Vulvar melanoma: is there a role for sentinel lymph node biopsy?

Value of surgical lymph node assessment for patients with vulvar melanoma

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the utilization and outcomes of lymphadenectomy/ sampling (LND) for patients with vulvar melanoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed between 2004-2015 with vulvar melanoma with known depth of tumor invasion and no distant metastases were identified in the National Cancer Database. Based on pathology report patients who underwent inguinal lymph node sampling/dissection were identified. Clinico-pathological characteristics and overall survival were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1286 patients were identified; 62.8 % (n = 808) underwent lymphadenectomy/ sampling. Patients who underwent lymphadenectomy/ sampling were younger (median 66 vs 76 years, p < 0.001), more likely to have private insurance (42.9 % vs 27.8 %, p < 0.001), present with tumor ulceration (65.9 % vs 58.6 %, p = 0.01), have deeper tumor invasion (p < 0.001) and undergo radical vulvectomy (26.4 % vs 12.1 %, p < 0.001). Patients who underwent lymphadenectomy/ sampling had better overall survival compared to those who did not (median 49.08 vs 35.91 months respectively, p < 0.001). After controlling for patient age, race, insurance status, comorbidities, presence of tumor ulceration and Breslow depth of invasion performance of lymphadenectomy/ sampling was associated with better survival (hazard ratio: 0.78, 95 % confidence intervals: 0.67, 0.92).

CONCLUSION

For patients with vulvar melanoma with at least 1 mm invasion lymphadenectomy/ sampling was associated with better overall survival likely secondary to stage migration.

Innovations in Rare Gynecologic Cancer: Melanoma, Neuroendocrine, and Low-Grade Serous Ovarian

In the field of gynecologic cancer, low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) has been poorly understood and underinvestigated until recently. Similarly, understanding of the distinct properties and therapeutic sensitivities of gynecologic melanoma and cervical neuroendocrine tumors has recently accelerated. For each of these rare cancers, we explore the epidemiology and natural history, discuss the prognosis, diagnostic testing, and contemporary molecular classification, and then deliberate existing and emerging therapeutic strategies. In LGSOC, we focus on the clinical relevance of recent molecular studies that shed light on the importance of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway gene mutation and chromosome 1 copy-number change on prognosis and MEK inhibitor sensitivity. We also discuss the relative chemoresistance of this disease and the fact that attention is shifting to combinations of molecular therapies such as endocrine agents plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors or MEK inhibitors plus FAK inhibitors. Gynecologic tract melanomas harbor a lower frequency of canonical BRAF mutations, and have lower tumor mutational burden and immune cell infiltration than cutaneous melanomas (CMs). As a result, patients with this disease are less likely to respond to BRAF/MEK or immune checkpoint inhibition than patients with CM. Emerging strategies include the combination of antiangiogenic agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the use of adoptive cellular therapies. In cervical neuroendocrine cancer, we discuss the use of surgery in early-stage disease, and the uncertainties regarding the role of radiotherapy. We also explore the evidence for chemotherapy and emerging investigational strategies including the use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. For all situations, we explore the shared decision-making process with the patient.

Should video laryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy be used for adults undergoing endotracheal intubation in the pre-hospital setting? A critical appraisal of a systematic review

The safety and utility of endotracheal intubation by paramedics in the United Kingdom is a matter of debate. Considering the controversy surrounding the safety of paramedic-performed endotracheal intubation, any interventions that enhance patient safety should be evaluated for implementation based on solid evidence of their effectiveness. A systematic review performed by Hansel and colleagues (2022) sought to assess compare video laryngoscopes against direct laryngoscopes in clinical practice. This commentary aims to critically appraise the methods used within the review by Hansel et al (2022) and expand upon the findings in the context of clinical practice.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in vulvar melanoma: the first multicenter study and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This multicenter study aimed to investigate the role of preoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy (SNB) as well as the impact of negative SNB on loco-regional control and survival in vulvar melanoma patients with clinically negative nodes (cN0).

METHODS

Patients who had a proven vulvar melanoma with a Breslow thickness of 1-4 mm, cN0 and underwent a preoperative lymphatic mapping followed by SNB between July 2013 and March 2021 were retrospectively included. Groin recurrence and mortality rate were calculated as absolute and relative frequency. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. We provided a systematic review, searching among PubMed/Medline and Embase libraries. A total of 6 studies were identified (48 patients).

RESULTS

A total of 18 women were included. Preoperative planar images showed 51 SNs in 28 groins. Additional SPECT/CT images were acquired in 5/18 cases; SNs were identified pre- and intra-operatively in all cases. A total of 65 SNs were excised from 28 groins. A total of 13/18 (72.2%) patients (21/28 groins, 75%) had negative SNs with no groin recurrences and 12/13 (92.3%) were still alive at last follow-up. Five out of the 18 (27.8%) patients (7/28 groins, 25%) had positive SNs, 2/5 (40%) patients died of cancer after 26.2 and 33.8 months, respectively. The median DFS and OS for the entire cohort were 17.9 months (95% CI, 10.3-19.9) and 65.0 months (95% CI, 26.2-infinite), respectively. The probability of DFS and OS at 3 years were 15.5% (95% CI, 2.6-38.7) and 64.3% (95% CI, 15.5-90.2), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of preoperative lymphatic mapping followed by SNB permits a precise and minimally invasive surgical approach in cN0 vulvar melanoma patients. Negative SNB is associated with low risk of groin relapse and good survival.

