Poly(methacrylic acid-co-methyl methacrylate) beads promote vascularization and wound repair in diabetic mice

Mobilizing Endogenous Repair Through Understanding Immune Reaction With Biomaterials

With few exceptions, humans are incapable of fully recovering from severe physical trauma. Due to these limitations, the field of regenerative medicine seeks to find clinically viable ways to repair permanently damaged tissue. There are two main approaches to regenerative medicine: promoting endogenous repair of the wound, or transplanting a material to replace the injured tissue. In recent years, these two methods have fused with the development of biomaterials that act as a scaffold and mobilize the body's natural healing capabilities. This process involves not only promoting stem cell behavior, but by also inducing activity of the immune system. Through understanding the immune interactions with biomaterials, we can understand how the immune system participates in regeneration and wound healing. In this review, we will focus on biomaterials that promote endogenous tissue repair, with discussion on their interactions with the immune system.

Diabetic wound regeneration using peptide-modified hydrogels to target re-epithelialization

There is a clinical need for new, more effective treatments for chronic wounds in diabetic patients. Lack of epithelial cell migration is a hallmark of nonhealing wounds, and diabetes often involves endothelial dysfunction. Therefore, targeting re-epithelialization, which mainly involves keratinocytes, may improve therapeutic outcomes of current treatments. In this study, we present an integrin-binding prosurvival peptide derived from angiopoietin-1, QHREDGS (glutamine-histidine-arginine-glutamic acid-aspartic acid-glycine-serine), as a therapeutic candidate for diabetic wound treatments by demonstrating its efficacy in promoting the attachment, survival, and collective migration of human primary keratinocytes and the activation of protein kinase B Akt and MAPK_p42/44 The QHREDGS peptide, both as a soluble supplement and when immobilized in a substrate, protected keratinocytes against hydrogen peroxide stress in a dose-dependent manner. Collective migration of both normal and diabetic human keratinocytes was promoted on chitosan-collagen films with the immobilized QHREDGS peptide. The clinical relevance was demonstrated further by assessing the chitosan-collagen hydrogel with immobilized QHREDGS in full-thickness excisional wounds in a db/db diabetic mouse model; QHREDGS showed significantly accelerated and enhanced wound closure compared with a clinically approved collagen wound dressing, peptide-free hydrogel, or blank wound controls. The accelerated wound closure resulted primarily from faster re-epithelialization and increased formation of granulation tissue. There were no observable differences in blood vessel density or size within the wound; however, the total number of blood vessels was greater in the peptide-hydrogel-treated wounds. Together, these findings indicate that QHREDGS is a promising candidate for wound-healing interventions that enhance re-epithelialization and the formation of granulation tissue.

Unbiased phosphoproteomic method identifies the initial effects of a methacrylic acid copolymer on macrophages

An unbiased phosphoproteomic method was used to identify biomaterial-associated changes in the phosphorylation patterns of macrophage-like cells. The phosphorylation differences between differentiated THP1 (dTHP1) cells treated for 10, 20, or 30 min with a vascular regenerative methacrylic acid (MAA) copolymer or a control methyl methacrylate (MM) copolymer were determined by MS. There were 1,470 peptides (corresponding to 729 proteins) that were differentially phosphorylated in dTHP1 cells treated with the two materials with a greater cellular response to MAA treatment. In addition to identifying pathways (such as integrin signaling and cytoskeletal arrangement) that are well known to change with cell-material interaction, previously unidentified pathways, such as apoptosis and mRNA splicing, were also discovered.

Tissue engineering and regenerative repair in wound healing

Wound healing is a highly evolved defense mechanism against infection and further injury. It is a complex process involving multiple cell types and biological pathways. Mammalian adult cutaneous wound healing is mediated by a fibroproliferative response leading to scar formation. In contrast, early to mid-gestational fetal cutaneous wound healing is more akin to regeneration and occurs without scar formation. This early observation has led to extensive research seeking to unlock the mechanism underlying fetal scarless regenerative repair. Building upon recent advances in biomaterials and stem cell applications, tissue engineering approaches are working towards a recapitulation of this phenomenon. In this review, we describe the elements that distinguish fetal scarless and adult scarring wound healing, and discuss current trends in tissue engineering aimed at achieving scarless tissue regeneration.

Increasing vascularity to improve healing of a segmental defect of the rat femur

BACKGROUND

Segmental bone loss remains a challenging clinical problem. A frequent mitigating factor is inadequate blood supply. Small molecules that activate the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway can be used to stimulate angiogenesis. We investigated an approach to promote healing using angiogenic and osteogenic compounds in combination with a biodegradable, weightbearing scaffold.

METHODS

Adult rats underwent removal of a 5-mm segment of femur stabilized by a cylindrical biodegradable implant and intramedullary fixation. Treatment groups included 1) saline (negative control); 2) desferrioxamine (DFO, a hypoxia-inducible factor activator; 3) low-dose recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) (5 μg); 4) DFO and low-dose rhBMP-2 (5 μg); or 5) rh-BMP-2 (10 μg). Angiography was used to evaluate vascularity. Bone healing was assessed by radiographs, microcomputed tomography, histology, and biomechanical testing.

RESULTS

Increased vascularity was seen at 6 weeks in the DFO treatment group. There appeared to be increased bone bridging as assessed by radiographic scores and microcomputed tomography in the BMP groups, although the quantification of bone volume did not show statistically significant differences. Biomechanical testing revealed improved stiffness in the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

DFO improved angiogenesis and stiffness of bone healing in segmental defects. BMP improved radiographic scores and stiffness. Use of angiogenic compounds in segmental bone loss is promising.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway may prove useful for bone defects, particularly where impaired blood supply exists.The low-cost approach could be useful in segmental bone defects clinically.