Outpatient administration of naxitamab in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with refractory and/or relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma: Management of adverse events

Omalizumab for Treatment of Anti-GD2 Antibody-related Urticaria

Outcomes for high-risk neuroblastoma have improved with the addition of antidisialoganglioside (GD2) antibody-mediated immunotherapy to multimodality therapy. Urticaria is an expected side effect of anti-GD2 immunotherapy. Rarely, despite maximal use of antihistamines and H2 receptor antagonists, refractory urticaria can result in impaired quality of life, and delays or discontinuation of immunotherapy. The anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, omalizumab, is approved for the treatment of asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria. We successfully managed grade 3, naxitamab-related urticaria refractory to standard management in 2 patients using omalizumab, allowing for continued anti-GD2 immunotherapy. Omalizumab did not impact antitumor activity or immunogenicity of naxitamab.

Characterizing Relationships between T-cell Inflammation and Outcomes in Patients with High-Risk Neuroblastoma According to Mesenchymal and Adrenergic Signatures

Recent insights have identified adrenergic (ADRN) and mesenchymal (MES) cell lineages as distinct biologic cell types and T-cell inflammation as a prognostic marker in neuroblastoma. We hypothesized that elucidating unique and overlapping aspects of these biologic features could serve as novel biomarkers for informing ongoing efforts to improve therapeutic approaches for children with high-risk neuroblastoma. We identified lineage-specific, single-stranded super-enhancers to define ADRN and MES specific genes. Publicly available RNA-seq of diagnostic tumor biopsies was used in Discovery and Validation cohorts. Each tumor was assigned a relative MES score and T-cell inflammation (TCI) score. Survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were assessed by the log-rank test. Inflammation scores were correlated with MES scores and anticorrelated with MYCN-amplification in both cohorts. Among patients with high-risk, ADRN tumors, those with TCI tumors had superior overall survival to those with non-inflamed tumors. A similar, but nonsignificant, trend was observed in the Validation cohort. Conversely, there was no difference according to TCI status in the MES cohort in either the Discover or Validation cohorts. High-inflammation scores were correlated with improved survival in some patients with high-risk, ADRN but not MES neuroblastoma. Our findings bolster support for further developing T-cell-based and immunotherapy-based approaches for children with high-risk neuroblastoma of varying MES and ADRN expression.

SIGNIFICANCE

Adrenergic (ADRN) and mesenchymal (MES) lineages are distinct biologic cell types in neuroblastoma. We defined ADRN and MES specific genes and found that high-risk, ADRN tumors harboring elevated T-cell inflammation signatures had superior overall survival. Our findings bolster support for further developing immunotherapy-based approaches for children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

Desensitizing the autonomic nervous system to mitigate anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody side effects

Background

Anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have shown to improve the overall survival of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB). Serious adverse events (AEs), including pain, within hours of antibody infusion, have limited the development of these therapies. In this study, we provide evidence of Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) activation as the mechanism to explain the main side effects of anti-GD2 mAbs.

Methods

Through confocal microscopy and computational super-resolution microscopy experiments we explored GD2 expression in postnatal nerves of infants. In patients we assessed the ANS using the Sympathetic Skin Response (SSR) test. To exploit tachyphylaxis, a novel infusion protocol (the Step-Up) was mathematically modelled and tested.

Results

Through confocal microscopy, GD2 expression is clearly visible in the perineurium surrounding the nuclei of nerve cells. By computational super-resolution microscopy experiments we showed the selective expression of GD2 on the cell membranes of human Schwann cells in peripheral nerves (PNs) significantly lower than on NB. In patients, changes in the SSR were observed 4 minutes into the anti-GD2 mAb naxitamab infusion. SSR latency quickly shortened followed by gradual decrease in the amplitude before disappearance. SSR response did not recover for 24 hours consistent with tachyphylaxis and absence of side effects in the clinic. The Step-Up protocol dissociated on-target off-tumor side effects while maintaining serum drug exposure.

Conclusion

We provide first evidence of the ANS as the principal non-tumor target of anti-GD2 mAbs in humans. We describe the development and modeling of the Step-Up protocol exploiting the tachyphylaxis phenomenon we demonstrate in patients using the SSR test.

