Closed-incision negative pressure therapy at -125 mmHg significantly reduces surgical site complications following total hip and knee arthroplasties: A stratified meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The impact of negative pressure wound therapy on surgical wound infection, hospital stay and postoperative complications after spinal surgery: A meta-analysis

To systematically assess the effect of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on postoperative surgical wound infection, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications after spinal surgery. Relevant studies on the application of NPWT in spinal surgery were conducted via a computerised database search, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang, from inception to June 2023. The identified literature was rigorously screened and data extraction was performed by two investigators independently. The quality of the relevant studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The effect size for count data was determined by the odds ratio (OR), while the impact size for measurement data was expressed as the standardised mean difference (SMD). The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for each effect magnitude. Stata 17.0 software was used for the meta-analysis. Ten papers, totalling 1448 patients, were finally included. This study demonstrated that NPWT led to a statistically significant reduction in the occurrence of postoperative surgical wound infections (OR: 0.377, 95% CI: 0.238-0.598, p < 0.001), fewer postoperative complications (OR: 0.526, 95% CI: 0.360-0.770, p = 0.001) and a shortened hospital stay (SMD: -0.678, 95%CI: -1.324 to -0.031, p = 0.040) after spinal surgery compared with the control group. When compared with other treatment approaches, NPWT also demonstrated a substantial reduction in surgical wound infections and postoperative complications, as well as a shorter duration of hospitalisation after spinal surgery.

Outcomes of Two Different Negative Pressure Therapy Systems for Closed Incision Management in Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been adopted into practices of diverse surgical specialties to help reduce postsurgical complication risks. There are two primary commercially available systems that deliver ciNPT through different mechanisms. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the potential effects of two different ciNPT systems on clinical outcomes following hip and knee arthroplasty. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify hip and knee arthroplasty studies comparing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) and surgical site complications (SSCs) versus standard of care (SOC) following the use of two different ciNPT systems. Four meta-analyses were performed by calculating risk ratios (RR) to assess the effect of (1) ciNPT with foam dressing (ciNPT-F) versus SOC and (2) ciNPT with multilayer absorbent dressing (ciNPT-MLA) versus SOC. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.0 (Biostat Inc., Englewood, NJ) software was used to perform the analyses. Twelve studies comparing ciNPT-F to SOC and six studies comparing ciNPT-MLAto SOC were analyzed. SSI rates were reported in seven of 12 studies involving ciNPT-F. In those, ciNPT-F significantly reduced the incidence of SSI (RR = .401, 95% confidence interval (CI) = .190, .844; p = .016). Across four of six studies that reported SSI rates, there was no significant difference in SSI rates between ciNPT-MLAvs SOC (RR = .580, 95% CI = .222, 1.513; p = .265). SSC rates were evaluated in eight of 12 ciNPT-F studies that reported SSC rates. This meta-analysis of the eight ciNPT-F studies showed significantly reduced SSC rates with ciNPT-F vs SOC (RR = .332, 95% CI = .236, .467; p < 0.001). For ciNPT-MLA, five of six studies reported SSC rates. In those, there was no significant difference in SSC rates between ciNPT-MLA vs SOC (RR = .798, 95% CI = .458, 1.398; p = .425). These meta-analyses results showed a significant reduction in SSI and SSC rates in the ciNPT-F group vs SOC and no difference in SSI and SSC rates in the ciNPT-MLA group vs SOC. The reasons for these observed differences were not evaluated as part of this study. Future controlled clinical studies comparing outcomes between different ciNPT systems over closed orthopedic incisions would help to validate these study results.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy versus Standard of Care in Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been utilized to help manage closed incisions across many surgical specialties. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of ciNPT on postsurgical and health economic outcomes.

