1
|
Roth M, King L, St Cyr K, Mohsin U, Balderson K, Rhind S, Goldman A, Richardson D. Evaluating the prospective utility of pharmacogenetics reporting among Canadian Armed Forces personnel receiving pharmacotherapy: a preliminary assessment towards precision psychiatric care. BMJ Mil Health 2024; 170:440-445. [PMID: 37657847 DOI: 10.1136/military-2023-002447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacological interventions for treating posttraumatic stress disorder in Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) members and Veterans often achieve modest results. The field of pharmacogenetics, or the study of how genes influence an individual's response to different medications, offers insight into how prior knowledge of gene-drug interactions may potentially improve the trial-and-error process of drug selection in pharmacotherapy, thereby improving treatment effects and remission rates. Given the relative recency of pharmacogenetics testing and sparse research in military samples, we used pharmacogenetics testing in a small pilot group (n=23) of CAF members and Veterans who were already engaged in pharmacotherapy for a service-related mental health condition to better understand the associated opportunities and challenges of pharmacogenetics testing in this population. Our preliminary evaluation involved: (1) reporting the prevalence of pharmacogenetics testing 'bin' status according to participants' reports ('green', 'yellow' or 'red'; intending to signal 'go', 'caution' or 'stop', regarding the potential for gene-drug interactions); (2) calculating the percentage of currently prescribed psychotropic medications that were assessed and included in the reports; (3) evaluating whether prescribers used pharmacogenetics testing information according to clinical notes and (4) collecting informal feedback from participating psychiatrists. While pharmacogenetics testing appeared to provide valuable information for a number of clients, a major limitation was the number of commonly prescribed medications not included in the reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Roth
- Operational Stress Injury Clinic-Greater Toronto Site, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MacDonald Franklin Operational Stress Injury Research Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - L King
- Operational Stress Injury Clinic - Parkwood Main Site, SJHC, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - K St Cyr
- MacDonald Franklin Operational Stress Injury Research Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - U Mohsin
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - K Balderson
- Operational Stress Injury Clinic - Parkwood Main Site, SJHC, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - S Rhind
- Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Goldman
- DNA Labs Canada Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Richardson
- MacDonald Franklin Operational Stress Injury Research Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
- Operational Stress Injury Clinic - Parkwood Main Site, SJHC, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu A, Raack EJ, Ross CJD, Carleton BC. Implementation and Evaluation Strategies for Pharmacogenetic Testing in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review. Ther Drug Monit 2024:00007691-990000000-00266. [PMID: 39264345 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000001243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacogenetic testing in clinical settings has improved the safety and efficacy of drug treatment. There is a growing number of studies evaluating pharmacogenetic implementation and identifying barriers and facilitators. However, no review has focused on bridging the gap between identifying barriers and facilitators of testing and the clinical strategies adopted in response. This review was conducted to understand the implementation and evaluation strategies of pharmacogenetic testing programs. METHODS A PRISMA-compliant scoping review was conducted. The included studies discussed pharmacogenetic testing programs implemented in a hospital setting. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed design methods were included. RESULTS A total of 232 of the 7043 articles that described clinical pharmacogenetic programs were included. The most common specialties that described pharmacogenetic implementation were psychiatry (26%) and oncology (16%), although many studies described institutional programs implemented across multiple specialties (19%). Different specialties reported different clinical outcomes, but all reported similar program performance indicators, such as test uptake and the number of times the test recommendations were followed. There were benefits and drawbacks to delivering test results through research personnel, pharmacists, and electronic alerts, but active engagement of physicians was necessary for the incorporation of pharmacogenetic results into clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS Further research is required on the maintenance and sustainability of pharmacogenetic testing initiatives. These findings provide an overview of the implementation and evaluation strategies of different specialties that can be used to improve pharmacogenetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Wu
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of British Columbia
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute
| | - Edward J Raack
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia
| | - Colin J D Ross
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute
- Division of Translational Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia; and
| | - Bruce C Carleton
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia
- Division of Translational Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia; and
- Therapeutic Evaluation Unit, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Santenna C, Shubham A, Ratinder J, Abhijit R, Tamonud M, Jitendra S, Shamim MA, Balakrishnan S. Drug metabolizing enzymes pharmacogenetic variation-informed antidepressant therapy approach for common mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2024; 367:832-844. [PMID: 39265864 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 09/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Currently, 30-50 % of individuals with depression and 40 % with anxiety-collectively referred to as common mental disorders (CMDs), exhibit inadequate responses to antidepressant treatments. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness and safety of drug-metabolizing enzyme pharmacogenetic variation informed treatment (PGxIT) versus usual antidepressant treatment (UT) in patients with CMDs. DATA SOURCES A literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception until January 30, 2024. STUDY SELECTION Studies were selected based on CMD diagnoses, reporting on the genetic variations of drug-metabolizing enzyme (DME) genes in relation to antidepressants, involving PGxIT and UT groups with human subjects, and published in English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors. A pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95 % CI was estimated using both random and fixed-effect models, and heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the I2 statistic. The publication bias of eligible studies was assessed using post hoc Doi plots and the LFK index. RESULTS This systematic review included 18 studies (n = 7021). The PGxIT demonstrated greater efficacy in the remission of symptoms of depressive disorder at 8 weeks (RR 1.523 [95 % CI: 1.255-1.843]; I2 = 48 %) and 12 weeks (RR 1.631 [95 % CI: 1.001-2.657]; I2 = 86 %; p < 0.01), and symptoms of anxiety disorder compared to UT. Additionally, the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs) was significantly lower in the PGxIT group (RR = 0.65 [95 % CI: 0.52-0.82]; I2 = 0 %) than in the UT group. The certainty of evidence for both outcomes was moderate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that pharmacogenetically guided antidepressant treatment, based on genetic variation in drug-metabolizing enzymes, is associated with superior efficacy in the remission of symptoms for patients with depressive disorders and a reduction in ADEs compared to usual treatment and the findings of the systematic review for remission in anxiety disorders indicate that, PGx guided treatment is also associated with increased remission of symptoms in anxiety disorders compared to usual treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenchula Santenna
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462020, India.
| | - Atal Shubham
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462020, India
| | - Jhaj Ratinder
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462020, India
| | - Rozatkar Abhijit
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhopal, Bhopal 462020, India
| | - Modak Tamonud
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhopal, Bhopal 462020, India
| | - Singh Jitendra
- Department of Translational Medicine(,) All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhopal, Bhopal 462020, India
| | - Muhammad Aaqib Shamim
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences - Jodhpur, Jodhpur 342005, India
| | - S Balakrishnan
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462020, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Johnson L, Youssef E, O'Shea J, Thornley T, Gallagher J, Ledwidge M, Ryan C. Estimating the prevalence of potential and actionable drug-gene interactions in Irish primary care: A cross-sectional study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 90:2280-2298. [PMID: 38864275 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.16122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Pharmacogenetics (PGx) is increasingly recognized as a strategy for medicines optimisation and prevention of adverse drug reactions. According to guidelines produced by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) and the Dutch Pharmacogenetic Working Group (DPWG), most medicines with drug-gene interactions (DGIs) are prescribed in primary care. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of potential and actionable DGIs involving all medicines dispensed in Irish primary care. METHODS Dispensings of 46 drugs to General Medical Services (GMS) patients in the Health Service Executive Primary Care Reimbursement Service Irish pharmacy claims database from 01 January 2021 to 31 December 2021 were analysed to estimate the national prevalence of total dispensings and incidence of first-time dispensings of drugs with potential DGIs according to the CPIC and/or DPWG guidelines. Phenotype frequency data from the UK Biobank and the CPIC were used to estimate the incidence of actionable DGIs. RESULTS One in five dispensings (12 443 637 of 62 754 498, 19.8%) were medicines with potential DGIs, 1 878 255 of these dispensed for the first time. On application of phenotype frequencies and linked guideline based therapeutic recommendations, 2 349 055 potential DGIs (18.9%) required action, such as monitoring and guarding against maximum dose, drug or dose change. One in five (369 700, 19.7%) first-time dispensings required action, with 139 169 (7.4%) requiring a change in prescribing. Antidepressants, weak opioids and statins were most commonly identified as having actionable DGIs. CONCLUSIONS This study estimated a high prevalence of DGIs in primary care in Ireland, identifying the need and opportunity to optimize drug therapy through PGx testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Johnson
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - E Youssef
- Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care & Education, Kingston University, London, UK
| | - J O'Shea
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - T Thornley
- School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J Gallagher
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Ledwidge
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Ryan
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beer C, Rae F, Semmler A, Voisey J. Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prediction of Medication Response in Depression and the Role of Nutraceuticals. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:7992. [PMID: 39063234 PMCID: PMC11277518 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Depression continues to be a significant and growing public health concern. In clinical practice, it involves a clinical diagnosis. There is currently no defined or agreed upon biomarker/s for depression that can be readily tested. A biomarker is defined as a biological indicator of normal physiological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention that can be objectively measured and evaluated. Thus, as there is no such marker for depression, there is no objective measure of depression in clinical practice. The discovery of such a biomarker/s would greatly assist clinical practice and potentially lead to an earlier diagnosis of depression and therefore treatment. A biomarker for depression may also assist in determining response to medication. This is of particular importance as not all patients prescribed with medication will respond, which is referred to as medication resistance. The advent of pharmacogenomics in recent years holds promise to target treatment in depression, particularly in cases of medication resistance. The role of pharmacogenomics in routine depression management within clinical practice remains to be fully established. Equally so, the use of pharmaceutical grade nutrients known as nutraceuticals in the treatment of depression in the clinical practice setting is largely unknown, albeit frequently self-prescribed by patients. Whether nutraceuticals have a role in not only depression treatment but also in potentially modifying the biomarkers of depression has yet to be proven. The aim of this review is to highlight the potential biomarkers for the diagnosis, prediction, and medication response of depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Beer
- Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia; (C.B.); (F.R.)
