TORS Base-of-Tongue Mucosectomy in Human Papilloma Virus-Negative Carcinoma of Unknown Primary

Indications for oropharyngeal biopsy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary: A systematic review (HNSCCUP)

INTRODUCTION

Patients presenting with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (HNSCCUP) remain challenging clinical scenarios as large variation exists in practices used to locate the primary.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review is to review of the literature and offer recommendations for oropharyngeal biopsies in HNSCCUP.

METHOD

Pubmed, Medline and Embase were searched to identify studies from inception to October 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

A total of 483 articles were included and screened, 41 studies met the inclusion criteria, including over 3400 patients from the original articles (122 of these patients were reported on in two sequential articles by a single author - table 1) and 4 large metaanalyses including 1852 patients. The primary site identification rate following random biopsies or deep tissue biopsies is less than 5% in most studies. The mean detection rate following ipsilateral tonsillectomy is 34%; two pooled analyses indicate that the mean detection rate following tongue base mucosectomy is 64%, with this figure rising when the tonsils are negative.

CONCLUSIONS

High level evidence is lacking, with heterogeneity in the reported studies. Published meta-analyses are based on retrospective data. There is little evidence supporting the practice of random/non-directed oropharyngeal biopsies. Available evidence supports palatine tonsillectomy and tongue base mucosectomy compared to deep tissue biopsies.

Primary Tumour Detection in Carcinoma of Unknown Primary with Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) Tongue Base Mucosectomy: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) represents a challenging diagnostic process when standard work-up fails to identify the primary tumour site. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic utility and complication profile of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) tongue base mucosectomy (TBM) in the management of CUP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An electronic database search was performed in the EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to obtain an estimate of the overall proportion for the detection and complication rates.

RESULTS

Nine studies representing 235 patients with CUP who had TORS TBM were included in the final analysis. The overall pooled tumour detection rate was 66.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 56.1-75.8]. The incidence of tumour detection in human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive cases (81.5%, 95% CI 60.8-96.4) was significantly higher than HPV-negative cases (2.3%, 95% CI 0.00-45.7). Weighted overall complication rate was 11.4% (95% CI 7.2-16.2). The majority were grade I or II (80%) according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests TORS to be safe and effective in localising the primary tumour site in patients with CUP. While the current data supports the use of TORS in patients who are HPV positive, larger numbers of HPV-negative cases are required to determine the true diagnostic effect with TORS before any valid conclusions can be inferred in this particular subgroup. Further research should focus on high quality prospective trials with stringent methodological work-up to minimise heterogeneity and allow for more accurate statistical analysis.

The emerging role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The role of robotics has grown exponentially. There is an active interest amongst practitioners in the transferability of the potential benefits into plastic and reconstructive surgery; however, many plastic surgeons report lack of widespread implementation, training, or clinical exposure. We report the current evidence base, and surgical opportunities, alongside key barriers, and limitations to overcome, to develop the use of robotics within the field. This systematic review of PubMed, Medline, and Embase has been conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024524237). Preclinical, educational, and clinical articles were included, within the scope of plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2, 181, articles were screened; 176 articles met the inclusion criteria across lymph node dissection, flap and microsurgery, vaginoplasty, craniofacial reconstruction, abdominal wall reconstruction and transoral robotic surgery (TOR). A number of benefits have been reported including technical advantages such as better visualisation, improved precision and accuracy, and tremor reduction. Patient benefits include lower rate of complications and quicker recovery; however, there is a longer operative duration in some categories. Cost presents a significant barrier to implementation. Robotic surgery presents an exciting opportunity to improve patient outcomes and surgical ease of use, with feasibility for many subspecialities demonstrated in this review. However, further higher quality comparative research with careful case selection, which is adequately powered, as well as the inclusion of cost-analysis, is necessary to fully understand the true benefit for patient care, and justification for resource utilisation.

Transoral robotic tongue base mucosectomy for head and neck cancer of unknown primary: six-year outcome experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary is a diagnostic dilemma. The clinical and imaging workup remains ineffective in two-thirds of patients. Transoral robotic surgery has shown an advantage in the primary detection over the previous standard panendoscopy.

METHODS

This is an observational cohort study that took place at a large healthcare centre with robotic surgery experience in head and neck over six-years. All included carcinoma of unknown primary patients followed the standard recommendation for primary identification. Final diagnostic step of robotic tongue base mucosectomy with or without tonsillectomy was introduced. The cancer detection rate in tongue base only, the functional outcome and the effect on the cancer pathway were evaluated.