Effectual surgical perineal reconstruction of malignant mucosal vulvar melanoma

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate a successful surgical treatment and reconstruction in a case of malignant mucosal vulvar melanoma.

CASE REPORT

A 52-year-old woman had stage II bulky malignant mucosal vulvar melanoma and received wide surgical excision with partial vulvectomy. She underwent 2-steps reconstructive vulvoplasty and vaginoplasty with skin grafting 1 year after initial surgical treatment. There was no evidence of recurrence after 3 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Vulvar melanoma is a rare malignant neoplasm. Wide local excision with reconstruction can relieve pelvic discomfort and restore local function after the surgery.

Anorectal and Genital Mucosal Melanoma: Diagnostic Challenges, Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Opportunities of Rare Melanomas

Mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare tumors, being less than 2% of all diagnosed melanomas, comprising a variegated group of malignancies arising from melanocytes in virtually all mucosal epithelia, even if more frequently found in oral and sino-nasal cavities, ano-rectum and female genitalia (vulva and vagina). To date, there is no consensus about the optimal management strategy of MM. Furthermore, the clinical rationale of molecular tumor characterization regarding BRAF, KIT or NRAS, as well as the therapeutic value of immunotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy, has not yet been deeply explored and clearly established in MM. In this overview, focused on anorectal and genital MM as models of rare melanomas deserving of a multidisciplinary approach, we highlight the need of referring these patients to centers with experts in melanoma, anorectal and uro-genital cancers treatments. Taking into account the rarity, the poor outcomes and the lack of effective treatment options for MM, tailored research needs to be promptly promoted.

Cancer of the vulva: 2021 update

Vulvar cancer is an uncommon gynecological malignancy primarily affecting postmenopausal women. There is no specific screening and the most effective strategy to reduce vulvar cancer incidence is the opportune treatment of predisposing and preneoplastic lesions associated with its development. While vulvar cancer may be asymptomatic, most women present with vulvar pruritus or pain, or have noticed a lump or ulcer. Therefore, any suspicious vulvar lesion should be biopsied to exclude invasion. Once established, the most common subtype is squamous cell carcinoma. Treatment of vulvar cancer depends primarily on histology and surgical staging. Treatment is predominantly surgical, particularly for squamous cell carcinoma, although concurrent chemoradiation is an effective alternative, particularly for advanced tumors. Management should be individualized and carried out by a multidisciplinary team in a cancer center experienced in the treatment of these tumors.

A useful update for trainees and specialists regarding the diagnosis, staging, treatment, and some controversies in the management of vulvar neoplasms.

Mucosal Melanoma: A Review Emphasizing the Molecular Landscape and Implications for Diagnosis and Management

Mucosal melanomas are rare, often aggressive tumors that can arise at any mucosal site but most frequently occur in the head and neck, vulvovaginal, and anorectal regions. They have distinct biological, clinical, and histopathologic features, which have important management implications. Recent whole-genome sequencing studies have led to a greater understanding of the molecular landscape of mucosal melanomas and uncovered oncogenic drivers that could potentially be susceptible to therapeutic manipulation. The authors provide a brief overview of epidemiologic, clinical, and histopathologic features of mucosal melanoma, with particular emphasis on recent advances in understanding, which have arisen from analyzing their molecular landscape.

Cancer of the Vulva: A Review

BACKGROUND

Vulvar cancers, although rare, are becoming an increasingly serious threat to women's health. Cancer of the vulva accounted for 0.3% of all new cancers in the United States in 2019, with 6,070 newly diagnosed cases. This review details the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of vulvar malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

To review cancer entities of the vulva, including vulvar intraepithelial neoplasms, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), malignant melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, and adenocarcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review using PubMed search for articles related to cancer of the vulva.

RESULTS

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasms represent premalignant precursors to SCC of the vulva. There are several different histopathologic subtypes of SCC, and treatment is dependent on characteristics of primary tumor and lymph node involvement. Melanoma is the second most common cancer to affect the vulva, and staging is based on tumor, node, and metastatic spread.

CONCLUSION

Vulvar malignancies are rare, and diagnosis is dependent on biopsy and pathologic evaluation. Treatment for vulvar malignancies depends on histopathologic diagnosis but ranges from wide local excision with or without lymph node biopsy or dissection to radiation therapy with chemo- or immunotherapy. Overall survival varies by diagnosis.

