High-risk stage II colon cancer after curative resection

Is High-Grade Tumor Budding an Independent Prognostic Factor in Stage II Colon Cancer?

BACKGROUND

Risk factors, including lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion, are considered indications for adjuvant treatment in stage II colon cancer. However, tumor budding is not included in the above risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the value of tumor budding as a prognostic factor in stage II colon cancer.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

This study examined 1390 patients with stage II colon cancer who received curative resection from 2007 to 2013 at an institution.

INTERVENTIONS

These patients were classified according to tumor budding status: low-grade tumor budding (less than 10 buds) and high-grade tumor budding (10 buds or more). Differences between the 2 groups were corrected by propensity score matching.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Disease-free survival and overall survival were the primary end points.

RESULTS

Among 1390 patients, 146 (10.5%) had high-grade tumor budding. The high-grade tumor budding group showed adverse histological characteristics such as advanced T stage, histological grade of differentiation, and presence of lymphatic/perineural invasion. After matching, the 5-year disease-free survival rate for the high-grade tumor budding group was significantly lower than for the low-grade group. We also compared survival outcomes according to tumor budding grade for patients who did not have risk factors and did not receive adjuvant treatment. The 5-year overall survival was similar between the 2 groups. However, the 5-year disease-free survival decreased significantly in the high-grade tumor budding group than in the low-grade tumor budding group.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study with a single-center design.

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade tumor budding is a poor prognostic factor in stage II colon cancer and is considered one of the risk factors for adjuvant treatment. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B962 .

ES LA GEMACIN TUMORAL UN FACTOR PRONSTICO INDEPENDIENTE EN EL CNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO II

ANTECEDENTES:Los factores de riesgo, incluida la invasión linfática/vascular/perineural, se consideran indicaciones para el tratamiento adyuvante en el cáncer de colon en estadio II. Sin embargo, la gemación tumoral (desdiferenciación tumoral aislada), no está incluida en los factores de riesgo anteriores.OBJETIVO:El objeto de este estudio fue evaluar el valor de la gemación tumoral como factor pronóstico en el cáncer de colon en estadio II.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Este estudio se realizó en un centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Este estudio analizó 1390 pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio II que recibieron una resección curativa entre 2007 y 2013 en una institución.INTERVENCIONES:Estos pacientes se clasificaron según el estado de gemación tumoral: gemación tumoral de bajo grado (<10 yemas) y gemación tumoral de alto grado (≥10 yemas). Las diferencias entre los dos grupos se corrigieron mediante el emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:La supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia global fueron los puntos finales primarios.RESULTADOS:Entre 1.390 pacientes, 146 (10,5%) tenían brotes tumorales de alto grado. El grupo de gemación tumoral de alto grado mostró características histológicas adversas como estadio T avanzado, grado histológico de diferenciación y presencia de invasión linfática/perineural. Después del emparejamiento, la tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad a cinco años para el grupo de brotes de tumores de alto grado fue significativamente menor que para el grupo de bajo grado. También comparamos los resultados de supervivencia según el grado de gemación del tumor para pacientes que no tenían factores de riesgo y que no recibieron tratamiento adyuvante. La supervivencia global a cinco años fue similar entre los dos grupos. Sin embargo, la supervivencia libre de enfermedad a cinco años disminuyó significativamente en el grupo de brotes de tumores de alto grado que en el grupo de brotes de tumores de bajo grado.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo con un diseño de centro único.CONCLUSIÓNES:La gemación tumoral de alto grado es un factor de mal pronóstico en el cáncer de colon estadio II y se considera uno de los factores de riesgo para el tratamiento adyuvante. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B962 . (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Impact on inadequate lymph node harvest on survival in T4N0 colorectal cancer: A would-be medical center experience in Taiwan

Insufficient lymph node harvest (< 12) may lead to incorrect classification of stage I and II disease. Many studies have indicated a poor prognosis with inadequate lymph node harvest in stages I to III, but few studies have demonstrated the relationship between low lymph node harvest and T4 disease. This study aimed to identify the influence of insufficient number of lymph nodes harvested on survival in T4N0 colorectal cancer. We enrolled patients with T4N0 colorectal cancer who underwent radical resection between 2010 and 2016. A total of 155 patients were divided into 2 groups; 142 patients had ≥ 12 harvested lymph nodes, and the other 13 had < 12 lymph nodes. All patients were followed up for at least 5 years. The primary outcome was the impact of the number of lymph nodes harvested on disease-free survival and overall survival, which were investigated using Kaplan-Meier survival techniques. There were no significant differences in recurrence rate, emergent or elective surgery, laparoscopic or open surgery, or chemotherapy between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no statistical differences in 5-year disease-free survival (P = .886) and 5-year overall survival (P = .832) between the groups. There were no significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival between patients with adequate (≥ 12) and inadequate (< 12) lymph node harvest in T4N0 colorectal cancers.

