Drug idiosyncrasy due to pirfenidone presenting as acute liver failure: Case report and mini-review of the literature

A natural small molecule alleviates liver fibrosis by targeting apolipoprotein L2

Liver fibrosis is an urgent clinical problem without effective therapies. Here we conducted a high-content screening on a natural Euphorbiaceae diterpenoid library to identify a potent anti-liver fibrosis lead, 12-deoxyphorbol 13-palmitate (DP). Leveraging a photo-affinity labeling approach, apolipoprotein L2 (APOL2), an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-rich protein, was identified as the direct target of DP. Mechanistically, APOL2 is induced in activated hepatic stellate cells upon transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) stimulation, which then binds to sarcoplasmic/ER calcium ATPase 2 (SERCA2) to trigger ER stress and elevate its downstream protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK)-hairy and enhancer of split 1 (HES1) axis, ultimately promoting liver fibrosis. As a result, targeting APOL2 by DP or ablation of APOL2 significantly impairs APOL2-SERCA2-PERK-HES1 signaling and mitigates fibrosis progression. Our findings not only define APOL2 as a novel therapeutic target for liver fibrosis but also highlight DP as a promising lead for treatment of this symptom.

Comparison of the safety profiles for pirfenidone and nintedanib: a disproportionality analysis of the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system

Background

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive interstitial lung disease of unknown etiology. Pirfenidone (PFD) and nintedanib (NDN) were both conditionally recommended in the clinical practice guideline published in 2015. Safety and tolerability are related to the risk of treatment discontinuation. Therefore, this study evaluated and compared the adverse events (AEs) of PFD and NDN in a large real-world population by analyzing data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to provide a reference for their rational and safe use.

Methods

The AEs of PFD and NDN were extracted from the FAERS database. The pharmacovigilance online analysis tool OpenVigil 2.1 was used to retrieve data from the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2012 to the second quarter of 2022. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio were used to detect the risk signals.

Results

The database included 26,728 and 11,720 reports for PFD and NDN, respectively. The most frequent AEs of PFD and NDN were gastrointestinal disorders. The RORs for these drugs were 5.874 and 5.899, respectively. "Cardiac disorders" was the most statistically significant system order class for NDN with an ROR of 9.382 (95% confidence interval = 8.308-10.594). Furthermore, the numbers of designated medical events of PFD and NDN were 552 and 656, respectively. Notably, liver injury was reported more frequently for NDN (11.096%) than for PFD (6.076%).

Conclusion

This study revealed differences in the reporting of AEs between PFD and NDN. The findings provide reference for physicians in clinical practice. Attention should be paid to the risks of cardiac disorders and liver injury associated with NDN.

Risk of potential hepatotoxicity from pirfenidone or nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: results of a retrospective analysis of a large insurance database in Taiwan

Background: A growing population of individuals diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are receiving treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) associated with the use of pirfenidone and nintedanib in patients with IPF in Taiwan. Methods: We collected a cohort of adult patients diagnosed with IPF between 2017 and 2020. The research outcomes involved assessing the incidence of DILI in patients treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone. Poisson regression analysis was employed to estimate incidence rates, with and without adjustments for covariates, to calculate and present both unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Results: The risk of DILI was greater in patients who received nintedanib than in those who received pirfenidone during the 1-year follow-up. Patients treated with nintedanib exhibited a heightened risk of DILI based on inpatient diagnoses using specific codes after adjusting for variables such as gender, age group, comorbidities and concomitant medications, with an adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) of 3.62 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-11.78). Similarly, the risk of DILI was elevated in patients treated with nintedanib according to a per-protocol Poisson regression analysis of outcomes identified from inpatient diagnoses using specific codes. This was observed after adjusting for variables including gender, age group, comorbidities, and concomitant medications, with an aIRR of 3.60 (95% CI 1.11-11.72). Conclusion: Data from postmarketing surveillance in Taiwan indicate that patients who received nintedanib have a greater risk of DILI than do those who received pirfenidone.

