Indeterminate atypia in urinary tract cytology: Does it really matter?

Do Urine Cytology and FISH Analysis Have a Role in the Follow-Up Protocol of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend a stringent follow-up regimen that includes interval cystoureteronephscopy, CT urography, and selective urine cytology sampling for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients undergoing endoscopic treatment and management. There are no recommendations regarding FISH analysis. Our purpose was to assess the efficacy of cytology and FISH as part of the follow-up protocol and its significance to clinical decision-making in this scenario.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients who managed endoscopically for UTUC at our institute between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical data, histology, cytology, and FISH results were collected. FISH analysis was considered malignant according to Paris criteria.

RESULTS

During the study period, 62 patients underwent 561 ureteroscopies as part of the treatment and follow-up regimen of low-grade UTUC. Urine from the affected upper tract was sampled for cytology in 377 procedures, and FISH analyses were performed in 273. In 75.4% of FISH analyses, the result was different from the cytology results: FISH found malignant aberrations in 15.5% of cases where cytology was benign. Furthermore, FISH classified all the cells defined as atypical via cytology as either benign or malignant. In only one case (0.17%), the urinary cytology report changed the follow-up regimen.

CONCLUSION

Cytology may be omitted from the follow-up protocol of low-grade UTUC. In the handful of cases cytology does assist the diagnosis of UTUC, there is an additional benefit to performing FISH analysis, particularly when cellular atypia is reported in the cytology results.

Urinary IL-6 and IL-8 as predictive markers in bladder urothelial carcinoma: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Cytokines are known to be a key a factor in numerous malignancies and to exert an important regulatory role in the tumor microenvironment. Interest has grown in understanding how cytokines modulate the tumor microenvironment and which cytokines may serve as markers of the tumor process; however, a complete picture of the cytokine landscape in bladder cancer remains unclear.

METHODS

Fresh urine specimens with sufficient volume were collected at random intervals. The urine concentrations of IL-8 (CXCL8), CCL18, and CXCL9 were determined using the standard commercially available enzyme immunoassay. The urine concentrations of IL-6 were determined using the high sensitivity enzyme immunoassay kit. Urinary cytokine concentrations were normalized with urinary creatinine concentrations.

RESULTS

Significantly elevated concentrations of IL-6 and IL-8 were detected in the urine from patients with urothelial carcinoma on follow-up compared to patients with benign follow-up. The presence of both IL-6 and IL-8 in the urine samples from the high grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) cohort revealed a clear discrimination when compared to samples from patients with benign follow-up. The presence of the combination of both IL-6 and IL-8 had a sensitivity of 90.0% and a specificity of 81.25%. Similar data were obtained when receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed on both IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations in the urine from patients with HGUC vs. the hematuria cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of IL-6 and IL-8 in urine specimens may have predictive value for urothelial carcinoma. However, a large longitudinal study is required to statistically eliminate confounding factors and support this theory.

Perceptions of Paris: an international survey in preparation for The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology 2.0 (TPS 2.0)

INTRODUCTION

An international panel of experts in the field of urinary cytopathology conducted a survey, supported by the American Society of Cytopathology, to seek opinions, gather evidence, and identify practice patterns regarding urinary cytology before and after the introduction of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytopathology (TPS). Results from this survey were utilized in the development of the second edition of TPS (TPS-2.0).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group, originally formed during the 2013 International Congress of Cytology, reconvened at the 2019 annual meeting of the American Society of Cytopathology. To prepare for the second edition of TPS, the group generated a survey that included 43 questions related to the taxonomy and practice of urinary cytology.

RESULTS

A total of 523 participant responses were collected, and 451 from 54 countries passed a qualifying screen. Three hundred ninety-four participants provided information about their work settings. Eighty-two percent (218/266) of responding participants use TPS. One hundred sixty-eight people who responded on their urinary cytology atypia rates reported an average decrease from 21.6% to 16%. Over three fourths of participants felt that the same criteria should be used for upper and lower tract interpretations and for instrumented and voided samples. There were varied opinions on addressing atypical squamous cells and suggestions for an expanded discussion of the issue to be included in TPS 2.0.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the survey demonstrate strong support for TPS and show a decreased self-reported atypia rate in the laboratories using TPS. The majority of participants related that the criteria put forth for the reporting categories were user-friendly and applied with relative ease. The comment section of the survey included suggestions from the participants for further improvement of TPS. Results of this survey have been useful in fine-tuning and advancing TPS. They were considered along with recent literature to generate the second edition of TPS.

The Diagnostic Dilemma of Urothelial Tissue Fragments in Urinary Tract Cytology Specimens

Since the release of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS), the assessment of urine cytology specimens has primarily focused on the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) and carcinoma in situ (CIS). Fortunately, the malignant cells in these lesions tend to be loosely cohesive, resulting in the natural exfoliation of individual malignant cells into the urine. However, HGUC/CIS lesions occasionally exfoliate larger fragments which can be difficult to assess due to cellular overlap and fragment three-dimensionality. Furthermore, reactive benign urothelial fragments and fragments from low-grade urothelial neoplasms (LGUN) may also be seen in urine specimens and contain atypical cytomorphologic features. As a result, the significance of urothelial tissue fragments (UTFs) is often unclear. Herein, we discuss the literature on UTFs before and after the implementation of TPS, as well as strategies to help overcome this diagnostic challenge.