Lipoprotein(a), interleukin-10, C-reactive protein, and 8-year outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention

Association between Lipoprotein(a) concentration and adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease: An observational cohort study

This prospective study investigated the association between lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels and adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease. Among 600 patients, 79.16 % were male. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed significantly higher incidence rates of cardiac death, major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction, revascularization and stroke in patients with elevated Lp(a) (≥30 mg/dL). The Cox Regression model identified Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL as a significant risk factor for adverse events (HR: 4.2920; 95%CI: 2.58-7.120; p < 0.05). Elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiac events in coronary artery disease patients undergoing PCI.

Lipoprotein(a) is a new prognostic factor in patients with psoriasis and coronary artery disease: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of lipoprotein (Lp) (a) in patients who have suffered from coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been fully studied, and the results are inconsistent. This study was conducted to evaluate whether increased Lp(a) concentrations cause differences in clinical adverse outcomes in patients with psoriasis who have already suffered from CAD.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with psoriasis and CAD between January 2017 and May 2022 in our hospital. The clinical records were collected, and comparisons were made between patients in the low Lp(a) and high Lp(a) groups. Cox proportional hazard analysis and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the association between variables.

RESULTS

Among 295 patients, 148 patients were in the low Lp(a) group, and 147 were in the high Lp(a) group. These two groups did not differ significantly in age, gender or body mass index. Compared with the low Lp(a) group, the levels of platelet counts (P = 0.038) and high sensitivity C reactive protein (P = 0.012) were higher in the high Lp(a) group. Patients in the high Lp(a) group had higher total cholesterol levels (P = 0.029) and lower triglyceride levels (P = 0.037). Among the whole cohort, clinical adverse events were not correlated with Lp(a) concentrations after a median follow-up of 3 years. However, in the subgroup analysis, there were significant differences in all-cause death (log rank P = 0.036) and rehospitalization (log rank P = 0.037) between the two groups in patients with diabetes; a difference in rehospitalization (log rank P = 0.042) was also found between the two groups in men.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with psoriasis and CAD, high levels of Lp(a) were related to a poor prognosis, especially in patients with diabetes and in men. These results will provide valuable information for the risk stratification of patients with psoriasis and CAD.

Lp(a), oxidized phospholipids and oxidation-specific epitopes are increased in subjects with keloid formation

BACKGROUND

Keloid formation following trauma or surgery is common among darkly pigmented individuals. Since lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been postulated to have a putative role in wound healing, and also mediates atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, it was assessed whether Lp(a), its associated oxidized phospholipids and other oxidation-specific biomarkers were associated with keloid formation.

METHODS

This case-control study included darkly pigmented individuals of African ancestry, 100 with keloid scarring and 100 non-keloid controls. The lipid panel, hsCRP, Lp(a), oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B-100 (OxPL-apoB), IgG and IgM apoB-immune complexes and IgG and IgM autoantibodies to a malondialdehyde mimotope (MDA-mimotope) were measured. Immunohistochemistry of keloid specimens was performed for both Lp(a) and OxPL staining.

RESULTS

Cases and controls were well matched for age, sex and lipid profile. Mean Lp(a) (57.8 vs. 44.2 mg/dL; P = 0.01, OxPL-apoB 17.4 vs. 15.7 nmol/L; P = 0.009) and IgG and IgM apoB-immune complexes and IgG and IgM MDA-mimotope levels were significantly higher in keloid cases. Keloid tissue stained strongly for OxPL.

CONCLUSION

Darkly pigmented individuals of African ancestry with keloids have higher plasma levels of Lp(a), OxPL-apoB and oxidation-specific epitopes. The commonality of excessive wound healing in keloids and chronic complications from coronary revascularization suggests avenues of investigation to define a common mechanism driven by Lp(a) and the innate response to oxidized lipids.

Impact of Lipoprotein(a) concentrations on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A large cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Till now, the prognostic value of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. We therefore conducted this study to evaluate the effect of Lp(a) levels on clinical outcomes in this population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 10,059 CAD patients who underwent PCI were prospectively enrolled in this cohort study, of which 6564 patients had Lp(a) ≤30 mg/dl and 3495 patients had Lp(a) > 30 mg/dl. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke or unplanned revascularization. Multivariate Cox regression analysis and propensity-score matching analysis were performed. After propensity-score matching, 3449 pairs of patients were identified, and post-matching absolute standardized differences were <10% for all the covariates. At 2.4 years, the risk of MACCE was significantly higher in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels than those with normal Lp(a) levels in both overall population (13.0% vs. 11.4%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.142, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.009-1.293; P = 0.040) and propensity-matched cohorts (13.0% vs. 11.2%; HR 1.167, 95%CI 1.019-1.337; P = 0.026). Of note, the predictive value of Lp(a) levels on MACCE tended to be more evident in individuals >65 years or those with left main and/or three-vessel disease. On the contrary, elevated Lp(a) levels had almost no effect on clinical outcomes in patients ≤65 years (P _interaction = 0.021) as well as those who had one- or two-vessel coronary artery disease (P _interaction = 0.086).