Oncological and clinical outcomes after conventional right hemicolectomy

PURPOSE

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been proposed for better local control of colon cancer and to improve cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, CME may be associated with increased morbidity from bleeding during central vascular ligation. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of conventional right hemicolectomy, a traditional anatomical dissection along anatomical planes with radical excision of the central lymph nodes at the level of the origin of colic artery but without exposure of superior mesenteric vein and artery (SMV/SMA).

METHOD

This was a retrospective review of a cohort of all elective right hemicolectomies performed at a specialist tertiary unit during a five-year period (2011-2015).

RESULTS

Five-hundred-nineteen patients (271 female, a median age of 73.0 years (interquartile range (IQR) 65.0-80.0)) were included (Stage I disease: 2.7%, stage II: 53.2%, stage III: 33.3%, stage IV: 10.8%). At the latest follow-up (a median 47 months (IQR 29-67)), local recurrence occurred in 34 patients (6.6%). Three-year overall survival was 74.4% and 3-year CSS was 85.9%. Subgroup analysis for stage I-III showed local recurrence in 6.0%, sole distant recurrence in 7.6% while 19 patients (4.1%) suffered concomitant local and distant recurrence. The anastomotic leak rate was 1.0% and perioperative bleeding occurred in 1.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncological outcomes comparable to those of CME can be achieved by conventional surgery but with low rates of bleeding complications and anastomotic leakage. The proposed advantages of CME should be carefully considered and balanced against patients' co-morbidities and potential complications.

Optimal cutoff value of preoperative CEA and CA19-9 for prognostic significance in patients with stage II/III colon cancer

PURPOSE

This unicentric, retrospective cohort study aimed to identify the optimal cutoff values of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) for the prognosis in patients with stage II/III colon cancer.

METHODS

After excluding 43 patients with CA19-9 levels < 0.2 U/mL, 588 were included. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine the optimal cutoff values of CEA and CA 19-9 for disease relapse.

RESULTS

The median CEA and CA19-9 values were 3.6 (interquartile range: 2.1-7.2 ng/mL) and 14.3 (interquartile range: 8.1-30.0) U/mL, respectively. The optimal cutoff values of CEA and CA19-9 were 5.4 ng/mL and 22.4 U/mL, respectively. A multivariate analysis of relapse-free survival (RFS) showed that cancer stage, CEA, and CA19-9 were significant independent factors. The RFS of patients with stages II and III colon cancer was significantly stratified by CEA (< 5.4/ ≥ 5.4 ng/mL) and CA19-9 (< 22.4/ ≥ 22.4 U/mL). Prognostication based on the reference values (< 5.0 ng/mL for CEA and < 37.0 U/mL for CA19-9) was less significant than that based on the optimal cutoff values. Both elevated CEA and CA19-9 had no value dependency on RFS: RFS curves were similar between extremely elevated CEA (≥ 54.0 ng/ml) and intermediate CEA (5.4-54.0 ng/ml) and between extremely elevated CA19-9 (≥ 224.0 U/ml) and intermediate CA19-9 (22.4-224.0 U/ml).

CONCLUSION

The optimal cutoff values of preoperative CEA and CA19-9 for RFS were 5.4 ng/ml and 22.4 U/mL, respectively, in patients with stages II and III colon cancer. Further relapse risk stratification is possible using these values.

Impact of high-risk features for stage II adenocarcinoma of the appendix

BACKGROUND

Clinico-pathological high-risk features are frequently utilized in adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) decisions in stage II colorectal cancer and their utility in stage II appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) is not established. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of high-risk features in clinical outcomes and whether high risk features are predictive of AC benefit in stage II AA.

METHODS

Patients with pathological stage II AA between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) using ICD-O-3 morphology and topography codes: 8140, 8480 and C18.1. High risk stage II AA was defined as having at least one of the following clinicopathological features: T4 tumor, <12 lymph nodes examined, poorly differentiated histology, positive margins, or lymphovascular invasion. Patients with none of these features were defined as low-risk.

RESULTS

A total of 1040 patients with pathological stage II AA were identified. 51.0% males, 84.5% Caucasian; median age 61 (range, 19-90). 46.4% were determined to have high-risk stage II AA. High-risk status was associated with worse OS compared to low-risk in univariate (HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.18-2.02; p = 0.001) and multivariable analyses (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.03-1.79; p = 0.028). High-risk stage II AA patients had significantly worse 5-year OS compared to low-risk patients (67.1% vs. 74.5%, p = 0.0013). AC was administered in 34.4% (n = 166) of high-risk patients and in 36.5% (n = 203) of low-risk patients. Among high-risk patients, AC was not associated with better OS in univariate (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.59-1.26; p = 0.448) and multivariable analyses (HR 1.35; 95% CI 0.90-2.04; p = 0.151) compared to no AC. Similarly, among low-risk patients, AC was not associated with better OS in univariate (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.60-1.39; p = 0.679) and multivariable analyses (HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.81-2.02; p = 0.299) compared to no AC. For high-risk patients, 5-year OS was 68.3% in patients that received AC vs. 66.5% in patients that did not (p = 0.722). For low-risk patients, 5-year OS was 74.0% in patients that received AC vs. 76.3% in patients that did not (p = 0.813).