The role of sentinel lymph node mapping in lower genital tract melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Vulvar and vaginal melanomas are rare cancers of the female genital tract and account for 1% to 3% of all melanomas diagnosed in women. Due to the rarity of the disease, few data are available on the clinical and pathologic features of these cancers. Furthermore, treatment options are generally based on extrapolations of the information available for the more common cutaneous counterparts. Surgery represents the mainstay of treatment for lower genital tract melanoma. Moreover, the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) assessment is controversial because no prospective data are available.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Data were collected from Medline, Embase, Web of Sciences and Scopus databases. On July 10, 2020, we used the search comprising the terms "vulvar melanoma," "genital melanoma" and "vulvovaginal melanoma" including only studies in which SLN biopsy was performed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Ten retrospective studies have been found. No randomized trials have been reported. The studies included 132 patients while only 63 (47%) undergone SLN. 99mTC with or without blue dye followed by ultrastaging was highly accurate and is currently the gold standard. Mean detection rate was 98.3%. No clear evidence supported the execution of back lymphadenectomy (after SLN mapping), in fact, extrapolating data from cutaneous melanomas of other sites, completion of lymphadenectomy does not confer a melanoma-specific survival advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the small amount of available data, sentinel lymph node procedure is feasible and capable of identifying patients who have occult lymph node metastases. However, the potential role of the sentinel lymph node procedure as an alternative method of lymph node staging in patients with vulvar or vaginal melanoma needs further investigation.

Stage Two Malignant Melanoma of the Clitoris: A Case Report

Mucosal melanomas are rare in comparison to cutaneous melanomas, accounting for approximately 1% of all melanoma cases. Vulvovaginal melanoma is the least common mucosal melanoma subtype. For patients without distant metastases at presentation, regional lymph node involvement is the most important prognostic indicator. Lymphoscintigraphy is a method used to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN), directing subsequent biopsies to the lymph node at highest risk for cancer spread. We present a 67-year-old Hispanic female with stage II B (T4aN0M0) melanoma of the clitoris. The patient initially sought medical treatment for a pigmented vulvar lesion over her clitoris that occasionally bleeds. She stated that over the past month the lesion began to grow peripherally and then acquired a very dark color. The patient underwent local excision of the mass and subsequent pathology revealed malignant melanoma. The patient underwent lymphoscintigraphy which allowed localization and subsequent biopsy of the left inguinal sentinel node. The left inguinal sentinel node was negative for metastatic melanoma. It was opted to keep her under observation. Compared to cutaneous melanoma, patients with mucosal melanoma usually present with more advanced disease, and thus efficacious imaging practices play a significant role in the management of the disease. Lymphoscintigraphy is a well-tolerated, validated, cost-effective, and reliable method of detecting sentinel nodes with minimal radiation exposure to the patient. In our case, early clinical detection allowed for prompt surgical intervention, pathologic diagnosis, and reliable staging via lymphoscintigraphy of a rare form of malignant melanoma.

Recurrent vulvar melanoma in a patient with neurofibromatosis and gastrointestinal stromal tumour

We report a case of a 51-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis who presented in 2012 with postmenopausal bleeding. Excision biopsy of a pigmented lesion of the labia minora was consistent with an ulcerated vulvar BRAF wild type malignant melanoma (MM). Initial excision was followed by radical vulvectomy and adjuvant interferon. Local recurrence in January 2017 was further resected. Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT in May 2017 identified an FDG avid omental deposit; consistent histologically with MM when resected. Postoperative PET-CT in August 2017 demonstrated local recurrence. In the setting of resected stage IV disease and a third local recurrence, the decision was made to instigate immunotherapy. Vulvar melanoma is rare accounting for 0.2% of all melanoma. Presentation is typically a decade later than cutaneous melanoma with a tendency to late metastases and poorer prognosis. Given their rarity the treatment paradigm is less clearly defined and largely extrapolated from that of cutaneous melanomas.

Vulvar malignant melanoma: Pathogenesis, clinical behaviour and management: Review of the literature

Vulvar malignant melanoma (VMM) is a rare disease, accounting for 5% of all vulvar malignancies and is characterized by low survival and high recurrence rates. It is considered as a distinct entity of mucosal melanoma. Prognostic factors are higher age, advanced Breslow thickness, and lymph node involvement whilst central localization and ulceration status are still under debate. Surgery is the cornerstone for the treatment of primary VMM, however, it can be mutilating due to the anatomical location of the disease. Elective lymph node dissection is not part of standard care. The value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in VMM is still being studied. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment do not benefit survival. Immunotherapy in cutaneous melanoma has shown promising results but clinical studies in VMM are scarce. In metastatic VMM, checkpoint inhibitors and in case of BRAF or KIT mutated metastatic VMM targeted therapy have shown clinical efficacy. In this review, we present an overview of clinical aspects, clinicopathological characteristics and its prognostic value and the latest view on (adjuvant) therapy and follow-up.