CONCLUSION

In CAD patients who underwent PCI, elevated Lp(a) levels were positively related to higher risk of MACCE at 2.4-year follow-up, especially in patients >65 years and those with left main and/or three-vessel disease.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

not applicable.

Impact of Lipoprotein(a) as a Residual Risk Factor in Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With Statins

The association between lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels and cardiovascular disease has been reported. However, it is still uncertain whether Lp(a) concentration could be a residual risk factor for cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of the present study is to evaluate the impact of Lp(a) on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ACS treated with statins. We studied 1,758 consecutive patients with ACS who underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention between 2008 and 2017. We finally enrolled 1,131 patients for whom Lp(a) data were available and who were treated with statins at discharge. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to Lp(a) levels (median Lp(a) 15.0 mg/100 ml). The primary end points were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), composite of all-cause death, and myocardial infarction up to 5 years. Overall, 107 MACEs (9.5%) were identified. The cumulative incidence of MACE was significantly higher in the high Lp(a) group than the low Lp(a) group (log-rank p = 0.01). After adjustment for other cardiovascular risk factors, the high Lp(a) group had a significantly higher risk of MACE (hazard ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.61, p = 0.03). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis also showed that increasing Lp(a) as a continuous variable was associated with the incidence of MACE (hazard ratio 1.35 per log Lp[a] 1 increase, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.72, p = 0.01). In conclusion, high Lp(a) level is significantly associated with long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ACS treated with statins after primary percutaneous coronary intervention and is likely to be a potential biomarker for residual risk prediction of future clinical events.

Lipoprotein(a)—The Crossroads of Atherosclerosis, Atherothrombosis and Inflammation

Increased lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels are an independent predictor of coronary artery disease (CAD), degenerative aortic stenosis (DAS), and heart failure independent of CAD and DAS. Lp(a) levels are genetically determinated in an autosomal dominant mode, with great intra- and inter-ethnic diversity. Most variations in Lp(a) levels arise from genetic variations of the gene that encodes the apolipoprotein(a) component of Lp(a), the LPA gene. LPA is located on the long arm of chromosome 6, within region 6q2.6–2.7. Lp(a) levels increase cardiovascular risk through several unrelated mechanisms. Lp(a) quantitatively carries all of the atherogenic risk of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, although it is even more prone to oxidation and penetration through endothelia to promote the production of foam cells. The thrombogenic properties of Lp(a) result from the homology between apolipoprotein(a) and plasminogen, which compete for the same binding sites on endothelial cells to inhibit fibrinolysis and promote intravascular thrombosis. LPA has up to 70% homology with the human plasminogen gene. Oxidized phospholipids promote differentiation of pro-inflammatory macrophages that secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines (e. g., interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α). The aim of this review is to define which of these mechanisms of Lp(a) is predominant in different groups of patients.

Liver Fibrosis Scoring Systems as Novel Tools for Predicting Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Following Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background

Previous studies have suggested a strong association of liver fibrosis scores (LFSs) with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with different cardiovascular diseases. Nonetheless, it is basically blank regarding the prognostic significance of LFSs in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study sought to examine the potential role of LFSs in predicting long‐term outcomes in a large cohort of patients with stable coronary artery disease after elective PCI.

Methods and Results

In this multicenter, prospective study, we consecutively enrolled 4003 patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing PCI. Eight currently available noninvasive LFSs were assessed for each subject. All patients were followed up for the occurrence of cardiovascular events including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. During an average follow‐up of 5.0±1.6 years, 315 (7.87%) major cardiovascular events were recorded. Subjects who developed cardiovascular events were more likely to have intermediate or high LFSs, including nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score; fibrosis‐4 score; body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, diabetes mellitus score (BARD); and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio. Furthermore, compared with subjects with low scores, those with intermediate plus high score levels had significantly increased risk of cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratios ranging 1.57–1.92). Moreover, the addition of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score; fibrosis‐4 score; or body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, diabetes mellitus score into a model with established cardiovascular risk factors significantly improved the prediction ability.

