A randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial of platinum therapy plus etoposide with or without concurrent vandetanib (ZD6474) in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: Hoosier Cancer Research Network LUN06-113

Achieving long-term survival in extensive-stage SCLC: a case report and mini literature review

Managing extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) has long been challenging for clinicians and oncologists due to its aggressive nature and poor prognosis. We report a case of a 41-year-old female with ES-SCLC who survived for six years, defying the disease's typically poor prognosis. Through a heavy treatment strategy involving chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, the patient experienced robust responses and avoided distant metastasis, including brain involvement. The long-term survival case in SCLC highlights the need for further research into personalized strategies and prognostic biomarkers. This case holds significant value for both clinicians and researchers as it challenges the conventional strategies for ES-SCLC and sets the stage for future evidence-based studies aimed at extending survival in SCLC.

Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included response rates, overall survival, disease-free survival or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 95 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address systemic therapy options, timing of therapy, treatment in patients who are older or with poor performance status, role of biomarkers, and use of myeloid-supporting agents in patients with small-cell lung cancer.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Metabolic adverse events of multitarget kinase inhibitors: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Multitargeted kinase inhibitors (MKIs) are used for the treatment of several cancers. By targeting multiple signaling pathways, MKIs have become cornerstones of the oncologic treatment. Although their use leads to important results in terms of survival, treatment with MKIs can determine important side effects the clinician must be aware of. Among those, arterial hypertension, mucositis and skin lesions are universally reported, while data about metabolic alterations are scarce. In our review, we focused on glucose and lipid alterations in MKI-treated patients.

METHODS

We searched for articles, published between January 2012 and December 2022, evaluating the effects on lipid and glucose metabolism of four MKIs (Cabozantinib, Lenvatinib, Sorafenib, and Vandetanib) in adult patients with cancer. We focused on drugs approved for thyroid malignancies, since a worse metabolic control may potentially impact life expectancy, due to their better overall survival rate.

RESULTS

As for glucose metabolism, the majority of the studies reported elevation of glucose levels (prevalence: 1-17%) with different grades of severity, including death. As for cholesterol, 12 studies reported worsening or new-onset hypercholesterolemia (prevalence: 4-40%). Finally, 19 studies reported different grades of hypertriglyceridemia (prevalence: 1-86%), sometimes leading to life-threatening events.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some inherent limitations, our analysis may cast light upon some of the MKIs metabolic disorders that can impact on patients' health, especially when long-term survival is expected. Future clinical trials should consider routine assessment of glucose and lipid levels, because underdetection and underreporting of alterations can lead to the overlooking of important adverse events.

First-line immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment in extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: A classical and network meta-analysis

Background

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a poor prognosis. For the last 30 years, first-line systemic treatment has remained unaltered. After the integration of ımmunotherapy, a new first-line gold standard, atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin plus etoposide, was approved in extensive-disease SCLC (ED-SCLC) in 2019.

Materials and Methods

First-line randomized controlled studies that investigated anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) and anti-T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) agents in combination with platinum plus etoposide (EP) were scoured. A total of six studies (two - anti-CTLA-4 and four - anti-PD1/PD-L1) were included and classic and network meta-analyses (NMAs) were performed.

Results

Fixed model for overall survival (OAS) in the PD-1- or PD-L1-treated subgroup yielded a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.746 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) =0.662-0.840 and in the CTLA-4-treated subgroup a HR of 0.941 with a 95% CI = 0.816-1.084 for the immune therapy + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy comparison (CTLA-4-based versus PD-1- or PD-L1-based groups' comparison of OAS effect Q = 6.05, df = 1, P = 0.014). NMA showed that all chemotherapy + immunotherapy combinations were equally potent and more efficient than PE in terms of OAS and progression-free survival (PFS). Rank probability plots demonstrated nivolumab + EP as the most probable effective treatment modality in terms of OAS and PFS.

Conclusion

The usage of anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy agents results in significant OAS advantage, and anti-PD1/PD-L1 agents are superior to anti-CTLA-4 approach in combination with platinum plus etoposide regimen in ED-SCLC.