Cancer of the vulva

Vulvar cancer is an uncommon gynecological malignancy primarily affecting postmenopausal women. There is no specific screening and the most effective strategy to reduce vulvar cancer incidence is the opportune treatment of predisposing and preneoplastic lesions associated with its development. While vulvar cancer may be asymptomatic, most women present with vulvar pruritus or pain, or have noticed a lump or ulcer. Therefore, any suspicious vulvar lesion should be biopsied to exclude invasion. Once established, the most common subtype is squamous cell carcinoma. Treatment of vulvar cancer depends primarily on histology and surgical staging. Treatment is predominantly surgical, particularly for squamous cell carcinoma, although concurrent chemoradiation is an effective alternative, particularly for advanced tumors. Management should be individualized, and carried out by a multidisciplinary team in a cancer center experienced in the treatment of these tumors.

Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2015 for the treatment of vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer

BACKGROUND

Vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer are relatively rare tumors, and there had been no established treatment principles or guidelines to treat these rare tumors in Japan. The first version of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guidelines for the treatment of vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer was published in 2015 in Japanese.

OBJECTIVE

The JSGO committee decided to publish the English version of the JSGO guidelines worldwide, and hope it will be a useful guide to physicians in a similar situation as in Japan.

METHODS

The guideline was created according to the basic principles in creating the guidelines of JSGO.

RESULTS

The guidelines consist of five chapters and five algorithms. Prior to the first chapter, basic items are described including staging classification and history, classification of histology, and definition of the methods of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy to give the reader a better understanding of the contents of the guidelines for these rare tumors. The first chapter gives an overview of the guidelines, including the basic policy of the guidelines. The second chapter discusses vulvar cancer, the third chapter discusses vaginal cancer, and the fourth chapter discusses vulvar Paget's disease and malignant melanoma. Each chapter includes clinical questions, recommendations, backgrounds, objectives, explanations, and references. The fifth chapter provides supplemental data for the drugs that are mentioned in the explanation of clinical questions.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the objective of these guidelines is to clearly delineate the standard of care for vulvar and vaginal cancer with the goal of ensuring a high standard of care for all women diagnosed with these rare diseases.

Sentinel node assessment for diagnosis of groin lymph node involvement in vulval cancer

BACKGROUND

Vulval cancer is usually treated by wide local excision with removal of groin lymph nodes (inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy) from one or both sides, depending on the tumour location. However, this procedure is associated with significant morbidity. As lymph node metastasis occurs in about 30% of women with early vulval cancer, accurate prediction of lymph node metastases could reduce the extent of surgery in many women, thereby reducing morbidity. Sentinel node assessment is a diagnostic technique that uses traceable agents to identify the spread of cancer cells to the lymph nodes draining affected tissue. Once the sentinel nodes are identified, they are removed and submitted to histological examination. This technique has been found to be useful in diagnosing the nodal involvement of other types of tumours. Sentinel node assessment in vulval cancer has been evaluated with various tracing agents. It is unclear which tracing agent or combination of agents is most accurate.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic test accuracy of various techniques using traceable agents for sentinel lymph node assessment to diagnose groin lymph node metastasis in women with FIGO stage IB or higher vulval cancer and to investigate sources of heterogeneity.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1946 to February 2013), EMBASE (1974 to March 2013) and the relevant Cochrane trial registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of traceable agents for sentinel node assessment (involving the identification of a sentinel node plus histological examination) compared with histological examination of removed groin lymph nodes following complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) in women with vulval cancer, provided there were sufficient data for the construction of two-by-two tables.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors (TAL, AP) independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance, classified studies for inclusion/exclusion and extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We used univariate meta-analytical methods to estimate pooled sensitivity estimates.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 34 studies evaluating 1614 women and approximately 2396 groins. The overall methodological quality of included studies was moderate. The studies included in this review used the following traceable techniques to identify sentinel nodes in their participants: blue dye only (three studies), technetium only (eight studies), blue dye plus technetium combined (combined tests; 13 studies) and various inconsistent combinations of these three techniques (mixed tests; 10 studies). For studies of mixed tests, we obtained separate test data where possible.Most studies used haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains for the histological examination. Additionally an immunohistochemical (IHC) stain with and without ultrastaging was employed by 14 and eight studies, respectively. One study used reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis (CA9 RT-PCR), whilst three studies did not describe the histological methods used.The pooled sensitivity estimate for studies using blue dye only was 0.94 (68 women; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 0.99), for mixed tests was 0.91 (679 women; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.98), for technetium only was 0.93 (149 women; 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) and for combined tests was 0.95 (390 women; 95% CI 0.89 to 0.97). Negative predictive values (NPVs) for all index tests were > 95%. Most studies also reported sentinel node detection rates (the ability of the test to identify a sentinel node) of the index test. The mean detection rate for blue dye alone was 82%, compared with 95%, 96% and 98% for mixed tests, technetium only and combined tests, respectively. We estimated the clinical consequences of the various tests for 100 women undergoing the sentinel node procedure, assuming the prevalence of groin metastases to be 30%. For the combined or technetium only tests, one and two women with groin metastases might be 'missed', respectively (95% CI 1 to 3); and for mixed tests, three women with groin metastases might be 'missed' (95% CI 1 to 9). The wide CIs associated with the pooled sensitivity estimates for blue dye and mixed tests increased the potential for these tests to 'miss' women with groin metastases.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is little difference in diagnostic test accuracy between the technetium and combined tests. The combined test may reduce the number of women with 'missed' groin node metastases compared with technetium only. Blue dye alone may be associated with more 'missed' cases compared with tests using technetium. Sentinel node assessment with technetium-based tests will reduce the need for IFL by 70% in women with early vulval cancer. It is not yet clear how the survival of women with negative sentinel nodes compares to those undergoing standard surgery (IFL). A randomised controlled trial of sentinel node dissection and IFL has methodological and ethical issues, therefore more observational data on the survival of women with early vulval cancer are needed.