| | - Fiona Rae
- Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia; (C.B.); (F.R.)
| | - Annalese Semmler
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia;
| | - Joanne Voisey
- Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia; (C.B.); (F.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tesfamicael KG, Zhao L, Fernández-Rodríguez R, Adelson DL, Musker M, Polasek TM, Lewis MD. Efficacy and safety of pharmacogenomic-guided antidepressant prescribing in patients with depression: an umbrella review and updated meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1276410. [PMID: 39086729 PMCID: PMC11289719 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1276410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim To determine the efficacy and safety of pharmacogenomics (PGx)-guided antidepressant prescribing in patients with depression through an umbrella review and updated meta-analysis. Methods A comprehensive systematic search was conducted on PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane databases. The pooled effect sizes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were expressed as mean differences for continuous data and risk ratios for noncontinuous data. Results Patients who received PGx-guided medications were 41% to 78% more likely to achieve remission and 20% to 49% more likely to respond to antidepressants than patients receiving treatment-as-usual (TAU). Conclusion PGx-guided antidepressant prescribing improves the treatment of depression. However, the significance and magnitude of the benefit varies widely between studies and different PGx testing panels. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022321324.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiflu G. Tesfamicael
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Lifelong Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Lijun Zhao
- Lifelong Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - David L. Adelson
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Michael Musker
- Adelaide Nursing School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Thomas M. Polasek
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Martin David Lewis
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Lifelong Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maier HB, Borchert A, Neyazi A, Moschny N, Schülke R, Bundies GL, Folsche T, Gaspert A, Seifert J, Bleich S, Scherf-Clavel M, Unterecker S, Deckert J, Frieling H, Weber H. Risk Phenotypes, Comorbidities, Pharmacotherapy, and Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in a Cohort with Difficult-to-Treat Depression in Comparison to an Unmedicated Control Group. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY 2024; 57:191-203. [PMID: 38698605 PMCID: PMC11233224 DOI: 10.1055/a-2292-1438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 15-25% of depressed patients suffer from difficult-to-treat depression (DTD). Patients with DTD require a thorough examination to avoid the oversight of treatable (psychiatric/somatic) comorbidities or (pseudo-)resistance to antidepressant drugs (ADs). Polymorphisms of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes 2D6 and 2C19, which play a major role in the metabolism of ADs, may contribute to resistance to ADs. Patients with DTD might benefit from electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). METHODS We enrolled 109 patients with DTD and 29 untreated depressed controls (UDC). We assessed risk phenotypes, comorbidities, and treatment, including ECT. We also performed pharmacokinetic analyses of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. RESULTS DTD patients significantly more often suffered from comorbid psychiatric diseases, especially ICD-10: F40-F48 (DTD:40.4%, UDC:17.2%, OR 11.87, p=0.011) than UDC patients. DTD patients receiving ECT were more likely to achieve remission (37.7% vs. 11.8%, OR=3.96, p=0.023). Treatment with ADs did not differ between remitters and non-remitters. No significant differences were observed in the distribution of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 variants between both groups. CONCLUSION Patients with DTD appear to experience comorbid neurotic stress and somatoform disorders (ICD-10: F40 - F48) more frequently. Therefore, a comprehensive differential diagnosis is crucial when patients do not respond sufficiently to antidepressant medication. Genotyping CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah B. Maier
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy,
Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Anton Borchert
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy,
Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Alexandra Neyazi
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy,
Hannover Medical School, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Otto von Guericke
University Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Nicole Moschny
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy,
Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Rasmus Schülke
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy,
Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Gabriel L. Bundies
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy,
Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Thorsten Folsche
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy,
Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Anastasia Gaspert
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy,
Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Johanna Seifert
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy,
Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Stefan Bleich
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy,
Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Maike Scherf-Clavel
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Center of
Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Unterecker
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Center of
Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Deckert
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Center of
Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
| | - Helge Frieling
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy,
Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Heike Weber
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Center of
Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Baum ML, Widge AS, Carpenter LL, McDonald WM, Cohen BM, Nemeroff CB. Pharmacogenomic Clinical Support Tools for the Treatment of Depression. Am J Psychiatry 2024; 181:591-607. [PMID: 38685859 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this review, the authors update the 2018 position statement of the American Psychiatric Association Council of Research Workgroup on Biomarkers and Novel Treatments on pharmacogenomic (PGx) tools for treatment selection in depression. METHODS The literature was reviewed for new clinical trials and meta-analyses, published from 2017 to 2022, of studies using PGx tools for treatment selection in depression. The blinding and control conditions, as well as primary and secondary outcomes and post hoc analyses, were summarized. RESULTS Eleven new clinical trials and five meta-analyses were identified; all studies had primary outcome measures related to speed or efficacy of treatment response. Three trials (27%) demonstrated efficacy on the primary outcome measure with statistical significance; the three studies used different PGx tools; one study was open-label and the other two were small single-blind trials. Five trials (45%) did not detect efficacy with statistical significance on either primary or secondary outcome measures. Only one trial (9%) used adverse events as a primary outcome measure. All studies had significant limitations; for example, none adopted a fully blinded study design, only two studies attempted to blind the treating clinician, and none incorporated measures to estimate the effectiveness of the blinds or the influence of lack of blinding on the study results. CONCLUSIONS The addition of these new data do not alter the recommendations of the 2018 report, or the advice of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, that the evidence does not support the use of currently available combinatorial PGx tools for treatment selection in major depressive disorder. Priority efforts for future studies and the development and testing of effective tools include fully blinded study designs, inclusion of promising genetic variants not currently included in any commercially available tests, and investigation of other uses of pharmacogenomics, such as estimating the likelihood of rare adverse drug effects, rather than increasing the speed or magnitude of drug response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Baum
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Baum); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Butler Hospital Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, R.I., and Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Program for Neuropsychiatric Research, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Mass. (Cohen); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Alik S Widge
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Baum); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Butler Hospital Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, R.I., and Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Program for Neuropsychiatric Research, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Mass. (Cohen); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Linda L Carpenter
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Baum); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Butler Hospital Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, R.I., and Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Program for Neuropsychiatric Research, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Mass. (Cohen); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - William M McDonald
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Baum); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Butler Hospital Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, R.I., and Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Program for Neuropsychiatric Research, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Mass. (Cohen); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Bruce M Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Baum); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Butler Hospital Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, R.I., and Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Program for Neuropsychiatric Research, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Mass. (Cohen); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Charles B Nemeroff
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Baum); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Butler Hospital Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, R.I., and Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Program for Neuropsychiatric Research, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Mass. (Cohen); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin (Nemeroff)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cernat A, Samaan Z, Abelson J, Ramdyal A, Shaikh H, Vanstone M. Patient perspectives on pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing for antidepressant prescribing in primary care: a qualitative description study. J Community Genet 2024; 15:293-309. [PMID: 38587601 PMCID: PMC11217204 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00705-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Many patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) try multiple antidepressants before finding one that works well and is tolerable. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing was developed to facilitate more efficacious prescribing. This technology has not been robustly implemented clinically. Patient perspectives are critical to policy decisions, but the views of patients with MDD about the use of PGx testing to guide antidepressant prescribing have not been extensively examined, particularly in publicly funded healthcare systems. The purpose of this qualitative description study was to produce actionable patient perspectives evidence to inform future technology assessment of PGx testing. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 adults with MDD for which antidepressants were indicated in Ontario, Canada, and used the Ontario Decision Determinants Framework to conduct an unconstrained deductive content analysis. Patients expressed views about the overall clinical benefit of PGx testing in depression care, preferences for deployment of testing, perspectives on ethical considerations, opinions about equity and patient care, and beliefs regarding the feasibility of adopting PGx testing into the healthcare system. They also worried about the possibility of conflicts of interest between PGx test manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies. This study provides policymakers with patient priorities to facilitate the development of patient-centred policies. It highlights that formal adoption of PGx testing into the healthcare system requires a focus on equity of access and health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Cernat
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
- Health Policy PhD Program, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Zainab Samaan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Julia Abelson
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Amanada Ramdyal
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Hadia Shaikh
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
- Biomedical Discovery and Commercialization Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Meredith Vanstone
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patel JN, Morris SA, Torres R, Rhead B, Vlangos C, Mueller DJ, Brown LC, Lefkofsky H, Ali M, De La Vega FM, Barnes KC, Zoghbi A, Stanton JD, Badgeley MA. Pharmacogenomic insights in psychiatric care: uncovering novel actionability, allele-specific CYP2D6 copy number variation, and phenoconversion in 15,000 patients. Mol Psychiatry 2024:10.1038/s41380-024-02588-4. [PMID: 38783055 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02588-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Pharmacogenomic testing has emerged as an aid in clinical decision making for psychiatric providers, but more data is needed regarding its utility in clinical practice and potential impact on patient care. In this cross-sectional study, we determined the real-world prevalence of pharmacogenomic actionability in patients receiving psychiatric care. Potential actionability was based on the prevalence of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 phenotypes, including CYP2D6 allele-specific copy number variations (CNVs). Combined actionability additionally incorporated CYP2D6 phenoconversion and the novel CYP2C-TG haplotype in patients with available medication data. Across 15,000 patients receiving clinical pharmacogenomic testing, 65% had potentially actionable CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 phenotypes, and phenotype assignment was impacted by CYP2D6 allele-specific CNVs in 2% of all patients. Of 4114 patients with medication data, 42% had CYP2D6 phenoconversion from drug interactions and 20% carried a novel CYP2C haplotype potentially altering actionability. A total of 87% had some form of potential actionability from genetic findings and/or phenoconversion. Genetic variation detected via next-generation sequencing led to phenotype reassignment in 22% of individuals overall (2% in CYP2D6 and 20% in CYP2C19). Ultimately, pharmacogenomic testing using next-generation sequencing identified potential actionability in most patients receiving psychiatric care. Early pharmacogenomic testing may provide actionable insights to aid clinicians in drug prescribing to optimize psychiatric care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jai N Patel
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology & Pharmacogenomics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Sarah A Morris
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology & Pharmacogenomics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Daniel J Mueller
- Pharmacogenetics Research Clinic, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anthony Zoghbi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ingelman-Sundberg M, Lauschke VM. Individualized Pharmacotherapy Utilizing Genetic Biomarkers and Novel In Vitro Systems As Predictive Tools for Optimal Drug Development and Treatment. Drug Metab Dispos 2024; 52:467-475. [PMID: 38575185 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.123.001302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
In the area of drug development and clinical pharmacotherapy, a profound understanding of the pharmacokinetics and potential adverse reactions associated with the drug under investigation is paramount. Essential to this endeavor is a comprehensive understanding about interindividual variations in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) genetics and the predictive capabilities of in vitro systems, shedding light on metabolite formation and the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Both the domains of pharmacogenomics and the advancement of in vitro systems are experiencing rapid expansion. Here we present an update on these burgeoning fields, providing an overview of their current status and illuminating potential future directions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: There is very rapid development in the area of pharmacogenomics and in vitro systems for predicting drug pharmacokinetics and risk for adverse drug reactions. We provide an update of the current status of pharmacogenomics and developed in vitro systems on these aspects aimed to achieve a better personalized pharmacotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (M.I.-S., V.M.L.); Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany (V.M.L.); and University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (V.M.L.)
