excellent, durable functional outcomes. The prevalence of LUTS secondary to BPH and prostate cancer both increase with age, although the two diseases develop independently. Urologists often face a diagnostic dilemma, as men with LUTS secondary to BPH might also present with an elevated PSA and, therefore, need a diagnostic work-up to exclude prostate cancer. Nevertheless, ~15% of men with a negative elevated PSA work-up will undergo HoLEP and will be diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer at the time of HoLEP. Indeed, prostate cancer is often found in men undergoing HoLEP, and this situation can be challenging to manage. Variables associated with the detection of incidental prostate cancer, strategies to reduce incidental prostate cancer, as well as the natural history and management of this condition have been extensively studied, but further work in this area is still needed.

Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is a predictor of clinically significant prostate cancer at prostate biopsy

BACKGROUND

Inflammation plays critical roles at different stages of carcinogenesis and cancer progression. Several previous studies showed conflicting results for the predictive role of systemic inflammation markers in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancers (CSPCs). We aimed to determine the predictive roles of lymphocyte-to-monocyte (LMR) and eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (ELR) in the detection of CSPC at standard 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (12-core-TRUS-Bx) using our large-cohort database.

METHODS

Clinical and pathological data of a total of 1740 men, who underwent initial standard 12-core TRUS-Bx, were analyzed. LMR and ELR were calculated from the prebiopsy complete blood count. Definitions of CSPC, LMR, and ELR were "Gleason grade group ≥2," "the lymphocyte counts/the monocyte counts," and "the eosinophil counts/the lymphocyte counts," respectively.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and prostatic volume before TRUS-Bx were 7.59 (5.02-13.12) ng/ml and 38.2 (29.0-52.9) ml, respectively. Benign prostatic lesions, clinically insignificant prostate cancers (CIPCs), and CSPCs were detected in 1179 (67.8%), 180 (10.3%), and 381 (21.9%) patients, respectively. The patients with CSPCs had older age, a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus or hypertension, a higher rate of digital rectal examination abnormality, higher serum PSA level, lower serum testosterone level, and lower LMR than those with benign lesions or CIPCs. However, there was no difference in ELR among the three (benign lesions, CIPCs and CSPCs). In all the patients, multivariate regression analysis showed that lower LMR was an independent predictor of CSPCs compared with ELR. In the subset of men with prostate volume ≥39.3 ml, lower LMR was an independent predictor of CSPCs compared with ELR. In the subset of men with prostate volume <39.3 ml, men with lower LMR showed the tendency of having a higher probability of CSPCs without any statistical significance on the contrary to ELR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that LMR can play an independent predictive role in the detection of CSPCs at initial 12-core-TRUS-Bx compared with ELR. The predictive role of the LMR appears to be significant for men with larger prostate volume rather than those with smaller prostate volume.

Prostate cancer detection rate and Gleason score in relation to prostate volume as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging cognitive biopsy and standard biopsy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the relationship of the prostate cancer and Gleason scores (GSs) or ISUP Grade system with prostate volume (PV) as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cognitive biopsy and standard biopsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were collected from 659 patients who underwent MRI cognitive biopsy and standard biopsy from January 2014 to January 2018. The biopsies were performed because of increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (>4 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings. Transrectal ultrasound was used to measure PV.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer detection rates in patients with increased PVs of ≤40 cc and >40 cc were 68.8% and 51.6% (p<0.001), respectively. ISUP Grade group ≥2 (Gleason score ≥3+4) detection rates for increased PVs of ≤40 cc and >40 cc were 68% and 73%, and 22.3% and 37.8%, respectively, for those with ISUP Grade group ≥4 (Gleason score ≥8) (p=0.003). Among the patients with PV>40 cc, univariate logistic regression showed a significant relationship between ISUP Grade group ≥2 and PSA, free/total PSA, PSA density, and MRI (p<0.05). On multivariable logistic regression, MRI (p=0.014) and PSA (p=0.039) predicted ISUP Grade group ≥2 in patients with PV>40 cc.

CONCLUSION

Although the detection rates of prostate cancer decreased as PV increased, the detection of prostate cancer aggressiveness increased as PV increased. This increase in high ISUP Grade lesions with the rise in PV is due to the use of MRI during prostate biopsy with standard biopsy.