Pirfenidone affects human cardiac fibroblast proliferation and cell cycle activity in 2D cultures and engineered connective tissues

The anti-fibrotic drug pirfenidone (PFD) is currently in clinical testing for the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; however, its effects on human cardiac cells have not been fully investigated. Therefore, we aimed to characterize the impact of PFD on human cardiac fibroblasts (CF) in 2D culture as well as in 3D-engineered connective tissues (ECT). We analyzed proliferation by automated cell counting and changes in signaling by immunoblotting. We generated ECT with different geometries to modify the cellular phenotype and investigated the effects of PFD on cell number and viability as well as on cell cycle activity. We further studied its effect on ECT compaction, contraction, stiffening, and strain resistance by ECT imaging, pole deflection analysis, and ultimate tensile testing. Our data demonstrate that PFD inhibits human CF proliferation in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 of 0.43 mg/ml and its anti-mitogenic effect was further corroborated by an inhibition of MEK1/2, ERK1/2, and riboprotein S6 (rpS6) phosphorylation. In ECT, a lower cell cycle activity was found in PFD-treated ECT and fewer cells resided in these ECT after 5 days of culture compared to the control. Moreover, ECT compaction as well as ECT contraction was impaired. Consequently, biomechanical analyses demonstrated that PFD reduced the stiffness of ECT. Taken together, our data demonstrate that the anti-fibrotic action of PFD on human CF is based on its anti-mitogenic effect in 2D cultures and ECT.

Development of lumen-based perfusable 3D liver in vitro model using single-step bioprinting with composite bioinks

Hepatic sinusoids are uniquely organized structures that help maintain a spectrum of hepatic functions. Although several in vitro liver models have been developed to replicate liver sinusoids, most of these platforms require complex, multi-step fabrication methods making it difficult to achieve truly three-dimensional (3D) channel geometries. In this study, a single-step bioprinting technique was demonstrated to simultaneously print a chip platform and develop a perfusable vascularized liver sinusoid in vitro model. The integrated system uses a co-axial-based bioprinting approach to develop a liver sinusoid-like model that consists of a sacrificial core compartment containing a perfusable pre-vascular structure and an alginate-collagen-based shell compartment containing hepatocytes. The lumen-based perfusable 3D liver sinusoid-on-a-chip (LSOC-P) demonstrated significantly better hepatocyte viability, proliferation, and liver-specific gene and protein expression compared to a 3D hepatocyte-based core/shell model with static media and the standard hepatocyte-based 2D sandwich culture system. A drug toxicity evaluation of hepatotoxins highlighted the comparatively higher sensitivity of the LSOC system with a close estimation of the therapeutic range of safe drug concentrations for humans. In conclusion, the current findings indicate that the combinatorial single-step co-axial bioprinting technique is a promising fabrication approach for the development of a perfusable LSOC platform for drug screening applications.

SARS-CoV-2-mediated liver injury: pathophysiology and mechanisms of disease

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2-induced severe inflammatory response can be associated with severe medical consequences leading to multi-organ failure, including the liver. The main mechanism behind this assault is the aggressive cytokine storm that induces cytotoxicity in various organs. Of interest, hepatic stellate cells (HSC) respond acutely to liver injury through several molecular mechanisms, hence furthering the perpetuation of the cytokine storm and its resultant tissue damage. In addition, hepatocytes undergo apoptosis or necrosis resulting in the release of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrogenic mediators that lead to chronic liver inflammation.

AIMS

The aim of this review is to summarize available data on SARS-CoV-2-induced liver inflammation in addition to evaluate the potential effect of anti-inflammatory drugs in attenuating SARS-CoV-2-induced liver inflammation.

METHODS

Thorough PubMed search was done to gather and summarize published data on SARS-CoV-2-induced liver inflammation. Additionally, various anti-inflammatory potential treatments were also documented.

RESULTS

Published data documented SARS-CoV-2 infection of liver tissues and is prominent in most liver cells. Also, histological analysis showed various features of tissues damage, e.g., hepatocellular necrosis, mitosis, cellular infiltration, and fatty degeneration in addition to microvesicular steatosis and inflammation. Finally, the efficacy of the different drugs used to treat SARS-CoV-2-induced liver injury, in particular the anti-inflammatory remedies, are likely to have some beneficial effect to treat liver injury in COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

SARS-CoV-2-induced liver inflammation is a serious condition, and drugs with potent anti-inflammatory effect can play a major role in preventing irreversible liver damage in COVID-19.

