1
|
Budgett J, Sommerlad A, Kupeli N, Zabihi S, Rockwood K, Cooper C. Personalized goals of people living with dementia and family carers: A content analysis of goals set within an individually tailored psychosocial intervention trial. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (NEW YORK, N. Y.) 2024; 10:e12493. [PMID: 39011459 PMCID: PMC11247364 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Person-centered goals capture individual priorities in personal contexts. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) has been used in drug trials involving people living with dementia (PLWD) but GAS has been characterized as difficult to incorporate into trials and clinical practice. We used GAS in a trial of New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS)-family, a manualized care and support intervention, as the primary outcome and to tailor the interventions to goals set. We aimed to assess the feasibility and content of baseline goal-setting. Methods We developed training for nonclinical facilitators to set individualized GAS goals remotely with PLWD and family carer dyads, or carers alone, in the intervention trial, during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative content analysis of the goals set explored participants' priorities and unmet needs, to consider how existing GAS goal domains might be extended in a psychosocial intervention trial context. Results Eleven facilitators were successfully trained to set and score GAS goals. A total of 313/328 (95%) participants were able to collaboratively set three to five goals with the facilitators. Of these, 302 randomized participating dyads set 1043 (mean 3.5, range 3 to 5) goals. We deductively coded 719 (69%) goals into five existing GAS domains (mood, behavior, self-care, cognition, and instrumental activities of daily living); 324 (31%) goals were inductively coded into four new domains: carer break, carer mood, carer behavior, and carer sleep. The most frequently set goals pertained to social support. There was little variation in types of goals set based on the context of who set them or level of pandemic restrictions in place. Discussion It is feasible for people without clinical training to set GAS holistic goals for PLWD and family carers in the community. GAS has potential to facilitate personalization of care and support interventions, such as NIDUS-family, and facilitate the roll out of more personalized care. Highlights Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) can capture meaningful priorities of people with dementia and their family carers.A psychosocial intervention RCT used GAS as the primary outcome measure and goals were set collaboratively by non-clinically trained facilitators.The findings underscore the feasibility of using GAS as an outcome measure with this population.The content analysis findings unveiled the diversity in experiences and priorities of the study participants.GAS has the potential to support the implementation of more person-centred approaches to dementia care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Budgett
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental HealthWolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Andrew Sommerlad
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Islington Memory Service, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of PsychiatryLondonUK
| | - Sedigheh Zabihi
- Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Divisions of Geriatric Medicine & NeurologyDepartment of MedicineDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental HealthWolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
- Memory Services, East London NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Budgett J. Setting individualised goals for people living with dementia and their family carers: A systematic review of goal-setting outcome measures and their psychometric properties. DEMENTIA 2024; 23:312-340. [PMID: 38105445 PMCID: PMC10807246 DOI: 10.1177/14713012231222309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individualised goal-setting outcome measures can be a useful way of reflecting people living with dementia and family carers' differing priorities regarding quality-of-life domains in the highly heterogeneous symptomatology of the disease. Evaluating goal-setting measures is challenging, and there is limited evidence for their psychometric properties. AIM (1) To describe what goal-setting outcomes have been used in this population; (2) To evaluate their validity, reliability, and feasibility in RCTs. METHOD We systematically reviewed studies that utilised goal-setting outcome measures for people living dementia or their family carers. We adapted a risk of bias and quality rating system based on the COSMIN guidelines to evaluate the measurement properties of outcomes when used within RCTs. RESULTS Thirty studies meeting inclusion criteria used four different goal-setting outcome measures: Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), Bangor Goal Setting Interview (BGSI), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Individually Prioritized Problems Assessment (IPPA); other papers have reported study-specific goal-setting attainment systems. Only GAS has been used as an outcome over periods greater than 9 months (up to a year). Within RCTs there was moderate quality evidence for sufficient content validity and construct validity for GAS, COPM and the BGSI. Reliability was only assessed in one RCT (using BGSI); in which two raters reviewed interview transcripts to rate goals with excellent inter-rater reliability. Feasibility was reported as good across the measures with a low level of missing data. CONCLUSION We found moderate quality evidence for good content and construct validity and feasibility of GAS, BGSI and COPM. While more evidence of reliability of these measures is needed, we recommend that future trials consider using individualised goal setting measures, to report the effect of interventions on outcomes that are most meaningful to people living with dementia and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Budgett
