1
|
Muigg F, Rossi S, Kühn H, Weichbold V. Perceived social support improves health-related quality of life in cochlear implant patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:4757-4762. [PMID: 38703197 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08706-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Perceived social support has been shown to positively correlate with health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in a variety of conditions. This study investigated whether perceived social support is affecting HR-QoL of patients who receive a cochlear implant (CI) for deafness. METHODS Eighty eight adults (56 males, 32 females; mean age: 60 years) with a uni- or bilateral CI for bilateral high-grade hearing loss were administered two questionnaires: a questionnaire for perceived social support (FSU-14) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) for hearing-specific HR-QoL. Administration of the questionnaires occurred at four points in time: before implantation and three, 12 and 24 months after implant activation. RESULTS The CI patients had quite high levels of perceived social support (mean percentile rank: 71), which remained stable at all four measurement points. Multivariate Analysis showed a significant interaction between perceived social support and HR-QoL indicating that higher perceived social support lead to higher improvement of HR-QoL after cochlear implantation. CONCLUSION The CI patients in this study had higher than average levels of perceived social support, which did not change before and after cochlear implantation. Perceived social support and HR-QoL were related such that patients with high levels of perceived social support experienced greater improvement of their HR-QoL after cochlear implantation than patients with low levels of perceived social support. Based on this finding, perceived social support must be considered as an important factor for HR-QoL after cochlear implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz Muigg
- University Hospital for Hearing, Speech & Voice Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Sonja Rossi
- University Hospital for Hearing, Speech & Voice Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- ICONE, Innsbruck Cognitive Neuroscience, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Heike Kühn
- Comprehensive Hearing Center Würzburg, University-ENT-Hospital, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Viktor Weichbold
- University Hospital for Hearing, Speech & Voice Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Philpott N, Philips B, Donders R, Mylanus E, Huinck W. Variability in clinicians' prediction accuracy for outcomes of adult cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2024; 63:613-621. [PMID: 37782308 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2256973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The variability in outcomes among adult cochlear implant (CI) users poses challenges for clinicians in accurately predicting the benefits of the implant for individual candidates. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and confidence of clinicians in predicting speech perception outcomes for adult CI users one-year post-implantation. DESIGN Participants were presented with comprehensive information on pre-implantation, one-month post-implantation, and six-month post-implantation data for 10 case studies. The cases encompassed a range of one-year post-implantation phoneme scores, from low performers (27%) to high performers (92%). Participants were tasked with predicting the speech perception outcomes for these cases one year after implantation. STUDY SAMPLE Forty-one clinicians completed the full outcome prediction survey. RESULTS Our findings revealed a significant over-prediction of low performance by clinicians. Interestingly, clinicians tended to predict average performance (73-76% phoneme score) even when provided with information suggesting lower-than-average performance. Most clinicians expressed confidence in their predictions, irrespective of their accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Identifying signs of low performance, particularly in the early post-implantation period, can enable clinicians to implement early interventions. Further research into accurate outcome prediction is essential for managing expectations, providing counselling, increasing CI adoption, and optimising clinical care for both high and low performers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki Philpott
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Cochlear Ltd, Mechelen, Belgium
| | | | - Rogier Donders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Emmanuel Mylanus
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy Huinck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dornhoffer JR, Shannon C, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Dubno JR, McRackan TR. Computer-based Auditory Training by New Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Is Associated With Durable Improvements in Cochlear Implant Quality of Life. Ear Hear 2024; 45:905-914. [PMID: 38351509 PMCID: PMC11178477 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The process of adapting to communicate with a cochlear implant (CI) is complex. The use of auditory training after cochlear implantation may help to facilitate improvements in postoperative speech recognition and quality-of-life outcomes in new adult CI recipients. However, the effectiveness of auditory training remains uncertain and long-term effects have not been examined in a large sample of new adult CI users. As such, the objective of this study was to examine the influence of common forms of auditory training on speech recognition and CI-related quality-of-life (CI-related QOL) outcomes at 1 year after cochlear implantation. We hypothesized that patients who reported use of computer-based auditory training (CBAT) would show improved speech and CIQOL-35 Profile scores at 1 year after activation of their implant, compared with their peers. DESIGN This study was designed as a prospective study and was undertaken at a tertiary academic CI center. Participants included 114 adults undergoing cochlear implantation for bilateral hearing loss. Patients serially self-reported use of the following types of post-CI auditory training over their first-year postactivation: (1) face-to-face training (e.g., speech-language pathologist), (2) passive home-based training (e.g., listening to audiobooks), and (3) CBAT (e.g., self-directed software). Outcomes measures for this study included change in Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant phoneme (CNCp), CNC word (CNCw), AzBio sentences in quiet, and CIQOL-35 Profile global and domain scores from pre-CI to 12-mo post-CI. RESULTS Of 114 patients, 94 (82.5%) used one or more auditory training resources. Of these, 19.3% used face-to-face training, 67.5% passive home-based training, and 46.5% CBAT. Of 114 patients, 73 had complete CIQOL data. At 12 mo, only CBAT use was associated with significantly greater improvements in global and all domain-specific CIQOL scores ( d -range = 0.72-0.87), compared with those not using CBAT. Controlling for demographics and use of multiple training resources, CBAT remained the strongest positive predictor of CIQOL improvement, with significant associations with global score (ß = 12.019[4.127,19.9]) and all domain scores at 12-mo post-CI: communication (ß = 11.937[2.456,21.318), emotional (ß = 12.293[1.827,22.759), entertainment (ß = 17.014[5.434,28.774), environment (ß = 13.771[1.814,25.727]), listening effort (ß = 12.523[2.798,22.248]), and social (ß = 18.114[7.403,28.826]). No significant benefits were noted with use of CBAT or any other form of auditory training and speech recognition scores at 12-mo post-CI ( d -range = -0.12-0.22). CONCLUSIONS Auditory training with CBAT was associated with improved CI-related QOL outcomes at 12-mo post-CI. Given its availability and low cost, this study provides evidence to support using CBAT to improve real-world functional abilities in new adult CI recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Dornhoffer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dornhoffer JR, Lohse CM, Tamati TN, Moberly AC, Carlson ML. Current practices and opinions on auditory training in adult cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104339. [PMID: 38677146 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine current practices and opinions of cochlear implant (CI) providers with respect to post-implantation auditory training. METHODS A survey was submitted to the American Cochlear Implant Alliance membership that reviewed current practice and opinions with respect to post-implantation auditory training for adult CI recipients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Review of respondent practice, center volume, role on CI team, and current usage and opinions surrounding auditory training, including resources used and schedule of use. RESULTS Most (79 %) of the 79 CI providers surveyed reported working at academic centers, 34 % at high-volume centers (>150 CIs/year), and 38 % were surgeons. Nearly all (99 %) respondents recommend auditory training for new adult CI recipients. Just over half (52 %) provide auditory training resources to the patient in the form of a broad list of patient-directed exercises from which a patient could select. A specific training resource, generally a computer-based auditory training program (e.g., AngelSound™), is recommended to patients by 30 % of the respondents. Regarding timing of rehabilitation, median preferred start time was 0 months (interquartile range [IQR] 0-1) post-activation. Sessions were preferably performed for a median of 3 h per week (IQR 2-4) and continued for a median of 12 months (IQR 6-12). Recommendations for auditory training were fairly consistent between surgeon and non-surgeon providers and by center volume. Non-surgeons more often had specific recommendations on training resources, benefits of music, and training condition (e.g., contralateral ear plugged). CONCLUSIONS Despite a lack of clinical guidelines for adult post-implantation auditory training, a cross-sectional survey of providers' current practices and opinions demonstrates that these services are widely recommended and regarded as valuable. Training is almost universally patient-directed and believed to be most beneficial if started soon after activation. Interestingly, specific recommendations for which training approaches to use are not common, suggesting a gap in provider knowledge of which resources are most efficacious.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Dornhoffer
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1(st) St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Christine M Lohse
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 1(st) St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Terrin N Tamati
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr., Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Aaron C Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr., Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Matthew L Carlson
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1(st) St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic; 200 1(st) St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brooks KA, Altartoor K, Vivas EX. Quality of Life With Cochlear Implantation Using the CIQOL-35 at a Tertiary Urban Medical Center: Our Experience. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:507-512. [PMID: 38518763 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assessment of quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 questionnaire (CIQOL-35). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Single-institution tertiary care center. PATIENTS Patients 18 years and older who have undergone CI and CIQOL-35 survey. INTERVENTIONS Implementing CIQOL-35 from 2019 to 2022 to measure change in QOL after CI. Statistical analysis included nonparametric, univariate, and multivariate analyses. Significance was set at 0.05. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Differences in QOL among CI patients in each of the CIQOL-35 domains. RESULTS Ninety-three patients (40 female, 53 male) aged 20 to 93 years (median 70 years) turned in 164 QOL surveys (68 preactivation, 96 postactivation). Postactivation median QOL was 5 to 15 points higher across all domains ( p < 0.001). QOL score distributions among unilateral CI only, bilateral CI, and unilateral CI with contralateral hearing aid users were not statistically different ( p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified that male sex ( β = -2.0; 95% confidence interval, -3.9 to -0.1) was a negative predictor for environment scores and not being married ( β = 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 4.0) was a positive predictor for entertainment scores. Median follow-up time was 13 months post-CI (interquartile range [IQR], 7.1-21.5 months). CONCLUSIONS CI patients experienced improved QOL postactivation among all QOL domains, whereas specific CI use pattern in regard to unilateral, bilateral, or bimodal did not affect QOL. Multivariate analysis identified marital status and sex as possible QOL predictors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn A Brooks