CONCLUSION

High-risk stage II AA patients had significantly worse 5-year OS compared to low-risk patients. AC did not improve survival regardless of high-risk features in stage II AA in this retrospective study. A prospective randomized clinical trial would be required to determine the impact of high-risk features on AC in stage II AA.

Postoperative chemotherapy improves survival in patients with resected high-risk Stage II colorectal cancer: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The aim was to assess the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk Stage II colorectal cancer.

METHOD

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed comparing survival in patients with resected Stage II colorectal cancer and high-risk features having postoperative chemotherapy vs no chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 1031 articles screened, 29 were included, reporting on 183 749 participants. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.61, P < 0.0001], disease-specific survival (HR = 0.73, P = 0.05) and disease-free survival (HR = 0.59, P < 0.0001) compared to no chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased 5-year overall survival (OR = 0.53, P = 0.0008) and 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 0.50, P = 0.001). Overall survival and disease-free survival remained significantly prolonged during subgroup analysis of studies published from 2015 onwards (HR = 0.60, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.65, P = 0.0001; respectively), in patients with two or more high-risk features (HR = 0.59, P = 0.0001; HR = 0.70, P = 0.03; respectively) and in colon cancer (HR = 0.61, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.51, P = 0.0001; respectively). Overall survival, disease-specific survival and disease-free survival during subgroup analysis of individual high-risk features were T4 tumour (HR = 0.58, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.50, P = 0.003; HR = 0.75, P = 0.05), < 12 lymph nodes harvested (HR = 0.67, P = 0.0002; HR = 0.80, P = 0.17; HR = 0.72, P = 0.02), poor differentiation (HR = 0.84, P = 0.35; HR = 0.85, P = 0.23; HR = 0.61, P = 0.41), lymphovascular or perineural invasion (HR = 0.55, P = 0.05; HR = 0.59, P = 0.11; HR = 0.76, P = 0.05) and emergency surgery (HR = 0.60, P = 0.02; HR = 0.68, P = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk Stage II colorectal cancer results in a modest survival improvement and should be considered on an individual patient basis. Due to potential heterogeneity and selection bias of the included studies, and lack of separate rectal cancer data, further large randomized trials with predefined inclusion criteria and standardized chemotherapy regimens are required.

Advanced Age Is a Risk Factor for Recurrence After Resection in Stage II Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The number of older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing. Stage II CRC is a heterogeneous group of cancers with different prognoses. We aimed to examine older patients in relation to clinical outcome following curative resection in stage II CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed data for 329 consecutive patients with stage II CRC following curative resection. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between older patients ≥75 years of age and those <75 years. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

In the multivariable analyses, patients ≥75 years were independently associated with shorter RFS (multivariable HR=2.56, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.55-4.31, p<0.001) and OS (multivariable HR=4.36, 95%CI=2.08-9.97, p<0.001) in stage II CRC.

CONCLUSION

Older patients were independently associated with shorter RFS and OS following curative resection in stage II CRC.

Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Stage II colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective study

Background:

Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with Stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) is an area of controversy in oncology. International guidelines recommend the use of ACT in patients with specific high-risk features. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ACT in improving survival in patients with and without high-risk features.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 225 patients with Stage II CRC who underwent primary tumor resection were included in this study. Patients with one or more high-risk features including T4 tumor, poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, bowel obstruction, local perforation, positive resection margins, or suboptimal lymph node sampling (fewer than 12 nodes) were classified as high risk. The survival analysis was performed between patients who only received curative surgery and those received single-agent (5-fluorouracil [5-FU] and leucovorin [LV] or capecitabine) or multiagent ACT (oxaliplatin and 5-FU + LV or oxaliplatin and capecitabine).

Results:

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 88.4%, and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 80.4%. The 5-year OS and DFS rates improved insignificantly with ACT (89.8% vs. 81.2%, P = 0.59 and 81.3% vs. 74.6%, P = 0.41, respectively); however, multiagent ACT results to inferior 5-year OS and DFS compared to single-agent ACT (82.1 vs. 92.8%, P = 0.14 and 70.1% vs. 86%, P = 0.07, respectively). ACT was associated with insignificant improved OS and DFS in both high-risk and low-risk groups, but high-risk patients who received multiagent ACT had a significant inferior OS and DFS in comparison with those received single-agent ACT. T4 tumor and obstruction were independent poor prognostic factors affecting OS and DFS.

Conclusion:

In our population, the improvement of OS and DFS with ACT was not statistically significant in high-risk and low-risk patients with Stage II CRC.