Current strategies for targeted therapy of liver fibrosis

Liver fibrosis (LF) is an unfavorable event in the natural course of chronic liver diseases (CLD), therefore, early implementation and widespread use of antifibrotic therapy methods is a pressing issue in hepatology. The aim of the review was to describe current approaches to targeted therapy of LF.

PubMed database, Google Scholar search engine, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, eLIBRARY.RU scientific electronic library, as well as reference lists of articles were used to search for scientific articles. The publications that corresponded to the aim of the study were selected for the period from 1998 to 2021 by the terms “liver fibrosis”, “pathogenesis”, and “treatment”. Inclusion criteria were restricted to targeted therapy of LF.

Despite the growing evidence for reversibility of LF, there are currently no effective or clinically approved regimens for its specific therapy. However, taking into account the relevance of the issue, scientific research in this area is necessary. Multiple drugs with a good safety profile have been studied, which, though intended for other purposes, can have a positive effect on LF. In addition, a number of innovative approaches that differ from pharmacotherapy inspire optimism about finding a solution to this problem. It is obvious that studies focused on well-characterized groups of patients with confirmed histologic, elastography, clinical, and radiological parameters are required. This is a challenging task, since the key point will be stratification of risk based on ethnicity, etiology, and clinical status, and very large samples will be required for a reliable assessment. Nevertheless, the solution will increase efficiency of treatment for patients with CLD, improve their prognosis and quality of life, and significantly reduce the need for liver transplantation, a demand for which remains extremely high worldwide.

Hydronidone for the Treatment of Liver Fibrosis Related to Chronic Hepatitis B: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatitis B virus infection frequently leads to liver fibrosis and is the leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis in Asia Pacific. Pirfenidone is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and hydronidone is a novel structural modification of pirfenidone with the aim of reducing hepatoxicity. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of hydronidone in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-associated liver fibrosis.

METHODS

This was a 52-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study at 8 centers in China. Patients with CHB with biopsied documented liver fibrosis were eligible and were randomly assigned into receiving daily placebo or hydronidone orally (180 mg/day, 270 mg/day, or 360 mg/day). All enrolled subjects also received entecavir 0.5 mg/day. A second liver biopsy was performed at week 52. The primary endpoint was defined as fibrosis improvement (reduction of at least 1 Ishak score at week 52 of treatment).

RESULTS

From June 25, 2015, to September 5, 2019, 168 patients with CHB and liver fibrosis met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were subsequently randomized, 43 in the placebo group and 125 in the hydronidone groups (42 in the 180-mg group, 42 in the 270-mg group, and 41 in the 360-mg group). The fibrosis improvement endpoint was achieved by 11 patients (25.6%) in the placebo group and 17 patients (40.5%) in the 180-mg group (P = .12), 23 patients (54.8%) in the 270-mg group (P = .006), and 18 patients (43.90%) in the 360-mg group (P = .08). The improvement rate was 58 of 125 (46.4%) in the combined hydronidone group (P = .014). The overall safety profile and incidence of serious adverse events were similar among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydronidone plus entecavir showed clinically significant histological improvement of liver fibrosis in patients with CHB, and the dose of 270 mg showed the best efficacy of fibrosis regression. Further studies are required to assess the long-term effectiveness of hydronidone in regression of hepatic fibrosis.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov number, NCT02499562.

Case Report: Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) and Candida auris Fungemia in Post-acute COVID-19 Syndrome: A Clinical Challenge