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, and Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfsen Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Okita Y, Kawaguchi Y, Inoue Y, Ohno K, Sawada T, Levack W, Tomori K. Characteristics of goal-setting tools in adult rehabilitation: A scoping review. Clin Rehabil 2024; 38:234-250. [PMID: 37644842 PMCID: PMC10725121 DOI: 10.1177/02692155231197383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This scoping review aims to map the literature on goal-setting tools in adult rehabilitation, exploring their characteristics, target users and supporting evidence to inform practice and future research in this area. METHODS We completed a comprehensive search of four databases to identify relevant articles on tools for goal setting in rehabilitation. We followed Arkey and O'Malley's scoping review process to guide article selection, data extraction and data analysis. RESULTS We identified a total of 165 studies that reported on 55 different goal-setting tools, including tools for goal selection and goal documentation (n = 31), goal setting and intervention planning (n = 15), and for measuring the quality of the goal-setting process (n = 9). Over half of the tools were primarily designed for use in rehabilitation of physical disabilities (n = 32). Some tools fell under multiple sub-categories based on their characteristics as follows: 22 framework tools, 12 interview tools, 9 outcome measurement tools for goal achievement, 6 outcome measurement tools for goal quality and 25 documentation tools. The majority of goal-setting instruments targeted goals at the level of activity and participation (n = 51) and aimed to facilitate a client-centred or shared decision-making approach to rehabilitation planning (n = 46). CONCLUSIONS This study provides a comprehensive overview of existing goal-setting tools, highlighting their characteristics, target users and identified needs. These findings can enhance practitioners' awareness of the range of goal-setting tools available and can enable more effective utilization of these tools in clinical practice. Further research should investigate how clinicians can combine multiple tools to deliver goal setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuho Okita
- School of Health Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Yuko Kawaguchi
- Department of Rehabilitation, Kaikoukai Rehabilitation Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuki Inoue
- Central Rehabilitation Department, Yokohama Rousai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kanta Ohno
- Major of Occupational Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Tokyo University of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsunori Sawada
- Major of Occupational Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Tokyo University of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - William Levack
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Kounosuke Tomori
- Major of Occupational Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Tokyo University of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu H, Lou VWQ, Xu S. Randomized controlled trials on promoting self-care behaviors among informal caregivers of older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:86. [PMID: 38263091 PMCID: PMC10804633 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04614-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informal caregivers of older patients often neglect their self-care, despite the mental and physical health effects of caregiving. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on self-care interventions for informal caregivers are lacking, making it difficult to determine effective strategies. This systematic review explored the definition and categories of self-care RCTs for informal caregivers and a meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of these interventions. METHODS Seven databases (Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched for articles in English reporting on self-care intervention outcomes for informal caregivers of patients aged 60 years or older. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses were conducted. RESULTS Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review, of which fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. RCTs lacked a clear definition of self-care, mainly focused on promoting physical and mental health and individual capacity, and neglected disease prevention. The interventions focused on self-management for health and individual agency, with less attention on health literacy, decision-making capacity, self-monitoring for health status, and linkage to the health system. Meta-analysis results showed that RCTs had a small effect on reducing anxiety (SMD = -0.142, 95% CI [-0.302, 0.017], p = .081) but a significant effect on reducing depression (SMD = -0.214, 95% CI [-0.353, -0.076], p = .002). Country and type of caregiver significantly contributed to the effect of reducing caregivers' depression in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS Studies on caregiver-centered self-care interventions are limited, resulting in a lack of a clear definition and comprehensive intervention. RCTs indicated a small effect on informal caregivers' mental health, and interventions should consider both mental and physical health. More evidence is needed on the effectiveness of self-care interventions for informal caregivers' anxiety and physical health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanran Liu
- Department of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Sau Po Centre On Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Vivian W Q Lou
- Department of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.
- Sau Po Centre On Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Shicheng Xu
- Department of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Sau Po Centre On Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fegter O, Santos H, Rademaker AW, Roberts AC, Rogalski E. Suitability of Goal Attainment Scaling in Older Adult Populations with Neurodegenerative Disease Experiencing Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gerontology 2023; 69:1002-1013. [PMID: 36966524 PMCID: PMC11214152 DOI: 10.1159/000529984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Identifying responsive outcome measures for assessing functional change related to cognition, communication, and quality of life for individuals with neurodegenerative disease is important for intervention design and clinical care. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) has been used as an outcome measure to formally develop and systematically measure incremental progress toward functional, patient-centered goals in clinical settings. Evidence suggests that GAS is reliable and feasible for use in older adult populations and in adult populations with cognitive impairment, but no review has assessed the suitability of GAS in older adults with neurodegenerative disease experiencing dementia or cognitive impairment, based on responsiveness. This study conducted a systematic review to evaluate the suitability of GAS as an outcome measure for older adult populations with neurodegenerative disease experiencing dementia or cognitive impairment, based on responsiveness. METHODS The review was registered with PROSPERO and performed by searching ten electronic scientific databases (PubMed, Medline OVID, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, OTSeeker, REHABDATA) and four registries (Clinicaltrials.gov, Grey Literature Report, Mednar, OpenGrey). A summary measure of responsiveness (post-intervention minus pre-intervention mean GAS T-score) was compared across eligible studies using a random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias in included studies was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group. RESULTS 882 eligible articles were identified and screened by two independent reviewers. Ten studies met inclusion criteria for the final analysis. Of the ten included reports, 3 focus on all-cause dementia, 