Use of rifabutin for the treatment of a latent tuberculosis infection in a patient after solid organ transplantation

Tuberculosis in kidney transplant candidates and recipients

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of infectious mortality and morbidity in the world, second only to coronavirus disease 2019. Patients with chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant recipients are at a higher risk of developing TB than the general population. Active TB is difficult to diagnose in this population due to close mimics. All transplant candidates should be screened for latent TB infection and given TB prophylaxis. Patients who develop active TB pre- or post-transplantation should receive multidrug combination therapy of antitubercular therapy for the recommended duration with optimal dose modification as per glomerular filtration rate.

A long-acting formulation of rifabutin is effective for prevention and treatment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) is a communicable disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Successful treatment requires strict adherence to drug regimens for prolonged periods of time. Long-acting (LA) delivery systems have the potential to improve adherence. Here, we show the development of LA injectable drug formulations of the anti-TB drug rifabutin made of biodegradable polymers and biocompatible solvents that solidifies after subcutaneous injection. Addition of amphiphilic compounds increases drug solubility, allowing to significantly increase formulation drug load. Solidified implants have organized microstructures that change with formulation composition. Higher drug load results in smaller pore size that alters implant erosion and allows sustained drug release. The translational relevance of these observations in BALB/c mice is demonstrated by (1) delivering high plasma drug concentrations for 16 weeks, (2) preventing acquisition of Mtb infection, and (3) clearing acute Mtb infection from the lung and other tissues.

Drug-level change and optimal dose adjustment of tacrolimus with the use of rifabutin for treating mycobacterial disease in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the change in drug level and the need for dose adjustment of calcineurin inhibitor when it is used with rifabutin in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We aimed to analyze whether the drug level of tacrolimus significantly reduced after the use of rifabutin and to assess optimal adjustment of tacrolimus dose in SOT recipients.

METHODS

Of the SOT recipients in a tertiary referral center in South Korea in 2000-2019, 50 patients who maintained an unchanged dose of tacrolimus after the use of rifabutin for treating mycobacterial disease were enrolled. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 53.9 ± 11.5 years. The most commonly transplanted organ was the liver (66.0%). The most common indication of rifabutin use was for treating active tuberculosis (78.0%). After rifabutin initiation, the trough level of tacrolimus decreased significantly to the subtherapeutic range in 38 (76.0%) patients. The drug levels of these 38 patients dropped from 7.2 to 3.8 ng/mL (p < 0.001) after rifabutin treatment. In these patients, the median 1.5-fold increase in the tacrolimus dose was required to restore the drug level to the within-therapeutic range.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that careful tacrolimus drug-level monitoring and dose adjustment are necessary for most SOT recipients when rifabutin is administered for the treatment of mycobacterial disease. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Pharmacologic management of Mycobacterium chimaera Infections: A Primer for Clinicians

Mycobacterium chimaera, a member of the Mycobacterium avium complex, can cause infections in individuals after open heart surgery due to contaminated heater-cooler units. The diagnosis can be challenging, as the incubation period can be quite variable, and symptoms are nonspecific. In addition to aggressive surgical management, combination pharmacologic therapy is the cornerstone of therapy, which should consist of a macrolide, a rifamycin, ethambutol, and amikacin. Multiple second-line agents may be utilized in the setting of intolerances or toxicities. In vitro susceptibility of these agents is similar to activity against other species in the Mycobacterium avium complex. Drug–drug interactions are frequently encountered, as many individuals have chronic medical comorbidities and are prescribed medications that interact with the first-line agents used to treat M. chimaera. Recognition of these drug–drug interactions and appropriate management are essential for optimizing treatment outcomes.

Predictors of tacrolimus pharmacokinetic variability: current evidences and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

In kidney transplantation, tacrolimus (TAC) is at the cornerstone of current immunosuppressive strategies. Though because of its narrow therapeutic index, it is critical to ensure that TAC levels are maintained within this sharp window through reactive adjustments. This would allow maximizing efficiency while limiting drug-associated toxicity. However, TAC high intra- and inter-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability makes it more laborious to accurately predict the appropriate dosage required for a given patient.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the state-of-the-art knowledge regarding drug interactions, demographic and pharmacogenetics factors as predictors of TAC PK. We provide a scoring index for each association to grade its relevance and we present practical recommendations, when possible for clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

The management of TAC concentration in transplanted kidney patients is as critical as it is challenging. Recommendations based on rigorous scientific evidences are lacking as knowledge of potential predictors remains limited outside of DDIs. Awareness of these limitations should pave the way for studies looking at demographic and pharmacogenetic factors as well as gut microbiota composition in order to promote tailored treatment plans. Therapeutic approaches considering patients' clinical singularities may help allowing to maintain appropriate concentration of TAC.