| | - Volker M Lauschke
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (M.I.-S., V.M.L.); Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany (V.M.L.); and University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (V.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ghanbarian S, Wong GWK, Bunka M, Edwards L, Cressman S, Conte T, Peterson S, Vijh R, Price M, Schuetz C, Erickson D, Riches L, Landry G, McGrail K, Austin J, Bryan S. A Canadian Simulation Model for Major Depressive Disorder: Study Protocol. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2024; 8:493-505. [PMID: 38528312 PMCID: PMC11058136 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00481-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, often recurrent condition and a significant driver of healthcare costs. People with MDD often receive pharmacological therapy as the first-line treatment, but the majority of people require more than one medication trial to find one that relieves symptoms without causing intolerable side effects. There is an acute need for more effective interventions to improve patients' remission and quality of life and reduce the condition's economic burden on the healthcare system. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing could deliver these objectives, using genomic information to guide prescribing decisions. With an already complex and multifaceted care pathway for MDD, future evaluations of new treatment options require a flexible analytic infrastructure encompassing the entire care pathway. Individual-level simulation models are ideally suited for this purpose. We sought to develop an economic simulation model to assess the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of PGx testing for individuals with major depression. Additionally, the model serves as an analytic infrastructure, simulating the entire patient pathway for those with MDD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Key stakeholders, including patient partners, clinical experts, researchers, and modelers, designed and developed a discrete-time microsimulation model of the clinical pathways of adults with MDD in British Columbia (BC), including all publicly-funded treatment options and multiple treatment steps. The Simulation Model of Major Depression (SiMMDep) was coded with a modular approach to enhance flexibility. The model was populated using multiple original data analyses conducted with BC administrative data, a systematic review, and an expert panel. The model accommodates newly diagnosed and prevalent adult patients with MDD in BC, with and without PGx-guided treatment. SiMMDep comprises over 1500 parameters in eight modules: entry cohort, demographics, disease progression, treatment, adverse events, hospitalization, costs and quality-adjusted life-years (payoff), and mortality. The model predicts health outcomes and estimates costs from a health system perspective. In addition, the model can incorporate interactive decision nodes to address different implementation strategies for PGx testing (or other interventions) along the clinical pathway. We conducted various forms of model validation (face, internal, and cross-validity) to ensure the correct functioning and expected results of SiMMDep. CONCLUSION SiMMDep is Canada's first medication-specific, discrete-time microsimulation model for the treatment of MDD. With patient partner collaboration guiding its development, it incorporates realistic care journeys. SiMMDep synthesizes existing information and incorporates provincially-specific data to predict the benefits and costs associated with PGx testing. These predictions estimate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, resource utilization, and health gains of PGx testing compared with the current standard of care. However, the flexible analytic infrastructure can be adapted to support other policy questions and facilitate the rapid synthesis of new data for a broader search for efficiency improvements in the clinical field of depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahzad Ghanbarian
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Gavin W K Wong
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mary Bunka
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Louisa Edwards
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sonya Cressman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Tania Conte
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sandra Peterson
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rohit Vijh
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Morgan Price
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Christian Schuetz
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David Erickson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Psychology Department, Fraser Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Kim McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Stirling Bryan
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Platona RI, Voiță-Mekeres F, Tudoran C, Tudoran M, Enătescu VR. The Contribution of Genetic Testing in Optimizing Therapy for Patients with Recurrent Depressive Disorder. Clin Pract 2024; 14:703-717. [PMID: 38804388 PMCID: PMC11130888 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14030056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of pharmacogenetic-guided antidepressant therapy on the 12-month evolution of the intensity of depressive symptoms in patients with recurrent depressive disorder (RDD) in comparison to a control group of depressive subjects who were treated conventionally. (2) Methods: This prospective longitudinal study was conducted between 2019 and 2022, and the patients were evaluated by employing the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale: Severity and Improvement. We followed them up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. (3) Results: Of the 76 patients with RDD, 37 were tested genetically (Group A) and 39 were not (Group B). Although the patients from Group A had statistically significantly more severe MDD at baseline than those from Group B (p < 0.001), by adjusting their therapy according to the genetic testing, they had a progressive and more substantial reduction in the severity of RDD symptoms [F = 74.334; η2 = 0.674; p < 0.001], indicating a substantial association with the results provided by the genetic testing (67.4%). (4) Conclusions: In patients with RDD and a poor response to antidepressant therapy, pharmacogenetic testing allows for treatment adjustment, resulting in a constant and superior reduction in the intensity of depression and anxiety symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Ioana Platona
- Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes” Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
- Psychiatry Department, County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Oradea, 410169 Oradea, Romania
| | - Florica Voiță-Mekeres
- Psychiatry Department, County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Oradea, 410169 Oradea, Romania
- Morphological Disciplines Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania
| | - Cristina Tudoran
- Department VII, Internal Medicine II, Discipline of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes” Timisoara, E. Murgu Square, No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (C.T.); (M.T.)
- Center of Molecular Research in Nephrology and Vascular Disease, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes” Timisoara, E. Murgu Square, No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Cardiology Clinic, County Emergency Hospital “Pius Brinzeu”, L. Rebreanu, No. 156, 300723 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Mariana Tudoran
- Department VII, Internal Medicine II, Discipline of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes” Timisoara, E. Murgu Square, No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (C.T.); (M.T.)