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khayr R, Khnifes R, Shpak T, Banai K. Task-Specific Rapid Auditory Perceptual Learning in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: What Could It Mean for Speech Recognition. Ear Hear 2024:00003446-990000000-00285. [PMID: 38829780 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Speech recognition in cochlear implant (CI) recipients is quite variable, particularly in challenging listening conditions. Demographic, audiological, and cognitive factors explain some, but not all, of this variance. The literature suggests that rapid auditory perceptual learning explains unique variance in speech recognition in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss. The present study focuses on the early adaptation phase of task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning. It investigates whether adult CI recipients exhibit this learning and, if so, whether it accounts for portions of the variance in their recognition of fast speech and speech in noise. DESIGN Thirty-six adult CI recipients (ages = 35 to 77, M = 55) completed a battery of general speech recognition tests (sentences in speech-shaped noise, four-talker babble noise, and natural-fast speech), cognitive measures (vocabulary, working memory, attention, and verbal processing speed), and a rapid auditory perceptual learning task with time-compressed speech. Accuracy in the general speech recognition tasks was modeled with a series of generalized mixed models that accounted for demographic, audiological, and cognitive factors before accounting for the contribution of task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning of time-compressed speech. RESULTS Most CI recipients exhibited early task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning of time-compressed speech within the course of the first 20 sentences. This early task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning had unique contribution to the recognition of natural-fast speech in quiet and speech in noise, although the contribution to natural-fast speech may reflect the rapid learning that occurred in this task. When accounting for demographic and cognitive characteristics, an increase of 1 SD in the early task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning rate was associated with ~52% increase in the odds of correctly recognizing natural-fast speech in quiet, and ~19% to 28% in the odds of correctly recognizing the different types of speech in noise. Age, vocabulary, attention, and verbal processing speed also had unique contributions to general speech recognition. However, their contribution varied between the different general speech recognition tests. CONCLUSIONS Consistent with previous findings in other populations, in CI recipients, early task-specific rapid auditory perceptual, learning also accounts for some of the individual differences in the recognition of speech in noise and natural-fast speech in quiet. Thus, across populations, the early rapid adaptation phase of task-specific rapid auditory perceptual learning might serve as a skill that supports speech recognition in various adverse conditions. In CI users, the ability to rapidly adapt to ongoing acoustical challenges may be one of the factors associated with good CI outcomes. Overall, CI recipients with higher cognitive resources and faster rapid learning rates had better speech recognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranin Khayr
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Studies, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Technion-Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Riyad Khnifes
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Studies, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Technion-Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Talma Shpak
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Technion-Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Karen Banai
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Studies, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brewer DM, Bernstein CM, Calandrillo D, Muscato N, Introcaso K, Bosworth C, Olson A, Vovos R, Stillitano G, Sydlowski S. Teledelivery of Aural Rehabilitation to Improve Cochlear Implant Outcomes. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:1861-1867. [PMID: 37688797 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) This randomized controlled study evaluated the effectiveness of a Telehealth Aural Rehabilitation (TeleAR) training protocol to improve outcomes for adult cochlear implant (CI) users. METHODS This was a multisite clinical study with participants randomized to either an AR treatment or active control group. The AR protocol consisted of auditory training (words, sentences, and speech tracking), informational counseling, and communication strategies. The control group participants engaged in cognitive stimulation activities (crosswords, sudoku, etc.). Each group completed 6 weekly 90-min individual treatment sessions delivered remotely. Twenty postlingually deafened adult CI users participated. Assessments were completed pretreatment and 1 week and 2 months posttreatment. RESULTS Repeated-measures ANOVA and planned contrasts were used to compare group performance on AzBio Sentences, Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI), and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). The two groups were statistically equivalent on all outcome measures at pre-assessment. There was a statistically significant main effect of time for all measures. Improvement over time was observed for participants in both groups, with greater improvement seen for the AR than the CT group on all outcome measures. The AR group showed medium to large effect sizes on all measures over time, suggesting clinically significant outcomes. CONCLUSION This randomized controlled study provides evidence of improved speech recognition and psychosocial outcomes following 6 weeks of TeleAR intervention. For adult post-lingually deafened CI users, including those >3 months post-activation, AR treatment can leverage neuroplasticity to maximize outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 134:1861-1867, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Majerus Brewer
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | - Claire Marcus Bernstein
- Department of Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | - Dominique Calandrillo
- Department of Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | - Nancy Muscato
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A
| | - Kailey Introcaso
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A
| | - Cassandra Bosworth
- Audiology and Speech Pathology in Department of Otolaryngology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, U.S.A
| | - Anne Olson
- Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Kentucky College of Health Sciences, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A
| | - Rachel Vovos
- The Cleveland Clinic, Hearing Implant Program, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Gina Stillitano
- The Cleveland Clinic, Hearing Implant Program, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Sarah Sydlowski
- The Cleveland Clinic, Hearing Implant Program, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zeitler DM, Prentiss SM, Sydlowski SA, Dunn CC. American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force: Recommendations for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Adults. Laryngoscope 2024; 134 Suppl 3:S1-S14. [PMID: 37435829 PMCID: PMC10914083 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
The indications for cochlear implantation have expanded over time due to evidence demonstrating identification and implantation of appropriate cochlear implant (CI) candidates lead to significant improvements in speech recognition and quality of life (QoL). However, clinical practice is variable, with some providers using outdated criteria and others exceeding current labeled indications. As a results, only a fraction of those persons who could benefit from CI technology receive it. This document summarizes the current evidence for determining appropriate referrals for adults with bilateral hearing loss into CI centers for formal evaluation by stressing the importance of treating each ear individually and a "revised 60/60 rule". By mirroring contemporary clinical practice and available evidence, these recommendations will also provide a standardized testing protocol for CI candidates using a team-based approach that prioritizes individualized patient care. This manuscript was developed by the Adult Cochlear Implantation Candidacy Task Force of the American Cochlear Implant Alliance using review of the existing literature and clinical consensus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:S1-S14, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M. Zeitler
- Listen for Life Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Sandra M. Prentiss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | | | - Camille C. Dunn
- The University of Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dornhoffer JR, Chidarala S, Patel T, Khandalavala KR, Nguyen SA, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Dubno JR, Carlson ML, Moberly AC, McRackan TR. Systematic Review of Auditory Training Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes. J Clin Med 2024; 13:400. [PMID: 38256533 PMCID: PMC10816985 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: to review evidence on the efficacy of auditory training in adult cochlear implant recipients. Data Sources: PRISMA guidelines for a systematic review of the literature were followed. PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were queried on 29 June 2023 for terms involving cochlear implantation and auditory training. Studies were limited to the English language and adult patient populations. Study Selection: Three authors independently reviewed publications for inclusion in the review based on a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria encompassed adult cochlear implant populations, an analysis of clinician- or patient-directed auditory training, and an analysis of one or more measures of speech recognition and/or patient-reported outcome. Exclusion criteria included studies with only pediatric implant populations, music or localization training in isolation, and single-sample case studies. Data Extraction: The data were collected regarding study design, patient population, auditory training modality, auditory training timing, speech outcomes, and data on the durability of outcomes. A quality assessment of the literature was performed using a quality metric adapted from the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group guidelines. Data Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: Data were qualitatively summarized for 23 studies. All but four studies demonstrated significant improvement in at least one measured or patient-reported outcome measure with training. For 11 studies with sufficient data reporting, pre-intervention and post-intervention pooled means of different outcome measures were compared for 132 patients using meta-analysis. Patient-direct training was associated with significant improvement in vowel-phoneme recognition and speech recognition in noise (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively), and clinician-directed training showed significant improvement in sentence recognition in noise (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The literature on auditory training for adult cochlear implant recipients is limited and heterogeneous, including a small number of studies with limited levels of evidence and external validity. However, the current evidence suggests that auditory training can improve speech recognition in adult cochlear implant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R. Dornhoffer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY 55905, USA; (J.R.D.); (K.R.K.); (M.L.C.)
| | - Shreya Chidarala
- College of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA;
| | - Terral Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA;
| | - Karl R. Khandalavala
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY 55905, USA; (J.R.D.); (K.R.K.); (M.L.C.)
| | - Shaun A. Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; (S.A.N.); (K.C.S.-L.); (J.R.D.)
| | - Kara C. Schvartz-Leyzac
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; (S.A.N.); (K.C.S.-L.); (J.R.D.)
| | - Judy R. Dubno
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; (S.A.N.); (K.C.S.-L.); (J.R.D.)
| | - Matthew L. Carlson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY 55905, USA; (J.R.D.); (K.R.K.); (M.L.C.)