Comparative analysis of the drug-drug interaction between immunosuppressants, safety and efficacy of rifabutin from rifampicin-based Anti-TB treatment in living donor liver transplant recipients with active tuberculosis

Background

The Interaction between anti-tuberculous and immunosuppressive drugs which may increase the risk of graft rejections is a major challenge in managing transplant recipients with tuberculosis (TB). Instead of rifampicin (RFM), most guidelines recommended the use of rifabutin (RFB) because of its reduced capacity to induce immunosuppressant metabolism while maintaining the same efficacy as RFM against TB. However, there has been no available data directly comparing the outcome of RFB from RFM-based anti-TB regimens in liver transplant patients with TB. This study aimed to compare the effects of RFB from RFM-based treatment in terms of the drug interaction with immunosuppressants, as well as the safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes of living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients with active TB.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on all adult LDLT recipients diagnosed with active TB from June 1994 to May 2016 that had concurrently and continuously received either RFB or RFM-based treatment and immunosuppressants.

Results

Twenty-two patients were included. Twelve (55%) patients were in the RFM group. Ten (45%) patients were in the RFB group. RFB group showed a lesser rate of immunosuppressant trough level reduction (20% vs 50%, p = 0.009) during TB treatment. There was no TB recurrence and no significant change in platelet or leukocyte count in either group. Acute cellular rejection (ACR), rate of TB-treatment completion and overall survival, rates were excellent and statistically similar in both groups.

Conclusion

The use of RFB in LDLT recipients with active TB, had a lesser drug interaction than when RFM was used. However, RFB did not significantly reduced the rate of ACR. RFB and RFM are both effective and safe to use in LDLT recipients with active TB.

Global access of rifabutin for the treatment of tuberculosis - why should we prioritize this?

INTRODUCTION

Rifabutin, a rifamycin of equivalent potency to rifampicin, has several advantages in its pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile, particularly in HIV co-infected patients on combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). In this commentary, we evaluate evidence supporting increased global use of rifabutin and highlight key recommendations for action.

DISCUSSION

Although extrapolation of data from HIV uninfected patients would suggest non-inferiority, there has been no randomized controlled study comparing rifabutin versus rifampicin in the outcomes of relapse-free cure, in drug susceptible tuberculosis (TB), in HIV co-infected patients on currently utilized cART regimens or in paediatric populations. An important advantage of rifabutin is that compared to the dose adjustments required with rifampicin, it can be co-administered with the integrase strand transfer inhibitors raltegravir or dolutegravir without the need for dose adjustments. This strategy would be easier to implement in a programmatic setting and would save costs. We have assessed cost incentives to utilize rifabutin and have estimated generic costs for a range of rifabutin dosage scenarios. Where facilities are present for drug re-challenge and monitoring for drug toxicity and cross-reactivity, rifabutin offers a switch alternative for adverse drug reactions (ADR)s attributed to rifampicin. This would negate the need to prolong treatment in the absence of a rifamycin as part of short-course multidrug therapy. There is evidence of incomplete cross-resistance to rifampicin and rifabutin. Rifabutin may be useful in rifampicin-resistant TB, in an estimated 20% of cases, based on phenotypic or genotypic rifabutin susceptibility testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Rifabutin should be available globally as a first-line rifamycin in HIV co-infected individuals and as a switch option in cases of rifampicin associated ADRs. Further studies are needed to ascertain the utility of rifabutin in rifampicin-resistant rifabutin-susceptible TB.

Interactions between anti-infective agents and immunosuppressants-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation provide an update on potential drug-drug interactions between anti-infectives and immunosuppressants, which are most notable with calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors. Drug-drug interactions may occur through pharmacokinetic mechanisms leading to altered drug concentrations of either the anti-infective or immunosuppressive drug, or by pharmacodynamic interactions increasing or decreasing the efficacy or toxicity of the medications. Many of the significant pharmacokinetic interactions occur through inhibition or induction of the cytochrome 3A4 system by anti-infective agents leading to increased or decreased immunosuppressive agent levels, respectively. The membrane transporter P-glycoprotein is also often involved in drug interactions. Since the last iteration of these guidelines, multiple new hepatitis C virus direct-acting antivirals have become available for use in SOT recipients. Of these agents, some are substrates of cytochrome and drug transporter systems, while others inhibit these systems and may affect immunosuppressive agents. Due to the high risk for drug-drug interactions in the solid organ transplant population, practitioners must be aware of potential interactions and be vigilant in monitoring and adjusting drug dosing when appropriate.