- Center of Molecular Research in Nephrology and Vascular Disease, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes” Timisoara, E. Murgu Square, No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Cardiology Clinic, County Emergency Hospital “Pius Brinzeu”, L. Rebreanu, No. 156, 300723 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Virgil Radu Enătescu
- Cardiology Clinic, County Emergency Hospital “Pius Brinzeu”, L. Rebreanu, No. 156, 300723 Timisoara, Romania;
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes” Timisoara, 300041 Timişoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jameson A, Faisal M, Fylan B, Bristow GC, Sohal J, Dalton C, Sagoo GS, Cardno AG, McLean SL. Proportion of Antipsychotics with CYP2D6 Pharmacogenetic (PGx) Associations Prescribed in an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Cohort: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Psychopharmacol 2024; 38:382-394. [PMID: 38494658 PMCID: PMC11010551 DOI: 10.1177/02698811241238283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prescribing drugs for psychosis (antipsychotics) is challenging due to high rates of poor treatment outcomes, which are in part explained by an individual's genetics. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing can help clinicians tailor the choice or dose of psychosis drugs to an individual's genetics, particularly psychosis drugs with known variable response due to CYP2D6 gene variants ('CYP2D6-PGx antipsychotics'). AIMS This study aims to investigate differences between demographic groups prescribed 'CYP2D6-PGx antipsychotics' and estimate the proportion of patients eligible for PGx testing based on current pharmacogenomics guidance. METHODS A cross-sectional study took place extracting data from 243 patients' medical records to explore psychosis drug prescribing, including drug transitions. Demographic data such as age, sex, ethnicity, and clinical sub-team were collected and summarised. Descriptive statistics explored the proportion of 'CYP2D6-PGx antipsychotic' prescribing and the nature of transitions. We used logistic regression analysis to investigate associations between demographic variables and prescription of 'CYP2D6-PGx antipsychotic' versus 'non-CYP2D6-PGx antipsychotic'. RESULTS Two-thirds (164) of patients had been prescribed a 'CYP2D6-PGx antipsychotic' (aripiprazole, risperidone, haloperidol or zuclopenthixol). Over a fifth (23%) of patients would have met the suggested criteria for PGx testing, following two psychosis drug trials. There were no statistically significant differences between age, sex, or ethnicity in the likelihood of being prescribed a 'CYP2D6-PGx antipsychotic'. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated high rates of prescribing 'CYP2D6-PGx-antipsychotics' in an EIP cohort, providing a rationale for further exploration of how PGx testing can be implemented in EIP services to personalise the prescribing of drugs for psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Jameson
- Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
- School of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Muhammad Faisal
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Research Collaboration (YH PSRC), Bradford, UK
| | - Beth Fylan
- School of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
- NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Research Collaboration (YH PSRC), Bradford, UK
| | - Greg C Bristow
- School of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Jaspreet Sohal
- Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Caroline Dalton
- Biomolecular Sciences Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Gurdeep S Sagoo
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Alastair G Cardno
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Samantha L McLean
- School of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Milosavljević F, Molden PE, Ingelman-Sundberg PM, Jukić APMM. Current level of evidence for improvement of antidepressant efficacy and tolerability by pharmacogenomic-guided treatment: A Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2024; 81:43-52. [PMID: 38340605 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess the clinical utility of currently available pharmacogenomic (PGx) tools compared with treatment as usual (TAU), using a meta-analysis of dichotomous and continuous antidepressant efficacy and tolerability data from previously published clinical trials. MEDLINE, clinicaltrial.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, WHO ICTRP and CENTRAL were systematically searched; of the 962 results originally reviewed, 15 trials were included. Antidepressant efficacy was quantified by relative and absolute changes in symptom severity after eight weeks of treatment and by response and remission rates, while tolerability was estimated by the rate of study discontinuation for any reason. In the PGx-guided patients, symptom severity reduced by an average of 31.0% after eight weeks of treatment, compared to an average reduction of 26.8% in the TAU group. Accordingly, PGx-guided patients experienced a greater reduction in symptom severity of 3.4% (95%CI: 1.6-5.3%), which corresponded to a reduction in the Hamilton Depression score of 0.75 (0.30-1.21), a 37% (15-63%) higher remission rate, and an 18% (5-33%) higher response rate compared with TAU patients, while no difference was observed in discontinuation rate between groups. Notably, the majority of associations lost statistical significance when restricting the dataset to low risk of bias studies, while certain funnel plots suggested a potential publication bias favoring the reporting of statistically significant results. In summary, PGx tools marginally enhance antidepressant efficacy, but not antidepressant tolerability; thus, additional research and advancement of PGx tools are needed to improve integration of PGx in clinical pharmacotherapy of depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Milosavljević
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Prof Espen Molden
- Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Section for Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Assoc Prof Marin M Jukić
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Pharmacogenetics Section, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Polasek TM. Pharmacogenomics - a minor rather than major force in clinical medicine. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2024; 17:203-212. [PMID: 38307498 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2024.2314726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is touted as essential for the future of precision medicine. But the opportunity cost of PGx from the prescribers' perspective is rarely considered. The aim of this article is to critique PGx-guided prescribing using clinical pharmacology principles so that important cases for PGx testing are not missed by doctors responsible for therapeutic decision making. AREAS COVERED Three categories of PGx and their limitations are outlined - exposure PGx, response PGx, and immune-mediated safety PGx. Clinical pharmacology reasons are given for the narrow scope of PGx-guided prescribing apart from a few medical specialties. Clinical problems for doctors that may arise from PGx are then explained, including mismatch between patients' expectations of PGx testing and the benefits or answers it provides. EXPERT OPINION Contrary to popular opinion, PGx is unlikely to become the cornerstone of precision medicine. Sound clinical pharmacology reasons explain why PGx-guided prescribing is unnecessary for most drugs. Pharmacogenomics is important for niche areas of prescribing but has limited clinical utility more broadly. The opportunity cost of PGx-guided prescribing is currently too great for most doctors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Polasek
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- CMAX Clinical Research, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Malik S, Verma P, Ruaño G, Al Siaghy A, Dilawar A, Bishop JR, Strawn JR, Namerow LB. Pharmacogenetics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Background and Evidence-Based Clinical Applications. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2024; 34:4-20. [PMID: 38377525 DOI: 10.1089/cap.2023.0074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
The efficacy and tolerability of psychotropic medications can vary significantly among children and adolescents, and some of this variability relates to pharmacogenetic factors. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) in child and adolescent psychiatry can potentially improve treatment outcomes and minimize adverse drug reactions. This article reviews key pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes and principles of pharmacogenetic testing and discusses the evidence base for clinical decision-making concerning PGx testing. This article reviews current guidelines from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), and the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) and explores potential future directions. This review discusses key clinical considerations for clinicians prescribing psychotropic medications in children and adolescents, focusing on antidepressants, antipsychotics, stimulants, norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and alpha-2 agonists. Finally, this review synthesizes the practical use of pharmacogenetic testing and clinical decision support systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Malik
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Pragya Verma
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Gualberto Ruaño
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Areej Al Siaghy
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey R Bishop
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Strawn
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Lisa B Namerow
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pelgrim TAD, Philipsen A, Young AH, Juruena M, Jimenez E, Vieta E, Jukić M, Van der Eycken E, Heilbronner U, Moldovan R, Kas MJH, Jagesar RR, Nöthen MM, Hoffmann P, Shomron N, Kilarski LL, van Amelsvoort T, Campforts B, van Westrhenen R. A New Intervention for Implementation of Pharmacogenetics in Psychiatry: A Description of the PSY-PGx Clinical Study. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:151. [PMID: 38399366 PMCID: PMC10892863 DOI: 10.3390/ph17020151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background Pharmacological treatment for psychiatric disorders has shown to only be effective in about one-third of patients, as it is associated with frequent treatment failure, often because of side effects, and a long process of trial-and-error pharmacotherapy until an effective and tolerable treatment is found. This notion emphasizes the urgency for a personalized medicine approach in psychiatry. (2) Methods This prospective patient- and rater-blinded, randomized, controlled study will investigate the effect of dose-adjustment of antidepressants escitalopram and sertraline or antipsychotics risperidone and aripiprazole according to the latest state-of-the-art international dosing recommendations for CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 metabolizer status in patients with mood, anxiety, and psychotic disorders. A total sample of N = 2500 will be recruited at nine sites in seven countries (expected drop-out rate of 30%). Patients will be randomized to a pharmacogenetic group or a dosing-as-usual group and treated over a 24-week period with four study visits. The primary outcome is personal recovery using the Recovery Assessment Scale as assessed by the patient (RAS-DS), with secondary outcomes including clinical effects (response or symptomatic remission), side effects, general well-being, digital phenotyping, and psychosocial functioning. (3) Conclusions This is, to our knowledge, the first international, multi-center, non-industry-sponsored randomized controlled trial (RCT) that may provide insights into the effectiveness and utility of implementing pharmacogenetic-guided treatment of psychiatric disorders, and as such, results will be incorporated in already available dosing guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teuntje A. D. Pelgrim
- Department of Psychiatry, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, 1062HN Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Philipsen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany
| | - Allan H. Young
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London & South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road Beckenham, Kent BR3 3BX, UK
| | - Mario Juruena
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London & South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road Beckenham, Kent BR3 3BX, UK
| | - Ester Jimenez
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Hospital Clinic & Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, University of Barcelona, 08036 Catalonia, Spain
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Hospital Clinic & Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, University of Barcelona, 08036 Catalonia, Spain
| | - Marin Jukić
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
- Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erik Van der Eycken
- Global Alliance of Mental Illness Advocacy Networks-Europe (GAMIAN-Europe), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Urs Heilbronner
- Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Ramona Moldovan
- Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
- Manchester Center for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Martien J. H. Kas
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, 9700CC Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Raj R. Jagesar
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, 9700CC Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Markus M. Nöthen
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital of Bonn and University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Per Hoffmann
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital of Bonn and University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Noam Shomron
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
| | - Laura L. Kilarski
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany
| | - Thérèse van Amelsvoort
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, 6226NB Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bea Campforts
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, 6226NB Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Roos van Westrhenen
- Department of Psychiatry, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, 1062HN Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London & South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road Beckenham, Kent BR3 3BX, UK
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, 6226NB Maastricht, The Netherlands
- St. John’s National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore 560034, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gareeva AE, Borodina LS, Pozdnyakov SA, Timerbulatov IF. [Pharmacogenomic and pharmacometabolomic biomarkers of the efficacy and safety of antidepressants: focus on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2024; 124:26-35. [PMID: 39072563 DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202412406126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of psychopharmacotherapy with antidepressants is of great medical importance. The search for clinical and biological predictors for choosing the optimal psychopharmacotherapy with antidepressants is actively underway all over the world. Research is mainly devoted to searching for associations of polymorphic gene variants with the efficacy and safety of therapy. However, information about a patient's genetic polymorphism is often insufficient to predict the efficacy and safety of a drug. Modern research on the personalization of pharmacotherapy should include, in addition to genetic, phenotypic biomarkers. This is important because genotyping, for example, cannot accurately predict the actual metabolic activity of an isoenzyme. To personalize therapy, a combination of methods is required to obtain the most complete profile of the efficacy and safety of the drug. Successful treatment of depression remains a challenge, and inter-individual differences in response to antidepressants are common. About half of patients with depressive disorders do not respond to the first attempt at antidepressant therapy. Serious side-effects of antidepressant pharmacotherapy and discontinuation of treatment due to their intolerance are associated with ineffective therapy. This review presents the results of the latest studies of «omics» biomarkers of the efficacy and safety of antidepressants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A E Gareeva
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia
- Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russia
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
| | - L S Borodina
- Republican Narcological Dispensary No. 1, Ufa, Russia
| | - S A Pozdnyakov
- Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Narcology of the Moscow Health Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - I F Timerbulatov
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
- Usoltsev Central Clinical Psychiatric Hospital, Moscow, Russia
- Russian University of Medicine, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Virelli CR, Ebrahimi M, Mohiuddin AG, Tomasi J, Lisoway AJ, Herbert D, Marshe VS, Kidd SA, Ferenbok J, Kennedy JL. User Experiences of Pharmacogenomic Testing and Opinions among Psychiatry Patients. J Pers Med 2023; 14:22. [PMID: 38248723 PMCID: PMC10817619 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Pharmacogenomic testing (PGx) is a tool used to guide physicians in selecting an optimal medication for clients based on their genetic profile. The objective of this qualitative study is to understand patients' experiences with PGx testing as well as their opinions regarding the clinical adoption of such tests in psychiatry. A focus group was conducted to assess the needs of clients who had experience using a PGx test. Participants were recruited from a large study on PGx testing that offered physicians an opportunity to use PGx reports to guide psychotropic prescriptions. The focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and coded using NVivo to identify core themes. A total of 11 people participated in the focus group. Our analysis revealed that many participants were in favour of implementing PGx testing in psychiatric practice, and all expressed important considerations for patient-centred optimization of PGx testing. The main themes captured were: education and awareness among clinicians, cost considerations, PGx results-sharing and accessibility, and prospective benefits. The results of this study suggest that patients are keen to see PGx testing in widespread clinical care, but they report important opportunities to improve knowledge mobilization of PGx testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R. Virelli
- Tanenbaum Centre for Pharmacogenetics, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada (M.E.); (J.T.)