A clinicopathological review of 33 patients with vulvar melanoma identifies c-KIT as a prognostic marker

Vulvar melanoma is the second most common vulvar cancer. Patients with vulvar melanoma usually present with the disease at a late stage and have a poor prognosis. The prognostic predictors reported in the literature are not unequivocal and the role of lichen sclerosus and c-KIT mutations in the aetiology of vulvar melanoma is unclear. Breslow staging currently seems to be the most adequate predictor of prognosis. We thus performed a clinicopathological and literature review to identify suitable predictors of prognosis and survival and investigated the expression of c-KIT (by immunohistochemistry) in patients with vulvar melanoma (n=33) from the Gynaecological Cancer Centres of the Royal Hospital for Women (Sydney, Australia) and John Hunter Hospital (Newcastle, Australia). Our series of 33 patients fitted the expected clinical profile of older women: delayed presentation, high stage, limited response to treatment and poor prognosis. We identified 3 patients (9.1%) with lichen sclerosus associated with melanoma in situ, although no lichen sclerosus was found in the areas of invasive melanoma. No patient had vulvar nevi. We identified a) Breslow's depth, b) an absence of any of the pathological risk factors, such as satellitosis, in-transit metastasis, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and dermal mitosis, c) removal of inguino-femoral lymph nodes, d) lateral margin of >1 cm, and e) c-KIT expression as valuable prognostic predictors for disease-free survival. We conclude that c-KIT expression is, apart from Breslow's depth, another valuable predictor of prognosis and survival. Lichen sclerosus may be associated with vulvar melanoma.

Current controversies in the management of patients with early-stage vulvar cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to outline current controversies in management of early-stage vulvar cancer. The main focus will be on the procedures for assessing the sentinel node and the treatment of those with evidence of metastatic involvement.

RECENT FINDINGS

Assessment of the sentinel node has recently been introduced into the standard treatment of early-stage squamous cell vulvar cancer. The combination of a radioactive tracer and blue dye is the most accurate technique for sentinel node detection. Preoperative imaging is recommended to rule out gross nodal involvement and ultrasound with fine needle aspiration cytology by an experienced radiologist appears to have the highest sensitivity/specificity for detecting metastases, although large comparative studies are not available. All patients with sentinel node metastases require additional treatment to the groin, independent of the size of metastasis in the sentinel node and currently this involves inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Further research is ongoing to investigate the role of radiotherapy instead of lymphadenectomy. The little experience there is of sentinel node biopsy in vulvar melanoma suggests that the procedure is feasible and inclusion criteria should follow those of cutaneous melanoma.

SUMMARY

Sentinel node biopsy is safe in treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer. Ongoing studies are investigating the optimal additional treatment for patients with a positive sentinel node in terms of efficacy and morbidity.

Vulvar melanoma: report on eleven cases and review of the literature

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Vulvar melanoma is a rare disease. We describe the experience of a single institution and review the literature.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective study at the Department of Gynecology, Hospital do Cancer A. C. Camargo.

METHODS

Eleven patients with vulvar melanoma attended between January 1987 and December 2006 were reviewed regarding clinicopathological characteristics, surgical therapy and follow-up.

RESULTS

The initial symptoms were vulvar lesions, pruritus, pain and bleeding. The median age was 64.8 years. The median depth of invasion was 3.08 mm. The staging ranged from IB to IIIC (American Joint Committee on Cancer, 2002). All the patients underwent vulvectomy. Two patients did not undergo primary elective lymphadenectomy. Bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy was performed on five patients, and one had unilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy. Sentinel lymph node investigation was performed on three patients. Five patients had locoregional recurrence. Prolonged survival was only achieved in the absence of lymph node involvement. The median follow-up was 56 months. The median disease-free survival was 15 months and the median overall survival was 29 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis for patients with vulvar melanoma is generally poor, with a high tendency towards regional and distant recurrence. Depth of invasion and lymph node involvement are the most important prognostic factors. In most cases, resection of the lesion with adequate margins may replace vulvectomy. Elective inguinal femoral lymphadenectomy remains the standard lymph node staging procedure. Sentinel lymph node investigation is feasible and should be performed by a multidisciplinary team with experience of this method.