GM-CSF, G-CSF or no cytokine therapy with anti-GD2 immunotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma

Colony-stimulating factors have been shown to improve anti-disialoganglioside 2 (anti-GD2) monoclonal antibody response in high-risk neuroblastoma by enhancing antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). A substantial amount of research has focused on recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as an adjuvant to anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies. There may be a disparity in care among patients as access to GM-CSF therapy and anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies is not uniform. Only select countries have approved these agents for use, and even with regulatory approvals, access to these agents can be complex and cost prohibitive. This comprehensive review summarizes clinical data regarding efficacy and safety of GM-CSF, recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or no cytokine in combination with anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies (ie, dinutuximab, dinutuximab beta or naxitamab) for immunotherapy of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. A substantial body of clinical data support the immunotherapy combination of anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies and GM-CSF. In contrast, clinical data supporting the use of G-CSF are limited. No formal comparison between GM-CSF, G-CSF and no cytokine has been identified. The treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with anti-GD2 therapy plus GM-CSF is well established. Suboptimal efficacy outcomes with G-CSF raise concerns about its suitability as an alternative to GM-CSF as an adjuvant in immunotherapy for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. While programs exist to facilitate obtaining GM-CSF and anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies in regions where they are not commercially available, continued work is needed to ensure equitable therapeutic options are available globally.

GD2-targeting therapy: a comparative analysis of approaches and promising directions

Disialoganglioside GD2 is a promising target for immunotherapy with expression primarily restricted to neuroectodermal and epithelial tumor cells. Although its role in the maintenance and repair of neural tissue is well-established, its functions during normal organism development remain understudied. Meanwhile, studies have shown that GD2 plays an important role in tumorigenesis. Its functions include proliferation, invasion, motility, and metastasis, and its high expression and ability to transform the tumor microenvironment may be associated with a malignant phenotype. Structurally, GD2 is a glycosphingolipid that is stably expressed on the surface of tumor cells, making it a suitable candidate for targeting by antibodies or chimeric antigen receptors. Based on mouse monoclonal antibodies, chimeric and humanized antibodies and their combinations with cytokines, toxins, drugs, radionuclides, nanoparticles as well as chimeric antigen receptor have been developed. Furthermore, vaccines and photoimmunotherapy are being used to treat GD2-positive tumors, and GD2 aptamers can be used for targeting. In the field of cell therapy, allogeneic immunocompetent cells are also being utilized to enhance GD2 therapy. Efforts are currently being made to optimize the chimeric antigen receptor by modifying its design or by transducing not only αβ T cells, but also γδ T cells, NK cells, NKT cells, and macrophages. In addition, immunotherapy can combine both diagnostic and therapeutic methods, allowing for early detection of disease and minimal residual disease. This review discusses each immunotherapy method and strategy, its advantages and disadvantages, and highlights future directions for GD2 therapy.

Guidelines for outpatient administration of naxitamab: Experience from Atrium Health Levine Children's Hospital

AIM

In this publication, we will share our experience of AE management, provide guidance for appropriate staffing, and the discuss the importance of patient education when treating patients with R/R HR neuroblastoma using naxitamab.

BACKGROUND

Approved treatments for patients with refractory and/or relapsed (R/R) high-risk (HR) neuroblastoma are limited, and there is a high unmet need for new treatment combinations. Naxitamab is a disialoganglioside 2 (GD2)-binding antibody that was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2020 for use in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of patients with R/R HR neuroblastoma in the bone and/or bone marrow and who have demonstrated a partial response, minor response, or stable disease with prior therapy.

METHODS

The pediatric oncology team at Atrium Health Levine Children's Hospital has successfully treated several patients with naxitamab both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, with no patients requiring unplanned overnight hospitalization and few severe adverse events (AEs). To accomplish this, the team at Levine Children's Hospital established standard operating procedures for naxitamab, a therapy defined as high acuity due to the potential for acute AEs with rapid onset and that benefits from continuous monitoring by a nursing team and a dedicated provider.

CONCLUSIONS

This will provide a practical guide for institutions offering naxitamab to their patients, and ensure successful administration of this high acuity treatment in the outpatient setting.