| | - Aaron C. Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA;
| | - Theodore R. McRackan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; (S.A.N.); (K.C.S.-L.); (J.R.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gfeller K, Mallalieu R. Psychosocial and auditory factors that influence successful music-based auditory training in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17:1308712. [PMID: 38178994 PMCID: PMC10764544 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1308712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cochlear implants (CIs), which are designed to support spoken communication of persons with severe to profound hearing loss, can provide improved hearing capability through passive exposure. However, auditory training may optimize perception of spectrally complex sounds such as music or speech. Reviews of music-based training for pediatric CI users have reported modest though variable benefits, as well as problems with attrition. It is presumed that more substantial changes may result from longer, more intensive training; however, the development of protocols sufficiently motivating for sustained intensity is challenging. This article examined the experiences of star pediatric CI users, whose years of music training have yielded exceptional auditory benefits. Greater understanding of their experiences and attitudes may suggest best practices for music-based training. Research aims included: (a) characterizing the musical behaviors and perceptual learning processes of music-centric (Music-centric, for purposes of this paper, refers to CI users who engage in sustained and successful music making such as music lessons and ensembles and focused music listening over a period of years, and who derive deep satisfaction from those experiences.) pediatric CI users, and (b) identifying psychosocial and auditory factors that motivated persistence in auditory training. Methods We used qualitative and patient-engaged research methodologies, gathering data through questionnaires with open-ended questions. The participants, six music-centric CI users and five parents, described their experiences and attitudes regarding music training, and factors that supported or undermined those experiences. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results The codes were consolidated into five themes and organized into a Model of Music-Based Learning for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients. Sustained participation in music training was perceived as a dynamic process including varied musical stimuli, and moderated by intrinsic (attitude, perceived behavioral control) and extrinsic (parents, teachers, peers) influences, hearing status, sound access and background factors. Discussion These themes highlighted motivational factors that pediatric CI users and parents considered important to sustained, intensive and successful music learning throughout childhood and adolescence. These factors should be considered in the development of music-based training for pediatric CI recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Gfeller
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, School of Music, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Ruth Mallalieu
- Bodleian Libraries, The University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shannon CM, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Dubno JR, McRackan TR. Determinants of Cochlear Implant Satisfaction and Decisional Regret in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:e722-e729. [PMID: 37853774 PMCID: PMC10840889 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determine associations expected and actual cochlear implant (CI) outcomes, decisional regret, and satisfaction in experienced adult CI users. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional cohort study. SETTING Tertiary medical center. PATIENTS Thirty-nine adult CI users meeting traditional bilateral hearing loss indications with ≥12 months CI experience. INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patients completed the validated Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Living and Decisional Regret instruments. Pre- and post-CI outcomes (CI Quality of Life [CIQOL]-Expectations; CIQOL-35 Profile; CNC words, AzBio Sentences) were obtained from a prospectively maintained clinical database. RESULTS Using established cutoff scores, 29% of patients reported a substantial degree of post-CI decisional regret. For each CIQOL domain, patients without decisional regret obtained post-CI outcome scores closer to pre-CI expectations compared with patients with decisional regret ( d = 0.34 to 0.91); similar results were observed with higher CI user satisfaction ( d = 0.17-0.83). Notably, the degree of pre- to post-CI improvement in CNC or AzBio scores did not differ between patients with and without decisional regret or with lower and higher satisfaction. Finally, greater pre-/postimprovement in CIQOL-35 Profile domain scores demonstrated far stronger associations with lower decisional regret and higher satisfaction than changes in speech recognition scores. CONCLUSIONS Patients with better alignment of their pre-CI expectations and post-CI outcomes and greater pre-/post-CIQOL improvement had lower decisional regret and higher satisfaction. This emphasizes the importance of evidence-based pre-CI counseling regarding real-world CI benefits and caution against assuming that improvements in speech recognition are related to patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian M. Shannon
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Kara C. Schvartz-Leyzac
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Judy R. Dubno
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Theodore R. McRackan
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lassaletta L, Calvino M, Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Skarzynski PH, Cywka KB, Czajka N, Kutyba J, Tavora-Vieira D, Van de Heyning P, Mertens G, Staecker H, Humphrey B, Zernotti M, Zernotti M, Magele A, Ploder M, Zabeu JS. QoL, CIs, QALYs, and Individualized Rehabilitation: The Clinical and Practical Benefits of Regularly Assessing the Quality of Life of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6906. [PMID: 37887644 PMCID: PMC10605987 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20206906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to report quality of life (QoL) scores in unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users and to generate guidance for clinicians on using QoL measures to individualize CI counselling and rehabilitation and to increase access to CIs as a mode of rehabilitation. Participants (n = 101) were unilateral CI users with single-sided deafness (SSD; n = 17), asymmetrical hearing loss (AHL; n = 26), or bilateral hearing loss (Uni; n = 58). Generic QoL was assessed via the Health Utilities Index (HUI-3), and disease-specific QoL was assessed via the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) and Nijmegen CI Questionnaire (NCIQ) at preimplantation and at 6 and 12 months of CI use. All groups had significantly increased HUI-3 scores at both intervals. The SSD group showed significant benefit on the SSQ12 at visit 3, the AHL group showed significant benefit on the SSQ12 and most NCIQ subdomains at both intervals, and the Uni group showed significant benefit with both tests at both intervals. Unilateral CI recipients demonstrate improved QoL within the first 12 months of device use. Regular assessment with generic and disease-specific questionnaires has the potential to play an important role in personalizing treatment and possibly in increasing access to CI provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Lassaletta
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.C.); (I.S.-C.)
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, (CIBERER-U761), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Miryam Calvino
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.C.); (I.S.-C.)
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, (CIBERER-U761), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.C.); (I.S.-C.)
| | - Piotr Henryk Skarzynski
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | - Katarzyna B. Cywka
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | - Natalia Czajka
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | - Justyna Kutyba
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | | | - Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium; (P.V.d.H.); (G.M.)
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium; (P.V.d.H.); (G.M.)
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- ENT Department, University of Kansas Medical Centre, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.S.); (B.H.)
| | - Bryan Humphrey
- ENT Department, University of Kansas Medical Centre, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.S.); (B.H.)
| | - Mario Zernotti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sanatorio Allende de Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina; (M.Z.); (M.Z.)
| | - Maximo Zernotti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sanatorio Allende de Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina; (M.Z.); (M.Z.)
| | - Astrid Magele
- ENT Department, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria; (A.M.)
| | - Marlene Ploder
- ENT Department, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria; (A.M.)
| | - Julia Speranza Zabeu
- Hospital de Reabilitacão de Anomalias Craniofaciais da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Campus Bauru, Bauru 17012-230, Brazil;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Casazza JA, Yancey KL, Hunter JB. The Influence of Activities and Functional Social Support on Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY OPEN 2023; 3:e033. [PMID: 38516123 PMCID: PMC10950132 DOI: 10.1097/ono.0000000000000033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study is to assess whether patient participation in specific activities and perceived social support correlate with speech perception following cochlear implantation. Setting Tertiary referral hospital. Methods Adult cochlear implantation patients implanted in their poorer hearing ear between January 2019 and December 2020 completed the Functional Social Support Questionnaire (FSSQ) and a modified version of the Victoria Lifestyle Study-Activities Lifestyle Questionnaire (VLS-ALQ). Demographics, FSSQ score, and individual activities were correlated with implanted ear and binaural AzBio scores. Results Twenty-three patients completed the survey and had at least 6 months of follow-up with appropriate speech perception testing. The average age at survey completion was 71.7 (SD, 9.1). Average pure-tone average in the contralateral ear was 70.1 (SD: 20) dB. The majority (N = 21, 91.3%) wore a hearing aid in the contralateral ear following cochlear implantation. Mean AzBioQuiet score improvement was 60.6% (range: 20%-99%) in the implanted ear and 42.6% (range: -2% to 67%) binaurally. Work-related social support correlated positively with improvement in the implanted ear (Pearson's R = 0.473; 95% CI, 0.075-0.741; P = 0.023). Improvement in the implanted ear correlated positively with creative writing (R = 0.542; 95% CI, 0.167-0.780; P = 0.008), attending films (R = 0.448; 95% CI, 0.044-0.726; P = 0.032), going out with friends (R = 0.423; 95% CI, 0.013-0.711; P = 0.044) listening to audiobooks (R = 0.433; 95% CI, 0.025-0.717; P = 0.039), and public speaking (R = 0.468; 95% CI, 0.069-0.738; P = 0.024). Gains in binaural performance correlated positively with watching TV news (R = 0.819; 95% CI, 0.509-0.941; P < 0.001) and negatively with eating at restaurants (R = -0.532; 95% CI, -0.829 to -0.002; P = 0.05). Conclusions Activities that provide intellectual stimulation and engage auditory faculties correlate with greater speech perception testing improvements in adult cochlear implantation patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia A Casazza
