MR Neurography of Lumbosacral Plexus: Incremental Value Over XR, CT, and MRI of L Spine With Improved Outcomes in Patients With Radiculopathy and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Delayed Ferumoxtran-10-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Lumbosacral Plexus: Impact on Vascular Suppression and Image Quality

BACKGROUND

Intravenous Ferumoxtran-10 belongs to ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide particles and can be used for magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) as an alternative to other imaging methods which use contrast agents.

PURPOSE

To examine the impact of intravenous Ferumoxtran-10 on vascular suppression and compare image quality to gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced image acquisition in MRN of lumbosacral plexus (LS).

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION/SUBJECTS

17 patients with Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MRN, and 20 patients with Gd-enhanced MRN.

FIELDSTRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3T/3D STIR sequence.

ASSESSMENT

Image quality, nerve visibility and vascular suppression were evaluated by 3 readers using a 5-point Likert scale.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Inter-reader agreement (IRA) was calculated using intraclass coefficients (ICC). Quantitative analysis of image quality was performed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements and compared using Student's t-testing.

RESULTS

Image quality, nerve visibility and vascular suppression were significantly higher for Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MRN compared to Gd-enhanced MRN sequences (p < 0.05). IRA for image quality of nerves was good in Gd-enhanced and Ferumoxtran-10 MRN with ICC values of 0.76 and 0.89, respectively. IRA for nerve visibility was good in Gd- and Ferumoxtran-10 enhanced MR neurography (ICC 0.72 and 0.90). Mean SNR was significantly higher in Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MRN for all analyzed structures, while mean CNR was for significantly better for S1 ganglion and femoral nerve in Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MRN (p < 0.05).

DATA CONCLUSION

Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MRN of the LS plexus showed significantly higher image quality and nerve visibility with better vascular suppression as compared to Gd-enhanced MRN.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Improved 3D DESS MR neurography of the lumbosacral plexus with deep learning and geometric image combination reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of deep learning (DL) reconstruction in enhancing image quality and nerve conspicuity in LSP MRN using DESS sequences. Additionally, a geometric image combination (GIC) method to improve DESS signals' combination was proposed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients undergoing 3.0 Tesla LSP MRN with DESS were prospectively enrolled. The 3D DESS echoes were separately reconstructed with and without DL and DL-GIC combined reconstructions. In a subset of patients, 3D T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery (STIR-T2w) sequences were also acquired. Three radiologists rated 4 image stacks ('DESS S2', 'DESS S2 DL', 'DESS GIC DL' and 'STIR-T2w DL') for bulk motion, vascular suppression, nerve fascicular architecture, and overall nerve conspicuity. Relative SNR, nerve-to-muscle, -fat, and -vessel contrast ratios were measured. Statistical analysis included ANOVA and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Forty patients (22 females; mean age = 48.6 ± 18.5 years) were enrolled. Quantitatively, 'DESS GIC DL' demonstrated superior relative SNR (p < 0.001), while 'DESS S2 DL' exhibited superior nerve-to-background contrast ratio (p value range: 0.002 to < 0.001). Qualitatively, DESS provided superior vascular suppression and depiction of sciatic nerve fascicular architecture but more bulk motion as compared to 'STIR-T2w DL'. 'DESS GIC DL' demonstrated better nerve visualization for several smaller, distal nerve segments than 'DESS S2 DL' and 'STIR-T2w DL'.

CONCLUSION

Application of a DL reconstruction with geometric image combination in DESS MRN improves nerve conspicuity of the LSP, especially for its smaller branch nerves.

Neurologic Approach to Radiculopathy, Back Pain, and Neck Pain

Back pain and neck pain are common in clinical practice, but significant challenges and pitfalls exist in their diagnosis, treatment, and management. From the neurologic standpoint, cervical radiculopathy and lumbosacral radiculopathy are characterized by neck pain or back pain accompanied by sensory and motor symptoms in an arm or leg. The basic neurologic examination is vital, but testing like electromyography and MRI is often needed especially in cases that fail conservative management. Oral medications, injection-based therapies, physical therapy, and surgical evaluation all have a place in the comprehensive neurologic management of back and neck pain and associated radiculopathy.

Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Lumbosacral Plexus

Pain and weakness in the low back, pelvis, and lower extremities are diagnostically challenging, and imaging can be an important step in the workup and management of these patients. Technical advances in magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) have significantly improved its utility for imaging the lumbosacral plexus (LSP). In this article, the authors review LSP anatomy and selected pathology examples. In addition, the authors will discuss technical considerations for MRN with specific points for the branch nerves off the plexus.

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: No Longer a Surgeon's Defeat-A Narrative Review

The introduction of the term Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS-T1/2), replacing the older term Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS), has significantly influenced our approach to diagnosing and treating post-surgical spinal pain. This comprehensive review discusses this change and its effects on patient care. Various diagnostic methods are employed to elucidate the underlying causes of back pain, and this information is critical in guiding treatment decisions. The management of PSPS-T1/2 involves both causative treatments, which directly address the root cause of pain, and symptomatic treatments, which focus on managing the symptoms of pain and improving overall function. The importance of a multidisciplinary and holistic approach is emphasized in the treatment of PSPS-T1/2. This approach is patient-centered and treatment plans are customized to individual patient needs and circumstances. The review concludes with a reflection on the impact of the new PSPS nomenclature on the perception and management of post-surgical spinal pain.