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection causes a disease (COVID-19) with multisystem involvement. The world is now entering a phase of post-COVID-19 manifestations in this pandemic. Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory event triggered by viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2. Both Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome-Adults (MIS-A) and Cytokine Storm Syndrome (CSS) are considered close differentials of sHLH and add to the spectrum of Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS). In this report, we presented the case of a middle-aged Asian man who was initially discharged upon recovery from severe COVID-19 infection after 17 days of hospitalization to a private institute and later came to our hospital 13 days post-discharge. Here, he was diagnosed with sHLH, occurring as an extension of CSS, with delayed presentation falling within the spectrum of PACS. The diagnosis of sHLH was made holistically with the HLH-2004 criteria. Our patient initially responded to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and dexamethasone, later complicated by disseminated Candida auris infection and had a fatal outcome. Though many cases of HLH during active COVID-19 and a few cases post COVID-19 recovery have been reported, based on H-score, which has limitations as a diagnostic tool. We report the first case report of post-COVID-19 sHLH using the HLH-2004 criteria, complicated by disseminated Candidemia, emphasizing that the care of patients with COVID-19 does not conclude at the time of hospital discharge. We highlight the importance of surveillance in the post-COVID phase for early detection of sHLH which may predispose to fatal opportunistic infections (OIs).

New Drugs for Hepatic Fibrosis

The morbidity and mortality of hepatic fibrosis caused by various etiologies are high worldwide, and the trend is increasing annually. At present, there is no effective method to cure hepatic fibrosis except liver transplantation, and its serious complications threaten the health of patients and cause serious medical burdens. Additionally, there is no specific drug for the treatment of hepatic fibrosis, and many drugs with anti-hepatic fibrosis effects are in the research and development stage. Recently, remarkable progress has been made in the research and development of anti-hepatic fibrosis drugs targeting different targets. We searched websites such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Home-ClinicalTrials.gov and found approximately 120 drugs with anti-fibrosis properties, some of which are in phase Ⅱ or Ⅲ clinical trials. Additionally, although these drugs are effective against hepatic fibrosis in animal models, most clinical trials have shown poor results, mainly because animal models do not capture the complexity of human hepatic fibrosis. Besides, the effect of natural products on hepatic fibrosis has not been widely recognized at home and abroad. Furthermore, drugs targeting a single anti-hepatic fibrosis target are prone to adverse reactions. Therefore, currently, the treatment of hepatic fibrosis requires a combination of drugs that target multiple targets. Ten new drugs with potential for development against hepatic fibrosis were selected and highlighted in this mini-review, which provides a reference for clinical drug use.

Liver Injury with Nintedanib: A Pharmacovigilance-Pharmacokinetic Appraisal

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with nintedanib has emerged as an adverse event of special interest in premarketing clinical trials. We characterized DILI with nintedanib in the real world and explored the underlying pharmacological basis. First, we assessed serious hepatic events reported to the Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System by combining the disproportionality approach [reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI)] with individual case assessment. Demographic and clinical features were inspected (seriousness, onset, discontinuation, dechallenge/rechallenge, concomitant drugs) to implement an ad hoc causality assessment scoring system. Second, we appraised physiochemical and pharmacokinetic parameters possibly predictive of DILI occurrence. Significant disproportionality was found for nintedanib as compared to pirfenidone (N = 91; ROR = 4.77; 95% CI = 3.15–7.39). Asian population, low body weight (59 kg), and rapid DILI onset (13.5 days) emerged as clinical features. Hospitalization and discontinuation were found in a significant proportion of cases (32% and 36%, respectively). In 24% of the cases, at least two potentially hepatotoxic drugs (statins, proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics) were recorded. Causality was at least possible in 92.3% of the cases. High lipophilicity and predicted in silico inhibition of liver transporters emerged as potential pharmacokinetic features supporting the biological plausibility. Although causality cannot be demonstrated, clinicians should consider early monitoring and medication review on a case-by-case basis.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Current and future treatment

Objectives

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic fibrotic lung disease characterized by dry cough, fatigue, and progressive exertional dyspnea. Lung parenchyma and architecture is destroyed, compliance is lost, and gas exchange is compromised in this debilitating condition that leads inexorably to respiratory failure and death within 3–5 years of diagnosis. This review discusses treatment approaches to IPF in current use and those that appear promising for future development.

Data Source

The data were obtained from the Randomized Controlled Trials and scientific studies published in English literature. We used search terms related to IPF, antifibrotic treatment, lung transplant, and management.

Results

Etiopathogenesis of IPF is not fully understood, and treatment options are limited. Pathological features of IPF include extracellular matrix remodeling, fibroblast activation and proliferation, immune dysregulation, cell senescence, and presence of aberrant basaloid cells. The mainstay therapies are the oral antifibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib, which can improve quality of life, attenuate symptoms, and slow disease progression. Unilateral or bilateral lung transplantation is the only treatment for IPF shown to increase life expectancy.