Challenges in the treatment of small cell lung cancer in the era of immunotherapy and molecular classification

For many years the standard of care for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has remained unchanged. Despite decades of active research, current treatment options are limited and the prognosis of patients with extended disease (ED) SCLC remains poor. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents an exception and the only recent approval for ED-SCLC. However, the magnitude of benefit obtained with immunotherapy in SCLC is much more modest than that observed in other malignancies. Different pro-immunogenic or immunosuppressive features within the tumor microenvironment of SCLC may either modulate the sensitivity to immunotherapy or conversely dampen the efficacy of ICIs. Beside immunotherapy, a deeper understanding of the molecular biology of SCLC has led to the identification of new therapeutic targets for this lethal malignancy. Recent epigenetic and gene expression studies have resulted into a new molecular classification of four distinct subtypes of SCLC, defined by the relative expression of key transcription regulators and each characterized by specific therapeutic vulnerabilities. This review discusses the rationale for immunotherapy in SCLC and summarizes the main ICIs-trials in this tumor. We provide also an overview of new potential therapeutic opportunities and their integration with the new molecular classification of SCLC.

Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) as a predictive biomarker in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Endothelial activation and insult may contribute to the aggressive clinical course of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, no predictive biomarker for this pathogenesis has been identified.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical impact of the endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) in SCLC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, the EASIX was calculated from measurements of serum lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, and platelet levels. A total of 264 patients with SCLC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were stratified into high and low EASIX groups.

RESULTS

Complete and objective response rates in the limited-stage (LD) were 19.5% vs. 33.3% (P= 0.050) and 85.4% vs. 97.9% (P= 0.028) in the high and low EASIX groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the response rate between the two groups in the extensive-stage (ED). The median overall survival was 9.8 vs. 40.5 months in LD (P< 0.001) and 7.2 vs. 11.9 months in ED (P< 0.001) in the high and low EASIX groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses, a high EASIX level was an independent prognostic factor for worse progression-free and overall survival irrespective of stage.

CONCLUSION

EASIX may be a potential predictive biomarker of SCLC.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Inhibition of angiogenesis has been demonstrated to be an efficacious strategy in treating several tumors. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the most important protein with proangiogenic functions and it is overexpressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against VEGF, showed a promising activity in combination with etoposide and cisplatin as first-line treatment of patients with extended stage (ES)-SCLC and two randomized studies confirmed that bevacizumab improved PFS, but failed to prolong OS. Instead, disappointing results have been observed with endostar, sunitinib, sorafenib, vandetanib, and thalidomide in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line setting, with sunitinib in the maintenance setting, with sunitinib, cediranib and nintedanib as single agents or ziv-aflibercept in combination with topotecan in second-line setting. Only anlotinib improved OS and PFS as third-line therapy in Chinese patients with SCLC, and it was approved with this indication in China. Future challenges are the evaluation of the role of angiogenesis inhibitors in combination with immune- checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy in SCLC patients and the identification of predictive biomarkers of response to both agents.

Response to first-line treatment predicts progression-free survival benefit of small-cell lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib

Background

Anlotinib significantly extended progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) as third or later line treatment.

Methods

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in the clinical practice and aimed to identify risk factors for predicting the clinical benefit of anlotinib in SCLC patients. 29 SCLC patients treated with anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy as second or later line treatment were included. PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed.

Results

In whole patients, the median PFS was 2.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–3.2 months); The ORR and DCR were 10.3% and 48.3%, respectively; The median OS was 7.2 months (95%CI: 3.2–11.2 months). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that response to first‐line treatment was the independent risk factor for PFS. The ORR (20.0% vs. 0%) and DCR (53.3% vs. 42.9%) were promoted in patients treated with anlotinib combination therapy comparing to anlotinib monotherapy. The most common AEs were hoarseness, fatigue, decreased appetite, oral mucositis, and anemia. No treatment‐related AEs graded 3 or more.

Conclusion

Anlotinib is an effective option for SCLC patients with tolerable toxicity as second or later line treatment. Patients sensitive to first‐line treatment had longer PFS when treated with anlotinib. Anloitnib combined with other therapy increased the efficacy without adding toxicity.

Myeloid cell leukemia-1 is an important predictor of survival and progression of small cell lung cancer

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most fatal malignancy for which more effective therapies are urgently needed. Overexpression of myeloid cell leukemia-1 (Mcl-1) has been demonstrated to be one of the most common genetic alterations among different types of tumor/cancer, which induces resistance against various anti-cancer therapies including cisplatin. The study aimed to explore the role of Mcl-1 in the prognosis and resistance to anti-cancer therapy in patients with SCLC.

Methods

Patients with SCLC were recruited from those enrolled/treated in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Their specimens were collected for immunohistochemical evaluation. We compared the baseline characteristics, response to chemotherapy and overall survival (OS) of the patients with different expression levels of Mcl-1.