Conclusions

High LFSs levels might be useful for predicting adverse prognosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease following PCI, suggesting the possibility of the application of LFSs in the risk stratification before elective PCI.

Predicting Cardiovascular Outcomes by Baseline Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations: A Large Cohort and Long-Term Follow-up Study on Real-World Patients Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background

Although several studies have indicated that lipoprotein(a) is a useful prognostic predictor for patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), previous observations have somewhat been limited by either small sample size or short‐term follow‐up. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of lipoprotein(a) on long‐term outcomes in a large cohort of stable coronary artery disease patients after PCI.

Methods and Results

In this multicenter and prospective study, we consecutively enrolled 4078 stable coronary artery disease patients undergoing PCI from March 2011 to March 2016. They were categorized according to both the median of lipoprotein(a) levels and lipoprotein(a) values of <15 (low), 15 to 30 (medium), and ≥30 mg/dL (high). All patients were followed up for occurrence of cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. During an average of 4.9 years of follow‐up, 315 (7.7%) cardiovascular events occurred. The events group had significantly higher lipoprotein(a) levels than the nonevents group. Compared with the low lipoprotein(a) group, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the high lipoprotein(a) group had a significantly lower cumulative event‐free survival rate, and multivariate Cox regression analysis further revealed that the high lipoprotein(a) group had significantly increased cardiovascular events risk. Moreover, adding continuous or categorical lipoprotein(a) to the Cox model led to a significant improvement in C‐statistic, net reclassification, and integrated discrimination.

Conclusions

With a large sample size and long‐term follow‐up, our data confirmed that high lipoprotein(a) levels could be associated with a poor prognosis after PCI in stable coronary artery disease patients, suggesting that lipoprotein(a) measurements may be useful for patient risk stratification before selective PCI.

Prognostic value of lipoprotein (a) level in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis

Background

Elevated lipoprotein (a) is recognized as a risk factor for incident cardiovascular events in the general population and established cardiovascular disease patients. However, there are conflicting findings on the prognostic utility of elevated lipoprotein (a) level in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of elevated lipoprotein (a) level in CAD patients.

Methods and results

A systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted until April 16, 2019. Observational studies reporting the prognostic value of elevated lipoprotein (a) level for cardiac events (cardiac death and acute coronary syndrome), cardiovascular events (death, stroke, acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularisation), cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality in CAD patients were included. Pooled multivariable adjusted risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the highest vs. the lowest lipoprotein (a) level were utilized to calculate the prognostic value. Seventeen studies enrolling 283,328 patients were identified. Meta-analysis indicated that elevated lipoprotein (a) level was independently associated with an increased risk of cardiac events (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.31–2.42) and cardiovascular events (RR 1.29; 95% CI 1.17–1.42) in CAD patients. However, elevated lipoprotein (a) level was not significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.43; 95% CI 0.94–2.18) and all-cause mortality (RR 1.35; 95% CI 0.93–1.95).

Conclusions

Elevated lipoprotein (a) level is an independent predictor of cardiac and cardiovascular events in CAD patients. Measurement of lipoprotein (a) level has potential to improve the risk stratification among patients with CAD.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12944-019-1092-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The pleiotropic association between IL-10 levels and CVD prognosis: Evidence from a meta-analysis

We examined the precise association between IL-10 levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prognosis and explored the pleiotropic role of IL-10 in different cardiac pathologies. We performed a meta-analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies investigating IL-10 levels. Meta-regression analyses were used to determine the cause of the discrepancies. To assess publication bias, funnel plots were constructed, and Egger's tests were performed. Data from the GSE58015 dataset were used to investigate the levels of IL-10 under certain conditions. Because of substantial heterogeneity in the data used to compare the IL-10 levels between patients with CVD and healthy people, we could not determine the differences between the healthy controls and patients with ischemic or nonischemic pathologies (p > 0.05). The analysis of the association between IL-10 levels and CVD prognosis indicated that higher IL-10 levels were significantly associated with a poor prognosis in patients with nonischemic pathologies (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.00-1.20, p = 0.043) but differentially associated with the prognosis of patients with ischemic pathologies based on the sampling time point (before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): HR = 4.90, 95% CI = 1.24-19.30, p < 0.001; after PCI: HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.43-0.75, p = 0.023). The meta-regression analysis showed that the pooled HR of the IL-10 levels was positively correlated with the IL-10/IL-6 ratio (β = 0.644, p = 0.024). The funnel plots and Egger's tests revealed no statistically significant bias in our meta-analysis (p > 0.1). Furthermore, our data mining analysis supported our findings. Our analysis showed that IL-10 levels may be pleiotropically associated with the CVD prognosis possibly based on the type of pathology, disease stage and levels of other proinflammatory factors, such as IL-6.