- Medical School, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kristen L Yancey
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jacob B Hunter
- Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dornhoffer JR, Kinkhabwala CM, Chidarala S, Ma C, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Meyer TA, Sterba KR, Dubno JR, McRackan TR. Patient-Related Factors Do Not Predict Use of Computer-Based Auditory Training by New Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:e81-e87. [PMID: 36624594 PMCID: PMC9835008 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of computer-based auditory training (CBAT) after cochlear implantation is associated with improved speech recognition and real-world functional abilities. However, patient-related factors associated with CBAT use remain unknown. This study seeks to identify such factors and recognize those at risk for not implementing CBAT. STUDY DESIGN Prospective natural experiment. SETTING Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS A total of 117 new adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with bilateral moderate-to-profound hearing loss. INTERVENTIONS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patient demographic and lifestyle information, preimplantation aided speech recognition scores, Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) domain and global scores, CIQOL-Expectations scores, and CBAT use in the first 3 months after activation. Patient-related variables included age, sex, race, duration of hearing loss before implantation, hours of CI use per day, hearing-aid use before implantation, living arrangements/marital status, annual household income, employment, technology use, and education. RESULTS Overall, 33 new CI users (28.2%) used CBAT in the first 3 months after activation. On bivariate analysis of the pre-CI CIQOL scores, CIQOL-Expectations score, aided speech recognition scores, and demographic/lifestyle factors examined, regular use of smartphone, tablet, or computer technology was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of CBAT use (odds ratio, 9.354 [1.198-73.020]), whereas higher CIQOL-Expectations emotional domain scores were associated with a lower likelihood of CBAT use (d = -0.69 [-1.34 to -0.05]). However, using multivariable analysis to control for potential confounding factors revealed no significant associations between CBAT use in the first 3 months after cochlear implantation and any examined factor. CONCLUSIONS No associations between patient demographic, lifestyle, or pre-CI speech recognition and patient-reported outcome measures and CBAT use were identified. Therefore, discussions with all patients after implantation on the availability of CBAT and its potential benefits are warranted. In addition, given the limited overall use of CBAT and its association with improved CI outcomes, future studies are needed to investigate facilitators and barriers to CBAT use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Dornhoffer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
McRackan TR, Hand BN, Velozo CA, Dubno JR. Development and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging System. Laryngoscope 2022; 132 Suppl 12:S1-S13. [PMID: 36082873 PMCID: PMC9650765 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to develop and implement a functional staging system using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) framework. The CIQOL-35 Profile was developed and validated following a rigorous research design and found to be more comprehensive and psychometrically sound than previous patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) applied to adult CI users. However, interpreting the CIQOL-35 Profile (and all PROMs) relative to real-world functioning remains difficult for patients and clinicians, which limits the capacity of PROMs to direct clinical care. To address this limitation, a functional staging system based on PROM scores was developed to provide detailed descriptions of patients' self-reported abilities (clinical vignettes) without sacrificing the inherent value of the psychometrically derived scores. The current study (1) creates an evidence-based CIQOL functional staging system using advanced psychometric techniques, (2) confirms the clarity and meaningfulness of the staging system with patients, and (3) implements the staging system to measure CIQOL stage progression using data from a longitudinal study design. METHODS Item response theory (IRT) analyses of CIQOL-35 Profile data from 705 experienced adult CI users and expert opinion were used to determine the cut-scores that separated adjacent stages for the six CIQOL-35 domains (communication, emotional, entertainment, environment, listening effort, and social). The research team then created clinical vignettes based on item response patterns for each stage. Semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted with 10 adult CI users to determine the clarity and meaningfulness of the CIQOL stages and associated clinical vignettes. Finally, we prospectively collected CIQOL-35 Profile scores from 42 CI users prior to cochlear implantation and then at 3- and 6-months post-CI activation to measure CIQOL stage progression. RESULTS Psychometric analyses identified five statistically distinct stages for the communication domain and three stages for all other domains. Using IRT analysis results for guidance, research team members independently identified the cut-scores that represented transitions between the functional stages for each domain with excellent agreement (κ = 0.98 [95% confidence interval 0.96-0.99]). Next, the key informant interviews revealed that CI users found the clinical vignettes to be clear and only minor changes were required. Participants also agreed that stage progression represented meaningful improvements in functional abilities. Finally, 88.1% of 42 patients in the prospective cohort (n = 37) improved from pre-CI functional stage by at least one functional stage in one or more domains. The communication domain had the greatest number of patients improve by one or more stages (59.5%) and the social domain the fewest (25.6%). There was also a trend for less improvement at 3- and 6-months post-CI activation for patients at higher pre-CI functional stages, even though higher stages were achievable. CONCLUSION The new CIQOL functional staging system provides an evidence-based understanding of the real-world functional abilities of adult CI users from pre-CI to 3- to 6-months post-CI activation across multiple domains. In addition, study results provide the proportion of CI users in each stage at each timepoint. Results can be used during discussions of expectations with potential CI users to provide enhanced insight regarding realistic outcomes and the anticipated timing for improvements. The use of the CIQOL functional staging system also presents an opportunity to develop individualized goal-based rehabilitation strategies that target barriers to stage advancement faced by CI users. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 132:S1-S13, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore R McRackan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Brittany N Hand
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Craig A Velozo
- Division of Occupational Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Judy R Dubno
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A Five-Year Update on the Profile of Adults Undergoing Cochlear Implant Evaluation and Surgery-Are We Doing Better? Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e992-e999. [PMID: 36047696 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the influence of expanding indications on the profile of adults undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) at a high-volume CI center. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS 774 adults undergoing CI evaluation from August 2015 to August 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Demographics; audiometry; speech recognition; speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ-12). RESULTS Of 745 (96.3%) patients qualifying for implantation, 642 (86.6%) pursued surgery. Median age at evaluation was 69 years; 56.3% were men; 88.2% were Caucasian. Median distance to our center was 95 miles. The majority (51.8%) had public insurance (Medicare, Medicaid), followed by private (47.8%) and military (0.4%). Mean PTA, CNC, and AzBio in quiet and noise for the ear to be implanted were 85.2 dB HL, 15.0%, and 19.2% and 3.5%, respectively. Hybrid/EAS criteria were met by 138 (18.5%) CI candidates, and 436 (77.0%) unilateral CI recipients had aidable contralateral hearing for bimodal hearing configurations. Younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.99) and non-Caucasian race (OR, 6.95; 95% confidence interval, 3.22-14.98) predicted candidacy. Likelihood of surgery increased for Caucasian (OR, 8.08; 95% confidence interval, 4.85-13.47) and married (OR, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-3.47) patients and decreased for those with public insurance (OR, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.69). A lower SSQ-12 score predicted both candidacy and surgery. CONCLUSION Despite expansions in criteria, speech understanding remained extremely low at CI evaluation. Younger age and non-Caucasian race predicted candidacy, and Caucasian, married patients with private insurance and lower SSQ scores were more likely to pursue surgery.
Collapse
|
17
|
Factors Influencing Postoperative Experiences in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Multistakeholder Perspective. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:882-888. [PMID: 35970152 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore factors influencing postoperative experiences of adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients, determine the impact of each factor, and conceptualize recipients' postoperative journey. STUDY DESIGN Participatory mixed methods; concept mapping. SETTING Tertiary care (private and public). PATIENTS Ninety-three participated in the brainstorming activity. Eighty-nine completed the sorting tasks (96% retention rate): CI recipients (n = 44), significant others (n = 13), CI audiologists (n = 14) and surgeons (n = 5), CI clinics' administration staff (n = 5) and managers (n = 3), and CI manufactures' clinical support staff (n = 5). INTERVENTIONS Rehabilitative (CIs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Statements were generated and rated by participants. Similarity of grouping of the statements informed the matrices used for cluster analysis to form concepts. RESULTS Eighty-seven unique statements described the factors influencing adapting to, use, and maintenance of CIs after implantation. These were grouped, and five concepts were identified: financial considerations, complications, device usability and durability, device programming and adaptation, and patient motivation and supports. Although statements within the concepts financial considerations and complications were negatively rated, statements within the concepts device programming and adaptation, and patient motivation and supports were mostly rated as having positive influence in patients' postoperative journey. The concept device usability and durability contained both negatively and positively rated statements. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative experience of adult CI recipients is a multifaceted journey with several challenges to address to improve services. Although support from and connection with family and clinicians, and simplicity of using a CI device facilitated the experience, medical and surgical complications, durability, and cost of maintaining the device challenged the postoperative experience.