- Translational Research Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Mahbod Ebrahimi
- Tanenbaum Centre for Pharmacogenetics, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada (M.E.); (J.T.)
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Ayeshah G. Mohiuddin
- Tanenbaum Centre for Pharmacogenetics, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada (M.E.); (J.T.)
- Translational Research Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Julia Tomasi
- Tanenbaum Centre for Pharmacogenetics, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada (M.E.); (J.T.)
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Amanda J. Lisoway
- Tanenbaum Centre for Pharmacogenetics, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada (M.E.); (J.T.)
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Deanna Herbert
- Tanenbaum Centre for Pharmacogenetics, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada (M.E.); (J.T.)
| | | | - Sean A. Kidd
- Tanenbaum Centre for Pharmacogenetics, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada (M.E.); (J.T.)
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Joseph Ferenbok
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - James L. Kennedy
- Tanenbaum Centre for Pharmacogenetics, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada (M.E.); (J.T.)
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kosaski DL, Cole KC, Wright JA, El Melik RM, Kung S, Nicholson WT, Leung JG. Impact of sex on antidepressant discontinuation in groups of similar cytochrome P450 phenotypes. Ment Health Clin 2023; 13:303-310. [PMID: 38058598 PMCID: PMC10696171 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.12.303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although there are studies assessing reasons for antidepressant discontinuation, little is known about the impact of sex differences or cytochrome P450 phenotypes. Our objective is to assess discontinuation rates between males and females and whether CYP450 phenotype influences discontinuation. Methods This is a retrospective review of patients previously enrolled in the Right Drug, Right Dose, Right Time: Using Genomic Data to Individualize Treatment database with major depressive disorder. Patients were evaluated for antidepressants trialed between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2019. Survival analyses with competing risks were used to analyze discontinuation reasons. A Kaplan-Meier estimation method was used to assess the time to discontinuation and discontinuation rates. Analyses were also completed to assess discontinuation between men and women by phenotypic groups. All tests were two-sided, and p-values ≤ .05 were considered statistically significant. Results There were 620 antidepressant discontinuation events discovered from 1015 antidepressant trials included. Overall, the median time to discontinuation for males was 2.6 years and 1.9 years for females (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80, 1.19], p = .77). The risk of discontinuation was not different between males and females in any of the phenotype groups, which was consistent in the multivariable analyses. Concomitant use of medications that inhibited or induced antidepressant metabolism increased the overall risk of discontinuation (HR 1.45, 95% CI [1.06, 1.99], p = .020) in a time-dependent analysis. Discussion We did not detect a significant difference in risk of antidepressant discontinuation rates between males and females even when accounting for cytochrome P450 phenotype. Future studies should account for whether medications that inhibit or induce antidepressant metabolism may be a crucial factor in antidepressant discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan L Kosaski
- Pharmacist, Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kristin C Cole
- Statistician, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jessica A Wright
- Pharmacist, Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Razan M El Melik
- Pharmacist, Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Simon Kung
- Psychiatrist, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Wayne T Nicholson
- Physician, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jonathan G Leung
- Pharmacist, Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Statistician, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Pharmacist, Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Pharmacist, Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Psychiatrist, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Physician, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bousman CA, Maruf AA, Marques DF, Brown LC, Müller DJ. The emergence, implementation, and future growth of pharmacogenomics in psychiatry: a narrative review. Psychol Med 2023; 53:7983-7993. [PMID: 37772416 PMCID: PMC10755240 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291723002817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Psychotropic medication efficacy and tolerability are critical treatment issues faced by individuals with psychiatric disorders and their healthcare providers. For some people, it can take months to years of a trial-and-error process to identify a medication with the ideal efficacy and tolerability profile. Current strategies (e.g. clinical practice guidelines, treatment algorithms) for addressing this issue can be useful at the population level, but often fall short at the individual level. This is, in part, attributed to interindividual variation in genes that are involved in pharmacokinetic (i.e. absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination) and pharmacodynamic (e.g. receptors, signaling pathways) processes that in large part, determine whether a medication will be efficacious or tolerable. A precision prescribing strategy know as pharmacogenomics (PGx) assesses these genomic variations, and uses it to inform selection and dosing of certain psychotropic medications. In this review, we describe the path that led to the emergence of PGx in psychiatry, the current evidence base and implementation status of PGx in the psychiatric clinic, and finally, the future growth potential of precision psychiatry via the convergence of the PGx-guided strategy with emerging technologies and approaches (i.e. pharmacoepigenomics, pharmacomicrobiomics, pharmacotranscriptomics, pharmacoproteomics, pharmacometabolomics) to personalize treatment of psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad A. Bousman
- The Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Departments of Physiology and Pharmacology, and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- AB Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Abdullah Al Maruf
- The Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
- College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | | | | - Daniel J. Müller
- Pharmacogenetics Research Clinic, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Center of Mental Health, University Hospital of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Leung JG. Ethnopsychopharmacology: Clinical and scientific writing pearls. Ment Health Clin 2023; 13:276-288. [PMID: 38058595 PMCID: PMC10696167 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.12.276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The concept of ethnopsychopharmacology aims to predict or explain the pharmacologic response to psychiatric medications based on the influence of biologic and nonbiologic factors. Interactions involving these factors are complex and influence patient outcomes in health care. Pharmacists and other clinicians working in patient care environments, research, or medical education should engage in lifelong learning to enhance ethnopsychopharmacologic knowledge gaps, which ultimately may improve and individualize care across diverse populations. Through two cases, this paper provides pearls on how biogeographical ancestry and cytochrome P450 status may influence pharmacotherapy selection, dosing, or response. A third scenario highlights a publication, like many other published works, with deficiencies in how data on ancestry, race, and ethnicity are collected or reported. Current recommendations on the use of inclusive language in scientific writing are reviewed, with attention to specific examples.