Association between proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and late saphenous vein graft disease after coronary artery bypass grafting: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to explore the association between serum proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) level and saphenous vein grafts disease (SVGD) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A secondary hospital in Tianjin City, China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 231 participants were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥18 years, previous CABG surgery at least 12 months ago, at least one SVG for bypass during CABG, abnormal non-invasive test results or recurrent stable angina pectoris by coronary angiography indications, and willing to participate and sign informed consent. Participants with any of the following were excluded from the study: congenital valvular disease, decompensated heart failure, anaemia defined as a haemoglobin level of <12 g/dL in women or <13 g/dL in men, malignant neoplasms, renal failure, severe hepatic disease, thyroid disease, acute or chronic inflammatory disease and chronic obstructive lung disease.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

SVGD was defined as at least one SVG with significant stenosis (≥50%). Circulating PCSK9 levels were measured using commercial ELISA kits according to the manufacturer's instructions.

RESULTS

The mean PCSK9 level in the SVGD group was significantly higher than that in the patent group (275.2±38.6 vs 249.3±37.7, p<0.01). The multivariate logistic regression model revealed a significant association between serum PCSK9 and SVGD (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.46-2.95) per 1 SD increase in serum PCSK9.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is the first to identify an independent association between PCSK9 and late SVGD after adjustment for established cardiovascular risk factors. A multicentre prospective cohort study with large sample size should be conducted in the future to further research this relationship.

Plasma Lipoprotein(a) Concentration Is Associated With the Coronary Severity but Not With Events in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Chinese Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Although lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) has been regarded as an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), its predictive role in outcomes in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) has been undetermined. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relations of Lp(a) to the coronary severity and events in Chinese patients with angiography-proven stable CAD.

METHODS

A total of 3,278 patients with stable CAD were consecutively enrolled and the coronary severity was evaluated by the Gensini Score (GS) system. Patients were divided into two groups according to the median of GS: high GS group (n=1,585) and low GS group (n=1,693). The associations of continuous Lp(a), Lp(a) ≥300mg/L, and tertiles of Lp(a) with GS and events were respectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients in the high GS group had significantly higher concentrations of Lp(a). In addition, the multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that elevated Lp(a) (odds ratio: 1.164, 95% confidence interval: 1.005-1.349), Lp(a) ≥300mg/L (odds ratio: 1.200, 95% confidence interval: 1.028-1.401), and the highest tertile of Lp(a) (odds ratio: 1.205, 95% confidence interval: 1.010-1.438) were statistically associated with GS after adjusted for potential confounders. However, although 215 (6.56%) events were established during a median of follow-up over 10,170 patient-years, no relationship between Lp(a) and events was found.

CONCLUSIONS

In this Chinese cohort study on stable CAD with moderate sample size and follow-up duration, data showed that Lp(a) was significantly associated with the coronary severity while not with cardiovascular events, similar to several studies, suggesting that further study is needed regarding the role of Lp(a) in ASCVD.

The association of lipoprotein(a) with incident heart failure hospitalization: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a proatherogenic lipoprotein associated with coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, and more recently aortic stenosis and heart failure (HF). We examined the association of Lp(a) levels with incident HF hospitalization in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. We also assessed the relationship between Lp(a) levels and arterial stiffness as a potential mechanism for development of HF.

METHODS

Lp(a) was measured in 14,154 ARIC participants without prevalent HF at ARIC visit 1 (1987-1989). The association of Lp(a) quintiles with incident HF hospitalization was assessed using Cox proportional-hazards models. Arterial stiffness parameters were stratified based on Lp(a) quintiles, and p-trend was calculated across ordered groups.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 23.4 years, there were 2605 incident HF hospitalizations. Lp(a) levels were directly associated with incident HF hospitalization in models adjusted for age, race, gender, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, diabetes, smoking status, body mass index, heart rate, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (quintile 5 vs. quintile 1: hazard ratio [HR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.41; p-trend across increasing quintiles <0.01), but not after excluding prevalent and incident myocardial infarction cases (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.91-1.27; p-trend = 0.70). When adjusted for age, gender, and race, Lp(a) quintiles were not significantly associated with arterial stiffness parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased Lp(a) levels were associated with increased risk of incident HF hospitalization. After excluding prevalent and incident myocardial infarction, the association was no longer significant. Lp(a) levels were not associated with arterial stiffness parameters.