Conclusion

Clearly, there is an unmet need for accelerated research into IPF mechanisms so that progress can be made in therapeutics toward the goals of increasing life expectancy, alleviating symptoms, and improving well‐being.

Predictive Model for Drug-Induced Liver Injury Using Deep Neural Networks Based on Substructure Space

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major concern for drug developers, regulators, and clinicians. However, there is no adequate model system to assess drug-associated DILI risk in humans. In the big data era, computational models are expected to play a revolutionary role in this field. This study aimed to develop a deep neural network (DNN)-based model using extended connectivity fingerprints of diameter 4 (ECFP4) to predict DILI risk. Each data set for the predictive model was retrieved and curated from DILIrank, LiverTox, and other literature. The best model was constructed through ten iterations of stratified 10-fold cross-validation, and the applicability domain was defined based on integer ECFP4 bits of the training set which represented substructures. For the robustness test, we employed the concept of the endurance level. The best model showed an accuracy of 0.731, a sensitivity of 0.714, and a specificity of 0.750 on the validation data set in the complete applicability domain. The model was further evaluated with four external data sets and attained an accuracy of 0.867 on 15 drugs with DILI cases reported since 2019. Overall, the results suggested that the ECFP4-based DNN model represents a new tool to identify DILI risk for the evaluation of drug safety.

Pirfenidone 5-hydroxylation is mainly catalysed by CYP1A2 and partly catalysed by CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 in the human liver

Pirfenidone is a first-line drug for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The primary metabolic pathways of pirfenidone in humans are 5-hydroxylation and subsequent oxidation to 5-carboxylpirfenidone. The aims of this study were to determine the cytochrome P450 isoforms responsible for pirfenidone 5-hydroxylation and to evaluate their contributions in human liver microsomes (HLM).Among the recombinant P450 isoforms, CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2A6, and CYP2B6 were shown to catalyse the 5-hydroxylation of pirfenidone. Pirfenidone 5-hydroxylase activity by HLM was inhibited by α-naphthoflavone (by 45%), 8-methoxypsolaren (by 84%), tranylcypromine (by 53%), and quinidine (by 15%), which are CYP1A2, CYP1A2/CYP2A6/CYP2C19, CYP2A6/CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 inhibitors, respectively.In 17 individual HLM donors, pirfenidone 5-hydroxylase activity was significantly correlated with phenacetin O-deethylase (r = 0.89, P < 0.001) and S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase activities (r = 0.51, P < 0.05), which are CYP1A2 and CYP2C19 marker activities, respectively.By using the relative activity factors, the contributions of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 to pirfenidone 5-hydroxylation in the human liver were 72.8%, 11.8%, and 8.9%, respectively.In conclusion, we clearly demonstrated the predominant P450 involved in pirfenidone 5-hydroxylation in the human liver is CYP1A2, with CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 playing a minor role.

Pharmacological Interactions of Nintedanib and Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Times of COVID-19 Pandemic

The discovery of antifibrotic agents have resulted in advances in the therapeutic management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Currently, nintedanib and pirfenidone have become the basis of IPF therapy based on the results of large randomized clinical trials showing their safety and efficacy in reducing disease advancement. However, the goal of completely halting disease progress has not been reached yet. Administering nintedanib with add-on pirfenidone is supposed to enhance the therapeutic benefit by simultaneously acting on two different pathogenic pathways. All this becomes more important in the context of the ongoing global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) because of the fibrotic consequences following SARS-CoV-2 infection in some patients. However, little information is available about their drug–drug interaction, which is important mainly in polymedicated patients. The aim of this review is to describe the current management of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILDs) in general and of IPF in particular, focusing on the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between these two drugs and their relationship with other medications in patients with IPF.

