1
|
Kusamura S, Delhorme JB, Taibi A, Villeneuve L, Deraco M, Dico RL, Glehen O, Moran B. The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Pseudomyxoma Peritonei. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:6262-6273. [PMID: 39008204 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15646-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) constitutes the established standard of care for pseudomyxoma peritonei patients. However, the role of HIPEC lacks validation through randomized trials, leading to diverse proposed treatment protocols. This consensus seeks to standardize HIPEC regimens and identify research priorities for enhanced clarity. METHODS The steering committee applied the patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome method to formulate crucial clinical questions. Evaluation of evidence followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Consensus on HIPEC regimens and research priorities was sought through a two-round Delphi process involving international experts. RESULTS Out of 90 eligible panelists, 71 (79%) participated in both Delphi rounds, resulting in a consensus on six out of seven questions related to HIPEC regimens. An overwhelming 84% positive consensus favored combining HIPEC with CRS, while a 70% weak positive consensus supported HIPEC after incomplete CRS. Specific HIPEC regimens also gained consensus, with 53% supporting Oxaliplatin 200 mg/m2 and 51% favoring the combination of cisplatin (CDDP) associated with mitomycin-C (MMC). High-dose MMC regimens received an 89% positive recommendation. In terms of research priorities, 61% of panelists highlighted the importance of studies comparing HIPEC regimens post CRS. The preferred regimens for such studies were the combination of CDDP/MMC and high-dose MMC. CONCLUSIONS The consensus recommends the application of HIPEC following CRS based on the available evidence. The combination of CDDP/MMC and high-dose MMC regimens are endorsed for both current clinical practice and future research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeki Kusamura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, PSM Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - Jean-Baptiste Delhorme
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Abdelkader Taibi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Dupuytren University Hospital, CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, Limoges, France
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Service de Recherche et d'Epidémiologie Cliniques, Pierre-Bénite, France
- CICLY, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Marcello Deraco
- Department of Surgical Oncology, PSM Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Rea Lo Dico
- Department of General Surgery, Emergency, and New Technologies, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Olivier Glehen
- CICLY, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Brendan Moran
- Peritoneal Malignancy Unit, Basingstoke Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van der Speeten K, Kusamura S, Villeneuve L, Piso P, Verwaal VJ, González-Moreno S, Glehen O. The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: HIPEC Technologies. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15513-4. [PMID: 39037523 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15513-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
This manuscript reports the results of an international consensus on technologies of hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) performed with the following goals: To provide recommendations for the technological parameters to perform HIPEC. To identify the role of heat and its application forms in treating peritoneal metastases. To provide recommendations regarding the correct dosimetry of intraperitoneal chemotherapy drugs and their carrier solutions. To identify for each intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen the best dosimetry and fractionation. To identify areas of future research pertaining to HIPEC technology and regimens. This consensus was performed by the Delphi technique and comprised two rounds of voting. In total, 96 of 102 eligible panelists replied to both Delphi rounds (94.1%) with a consensus of 39/51 questions on HIPEC technical aspects. Among the recommendations that met with the strongest consensus were those concerning the dose of HIPEC drug established in mg/m2, a target temperature of at least 42°C, and the use of at least three temperature probes to pursue hyperthermia. Ninety minutes as the ideal HIPEC duration seemed to make consensus. These results should be considered when designing new clinical trials in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Van der Speeten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
- Faculty of Life Sciences, BIOMED Research Institute, University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, PSM unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Vic J Verwaal
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy and HIPEC Institute for Regional Sundhedforskning, Syddansk University, Odense, Sweden
| | | | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kitago M, Endo Y, Aiura K, Takigawa Y, Tani N, Matsui J, Suzuki K, Nishiyama R, Nakano Y, Abe Y, Yagi H, Shinoda M, Itano O, Tanabe M, Kitagawa Y. Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and portal vein infusion chemotherapy followed by gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7459. [PMID: 39030993 PMCID: PMC11258433 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy improves the overall survival (OS) of patients with resected pancreatic cancer, its efficacy requires further improvement. This multicenter, phase II study investigated the efficacy of adjuvant portal vein infusion (PVI) chemotherapy followed by GEM therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/day) and heparin (2000 IU/day) PVI chemotherapy were combined with systemic administration of mitomycin C (4 mg; days 6, 13, 20, and 27) and cisplatin (10 mg; days 7, 14, 21, and 28) for 4 weeks (PI4W), followed by GEM (1000 mg/m2; days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks for 6 months). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) and the secondary endpoints were OS and treatment completion. RESULTS Between November 2010 and August 2013, 53 patients who underwent complete resection were enrolled, including 30, 20, and 3 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies and distal and total pancreatectomies, respectively. In total, 51 (96.2%) patients underwent R0 resection, of whom 3, 2, 12, 35, 0, and 1 had stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III, and IV cancer, respectively, and 47 (88.7%) patients completed PI4W. The median RFS was 22.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years RFS: 64.9%, 38.1%, 38.1%, and 38.1%, respectively), whereas the median OS was 32.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years OS:86.6%, 47.2%, 44.4%, and 44.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION Treatment with PI4W followed by GEM for 6 months after surgery may be beneficial in patients undergoing curative resection of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minoru Kitago
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Koichi Aiura
- Department of SurgeryKawasaki Municipal HospitalKawasakiJapan
| | - Yutaka Takigawa
- Department of SurgeryAshikaga Red Cross HospitalTochigiJapan
- Department of SurgeryTokyo Dental College Ichikawa General HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Noriyuki Tani
- Department of SurgeryTachikawa Kyosai HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Junichi Matsui
- Department of SurgeryTokyo Dental College Ichikawa General HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Keiichi Suzuki
- Department of SurgeryKitasato Institute HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Ryo Nishiyama
- Department of SurgeryIsehara Kyodo HospitalKawasakiKanagawaJapan
| | - Yutaka Nakano
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Yagi
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Masahiro Shinoda
- Digestive Diseases CenterInternational University of Health and Welfare, Mita HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Osamu Itano
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic & Gastrointestinal SurgeryInternational University of Health and Welfare School of MedicineChibaJapan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Buckarma E, Thiels CA, Jin Z, Grotz TE. Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel and Cisplatin for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:622-629. [PMID: 37880514 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14379-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the most common site of dissemination of gastric cancer (GC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for GC with PM remains controversial due to modest survival and significant morbidity. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with GC and PM treated with CRS and HIPEC with cisplatin and paclitaxel for 90 min from June 2019 to December 2022. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were included and received a median of 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-8) cycles of neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Seventeen patients (77%) underwent a single neoadjuvant laparoscopic HIPEC, and six (27%) patients received chemoradiation. The median Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index at the time of CRS was 1 (IQR 0-4), and 21 patients (95%) underwent complete cytoreduction (CC-0). An R0 resection was achieved in 20 (91%) patients, and the median length of stay was 5.5 (IQR 4-7.5) days. There were six (27%) 90-day major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3), one (4%) Common Terminology Classification for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 4 cytopenia, and one (4%) acute kidney injury. The rate of anastomotic leak (all grades) was 14%, the 30-day readmission rate was 18%, and the 90-day mortality rate was 0%. At a median follow-up of 24 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 65%, 56%, and 40%, respectively, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 96%, 78%, and 55%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CRS and HIPEC with paclitaxel and cisplatin is well tolerated and is associated with favorable oncologic and perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- EeeLN Buckarma
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Cornelius A Thiels
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Zhaohui Jin