Association of lipoprotein(a) with long-term mortality following coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

There is no consistent evidence to suggest the association of plasma lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) with long-term mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

HYPOTHESIS

Level of Lp(a) is associated with long-term mortality following CAG or PCI.

METHODS

We enrolled 1684 patients with plasma Lp(a) data undergoing CAG or PCI between April 2009 and December 2013. The patients were divided into 2 groups: a low-Lp(a) group (Lp[a] <16.0 mg/dL; n = 842) and a high-Lp(a) group (Lp[a] ≥16.0 mg/dL; n = 842).

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the high and low Lp(a) groups (0.8% vs 0.5%, respectively; P = 0.364). During the median follow-up period of 1.95 years, the high-Lp(a) group had a higher long-term mortality than did the low-Lp(a) group (5.8% vs 2.5%, respectively; P = 0.003). After adjustment of confounders, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a higher Lp(a) level was an independent predictor of long-term mortality (hazard ratio: 1.96, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-3.59, P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggested that an elevated Lp(a) level was significantly associated with long-term mortality following CAG or PCI. However, additional larger multicenter studies will be required to investigate the predictive value of Lp(a) levels and evaluate the benefit of controlling Lp(a) levels for patients undergoing CAG or PCI.

Impact of Lipoprotein (a) on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Treated with Statin After a First Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

AIMS

Cardiovascular risk persists despite intensive lipid lowering therapy using statins. Serum levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] can be a residual cardiovascular risk for adverse events. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of Lp(a) on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with statin after percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 3507 consecutive CAD patients who underwent a first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1997 and 2011 at our institution. We identified 1768 patients (50.4%) who had treated with statin during PCI. Eligible 1336 patients were stratified to two groups according to Lp(a) levels (median Lp (a) 21.5 mg/dL). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiac death and non-fatal acute coronary syndrome.

RESULTS

MACE occurred 144 (10.8%) including 34 (2.5%) cardiac death and 110 (8.7%) non-fatal ACS during median follow-up period of 1920 days. The cumulative rate of MACE was significantly higher in group with high Lp(a) group (log-rank p=0.0460). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a significant correlation between Lp (a) levels treated as a natural logarithm-transformed continuous variable and increased MACE (adjusted HR for MACE 1.28, 95%CI 1.04-1.58, p=0.0184)Conclusion: Elevated levels of Lp(a) is significantly associated with long-term adverse clinical outcomes among CAD patients who received statin therapy after PCI.

Cohort profile of BIOMArCS: the BIOMarker study to identify the Acute risk of a Coronary Syndrome-a prospective multicentre biomarker study conducted in the Netherlands

PURPOSE

Progression of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) towards acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a dynamic and heterogeneous process with many intertwined constituents, in which a plaque destabilising sequence could lead to ACS within short time frames. Current CAD risk assessment models, however, are not designed to identify increased vulnerability for the occurrence of coronary events within a precise, short time frame at the individual patient level. The BIOMarker study to identify the Acute risk of a Coronary Syndrome (BIOMArCS) was designed to evaluate whether repeated measurements of multiple biomarkers can predict such 'vulnerable periods'.

PARTICIPANTS

BIOMArCS is a multicentre, prospective, observational study of 844 patients presenting with ACS, either with or without ST-elevation and at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We hypothesised that patterns of circulating biomarkers that reflect the various pathophysiological components of CAD, such as distorted lipid metabolism, vascular inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, increased thrombogenicity and ischaemia, diverge in the days to weeks before a coronary event. Divergent biomarker patterns, identified by serial biomarker measurements during 1-year follow-up might then indicate 'vulnerable periods' during which patients with CAD are at high short-term risk of developing an ACS. Venepuncture was performed every fortnight during the first half-year and monthly thereafter. As prespecified, patient enrolment was terminated after the primary end point of cardiovascular death or hospital admission for non-fatal ACS had occurred in 50 patients. A case-cohort design will explore differences in temporal patterns of circulating biomarkers prior to the repeat ACS.

FUTURE PLANS AND DISSEMINATION

Follow-up and event adjudication have been completed. Prespecified biomarker analyses are currently being performed and dissemination through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations is expected from the third quarter of 2016. Should identification of a 'vulnerable period' prove to be feasible, then future research could focus on event reduction through pharmacological or mechanical intervention during such periods of high risk for ACS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR1698 and NTR1106.