RESULTS

Carcinoma of unknown primary was reported in 44 per cent of patients. All identified specimens were human papillomavirus positive. There was no significant effect on functional outcome of swallowing and the national 62-day cancer pathway. Robotic surgery allowed optimum treatment of carcinoma of unknown primary in early nodal disease.

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery is a useful paradigm in the management of carcinoma of unknown primary. It is safe with minimal morbidity and good functional outcome after the surgery.

The role of transoral surgery in the diagnosis of the carcinoma of unknown origin of the head and neck

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to update readers on the most recent evidence on the role of trans oral surgery (TOS) in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the unknown primary of the head and neck.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tongue base mucosectomy has an important role in identifying the primary in patients who have had negative imaging, PET CT scans and ipsilateral tonsillectomy. In patients with bilateral nodal disease, tongue base mucosectomy should precede tonsillectomy. There are several unanswered questions that remain regarding sequencing of operations and use of intraoperative frozen section.

SUMMARY

An evidence-based approach to diagnosis is important to ensure the highest detection rates, and least morbidity, in patients with head and neck carcinoma of the unknown primary.

Transoral Robotic Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer: Advances and Residual Knowledge Gaps

Minimally invasive surgery is a growing field in surgical oncology. After acquiring its first Food and Drug Administration approval in 2009 for T1–T2 malignancies of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx, transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has gained popularity thanks to its wristed instruments and magnified three-dimensional view, enhancing surgical comfort in remote-access areas. Its indications are expanding in the treatment of head and neck cancer, i.e., resection of tumors of the larynx, hypopharynx, or parapharyngeal space. However, this expansion must remain cautious and based on high-level evidence, in order to guarantee safety and oncological outcomes which are comparable to conventional approaches. This narrative review assesses the current role of TORS in head and neck cancer from an evidence-based perspective, and then identifies what knowledge gaps remain to be addressed.

Robotic lateral oropharyngectomy following diagnostic tonsillectomy is oncologically safe in patients with human papillomavirus-related squamous cell cancer: Long-term results

INTRODUCTION

To report the long-term oncological and functional outcomes of en bloc TORS lateral oropharyngectomy to address the close/involved margin following diagnostic tonsillectomy in HPV-related SCC of unknown primary.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single tertiary center observational cohort over a 4-year period. Primary outcome measures were disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and PSS NOD (Performance Status Scale-Normalcy of Diet) scores.

RESULTS

TORS specimens did not evidence residual carcinoma in 93% of patients. Of 14 patients, 50% received surgery alone (median follow-up 57 months; range 46-96), the remainder surgery and adjuvant therapy (median follow-up of 58 months; range 51-69) with 100% DSS, OS and no deterioration of PSS NOD scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term oncological outcomes confirm TORS lateral oropharyngectomy alone is an oncologically safe treatment. Due consideration of this approach is warranted to mitigate against the morbidity of adjuvant radiotherapy treatment in this group of patients.

Updates in the management of unknown primary of the head and neck

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from an unknown primary tumor (SCCUP) accounts for 2.0%–5.0% of all head and neck cancers. SCCUP presents as enlarged cervical lymph nodes without evidence of a primary tumor upon physical examination. Primary site detection is important to target treatment and avoid treatment-related morbidity. In this review, we discuss updates in SCCUP management. Diagnostic workup should focus on localization of the primary tumor in SCCUP. Initial workup centers on neck biopsy to confirm the presence of SCC. Given the increasing incidence of HPV-related SCC in the oropharynx, HPV testing is crucial. An HPV-positive status can localize the tumor to the oropharynx, a common site for occult tumors. Imaging includes neck CT and/or MRI, and PET/CT. After imaging, panendoscopy, palatine tonsillectomy or diagnostic transoral robotic surgery can facilitate high rates of primary tumor localization. Primary tumor localization influences treatments administered. SCCUP has traditionally been treated aggressively with large treatment fields to all potential disease sites, which can induce weight loss and swallowing dysfunction. As a result, primary localization can reduce radiation fields and provide possible de-escalation to primary surgical management. Advances in intensity-modulated radiation therapy and dose management also have the potential to improve functional outcomes in SCCUP patients. Given the improved prognosis associated with HPV-positive SCCs, HPV tumor status may also inform future treatment de-intensification to reduce treatment-related toxicity.