A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology

The concept of radioguided surgery, which was first developed some 60 years ago, involves the use of a radiation detection probe system for the intraoperative detection of radionuclides. The use of gamma detection probe technology in radioguided surgery has tremendously expanded and has evolved into what is now considered an established discipline within the practice of surgery, revolutionizing the surgical management of many malignancies, including breast cancer, melanoma, and colorectal cancer, as well as the surgical management of parathyroid disease. The impact of radioguided surgery on the surgical management of cancer patients includes providing vital and real-time information to the surgeon regarding the location and extent of disease, as well as regarding the assessment of surgical resection margins. Additionally, it has allowed the surgeon to minimize the surgical invasiveness of many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, while still maintaining maximum benefit to the cancer patient. In the current review, we have attempted to comprehensively evaluate the history, technical aspects, and clinical applications of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in gynecological cancers: a critical review of the literature

Although it does not have a long history of sentinel node evaluation (SLN) in female genital system cancers, there is a growing number of promising study results, despite the presence of some aspects that need to be considered and developed. It has been most commonly used in vulvar and uterine cervivcal cancer in gynecological oncology. According to these studies, almost all of which are prospective, particularly in cases where Technetium-labeled nanocolloid is used, sentinel node detection rate sensitivity and specificity has been reported to be 100%, except for a few cases. In the studies on cervical cancer, sentinel node detection rates have been reported around 80–86%, a little lower than those in vulva cancer, and negative predictive value has been reported about 99%. It is relatively new in endometrial cancer, where its detection rate varies between 50 and 80%. Studies about vulvar melanoma and vaginal cancers are generally case reports. Although it has not been supported with multicenter randomized and controlled studies including larger case series, study results reported by various centers around the world are harmonious and mutually supportive particularly in vulva cancer, and cervix cancer. Even though it does not seem possible to replace the traditional approaches in these two cancers, it is still a serious alternative for the future. We believe that it is important to increase and support the studies that will strengthen the weaknesses of the method, among which there are detection of micrometastases and increasing detection rates, and render it usable in routine clinical practice.

Utility of sentinel node biopsy in vulvar and vaginal melanoma: report of two cases and review of the literature

Sentinel node (SN) biopsy is widely applied for treatment planning of cutaneous melanoma. However, using this strategy in female lower genital tract tumors has not yet been established. We report two cases, one each of vulvar and vaginal melanoma who underwent SN biopsy and review the available literature. Our experience and available limited evidence suggests that this low morbidity technique can be used for obtaining prognostic information and hence treatment planning for this disease. However, a false negative rate perhaps in the order of 15% suggests that careful consideration is necessary before using sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of vulvar and vaginal melanoma.

Sentinel lymph node in vulvar cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and accuracy of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure in vulvar cancer.

METHODS

From April 2004 to September 2006, all patients with vulvar cancer, clinical stages I and II, underwent SLN detection, followed by a complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Demographic, surgical, and pathologic data on all patients were prospectively entered in a database.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients underwent the SLN procedure. One patient was excluded from further analysis due to metastases to the vulva. The detection rate for at least 1 SLN per patient was 95%, with bilateral SLNs detected in 46% of patients. There was a trend toward improved ability to detect bilateral SLNs and proximity of the cancer to the midline (r = 0.996; P = .057). No contralateral SLNs were identified in patients with lateral vulvar lesions (>1 cm from the midline). For 'close-to-midline' (< or =1 cm from the midline) lesions, SLNs were detected in 93% of ipsilateral groins and bilateral SLNs were found in 46% of patients, whereas lesions abutting the midline had unilateral and bilateral SLN detected in 100% and 93%, respectively. Sixteen of 41 patients (39%) and 18 of 68 groins (26%) revealed metastatic disease in the lymph nodes; all were correctly identified by the SLN procedure. There were no false-negative SLN results.

CONCLUSIONS

SLN dissection is feasible and safe to perform in vulvar cancer. The ability to identify bilateral sentinel inguinal lymph nodes appears to be related to the proximity of the vulvar cancer to the midline.

Comparison of recurrence after vulvectomy and lymphadenectomy with and without sentinel node biopsy in early stage vulvar cancer

OBJECTIVES

To determine the usefulness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage vulvar cancer and to assess recurrences after surgical treatment with sentinel node identification or surgical treatment without sentinel node identification.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 55 patients with early stage vulvar cancer operated on between 1995 and 2005. A prospective series of 28 patients who underwent vulvectomy and lymphadenectomy with intraoperative sentinel lymph node identification between 2000 and 2005 (SLN group) was compared with a retrospective series of 27 patients who underwent vulvectomy and lymphadenectomy without sentinel node procedure between 1995 and 2000 (non-SLN group). Patients in the sentinel node identification group underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (technetium-99 colloid albumin injection around the tumor) and intraoperative mapping with isosulfan blue dye.