Impact of Lipoprotein(a) on Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at twofold to fourfold higher cardiovascular risk than those without DM. Serum levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) can be risk factors for adverse events. However, the clinical implications of Lp(a) in patients with DM who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. The aim of the study was to determine the role of Lp(a) in patients with DM who underwent PCI. A total of 3,508 patients were treated by PCI from 1997 to 2011 at our institution. Among them, we analyzed consecutive 1,546 patients with DM. Eligible 1,136 patients were divided into 2 groups (high Lp(a) [n = 575] and low Lp(a) [n = 561]) by the median of Lp(a) levels. The number of chronic kidney disease, multivessel disease, and the level of LDL-C were higher in the group with high Lp(a) than with low Lp(a). The median follow-up period was 4.7 years. Event rate of all-cause death was same between the 2 groups (p = 0.37). However, cumulative incidence of cardiac death and acute coronary syndrome was significantly higher in the high Lp(a) than in the low Lp(a) group (p = 0.03). Multivariable analysis selected a high Lp(a) level as an independent predictor of cardiac death and acute coronary syndrome (hazard ratio 1.20; 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.42; p = 0.04). In conclusion, a high Lp(a) value could be associated with advanced cardiac events after PCI for patients with DM.

Evaluation of Early Atherosclerosis Markers in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate relationships between early atherosclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using laboratory, functional, and morphological markers of atherosclerosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the present prospective single-center study, 96 patients with IBD (58 patients with ulcerative colitis and 36 patients with Crohn's disease) and 65 healthy control subjects were included. The demographic data of each patient and control subject were recorded. The patients with IBD and healthy controls were compared in terms of the carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), the values of flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and nitroglycerine-mediated dilatation (NMD), and the levels of von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF-Ag), D-dimer, and lipoprotein (a). RESULTS There were no significant differences between the IBD patients and controls in terms of age, sex, BMI, systolic and diastolic BPs, serum levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, or triglycerides. IBD patients had significantly higher levels of VWF-Ag (156.6±58.9 vs. 104.2±43.3, P<0.001) and D-dimer (337.2±710.8 vs. 175.9±110.9, P<0.001) as compared to the controls. No significant differences were determined between the 2 groups in terms of FMD and NMD values. Although statistically not significant, the CIMT values were higher in the IBD patients than in the controls (0.517±0.141 mm vs. 0.467±0.099 mm, P=0.073). In the correlation analysis, the CIMT was found to be correlated negatively with FMD and positively with high sensitive C-reactive protein, VWF-Ag, and D-dimer. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that VWF-Ag and D-dimer can be beneficial early atherosclerosis markers in IBD patients.

The relationship between Lp(a) and CVD outcomes: a systematic review

Robust associations between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and CVD outcomes among general populations have been published in previous studies. However, associations in high risk primary prevention and secondary prevention populations are less well defined. In order to investigate this further, a systematic review was performed including prospective studies, which assessed the relationship between Lp(a) and CVD outcomes using multivariable analyses. Additional information was gathered on Lp(a) assays, multivariable modelling and population characteristics. Literature searches from inception up to December 2015 retrieved 2850 records. From these 60 studies were included. Across 39 primary prevention studies in the general population (hazard ratios ranged from 1.16 to 2.97) and seven high risk primary prevention studies (hazard ratios ranged from 1.01 to 3.7), there was evidence of a statistically significant relationship between increased Lp(a) and an increased risk of future CVD. Results in 14 studies of secondary prevention populations were also suggestive of a modest statistically significant relationship (hazard ratios ranged from 0.75 to 3.7).Therefore current evidence would suggest that increased Lp(a) levels are associated with modest increases in the risk of future CVD events in both general and higher risk populations. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Impact of high lipoprotein(a) levels on in-stent restenosis and long-term clinical outcomes of angina pectoris patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in Asian population

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is known to be associated with cardiovascular complications and atherothrombotic properties in general populations. However, it has not been examined whether Lp(a) levels are able to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). A total of 595 consecutive patients with angina pectoris who underwent elective PCI with DES were enrolled from 2004 to 2010. The patients were divided into two groups according to the levels of Lp(a): Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL (n = 485 patients), and Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL (n = 111 patients). The 6-9-month angiographic outcomes and 3-year cumulative major clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Binary restenosis occurred in 26 of 133 lesions (19.8%) in the high Lp(a) group and 43 of 550 lesions (7.9%) in the low Lp(a) group (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the reference vessel diameter, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, total lesion length, and Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL were predictors of binary restenosis. In the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL was significantly associated with the 3-year adverse clinical outcomes including any myocardial infarction, revascularization (target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR)), TLR-major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), TVR-MACE, and All-MACEs. In our study, high Lp(a) level ≥ 50 mg/dL in angina pectoris patients undergoing elective PCI with DES was significantly associated with binary restenosis and 3-year adverse clinical outcomes in an Asian population.