Reducing the unknowns: A systematic review & meta-analysis of the effectiveness of trans-oral surgical techniques in identifying head and neck primary cancer in carcinoma unknown primary

OBJECTIVES

The use of transoral robotic surgery (TORS), transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and more recently reported transoral endoscopic electrocautery (TOEC) in identifying the primary cancer in head and neck Carcinoma Unknown Primary (CUP) patients have gained popularity. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of TORS, TLM and TOEC.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out. EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to September 2020. All primary studies were considered for inclusion. Primary outcome measure was detection rates of primary cancer of the different techniques. Secondary outcome measures were complications and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

289 studies were identified of which 30 met the inclusion criteria. The primary cancer was identified in 567 /777 patients (pooled results was 64% (95% CI 54-73). The primary identification rates were 45% and 32% in lingual (n = 273) and palatine tonsillectomy (n = 118) respectively. The primary cancer identification rates by surgical techniques are: TORS was 60% (95% CI 49-70), TLM was 80% (95% CI 0.58, 1.01), TOEC was 41% (95% CI 0.05, 0.76). 529/777 (68%) tumours were Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) related. The pooled data of studies that reported on detection rates relating to HPV status were 178/216 (82%) for HPV +ve and 7/59 (12%) for HPV -ve tumours. Coefficient of variation results suggest heterogenous data for TORS and TLM. The commonest complication was haemorrhage (5.3%). The length of reported hospital stay ranged from 1.4 to 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest systematic review in the subject. The quality of studies and heterogeneity of data limit conclusive findings. Lingual tonsillectomy is an effective procedure in CUP work up. Further larger, multicentre, prospective studies of PET CT negative CUP patients is needed to draw conclusive results.

Human papillomavirus testing in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the neck with unknown primary using PCR on fine-needle aspiration smears: a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE

Squamous cell carcinoma metastasis of the head and neck with unknown primary tumor (CUP) comprises a diagnostic challenge. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on cytologic specimens is gaining increasing focus as this may facilitate an early diagnosis of HPV-induced oropharyngeal carcinoma. This study aimed to prospectively assess PCR-based HPV-DNA testing on FNA smears in a clinical setting.

METHODS

Patients referred to a tertiary Head and Neck Cancer Center with suspected CUP were included from November 2016 to November 2018. Scraped cell material from FNA smears was analyzed for HPV-DNA with PCR using general primers (GP5 + /GP6 +) and correlated with the origin and histology of the primary tumor (oropharynx vs. outside oropharynx or benign tumor). The turn-around time reflecting the workflow for HPV-DNA testing by PCR was also calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients were enrolled in the study. The sensitivity and specificity were 86.7% [95% CI 75.4-94.1%] and 92.0% [95% CI 74.0-99.0%], and the positive and negative predictive values were 96.3% [95% CI 87.3-99.0%] and 74.2% [95% CI 59.9-84.7%], respectively. The turn-around time for HPV testing was a mean four calendar days.

CONCLUSION

HPV-DNA testing on FNA smears can be performed within a reasonable timeframe and can guide for the detection of an HPV-positive oropharyngeal primary tumor in the clinical setting for patients presenting with CUP of the head and neck.

Human Papillomavirus and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary in the Head and Neck Region: A Comprehensive Review on Clinical Implications

Squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP) is a challenging diagnostic subgroup of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). The incidence of SCCUP is increasing in parallel with the well-documented increase in OPSCC and is likewise driven by the increase in human papillomavirus (HPV). The SCCUP patient often presents with a cystic lymph node metastasis and undergoes an aggressive diagnostic and treatment program. Detection of HPV in cytologic specimens indicates an oropharyngeal primary tumor origin and can guide the further diagnostic strategy. Advances in diagnostic modalities, e.g., transoral robotic surgery and transoral laser microsurgery, have increased the successful identification of the primary tumor site in HPV-induced SCCUP, and this harbors a potential for de-escalation treatment and increased survival. This review provides an overview of HPV-induced SCCUP, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options.

Carcinoma of Unknown Primary and the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

In the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer, the classification for carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) changed in addition to oropharyngeal carcinomas. The current classification considers extranodal extension (ENE), determination of p16 (surrogate marker for human papillomavirus), and detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the new classification on the prognosis of p16-positive and p16-negative CUP and the impact of EBV proof.

METHODS

Clinical and pathological data from patients with CUP of the head and neck between 2009 and 2018 were evaluated. The 7th (UICC7) and 8th (UICC8) edition of the Union for International Cancer Control staging system were applied and compared.

RESULTS

There were 97 patients treated, 26.8% women and 73.2% men. The average age at initial diagnosis was 64.6 years. Of which, 58.8% had a documented history of smoking, 37.1% were positive for p16, 4.1% were positive for EBV, and 66% had ENE. Most of the patients were at stage III/IVa (78.4% according to UICC7). According to UICC8, p16+ patients were mainly at stage I (86.1%), and p16- at stage IVb (56.1%). P16 status (P = .002), ENE (P = .001), nodal category (TNM7, P < .001), UICC stage (TNM7, P < .001) and UICC stage (TNM8, P < .001) had a significant impact on survival in the univariate analysis. The 8th TNM classification resulted in a downstaging of p16-positive CUP syndromes and an upstaging of p16-negative syndromes.