High-risk Stage II Colorectal Cancers Carry an Equivalent Risk of Peritoneal Recurrence to Stage III

BACKGROUND/AIM

Several risk factors for recurrence have been identified in stage II colorectal cancer. However, in contrast to stage III, the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for these patients remain controversial. We hypothesized that the different impacts of chemotherapy may be due to different patterns of recurrence between these stages. The aim of this study was to characterize recurrence in high-risk stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) in comparison with stage III.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 442 patients with curatively resected stage III and high-risk stage II CRCs were evaluated. The recurrence site and frequency were compared between these stages. The risk factors of recurrence by site were identified using multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

During the follow-up (median: 6.4 years), 31% of stage III and 13% of high-risk stage II patients manifested recurrence. Recurrence in the liver, lung, and distant lymph nodes was significantly more frequent in stage III (18%, 12%, 11%) than in high-risk stage II (7%, 6%, 3%). Stage III was independently associated with recurrence in these organs. In contrast, the rate of peritoneal recurrence was 5% in both stages.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware that high-risk stage II CRC has a similar risk of postoperative recurrence in the peritoneum to Stage III CRC.

High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer: Not All Risks Are Created Equal

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in patients with stage II colon cancer with high-risk features (HRF). However, there is no quantification of the amount of risk conferred by each HRF or the overall survival (OS) benefit gained by chemotherapy based on the risk factor.

OBJECTIVE

To assess survival benefits associated with adjuvant chemotherapy among stage II colon cancer patients having one or more HRF [T4 tumors, less than 12 lymph nodes examined (< 12LN), positive margins, high-grade tumor, perineural invasion (PNI), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI)].

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage II colon cancer between 2010 and 2013 were identified from California Cancer Registry. Propensity score weighted all-cause mortality hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for combinations of HRF.

RESULTS

A total of 5160 stage II colon cancer patients were identified, of which 2398 had at least one HRF and 510 of 2398 (21%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Compared with patients with a single HRF, presence of any 2 or ≥ 3 HRF showed increasingly poorer survival [HR 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.73 and HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.96-3.20, respectively]. Chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival only among patients with T4 as the single HRF (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.78) or combinations involving T4 as T4/< 12 LN (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.90), T4/high grade (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.61), and T4/LVI (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Not all high-risk features have similar adverse effects on OS. T4 tumors and their combination with other HRF achieve the most survival benefit with adjuvant therapy. Type and number of high-risk features should be taken into consideration when recommending adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer.

A randomised-controlled trial of 1-year adjuvant chemotherapy with oral tegafur-uracil versus surgery alone in stage II colon cancer: SACURA trial

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer is still controversial. The SACURA trial is a randomised-controlled study evaluating the superiority of 1-year adjuvant treatment with oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) to surgery alone for stage II colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to the surgery-alone group or UFT group (UFT at 500-600 mg/day for 5 days, followed by 2-day rest, for 1 year). The primary end-point was disease-free survival (DFS). Target sample size was 2000, determined with one-sided alpha of 0.05, power of 0.9 and assumed hazard ratio (HR) 0.729.

RESULTS

A total of 1982 patients (997 in the surgery-alone group and 985 in the UFT group) were analysed. Median follow-up was 69.5 months, median age was 66 years and for stage IIA/IIB/IIC, the distribution was 84%/13%/3%. The 5-year DFS rate was 78.4% in the surgery-alone group and 80.2% in the UFT group. The HR for DFS was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.10; p = 0.31); superiority of UFT was not demonstrated. Approximately 9% of patients experienced second cancers, which consist 40.7% of the DFS events. The 5-year relapse-free and overall survival rates of the surgery-alone and UFT group were 84.6% and 87.2% (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65-1.04) and 94.3% and 94.5% (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31), respectively. Subgroup analysis failed to disclose superiority in prognosis of adding UFT to the patients with risk factors for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Superiority of 1-year adjuvant UFT over surgery alone was not demonstrated in stage II colon cancer. Patients with risk factors for recurrence did not benefit from UFT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials. Gov. #NCT00392899.

Do High-risk Features Support the Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II Colon Cancer? A Turkish Oncology Group Study

Background

A high-risk group of patients with stage II colon cancer has been identified by the results of studies in Western populations. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic factors of adjuvant chemotherapy in Turkish patients with stage II colon cancer.

Methods

A total of 554 stage II colon cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Three hundred fifty-three patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU-LV, FOLFOX or FLOX) and 201 had received no adjuvant chemotherapy. T4 tumor stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, bowel obstruction and/or perforation, <12 harvested lymph nodes, and poor differentiation were defined as high-risk factors.

Results

The median age of the patients was 62 years (range 26–88). The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 58.1 months (95% CI, 47.6 months to 68.5 months) in the non-treatment group and has not been reached in the treatment group (P <0.01). In univariate analysis, patient age >60 years and T4 tumor stage were statistically significant factors that affected DFS as poor prognostic factors. Adjuvant chemotherapy reduced the risk of recurrence with statistical significance (P <0.01). In multivariate analysis, patient age >60 years and T4 tumor stage were independent risk factors affecting DFS. In addition, adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent favorable prognostic factor for DFS (P <0.01).