Plasma lipoprotein(a) predicts major cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease. The predictive power of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease is diminished in patients with CKD. The serum level of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] can be a risk factor for adverse events, but the clinical implications of Lp(a) in patients with CKD who have been treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain uncertain. We aimed to determine the role of Lp(a) on long-term outcomes in patients with CKD after PCI.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 904 patients with CKD among 3508 patients who underwent a first PCI between 1997 and 2011 at our institution. We divided patients into 2 groups [high (n=454) or low (n=450)] according to median levels of Lp(a). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar and the median follow-up period was 4.7 years. Cumulative event-free survival was significantly worse for the group with high, than low Lp(a) (P=0.01). Multivariable analysis indicated a high Lp(a) level as an independent predictor of primary outcomes (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.82; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

A high Lp(a) value is associated with a poor prognosis after PCI for patients with CKD.

Pleiotropic effects of fenofibrate therapy on rats with hypertriglycemia

Background

Cardio-protective effect of fibrate therapy is controversial and current research is to evaluate the effect of fenofibrate therapy on rats with hypertriglycemia.

Methods

Rats with hypertriglycemia were produced by 10% fructose administration (10 ml daily) for 4 weeks. After model has been successfully produced as reflected by increased triglyceride level, different doses of fenofibrate, namely low dose (50 mg/kg body weight) and high dose (100 mg/kg body weight), were orally prescribed for 2 weeks. At baseline, 4 weeks of fructose administration and 2 weeks of fenofibrate therapy, parameters of interest were evaluated and compared.

Results

At baseline, no significant differences of parameter were observed between groups. After 4 weeks of fructose prescription, triglyceride level increased in company with high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apoprotein A1 (ApoA1) decreased. C-reactive protein (CRP) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were also elevated. Endothelial function was impaired as reflected by reduced nitric oxide (NO) production and elevated serum asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) level. All these changes were significant as compared to the control group (P < 0.05), suggesting that short-term of triglyceride elevation could potently initiate atherosclerosis. With 2 weeks of fenofibrate therapy, in comparison to un-treated group, triglyceride level was significantly reduced in parallel with HDL-C and ApoA1 elevation. Inflammation and oxidation were also profoundly ameliorated as reflected by CRP and MDA reduction. Notably, NO production was enhanced in company with serum ADMA level decrease. Overall, these improvements manifested in a dose-dependent manner, which was supported by multivariate regression analysis showing that after adjusted to other variables, the dose of fenofibrate therapy remained significantly associated with NO production and serum ADMA level, with OR of 1.042 (high-dose versus low-dose, 95% CI 1.028-1.055, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Fenofibrate therapy not only could reduce triglyceride level but also confer pleiotropic effects in terms of endothelium-protection and amelioration of inflammation and oxidation in a dose-dependent manner.

Impact of lipoprotein(a) as residual risk on long-term outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

Cardiovascular risk remains uncertain in patients with cardiovascular disease despite achieving target lipid levels. Serum levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] can be risk factors for adverse events. The aim of this study was to determine the role of Lp(a) as a residual risk factor in patients who achieve target lipid levels by the time of treatment by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 3,508 patients were treated by PCI from 1997 to 2011 at our institution. Among them, we analyzed consecutive 569 patients who achieved target lipid levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dl, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥40 mg/dl, and triglycerides <150 mg/dl at PCI. A total of 411 eligible patients were assigned to groups according to Lp(a) levels of ≥30 mg/dl (high Lp(a); n = 119) or <30 mg/dl (low Lp(a); n = 292). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and acute coronary syndrome. The median follow-up period was 4.7 years. Cumulative event-free survival was significantly worse for the group with high Lp(a) than with low Lp(a) group (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis selected a high Lp(a) level as an independent predictor of primary outcomes (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.70, p = 0.04). In conclusion, a high Lp(a) value (≥30 mg/dl) could be associated with a poor prognosis after PCI even for patients who achieved target lipid levels.

