Use of the comprehensive geriatric assessment for the prediction of postoperative complications in elderly patients with head and neck cancer

Elective Surgery Trends and Outcomes of Nonagenarians and Centenarians in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A NSQIP Study

OBJECTIVE

To describe types and outcomes of elective otolaryngological surgeries undergone by patients ≥90 years of age and to assess whether very old age is an independent risk factor for postsurgical complications and death.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a validated national prospective surgical outcomes database, was used to identify all patients aged 65 years and older who underwent elective otolaryngological procedures from 2011 to 2020. Study outcomes included minor complications, major life-threatening complications, and 30-day mortality. Predictors of outcomes, including frailty, were identified using univariable analyses and age was added into the final logistic regression models with stepwise selection.

RESULTS

A total of 40,723 patients met inclusion criteria; 629 (1.5%) patients were ≥90 years of age. Of the 63,389 procedures, head and neck (67.6%) and facial plastics and reconstructive (15.0%) procedures were most common. The overall incidence of major life-threatening complications, minor complications, and death was 2.0%, 3.5%, and 0.4%, respectively. Age ≥90 was significantly associated with an increased risk for 30-day mortality, but not with major or minor postoperative complications. A high modified frailty index was significantly associated with an increased risk for major postoperative complications and death amongst patients ≥90 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective otolaryngological surgery can be safe in relatively healthy nonagenarians and centenarians, though there is a small increased risk of 30-day mortality. Although older age can predispose patients to other comorbidities, age alone should not deter surgeons and patients from considering elective otolaryngological procedures. Frailty may be a better predictor for surgical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV Laryngoscope, 134:3989-3996, 2024.

How representative are participants in geriatric oncology clinical trials? The case of the 5C RCT in geriatric oncology: A cross-sectional comparison to a geriatric oncology clinic

INTRODUCTION

Frail older adults make up a substantial portion of the older adult population. However, frail patients are often excluded from randomized controlled trials. This underrepresentation restricts the extent to which trial findings can be generalized to this population. We compared a sample from the Canadian 5C Randomized Controlled Trial investigating comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in the geriatric oncology setting in terms of frailty to patients referred to the Older Adults with Cancer Clinic (OACC) to determine if the trial sample was representative of the normal geriatric oncology practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Baseline CGA data of 5C Trial participants seen at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM), were compared to data from OACC patients that were seen during the duration of the 5C trial (between April 2018 and April 2020) and that satisfied the 5C inclusion criteria. To assess the frailty of samples, sex, age, disease site, comorbidity level, medical optimization, social supports, functional status, falls risk, nutrition, cognition, and mood were compared between 5C participants and OACC patients using Fisher's exact and independent samples t-test.

RESULTS

A sample of 115 5C participants and 205 OACC patients were included. The mean age of 5C participants and OACC patients was 75.4 and 81.6 years, respectively (p < 0.001). The distribution of disease sites was significantly different between the samples (p < 0.001) and OACC patients were also significantly more impaired compared to 5C participants in comorbidity (23.4% versus 10.4% high comorbidity) (p = 0.001), IADL dependence (55.1% versus 42.6%) (p = 0.036), impaired physical function (70.6% versus 31.3%) (p < 0.001), falls risk (67.8% versus 27%) (p < 0.001), impaired nutrition (55.6% versus 40.9%) (p = 0.014), and cognition (47.2% versus 10%) (p < 0.001). There were no differences in sex, medication optimization, poor social supports, and impaired mood between the samples.

DISCUSSION

The 5C sample was less frail and younger than patients seen in the geriatric oncology clinic. Finding strategies to address barriers to the inclusion of frailer older adults is important to increase their representation in future trials to allow findings to be generalized to this vulnerable population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT03154671.

Multi-Domain Screening: Identification of Patient's Risk Profile Prior to Head-and-Neck Cancer Treatment

BACKGROUND

Head-and-neck cancer (HNC) can give rise to oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD), malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty. Early identification of these phenomena in newly diagnosed HNC patients is important to reduce the risk of complications and to improve treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was (1) to determine the prevalence of the risk of OD, malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty; and (2) to investigate the relation between these phenomena and patients' age, performance status, and cancer group staging.

METHODS

Patients (N = 128) underwent multi-domain screening consisting of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 for OD, Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire and BMI for malnutrition, Short Physical Performance Battery and Hand Grip Strength for sarcopenia, and Distress Thermometer and Maastricht Frailty Screening Tool for frailty.