Collapse
|
18
|
Association of Self-Reported Coping Strategies With Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e888-e894. [PMID: 35970167 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the degree to which individual coping strategies may influence speech perception after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Adult, postlingually deaf cochlear implant recipients. INTERVENTIONS The Coping Orientation to Problems Experience inventory, a validated, multidimensional self-reported coping scale, was administered preoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Speech perception was measured using consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) phoneme and word scores, AzBio sentence accuracy in quiet and noise, and Hearing in Noise Test sentences in quiet preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Quality of life was measured with the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were included in this study. Mean age at surgery was 70.7 ± 11.4 years. Acceptance was associated with a decreased AzBio in noise score in the 6 months after CI (regression coefficient b = -0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07 to -0.03; p < 0.01). Denial was associated with a decreased AzBio in quiet score (b = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.09 to -0.01; p < 0.05), whereas humor was associated with an increased AzBio in quiet score (b = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.04; p < 0.05). Humor was also associated with an increased Hearing in Noise Test score (b = 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07; p < 0.05). Denial was associated with decreased CNC word (b = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.02; p < 0.01) and phoneme (b = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.02; p < 0.01) scores, whereas substance use was associated with increased CNC word (b = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.05, p < 0.01) and phoneme (b = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06; p < 0.01) scores. Scores on self-reported quality of life measures were not significantly correlated with coping strategies. CONCLUSION A variety of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies are used by postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant users. Denial and acceptance may be more predictive of poor speech performance, whereas humor and substance use may be more predictive of improved speech performance.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ma C, Fried J, Nguyen SA, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Camposeo EL, Meyer TA, Dubno JR, McRackan TR. Longitudinal Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implant: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2022; 133:1014-1024. [PMID: 36004817 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine patterns of change and plateau in speech recognition scores in postlingually hearing impaired adult cochlear implant recipients. The study also examines variations in change patterns for different speech materials and testing conditions. STUDY DESIGN Used systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS Articles in English reporting speech recognition scores of adults with postlingual hearing loss at pre-implantation and at least two post-implantation time points were included. Statistically significant changes were determined by meta-analysis and the 95% confidence interval. RESULTS A total of 22 articles representing 1954 patients were included. Meta-analysis of mean difference demonstrated significant improvements in speech recognition score for words in quiet (37.4%; 95% confidence interval [34.7%, 40.7%]), sentences in quiet (49.4%; 95% confidence interval [44.9%, 53.9%]), and sentences in noise (30.8%; 95% confidence interval [25.2%, 36.4%]) from pre-op to 3 months. Scores continued to increase from 3 to 12 months but did not reach significance. Similarly, significant improvements from pre-op to 3 months were observed for consonant nucleus consonant (CNC) words in quiet (37.1%; 95% confidence interval [33.8%, 40.4%]), hearing in noise test (HINT) sentences in quiet (46.5%; 95% confidence interval [37.0%, 56.0%]), AzBio sentences in quiet (45.9%; 95% confidence interval [44.2%, 47.5%]), and AzBio sentences in noise (26.4%; 95% confidence interval [18.6%, 34.2%]). HINT sentences in noise demonstrated improvement from pre-op to 3 months (35.1%; 95% confidence interval [30.0%, 40.3%]) and from 3 to 12 months (15.5%; 95% confidence interval [7.2%, 23.8%]). CONCLUSIONS Mean speech recognition scores demonstrate significant improvement within the first 3 months, with no further statistically significant improvement after 3 months. However, large individual variation should be expected and future research is needed to explain the sources of these individual differences. Laryngoscope, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Ma
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Jacob Fried
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Elizabeth L Camposeo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Ted A Meyer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Judy R Dubno
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Theodore R McRackan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Effect of Serious Gaming on Speech-in-Noise Intelligibility in Adult Cochlear Implantees: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11102880. [PMID: 35629004 PMCID: PMC9145632 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Listening in noise remains challenging for adults with cochlear implants (CI) even after prolonged experience. Personalized auditory training (AT) programs can be proposed to improve specific auditory skills in adults with CI. The objective of this study was to assess serious gaming as a rehabilitation tool to improve speech-in-noise intelligibility in adult CI users. Thirty subjects with bilateral profound hearing loss and at least 9 months of CI experience were randomized to participate in a 5-week serious game-based AT program (n = 15) or a control group (n = 15). All participants were tested at enrolment and at 5 weeks using the sentence recognition-in-noise matrix test to measure the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) allowing 70% of speech-in-noise understanding (70% speech reception threshold, SRT70). Thirteen subjects completed the AT program and nine of them were re-tested 5 weeks later. The mean SRT70 improved from 15.5 dB to 11.5 dB SNR after 5 weeks of AT (p < 0.001). No significant change in SRT70 was observed in the control group. In the study group, the magnitude of SRT70 improvement was not correlated to the total number of AT hours. A large inter-patient variability was observed for speech-in-noise intelligibility measured once the AT program was completed and at re-test. The results suggest that serious game-based AT may improve speech-in-noise intelligibility in adult CI users. Potential sources of inter-patient variability are discussed. Serious gaming may be considered as a complementary training approach for improving CI outcomes in adults.
Collapse
|
21
|
Sladen DP, Zeitler DM. Speech perception abilities of adult cochlear implant listeners with single-sided deafness vs. bilateral hearing loss. Cochlear Implants Int 2022; 23:225-231. [PMID: 35506493 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2054098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare the speech perception abilities in adult cochlear implant recipients implanted for bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (BSNHL) with those implanted for single-sided deafness (SSD). DESIGN A total of 12 adults with BSNHL and 12 adults with SSD participated. Each participant completed a battery of speech perception measures including monosyllabic words, sentences, and consonant recognition. RESULTS Cochlear implant users with BSNHL performed higher on word and sentence recognition. Consonant recognition scores showed higher performance for CI listeners with BSNHL for voicing and manner, but not for place or articulation. CONCLUSIONS Results of this study suggest that adults with SSD may have lower speech perception abilities with their cochlear implant when compared to adults implanted for BSNHL.
Collapse
|
22
|
Dornhoffer JR, Reddy P, Ma C, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Dubno JR, McRackan TR. Use of Auditory Training and Its Influence on Early Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e165-e173. [PMID: 34772887 PMCID: PMC8752503 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assess associations between postcochlear implant (CI) auditory training and early outcomes related to speech recognition and CI quality of life (CIQOL). STUDY DESIGN Longitudinal, prospective cohort. SETTING Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS Seventy-two adults undergoing cochlear implantation for bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss. INTERVENTIONS Self-reported use of three categories of auditory training post-CI activation: (1) face-to-face training (e.g., speech pathologist), (2) passive home-based training (e.g., listening to audiobooks), and (3) computer-based training (e.g., interactive software). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Change in Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant phoneme (CNCp), CNC word (CNCw), AzBio sentences in quiet, and CIQOL-35 Profile global and domain scores from pre-CI to 3-month post-CI. RESULTS Of 72 patients, 52 (72.2%) used an auditory training resource. Of all patients, 18.4% used face-to-face training, 58.3% passive home-based training, and 33.3% computer-based training. At 3 months post-CI, use of any training was associated with greater improvement in speech recognition (d-range = 0.57-0.85) and global and domain-specific CIQOL scores, except entertainment (d-range = -0.33 to 0.77). Use of computer-based training demonstrated the greatest effect, with larger improvements in speech recognition (CNCp: d = 0.69[0.03,1.35]; CNCw: d = 0.80[0.14,1.46]; AzBio: d = 1.11[0.44,1.77]) and global and all domain-specific CIQOL scores (d-range = 0.05-1.35). Controlling for age, sex, household income, and use of multiple training resources, computer-based training remained the strongest positive predictor of speech recognition and CIQOL improvement, with significant associations with CNCp (ß = 33.07[1,43,64.719]), AzBio (ß = 33.03[5.71,60.35]), and CIQOL-global (ß = 10.92[1.15,20.70]) score improvement. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide preliminary evidence-based recommendations for use of specific auditory training resources for new adult CI recipients. Auditory training, especially self-directed computer software, resulted in improved speech recognition and CIQOL outcomes after 3 months and are widely available for CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Dornhoffer
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fitzpatrick EM, Carrier V, Turgeon G, Olmstead T, McAfee A, Whittingham J, Schramm D. Benefits of auditory-verbal intervention for adult cochlear implant users: perspectives of users and their coaches. Int J Audiol 2022; 61:993-1002. [PMID: 35015968 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1993361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Post-implant rehabilitation is limited for adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients. The objective of this research was to capture the perspectives of CI users and their coaches regarding their experiences with auditory-verbal intervention as an example of post-implant rehabilitation and their views on perceived benefits and challenges related to the intervention. DESIGN This qualitative study involved semi-structured focus group interviews with adult CI users and their coaches who accompanied them in a 24-week auditory-verbal intervention program. STUDY SAMPLE A total of 17 participants (eight CI users and nine coaches) contributed to the interviews. RESULTS Three key topic areas emerged from the interviews capturing CI users' and coaches' experiences related to the intervention program: (1) benefits of the intervention, (2) factors affecting experiences, and (3) challenges and barriers. Benefits included increased confidence in hearing, communication, social participation, and new knowledge about technology and hearing. Factors affecting the experience were participants' motivation and the therapist's skills. The primary challenge was the time commitment for weekly therapy. CONCLUSIONS Both CI users and coaches perceived a focussed auditory-verbal intervention to be beneficial in improving speech understanding, confidence in using hearing, social interaction, and knowledge about technology. Participants recommended reducing the intensity of intervention to facilitate participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Valérie Carrier
- Institut de réadaptation en déficience physique de Québec, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | | | - JoAnne Whittingham
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - David Schramm