Results

The expression level of Mcl-1 was significantly lower in patients with limited stage SCLC than in those with extensive stage SCLC (P=0.014). Based on the median value of Mcl-1 expression level, the patients were divided into high and low Mcl-1 groups, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that low Mcl-1 expression was associated with a significant improvement in OS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.538. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic value of Mcl-1 expression level (P=0.014). Moreover, we found a significantly close relationship between higher Mcl-1 expression level and shorter time to progression (TTP) of the patients received chemotherapy (P=0.040).

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrated that Mcl-1 expression level was a prognostic biomarker for survival outcomes and cancer progression in the patients with SCLC. Thus, it could be used as a valuable biomarker in identifying those patients with high risk of treatment failure.

Opportunities and obstacles of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignant tumour which accounts for approximately 13-15% of all newly diagnosed lung cancer cases. To date, platinum-based chemotherapy are still the first-line treatments for SCLC. However, chemotherapy resistance and systemic toxicity limit the long-term clinical outcome of first-line treatment in SCLC. Recent years, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have made great breakthrough in cancer therapy, and researchers aim to exploit both as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy to improve the survival of SCLC patients, but limited effectiveness and the adverse events remain the major obstacles in the treatment of SCLC. To overcome these challenges for SCLC therapies, prevention and early diagnosis for this refractory disease is very important. At the same time, we should reveal more information about the pathogenesis of SCLC and the mechanism of drug resistance. Finally, new treatment strategies should also be taken into considerations, such as repurposing drug, optimising of targets, combination therapy strategies or prognostic biomarkers to enhance therapeutic effects and decrease the adverse events rates in SCLC patients. This article will review the molecular biology characteristics of SCLC and discuss the opportunities and obstacles of the current therapy for SCLC patients.

Tumor-Targeted Drug Conjugates as an Emerging Novel Therapeutic Approach in Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

There are few effective therapies for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), a highly aggressive disease representing 15% of total lung cancers. With median survival <2 years, SCLC is one of the most lethal cancers. At present, chemotherapies and radiation therapy are commonly used for SCLC management. Few protein-targeted therapies have shown efficacy in improving overall survival; immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are promising agents, but many SCLC tumors do not express ICI targets such as PD-L1. This article presents an alternative approach to the treatment of SCLC: the use of drug conjugates, where a targeting moiety concentrates otherwise toxic agents in the vicinity of tumors, maximizing the differential between tumor killing and the cytotoxicity of normal tissues. Several tumor-targeted drug conjugate delivery systems exist and are currently being actively tested in the setting of SCLC. These include antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), radioimmunoconjugates (RICs), small molecule-drug conjugates (SMDCs), and polymer-drug conjugates (PDCs). We summarize the basis of action for these targeting compounds, discussing principles of construction and providing examples of effective versus ineffective compounds, as established by preclinical and clinical testing. Such agents may offer new therapeutic options for the clinical management of this challenging disease in the future.

The impact of angiogenesis inhibitors on survival of patients with small cell lung cancer

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly invasive and lethal neuroendocrine tumor. Antiangiogenic drugs have been reported in the treatment of SCLC. We aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of angiogenic inhibitors on SCLC survival using network meta‐analysis.

Methods

The impact of five angiogenesis inhibitors, that is, vandetanib (Van), bevacizumab (Bev), Rh‐endostatin (End), sunitinib (Sun), and thalidomide (Tha), on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated by conducting a network meta‐analysis. RNA sequencing data were downloaded from publicly available databases.

Results

Nine phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), that involved 1599 participants, that investigated angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of SCLC were included in this meta‐analysis. Sun and Bev achieved better PFS than Tha (Bev VS. Tha, HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79‐0.98, Sun VS. Tha, HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65‐1.00). Moreover, Sun and Bev were superior to placebo in terms of PFS (Bev VS. Placebo, HR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.81‐0.97, Sun VS. Placebo, HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66‐1.00). Based on this study, we found no significant difference of OS of SCLC. The angiogenesis pathway and expression of target genes were globally deactivated in SCLC tissue.

Conclusion

Results of this network meta‐analysis indicate that the PFS outcome of SCLC with Sun or Bev drugs is superior to that of Tha. The improved therapeutic impact of angiogenesis inhibitors on SCLC needs more evidence, such as long‐term observation in clinical trials, to be validated.