- GI Care Team, Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Travis E Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Strach MC, Sutherland S, Horvath LG, Mahon K. The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced appendiceal cancers: summary of the literature and future directions. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221112478. [PMID: 35898968 PMCID: PMC9310237 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221112478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Appendiceal cancer is rare and encompasses a diverse group of tumours ranging from low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms to high-grade adenocarcinomas. Appendiceal cancers often spread to the peritoneal cavity causing extensive mucinous dissemination and peritoneal metastases. Prognosis varies with histological subtype. Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy is well-established as the most effective treatment achieving long-term survival in some patients. Chemotherapy regimens used to treat appendiceal cancer are extrapolated from the colorectal cancer setting, but disease biology differs and outcomes are inferior. The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of appendiceal cancer remains poorly defined. There is an urgent need to develop novel tailored treatment strategies in the perioperative and unresectable setting. This review aims to evaluate the literature for patients who received intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy for appendiceal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kate Mahon
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, 119-144 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bhatt A, de Hingh I, Van Der Speeten K, Hubner M, Deraco M, Bakrin N, Villeneuve L, Kusamura S, Glehen O. HIPEC Methodology and Regimens: The Need for an Expert Consensus. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:9098-9113. [PMID: 34142293 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10193-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is performed with a wide variation in methodology, drugs, and other elements vital to the procedure. Adoption of a limited number of regimens could increase the collective experience of peritoneal oncologists, make comparison between studies more meaningful, and lead to a greater acceptance of results from randomized trials. This study aimed to determine the possibility of standardizing HIPEC methodology and regimens and to identify the best method of performing such a standardization. METHODS A critical review of preclinical and clinical studies evaluating the pharmacokinetic aspects of different HIPEC drugs and drug regimens, the impact of hyperthermia, and the efficacy of various HIPEC regimens as well as studies comparing different regimens was performed. RESULTS The preclinical and clinical data were limited, and studies comparing different regimens were scarce. Many of the regimens were neither supported by preclinical rationale or data nor validated by a dose-escalating formal phase 1 trial. All the regimens were based on pharmacokinetic data and did not take chemosensitivity of peritoneal metastases into account. Personalized medicine approaches such as patient-derived tumor organoids could offer a solution to this problem, although clinical validation is likely to be challenging. CONCLUSIONS Apart from randomized trials, more translational research and phases 1 and 2 studies are needed. While waiting for better preclinical and clinical evidence, the best way to minimize heterogeneity is by an expert consensus that aims to identify and define a limited number of regimens for each indication and primary site. The choice of regimen then can be tailored to the patient profile and its expected toxicity and the methodology according regional factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Ignace de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eidhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martin Hubner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marcello Deraco
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Department of Clinical Research, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aiura K, Takahashi S, Matsui J, Ueda M, Kitagawa Y. Beneficial effects of 5-Fluorouracil and heparin-based portal infusion chemotherapy combined with mitomycin C and cisplatin after curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2010; 10:250-8. [PMID: 20484963 DOI: 10.1159/000244265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2009] [Accepted: 09/21/2009] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIMS We retrospectively assessed the benefits of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)- and heparin-based portal infusion chemotherapy combined with systemic administration of mitomycin C (MMC) and cisplatin (CDDP) for 4 weeks following surgery (PI4W). The goal was to determine if this treatment prevented liver metastasis and improved survival for patients with potentially curative resection of pancreatic cancer. METHODS 68 patients who underwent pancreatectomy from January 1995 to August 2007 were treated. Of these cases, 22 patients received portal infusion with 5-FU (250 mg/day) for 2 weeks (PI2W) following surgery, while 25 patients received PI4W therapy (250 mg/day of 5-FU with 2,000 IU/day of heparin everyday for 4 weeks, 4 mg MMC on days 6, 13, 20, 27, and 10 mg CDDP on days 7, 14, 21, 28). The remaining 21 patients were treated without adjuvant therapy during the perioperative period. RESULTS All patients except one completed the portal infusion chemotherapy without toxicity. The cumulative liver metastasis-free survival rate in the PI4W group was significantly higher than those in the other two groups. Furthermore, in the PI4W group, 3-year survival was 82.9% and 5-year survival was 63.8%, rates which were significantly better than those observed in the other two groups. CONCLUSION PI4W therapy after surgery is feasible and could become a promising adjuvant therapy in patients with potentially curative resection of pancreatic cancer. and IAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Aiura
- Department of Surgery at Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|