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gfeller K, Veltman J, Mandara R, Napoli MB, Smith S, Choi Y, McCormick G, McKenzie T, Nastase A. Technological and Rehabilitative Concerns: Perspectives of Cochlear Implant Recipients Who Are Musicians. Trends Hear 2022; 26:23312165221122605. [PMID: 36203400 PMCID: PMC9549092 DOI: 10.1177/23312165221122605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
In these perspectives, we share the experiences of eight cochlear implant (CI) recipients who are musicians, and their efforts within and outside of audiological appointments to achieve satisfying music experiences. Their experiences were previously shared in a panel discussion as part of the 3rd Music and Cochlear Implant Symposium hosted at The University of Cambridge, United Kingdom. Following the symposium, the panel members and moderator developed and completed a follow-up questionnaire to facilitate a formal analysis of the following questions: (a) What forms of support for optimizing music exist within clinical CI appointments, including counseling, mapping, assessment, and rehabilitation? (b) What forms of support do CI users who are interested in music desire? (c) What self-initiated approaches can be used to improve music perception, enjoyment, and participation? Using qualitative methodology, the questionnaire data were coded, aggregated into themes, and then into core categories. The primary themes that emerged from the data were (a) limited levels of support for optimizing music outcomes within normal clinical appointments, (b) difficulties in current mapping and assessment in relation to music perception, and (c) limited availability of clinically sponsored training/rehabilitation for music. These CI recipients then recommended clinical protocol changes and described self-initiated rehabilitation. These findings were examined in relation to literature on clinical practices for CI users, auditory rehabilitation, and patient-centered care, emphasizing best practices and barriers to audiological care. The data as related to healthcare trends were conceptualized and developed into a proposed Reciprocal Model for Music Rehabilitation (RMMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Gfeller
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Joke Veltman
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sarah Smith
- Auditory Implant Service, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Yoon Choi
- Independent Scholars, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Gaelen McCormick
- Eastman School of Music, University of
Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ray C, Taylor E, Vasil KJ, Zombek L, Baxter JH, Moberly AC. The Value of Speech-Language Pathologists in Auditory Rehabilitation for Adults With Cochlear Implants. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2021; 30:1909-1911. [PMID: 34043441 DOI: 10.1044/2021_ajslp-20-00189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Background Standards for auditory rehabilitation are currently lacking for adults who receive cochlear implants. Speech recognition outcomes are highly variable, and many adults with cochlear implants present with suboptimal performance. Functional real-life communication abilities are not routinely measured clinically and are not strongly linked to performance on traditional measures of speech recognition. In fact, even individuals with relatively good speech recognition outcomes often present with persistent communication difficulties. In contrast to pediatric cochlear implant users, speech-language pathologists are not routinely involved in the rehabilitation of adults who receive cochlear implants. Purpose The purpose of this article is to describe the value of including a speech-language pathologist in a comprehensive approach to auditory rehabilitation for adults with cochlear implants. Method The theoretical and clinical foundations of incorporating a speech-language pathologist into an adult auditory rehabilitation program are discussed. A description of the skills and potential roles of the speech-language pathologist for providing adult cochlear implant rehabilitation services is presented, along with potential barriers to implementation. Conclusion Person-centered management of postlingually deafened adults with cochlear implants can be augmented by a more complete approach utilizing the skill set of a speech-language pathologist. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14669652.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christin Ray
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Erin Taylor
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - Kara J Vasil
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | | | - Jodi H Baxter
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Aaron C Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bernstein CM, Brewer DM, Bakke MH, Olson AD, Machmer EJ, Spitzer JB, Schauer PC, Sydlowski SA, Levitt H. Maximizing Cochlear Implant Outcomes with Short-Term Aural Rehabilitation. J Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32:144-156. [PMID: 33890268 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of adults are receiving cochlear implants (CIs) and many achieve high levels of speech perception and improved quality of life. However, a proportion of implant recipients still struggle due to limited speech recognition and/or greater communication demands in their daily lives. For these individuals a program of aural rehabilitation (AR) has the potential to improve outcomes. PURPOSE The study investigated the effects of a short-term AR intervention on speech recognition, functional communication, and psychosocial outcomes in post lingually deafened adult CI users. RESEARCH DESIGN The experimental design was a multisite clinical study with participants randomized to either an AR treatment or active control group. Each group completed 6 weekly 90-minute individual treatment sessions. Assessments were completed pretreatment, 1 week and 2 months post-treatment. STUDY SAMPLE Twenty-five post lingually deafened adult CI recipients participated. AR group: mean age 66.2 (48-80); nine females, four males; months postactivation 7.7 (3-16); mean years severe to profound deafness 18.4 (2-40). Active control group: mean age 62.8 (47-85); eight females, four males; months postactivation 7.0 (3-13); mean years severe to profound deafness 18.8 (1-55). INTERVENTION The AR protocol consisted of auditory training (words, sentences, speech tracking), and psychosocial counseling (informational and communication strategies). Active control group participants engaged in cognitive stimulation activities (e.g., crosswords, sudoku, etc.). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Repeated measures ANOVA or analysis of variance, MANOVA or multivariate analysis of variance, and planned contrasts were used to compare group performance on the following measures: CasperSent; Hearing Handicap Inventory; Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire; Client Oriented Scale of Improvement; Glasgow Benefit Inventory. RESULTS The AR group showed statistically significant improvements on speech recognition performance, psychosocial function, and communication goals with no significant improvement seen in the control group. The two groups were statistically equivalent on all outcome measures at preassessment. The robust improvements for the AR group were maintained at 2 months post-treatment. CONCLUSION Results of this clinical study provide evidence that a short-term AR intervention protocol can maximize outcomes for adult post lingually deafened CI users. The impact of this brief multidimensional AR intervention to extend CI benefit is compelling, and may serve as a template for best practices with adult CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Marcus Bernstein
- Department of Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences, Gallaudet University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Diane Majerus Brewer
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Matthew H Bakke
- Department of Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences, Gallaudet University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Anne D Olson
- Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Kentucky College of Health Sciences, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Elizabeth Jackson Machmer
- National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Center for Educational Research Partnerships, Rochester, New York
| | - Jaclyn B Spitzer
- Columbia University Medical Center, Audiology and Speech Pathology in Otolaryngology, New York, New York.,Montclair State University, Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bloomfield, New Jersey
| | - Paula C Schauer
- Prince Georges County School System, Instructional Specialist Audiology, Landover, Maryland
| | | | - Harry Levitt
- Advanced Hearing Concepts, Bodega Bay, California
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assess relationships between patient, hearing, and cochlear implant (CI)-related factors and second-side CI speech recognition outcomes in adults who are bilaterally implanted. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained CI database. SETTING Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS One hundred two adults receiving bilateral sequential or simultaneous CIs. OUTCOME MEASURES Postimplantation consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word and AzBio sentence scores at ≥12 months. RESULTS Of patient, hearing and CI-specific, factors examined only postimplantation speech recognition scores of the first CI were independently associated with speech recognition performance of the second CI on multivariable regression analysis (CNC: ß = 0.471[0.298, 0.644]; AzBio: ß = 0.602[0.417, 0.769]). First-side postoperative CNC scores explained 24.3% of variation in second CI postoperative CNC scores, while change in first CI AzBio scores explained 40.3% of variation in second CI AzBio scores. Based on established 95% confidence intervals, 75.2% (CNC) and 65.9% (AzBio) of patients score equivalent or better with their second CI compared to first CI performance. Age at implantation, duration of hearing loss, receiving simultaneous versus sequential CIs, and preoperative residual hearing (measured by pure-tone average and aided speech recognition scores) were not associated with 12 month speech recognition scores at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS The degree of improvement in speech recognition from first CI may predict speech recognition with a second CI. This provides preliminary evidence-based expectations for patients considering a second CI. Counseling should be guarded given the remaining unexplained variability in outcomes. Nonetheless, these data may assist decision making when considering a second CI versus continued use of a hearing aid for an unimplanted ear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
|
28
|
Völter C, Stöckmann C, Schirmer C, Dazert S. Tablet-Based Telerehabilitation Versus Conventional Face-to-Face Rehabilitation After Cochlear Implantation: Prospective Intervention Pilot Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2021; 8:e20405. [PMID: 33709934 PMCID: PMC8082947 DOI: 10.2196/20405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Technologies allowing home-based rehabilitation may be a key means of saving financial resources while also facilitating people’s access to treatment. After cochlear implantation, auditory training is necessary for the brain to adapt to new auditory signals transmitted by the cochlear implant (CI). To date, auditory training is conducted in a face-to-face setting at a specialized center. However, because of the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on health care, the need for new therapeutic settings has intensified. Objective The aims of this study are to assess the feasibility of a novel teletherapeutic auditory rehabilitation platform in adult CI recipients and compare the clinical outcomes and economic benefits of this platform with those derived from conventional face-to-face rehabilitation settings in a clinic. Methods In total, 20 experienced adult CI users with a mean age of 59.4 (SD 16.3) years participated in the study. They completed 3 weeks of standard (face-to-face) therapy, followed by 3 weeks of computer-based auditory training (CBAT) at home. Participants were assessed at three intervals: before face-to-face therapy, after face-to-face therapy, and after CBAT. The primary outcomes were speech understanding in quiet and noisy conditions. The secondary outcomes were the usability of the CBAT system, the participants’ subjective rating of their own listening abilities, and the time required for completing face-to-face and CBAT sessions for CI users and therapists. Results Greater benefits were observed after CBAT than after standard therapy in nearly all speech outcome measures. Significant improvements were found in sentence comprehension in noise (P=.004), speech tracking (P=.004) and phoneme differentiation (vowels: P=.001; consonants: P=.02) after CBAT. Only speech tracking improved significantly after conventional therapy (P=.007). The program’s usability was judged to be high: only 2 of 20 participants could not imagine using the program without support. The different features of the training platform were rated as high. Cost analysis showed a cost difference in favor of CBAT: therapists spent 120 minutes per week face-to-face and 30 minutes per week on computer-based sessions. For CI users, attending standard therapy required an average of approximately 78 (SD 58.6) minutes of travel time per appointment. Conclusions The proposed teletherapeutic approach for hearing rehabilitation enables good clinical outcomes while saving time for CI users and clinicians. The promising speech understanding results might be due to the high satisfaction of users with the CBAT program. Teletherapy might offer a cost-effective solution to address the lack of human resources in health care as well as the global challenge of current or future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Völter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr University Bochum, St Elisabeth Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| | - Carolin Stöckmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr University Bochum, St Elisabeth Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christiane Schirmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr University Bochum, St Elisabeth Hospital, Bochum, Germany.,Kampmann Hearing Aid Acoustics, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr University Bochum, St Elisabeth Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