RESULTS

In the SLN group, 9 tumors were T1 and 19 were T2, with a total of 40 groins dissected and 9 positive nodes in 7 patients. Sixty-two sentinel lymph nodes were detected with a mean of 2.2 sentinel nodes per patient (range 0-4). A false negative case was found. In the non-SLN group, 7 tumors were T1 and 20 were T2, with a total of 49 groins dissected and 9 positive nodes in 6 patients. Recurrence occurred in 8 patients (28.6%) in the SLN group and in 6 (26.9%) in the non-SLN group (P=0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel lymph node identification in early stage vulvar cancer is a feasible. Analysis of recurrence may allow considering this procedure as a possible alternative to inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy.

The sentinel lymph node: Relevance in gynaecological cancers

AIMS

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection is widely practiced in the management of patients with malignant melanoma and beast cancer. Large studies on SLN detection and determination of nodal status have led to changes in the surgical management of the regional lymph nodes in these diseases. More recently attention has focused on other solid cancers, including gynaecological cancers.

METHODS

An extensive literature review of published reports on the SLN in gynaecological cancers was undertaken and the reports were categorised according to the level of evidence provided.

RESULTS

Vulva cancer is the most frequently investigated gynaecological cancer with regard to SLN detection because of its anatomical location and easily accessible nodal basin. Although there are no randomised controlled trials, some data suggest SLN detection in vulval cancer may alter clinical practice and reduce the number of groin lymphadenectomies. The lymphatic drainage of the other gynaecological organs is less predictable, the nodal basin less accessible or less well defined, the techniques not standardised and the evidence for the applicability of SLN detection in the management of these cancers is weak.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node detection in vulval cancer may reduce the need for radical groin lymphadenectomy and thereby reduce morbidity. SLN detection for other gynaecological cancers has little potential to alter clinical practice.

Validation and application of the sentinel lymph node concept in malignant vulvar tumours

PURPOSE

Inguinal lymphadenectomy, unilateral or bilateral, is widely used in cases of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma but has a high morbidity. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy may be used in the management of these patients. The aims of this study were firstly to determine the reliability of SLN biopsy in predicting regional lymph node status and secondly to apply this technique in the routine clinical setting.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 70 women with vulvar malignancies. The first 50 cases were of squamous vulvar cancer and were used to validate the SLN technique in this clinical setting (validation group). Once a satisfactory success rate had been achieved in the validation group, the SLN technique was applied to a further 20 patients with vulvar malignancies, i.e. squamous cell carcinoma (n=12) and melanomas (n=8) (application group). Dynamic and static images were acquired after the injection of 74-148 MBq of a colloidal albumin, and continued until SLN identification. Fifteen minutes before surgery, blue dye injection was administered in a similar manner to the radiocolloid. After incision, a hand-held gamma probe was used to find the SLN. In the validation group, dissection of the SLN was always followed by lymphadenectomy. In the application group, this procedure was only performed if the SLN was positive for metastases. For pathological staging, samples were evaluated using haematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In the validation group, lymphoscintigraphy allowed SLN detection in 49/50 patients (98%). Blue dye detected the SLN in 40/50 patients (80%). In 16 patients (33%), the SLN showed metastases in the pathology study. All 33 patients with negative SLN had regional lymph nodes negative for metastases (negative predictive value 100%). In the application group, lymphoscintigraphy showed drainage to an SLN in 19 out of 20 patients (95%) and blue dye demonstrated a stained SLN in 17/20 patients (85%). Seven of the 19 SLN-identified nodes (37%) were positive for metastases.

CONCLUSION

SLN identification permits the accurate pathological study of regional nodes and could reduce the high morbidity of current surgical treatment in vulvar tumour patients if the technique were to be adopted on a routine clinical basis.

Old and new perspectives in the management of high-risk, locally advanced or recurrent, and metastatic vulvar cancer

During the last decades there has been a continuing evolution in the surgical approach of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva that has been traditionally treated with radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy. Patients with T1 tumour are usually treated with radical local excision, if the lesion is unifocal and the remainder of the vulva is normal. Patients with T1a disease have no risk of groin metastases and do not need lymphadenectomy, whereas those with T1b disease need ipsilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy if the lesion is lateral, and bilateral lymphadenectomy if the lesion is midline. Modifications of the surgical technique of deep femoral lymphadenectomy and the mapping of sentinel node can offer new interesting therapeutic perspectives. Postoperative adjuvant pelvic and groin irradiation is warranted for patients with two or more or macroscopically involved groin nodes. Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva has been long surgically treated with en-block radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy plus partial resection of urethra, vagina or anum, or by exenteration, with severe postsurgical complications, poor quality of life, and unsatisfactory survival rates. 5-Fluorouracil [5-FU] or 5-FU- and cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent with irradiation followed by tailored surgery represents an attractive therapeutic option for advanced disease, planned to avoid such ultra-radical surgical procedures and, hopefully, to improve patient outcome. Chemotherapy has also been used in neoadjuvant setting, with contrasting and generally unsatisfactory results, and in palliative treatment of patients with distant metastases. Surgery is the primary treatment also for vulvar malignancies other than squamous cell carcinoma, whereas the clinical usefulness of adjuvant irradiation or chemotherapy is still to be defined. Primary chemoradiation can be also used for advanced carcinoma of the Bartholin gland or for advanced adenocarcinoma associated with extramammary Paget's disease. The drugs used for chemotherapy of metastatic melanomas or sarcomas of the vulva are the same employed for the melanomas or sarcomas developed in other sites.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node detection in gynecologic malignancies of the lower genital tract

