Hippocampus NMDA receptors selectively mediate latent extinction of place learning

The role of glutamate NMDA receptors of the mediodorsal thalamus in scopolamine-induced amnesia in rats

The current study was designed to examine the role of glutamate NMDA receptors of the mediodorsal thalamus (MD) in scopolamine-induced memory impairment. Adult male rats were bilaterally cannulated into the MD. According to the results, intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of scopolamine (1.5 mg/kg) immediately after the training phase (post-training) impaired memory consolidation. Bilateral microinjection of the glutamate NMDA receptors agonist, N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA; 0.05 µg/rat), into the MD significantly improved scopolamine-induced memory consolidation impairment. Co-administration of D-AP5, a glutamate NMDA receptor antagonist (0.001-0.005 µg/rat, intra-MD) potentiated the response of an ineffective dose of scopolamine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) to impair memory consolidation, mimicking the response of a higher dose of scopolamine. Noteworthy, post-training intra-MD microinjections of the same doses of NMDA or D-AP5 alone had no effect on memory consolidation. Moreover, the blockade of the glutamate NMDA receptors by 0.003 ng/rat of D-AP5 prevented the improving effect of NMDA on scopolamine-induced amnesia. Thus, it can be concluded that the MD glutamatergic system may be involved in scopolamine-induced memory impairment via the NMDA receptor signaling pathway.

The expression of m6A enzymes in the hippocampus of diabetic cognitive impairment mice and the possible improvement of YTHDF1

Cognitive impairment is a severe diabetes-related complication and seriously challenges the demand for future health resources. However, the potential therapeutic targets and mechanisms are not fully understood. Herein, we investigated the expression of the m6A enzyme in the hippocampus of mice with diabetes-induced cognitive impairment and possible improvement with overexpression of YTHDF1. A type 1 diabetes (T1D) mouse model was established by streptozotocin (STZ) intraperitoneal injection. Diabetic mice showed significant cognitive dysfunction, which was detected by novel object recognition tests and novel place recognition tests. Western blot analysis showed that compared with the control group, the protein levels of YTHDC2 and ALKBH5 were significantly upregulated in the hippocampus in the STZ group, while the expression of YTHDF1, YTHDF3 and WTAP was significantly downregulated. Furthermore, overexpression of YTHDF1 by AAV-YTHDF1 injection in the hippocampus significantly improved STZ-induced diabetic cognitive dysfunction. These results indicate that the m6A enzyme may play a key role in the cognitive dysfunction induced by diabetes, and YTHDF1 may be a promising therapeutic target.

Place vs. Response Learning: History, Controversy, and Neurobiology

The present article provides a historical review of the place and response learning plus-maze tasks with a focus on the behavioral and neurobiological findings. The article begins by reviewing the conflict between Edward C. Tolman's cognitive view and Clark L. Hull's stimulus-response (S-R) view of learning and how the place and response learning plus-maze tasks were designed to resolve this debate. Cognitive learning theorists predicted that place learning would be acquired faster than response learning, indicating the dominance of cognitive learning, whereas S-R learning theorists predicted that response learning would be acquired faster, indicating the dominance of S-R learning. Here, the evidence is reviewed demonstrating that either place or response learning may be dominant in a given learning situation and that the relative dominance of place and response learning depends on various parametric factors (i.e., amount of training, visual aspects of the learning environment, emotional arousal, et cetera). Next, the neurobiology underlying place and response learning is reviewed, providing strong evidence for the existence of multiple memory systems in the mammalian brain. Research has indicated that place learning is principally mediated by the hippocampus, whereas response learning is mediated by the dorsolateral striatum. Other brain regions implicated in place and response learning are also discussed in this section, including the dorsomedial striatum, amygdala, and medial prefrontal cortex. An exhaustive review of the neurotransmitter systems underlying place and response learning is subsequently provided, indicating important roles for glutamate, dopamine, acetylcholine, cannabinoids, and estrogen. Closing remarks are made emphasizing the historical importance of the place and response learning tasks in resolving problems in learning theory, as well as for examining the behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms of multiple memory systems. How the place and response learning tasks may be employed in the future for examining extinction, neural circuits of memory, and human psychopathology is also briefly considered.

There Is More Than One Kind of Extinction Learning

The view that different kinds of memory are mediated by dissociable neural systems has received extensive experimental support. Dissociations between memory systems are usually observed during initial acquisition, consolidation, and retrieval of memory, however increasing evidence also indicates a role for multiple memory systems in extinction behavior. The present article reviews a recent series of maze learning experiments that provide evidence for a multiple memory systems approach to extinction learning and memory. Evidence is described indicating that: (1) the hippocampus and dorsolateral striatum (DLS) mediate different kinds of extinction learning; (2) the effectiveness of different extinction protocols depends on the kind of memory being extinguished; and (3) whether a neural system is involved in extinction is also determined by the extinction protocol and kind of memory undergoing extinction. Based on these findings, a novel hypothetical model regarding the role of multiple memory systems in extinction is presented. In addition, the relevance of this multiple memory systems approach to other learning paradigms involving extinction (i.e., extinction of conditioned fear) and for treating human psychopathologies characterized by maladaptive memories (e.g., drug addiction and relapse) is briefly considered.

Ouabain increases neuronal branching in hippocampus and improves spatial memory

Previous research shows Ouabain (OUA) to bind Na, K-ATPase, thereby triggering a number of signaling pathways, including the transcription factors NFᴋB and CREB. These transcription factors play a key role in the regulation of BDNF and WNT-β-catenin signaling cascades, which are involved in neuroprotection and memory regulation. This study investigated the effects of OUA (10 nM) in the modulation of the principal signaling pathways involved in morphological plasticity and memory formation in the hippocampus of adult rats. The results show intrahippocampal injection of OUA 10 nM to activate the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway and to increase CREB/BDNF and NFᴋB levels. These effects contribute to important changes in the cellular microenvironment, resulting in enhanced levels of dendritic branching in hippocampal neurons, in association with an improvement in spatial reference memory and the inhibition of long-term memory extinction.