Methods

A systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and QUOSA was performed for publications written in English, comparing ciNPT to standard-of-care dressings between January 2005 and August 2021. Study participant characteristics, surgical procedure, dressings used, treatment duration, postsurgical outcomes, and follow-up data were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Risk ratios summarized dichotomous outcomes. Difference in means or standardized difference in means was used to assess continuous variables reported on the same scale or outcomes reported on different scales/measurement instruments.

Results

The literature search identified 84 studies for analysis. Significant reductions in surgical site complication (SSC), surgical site infection (SSI), superficial SSI, deep SSI, seroma, dehiscence, skin necrosis, and prolonged incisional drainage were associated with ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Reduced readmissions and reoperations were significant in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05). Patients receiving ciNPT had a 0.9-day shorter hospital stay (P < 0.0001). Differences in postoperative pain scores and reported amounts of opioid usage were significant in favor of ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Scar evaluations demonstrated improved scarring in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05).

Discussion

For these meta-analyses, ciNPT use was associated with statistically significant reduction in SSCs, SSIs, seroma, dehiscence, and skin necrosis incidence. Reduced readmissions, reoperation, length of hospital stay, decreased pain scores and opioid use, and improved scarring were also observed in ciNPT patients.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Promotes Wound Healing by Inhibiting Inflammation in Diabetic Foot Wounds: A Role for NOD1 Receptor

Aims: Diabetic foot results in frequent amputation and quality-of-life reduction in diabetes population. These lesions are featured by a prolonged and exaggerated inflammation with a significant impairment in local bacterial invasion. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) attenuates hyperinflammation in the healing of diabetic foot wounds, but the potential mechanism of NPWT down-regulated inflammatory reaction still remains elusive. This study aims to explore the inflammatory signaling involved in the effect of NPWT on diabetic ulcer. Methods: Thirty patients with diabetic foot ulceration were divided into NPWT group (treated with NPWT, n = 10), NPWT + FK565 group (treated with NPWT combined with FK565 which is NOD1 receptor ligand, n = 10) and control group (n = 10). After two weeks treatment, samples were harvested and analyzed by histochemistry for infiltration of inflammatory cells, immunofluorescence stain for NOD1, western blotting for NOD1, RIP2 (Receptor interacting protein 2), IL-1β, TAK1 (Transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase1), p65 and real time-PCR for expression of NOD1 and RIP2. Results: NPWT could notably accelerate the diabetic wound healing through alleviating inflammatory reaction. The immunofluorescence analysis results revealed that NOD1 was mainly expressed in the cytoplasm and noticeably decreased after the NPWT treatment. And NPWT obviously decreased both the mRNA and protein level of NOD1 and RIP2. Moreover, The protein expression of IL-1β, TAK1 and p65 in the NPWT-group were significant decreased. Conclusion: NPWT effectively promotes wound healing by suppressing the wound inflammation in diabetic foot, which is mediated at least in part by suppression of NOD1 receptor.

A systemic review and a meta-analysis on the influences of closed incisions in orthopaedic trauma surgery by negative pressure wound treatment compared with conventional dressings

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the influences of closed incisions in orthopaedic trauma surgery (OTS) by negative pressure wound treatment (NPWT) compared with conventional dressings. A systematic literature search up to March 2022 was done and 14 studies included 3935 subjects with OTS at the start of the study; 2023 of them used NPWT and 1912 were conventional dressings. They were reporting relationships between the influences of closed incisions in OTS by NPWT compared with conventional dressings. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the influences of closed incisions in OTS by NPWT compared with conventional dressings using the dichotomous methods with a random or fixed-effect model. NPWT had significantly lower deep surgical site infections (SSIs) (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87, P = .004), superficial SSIs (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19-0.61, P < .001), and wound dehiscence (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21-0.80, P = .009) compared with conventional dressings in subjects with closed incisions in OTS. NPWT showed a beneficial effect on deep SSIs, superficial SSIs, and wound dehiscence compared with conventional dressings in subjects with closed incisions in OTS. Further studies are required to validate these findings.