3 on multiple sclerosis, 1 on Parkinson's disease, 1 on mild cognitive impairment, 1 on Alzheimer's disease, and 1 on primary progressive aphasia. Responsiveness analyses showed pre- and post-intervention GAS goals were significantly different from zero (Z = 7.48, p < 0.001), with post-intervention GAS scores being higher than pre-intervention GAS scores. Three included studies showed a high risk of bias, 3 showed a moderate risk of bias, and 4 showed a low risk of bias. Overall risk of bias of included studies was rated as moderate. CONCLUSION GAS showed an improvement in goal attainment across different dementia patient populations and intervention types. The overall moderate risk of bias suggests that while bias is present across included studies (e.g., small sample size, unblinded assessors), the observed effect likely represents the true effect. This suggests that GAS is responsive to functional change and may be suitable for use in older adult populations with neurodegenerative disease experiencing dementia or cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ollie Fegter
- Mesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Haylie Santos
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alfred W. Rademaker
- Mesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Angela C. Roberts
- Mesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Computer Science, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Canadian Centre for Activity and Aging, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Emily Rogalski
- Mesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clarkson P, Pitts R, Islam S, Peconi J, Russell I, Fegan G, Beresford R, Entwistle C, Gillan V, Orrell M, Challis D, Chester H, Hughes J, Kapur N, Roe B, Malik B, Robinson C. Dementia Early-Stage Cognitive Aids New Trial (DESCANT) of memory aids and guidance for people with dementia: randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93:1001-1009. [PMID: 34667103 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common memory aids for people with dementia at home are recommended. However, rigorous evaluation is lacking, particularly what guidance or support is valued. OBJECTIVE To investigate effects of memory aids and guidance by dementia support practitioners (DSPs) for people in early-stage dementia through a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. METHODS Of 469 people with mild-to-moderate dementia and their informal carers, 468 were randomised to a DSP with memory aids or to usual care plus existing dementia guide. Allocation was stratified by Trust/Health Board; time since first attendance at memory service; gender; age; and living with primary carer or not. Primary outcome was Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS) Score at 3 and 6 months (primary end-point). Secondary outcomes for people with dementia: quality of life (CASP-19; DEMQOL); cognition and functioning (Clinical Dementia Rating Scale; S-MMSE); capability (ICECAP-O); social networks (LSNS-R); and instrumental daily living activities (R-IDDD). Secondary outcomes for carers: psychological health (GHQ-12); sense of competence (SSCQ). RESULTS DSPs were successfully trained, compliance was good and welcomed by participants. Mean 6 months BADLS Score increased to 14.6 (SD: 10.4) in intervention and 12.6 (SD: 8.1) in comparator, indicative of greater dependence in the activities of daily living. Adjusted between-group difference was 0.38 (95% CI: -0.89 to 1.65, p=0.56). Though this suggests greater dependency in the intervention group the difference was not significant. No differences were found in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This intervention did not maintain independence in the activities of daily living with no improvement in other outcomes for people with dementia or carers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12591717.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Clarkson
- Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rosa Pitts
- Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Saiful Islam
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Julie Peconi
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Ian Russell
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Greg Fegan
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Rebecca Beresford
- Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Vincent Gillan
- Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Martin Orrell
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Challis
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Helen Chester
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jane Hughes
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Narinder Kapur
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Brenda Roe
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| | - Baber Malik
- Social Care and Society, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Frank L, Jennings LA, Petersen RC, Majid T, Gilmore-Bykovskyi A, Schicker L, Karlawish J. Participation of persons with dementia and their caregivers in research. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 69:1784-1792. [PMID: 34245586 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Institute on Aging, in conjunction with the Department of Health and Human Services as part of the National Alzheimer's Project Act, convened a 2020 National Research Summit on Care, Services, and Supports for Persons with Dementia and their Caregivers. This review article addresses research participation by persons living with dementia (PLWD) and their care partners in two different ways: as research participants with input on outcomes studied and as engaged research partners. RESULTS This article summarizes each of the topics presented at this Summit session, followed by reflection from the session panelists. Lee Jennings examined collection of outcomes directly from PLWD and the potential for individualized outcomes to enhance measurement in intervention trials. Ron Petersen discussed the impact of nomenclature on research and clinical care, and how and why investigators should be mindful of the connection between dementia nomenclature and the conduct of dementia research. Tabassum Majid examined strategies for engagement in research, including specific examples of involving PLWD and their care partners (including staff in assisted living and skilled nursing facilities), and the potential for this research engagement to improve our understanding of interventions in dementia. CONCLUSIONS Research participation by PLWD and their care partners is evolving. This review summarizes three areas of opportunity and steps for researchers to work with PLWD and their care partners to design and conduct research that enhances knowledge based on what we learn from PLWD and their care partners, and creates knowledge with them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori Frank
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Lee A Jennings
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jason Karlawish
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|