T-box binding site mediates the dorsal activation of myf-5 in Xenopus gastrula embryos

TBX1 regulates myogenic differentiation by activating the TGFβ-Smad2/3 pathway in myoblasts

TBX1 is systematically conserved in the T-box transcription factor family and regulates craniofacial muscle development during various stages of myogenesis, including commitment, proliferation, terminal differentiation, and survival. However, the role and mechanism by which TBX1 regulates the myogenic development of myoblasts remains unclear. In our study, we overexpressed TBX1 in mouse C2C12 myoblasts using a lentivirus method. We found that TBX1 inhibited cell proliferation and muscle differentiation, which had no effect on apoptosis. During myogenic differentiation, we also found that TBX1 overexpressing cells regulate myogenic differentiation by upregulating the expression levels of Smad2 and Smad3 and downregulating the expression level of MEF2C. After treatment with a specific inhibitor of Smad3 (SIS3), the myogenic differentiation of wild-type and TBX1 overexpressing cells increased. Thus, TBX1 may regulate myoblast muscle differentiation by enhancing the expression of Smad2 and Smad3. TBX1 may be a therapeutic target for muscular dystrophy.

Making muscle: Morphogenetic movements and molecular mechanisms of myogenesis in Xenopus laevis

Xenopus laevis offers unprecedented access to the intricacies of muscle development. The large, robust embryos make it ideal for manipulations at both the tissue and molecular level. In particular, this model system can be used to fate map early muscle progenitors, visualize cell behaviors associated with somitogenesis, and examine the role of signaling pathways that underlie induction, specification, and differentiation of muscle. Several characteristics that are unique to X. laevis include myogenic waves with distinct gene expression profiles and the late formation of dermomyotome and sclerotome. Furthermore, myogenesis in the metamorphosing frog is biphasic, facilitating regeneration studies. In this review, we describe the morphogenetic movements that shape the somites and discuss signaling and transcriptional regulation during muscle development and regeneration. With recent advances in gene editing tools, X. laevis remains a premier model organism for dissecting the complex mechanisms underlying the specification, cell behaviors, and formation of the musculature system.

Downstream of FGF during mesoderm formation in Xenopus: the roles of Elk-1 and Egr-1

Signalling by members of the FGF family is required for induction and maintenance of the mesoderm during amphibian development. One of the downstream effectors of FGF is the SRF-interacting Ets family member Elk-1, which, after phosphorylation by MAP kinase, activates the expression of immediate-early genes. Here, we show that Xenopus Elk-1 is phosphorylated in response to FGF signalling in a dynamic pattern throughout the embryo. Loss of XElk-1 function causes reduced expression of Xbra at neurula stages, followed by a failure to form notochord and muscle and then the partial loss of trunk structures. One of the genes regulated by XElk-1 is XEgr-1, which encodes a zinc finger transcription factor: we show that phosphorylated XElk-1 forms a complex with XSRF that binds to the XEgr-1 promoter. Superficially, Xenopus tropicalis embryos with reduced levels of XEgr-1 resemble those lacking XElk-1, but to our surprise, levels of Xbra are elevated at late gastrula stages in such embryos, and over-expression of XEgr-1 causes the down-regulation of Xbra both in whole embryos and in animal pole regions treated with activin or FGF. In contrast, the myogenic regulatory factor XMyoD is activated by XEgr-1 in a direct manner. We discuss these counterintuitive results in terms of the genetic regulatory network to which XEgr-1 contributes.

Smad6 inhibits the transcriptional activity of Tbx6 by mediating its degradation

Members of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and T-box gene families play several critical roles in the early embryonic development and tissue homeostasis. Although BMP proteins are the upstream regulators of T-box genes, few studies have investigated the molecular mechanisms between these two protein families. Here, we report that Tbx6 interacts directly with Smad6, an inhibitory Smad that antagonizes the BMP signal. This interaction is mediated through the Mad homology 2 (MH2) domain of Smad6 and residues 90-180 of Tbx6. We demonstrate that Smad6 facilitates the degradation of Tbx6 protein through recruitment of Smurf1, a ubiquitin E3 ligase. Consequently, Smad6 reduces Tbx6-mediated Myf-5 gene activation. Furthermore, specific knockdown of endogenous Smad6 and Smurf1 by small interfering RNA increases the protein levels of Tbx6 and enhance the expression of Tbx6 target genes. Collectively, these findings reveal that Smad6 serves as a critical mediator of BMP signal via a functional interaction with Tbx6, thus regulating the activation of Tbx6 downstream genes during cell differentiation.