Lipoprotein(a): an important cardiovascular risk factor and a clinical conundrum

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) are an emerging risk factor for the development of coronary heart disease (CHD). Recent genetic and epidemiologic data have provided strong evidence for a causal role of Lp(a) in CHD. Despite these developments, which have attracted increasing interest from clinicians and basic scientists, many unanswered questions persist. The true pathogenic mechanism of Lp(a) remains a mystery. Significant uncertainty exists concerning the appropriate use of Lp(a) in the clinical setting. No therapeutic intervention remains that can specifically lower plasma Lp(a) concentrations, although the list of compounds that lower Lp(a) and LDL continues to expand.

Lipoprotein(a): a promising marker for residual cardiovascular risk assessment

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are still the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, although optimal medical therapy has been prescribed for primary and secondary preventions. Residual cardiovascular risk for some population groups is still considerably high although target low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level has been achieved. During the past few decades, compelling pieces of evidence from clinical trials and meta-analyses consistently illustrate that lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a significant risk factor for atherosclerosis and CVD due to its proatherogenic and prothrombotic features. However, the lack of effective medication for Lp(a) reduction significantly hampers randomized, prospective, and controlled trials conducting. Based on previous findings, for patients with LDL-C in normal range, Lp(a) may be a useful marker for identifying and evaluating the residual cardiovascular risk, and aggressively lowering LDL-C level than current guidelines' recommendation may be reasonable for patients with particularly high Lp(a) level.

Plasma urokinase antigen and C-reactive protein predict angina recurrence after coronary angioplasty

This study evaluates the predictive value of several biochemical indices of the coagulation-fibrinolysis system, platelet function, and inflammatory state for angina recurrence after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). We measured preprocedural and follow-up plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, and urokinase plasminogen activator antigen (uPA), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity, tissue plasminogen activator activity, and adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation in 53 patients with chronic stable angina who underwent successful elective PTCA of single hemodynamically significant lesions in coronary arteries. All patients were followed up for 12 months after PTCA. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of variables with angina recurrence rate. At the end of the follow-up, 16 patients had angina recurrence. Among 36 clinical, biochemical, and angiographic variables, the duration of stable angina more than 12 months before PTCA (χ (2) = 5.73; P = 0.02, hazard ratio (HR) 3.7, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.26-10.6), high baseline levels of CRP (>7 mg/l) (χ (2) = 8.34; P = 0.004, HR 2.9, 95 % CI 1.4-5.9), uPA antigen baseline (>1 ng/ml) (χ (2) = 17.11; P = 0.0001, HR 11.5, 95 % CI 3.6-36.7) and 48 h after PTCA (χ (2) = 15.73; P = 0.0001, HR 8.8, 95 % CI 3.01-25.96), baseline PAI-1 activity (>18 IU/ml) (χ (2) = 9.37; P = 0.002, HR 7.6, 95 % CI 2.07-27.84) were significant predictors of recurrent angina by univariate analyses. According to stepwise multivariate analyses, only the levels of plasma uPA antigen and serum CRP were shown to be significant independent predictors of angina recurrence (multivariate uPA χ (2) = 8.22, P = 0.004, HR 6.2, 95 % CI 1.78-21.67; CRP χ (2) = 4.09, P = 0.04, HR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.02-3.68). High preprocedural plasma uPA and serum CRP levels are indicative of angina recurrence after successful PTCA, and are valuable for the prognosis of restenosis.

Lack of association between lipoprotein(a) genetic variants and subsequent cardiovascular events in Chinese Han patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels predict cardiovascular events incidence in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Genetic variants in the rs3798220, rs10455872 and rs6415084 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Lp(a) gene (LPA) correlate with elevated Lp(a) levels, but whether these SNPs have prognostic value for CAD patients is unknown. The present study evaluated the association of LPA SNPs with incidence of subsequent cardiovascular events in CAD patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

TaqMan SNP genotyping assays were performed to detect the rs6415084, rs3798220 and rs10455872 genotypes in 517 Chinese Han patients with CAD after PCI. We later assessed whether there was an association of these SNPs with incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke and coronary revascularization). Serum lipid profiles were also determined using biochemical methods.

RESULTS

Only the rs6415084 variant allele was associated with higher Lp(a) levels [41.3 (20.8, 74.6) vs. 18.6 (10.3, 40.9) mg/dl, p < 0.001]. During a 2-year follow-up period, 102 patients suffered MACE, and Cox regression analysis demonstrated that elevated Lp(a) (≥30 mg/dl) levels correlated with increased MACE (adjusted HR, 1.69; 95% CI 1.13-2.53), but there was no association between LPA genetic variants (rs6415084 and rs3798220) and MACE incidence (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data did not support a relationship between genetic LPA variants (rs6415084 and rs3798220) and subsequent cardiovascular events after PCI in Chinese Han CAD patients.