Conclusions

Clinical and pathological risk factors in patients with stage II colon cancer may be different in the Turkish population compared to other populations. Further prospective studies in colon cancer are needed to understand the differences in biology and risk factors between races.

Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Stage II Colon Cancer: Analysis of Korean National Data

Purpose

Debates exist regarding the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. This study aimed to investigate the current status of adjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on survival for Korean stage II colon cancer patients by analyzing the National Quality Assessment data.

Materials and Methods

A total of 7,880 patientswho underwent curative resection for stage II colon adenocarcinoma between January 2011 andDecember 2014 in Koreawere selected randomly as evaluation subjects for the quality assessment. The factors that influenced overall survival were identified. The high-risk group was defined as having at least one of the following: perforation/obstruction, lymph node harvest less than 12, lymphovascular/perineural invasion, positive resection margin, poor differentiation, or pathologic T4 stage.

Results

The median follow-up period was 38 months (range, 1 to 63 months). Chemotherapy was a favorable prognostic factor for either the high- (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.59; p < 0.001) or low-risk group (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.89; p=0.002) in multivariate analysis. This was also the case in patients over 70 years of age. The hazard ratio was significantly increased as the number of involved risk factors was increased in patients who didn’t receive chemotherapy. Adding oxaliplatin showed no difference in survival (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.03; p=0.132).

Conclusion

Adjuvant chemotherapy can be recommended for stage II colon cancer patients, but the addition of oxaliplatin to the regimen must be selective.

Prognostic value of pretreatment serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level in patients with colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is one of the most frequently used tumor markers for gastrointestinal cancer, particularly for diagnostic purposes. However, its value in predicting prognosis remains controversial. In this study, we sought to clarify this by conducting a meta-analysis of relevant studies.

METHODS

We systematically searched several databases, including PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for articles pertaining to the relationship between pretreatment serum CA 19-9 levels and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The reported hazard ratios (HR) of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), pooled progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the analyzed studies were compared by fixed effects/random effects models.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies involving 6434 patients with CRC were included in our meta-analysis. A comprehensive analysis of the collected data revealed that high serum CA 19-9 levels before treatment were significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.36-1.83, P<0.001), DFS (HR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.38-2.13, P<0.001), PFS (HR: 1.30,95%CI:0.93-1.82, P = 0.121) and RFS (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.11-1.83, P = 0.006). This association between high pretreatment serum CA 19-9 levels and poor survival held true across different geographical regions, analysis types, methods used for HR determination, sample size, and treatment methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that pretreatment serum CA 19-9 level can be used as a prognostic indicator for patients with CRC.

Ezrin expression combined with MSI status in prognostication of stage II colorectal cancer

Currently used factors predicting disease recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer patients are not optimal for risk stratification. Thus, new biomarkers are needed. In this study the applicability of ezrin protein expression together with MSI status and BRAF mutation status were tested in predicting disease outcome in stage II colorectal cancer. The study population consisted of 173 stage II colorectal cancer patients. Paraffin-embedded cancer tissue material from surgical specimens was used to construct tissue microarrays (TMAs) with next-generation technique. The TMA-slides were subjected to following immunohistochemical stainings: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, ezrin and anti-BRAF V600E antibody. The staining results were correlated with clinicopathological variables and survival. In categorical analysis, high ezrin protein expression correlated with poor disease-specific survival (p = 0.038). In univariate analysis patients having microsatellite instabile / low ezrin expression tumors had a significantly longer disease-specific survival than patients having microsatellite stable / high ezrin expression tumors (p = 0.007). In multivariate survival analysis, the presence of BRAF mutation was associated to poor overall survival (p = 0.028, HR 3.29, 95% CI1.14–9.54). High ezrin protein expression in patients with microsatellite stable tumors was linked to poor disease-specific survival (p = 0.01, HR 5.68, 95% CI 1.53–21.12). Ezrin protein expression is a promising biomarker in estimating the outcome of stage II colorectal cancer patients. When combined with microsatellite status its ability in predicting disease outcome is further improved.

A high preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level is a risk factor for recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Many risk factors for recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) have been proposed, and the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy is still controversial. This study aimed to identify risk factors for tumor recurrence and assess whether they are related to the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II CRC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with stage II CRC that was curatively operated on in a tertiary hospital between 2005 and 2014 were analyzed. Cox's proportional hazards models were applied to identify risk factors for recurrence and overall mortality. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate whether adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

A total of 384 patients were identified, among whom 38 (10%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. In a median follow-up of 48.6 months, 52 patients (14%) developed recurrence. Multivariate analyses identified two independent parameters that significantly decreased RFS; pathological T4 [hazard ratio (HR), 2.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31-4.15; p = .0045) and preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 > 37 U/ml (HR 1.96; 95% CI 1.02-3.58; p = .045). These factors also inversely correlated with overall survival; T4: HR 2.10, p = .019) and CA 19-9 > 37 U/ml (HR 2.15, p = .025). The combination of T4 and CA 19-9 > 37 U/ml resulted in an increased HR (3.52) for recurrence. However, adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve RFS in patients with these features.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated elevated CA 19-9 levels as well as T4 independently predicted worse long-term outcomes in patients with stage II CRC. However, the characterization of patients who gain survival advantages by adjuvant chemotherapy requires further investigation.