Recent developments in predicting CYP-independent metabolism

As lead optimization efforts have successfully reduced metabolic liabilities due to cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated metabolism, there has been an increase in the frequency of involvement of non-CYP enzymes in the metabolism of investigational compounds. Although there have been numerous notable advancements in the characterization of non-CYP enzymes with respect to their localization, reaction mechanisms, species differences and identification of typical substrates, accurate prediction of non-CYP-mediated clearance, with a particular emphasis with the difficulties in accounting for any extrahepatic contributions, remains a challenge. The current manuscript comprehensively summarizes the recent advancements in the prediction of drug metabolism and the in vitro to in vitro extrapolation of clearance for substrates of non-CYP drug metabolizing enzymes.

Hepatic Antifibrotic Pharmacotherapy: Are We Approaching Success?

The incidence rate and mortality of liver fibrosis caused by various etiologies are high throughout the world. Liver fibrosis, the subsequent cirrhosis and other serious related complications threaten the health of patients and represent a serious medical burden; yet, there is still a lack of approved methods to prevent or reverse liver fibrosis. Therefore, effective hepatic antifibrotic drugs are urgently needed. The activation and proliferation of hepatic stellate cells are still the mechanisms of fibrosis that remain the focus of therapeutic research. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the development and applicability of antifibrosis drugs. In this review, we summarize the effectiveness and safety of available antifibrosis drugs utilizing different targets. In addition, some characteristics of antifibrosis drugs in phase II and III trials are introduced in detail.

Repurposing Pirfenidone for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis-related Cirrhosis: A Case Series

We repurposed the antifibrotic drug pirfenidone-which is approved for treatment of idiopathic lung fibrosis-in a series of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis. Our report demonstrates the observed improvements in necroinflammation and regression of cirrhosis with pirfenidone use for 12-weeks, associated with classical hepatic repair complex features on follow-up liver biopsies. This novel work could help stimulate further randomized trials of pirfenidone in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related liver fibrosis or cirrhosis, for whom no recommended drug treatments exists currently.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Highlights of the Recent Literature

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), herbal-induced liver injury, and herbal and dietary supplement (HDS)-induced liver injury are an important aspect of drug safety. Knowledge regarding responsible drugs, mechanisms, risk factors, and the diagnostic tools to detect liver injury have continued to grow in the past year. This review highlights what we considered the most significant publications from among more than 1800 articles relating to liver injury from medications, herbal products, and dietary supplements in 2017 and 2018. The US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study highlighted several areas of ongoing study, including the potential utility of human leukocyte antigens and microRNAs as DILI risk factors and new data on racial differences, the role of alcohol consumption, factors associated with prognosis, and updates on the clinical signatures of autoimmune DILI, thiopurines, and HDS agents. Novel data were also generated from the Spanish and Latin American DILI registries as well as from Chinese and Korean case series. A few new agents causing DILI were added to the growing list in the past 2 years, including sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, as were new aspects of chemotherapy-associated liver injury. A number of cases reported previously described hepatotoxins confirmed via the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM; e.g., norethisterone, methylprednisolone, glatiramer acetate) and/or the DILIN method (e.g., celecoxib, dimethyl fumarate). Additionally, much work centered on elucidating the pathophysiology of DILI, including the importance of bile salt export pumps and immune-mediated mechanisms. Finally, it must be noted that, while hundreds of new studies described DILI in 2017-2018, the quality of such reports must always be addressed. Björnsson reminds us to remain very critical of the data when addressing the future utility of a study, which is why it is so important to adhere to a standardized method such as RUCAM when determining DILI causality. While drug-induced hepatotoxicity remains a diagnosis of exclusion, the diverse array of publications that appeared in 2017 and 2018 provided important advances in our understanding of DILI, paving the way for our improved ability to make a more definitive diagnosis and risk assessment.

Pirfenidone alleviates concanavalin A-induced liver fibrosis in mice

AIMS

Liver fibrosis (LF) is a life-threatening complication of most chronic liver diseases resulting from a variety of injurious agents and hepatotoxic insults. To date, there are no specific therapies for LF, and all the currently available drugs have been developed for other indications. Thus, there is a pressing need to develop new drugs for treatment of LF. Therefore, the current study aimed to elucidate the potential antifibrotic effect of Pirfenidone (PFD) against concanavalin A (ConA)-induced immunological model of liver fibrosis in mice.