PMesogenin1 and 2 function directly downstream of Xtbx6 in Xenopus somitogenesis and myogenesis

T-box transcription factor tbx6 and basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factor pMesogenin1 are reported to be involved in paraxial mesodermal differentiation. To clarify the relationship between these genes in Xenopus laevis, we isolated pMesogenin2, which showed high homology with pMesogenin1. Both pMesogenin1 and 2 appeared to be transcriptional activators and were induced by a hormone-inducible version of Xtbx6 without secondary protein synthesis in animal cap assays. The pMesogenin2 promoter contained three potential T-box binding sites with which Xtbx6 protein was shown to interact, and a reporter gene construct containing these sites was activated by Xtbx6. Xtbx6 knockdown reduced pMesogenin1 and 2 expressions, but not vice versa. Xtbx6 and pMesogenin1 and 2 knockdowns caused similar phenotypic abnormalities including somite malformation and ventral body wall muscle hypoplasia, suggesting that Xtbx6 is a direct regulator of pMesogenin1 and 2, which are both involved in somitogenesis and myogenesis including that of body wall muscle in Xenopus laevis.

Multiple upstream modules regulate zebrafish myf5 expression

Background

Myf5 is one member of the basic helix-loop-helix family of transcription factors, and it functions as a myogenic factor that is important for the specification and differentiation of muscle cells. The expression of myf5 is somite- and stage-dependent during embryogenesis through a delicate regulation. However, this complex regulatory mechanism of myf5 is not clearly understood.

Results

We isolated a 156-kb bacterial artificial chromosome clone that includes an upstream 80-kb region and a downstream 70-kb region of zebrafish myf5 and generated a transgenic line carrying this 156-kb segment fused to a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene. We find strong GFP expression in the most rostral somite and in the presomitic mesoderm during segmentation stages, similar to endogenous myf5 expression. Later, the GFP signals persist in caudal somites near the tail bud but are down-regulated in the older, rostral somites. During the pharyngula period, we detect GFP signals in pectoral fin buds, dorsal rostral myotomes, hypaxial myotomes, and inferior oblique and superior oblique muscles, a pattern that also corresponds well with endogenous myf5 transcripts. To characterize the specific upstream cis-elements that regulate this complex and dynamic expression pattern, we also generated several transgenic lines that harbor various lengths within the upstream 80-kb segment. We find that (1) the -80 kb/-9977 segment contains a fin and cranial muscle element and a notochord repressor; (2) the -9977/-6213 segment contains a strong repressive element that does not include the notochord-specific repressor; (3) the -6212/-2938 segment contains tissue-specific elements for bone and spinal cord; (4) the -2937/-291 segment contains an eye enhancer, and the -2937/-2457 segment is required for notochord and myocyte expression; and (5) the -290/-1 segment is responsible for basal transcription in somites and the presomitic mesoderm.

Conclusion

We suggest that the cell lineage-specific expression of myf5 is delicately orchestrated by multiple modules within the distal upstream region. This study provides an insight to understand the molecular control of myf5 and myogenesis in the zebrafish.

Tbx1 regulation of myogenic differentiation in the limb and cranial mesoderm

The T-box transcription factor Tbx1 has been implicated in DiGeorge syndrome, the most frequent syndrome due to a chromosomal deletion. Gene inactivation of Tbx1 in mice results in craniofacial and branchial arch defects, including myogenic defects in the first and second branchial arches. A T-box binding site has been identified in the Xenopus Myf5 promoter, and in other species, T-box genes have been implicated in myogenic fate. Here we analyze Tbx1 expression in the developing chick embryo relating its expression to the onset of myogenic differentiation and cellular fate within the craniofacial mesoderm. We show that Tbx1 is expressed before capsulin, the first known marker of branchial arch 1 and 2 muscles. We also show that, as in the mouse, Tbx1 is expressed in endothelial cells, another mesodermal derivative, and, therefore, Tbx1 alone cannot specify the myogenic lineage. In addition, Tbx1 expression was identified in both chick and mouse limb myogenic cells, initially being restricted to the dorsal muscle mass, but in contrast, to the head, here Tbx1 is expressed after the onset of myogenic commitment. Functional studies revealed that loss of Tbx1 function reduces the number of myocytes in the head and limb, whereas increasing Tbx1 activity has the converse effect. Finally, analysis of the Tbx1-mesoderm-specific knockout mouse demonstrated the cell autonomous requirement for Tbx1 during myocyte development in the cranial mesoderm.