Collapse
|
24
|
Ghanbarian S, Wong GWK, Bunka M, Edwards L, Cressman S, Conte T, Price M, Schuetz C, Riches L, Landry G, Erickson D, McGrail K, Peterson S, Vijh R, Hoens AM, Austin J, Bryan S. Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided treatment for major depression. CMAJ 2023; 195:E1499-E1508. [PMID: 37963621 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.221785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacogenomic testing to identify variations in genes that influence metabolism of antidepressant medications can enhance efficacy and reduce adverse effects of pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder. We sought to establish the cost-effectiveness of implementing pharmacogenomic testing to guide prescription of antidepressants. METHODS We developed a discrete-time microsimulation model of care pathways for major depressive disorder in British Columbia, Canada, to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic testing from the public payer's perspective over 20 years. The model included unique patient characteristics (e.g., metabolizer phenotypes) and used estimates derived from systematic reviews, analyses of administrative data (2015-2020) and expert judgment. We estimated incremental costs, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for a representative cohort of patients with major depressive disorder in BC. RESULTS Pharmacogenomic testing, if implemented in BC for adult patients with moderate-severe major depressive disorder, was predicted to save the health system $956 million ($4926 per patient) and bring health gains of 0.064 life-years and 0.381 QALYs per patient (12 436 life-years and 74 023 QALYs overall over 20 yr). These savings were mainly driven by slowing or avoiding the transition to refractory (treatment-resistant) depression. Pharmacogenomic-guided care was associated with 37% fewer patients with refractory depression over 20 years. Sensitivity analyses estimated that costs of pharmacogenomic testing would be offset within about 2 years of implementation. INTERPRETATION Pharmacogenomic testing to guide antidepressant use was estimated to yield population health gains while substantially reducing health system costs. These findings suggest that pharmacogenomic testing offers health systems an opportunity for a major value-promoting investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahzad Ghanbarian
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Gavin W K Wong
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Mary Bunka
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Louisa Edwards
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sonya Cressman
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Tania Conte
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Morgan Price
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Christian Schuetz
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Linda Riches
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Ginny Landry
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - David Erickson
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Kim McGrail
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sandra Peterson
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Rohit Vijh
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Alison M Hoens
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Jehannine Austin
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Stirling Bryan
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Barlati S, Minelli A, Nibbio G, Bertoni L, Necchini N, Paolini S, Muscarella A, Ubertino UB, Calzavara-Pinton I, Vita A, Gennarelli M. The role of pharmacogenetics in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a critical review. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1307473. [PMID: 38025425 PMCID: PMC10667493 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1307473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmacological therapy represents one of the essential approaches to treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). However, currently available antidepressant medications show high rates of first-level treatment non-response, and several attempts are often required to find an effective molecule for a specific patient in clinical practice. In this context, pharmacogenetic analyses could represent a valuable tool to identify appropriate pharmacological treatment quickly and more effectively. However, the usefulness and the practical effectiveness of pharmacogenetic testing currently remains an object of scientific debate. The present narrative and critical review focuses on exploring the available evidence supporting the usefulness of pharmacogenetic testing for the treatment of MDD in clinical practice, highlighting both the points of strength and the limitations of the available studies and of currently used tests. Future research directions and suggestions to improve the quality of available evidence, as well as consideration on the potential use of pharmacogenetic tests in everyday clinical practice are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Barlati
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandra Minelli
- Genetics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gabriele Nibbio
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bertoni
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Nicola Necchini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Paolini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessia Muscarella
- Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ughetta Bosco Ubertino
- Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Vita
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Massimo Gennarelli
- Genetics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nogueiras-Álvarez R. Pharmacogenomics in clinical trials: an overview. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1247088. [PMID: 37927590 PMCID: PMC10625420 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1247088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
With the trend towards promoting personalised medicine (PM), the application of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics (PGx) is of growing importance. For the purposes of clinical trials, the inclusion of PGx is an additional tool that should be considered for improving our knowledge about the effectiveness and safety of new drugs. A search of available clinical trials containing pharmacogenetic and PGx information was conducted on ClinicalTrials.gov. The results show there has been an increase in the number of trials containing PGx information since the 2000 s, with particular relevance in the areas of Oncology (28.43%) and Mental Health (10.66%). Most of the clinical trials focus on treatment as their primary purpose. In those clinical trials entries where the specific genes considered for study are detailed, the most frequently explored genes are CYP2D6 (especially in Mental Health and Pain), CYP2C9 (in Hematology), CYP2C19 (in Cardiology and Mental Health) and ABCB1 and CYP3A5 (particularly prominent in Transplantation and Cardiology), among others. Researchers and clinicans should be trained in pharmacogenetics and PGx in order to be able to make a proper interpretation of this data, contributing to better prescribing decisions and an improvement in patients' care, which would lead to the performance of PM.
Collapse
|
27
|
Forbes M, Hopwood M, Bousman CA. CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 Variant Coverage of Commercial Antidepressant Pharmacogenomic Testing Panels Available in Victoria, Australia. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:1945. [PMID: 37895294 PMCID: PMC10606650 DOI: 10.3390/genes14101945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing to inform antidepressant medication selection and dosing is gaining attention from healthcare professionals, patients, and payors in Australia. However, there is often uncertainty regarding which test is most suitable for a particular patient. Here, we identified and evaluated the coverage of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 variants in commercial antidepressant PGx testing panels in Victoria, a large and ethnically diverse state of Australia. Test characteristics and star alleles tested for both genes were obtained directly from pathology laboratories offering PGx testing and compared against the Association of Molecular Pathology's recommended minimum (Tier 1) and extended (Tier 2) allele sets. Although all tests covered the minimum recommended alleles for CYP2C19, this was not the case for CYP2D6. This study emphasizes that PGx tests might not be suitable for all individuals in Australia due to the limited range of star alleles assessed. Inadequate haplotype coverage may risk misclassification of an individual's predicted metabolizer phenotype, which has ramifications for depression medication selection and dosage. This study underscores the urgent need for greater standardization in PGx testing and emphasizes the importance of considering genetic ancestry when choosing a PGx testing panel to ensure optimal clinical applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm Forbes
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia; (M.H.); (C.A.B.)
| | - Mal Hopwood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia; (M.H.); (C.A.B.)
| | - Chad A. Bousman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia; (M.H.); (C.A.B.)
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Polasek TM. Virtual twin for healthcare management. Front Digit Health 2023; 5:1246659. [PMID: 37781454 PMCID: PMC10540783 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1246659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Healthcare is increasingly fragmented, resulting in escalating costs, patient dissatisfaction, and sometimes adverse clinical outcomes. Strategies to decrease healthcare fragmentation are therefore attractive from payer and patient perspectives. In this commentary, a patient-centered smart phone application called Virtual Twin for Healthcare Management (VTHM) is proposed, including its organizational layout, basic functionality, and potential clinical applications. The platform features a virtual twin hub that displays the body and its health data. This is a physiologically based human model that is "virtualized" for the patient based on their unique genetic, molecular, physiological, and disease characteristics. The spokes of the system are a full service and interoperable electronic-health record, accessible to healthcare providers with permission on any device with internet access. Theoretical case studies based on real scenarios are presented to show how VTHM could potentially improve patient care and clinical efficiency. Challenges that must be overcome to turn VTHM into reality are also briefly outlined. Notably, the VTHM platform is designed to operationalize current and future precision medicine initiatives, such as access to molecular diagnostic results, pharmacogenomics-guided prescribing, and model-informed precision dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M. Polasek
- Certara, Princeton, NJ, United States
- Centre for Medicines Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Soda T, Merner AR, Small BJ, Torgerson LN, Muñoz K, Austin J, Storch EA, Pereira S, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Child and adolescent psychiatrists' use, attitudes, and understanding of genetic testing and pharmacogenetics in clinical practice. Psychiatry Res 2023; 325:115246. [PMID: 37172398 PMCID: PMC10365566 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to report current practices and attitudes of child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAP) regarding diagnostic genetic and pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing. We surveyed 958 US-based practicing CAP. 54.9% of respondents indicated that they had ordered/referred for a genetic test in the past 12 months. 87% of respondents agreed that it is their role to discuss genetic information regarding psychiatric conditions with their patients; however, 45% rated their knowledge of genetic testing practice guidelines as poor/very poor. The most ordered test was PGx (32.2%), followed by chromosomal microarray (23.0%). 73.4% reported that PGx is at least slightly useful in child and adolescent psychiatry. Most (62.8%) were asked by a patient/family to order PGx in the past 12 months and 41.7% reported they would order PGx in response to a family request. Those who ordered a PGx test were more likely to have been asked by a patient/family and to work in private practice. 13.8% of respondents agreed/strongly agreed that a PGx test can predict the effectiveness of specific antidepressants. Some respondents also indicated they would make clinical changes based on PGx information even if a medication was currently effective and there were no side effects. Genetic testing has become routine clinical care in child and adolescent psychiatry. Despite this, many providers rate their associated knowledge as poor/very poor. Patient requests were associated with ordering practices and providers misinterpretation of PGx may be leading to unnecessary changes in clinical management. There is need for further education and support for clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Soda
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; Center for Autism and Neurodevelopment, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Amanda R Merner
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | | | - Katrina Muñoz
- School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Eric A Storch
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics & Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bousman CA, Stevenson JM, Ramsey LB, Sangkuhl K, Kevin Hicks J, Strawn JR, Singh AB, Ruaño G, Mueller DJ, Tsermpini EE, Brown JT, Bell GC, Steven Leeder J, Gaedigk A, Scott SA, Klein TE, Caudle KE, Bishop JR. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2B6, SLC6A4, and HTR2A Genotypes and Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressants. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 114:51-68. [PMID: 37032427 PMCID: PMC10564324 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 82.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
Serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; i.e., citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (i.e., desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran, and venlafaxine), and serotonin modulators with SSRI-like properties (i.e., vilazodone and vortioxetine) are primary pharmacologic treatments for major depressive and anxiety disorders. Genetic variation in CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2B6 influences the metabolism of many of these antidepressants, which may potentially affect dosing, efficacy, and tolerability. In addition, the pharmacodynamic genes SLC6A4 (serotonin transporter) and HTR2A (serotonin-2A receptor) have been examined in relation to efficacy and side effect profiles of these drugs. This guideline updates and expands the 2015 Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and SSRI dosing and summarizes the impact of CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2B6, SLC6A4, and HTR2A genotypes on antidepressant dosing, efficacy, and tolerability. We provide recommendations for using CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2B6 genotype results to help inform prescribing these antidepressants and describe the existing data for SLC6A4 and HTR2A, which do not support their clinical use in antidepressant prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad A. Bousman
- Departments of Medical Genetics, Psychiatry, Physiology & Pharmacology, and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - James M. Stevenson
- Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laura B. Ramsey
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Divisions of Clinical Pharmacology and Research in Patient Services, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Katrin Sangkuhl
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - J. Kevin Hicks
- Department of Individualized Cancer Management, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jeffrey R. Strawn
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Divisions of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Clinical Pharmacology Cincinnati, Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ajeet B. Singh
- School of Medicine, IMPACT Institute, Deakin University, Australia
| | - Gualberto Ruaño
- Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Daniel J. Mueller
- Pharmacogenetics Research Clinic, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Evangelia Eirini Tsermpini
- Pharmacogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jacob T. Brown
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Duluth, MN, USA
| | | | - J. Steven Leeder
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology & Therapeutic Innovation, Children’s Mercy Research Institute (CMRI), Kansas City, MO, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Andrea Gaedigk
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology & Therapeutic Innovation, Children’s Mercy Research Institute (CMRI), Kansas City, MO, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Stuart A. Scott
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Stanford Medicine Clinical Genomics Program, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Teri E. Klein
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kelly E. Caudle
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jeffrey R. Bishop
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
The field of psychiatry is facing an important paradigm shift in the provision of clinical care and mental health service organization toward personalization and integration of multimodal data science. This approach, termed precision psychiatry, aims at identifying subgroups of patients more prone to the development of a certain phenotype, such as symptoms or severe mental disorders (risk detection), and/or to guide treatment selection. Pharmacogenomics and computational psychiatry are two fundamental tools of precision psychiatry, which have seen increasing levels of integration in clinical settings. Here we present a brief overview of these two applications of precision psychiatry in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirko Manchia
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, 09127, Italy
- Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, University Hospital Agency of Cagliari, Cagliari, 09127,Italy
- Department of Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Martino Belvederi Murri
- Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, 44121, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brown LC, Bobo WV, Gall CA, Müller DJ, Bousman CA. Pharmacomicrobiomics of Antidepressants in Depression: A Systematic Review. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1086. [PMID: 37511699 PMCID: PMC10381387 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
This systematic review evaluated the animal and human evidence for pharmacomicrobiomics (PMx) interactions of antidepressant medications. Studies of gut microbiota effects on functional and behavioral effects of antidepressants in human and animal models were identified from PubMed up to December 2022. Risk of bias was assessed, and results are presented as a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 28 (21 animal, 7 human) studies were included in the review. The reviewed papers converged on three themes: (1) Antidepressants can alter the composition and metabolites of gut microbiota, (2) gut microbiota can alter the bioavailability of certain antidepressants, and (3) gut microbiota may modulate the clinical or modeled mood modifying effects of antidepressants. The majority (n = 22) of studies had at least moderate levels of bias present. While strong evidence is still lacking to understand the clinical role of antidepressant PMx in human health, there is evidence for interactions among antidepressants, microbiota changes, microbiota metabolite changes, and behavior. Well-controlled studies of the mediating and moderating effects of baseline and treatment-emergent changes in microbiota on therapeutic and adverse responses to antidepressants are needed to better establish a potential role of PMx in personalizing antidepressant treatment selection and response prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa C Brown
- Great Scott! Consulting LLC, New York, NY 11222, USA
| | - William V Bobo
- Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Cory A Gall
- Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort 0028, South Africa
| | - Daniel J Müller
- Pharmacogenetics Research Clinic, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Center of Mental Health, University Hospital of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Chad A Bousman
- The Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- Departments of Medical Genetics, Psychiatry, Physiology and Pharmacology, and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Morris SA, Nguyen DG, Patel JN. Pharmacogenomics in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Implications on supportive therapies and conditioning regimens. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2023; 36:101470. [PMID: 37353294 DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2023.101470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation mortality has declined over the years, though prevention and management of treatment-related toxicities and post-transplant complications remains challenging. Applications of pharmacogenomic testing can potentially mitigate adverse drug outcomes due to interindividual variability in drug metabolism and response. This review summarizes clinical pharmacogenomic applications relevant to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, including antifungals, immunosuppressants, and supportive care management, as well as emerging pharmacogenomic evidence with conditioning regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Morris
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology & Pharmacogenomics Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, 1021 Morehead Medical Drive, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
| | - D Grace Nguyen
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology & Pharmacogenomics Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, 1021 Morehead Medical Drive, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
| | - Jai N Patel
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology & Pharmacogenomics Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, 1021 Morehead Medical Drive, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Saya S, Chondros P, Abela A, Mihalopolous C, Chatterton ML, Gunn J, Chen TF, Polasek TM, Dettmann E, Brooks R, King M, Spencer L, Alphonse P, Milton S, Ramsay G, Siviour Z, Liew J, Ly P, Thoenig M, Seychell R, La Rocca F, Hesson LB, Mejias N, Sivertsen T, Galea MA, Bousman C, Emery J. The PRESIDE (PhaRmacogEnomicS In DEpression) Trial: a double-blind randomised controlled trial of pharmacogenomic-informed prescribing of antidepressants on depression outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder in primary care. Trials 2023; 24:342. [PMID: 37208772 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07361-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence for the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is growing, and guidelines exist for the use of PGx testing to inform prescribing of 13 antidepressants. Although previous randomised controlled trials of PGx testing for antidepressant prescribing have shown an association with remission of depression in clinical psychiatric settings, few trials have focused on the primary care setting, where most antidepressant prescribing occurs. METHODS The PRESIDE Trial is a stratified double-blinded randomised controlled superiority trial that aims to evaluate the impact of a PGx-informed antidepressant prescribing report (compared with standard prescribing using the Australian Therapeutic Guidelines) on depressive symptoms after 12 weeks, when delivered in primary care. Six hundred seventy-two patients aged 18-65 years of general practitioners (GPs) in Victoria with moderate to severe depressive symptoms, measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), will be randomly allocated 1:1 to each arm using a computer-generated sequence. Participants and GPs will be blinded to the study arm. The primary outcome is a difference between arms in the change of depressive symptoms, measured using the PHQ-9 after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include a difference between the arms in change in PHQ-9 score at 4, 8 and 26 weeks, proportion in remission at 12 weeks, a change in side effect profile of antidepressant medications, adherence to antidepressant medications, change in quality of life and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. DISCUSSION This trial will provide evidence as to whether PGx-informed antidepressant prescribing is clinically efficacious and cost-effective. It will inform national and international policy and guidelines about the use of PGx to select antidepressants for people with moderate to severe depressive symptoms presenting in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12621000181808. Registered on 22 February 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibel Saya
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Patty Chondros
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anastasia Abela
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopolous
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Health Economics Group, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mary Lou Chatterton
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Health Economics Group, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jane Gunn
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Timothy F Chen
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Thomas M Polasek
- , Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elise Dettmann
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rachel Brooks
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michelle King
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Luke Spencer
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Pavithran Alphonse
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shakira Milton
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Georgia Ramsay
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Zoe Siviour
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jamie Liew
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Philip Ly
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthew Thoenig
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Raushaan Seychell
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Floriana La Rocca
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Luke B Hesson
- Genetics Department, Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sonic Healthcare, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Terri Sivertsen
- Genetics Department, Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sonic Healthcare, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Melanie Anne Galea
- Genetics Department, Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sonic Healthcare, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Chad Bousman
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jon Emery
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pharmacokinetic Markers of Clinical Outcomes in Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24054776. [PMID: 36902205 PMCID: PMC10003720 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The term severe mental illness (SMI) encompasses those psychiatric disorders exerting the highest clinical burden and socio-economic impact on the affected individuals and their communities. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) approaches hold great promise in personalizing treatment selection and clinical outcomes, possibly reducing the burden of SMI. Here, we sought to review the literature in the field, focusing on PGx testing and particularly on pharmacokinetic markers. We performed a systematic review on PUBMED/Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus. The last search was performed on the 17 September 2022, and further augmented with a comprehensive pearl-growing strategy. In total, 1979 records were screened, and after duplicate removal, 587 unique records were screened by at least 2 independent reviewers. Ultimately, forty-two articles were included in the qualitative analysis, eleven randomized controlled trials and thirty-one nonrandomized studies. The observed lack of standardization in PGx tests, population selection, and tested outcomes limit the overall interpretation of the available evidence. A growing body of evidence suggests that PGx testing might be cost-effective in specific settings and may modestly improve clinical outcomes. More efforts need to be directed toward improving PGx standardization, knowledge for all stakeholders, and clinical practice guidelines for screening recommendations.