Relationship between Progression-free Survival and Overall Survival in Randomized Clinical Trials of Targeted and Biologic Agents in Oncology

Introduction: With a gap in a full understanding of the mechanisms by which survival is extended for patients with cancer who are treated with novel biologic and targeted agents, there is the risk that discordant progression-free and overall survival outcomes are observed due to poor clinical trial design or biases in the interpretation of data. This study was designed to examine the role of study quality and design on the outcomes observed with biologic and targeted agents. Methods: A review of studies in clinicaltrials.gov supplemented with a literature review in OVID Medline was conducted to identify all randomized trials of a biologic/targeted agent versus a non-biologic/targeted comparator in oncology that report both median overall and progression-free survival outcomes. Details of the study, design, population, drugs, and outcomes were extracted. Study quality was evaluated using the PEDro scale. Data were summarized using SPSS 22.0.0.0. Results: A total of 192 unique studies of 206 pairwise comparisons between a biologic/targeted and comparator were identified. The average absolute magnitude of post-progression survival (difference between OS and PFS) was 9.7 months for biologic/targeted therapy and 9.8 for the comparator. A total of 64 comparisons (31.1%) showed an increase in OS and decrease in PFS, or vice versa, and 25 (12.1%) showed a magnitude of more than 4 months difference between the delta of OS and delta of PFS between the biologic/targeted and comparator arms. Average study quality was high overall (7.7/10), and was comparable for studies with directional differences (7.2/10) as well as for those with the greatest magnitude in post-progression survival (7.4/10). Conclusion: This review and analysis specifically examined small PFS benefit with large OS benefit as well as small OS benefit with large PFS benefit, including differences in direction of PFS and OS outcomes. No evidence was identified that these are the result of poor study design, but may rather be due to the mechanism of action, specific disease, and population under study. Further work is needed to understand the mechanism of action of novel biologic/targeted agents to better understand their interaction with the tumor microenvironment.

Future Options of Molecular-Targeted Therapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. With a focus on histology, there are two major subtypes: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (the more frequent subtype), and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (the more aggressive one). Even though SCLC, in general, is a chemosensitive malignancy, relapses following induction therapy are frequent. The standard of care treatment of SCLC consists of platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with etoposide that is subsequently enhanced by PD-L1-inhibiting atezolizumab in the extensive-stage disease, as the addition of immune-checkpoint inhibition yielded improved overall survival. Although there are promising molecular pathways with potential therapeutic impacts, targeted therapies are still not an integral part of routine treatment. Against this background, we evaluated current literature for potential new molecular candidates such as surface markers (e.g., DLL3, TROP-2 or CD56), apoptotic factors (e.g., BCL-2, BET), genetic alterations (e.g., CREBBP, NOTCH or PTEN) or vascular markers (e.g., VEGF, FGFR1 or CD13). Apart from these factors, the application of so-called 'poly-(ADP)-ribose polymerases' (PARP) inhibitors can influence tumor repair mechanisms and thus offer new perspectives for future treatment. Another promising therapeutic concept is the inhibition of 'enhancer of zeste homolog 2' (EZH2) in the loss of function of tumor suppressors or amplification of (proto-) oncogenes. Considering the poor prognosis of SCLC patients, new molecular pathways require further investigation to augment our therapeutic armamentarium in the future.

Current and future therapeutic approaches for the treatment of small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very aggressive disease characterized by a high response rate to first-line chemotherapy, but most patients relapse within 1 year with disappointing results to second-line treatments. Chemotherapy has reached a plateau of effectiveness and new therapeutic strategies are needed to change the natural history of SCLC. Areas covered: This review will focus on the current results and the future development of the therapeutic approaches for the treatment of SCLC. Expert commentary: Immunotherapy is becoming a new frontier for the management of SCLC with preliminary interesting results. To date, no targeted drugs have been approved for clinical practice but several novel agents are in an advanced stage of clinical development in SCLC.

Cardiovascular diseases in patients receiving small molecules with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor activity: A meta-analysis of approximately 29,000 cancer patients

Background

Targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor activity improves survival of cancer patients. Cardiovascular complications are critical and it is unknown whether these require specific treatment strategies. We aimed to clarify the associated risk of cardiovascular adverse events in patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Design

The design of this study was a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and Web of Science databases for randomised controlled trials published until January 2017 that assessed patients with different types of cancer treated with or without tyrosine kinase inhibitors in addition to standard chemotherapy.