The utility of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignancies of the female lower genital tract-- vulvar, vaginal, and cervical cancers--is being explored in multiple centers internationally. For patients with these tumors, lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node biopsy holds the promise of increasing the identification of microscopically metastatic disease while decreasing the morbidity of complete lymphadenectomy. In this review article we present the published data on mapping techniques and discuss the advantages and pitfalls of these procedures.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) offers a minimally invasive technique to examine the proximal lymph node basin for micrometastases in clinically N0 necks in patients head and neck cancer. This technique has been validated in the management of breast cancer and cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) and is under active investigation in the management of multiple other solid tumors.SLNB is used routinely in the management of head and neck melanoma and is investigational for other cancers of the head and neck. SLNB provides prognostic information for patients with CMM and identifies those patients that may benefit from additional treatment. This article examines the history, rationale,science, and current status of SLNB in head and neck with emphasis on melanoma.

Modern management of vulvar cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The radical surgical approach in the treatment of vulvar cancer patients has led to a favourable prognosis for the majority of patients with early stage vulvar cancer. However, morbidity is impressive, leading to more individualized treatment. The authors have reviewed the most recent literature on the pros and cons of the modifications in treatment, including surgery and primary radiotherapy, for primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and vulvar melanoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

The sentinel lymph node procedure is a promising method of staging in patients with early stage squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and possibly for patients with vulvar melanoma, but its safety still has to be proved. Less radical surgery has led to a higher local and regional recurrence rate. There may be a role for primary radiotherapy of the groin in a selected group of patients.

SUMMARY

The authors have concluded that the individualization of treatment for vulvar cancer patients has led to a decrease in morbidity but an increase in recurrences. The increase in recurrences does not appear to compromise prognosis, probably because of the lack of power, based on the low incidence of vulvar cancer. The sentinel lymph node procedure and primary radiotherapy are promising methods to reduce the morbidity of treatment but their safety needs to be studied in randomized trials.

The use of sentinel lymph nodes in gynaecological malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy represent one of the most revolutionary advances in oncological surgery in recent years. In this review, the current state of sentinel node detection in gynaecological cancers and its use in vulvar and cervical cancer are assessed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the recent clinical application of sentinel node biopsy for melanomas and breast cancer, there has been extensive research on the implementation of this technique to most solid neoplasias. Studies on the feasibility of sentinel node biopsy in vulvar cancer have shown that the status of the sentinel node is an accurate predictor of the status of inguinal nodes. The clinical implementation of the procedure requires validation and is under investigation. In the last two years, several pilot studies on the feasibility of lymphatic mapping/sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer have yielded promising results. There is minimal experience of its use in endometrial cancer. Detailed pathological study of a sentinel node biopsy with ultrastaging and immunohistochemical or polymerase chain reaction analyses can identify lymph node micrometastasis that conventional methods would identify as negative for metastatic disease. The best histopathological procedure for sentinel node biopsy, the clinical significance of micrometastases, and the appropriate management of such micrometastases are currently under investigation.

SUMMARY

Sentinel node biopsy is one of the main research interests in gynaecological oncological surgery. At present there are not enough data to permit modification of current treatment protocols. Large and multi-institutional trials are required in order to define the implementation of sentinel node biopsy in clinical practice with the objective of achieving safer and more conservative surgery.

Groin surgery and the sentinel lymph node

Vulvar cancer is a rare disease. Squamous-cell carcinomas account for 90% of vulvar cancers. The main mode of spread is lymphogenic to the inguinofemoral lymph nodes. Therefore, elective uni- or bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy is part of the standard treatment in combination with radical (wide) local excision of the vulvar tumour. Lymph drainage studies in relation to the biological behaviour of vulvar cancer are presented, as well as the anatomy and surgery of the groin. The sentinel lymph node procedure is a relatively new method of staging in vulvar cancer which may lead to the omission of inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in those patients identified as not having inguinofemoral lymph node metastases. The accuracy of this technique appears to be high, but its safety still has to be proven. Moreover, the role of additional histopathological techniques for the examination of the sentinel lymph nodes needs to be established.