Association between PR Interval, First-degree atrioventricular block and major arrhythmic events in patients with Brugada syndrome - Systematic review and meta-analysis

Brugada syndrome in Iran: Insights from a 12-year longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is characterized by ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads, which is not explained by ischemia, electrolyte disturbances, or obvious structural heart disease.

AIM

In present study, we aim to evaluate presentation, long-term outcome, genetic findings, and therapeutic interventions in patients with BrS.

METHODS

Between September 2001 and June 2022, all consecutive patients with diagnosis of BrS were enrolled in the present study. All patients gave written informed consent for the procedure, and the local ethical committee approved the study.

RESULTS

Of the 76 cases, 79% were proband and 21% were detected during screening after diagnosis of BrS in a family member. Thirty-three (43%) patients had a typical spontaneous electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern. Thirty percent of the patients were symptomatic; symptomatic patients were more likely to have spontaneous type 1 Brugada ECG pattern in their ECGs (p = .01), longer PR interval (p = .03), and SCN5A mutation (p = .01) than asymptomatic patients. The mean PR interval was considerably longer in men than women (p = .034). SCN5A mutation was found in 9 out of 50 (18%) studied patients. Fifteen percent received appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy and inappropriate ICD interventions were observed in 17%. Presentation with aborted SCD or arrhythmic syncope was the only predictor of adverse outcome in follow-up (odds ratio: 3.1, 95% confidence interval: 0.7-19.6, p = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic patients with BrS are more likely to present with spontaneous type 1 Brugada ECG pattern, longer PR interval, and pathogenic mutation in SCN5A gene. Appropriate ICD interventions are more likely in symptomatic patients and those with SCN5A mutation.

Twelve-Lead ECG, Holter Monitoring Parameters, and Genetic Testing in Brugada Syndrome: Insights from Analysis of Multigenerational Family with a History of Sudden Cardiac Arrest during Physical Activity

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an arrhythmogenic disorder increasing the risk of syncopal episodes and sudden cardiac death. BrS usually runs through families with reduced penetrance and variable expression. We analyzed the multigenerational family of a patient who died after sudden cardiac arrest with post-mortem diagnosis of BrS. We analyzed clinical history, comprehensive arrhythmic risk, genetic findings, and additional tests, including electrocardiogram (ECG), detailed 24-hour Holter ECG results, and standard echocardiography findings, and followed up the patients in the ambulatory clinic. We analyzed a pedigree of 33 members of four generations of the family (19 male and 14 female patients). In this family, we identified 7 patients with BrS (median Modified Shanghai Score and Sieira model: 4.5 (4-6) and 1 (0-4) points, respectively), including both parents of the deceased patient, and 8 relatives with negative sodium channel blocker drug challenge test. Genetic testing revealed a novel mutation in sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5 (SCN5A) c.941A>G, (p.Tyr314Cys) inherited from the father of the proband. Patients with BrS were characterized by longer P-wave duration (120 (102-155) vs. 92.5 (88-110) ms, p = 0.013) and longer PR intervals (211.3 ±26.3 vs. 161.6 ± 18.9 ms, p = 0.001), along with more frequent positive aVR sign, but did not differ in terms of QRS duration or T-wave characteristics in resting ECGs. BrS patients were characterized by lower mean, minimal, and maximal (for all p ≤ 0.01) heart rates obtained from Holter ECG monitoring, while there was no difference in arrhythmias among investigated patients. Moreover, visual diurnal variability of ST segment changes and fragmented QRS complexes were observed in patients with BrS in Holter ECG monitoring. There were no major arrhythmic events during median follow-up of 68.7 months of alive BrS patients. These results suggest ECG features which may be associated with a diagnosis of BrS and indicate a novel SCN5A variant in BrS patients. Twelve-lead Holter ECG monitoring, with modified precordial leads placement, may be useful in BrS diagnostics and risk stratification in personalized medicine.

Predictors of late arrhythmic events after generator replacement in Brugada syndrome treated with prophylactic ICD

Introduction

Predictors of late life-threatening arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients who received a prophylactic ICD implantation remain to be evaluated. The aim of the present long-term multicenter study was to assess the incidence and clinical-electrocardiographic predictors of late life-threatening arrhythmic events in BrS patients with a prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and undergoing generator replacement (GR).

Methods

The study population included 105 patients (75% males; mean age 45 ± 14years) who received a prophylactic ICD and had no arrhythmic event up to first GR.