Omission of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Patients With T3N0 Colon Cancer With Inadequate Lymph Node Harvest

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy for T3N0 colon cancer is controversial. National guidelines recommend its use in patients with stage II with high-risk features, including lymph node harvest of less than 12, yet this treatment is underused.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T3N0 adenocarcinoma with inadequate lymph node harvest is beneficial.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective population-based study of patients with resected T3N0 adenocarcinoma of the colon.

SETTINGS

The National Cancer Database was queried from 2003 to 2012.

PATIENTS

A total of 134,567 patients with T3N0 colon cancer were included in this analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The use of chemotherapy, short-term outcomes, and overall survival was evaluated. Clinicopathologic factors associated with omission of chemotherapy were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Inadequate lymph node harvest was observed in 23.3% of patients, and this rate decreased over the study period from 46.8% in 2003 to 12.5% in 2012 (p < 0.0001). Overall 5-year survival for patients with T3N0 cancer was 66.8%. Inadequate lymph node harvest among these patients was associated with lower overall 5-year survival (58.7% vs 69.8%; p < 0.001). The use of adjuvant chemotherapy among patients with T3N0 cancer after inadequate lymph node harvest was only 16.7%. In a multivariable analysis, factors associated with failure to receive chemotherapy included advanced age (OR = 0.44 (95% CI, 0.43-0.45)), increased comorbidities (OR = 0.7 (95% CI, 0.66-0.76)), and postoperative readmission (OR = 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67-0.91)). Patients with inadequate lymph node harvest who received adjuvant chemotherapy had improved 5-year survival (chemotherapy, 78.4% vs no chemotherapy, 54.7%; p < 0.001). Even when controlling for all of the significant variables, the administration of chemotherapy remained a predictor of decreased mortality (HR = 0.57 (95% CI, 0.54-0.60); p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective, population-based design.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with T3N0 colon cancer with inadequate lymph node harvest who receive adjuvant chemotherapy have increased overall survival. Despite this survival benefit, a fraction of these patients receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Barriers to chemotherapy are multifactorial.

Stage migration vs immunology: The lymph node count story in colon cancer

Lymph node staging is of crucial importance for the therapy stratification and prognosis estimation in colon cancer. Beside the detection of metastases, the number of harvested lymph nodes itself has prognostic relevance in stage II/III cancers. A stage migration effect caused by missed lymph node metastases has been postulated as most likely explanation for that. In order to avoid false negative node staging reporting of at least 12 lymph nodes is recommended. However, this threshold is met only in a minority of cases in daily practice. Due to quality initiatives the situation has improved in the past. This, however, had no influence on staging in several studies. While the numbers of evaluated lymph nodes increased continuously during the last decades the rate of node positive cases remained relatively constant. This fact together with other indications raised doubts that understaging is indeed the correct explanation for the prognostic impact of lymph node harvest. Several authors assume that immune response could play a major role in this context influencing both the lymph node detectability and the tumor’s behavior. Further studies addressing this issue are need. Based on the findings the recommendations concerning minimal lymph node numbers and adjuvant chemotherapy should be reconsidered.

Sub-classification of Stage II colorectal cancer based on clinicopathological risk factors for recurrence

Purpose

To make a Stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) sub-classification based on clinicopathological factors.

Methods

The subjects of this study were 422 patients with Stage II CRC, who underwent curative surgery with dissection of more than 12 lymph nodes. We used the logistic regression analysis or model and Cox’s proportional hazard regression model for analysis.

Results

Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (p = 0.0057), macroscopic type (p = 0.0316), and depth of invasion (p = 0.0401) were extracted as independent risk factors for recurrence, whereas the preoperative CEA level (p = 0.0045) and depth of invasion (p = 0.0395) were extracted as independent predictors of 5-year disease-free survival. We defined depth of invasion (pT4) and the preoperative CEA level (abnormal) as risk factors for recurrence, and classified Grade A as a normal CEA level regardless of depth invasion, Grade B as depth of invasion to pT3 and an elevated CEA level, and Grade C as depth of invasion to pT4 and an elevated CEA level. There were significant differences in cumulative 5-year disease-free survival rates among each grade (Grade A vs. Grade B, p = 0.0474; Grade A vs. Grade C, p < 0.0001; Grade B vs. Grade C, p = 0.0134).

Conclusion

The sub-classification of Stage II CRC, according not only to depth of invasion but also to preoperative CEA level, is important for predicting the prognosis.