MAIN METHODS

Hepatic fibrosis was induced in mice by injecting ConA (10 mg/kg/wk./i.v) for 4 weeks. Then, the mice were treated with or without PFD (125 mg/kg/ip/day) for 2 weeks. Hepatic fibrosis was determined by Masson Trichrome staining; Haematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining, immunohistochemistry staining of type II and IV collagens, and colorimetric assessment of hydroxyprolline (HP) content in the liver tissues. In addition, the expression of α-SMA mRNA was determined by real time RT-PCR. The serum levels of TGF-β, TNF-α, TIMP-1 and MMP-2 were measured by ELISA.

KEY FINDINGS

Treatment with PFD significantly reduced ConA-induced expression of type II and IV collagens, α-SMA mRNA expression, and HP content and decreased inflammatory cells infiltration in hepatic tissues. Furthermore, serum levels of TGF-β, TNF-α, and TIMP-1 were significantly reduced with concomitant increase in MMP-2 expression.

SIGNIFICANCE

Treatment with PFD ameliorates concanavalin A-induced hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in mice. Thus, PFD may represent a promising therapeutic option for hepatic fibrosis and its related complications.

Management of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Objective: Provide information for pharmacists on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and its treatment. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All articles with data from randomized controlled trials of nintedanib or pirfenidone were reviewed. Data Synthesis: IPF is a progressive and ultimately fatal interstitial lung disease characterized by decline in lung function and worsening dyspnea. It is uncommon and mainly occurs in individuals aged >60 years, particularly men with a history of smoking. Nintedanib and pirfenidone were approved in the United States for the treatment of IPF in 2014 and received conditional recommendations in the 2015 American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/Latin American Thoracic Association treatment guidelines. These drugs slow the progression of IPF by reducing the rate of decline in lung function. Their adverse event profile is characterized mainly by gastrointestinal events, which can be managed through dose adjustment and symptom management. Management of IPF should also include smoking cessation, vaccinations, and supportive care such as patient education, pulmonary rehabilitation, and the use of supplemental oxygen as well as optimizing the management of comorbidities. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review provides clinical pharmacists with information on the course of IPF, what can be expected of current treatments, and how to help patients manage their drug therapy. Conclusions: IPF is a progressive disease, but treatments are available that can slow the progression of the disease. Clinical pharmacists can play an important role in the care of patients with IPF through patient education, monitoring medication compliance and safety, ensuring drugs for comorbidities are optimized, and preventive strategies such as immunizations.

Reversion of in vivo fibrogenesis by novel chromone scaffolds

BACKGROUND

Myofibroblasts are known to play a key role in the development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Two drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are the only approved therapeutic options for IPF, but their applications are limited due to their side effects. Thus, curative IPF drugs represent a huge unmet medical need.

METHODS

A mouse hepatic stellate cell (HSC) line was established that could robustly differentiate into myofibroblasts upon treatment with TGF-β. Eupatilin was assessed in diseased human lung fibroblasts from IPF patients (DHLFs) as well as in human lung epithelial cells (HLECs). The drug's performance was extensively tested in a bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis model (BLM). Global gene expression studies and proteome analysis were performed.

FINDINGS

Eupatilin attenuated disease severity of BLM in both preventative and therapeutic studies. The drug inhibited the in vitro transdifferantiation of DHLFs to myofibroblasts upon stimulation with TGF-β. No such induction of the in vitro transdifferantiation was observed in TGF-β treated HLECs. Specific carbons of eupatilin were essential for its anti-fibrotic activity. Eupatilin was capable of dismantling latent TGF-β complex, specifically by eliminating expression of the latent TGF-β binding protein 1 (LTBP1), in ECM upon actin depolymerization. Unlike eupatilin, pirfenidone was unable to block fibrosis of DHLFs or HSCs stimulated with TGF-β. Eupatilin attenuated phosphorylation of Smad3 by TGF-β. Eupatilin induced myofibroblasts to dedifferentiate into intermediate HCS-like cells.

INTERPRETATION

Eupatilin may act directly on pathogenic myofibroblasts, disarming them, whereas the anti-fibrotic effect of pirfenidone may be indirect. Eupatilin could increase the efficacy of IPF treatment to curative levels.