Long-term outcomes of complete versus incomplete revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary disease

Impact of completeness of revascularisation on long-term outcomes in patients with multivessel disease undergoing PCI: CR versus IR outcomes in multivessel CAD

AIMS

We aimed to study long-term clinical outcomes in patients with multivessel disease (MVD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over the last 10 years with respect to the completeness of revascularisation at a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 2,960 consecutive MVD patients taken for PCI between 2008 to 2017 were enrolled in the study with baseline demographic, procedural, and follow-up details retrieved from custom-made departmental software. Of those, 2,598 patients with follow-up details constituted the study cohort. Complete revascularisation (CR) was achieved in 1,854 (71.4%) and incomplete revascularisation (IR) in 744 (28.6%) patients. Propensity matching was performed and 740 matched pairs identified in the two groups. The primary endpoint was survival free of any major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with each individual MACE event being a secondary endpoint. IR occurred more often in patients with acute coronary syndrome (64.1% vs 58.3%, p=0.003), complex lesion intervention (40.7% vs 29.6%, p<0.001) and in those with mean stent length ≥38 mm per vessel intervened (21.0% vs 13.5%, p<0.001). Median follow-up was 54 months (interquartile range: 31-84 months). After propensity matching, CR resulted in a better survival free of all adverse events, i.e., 86.4% vs 81.1% (HR 1.52, CI: 1.21-2.02; p<0.01). Individual MACE endpoints were, however, not statistically different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In MVD patients undergoing PCI, CR results in better survival free of all adverse events including all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI, repeat revascularisation and recurrent angina.

Percutaneous Versus Surgical Revascularization for Acute Myocardial Infarction

INTRODUCTION

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a common medical condition in our clinical practice that should be treated with appropriate revascularization in a timely manner. Percutaneous revascularization (PR) has been the first-line treatment option when feasible. Limited data is available comparing PR to surgical revascularization (SR) in the AMI setting.

METHODS

Study population was extracted from the 2016 Nationwide Readmissions Data using International Classification of Diseases, tenth edition, clinical modifications/procedure coding system codes for AMI, PR, SR, and procedural complications. Study endpoints included in-hospital all-cause mortality, length of index hospital stay (LOS), stroke, acute kidney injury, bleeding, need for blood transfusion, acute respiratory failure, and total hospital charges.

RESULTS

The study identified 45,539 discharges with a principal admission diagnosis of AMI (38.7% ST elevation and 61.3% non-ST elevation) who had either PR or SR as a principal procedure (79.1% PR versus 20.9% SR). Single vessel revascularization was performed in 67.8% (93.1% had PR versus 6.9% had SR, p < 0.01). Multivessel revascularization was performed in 32.2% (64.8% had PR versus 35.2% had SR, p < 0.01). 83% of SR was in the setting of non-ST elevation AMI (NSTEMI). In comparison to SR, PR was associated with higher in-hospital all-cause mortality (3.7% versus 2.2%, p < 0.01), shorter LOS (4.3 versus 11.6 days, p < 0.01), and lower incidence of post-procedural stroke (1.0% versus 1.8%, p < 0.01), acute kidney injury (14.9% versus 24.8%, p < 0.01), bleeding (4.3% versus 47.1%, p < 0.01), need for blood transfusion (2.9% versus 18.5%, p < 0.01), acute respiratory failure (10.7% versus 19.8%, p < 0.01), and total hospital charges (120,590$ versus 229,917$, p < 0.01). These results persist after adjustment for baseline characteristics. In a subgroup analysis, SR mortality benefit persisted in patients who had multivessel revascularization (in both ST and non-ST elevation AMI), but not in single vessel revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients presented with AMI, PR was associated with higher in-hospital all-cause mortality but lower morbidity, shorter LOS, and lower total hospital charges than SR. However, the mortality benefit of SR was seen in multivessel revascularization only, and not in single vessel revascularization.

Multivessel Coronary Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Early revascularization can lead to better prognosis in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is better remains unknown. Methods: We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library database from inception until December 9, 2017, for articles that compare outcomes of CABG and PCI in multivessel CAD patients with CKD. We pooled the odds ratios with a fixed-effects model when I2 < 50% or a random-effects model when I2 > 75% and conducted heterogeneity and quality assessments as well as publication bias analyses. Results: A total of 17 studies with 62,343 patients were included. Compared with CABG, the pooled analysis showed that PCI had a lower risk of short-term all-cause death (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37–0.84) and cerebrovascular accidents (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53–0.79) but a higher risk of cardiac death (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.21–1.37), myocardial infarction (MI) (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.35–2.21), and repeat revascularization (RR) (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.99–5.09). There was no significant difference in the risk of long-term all-cause death (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.95–1.23) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.99–2.52) between the PCI and CABG groups. A subgroup analysis restricted to patients treated with dialysis or with PCI-drug-eluting stent yielded similar results. Conclusions: PCI for patients with CKD and multivessel disease (multivessel CAD) had advantages over CABG with regard to short-term all-cause death and cerebrovascular accidents, but disadvantages regarding the risk of myocardial death, MI, and RR; there was no significant difference in the risk of long-term all-cause death and MACCE. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Impact of Residual SYNTAX Score and Its Derived Indexes on Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Data from a Large Single Center

Background

Residual SYNTAX score (rSS) and its derived indexes including SYNTAX revascularization index (SRI) and clinical rSS had been developed to quantify and describe the extent of incomplete revascularization. This study was conducted to explore the utility of the three scores among real-world patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

From January 2013 to December 2013, patients underwent PCI treatment at Fuwai Hospital were included. The primary endpoints were all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. The secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction, revascularization, stroke, and stent thrombosis. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to determine the outcomes. Cox multivariable regression was to test the associations between scores and all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 10,344 patients were finally analyzed in this study. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that greater residual coronary lesions quantified by rSS and its derived indexes were associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. However, after multivariate analysis, only clinical rSS was an independent predictor of 2-year all-cause death (hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.03, P < 0.01). By receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, clinical rSS had superior predictability of 2-year all-cause death than rSS and SRI (area under ROC curve [AUC]: 0.59 vs. 0.56 vs. 0.56, all P < 0.01), whereas rSS was superior in predicting repeat revascularization than clinical rSS and SRI (AUC: 0.62 vs. 0.61 vs. 0.61; all P < 0.01). When comparing the predictive capability of rSS ≥8 with SRI <70%, their predictabilities were not significantly different.

