Successful determination of nilotinib dosage by therapeutic drug monitoring in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia developing hepatic dysfunction: A case report

Varying concentrations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia patients following bariatric surgery: a case series

Bariatric surgery is increasingly performed to treat severe obesity. As a result of anatomical and physiological changes in the gastrointestinal tract, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral drugs can be altered, affecting their efficacy and safety. This includes the class of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) which are used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This case series describes the clinical course of four CML cases with a history of bariatric surgery. The patients used various TKIs (nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, ponatinib, and imatinib) for which 15 drug levels were measured. The measured TKI concentrations were in part subtherapeutic, and highly variable when compared to mean levels measured in the general population. Multiple drug levels were measured in these patients, as the clinicians were aware of the possible impact of bariatric surgery. The drug levels were used as additional input for clinical decision-making. All four patients required TKI switches and/or dose modifications to achieve an effective and tolerable treatment. Eventually, adequate clinical and molecular remissions were achieved in all cases. In summary, TKI concentrations of patients undergoing bariatric surgery may be subtherapeutic. Moreover, there is substantial interindividual and intraindividual variation, which may be explained by the complex interference of bariatric surgery and associated weight loss. For clinical practice, therapeutic drug monitoring is advised in patients with a history of bariatric surgery in case of suboptimal response or loss of response.

Life threatening hepatotoxicity induced by Nilotinib

INTRODUCTION

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor had changed the prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and the overall survival had reached 95%. Unfortunately, adverse events (AEs) remain an obstacle to following successful treatment in CML impairing the quality of life and sometimes endangering the lives of patients. To this end, we show this clinical case to discuss strategies to deal with rare AEs in a way to preserve the patient's life and to maintain not only a good response to treatment but also confidence and compliance of the patient.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a 57-year-old woman diagnosed with CML at the chronic phase who developed rare life-threatening hepatotoxicity (major cytolysis and prothrombin time fall) secondary to Nilotinib used as second-line treatment. This complication settled despite an optimal molecular response.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

We discuss below the follow-up and management in our center and according to the literature with more sophisticated pharmacological methods.

DISCUSSION

Although we used to monitor disease molecular response to treatment, we need solutions and manuscripts for monitoring drug dose parameters to avoid unusual dangerous effects risking the patient life. We conclude that monitoring the disease as well as the treatment pharmacokinetics is mandatory to better carry on CML patients.

Determination of Osimertinib, Aumolertinib, and Furmonertinib in Human Plasma for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by UPLC-MS/MS

The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib represent a new treatment option for patients with EGFR p.Thr790 Met (T790 M)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, there are no studies reporting the simultaneous quantification of these three drugs. A simple ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantitative determination of osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib concentrations in human plasma, and it was applied for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Plasma samples were processed using the protein precipitation method (acetonitrile). A positive ion monitoring mode was used for detecting analytes. D₃-Sorafenib was utilized as the internal standard (IS), and the mobile phases were acetonitrile (containing 0.1% formic acid) and water with gradient elution on an XSelect HSS XP column (2.1 mm × 100.0 mm, 2.5 µm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL·min⁻¹. The method’s selectivity, precision (coefficient of variation of intra-day and inter-day ≤ 6.1%), accuracy (95.8–105.2%), matrix effect (92.3–106.0%), extraction recovery, and stability results were acceptable according to the guidelines. The linear ranges were 5–500 ng·mL⁻¹, 2–500 ng·mL⁻¹, and 0.5–200 ng·mL⁻¹ for osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib, respectively. The results show that the method was sensitive, reliable, and simple and that it could be successfully applied to simultaneously determine the osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib blood concentrations in patients. These findings support using the method for TDM, potentially reducing the incidence of dosing blindness and adverse effects due to empirical dosing and inter-patient differences.

Successful determination of imatinib re-administration dosage by therapeutic drug monitoring in a case of chronic myeloid leukemia initiating dialysis for acute renal dysfunction

Fixed dose regimen is currently the standard administration method for TKI. However, this case report indicated that TDM may by a useful approach to individualized dosing of TKI for the treatment of CML when initiating dialysis.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs

PURPOSE

This review provides an overview of the current challenges in oral targeted antineoplastic drug (OAD) dosing and outlines the unexploited value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Factors influencing the pharmacokinetic exposure in OAD therapy are depicted together with an overview of different TDM approaches. Finally, current evidence for TDM for all approved OADs is reviewed.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search (covering literature published until April 2020), including primary and secondary scientific literature on pharmacokinetics and dose individualisation strategies for OADs, together with US FDA Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Reviews and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use European Public Assessment Reports was conducted.

RESULTS

OADs are highly potent drugs, which have substantially changed treatment options for cancer patients. Nevertheless, high pharmacokinetic variability and low treatment adherence are risk factors for treatment failure. TDM is a powerful tool to individualise drug dosing, ensure drug concentrations within the therapeutic window and increase treatment success rates. After reviewing the literature for 71 approved OADs, we show that exposure-response and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been established for the majority. Moreover, TDM has been proven to be feasible for individualised dosing of abiraterone, everolimus, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and tamoxifen in prospective studies. There is a lack of experience in how to best implement TDM as part of clinical routine in OAD cancer therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sub-therapeutic concentrations and severe adverse events are current challenges in OAD treatment, which can both be addressed by the application of TDM-guided dosing, ensuring concentrations within the therapeutic window.