James CJ, Graham PL, Betances Reinoso FA, Breuning SN, Durko M, Huarte Irujo A, Royo López J, Müller L, Perenyi A, Jaramillo Saffon R, Salinas Garcia S, Schüssler M, Schwarz Langer MJ, Skarzynski PH, Mecklenburg DJ. The Listening Network and Cochlear Implant Benefits in Hearing-Impaired Adults. Front Aging Neurosci 2021; 13:589296. [PMID: 33716706 PMCID: PMC7947658 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.589296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Older adults with mild or no hearing loss make more errors and expend more effort listening to speech. Cochlear implants (CI) restore hearing to deaf patients but with limited fidelity. We hypothesized that patient-reported hearing and health-related quality of life in CI patients may similarly vary according to age. Speech Spatial Qualities (SSQ) of hearing scale and Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI) questionnaires were administered to 543 unilaterally implanted adults across Europe, South Africa, and South America. Data were acquired before surgery and at 1, 2, and 3 years post-surgery. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models with visit, age group (18–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, and 65+), and side of implant as main factors and adjusted for other covariates. Tinnitus and dizziness prevalence did not vary with age, but older groups had more preoperative hearing. Preoperatively and postoperatively, SSQ scores were significantly higher (Δ0.75–0.82) for those aged <45 compared with those 55+. However, gains in SSQ scores were equivalent across age groups, although postoperative SSQ scores were higher in right-ear implanted subjects. All age groups benefited equally in terms of HUI gain (0.18), with no decrease in scores with age. Overall, younger adults appeared to cope better with a degraded hearing before and after CI, leading to better subjective hearing performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petra L Graham
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Marcin Durko
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Alicia Huarte Irujo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Juan Royo López
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Lida Müller
- Tygerberg Hospital-Stellenbosch University Cochlear Implant Unit, Tygerberg, South Africa
| | - Adam Perenyi
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, Albert Szent Györgyi Medical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Sandra Salinas Garcia
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mark Schüssler
- Deutsches HörZentrum Hannover der HNO-Klinik, Medizische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Völter C, Schirmer C, Hinsen D, Roeber M, Dazert S, Bilda K. Therapist-Guided Telerehabilitation for Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Developmental and Feasibility Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2020; 7:e15843. [PMID: 32255434 PMCID: PMC7290457 DOI: 10.2196/15843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cochlear implants can provide auditory perception to many people with hearing impairment who derive insufficient benefits from hearing aid use. For optimal speech perception with a cochlear implant, postoperative auditory training is necessary to adapt the brain to the new sound transmitted by the implant. Currently, this training is usually conducted via face-to-face sessions in rehabilitation centers. With the aging of society, the prevalence of age-related hearing loss and the number of adults with cochlear implants are expected to increase. Therefore, augmenting face-to-face rehabilitation with alternative forms of auditory training may be highly valuable. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this multidisciplinary study was to evaluate the newly developed internet-based teletherapeutic multimodal system Train2hear, which enables adult cochlear implant users to perform well-structured and therapist-guided hearing rehabilitation sessions on their own. METHODS The study was conducted in 3 phases: (1) we searched databases from January 2005 to October 2018 for auditory training programs suitable for adult cochlear implant users; (2) we developed a prototype of Train2hear based on speech and language development theories; (3) 18 cochlear implant users (mean age 61, SD 15.4 years) and 10 speech and language therapists (mean age 34, SD 10.9 years) assessed the usability and the feasibility of the prototype. This was achieved via questionnaires, including the System Usability Scale (SUS) and a short version of the intrinsic motivation inventory (KIM) questionnaires. RESULTS The key components of the Train2hear training program are an initial analysis according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; a range of different hierarchically based exercises; and an automatic and dynamic adaptation of the different tasks according to the cochlear implant user's progress. In addition to motivational mechanisms (such as supportive feedback), the cochlear implant user and therapist receive feedback in the form of comprehensive statistical analysis. In general, cochlear implant users enjoyed their training as assessed by KIM scores (mean 19, SD 2.9, maximum 21). In terms of usability (scale 0-100), the majority of users rated the Train2hear program as excellent (mean 88, SD 10.5). Age (P=.007) and sex (P=.01) had a significant impact on the SUS score with regard to usability of the program. The therapists (SUS score mean 93, SD 9.2) provided slightly more positive feedback than the cochlear implant users (mean 85, SD 10.3). CONCLUSIONS Based on this first evaluation, Train2hear was well accepted by both cochlear implant users and therapists. Computer-based auditory training might be a promising cost-effective option that can provide a highly personalized rehabilitation program suited to individual cochlear implant user characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Völter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christiane Schirmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.,Kampmann Hearing Aid Acoustics, Bochum, Germany
| | - Dorothee Hinsen
- Hochschule für Gesundheit, University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Germany
| | - Marieke Roeber
- Hochschule für Gesundheit, University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Kerstin Bilda
- Hochschule für Gesundheit, University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Carlson
- From the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and the Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Calvino M, Sánchez-Cuadrado I, Gavilán J, Lassaletta L. Does bimodal hearing increase self-assessed abilities and hearing outcomes when compared to unilateral cochlear implantation? Int J Audiol 2020; 59:654-660. [PMID: 32174222 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1735653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare the applicability and benefit of providing unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users with a contralateral hearing aid (HA).Design: This retrospective (case-control) study was conducted in a hospital-based CI centre. Participants self-assessed their hearing via two questionnaires (SSQ12 and HISQUI19). Objective postoperative speech perception was assessed via aided thresholds and speech perception tests (monosyllabic words, disyllabic words, and sentences) in quiet and noise.Study sample: A CI-only group (n = 113, mean age 55.1 ± 14.2 years) and a bimodal group (n = 50, mean age 56.7 ± 15.2) participated in the study.Results: No significant difference in SSQ12 or HISQUI19 scores was observed between groups. The bimodal group had a significantly better aided hearing level (p = 0.020) and speech discrimination score (p = 0.019).Conclusions: Bimodal (CI + HA) users have significantly better speech understanding than unilateral CI-only users, although this benefit may not be reflected in self-assessed outcomes. Counselling about bimodal hearing must cover expectations about potential benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miryam Calvino
- Department of Otolaryngology, "La Paz" University Hospital. IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.,Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, (CIBERER-U761), Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado
- Department of Otolaryngology, "La Paz" University Hospital. IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Gavilán
- Department of Otolaryngology, "La Paz" University Hospital. IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Department of Otolaryngology, "La Paz" University Hospital. IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.,Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, (CIBERER-U761), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gfeller K, Driscoll V, Schwalje A. Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients' Perspectives on Experiences With Music in Everyday Life: A Multifaceted and Dynamic Phenomenon. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:1229. [PMID: 31824240 PMCID: PMC6882382 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cochlear implants (CIs), which have been designed primarily to support spoken communication of persons with severe to profound hearing loss, are highly effective in supporting speech perception in quiet listening conditions. CI users as a group achieve significantly poorer perception and appraisal of music, and speech perception is compromised when background music is present, though outcomes vary considerably across recipients. A number of factors have been identified that contribute to variable music listening experiences, but many questions remain, particularly regarding experiences in everyday life from the perspective of CI users. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was twofold: The first aim was to explore the perspectives of adult CI recipients regarding two experiences with music in everyday life: purposeful music listening and background music that competes with spoken conversation. The second aim was to develop a framework of everyday music experiences based upon CI perspectives that could inform future rehabilitative practices and research initiatives. METHODS Qualitative and patient-engaged research methodologies were used to emphasize the perspectives of the CI users. Participants included 40 experienced adult CI users ranging in age from 19 to 81 enrolled in 13 CI centers. Participants completed on-line semi-structured open-ended questionnaires regarding purposeful music listening and background music in conjunction with spoken communication. Responses were analyzed using an iterative inductive coding process consistent with grounded theory methodology. The interrelated themes that emerged from the data were then organized into a model synthesizing components from models on music response and self-management for persons with chronic health conditions. OUTCOMES Data analyses informed the development of a Dynamic Problem Solving Model for Management of Music Listening Environments adapted from Hill-Briggs (2003) Problem Solving Model of Chronic Illness Self-Management. Key findings were: (1) Music listening is a dynamic, multifaceted experience; satisfactory listening depended upon optimal combinations of factors; (2) Music listening is effortful, but the extent of satisfaction is influenced by expectations and self-management of the situation; (3) CI users have limited access to resources for optimizing music experiences. Many CI users would consider rehabilitation, but level of commitment and priorities differ across CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Gfeller
- School of Music, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States,Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States,Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States,*Correspondence: Kate Gfeller,
| | - Virginia Driscoll
