Days alive and out of hospital following transoral robotic surgery: Cohort study of 262 patients with head and neck cancer

Imaging of Tumor Stroma Using 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Primary Tumors in Head and Neck Cancer of Unknown Primary: A Comparative Imaging Trial

The low detection rate of primary tumors by current diagnostic techniques remains a major concern for patients with head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP). Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the potential role of 68Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (68Ga-FAPI) PET/CT compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of primary tumors of HNCUP. Methods: In this prospective comparative imaging trial conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 91 patients with negative or equivocal findings of a primary tumor by comprehensive clinical examination and conventional imaging were enrolled from June 2020 to September 2022. The presence of a primary tumor was recorded by 3 experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Primary lesions were validated by histopathologic analysis and a composite reference standard. Results: Of the 91 patients (18 women, 73 men; median age, 60 y; age range, 24-76 y), primary tumors were detected in 46 (51%) patients after a thorough diagnostic work-up. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT detected more primary lesions than 18F-FDG PET/CT (46 vs. 17, P < 0.001) and showed better sensitivity, positive predictive value, and accuracy in locating primary tumors (51% vs. 25%, 98% vs. 43%, and 51% vs. 19%, respectively). Furthermore, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT led to treatment changes in 22 of 91 (24%) patients compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT. The Kaplan-Meier curve illustrated that patients with unidentified primary tumors had a significantly worse prognosis than patients with identified primary tumors (hazard ratio, 5.77; 95% CI, 1.86-17.94; P = 0.0097). Conclusion: 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT outperforms 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting primary lesions and could serve as a sensitive, reliable, and reproducible imaging modality for HNCUP patients.

The effect of dexamethasone on functional pain following Transoral Robotic Surgery: a randomized double blinded clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Pain is prevalent after most TransOral Robotic Surgery (TORS) procedures and may limit function i.e. swallowing. Currently, there is limited knowledge regarding optimal pain treatment in TORS.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

This clinical trial randomized patients to either a high-dose dexamethasone or low-dose dexamethasone treatment in addition to a multimodal basic analgesic protocol. The aim of the trial was to investigate the pain intensity during rest and swallowing using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after TORS lingual tonsillectomy. Secondary outcomes were acceptable food consistency, nausea, vomiting, opioid rescue usage, length of hospitalization, feeding tube placements, readmissions, blood glucose levels and postoperative complications.

METHODS

The trial was conducted between August 2020 and October 2022. Eligible patients were patients scheduled for TORS-L treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome or as part of the diagnostic work-up of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were and randomized 1:1. There were overall no significant differences between groups in the reported VAS scores during rest or swallowing (p ≥ .05). Overall, there were no differences in the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in the pain intensity in the two treatment groups allocated to a basic multimodal analgesic package and either high-dose dexamethasone or low-dose dexamethasone treatment. The trial is the first RCT to include pain measurement during a procedure-relevant activity, thus creating a platform for future recovery studies.

Transoral robotic surgery - time for consensus on pain assessment. A review

BACKGROUND

In Head and Neck surgery Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is evolving as a key treatment option for benign and malignant lesions in the oropharynx. Even so, postoperative pain is one of the primary early complaints following TORS. Well established evidence-based procedure specific pain treatment guidelines are available for a variety of other surgical specialties. However, there are no guidelines for TORS.

AIM

This review describes the available data of early pain intensity following TORS during rest and procedure related activity.

METHODS

Literature concerning pain in the immediate postoperative phase following TORS were obtained from two literature databases.

RESULTS

Most data on pain intensity following TORS are based upon a numeric rating scale, e.g. the Visual Analogue Scale and/or analgesic demands. Only one randomized clinical trial is available reflecting that the literature is mainly based on retrospective and a few prospective studies. Only one study analyzed pain during relevant functionality, i.e. swallowing. Overall, the studies suffer from a non-standardized approach and there is a need for transparent information concerning the timing of pain ratings and methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for optimal pain control is limited, particularly during surgical relevant activity. Postoperative pain rating during activity is a fundamental element in pain trials in order to enhance recovery thereby calling for future consensus on assessment methodology.