RESULTS

26.2%, 31.0%, 73.0%, and 46.4% of the patients were at risk for OD, malnutrition, sarcopenia, or frailty, respectively. Patients with an advanced cancer stage had a significantly higher risk of OD and high levels of distress prior to cancer treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified the risk profile of newly diagnosed HNC patients using a standardized 'quick and easy' multi-domain screening prior to cancer treatment.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Quality of Life Aspects in Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC)

To define frailty in older cancer patients, the aim of this study was to assess the geriatric status and quality of life (QoL) aspects in patients suffering from recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (r/m HNSCC) under palliative treatment. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) was performed on 21 r/m HNSCC patients at two defined assessments, and the QoL aspects and the impact of descriptive data were evaluated. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Spearman's rho correlation, and two-way mixed ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. All patients were found to be "frail". Pain, fatigue, and the burden of illness were the highest-rated symptoms. Oral function and orofacial appearance were highly impaired. A significant impact of descriptive data on the CGA and QoL results was found (all p ≤ 0.05). Thus, the CGA results revealed high frailty, severe comorbidities, and high impairments in QoL aspects. The CGA and QoL results were negatively affected by the primary HNSCC treatment approach, the need for prosthetic treatment, and worse oral functional capacity. Therefore, frailty in r/m HNSCC patients seems to be multidimensional. The evaluation of the CGA and QoL aspects in r/m HNSCC patients can be recommended to detect special needs, organize aftercare, and improve the support for frail and vulnerable cancer patients to create a multidisciplinary treatment approach.

Outcomes of comprehensive geriatric assessment and surgical management in head and neck cancers of the elderly: an observational study

AIM

The aims of this study were to assess the survival benefit of optimal vs suboptimal management in elderly patients presenting with upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) cancer for which surgery was the standard of care, and determine if comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) was a prognostic factor for survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2014 to December 2018. Included patients were aged 70 or older at the time of diagnosis, and presented with UADT cancer with a theoretical indication for curative-intent surgery according to international guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients were included, with a median age of 78 years. Treatment included surgery in 67.6% of cases and was considered optimal in 60.6% of patients. The overall 3-year survival was 55.2%, and was significantly better in case of optimal vs suboptimal treatment (74.5% vs 25.8%, p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, factors associated with a significantly improved 3-year survival included surgery (p < 0.001), age < 80 years, performance status < 2 and G8 score > 14. In multivariate analysis, CGA was associated with a better survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients aged over 70 presenting with UADT cancer for which the standard of care is surgery, an optimal management is associated with better overall survival. Receiving a CGA seems to provide a survival benefit in patients with a G8 score ≤ 14, through an optimization of the care pathway before and after the cancer treatment.

Convenient Decision Criteria for Surgery in Elderly Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Elderly patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have difficulty undergoing curative surgical treatment due to various factors besides age. The purpose of the present study was to study the factors determining surgery in elderly patients with OSCC. We designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study. The study sample included elderly patients aged ≥ 70 years with OSCC and they were statistically compared between the surgery and non-surgery groups. The primary outcome variable was selecting surgery as the treatment plan, while the secondary outcome was the prognosis of each group. The sample comprised 76 patients aged ≥ 70 years with OSCC, of whom 52 treated with surgery and 24 patients treated with non-surgery. As decision factors, performance status (PS), clinical stage, serum Alb level, body mass index (BMI), and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) were significantly associated with the selection of surgery. Logistic multivariate analysis identified three independent predictive factors for selecting surgery: Alb (≥3.5 vs. <3.5), PS (0, 1, 2, 3), and clinical stage. According to the decision tree analysis, curative surgery is the recommended treatment strategy for elderly patients with Alb ≥ 3.5 g/dL, PS 0, and stage I, II. In conclusion, Alb, PS, and clinical stage may be the criteria for selecting surgery in elderly patients.

"Age is just a number"; frailty as a marker of peri-operative risk in head and neck surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Frailty refers to a patient's reduced capacity to withstand stressors due to a reduction in physiologic reserves. We assessed the impact of frailty on outcomes following head and neck surgery.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies incorporating 182 059 patients were included in qualitative synthesis with 15 953 (8.8%) of patients deemed as frail. Meta-analysis incorporating nine studies demonstrated that frailty is associated with an increased 30 day postoperative morbidity (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.98-3.80; p < 0.01) and meta-analysis with six studies suggested increased 30-day mortality (OR 2.94; 95% CI 2.62-3.31; p < 0.01). Preliminary meta-analyses between two and five studies suggested that frail patients had reduced overall survival and were more likely to be discharged to a nonhome location or readmitted within 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty appears to be associated with poor short-term outcomes following head and neck surgery and may improve understanding of an individual patient's peri-operative risk.

[Frailty in Head and Neck Oncology]

Since treatment of elderly patients with head and neck cancer is often challenging due to preexisting comorbidities, continuous efforts are required to raise awareness for frailty, which is a multidimensional state of diminished physiologic reserve resulting in decreased resiliency and increased vulnerability to stressors. Frailty is a predictor of poor clinical outcomes in head and neck cancer patients, but until now there is no standardization of frailty assessment. Pretherapeutic frailty assessment among head and neck cancer patients should be incorporated into routine multidisciplinary management to predict adverse outcomes and tailor a personalized treatment. This article would like to explain the complex syndrome frailty and its importance for head and neck oncology.