Periodontitis prevalence and severity in an African population: A cross-sectional study in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana

Advances and challenges in the development of periodontitis vaccines: A comprehensive review

Periodontitis is a prevalent polymicrobial disease. It damages soft tissues and alveolar bone, and causes a significant public-health burden. Development of an advanced therapeutic approach and exploration of vaccines against periodontitis hold promise as potential treatment avenues. Clinical trials for a periodontitis vaccine are lacking. Therefore, it is crucial to address the urgent need for developing strategies to implement vaccines at the primary level of prevention in public health. A deep understanding of the principles and mechanisms of action of vaccines plays a crucial role in the successful development of vaccines and their clinical translation. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of potential directions for the development of highly efficacious periodontitis vaccines. In addition, we address the limitations of these endeavors and explore future possibilities for the development of an efficacious vaccine against periodontitis.

Occurrence of periodontal diseases according to the ACES 2018 Classification Framework and the CDC/AAP definition: A cross-sectional study in a major Brazilian city

AIM

The occurrence of periodontal diseases is still to be determined in large samples of major Brazilian cities. This study aimed to assess the periodontal status of adults from Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, using periodontitis definitions by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP) and the recently published ACES 2018 Classification Framework.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-stage probability sampling technique was applied to draw individuals aged 18 or older. A total of 566 individuals underwent a full-mouth periodontal examination. Periodontitis cases were defined according to the CDC/AAP and the ACES 2018 Classification Framework. Non-periodontitis cases were classified as healthy or gingivitis. The agreement between the two definitions was calculated.

RESULTS

Periodontal health was present in 33.6% and 13.8% of individuals, and gingivitis was found in 11.7% and 7.5%, according to CDC/AAP and ACES, respectively. Mild, moderate and severe periodontitis (CDC/AAP) were present in 2.1%, 33.4% and 19.1% of individuals, respectively. Using ACES, 34.3% had Stages I/II and 43.3% had Stages III/IV. The occurrence of periodontitis was higher when a subgroup of individuals aged 30+ were analysed, ranging from 69.6% (CDC/AAP) to 90.1% (ACES). CDC/AAP and ACES agreement for health, gingivitis and periodontitis accounted for 68.8% of the observations.

CONCLUSIONS

Periodontal diseases affect more than 66% of the population aged 18+ years. Classic definition by the CDC/AAP and the recently published ACES Framework yielded moderate agreement.

The regulatory effect of zinc on the association between periodontitis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

BACKGROUND

Zinc has been proven to be effective against periodontitis, and also reported to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). This study aims to explore the regulatory effect of zinc intake on the association between periodontitis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Logistic regression model was used to explore the association between zinc-RDA or periodontitis and 10-year ASCVD risk ≥ 20%, and results were shown as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The regulatory effect of zinc intake on the association between periodontitis and 10-year ASCVD risk ≥ 20% was also assessed using logistic regression model. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age, gender, obesity, education level, lipid-lowering therapy, and dental floss.

RESULTS

6,075 patients were finally included for analysis. Zinc intake reaching the recommended level (OR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.69-0.98) and periodontitis (OR = 2.47, 95%CI: 2.04-3.00) were found to be associated with 0.82-fold and 2.47-fold odds of 10-year ASCVD risk ≥ 20%, respectively. In addition, we found that the odds of 10-year ASCVD risk ≥ 20% was lower in patients with zinc intake reaching the recommended level than those without [OR (95%CI): 2.25 (1.81-2.80) vs. 2.72 (2.05-3.62)]. The similar regulatory effect was found in patients with age ≥ 60 years and < 60 years, in male and female, with or without obesity, in different education levels, with or without lipid lowering therapy, and with or without use of dental floss (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found the regulatory effect of adequate zinc intake on the association between periodontitis and ASCVD, providing guidance for periodontitis patients to decrease the risk of ASCVD.

Effect of blood lead levels on periodontitis in American adults: a cross-sectional analysis from the national health and nutrition examination survey

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of blood lead levels on the development and progression of periodontitis.

