Bone conduction noise exposure via ventilators in the neonatal intensive care unit

Preventing Excessive Noise Exposure in Infants, Children, and Adolescents

Noise exposure is a major cause of hearing loss in adults. Yet, noise affects people of all ages, and noise-induced hearing loss is also a problem for young people. Sensorineural hearing loss caused by noise and other toxic exposures is usually irreversible. Environmental noise, such as traffic noise, can affect learning, physiologic parameters, and quality of life. Children and adolescents have unique vulnerabilities to noise. Children may be exposed beginning in NICUs and well-baby nurseries, at home, at school, in their neighborhoods, and in recreational settings. Personal listening devices are increasingly used, even by small children. Infants and young children cannot remove themselves from noisy situations and must rely on adults to do so, children may not recognize hazardous noise exposures, and teenagers generally do not understand the consequences of high exposure to music from personal listening devices or attending concerts and dances. Environmental noise exposure has disproportionate effects on underserved communities. In this report and the accompanying policy statement, common sources of noise and effects on hearing at different life stages are reviewed. Noise-abatement interventions in various settings are discussed. Because noise exposure often starts in infancy and its effects result mainly from cumulative exposure to loud noise over long periods of time, more attention is needed to its presence in everyday activities starting early in life. Listening to music and attending dances, concerts, and celebratory and other events are sources of joy, pleasure, and relaxation for many people. These situations, however, often result in potentially harmful noise exposures. Pediatricians can potentially lessen exposures, including promotion of safer listening, by raising awareness in parents, children, and teenagers. Noise exposure is underrecognized as a serious public health issue in the United States, with exposure limits enforceable only in workplaces and not for the general public, including children and adolescents. Greater awareness of noise hazards is needed at a societal level.

Investigating Noise Exposure to Newborn Infants From Respiratory Support: Methodological Considerations

Background and objective Excessive noise in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may lead to serious long-term effects on hearing and sensory development in newborns. As such, the maximum allowed noise level is 45 A-weighted decibels (dBA). Studies regarding noise exposure to ventilated preterm infants show inconsistent results; however, these studies also vary considerably in their methodology in terms of noise ascertainment. We hypothesized that the study methodology can significantly influence data quality when measuring noise levels. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the variations in ventilator noise levels in NICUs could be a result of methodological differences in study designs. Methods A ventilator circuit was set up using nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and high-frequency (HF) modes with nasal prongs. Noise levels were measured using a commercially calibrated noise meter. Three different scenarios were tested: (1) measurements were taken at different angles (0° to 180°), with 180° facing the end of the nasal prongs, without a mannequin, with the membrane/orifice of the noise meter placed 2 mm laterally from the prongs; (2) noise levels were measured at 180° at distances of 0-20 mm from the nasal prongs; (3) measurements were taken in the oral cavity of a life-size intubation mannequin of a newborn baby. Results Overall, the noise levels produced at different settings varied significantly, ranging from 45.7 dB to 82.2 dB. The average environmental background noise was 44.4 dB. Noise levels typically increased as the angle increased, with the highest noise level recorded at 180° for both HF and nCPAP modes, at 58.4 dB and 58.2 dB, respectively. Noise levels recorded at HF were slightly higher than nCPAP values. Furthermore, with regard to distance, the highest mean value, 82.2 dB, was recorded with the noise meter approximately 3 mm from the nasal prongs, and the lowest mean value, 47.6 dB, was recorded at ~20 mm. During trials with the mannequin, the lowest value, 50.1 dB, was recorded at the entrance of the mouth with slightly higher values being recorded within the oral cavity. Conclusion The results indicate that small changes in experimental settings, such as positioning and distance from the nasal prongs, can greatly influence noise levels, particularly above the recommended levels for neonates. These differences may be attributed to wind-generated noise. In summary, some study results are potentially influenced more by the study design than the device type or ventilator setting. We recommend further research and detailed reporting in the NICU to gain deeper insights into the topic.

Newborn Incubators Do Not Protect from High Noise Levels in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Are Relevant Noise Sources by Themselves

BACKGROUND

While meaningful sound exposure has been shown to be important for newborn development, an excess of noise can delay the proper development of the auditory cortex.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the acoustic environment of a preterm baby in an incubator on a newborn intensive care unit (NICU).

METHODS

An empty but running incubator (Giraffe Omnibed, GE Healthcare) was used to evaluate the incubator frequency response with 60 measurements. In addition, a full day and night period outside and inside the incubator at the NICU of the University Hospital Zurich was acoustically analyzed.

RESULTS

The fan construction inside the incubator generates noise in the frequency range of 1.3-1.5 kHz with a weighted sound pressure level (SPL) of 40.5 dB(A). The construction of the incubator narrows the transmitted frequency spectrum of sound entering the incubator to lower frequencies, but it does not attenuate transient noises such as alarms or opening and closing of cabinet doors substantially. Alarms, as generated by the monitors, the incubator, and additional devices, still pass to the newborn.

CONCLUSIONS

The incubator does protect only insufficiently from noise coming from the NICUThe transmitted frequency spectrum is changed, limiting the impact of NICU noise on the neonate, but also limiting the neonate's perception of voices. The incubator, in particular its fan, as well as alarms from patient monitors are major sources of noise. Further optimizations with regard to the sound exposure in the NICU, as well as studies on the role of the incubator as a source and modulator, are needed to meet the preterm infants' multi-sensory needs.

Dysmaturation of Premature Brain: Importance, Cellular Mechanisms, and Potential Interventions

Prematurity, especially preterm birth (less than 32 weeks' gestation), is common and associated with high rates of both survival and neurodevelopmental disability, especially apparent in cognitive spheres. The neuropathological substrate of this disability is now recognized to be related to a variety of dysmaturational disturbances of the brain. These disturbances follow initial brain injury, particularly cerebral white matter injury, and involve many of the extraordinary array of developmental events active in cerebral white and gray matter structures during the premature period. This review delineates these developmental events and the dysmaturational disturbances that occur in premature infants. The cellular mechanisms involved in the genesis of the dysmaturation are emphasized, with particular focus on the preoligodendrocyte. A central role for the diffusely distributed activated microglia and reactive astrocytes in the dysmaturation is now apparent. As these dysmaturational cellular mechanisms appear to occur over a relatively long time window, interventions to prevent or ameliorate the dysmaturation, that is, neurorestorative interventions, seem possible. Such interventions include pharmacologic agents, especially erythropoietin, and particular attention has also been paid to such nutritional factors as quality and source of milk, breastfeeding, polyunsaturated fatty acids, iron, and zinc. Recent studies also suggest a potent role for interventions directed at various experiential factors in the neonatal period and infancy, i.e., provision of optimal auditory and visual exposures, minimization of pain and stress, and a variety of other means of environmental behavioral enrichment, in enhancing brain development.