Foxd3 mediates zebrafish myf5 expression during early somitogenesis

Myf5, one of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, controls muscle differentiation and is expressed in somites during early embryogenesis. However, the transcription factors bound to the cis-elements of myf5 are poorly understood. In this study, we used the yeast one-hybrid assay and found that Forkhead box d3 (Foxd3) interacted specifically with the -82/-62 cassette, a key element directing somite-specific expression of myf5. The dual-luciferase assay revealed that the expression of Foxd3 potently transactivated the myf5 promoter. Knocking down foxd3 with morpholino oligonucleotide (MO) resulted in a dramatic down-regulation of myf5 in somites and adaxial cells but not in the presomitic mesoderm. On the other hand, myod expression remained unchanged in foxd3 morphants. Foxd3 mediation of myf5 expression is stage-dependent, maintaining myf5 expression in the somites and adaxial cells during the 7- to 18-somite stage. Furthermore, in the pax3 morphant, the expression of foxd3 was down-regulated greatly and the expression of myf5 was similar to that of the foxd3 morphant. Co-injection of foxd3 mRNA and pax3-MO1 greatly restored the expression of myf5 in the somites and adaxial cells, suggesting that pax3 induces foxd3 expression, which then induces the expression of myf5. This report is the first study to show that Foxd3, a well-known regulator in neural crest development, is also involved in myf5 regulation.

The differentiation and morphogenesis of craniofacial muscles

Unraveling the complex tissue interactions necessary to generate the structural and functional diversity present among craniofacial muscles is challenging. These muscles initiate their development within a mesenchymal population bounded by the brain, pharyngeal endoderm, surface ectoderm, and neural crest cells. This set of spatial relations, and in particular the segmental properties of these adjacent tissues, are unique to the head. Additionally, the lack of early epithelialization in head mesoderm necessitates strategies for generating discrete myogenic foci that may differ from those operating in the trunk. Molecular data indeed indicate dissimilar methods of regulation, yet transplantation studies suggest that some head and trunk myogenic populations are interchangeable. The first goal of this review is to present key features of these diversities, identifying and comparing tissue and molecular interactions regulating myogenesis in the head and trunk. Our second focus is on the diverse morphogenetic movements exhibited by craniofacial muscles. Precursors of tongue muscles partly mimic migrations of appendicular myoblasts, whereas myoblasts destined to form extraocular muscles condense within paraxial mesoderm, then as large cohorts they cross the mesoderm:neural crest interface en route to periocular regions. Branchial muscle precursors exhibit yet another strategy, establishing contacts with neural crest populations before branchial arch formation and maintaining these relations through subsequent stages of morphogenesis. With many of the prerequisite stepping-stones in our knowledge of craniofacial myogenesis now in place, discovering the cellular and molecular interactions necessary to initiate and sustain the differentiation and morphogenesis of these neglected craniofacial muscles is now an attainable goal.

p38 MAP kinase regulates the expression of XMyf5 and affects distinct myogenic programs during Xenopus development

The p38 MAPK signaling pathway is essential for skeletal muscle differentiation in tissue culture models. We demonstrate a novel role for p38 MAPK in myogenesis during early Xenopus laevis development. Interfering with p38 MAPK causes distinct defects in myogenesis. The initial expression of Myf5 is selectively blocked, while expression of MyoD is unaffected. Expression of a subset of muscle structural genes is reduced. Convergent extension movements are prevented and segmentation of the paraxial mesoderm is delayed, probably due to the failure of cells to withdraw from the cell cycle. Myotubes are properly formed; however, at later stages, they begin to degenerate, and the boundaries between somites disappear. Significant apoptotic cell death occurs in most parts of the somites. The ventral body wall muscle derived from migratory progenitor cells of the ventral somite region is poorly formed. Our data indicate that the developmental defects caused by p38alpha-knockdown were mediated by the loss of XMyf5 expression. Thus, this study identifies a specific intracellular pathway in which p38 MAPK and Myf5 proteins regulate a distinct myogenic program.