Results

The median period from first ICD implantation to last follow-up was 155 (128-181) months and from first ICD Implantation to the GR was 84 (61-102) months. During a median follow-up of 57 (38-102) months after GR, 10 patients (9%) received successful appropriate ICD intervention (1.6%/year). ICD interventions included shock on ventricular fibrillation (n = 8 patients), shock on ventricular tachycardia (n = 1 patient), and antitachycardia pacing on ventricular tachycardia (n = 1 patient). At survival analysis, history of atrial fibrillation (log-rank test; P = 0.02), conduction disturbances (log-rank test; P < 0.01), S wave in lead I (log-rank test; P = 0.01) and first-degree atrioventricular block (log-rank test; P = 0.04) were significantly associated with the occurrence of late appropriate ICD intervention. At Cox-regression multivariate analysis, S-wave in lead I was the only independent predictor of late appropriate ICD intervention (HR: 9.17; 95%CI: 1.15-73.07; P = 0.03).

Conclusions

The present study indicates that BrS patient receiving a prophylactic ICD may experience late appropriate intervention after GR in a clinically relevant proportion of cases. S-wave in lead I at the time of first clinical evaluation was the only independent predictor of persistent risk of life-threatening arrhythmic events. These findings support the need for GR at the end of service regardless of previous appropriate intervention, mostly in BrS patients with conduction abnormalities.

Electrocardiographic Markers Indicating Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Conduction Delay as a Predictor of Major Arrhythmic Events in Patients With Brugada Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Risk stratification in Brugada Syndrome (BrS) patients is still challenging due to the heterogeneity of clinical presentation; thus, some additional risk markers are needed. Several studies investigating the association between RVOT conduction delay sign on electrocardiography (ECG) and major arrhythmic events (MAE) in BrS patients showed inconclusive results. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the association between RVOT conduction delay signs presented by aVR sign and large S wave in lead I, and MAE in BrS patients.

Methods

The literature search was performed using several online databases from the inception to March 16th, 2022. We included studies consisting of two main components, including ECG markers of RVOT conduction delay (aVR sign and large S wave in lead I) and MAE related to BrS (syncope/VT/VF/SCD/aborted SCD/appropriate ICD shocks)

Results

Meta-analysis of eleven cohort studies with a total of 2,575 participants showed RVOT conduction delay sign was significantly associated with MAE in BrS patients [RR = 1.87 (1.35, 2.58); p &lt; 0.001; I2= 52%, Pheterogeneity = 0.02]. Subgroup analysis showed that aVR sign [RR = 2.00 (1.42, 2.83); p &lt; 0.001; I2= 0%, Pheterogeneity = 0.40] and large S wave in lead I [RR = 1.74 (1.11, 2.71); p = 0.01; I2= 60%, Pheterogeneity = 0.01] were significantly associated with MAE. Summary receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed the aVR sign [AUC: 0.77 (0.73–0.80)] and large S wave in lead I [AUC: 0.69 (0.65–0.73)] were a good predictor of MAE in BrS patients.

Conclusion

RVOT conduction delay sign, presented by aVR sign and large S wave in the lead I, is significantly associated with an increased risk of MAE in BrS patients. Hence, we propose that these parameters may be useful as an additional risk stratification tool to predict MAE in BrS patients.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier: CRD42022321090.

Pathogenesis and Management of Brugada Syndrome: Recent Advances and Protocol for Umbrella Reviews of Meta-Analyses in Major Arrhythmic Events Risk Stratification

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a primary electrical disease associated with life-threatening arrhythmias. It is estimated to cause at least 20% of sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) in patients with normal cardiac anatomy. In this review paper, we discuss recent advances in complex BrS pathogenesis, diagnostics, and current standard approaches to major arrhythmic events (MAEs) risk stratification. Additionally, we describe a protocol for umbrella reviews to systematically investigate clinical, electrocardiographic, electrophysiological study, programmed ventricular stimulation, and genetic factors associated with BrS, and the risk of MAEs. Our evaluation will include MAEs such as sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, appropriate implantable cardioverter–defibrillator therapy, sudden cardiac arrest, and SCDs from previous meta-analytical studies. The protocol was written following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. We plan to extensively search PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for meta-analyses concerning risk-stratification in BrS. Data will be synthesized integratively with transparency and accuracy. Heterogeneity patterns across studies will be reported. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2), and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) are planned to be applied for design and execution of our evidence-based research. To the best of our knowledge, these will be the first umbrella reviews to critically evaluate the current state of knowledge in BrS risk stratification for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, and will potentially contribute towards evidence-based guidance to enhance clinical decisions.