METHODS

This study included 8600 participants from the National Nutrition and Health Examination Survey conducted the United States between 2009 and 2014. The exposure variable was the blood lead level, while the outcome variable was periodontitis. To evaluate the relationship between the blood lead level and periodontitis, a multivariate logistic regression model was used.

RESULTS

A positive association was observed between blood lead levels and the risk of periodontitis in Model 1 (OR = 7.04, 95% CI = 5.95-8.31). After adjusting for age (continuous), sex, ethnicity, and BMI (continuous) in Model 2, the significant association between blood lead levels and periodontitis risk remained evident (OR = 3.06, 95% CI: 2.54-3.70). Consequently, even after comprehensive adjustment for potential confounding factors in Model 3, the robust association between blood lead levels and periodontitis risk persisted (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.67-2.60). When considering the serum lead concentration as a categorical variable and after adjusting for potential confounders in Model 3, we observed that the odds ratios (ORs) of periodontitis in the T2 (0.94 µg/dL-1.60 µg/dL) and T3 (lead ≥ 1.60 µg/dL) groups increased from 1.27 (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11-1.44) to 1.57 (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.36-1.81) compared to T1 group. Subgroup analysis revealed no effect modifiers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our main findings suggest that there is no safe range of blood lead levels regarding periodontitis risk and that increasing blood lead levels can significantly increase the prevalence of periodontitis.

The association of work physical activity and recreational physical activity with periodontitis in the NHANES (2009-2014)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between different types and intensity of physical activities (PA) and periodontitis in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States.

METHODS

The data of periodontal condition and PA of 10,714 individuals were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2009 to 2014 and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). The association between the prevalence of periodontitis and two PAs (work PA and recreational PA) was respectively analyzed and adjusted by uni- and multi-variable logistic regression models. The odd ratios (ORs), adjusted odd ratios (ORad ), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated as the main outcome indicators.

RESULTS

After adjusted by age, sex, race, poverty-income ratio (PIR), diabetes, smoking status, alcohol use, and floss frequency, moderate and vigorous work PAs were significantly correlated with higher odds of periodontitis (ORad  = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.02-1.46; ORad  = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.04-1.89, respectively) while moderate and vigorous recreational PAs were correlated with lower odds of periodontitis (ORad  = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.69-0.95; ORad  = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.43-0.71, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Work PAs and recreational PAs have opposite associations on the prevalence of developing periodontitis and their aggravating or protective associations enhance with the increase of intensity.

Abnormal Micronutrient Intake Is Associated with the Risk of Periodontitis: A Dose-response Association Study Based on NHANES 2009-2014

The association between micronutrient intake and the risk of periodontitis has received much attention in recent years. However, most studies focused on the linear relationship between them. This study aimed to explore the dose-response association between micronutrient intake and periodontitis. A total of 8959 participants who underwent a periodontal examination, and reported their micronutrient intake levels were derived from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2009-2014) database. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations between micronutrient intake and periodontitis after propensity score matching (PSM), and restricted cubic splines (RCS) analysis was conducted to explore the dose-response associations. Following PSM, 5530 participants were included in the RCS analysis. The risk of periodontitis was reduced with sufficient intake of the following micronutrients: vitamin A, vitamin B1, vitamin B2, and vitamin E. In addition, the risk of periodontitis was increased with excessive intake of the following micronutrients: vitamin B1 (1.8 mg/day, males; 1.3 mg/day, females), vitamin C (90 mg/day, males), and copper (1.1 mg/day, combined). In conclusion, a linear association was found between vitamin A, vitamin B2, vitamin C, and copper and periodontitis-namely, a sufficient intake of vitamin A and vitamin B2 might help reduce the prevalence of periodontitis; by contrast, a high intake of vitamin C and copper increased the risk. In addition, a nonlinear dose-response association was found for the incidence of periodontitis with vitamin B1 and vitamin E. When within reasonable limits, supplemental intake helped reduce the prevalence of periodontitis, while excessive intake did not help significantly and might even increase the risk. However, confounding factors, such as health awareness, should still be considered.