Results

A total of 29,252 patients from 71 randomised controlled trials were included. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment was associated with a higher cardiac ischaemia relative risk (relative risk = 1.69; 95% confidence interval: 1.12–2.57; p = 0.01), with the highest risks observed for sorafenib and patients with renal cancer. Risk of thrombocytopaenia (relative risk = 2.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.73–2.79; p < 0.001) was highest for regorafenib and patients with breast cancer. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction was increased after tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (relative risk = 2.53; 95% confidence interval:1.79 – 3.57; p < 0.001), with the highest risks reported for sunitinib and hepatocellular cancer. QT corrected interval prolongation (relative risk = 6.25; 95% confidence interval: 3.44–11.38; p < 0.001) and arterial hypertension (relative risk = 3.78; 95% confidence interval: 3.15-4.54; p < 0.001) were reported. The relative risks of arterial adverse events, cerebral ischaemia, venous adverse events and pulmonary embolism were similar across groups.

Conclusion

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors increase the risk of severe cardiovascular and particularly thrombotic adverse events. Specific treatment regimens when prescribing tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies appear desirable.

Anti-cancer agents and reactive oxygen species modulators that target cancer cell metabolism

Traditionally the perspective on reactive oxygen species (ROS) has centered on the role they play as carcinogenic or cancer-causing radicals. Over the years, characterization and functional studies have revealed the complexity of ROS as signaling molecules that regulate various physiological cellular responses or whose levels are altered in various diseases. Cancer cells often maintain high basal level of ROS and are vulnerable to any further increase in ROS levels beyond a certain protective threshold. Consequently, ROS-modulation has emerged as an anticancer strategy with synthesis of various ROS-inducing or responsive agents that target cancer cells. Of note, an increased carbohydrate uptake and/or induction of death receptors of cancer cells was exploited to develop glycoconjugates that potentially induce cellular stress, ROS and apoptosis. This mini review highlights the development of compounds that target cancer cells by taking advantage of redox or metabolic alteration in cancer cells.

Bevacizumab in advanced lung cancer: state of the art

Despite recent advances in metastatic lung cancer treatment with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecules targeting addictive genomic abnormalities, prognosis of most of the patients remains unfavorable. Combination approaches with older drugs, such as bevacizumab, should be thus envisioned. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody, approved by the US FDA and the EMA in first-line and maintenance settings of advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, in association with platinum-based chemotherapy. In the years to come, bevacizumab might be associated with new molecular therapies or immuno-oncology drugs, in order to optimize response rates and overcome resistances. This review summarizes the pharmacologic properties, clinical efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in advanced lung cancer treatment, with a focus on NSCLC, EGFR-mutant NSCLC and small-cell lung cancer.

Risk of gastrointestinal events with newly approved (after 2011) vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

We performed a meta-analysis to systematically review the gastrointestinal (GI) events (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anorexia) of five newly approved (after 2011) VEGFR-TKIs in cancer patients.

METHODS

The relevant studies of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cancer patients treated with cabozantinib, vandetanib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, and axitinib were retrieved and the systematic evaluation was conducted.

RESULTS

Forty-one randomized controlled trials and 10,860 patients were included. Current analysis suggested that the use of these agents increased the risk of all-grade and high-grade GI events, and the diarrhea was the most common GI events. The risk of all-grade and high-grade GI events varies significantly within drug types, tumor types, and VEGFR-TKIs-based regimens.

CONCLUSION

The available data suggested that the use of the five newly approved VEGFR-TKIs may increase risk of GI events in cancer patients. Physicians and patients should be aware of these risks and frequent monitoring and careful management should be emphasized when managing these VEGFR-TKIs.

Advances in antiangiogenic treatment of small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine malignancy, has a rapid growth rate, strong aggressiveness, early metastases, and poor prognosis. Angiogenesis greatly contributes to the metastatic process of SCLC, which has a higher vascularization compared with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SCLC might constitute an ideal malignancy for assessing new antiangiogenic drugs and therapeutic strategies. Combining bevacizumab with paclitaxel has therapeutic benefits in chemoresistant, relapsed SCLC. The cisplatin–etoposide and bevacizumab combination, as the first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC, can improve progression-free survival (PFS), with an acceptable toxicity profile. Ziv-aflibercept combined with topotecan is promising for platinum-refractory SCLC. Chemotherapy combined with thalidomide cannot prolong survival. Maintenance sunitinib of 37.5 mg/day in extensive-stage SCLC patients following induction chemotherapy with platinum/etoposide improves median PFS by 1.6 months. Serum angiopoietin-2 concentrations and vascular endothelial growth factor levels correlate with poor prognosis. Bevacizumab, ziv-aflibercept, and sunitinib are worthy of further evaluation. Thalidomide, sorafenib, pomalidomide, and cediranib may not be suitable for SCLC.