Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of propafenone and cimetidine

Clinical Pearls in Using Antiarrhythmic Drugs in the Outpatient Setting

A role for oral antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) remains in clinical practice for patients with atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in spite of advances in nonpharmacologic therapy. Pharmacists play a vital role in the appropriate use of AAD dosing, administration, adverse effects, interactions, and monitoring. Pharmacists who are involved in providing care to patients with cardiac arrhythmias must remain updated regarding the efficacy and safety of the most commonly used AADs. This review will address key issues for appropriate initiation and maintenance of commonly selected Vaughan-Williams Class Ic and III agents in the outpatient setting.

Cardiovascular drug-drug interactions

The drug-drug interactions discussed in this article have either documented or suspected clinical relevance for patients with cardiovascular disease and the clinician involved in the care of these patients. Oftentimes, drug-drug interactions are difficult, if not impossible, to predict because of the high degree of interpatient variability in drug disposition. Certain drug-drug interactions, however, may be avoided through knowledge and sound clinical judgment. Every clinician should maintain a working knowledge of reported drug-drug interactions and an understanding of basic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles to help predict and minimize the incidence and severity of drug-drug interactions.

Effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of dofetilide

AIMS

The aim of this open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized, four-period crossover study was to determine the effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of dofetilide.

METHODS

Twenty healthy male subjects received 100 or 400 mg twice daily of cimetidine, 150 mg twice daily of ranitidine, or placebo for 4 days. On the second day, a single oral 500 microg dose of dofetilide was administered immediately after the morning doses of cimetidine, ranitidine, or placebo. Treatment periods were separated by 1-2 weeks. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma and urinary dofetilide concentrations; prolongation of the QTc interval was determined from three-lead electrocardiograms.

RESULTS

Ranitidine did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of dofetilide; however, a dose-dependent increase in exposure to dofetilide was observed with cimetidine. When dofetilide was administered with 100 and 400 mg of cimetidine, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of dofetilide increased by 11% and 48% and the maximum plasma dofetilide concentration increased by 11% and 29%, respectively. The respective cimetidine doses reduced renal clearance of dofetilide by 13% and 33% and nonrenal clearance by 5% and 21%. Dofetilide-induced prolongation of the QTc interval was enhanced by cimetidine; the mean maximum change in QTc interval from baseline was increased by 22% and 33% with 100 and 400 mg of cimetidine, respectively. However, the relationship between the prolongation of the QTc interval and plasma dofetilide concentrations was unaffected by cimetidine or ranitidine; a 1 ng ml-1 increase in plasma dofetilide concentration produced a 17-19 ms prolongation of the QTc interval. Dofetilide was well tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events or laboratory abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that cimetidine increased dofetilide exposure by inhibiting renal tubular dofetilide secretion, whereas ranitidine did not. This effect is not an H2-receptor antagonist class effect but is specific to cimetidine. If therapy with an H2-receptor antagonist is required, it is recommended that cimetidine at all doses be avoided; since ranitidine has no effect on dofetilide pharmacokinetics or prolongation of the QTc interval, it can be seen as a suitable alternative.

The effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of cifenline

Twelve healthy subjects completed an open single dose study to evaluate the effect of co-administration of cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of cifenline. Each subject received a single 160 mg dose of cifenline alone, in combination with cimetidine (300 mg four times daily), and with ranitidine (150 mg twice daily). The H2-receptor antagonists were given with breakfast 1 h prior to cifenline dosing and continuing for 48 h. Co-administration of cimetidine significantly increased Cmax (27%) and AUC (44%) and prolonged the half-life (30%) of cifenline. There were no differences in these parameters when ranitidine was co-administered with cifenline. The results of this study suggest that cimetidine, but not ranitidine, lowers the clearance of cifenline by inhibition of hepatic oxidative metabolism.

Propafenone: a novel type Ic antiarrhythmic agent

Propafenone is an investigational type Ic anti-arrhythmic agent that markedly slows conduction velocity in all cardiac tissues. Propafenone also possesses weak beta- and calcium-channel blocking properties. The bioavailability of propafenone is dose-dependent. Hepatic metabolism of this agent is polymorphic and appears to correlate with the ability of the liver to oxidize debrisoquin sulfate. Propafenone is effective in suppressing spontaneous ventricular ectopy; however, the drug may be less effective in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation when evaluated using programmed stimulation. Propafenone is also useful in the treatment of supraventricular tachycardias including atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia, AV reentrant tachycardia associated with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and atrial fibrillation. Adverse reactions seen with propafenone affect the gastrointestinal, central nervous, and cardiovascular systems. Comparative studies with currently available type Ic agents are needed to better define propafenone's place in therapy.