The del22q11.2 candidate gene Tbx1 regulates branchiomeric myogenesis

Formation and remodeling of the pharyngeal arches play central roles in craniofacial development. TBX1, encoding a T-box-containing transcription factor, is the major candidate gene for del22q11.2 (DiGeorge or velo-cardio-facial) syndrome, characterized by craniofacial defects, thymic hypoplasia, cardiovascular anomalies, velopharyngeal insufficiency and skeletal muscle hypotonia. Tbx1 is expressed in pharyngeal mesoderm, which gives rise to branchiomeric skeletal muscles of the head and neck. Although the genetic control of craniofacial muscle development is known to involve pathways distinct from those operational in the trunk, the regulation of branchiomeric myogenesis has remained enigmatic. Here we show that branchiomeric muscle development is severely perturbed in Tbx1 mutant mice. In the absence of Tbx1, the myogenic determination genes Myf5 and MyoD fail to be normally activated in pharyngeal mesoderm. Unspecified precursor cells expressing genes encoding the transcriptional repressors Capsulin and MyoR are present in the mandibular arch of Tbx1 mutant embryos. Sporadic activation of Myf5 and MyoD in these precursor cells results in the random presence or absence of hypoplastic mandibular arch-derived muscles at later developmental stages. Tbx1 is also required for normal expression of Tlx1 and Fgf10 in pharyngeal mesoderm, in addition to correct neural crest cell patterning in the mandibular arch. Tbx1 therefore regulates the onset of branchiomeric myogenesis and controls normal mandibular arch development, including robust transcriptional activation of myogenic determination genes. While no abnormalities in branchiomeric myogenesis were detected in Tbx1(+/-) mice, reduced TBX1 levels may contribute to pharyngeal hypotonia in del22q11.2 patients.

Novel cis-element in intron 1 represses somite expression of zebrafish myf-5

Myf-5 is a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor that controls muscle differentiation. During early embryogenesis, myf-5 expression is transient, somite- and stage-specific. However, the negative regulation of myf-5 is poorly understood. We constructed a plasmid [(-9977/-1)/E1/I1/E2/GFP] that contains the sequence -9977 to -1, exon 1 (E1), intron 1 (I1), and exon 2 (E2) of zebrafish (Danio rerio) myf-5 and a reporter GFP gene. This plasmid was microinjected into zebrafish zygotes. Surprisingly, the somite-specific expression rate of reporter GFP in the transgenic embryos was extremely low (2%, n=392), compared to that of (-9977/-1)/GFP (92%, n=210). Dramatic repression of myf-5 expression was also observed in embryos microinjected with plasmids in which the sequence -8600/-1, -2937/-1 or -290/-1 was linked to E1/I1/E2/GFP. Thus, intron 1 contains a silencer that specifically represses the activity of myf-5. Functional analysis of intron 1 showed a strong, negative, cis-regulatory element was located at +502/+835. Its function was orientation- and position-dependent. The repressive capability of this silencer was completely dependent on two core motifs, IE1 (+502/+527) and IE2 (+816/+835), and a 156-bp spanning sequence that lies between them. This is the first study to identify a novel, cis-acting silencer in intron 1 that is crucial to negatively regulating zebrafish myf-5 expression.

Activin/Nodal signals mediate the ventral expression of myf-5 in Xenopus gastrula embryos

Expression of myf-5, a key component of myogenic regulatory genes, expands into the ventral marginal zone during Xenopus gastrulation after the dorsal activation takes place. Little is known about how this dynamic expression pattern occurs. Here, we provide evidences to suggest that Activin/Nodal signals participate in the regulation of ventral expression of Xmyf-5 in gastrula embryos. Two Smad binding elements (SBEs) within the Xenopus myf-5 promoter can specifically interact with Smad4 protein. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the two SBEs are both indispensable for conferring responsiveness to Activin/Nodal signals and to ventral expression of myf-5 in Xenopus gastrula embryos.

Novel regulatory sequence -82/-62 functions as a key element to drive the somite-specificity of zebrafish myf-5

Myf-5, a transcription factor that controls muscle differentiation, is expressed in somites during early embryogenesis. However, gene regulation of myf-5 is poorly understood and detailed functional analysis of the regulatory cis-elements is needed. In zebrafish, the myf-5 upstream sequence from -82 to -62 (-82/-62) was fused with a basal promoter and transferred to fertilized zebrafish eggs. The -82/-62 cassette drove green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene expression specifically in the somites. Moreover, GFP signals were detected exclusively in the somites of 28-hpf embryos derived from eggs injected with pCMV-5x(-82/-62), which contained five copies of the -82/-62 cassette inserted within cytomegalovirus promoter/enhancer. Thus, the -82/-62 cassette, conserved in mouse myf-5, functions to drive somite-specific expression and to repress nonspecific expression during the early development of zebrafish embryos. Mutated sequence analysis of -82/-62 cassette showed that the -70/-62 sequence was the key element for controlling myf-5 specificity. The putative CCAAT-like box, located at -66/-62, could not direct somite-specific expression. A DNA-protein complex was specifically formed between the -70/-62 probe and embryonic nuclear extracts. We conclude that the -70/-62 motif is essential for controlling somite-specific expression and the CCAAT-like box is essential for activating gene transcription.