Evaluation of relapse-free survival in T3N0 colon cancer: the role of chemotherapy, a multicentric retrospective analysis

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in Stage II Colon Cancer (CC) is still under debate. Choice should be based on patients and disease characteristics. According to guidelines AC should be considered in high-risk T3N0 patients. No data are available for better option in low-risk patients. The aim of the study is to retrospectively evaluate relapse-free survival (RFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) according to treatment received in T3N0 CC.

Methods

RFS and DFS are evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was developed using stepwise regression, enter limit and remove limit were p = 0.10 and p = 0.15, respectively.

Results

834 patients with T3N0 CC were recruited. Median age was 69 (29–93), M/F 463/371, 335 low-risk patients (40.2%), 387 high-risk (46.4%), 112 unknown (13.4%); 127 (15.2%) patients showed symptoms at diagnosis. Median sampled lymph nodes were 15 (1–76); 353 (42.3%) patients were treated with AC. Median follow up was 5 years (range 3–24). The 5-years RFS was 78.4% and the 5-years DFS was 76.7%. At multivariate analysis symptoms, lymph nodes, and adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic factors for RFS. AC is prognostic factor for all endpoints.

In low-risk group 5-years RFS was 87.3% in treated patients and 74.7% in non-treated patients (p 0.03); in high-risk group was respectively 82.7% and 71.4% (p 0.005).

Conclusions

Data confirmed the role of known prognostic factors and suggest the relevance of adjuvant chemotherapy also in low-risk stage II T3N0 CC patients. However, the highest risk in low-risk subgroup should be identified to be submitted to AC.

Impact of Schwartz enhanced visualization solution on staging colorectal cancer and clinicopathological features associated with lymph node count

BACKGROUND

Stage-specific survival for colon cancer improves when more lymph nodes are reported in the surgical specimen. This has led to a minimum standard of identifying 12 lymph nodes as a quality indicator.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of Schwartz solution increases node yield and impacts pathologic staging.

DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in an academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Included were 104 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Lymph node counts before and after specimen treatment with Schwartz solution and incidence of upstaging were measured.

RESULTS

An additional 20 minutes (interquartile range, 15-40 minutes) was spent searching for lymph nodes, increasing the median number of nodes from 22.5 to 29.0 nodes. However, only 1 patient was upstaged. Schwartz solution decreased the number of specimens with less than 12 lymph nodes from 15 to 6. The following factors were associated with Schwartz solution leading to the detection of additional nodes: number of nodes detected initially with formalin only (p < 0.000), mesenteric fat volume (p < 0.000), mesenteric fat weight (p < 0.000), length of specimen (p < 0.016), tumor greatest dimension (p < 0.016), patient body surface area (p < 0.034), and patient age (p < 0.003).

LIMITATIONS

Clinical data for this study were obtained retrospectively and were not available for all of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Schwartz solution increased the number of nodes detected in 95% of patients and improved compliance with the 12-node standard for colon resection, there was minimal impact on cancer staging. Upstaging is unlikely to explain the increase in overall survival in patients with higher lymph node counts, casting doubt on the validity of this process measure as a meaningful quality indicator. Rather, the lymph node count may be a reflection of inherent tumor biology or host-related factors.

Extramural extension as indicator for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage IIA (pT3N0) colon cancer

The usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy (CMT) in patients with Stage IIA colon cancer remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate extramural extension as an indicator for adjuvant CMT. Data were reviewed from 202 consecutive patients with Stage IIA colon cancer that underwent curative surgery between 1995 and 2007. The distance of the extramural extension (DEE) was measured histologically. The optimal prognostic cut-off point of the DEE for oncologic outcomes was statistically determined. The eligible surviving patients had been followed for a median period of 75 months (range: 2-210 months). Patients were subdivided into two groups according to the optimal cut-off point; DEE ≤5 mm (pT3a) and DEE >5 mm (pT3b). The pT3b was the most powerful independent risk factor for postoperative recurrence (P = 0.0324, HR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.098-8.408), and was significantly correlated with distant metastasis (P = 0.0161 HR: 5.19, 95% CI: 1.765-15.239). The recurrence-free and cancer-specific 5-year survival rates in patients with pT3b were significantly lower than in patients with pT3a (81.5% vs. 95.4%, P = 0.0003 and 85.9% vs. 97.4%, P = 0.0007, respectively). pT3b could be an important risk factor for distant metastasis in Stage IIA colon cancer. Postoperative adjuvant CMT may be indicated for patients with pT3b.