Early Salvage Chemo-Immunotherapy with Irinotecan, Temozolomide and Naxitamab Plus GM-CSF (HITS) for Patients with Primary Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma Provide the Best Chance for Long-Term Outcomes

Patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB) who are unable to achieve a complete response (CR) to induction therapy have worse outcomes. We investigated the combination of humanized anti-GD2 mAb naxitamab (Hu3F8), irinotecan (I), temozolomide (T), and sargramostim (GM-CSF)-HITS-against primary resistant HR-NB. Eligibility criteria included having a measurable chemo-resistant disease at the end of induction (EOI) treatment. Patients were excluded if they had progressive disease (PD) during induction. Prior anti-GD2 mAb and/or I/T therapy was permitted. Each cycle, administered four weeks apart, comprised Irinotecan 50 mg/m2/day intravenously (IV) plus Temozolomide 150 mg/m2/day orally (days 1-5); naxitamab 2.25 mg/kg/day IV on days 2, 4, 8 and 10, (total 9 mg/kg or 270 mg/m2 per cycle), and GM-CSF 250 mg/m2/day subcutaneously was used (days 6-10). Toxicity was measured using CTCAE v4.0 and responses through the modified International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC). Thirty-four patients (median age at treatment initiation, 4.9 years) received 164 (median 4; 1-12) HITS cycles. Toxicities included myelosuppression and diarrhea, which was expected with I/T, and pain and hypertension, expected with naxitamab. Grade ≥3-related toxicities occurred in 29 (85%) of the 34 patients; treatment was outpatient. The best responses were CR = 29% (n = 10); PR = 3% (n = 1); SD = 53% (n = 18); PD = 5% (n = 5). For cohort 1 (early treatment), the best responses were CR = 47% (n = 8) and SD = 53% (n = 9). In cohort 2 (late treatment), the best responses were CR = 12% (n = 2); PR = 6% (n = 1); SD = 53% (n = 9); and PD = 29% (n = 5). Cohort 1 had a 3-year OS of 84.8% and EFS 54.4%, which are statistically significant improvements (EFS p = 0.0041 and OS p = 0.0037) compared to cohort 2. In conclusion, naxitamab-based chemo-immunotherapy is effective against primary chemo-resistant HR-NB, increasing long-term outcomes when administered early during the course of treatment.

Novel infusion strategy reduces severe adverse events caused by the anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody naxitamab

Introduction

Anti-disialoganglioside 2 (anti-GD2) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are associated with Grade ≥3 (≥G3) adverse events (AEs) such as severe pain, hypotension, and bronchospasm. We developed a novel method of administering the GD2-binding mAb naxitamab, termed "Step-Up" infusion (STU), to reduce the risk of AEs of severe pain, hypotension, and bronchospasm.

Methods

Forty-two patients with GD2-positive tumors received naxitamab under "compassionate use" protocols and administered via either the standard infusion regimen (SIR) or the STU regimen. The SIR comprises a 60-min infusion of 3 mg/kg/day on Day 1 of cycle 1 and a 30- to 60-min infusion on Day 3 and Day 5, as tolerated. The STU regimen uses a 2-h infusion on Day 1, initiated at a rate of 0.06 mg/kg/h during 15 min (0.015 mg/kg) and which increases gradually to a cumulative dose of 3 mg/kg; on Days 3 and 5, the 3-mg/kg dose is initiated at 0.24 mg/kg/h (0.06 mg/kg) and delivered in 90 min according to the same gradual-increase strategy. AEs were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

Results

The frequency of infusions with an associated G3 AE was reduced from 8.1% (23/284 infusions) with SIR to 2.5% (5/202 infusions) with STU. The odds of an infusion being associated with a G3 AE reduced by 70.3% with STU vs. SIR (odds ratio: 0.297; p = 0.037). Mean serum naxitamab levels pre- and post-STU (11.46 µg/ml pre-infusion; 100.95 µg/ml post-infusion) were within the range reported for SIR.

Discussion

The comparable pharmacokinetics of naxitamab during SIR and STU may indicate that switching to STU reduces G3 AEs without impact on efficacy.