- School of Music, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States,Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Adam Schwalje
- Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tolisano AM, Schauwecker N, Baumgart B, Whitson J, Kutz JW, Isaacson B, Hunter JB. Identifying Disadvantaged Groups for Cochlear Implantation: Demographics from a Large Cochlear Implant Program. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2019; 129:347-354. [DOI: 10.1177/0003489419888232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To identify demographic predictors of patients undergoing cochlear implantation evaluation and surgery. Methods: Consecutive adult patients between 2009 and 2018 who underwent cochlear implantation evaluation at a university cochlear implantation program were retrospectively identified to determine (1) cochlear implantation qualification rate and (2) pursuit of surgery rate with respect to age, gender, race, primary spoken language, marital status, insurance type, and distance to the cochlear implantation center. Results: A total of 823 cochlear implantation evaluations were analyzed. Overall, 76.3% of patients qualified for cochlear implantation and 61.5% of these patients pursued surgery. Age was the only independent predictor for cochlear implantation qualification, such that, for each year younger, the odds of qualifying for cochlear implantation increased by 2.5% (OR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99). Age, race, marital status, and insurance type were each independent predictors of the decision to pursue surgery. The odds of pursuing surgery increased by 2.8% for each year younger (OR 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.05). Compared to White patients, non-Whites were half as likely to pursue surgery (OR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.25-0.88). Single (OR 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26-0.94) and widowed patients (OR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.95) were about half as likely to pursue surgery as compared to married patients. Patients with military insurance were 13 times more likely to pursue surgery as compared to patients with Medicare (OR 13.0; 95% CI: 1.67-101.4). Conclusion: Younger age is an independent predictor for a higher cochlear implantation qualification rate, suggesting the possibility for delayed candidacy referral. Rate of surgical pursuit in qualified cochlear implantation candidates is lower for racial minorities, single and widowed patients, and older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony M. Tolisano
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Bethany Baumgart
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Johanna Whitson
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Joe Walter Kutz
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Brandon Isaacson
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jacob B. Hunter
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mattingly JK, Castellanos I, Moberly AC. Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants. Otol Neurotol 2019; 39:e956-e963. [PMID: 30444843 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS Significant variability in speech recognition persists among postlingually deafened adults with cochlear implants (CIs). We hypothesize that scores of nonverbal reasoning predict sentence recognition in adult CI users. BACKGROUND Cognitive functions contribute to speech recognition outcomes in adults with hearing loss. These functions may be particularly important for CI users who must interpret highly degraded speech signals through their devices. This study used a visual measure of reasoning (the ability to solve novel problems), the Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM), to predict sentence recognition in CI users. METHODS Participants were 39 postlingually deafened adults with CIs and 43 age-matched normal-hearing (NH) controls. CI users were assessed for recognition of words in sentences in quiet, and NH controls listened to eight-channel vocoded versions to simulate the degraded signal delivered by a CI. A computerized visual task of the RPM, requiring participants to identify the correct missing piece in a 3×3 matrix of geometric designs, was also performed. Particular items from the RPM were examined for their associations with sentence recognition abilities, and a subset of items on the RPM was tested for the ability to predict degraded sentence recognition in the NH controls. RESULTS The overall number of items answered correctly on the 48-item RPM significantly correlated with sentence recognition in CI users (r = 0.35-0.47) and NH controls (r = 0.36-0.57). An abbreviated 12-item version of the RPM was created and performance also correlated with sentence recognition in CI users (r = 0.40-0.48) and NH controls (r = 0.49-0.56). CONCLUSIONS Nonverbal reasoning skills correlated with sentence recognition in both CI and NH subjects. Our findings provide further converging evidence that cognitive factors contribute to speech processing by adult CI users and can help explain variability in outcomes. Our abbreviated version of the RPM may serve as a clinically meaningful assessment for predicting sentence recognition outcomes in CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jameson K Mattingly
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Távora-Vieira D, Marino R. Re-training the deaf ear: Auditory training for adult cochlear implant users with singlesided deafness. Cochlear Implants Int 2019; 20:231-236. [DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2019.1603652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dayse Távora-Vieira
- School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Fliona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Roberta Marino
- School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Fliona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Moberly AC, Vasil K, Baxter J, Ray C. What to Do When Cochlear Implant Users Plateau in Performance: a Pilot Study of Clinician-guided Aural Rehabilitation. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39:e794-e802. [PMID: 30199497 PMCID: PMC6132264 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS For experienced adult cochlear implant (CI) users who have reached a plateau in performance, a clinician-guided aural rehabilitation (CGAR) approach can improve speech recognition and hearing-related quality of life (QOL). BACKGROUND A substantial number of CI users do not reach optimal performance in terms of speech recognition ability and/or personal communication goals. Although self-guided computerized auditory training programs have grown in popularity, compliance and efficacy for these programs are poor. We propose that CGAR can improve speech recognition and hearing-related QOL in experienced CI users. METHODS Twelve adult CI users were enrolled in an 8-week CGAR program guided by a speech-language pathologist and audiologist. Nine patients completed the program along with pre-AR and immediate post-AR testing of speech recognition (AzBio sentences in quiet and in multitalker babble, Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant words in quiet), QOL (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults/Elderly, and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale), and neurocognitive functioning (working memory capacity, information-processing speed, inhibitory control, speed of lexical/phonological access, and nonverbal reasoning). Pilot data for these nine patients are presented. RESULTS From pre-CGAR to post-CGAR, group mean improvements in word recognition were found. Improvements were also demonstrated on some composite and subscale measures of QOL. Patients who demonstrated improvements in word recognition were those who performed most poorly at baseline. CONCLUSIONS CGAR represents a potentially efficacious approach to improving speech recognition and QOL for experienced CI users. Limitations and considerations in implementing and studying aural rehabilitation approaches are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron C. Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Kara Vasil
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Jodi Baxter
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Christin Ray
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wallhäusser-Franke E, Balkenhol T, Hetjens S, Rotter N, Servais JJ. Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing Status. Front Neurol 2018; 9:753. [PMID: 30250450 PMCID: PMC6139334 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Patient-reported outcomes gain importance for the assessment of auditory abilities in cochlear implant users and for the evaluation of auditory rehabilitation. Aims of the study were to explore the interrelation of self-reported improvements in auditory ability with improvements in speech comprehension and to identify factors other than audiological improvement that affect self-reported auditory ability. Study Design: Explorative prospective analysis using a within-subjects repeated measures design. Setting: Academic tertiary care center. Participants: Twenty-seven adult participants with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who received a HiRes 90K CI and continued use of a HA at the non-implanted ear (bimodal hearing). Intervention: Cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported auditory ability/disability assessed by the comparative version of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ-B), and monosyllable as well as sentence comprehension in quiet and within speech modulated noise from different directions assessed pre- as well as 3 and 6 months post-implantation. Results: Data of 17 individuals were analyzed. At the endpoint of the study, improvement of self-reported auditory ability was significant. Regarding audiometric measures, significant improvement was seen for CI-aided pure tone thresholds, for monaural CI-assisted and bimodal sentence comprehension in quiet and in speech-modulated noise that was presented from the same source or at the side of the HA-ear. Correlations between self-reported and audiometric improvements remained weak, with the exception of the improvement seen for monaural CI-aided sentence comprehension in quiet and self-perceived improvement of sound quality. Considerable correlations existed between self-reported improvements and current level of depression and anxiety, and with general self-efficaciousness. Regression analyses substantiated a positive influence of self-efficaciousness on self-reported improvement in speech comprehension and between the improvement of monaural CI-aided sentence comprehension in quiet and perceived sound quality as well as a negative influence of anxiety on self-reported improvement in spatial hearing. Self-reported improvements were significantly better in the subgroup with intensive as compared to regular rehabilitation. Conclusions: Self-reported auditory ability/disability represents an important measure for the success of bimodal CI-provision. It is influenced by personal and mental health factors that may improve CI-rehabilitation results if addressed during rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Tobias Balkenhol
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Svetlana Hetjens
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nicole Rotter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jerome J Servais
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Considerable unexplained variability and large individual differences exist in speech recognition outcomes for postlingually deaf adults who use cochlear implants (CIs), and a sizeable fraction of CI users can be considered "poor performers." This article summarizes our current knowledge of poor CI performance, and provides suggestions to clinicians managing these patients. METHOD Studies are reviewed pertaining to speech recognition variability in adults with hearing loss. Findings are augmented by recent studies in our laboratories examining outcomes in postlingually deaf adults with CIs. RESULTS In addition to conventional clinical predictors of CI performance (e.g., amount of residual hearing, duration of deafness), factors pertaining to both "bottom-up" auditory sensitivity to the spectro-temporal details of speech, and "top-down" linguistic knowledge and neurocognitive functions contribute to CI outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The broad array of factors that contribute to speech recognition performance in adult CI users suggests the potential both for novel diagnostic assessment batteries to explain poor performance, and also new rehabilitation strategies for patients who exhibit poor outcomes. Moreover, this broad array of factors determining outcome performance suggests the need to treat individual CI patients using a personalized rehabilitation approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron C. Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Chelsea Bates
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Michael S. Harris
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - David B. Pisoni
- Psychological and Brain Sciences Department, Indiana University
| |
Collapse
|