Collapse
|
36
|
Bunka M, Wong G, Kim D, Edwards L, Austin J, Doyle-Waters MM, Gaedigk A, Bryan S. Evaluating treatment outcomes in pharmacogenomic-guided care for major depression: A rapid review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res 2023; 321:115102. [PMID: 36780865 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing may increase the probability of remission and response in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) undergoing pharmacotherapy. Given the potential implications of these outcomes and recent proliferation of PGx studies, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of PGx testing on clinical outcomes in patients with MDD as compared to treatment as usual (TAU). MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, and CENTRAL were searched for English-language articles from 2000 to 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PGx-guided treatment vs. TAU in patients with MDD. Meta-analyses were conducted in R. Ten RCTs were included: eight reported remission and seven reported response. The best available evidence suggests that PGx-guided care for moderate-to-severe adult depression is more likely to result in remission and response than TAU (both risk ratios significant). However, there are limitations in the evidence base, including high risk of bias and inconsistency between trials. Despite the consequent very low certainty in the magnitude of effect, there is confidence in the direction. Though modest, the beneficial effects of PGx for adults with moderate-severe MDD could - as a result of the scope and scale of the condition and its impacts - have important ramifications for patients and the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Bunka
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, 7th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gavin Wong
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, 7th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Dan Kim
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, 7th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Louisa Edwards
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, 7th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jehannine Austin
- BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute, UBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mary M Doyle-Waters
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrea Gaedigk
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology & Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Stirling Bryan
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, 7th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Crowley JJ. Genomics of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Related Disorders: What the Clinician Needs to Know. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2023; 46:39-51. [PMID: 36740354 DOI: 10.1016/j.psc.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
A wealth of evidence has shown that genetics plays a major role in susceptibility to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and all of its related disorders. Several large-scale, collaborative efforts using modern genomic methods are beginning to reveal the genetic architecture of these traits and identify long-sought risk genes. In this article, we summarize current OCD and related disorder genomic knowledge and explain how to communicate this information to patients and their families. The article concludes with a discussion of how genomic discovery in OCD and related disorders can inform our understanding of disease etiology and provide novel targets for therapeutic development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Crowley
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Soda T, Merner AR, Small BJ, Torgerson LN, Muñoz K, Austin J, Storch EA, Pereira S, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists' Use, Attitudes, and Understanding of Genetic Tests in Clinical Practice. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.01.24.23284953. [PMID: 36747629 PMCID: PMC9901070 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.24.23284953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Objective To report current practices and attitudes of child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAP) regarding diagnostic genetic and pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing. Methods Survey of 958 US-based practicing CAP. Results 54.9% of respondents indicated that they had ordered/referred for a genetic test in the past 12 months. 87% of respondents agreed that it is their role to discuss genetic information regarding psychiatric conditions with their patients; however, 45% rated their knowledge of genetic testing practice guidelines as poor/very poor. The most ordered test was PGx (32.2%), followed by chromosomal microarray (23.0%). 73.4% reported that PGx is at least slightly useful in child and adolescent psychiatry. Most (62.8%) were asked by a patient/family to order PGx in the past 12 months and 41.7% reported they would order PGx in response to a family request. Those who ordered a PGx test were more likely to have been asked by a patient/family and to work in private practice. 13.8% of respondents agreed/strongly agreed that a PGx test can predict the effectiveness of specific antidepressants. Some respondents also indicated they would make clinical changes based on PGx information even if a medication was currently effective and there were no side effects. Conclusions Genetic testing has become routine clinical care in child and adolescent psychiatry. Despite this, many providers rate their associated knowledge as poor/very poor. Patient requests were associated with ordering practices and providers misinterpretation of PGx may be leading to unnecessary changes in clinical management. There is need for further education and support for clinicians.
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Inter-individual variability in drug response, be it efficacy or safety, is common and likely to become an increasing problem globally given the growing elderly population requiring treatment. Reasons for this inter-individual variability include genomic factors, an area of study called pharmacogenomics. With genotyping technologies now widely available and decreasing in cost, implementing pharmacogenomics into clinical practice - widely regarded as one of the initial steps in mainstreaming genomic medicine - is currently a focus in many countries worldwide. However, major challenges of implementation lie at the point of delivery into health-care systems, including the modification of current clinical pathways coupled with a massive knowledge gap in pharmacogenomics in the health-care workforce. Pharmacogenomics can also be used in a broader sense for drug discovery and development, with increasing evidence suggesting that genomically defined targets have an increased success rate during clinical development.
Collapse
|
40
|
Kee PS, Maggo SDS, Kennedy MA, Chin PKL. The pharmacogenetics of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 in a case series of antidepressant responses. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1080117. [PMID: 36895946 PMCID: PMC9988947 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1080117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmacogenetics has potential for optimizing use of psychotropics. CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 are two clinically relevant pharmacogenes in the prescribing of antidepressants. Using cases recruited from the Understanding Drug Reactions Using Genomic Sequencing (UDRUGS) study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of genotyping CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 in antidepressant response. Genomic and clinical data for patients who were prescribed antidepressants for mental health disorders, and experienced adverse reactions (ADRs) or ineffectiveness, were extracted for analysis. Genotype-inferred phenotyping of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 was carried out as per Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines. A total of 52 patients, predominantly New Zealand Europeans (85%) with a median age (range) of 36 years (15-73), were eligible for analysis. Thirty-one (60%) reported ADRs, 11 (21%) ineffectiveness, and 10 (19%) reported both. There were 19 CYP2C19 NMs, 15 IMs, 16 RMs, one PM and one UM. For CYP2D6, there were 22 NMs, 22 IMs, four PMs, three UMs, and one indeterminate. CPIC assigned a level to each gene-drug pair based on curated genotype-to-phenotype evidence. We analyzed a subgroup of 45 cases, inclusive of response type (ADRs/ineffectiveness). Seventy-nine (N = 37 for CYP2D6, N = 42 for CYP2C19) gene-drug/antidepressant-response pairs with CPIC evidence levels of A, A/B, or B were identified. Pairs were assigned as 'actionable' if the CYP phenotypes potentially contributed to the observed response. We observed actionability in 41% (15/37) of CYP2D6-antidepressant-response pairs and 36% (15/42) of CYP2C19-antidepressant-response pairs. In this cohort, CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes were actionable for a total of 38% pairs, consisting of 48% in relation to ADRs and 21% in relation to drug ineffectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Siu Kee
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Simran D S Maggo
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.,Department of Pathology, Center for Personalized Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Martin A Kennedy
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Paul K L Chin
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Slomp C, Morris E, Edwards L, Hoens AM, Landry G, Riches L, Ridgway L, Bryan S, Austin J. Pharmacogenomic Testing for Major Depression: A Qualitative Study of the Perceptions of People with Lived Experience and Professional Stakeholders. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2022:7067437221140383. [PMID: 36437757 DOI: 10.1177/07067437221140383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES With increasing evidence for the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing for depression, there is a growing need to consider issues related to the clinical implementation of this testing. The perspectives of key stakeholders (both people with lived experience [PWLE] and providers) are critical, but not frequently explored. The purpose of this study was to understand how PWLE and healthcare providers/policy experts (P/HCPs) perceive PGx testing for depression, to inform the consideration of clinical implementation within the healthcare system in British Columbia (BC), Canada. METHODS We recruited two cohorts of participants to complete individual 1-h, semi-structured interviews: (a) PWLE, recruited from patient and research engagement networks and organizations and (b) P/HCPs, recruited via targeted invitation. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, de-identified, and analysed using interpretive description. RESULTS Seventeen interviews were completed with PWLE (7 with experience of PGx testing for depression; 10 without); 15 interviews were completed with P/HCPs (family physicians, psychiatrists, nurses, pharmacists, genetic counsellors, medical geneticists, lab technologists, program directors, and insurers). Visual models of PWLE's and P/HCP's perceptions of and attitudes towards PGx testing were developed separately, but both were heavily influenced by participants' prior professional and/or personal experiences with depression and/or PGx testing. Both groups expressed a need for evidence and numerous considerations for the implementation of PGx testing in BC, including the requirement for conclusive economic analyses, patient and provider education, technological and clinical support, local testing facilities, and measures to ensure equitable access to testing. CONCLUSIONS While hopeful about the potential for therapeutic benefit from PGx testing, PWLE and P/HCPs see the need for robust evidence of utility, and BC-wide infrastructure and policies to ensure equitable and effective access to PGx testing. Further research into the accessibility, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of various implementation strategies is needed to inform PGx testing use in BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Slomp
- Department of Psychiatry, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Emily Morris
- Department of Psychiatry, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Louisa Edwards
- School of Population & Public Health, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Alison M Hoens
- Department of Physical Therapy, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Stirling Bryan
- School of Population & Public Health, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Department of Psychiatry, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rates of Divergent Pharmacogenes in a Psychiatric Cohort of Inpatients with Depression-Arguments for Preemptive Testing. J Xenobiot 2022; 12:317-328. [PMID: 36412766 PMCID: PMC9680514 DOI: 10.3390/jox12040022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The international drug agencies annotate pharmacogenes for many years. Pharmacogenetic testing is thus far only established in few settings, assuming that only few patients are actually affected by drug-gene interactions. Methods: 108 hospitalized patients with major depressive disorder were genotyped for CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, NAT2, DPYD; VKORC1 and TMTP. Results: We found 583 (mean 5.4, median 5) divergent phenotypes (i.e., divergent from the common phenotypes considered normal, e.g., extensive metabolizer) in the 12 analyzed pharmacokinetic genes. The rate for at least one divergent phenotype was 100% in our cohort for CYP, but also for all 12 important pharmacogenes: patients had at least two divergent phenotypes. Compared to a large Danish cohort, CYP2C9 NM and IM status, CYP2C19 UM, CYP2D6 UM and DYPD (GAS 0, 1, 2) genotypes differed statistical significantly. For CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, 13% of the patients were normal metabolizers for both enzymes in our cohort, but this value was 27.3% in the Danish cohort, which is a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Divergent phenotypes in pharmacogenes are not the exception, but the rule. Patients with divergent phenotypes seem more prone for hospitalization, emphasizing the need for pre-emptive testing to avoid inefficacy and adverse drug effects in all patients.
Collapse
|