CONCLUSION

The 8th TNM classification shows the lower UICC stage in p16-positive CUP syndromes. The prognostic significance for survival has improved from the 7th to the 8th TNM classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE USING THE 2011 OCEBM: Level 3. Laryngoscope, 131:E2534-E2542, 2021.

Transoral robotic surgery in Ireland: the beginning

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has shown promising results in the treatment of myriad head and neck pathologies but is now most commonly used in the investigation and management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to report our cases of the newly introduced TORS, particularly its role in identifying primary of unknown origin and the potential implications for patients. A literature review and our early experience should begin to debunk some of the criticisms of TORS including setup times and cost.

METHODS

Prospective data was collected from all patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery including demographics, indication, histology results in primary of unknown origin and complications.

RESULTS

We have performed 36 TORS procedures in total ranging from intermediate to major complex. Our complication rate is low, and this has improved with the passage of time. Haemorrhage rates remain at 5.6% (n = 2), and the average length of stay is 1 day. Successful identification of a primary tumour in cancer of unknown primary was 80% (n = 8).

CONCLUSIONS

We anticipate the integration of TORS into routine practice in the investigation and management of a number of ENT pathologies following robust clinical trials.

Role of Tonsillectomy in the Management of Carcinomas of Unknown Primary of the Head and Neck: A Retrospective Study Based on p16 Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of tonsillectomy on the detection of the primary tumor, based on p16 immunohistochemistry analysis, in patients with cervical unknown primary of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC-CUP).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 63 patients, included from January 2008 to December 2017 in a single institution. All patients had an initial assessment with physical examination, CT scan of the neck and chest, whole body FDG-PET CT, and endoscopy under general anesthesia, which failed to determine the primary tumor.

Results

Forty-seven out of the 63 patients had an ipsi- or bilateral tonsillectomy which revealed 12 tonsil cancers (26%). The tonsil primary was ipsilateral to positive nodes in 10 cases, contralateral in 1 case and, in 1 case, the patient had bilateral neck involvement. The analysis of the p16 status was carried out in 41/63 patients (65%). Among the 32 patients who had a p16 analysis and tonsillectomy, the rate of primary detection was 59% (10/17) for p16-postives and 0% (0/15) for p16-negatives (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

These results suggest that an extended work-up should be systematically proposed including bilateral tonsillectomy (+/- mucosectomy of the base of tongue) in SCC-CUP p16-positive patients but not in p16-negatives.

Role of Transoral Robotic Surgery in the Work-up of the Unknown Primary

Unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes is a relatively rare tumor presentation, although the incidence may be increasing along with the rising incidence of human papilloma virus-mediated oropharyngeal cancers. Traditional diagnostic methods with palatine tonsillectomy and panendoscopy may identify the minority of primary tumors. The addition of a transoral lingual tonsillectomy may improve the diagnostic yield of identifying a primary tumor. Incorporation of transoral robotic surgery may be used for diagnostic purposes to identify a primary site and also for therapeutic purposes, whereby a primary tumor may be completely resected and combined with a neck dissection.

Is the Da Vinci Xi system a real improvement for oncologic transoral robotic surgery? A systematic review of the literature

In this paper, we reviewed the current literature about TORS procedures performed with Xi system and we discussed the pros and cons of this robotic system comparing it to the previous Si model. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for adequate published studies about TORS procedure performed with da Vinci Si and Xi models. Five papers on the TORS-Xi procedures met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. These papers showed results based on 74 subjects (mean age 60.51 ± 4.55 years old). The most common TORS procedure was performed to address the oropharynx (65 procedures). One case (1.35%) of a tongue base tumor was converted into a transmandibular approach. One subject (1.35%) had a positive margin, while two subjects (2.7%) had close/uncertain margins at final histology. Nine papers on the TORS-Si procedures met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. These papers showed results based on 128 subjects (mean age 59.79 ± 5.93 years old). The most common TORS procedure was performed to address the oropharynx (90 procedures). Three procedures (2.34%) were aborted due to inadequate exposure of the tumor. None of the subject had positive margins, while three subjects (2.34%) had close/uncertain margins at final histology. Despite its improved vision, easier docking and narrower robotic arms, the da Vinci Xi system has structural peculiarities that limit its applications for certain TORS procedures.