Conclusions

This study indicates that all three indexes (rSS, clinical rSS, and SRI) are able to risk-stratify patients and predict 2-year outcomes after PCI. However, their prognostic capabilities are different.

Complex Recanalization of Chronic Total Occluison Supported by Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation in a Patient with an Aortic Valve Bioprothesis in Extraanatomic Position

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) still remains a major challenge in interventional cardiology. This case describes a complex PCI of the left main coronary artery and of a CTO of the right coronary artery using a minimal extracorporeal circulation system (MECC) in a patient with an aortic valve bioprothesis in extraanatomic position. It illustrates that complex recanalization strategies can be solved combining it with mechanical circulatory support technologies.

Impact of Incomplete Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Up to half of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention have multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) with conflicting data regarding optimal revascularization strategy in such patients. This paper assesses the evidence for complete revascularization (CR) versus incomplete revascularization in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, and its prognostic impact using meta‐analysis.

Methods and Results

A search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Current Contents Connect, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, Science Direct, and Web of Science was conducted to identify the association of CR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with major adverse cardiac events and mortality. Random‐effects meta‐analysis was used to estimate the odds of adverse outcomes. Meta‐regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship with continuous variables and outcomes. Thirty‐eight publications that included 156 240 patients were identified. Odds of death (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61‐0.78), repeat revascularization (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45‐0.80), myocardial infarction (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50‐0.81), and major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50‐0.79) were significantly lower in the patients who underwent CR. These outcomes were unchanged on subgroup analysis regardless of the definition of CR. Similar findings were recorded when CR was studied in the chronic total occlusion (CTO) subgroup (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53‐0.80). A meta‐regression analysis revealed a negative relationship between the OR for mortality and the percentage of CR.

Conclusion

CR is associated with reduced risk of mortality and major adverse cardiac events, irrespective of whether an anatomical or a score‐based definition of incomplete revascularization is used, and this magnitude of risk relates to degree of CR. These results have important implications for the interventional management of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated with drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

The clinical impact of completeness of revascularization on adverse cardiovascular events remains unclear among patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

This analysis included consecutive patients with multivessel CAD, who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) during the period from January 1, 2003, through to December 31, 2013. We compared the outcomes in patients, who achieved complete (CR) versus incomplete revascularization (IR) at the time of PCI. The primary outcome was death from any cause. Secondary outcomes were the rates of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeat revascularization. Propensity-score matching was used to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 3901 patients with multivessel CAD treated with DES, 1402 pairs of similar propensity scores in each group of CR and IR were identified. At a median follow-up of 4.9 years (interquartile range, 2.4-7.5), IR was associated with a similar risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.80-1.32; P=.83) as compared with CR. IR was also associated with similar risks of stroke (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.76-2.09; P=.37) and repeat revascularization (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.93-1.41; P=.19), but associated with a higher risk of MI (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.08-3.19; P=.024) compared to CR.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with multivessel CAD treated with DES, as compared with CR, IR was associated with similar risk of death. However, IR was associated with a higher risk of MI during follow-up.

The impact of residual coronary lesions on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: Residual SYNTAX score after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients from the Efficacy of Xience/Promus versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss after stENTing (EXCELLENT) registry

BACKGROUND

The SYNTAX score (SS) is used in preprocedural evaluation for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); it assesses the complexity of coronary lesions and predicts PCI outcome. However, the usefulness of the residual SS (rSS), which can be calculated after PCI and may reflect the completeness of revascularization, has not been fully investigated in an enriched PCI population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The baseline SS and rSS were determined in 5,088 patients (3,046 everolimus-eluting stents and 2,042 sirolimus-eluting stents) from the EXCELLENT registry. The primary end point was 1-year patient-oriented composite end point (POCE), comprising all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. The mean baseline SS was 13.6 ± 9.1 and rSS was 4.7 ± 6.5. Residual SS tertiles were defined as rSS = 0 (42.7%), 0 < rSS < 7 (29.9%), and rSS ≥ 7 (27.4%). Increasing rSS tertiles had increasing 1-year POCE rates (5.2%, 8.1%, 12.4%; P < .001) mainly caused by the increase in repeat revascularization. Also, rSS was an independent predictor of 1-year POCE after multivariate analysis (P for trend < .001) and had better predictability in simple coronary lesions (baseline SS < 16). The clinical rSS, calculated by multiplying the rSS to a modified age, creatinine clearance, and ejection fraction score (age/ejection fraction + 1 for each 10 mL the creatinine clearance <60 mL/min), was also associated with 1-year POCE, with predictability similar to rSS (area under curve 0.610 vs 0.607, P = .634).

CONCLUSION

Greater residual coronary lesions after PCI with "limus" drug-eluting stent, as quantified by the rSS and the clinical rSS, are associated with increased risk of adverse cardiac events.