Identification of high-risk factors as indicators for adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer patients treated at a single institution

Although post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is only recommended for patients with stage II colon cancer who are at a high risk of recurrence, the definition of high risk remains unclear. The present study aimed to identify the risk factors for recurrence, which may also be indicators for adjuvant therapy, using a retrospective analysis of clinicopathological data obtained from stage II colon cancer patients who had undergone a curative resection. The present study also investigated the effects of ACT in patients who displayed the risk factors for recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the data collected from 377 stage II colon cancer patients, treated at Kurume University Hospital (Fukuoka, Japan) between 1982 and 2005, was conducted in order to determine and compare the risk factors for recurrence between the 163 patients who had undergone adjuvant therapy and the 214 patients who had not undergone adjuvant therapy. The risk factors for recurrence in patients who had not undergone adjuvant therapy were a serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level that was twice the cut-off value and pre-operative bowel obstruction. Adjuvant therapy provided no benefit to patients who presented with neither risk factor, but significantly decreased the recurrence rate in patients presenting with one or both risk factors. Based on these findings, serum CEA levels of twice the cut-off value and pre-operative bowel obstruction were proposed as indicators in the assessment for adjuvant chemotherapy following a curative resection for stage II colon cancer. These results warrant further clinical study of ACT in patients with one or both risk factors.

Elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Ki67 is predictor of decreased survival in IIA stage colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The present study was designed to investigate the prognostic factors of stage IIA (pT3N0M0) colon cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with stage IIA colon cancer treated with curative surgery alone from January 2004 to June 2008 in Peking University Cancer Hospital. Patient demographics, and clinical, histopathologic, and laboratory data were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify prognostic factors associated with 3-year disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

For the 84 valid cases reviewed in this study, the 3-year DFS was 88.1 %. That for a group with elevated CEA was 77.1 % and for a group with a normal CEA level, it was 95.9 %, with statistical difference (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CEA level (p = 0.012, OR = 8.013, 1.573-40.817), expression of Ki67 (p = 0.099, OR = 3.298, 0.799-3.610), male gender (p = 0.024, OR = 7.212, 1.293-40.237), and anemia (p = 0.011, OR = 6.461, 1.537-27.151) were the independent prognostic factors for 3-year DFS. Stratified analysis revealed that an elevated CEA level combined with high expression of Ki67 was associated with poorer prognosis (3-year DFS 70 %).

CONCLUSIONS

An elevated preoperative serum level of CEA and high expression of Ki67 in tumor tissue were predictors of poor prognosis for patients with stage IIA colon cancer. These patients should therefore be considered candidates for receiving intensive surveillance. Future clinical trials using multicenter patient cohorts should be prospectively performed to evaluate whether these high-risk patients could benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy to improve prognosis.

Colorectal cancer in northwestern iran

Background. Colorectal cancer is the third most prevalent cancer worldwide, which is less common in the Middle East; its prevalence demonstrated to be 7 persons per 100,000 populations in Iran. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic features of CRC patients in West Azerbaijan province of Iran. Methods. In this crosssectional study, 546 patients who underwent surgical procedures with the pathologic diagnosis of colorectal cancer in both academic and private hospitals of Urmia were enrolled. Results. The mean age at diagnosis was 55.2 ± 11.5 years. 23% had an age lower than forty years old. Rectal bleeding (26%), abdominal pain (25%), and large bowel obstruction (23%) were three most common presenting symptoms. 26% of patients presented with acute abdomen. 95% of tumors were adenocarcinoma, 4% were lymphoma, and 1% was other rare tumors. Regarding the stage of cancer according to TNM staging system, 6% of patients were in stage I, followed by 37% in stage II, 33% in stage III, and 24% in stage IV. In 44.5% of patients, the tumor was located in rectum. Conclusion. In west Azerbaijan province of Iran, patients with colorectal cancer present in younger age and more advanced stages in comparison with the developed countries.

Tumor budding is an independent predictor of outcome in AJCC/UICC stage II colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

In colorectal cancer, the morphology of the invasive tumor margin may reflect aggressiveness of tumor growth, thus providing important prognostic information. The tumor growth pattern according to Jass and the extent of tumor budding were analyzed in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) stage II disease.

METHODS

Tumors of 120 randomly selected patients with AJCC/UICC stage II disease were retrospectively reviewed for tumor growth pattern (expanding vs. infiltrating) and the extent of tumor budding, with high-grade budding reflecting presence of 10 or more budding foci scattered at the invasive tumor margin. Progression-free and cancer-specific survivals were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. For multivariable analysis, Cox's proportional hazards regression models were performed.

RESULTS

The infiltrating growth pattern was significantly associated with histological subtype and lymphovascular invasion, while high-grade budding was significantly associated with tumor grade and lymphovascular invasion. High-grade budding, but not the infiltrating growth pattern, was significantly associated with outcome in univariable analysis. Cox's proportional hazards regression models proved tumor budding to be an independent predictor of disease progression (hazard ratio 3.91, 95 % confidence interval 1.3-11.77; P = 0.02) and cancer-related death (hazard ratio 5.90, 95 % confidence interval 1.62-21.51; P = 0.007). The combination of infiltrating growth pattern and high-grade budding did not have a stronger prognostic significance than tumor budding alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor budding independently predicted patient outcome in patients with AJCC/UICC stage II colorectal cancer and may therefore be used for accurate prognostication, patient counseling, and design of clinical trials by using integrated multimodal therapy.