Prevention and Management of Tuberculosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients are at an increased risk of tuberculosis and transplant candidates should be screened early in their evaluation with a detailed history, tuberculin skin test or tuberculosis interferon-gamma release assay, and chest radiograph. For latent tuberculosis treatment, isoniazid and rifamycin-based regimens have advantages and disadvantages; treatment decisions should be customized. Tuberculosis after solid organ transplantation generally occurs after months or years; early infections should raise the possibility of donor-derived infections. Tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment in solid organ transplant recipients may be complicated by protean manifestations, drug interactions, and adverse drug reactions.

Treatment of tuberculosis infection complicated with liver transplant

Liver transplant is considered the best choice for treating various end-stage liver diseases either at home or abroad. Among patients of liver transplant complicated with tuberculosis (TB), the incidence and mortality of postoperative active TB are bound to increase remarkably. Diagnosing and treating TB in patients with end-stage liver diseases who received immunosuppressants after liver transplant are difficult because of the absence of specific clinical manifestations while being complicated with TB, reduced sensitivity to cellular immunoassay, and interaction between anti-TB drugs and immunosuppressants. Therefore, the screening of high-risk groups, improvement in diagnostic accuracy, preoperative treatment, and reduced interaction between anti-TB drugs and immunosuppressants can help optimize diagnosis and treatment regimes and thus further improve the prognosis of patients.

Rifabutin: where do we stand in 2016?

Rifabutin is a spiro-piperidyl-rifamycin structurally closely related to rifampicin that shares many of its properties. We attempted to address the reasons why this drug, which was recently recognized as a WHO Essential Medicine, still had a far narrower range of indications than rifampicin, 24 years after its launch. In this comprehensive review of the classic and more recent rifabutin experimental and clinical studies, the current state of knowledge about rifabutin is depicted, relying on specific pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antimicrobial properties, resistance data and side effects compared with rifampicin. There are consistent in vitro data and clinical studies showing that rifabutin has at least equivalent activity/efficacy and acceptable tolerance compared with rifampicin in TB and non-tuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Clinical studies have emphasized the clinical benefits of low rifabutin liver induction in patients with AIDS under PIs, in solid organ transplant patients under immunosuppressive drugs or in patients presenting intolerable side effects related to rifampicin. The contribution of rifabutin for rifampicin-resistant, but rifabutin-susceptible, Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates according to the present breakpoints has been challenged and is now controversial. Compared with rifampicin, rifabutin's lower AUC is balanced by higher intracellular penetration and lower MIC for most pathogens. Clinical studies are lacking in non-mycobacterial infections.

Mycobacterium bovis hip bursitis in a lung transplant recipient

We present a report of extrapulmonary Mycobacterium bovis infection in a lung transplant recipient. M. bovis is acquired predominantly by zoonotic transmission, particularly from consumption of unpasteurized foods. We discuss epidemiologic exposure, especially as relates to the Mexico-US border, clinical characteristics, resistance profile, and treatment.

Treatment Experience of Severe Abdominal Infection after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

This study aims to investigate the causes and treatment experience of severe abdominal infection after orthotopic liver transplantation. Clinical data were retrospectively analysed in perioperative severe abdominal infection of 186 orthotopic liver transplantation cases from March 2004 to November 2011. Among the 186 patients, 16 cases had severe abdominal infection: five cases had bile duct anastomotic leakage-inducing massive hydrops and infection under liver interstice, 10 cases had extensive bleeding of surgical wound leading to massive haematocele and infection around the liver, and one case had postoperative lower oesophageal fistula leakage causing massive hydrops and infection under the left diaphragm. After definite diagnosis, 12 cases underwent surgery within three days, with no death. Among the four cases that underwent surgery three days after diagnosis, one case died of multiple-organ failure five days after abdominal cavity exploration, which was performed 21 days after liver transplantation. Severe abdominal infections after liver transplantation were the most common causes of death in perioperative liver transplantation. Comprehensive treatment with efficacious antibiotics, multiple-organ support, controlled surgical removal of the lesion, and adequate drainage establishment was the key to the entire treatment.

Central nervous system syndromes in solid organ transplant recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients have a high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) complications, including both focal and diffuse neurologic deficits. In the immunocompromised host, the initial clinical evaluation must focus on both life-threatening CNS infections and vascular or anatomic lesions. The clinical signs and symptoms of CNS processes are modified by the immunosuppression required to prevent graft rejection. In this population, these etiologies often coexist with drug toxicities and metabolic abnormalities that complicate the development of a specific approach to clinical management. This review assesses the multiple risk factors for CNS processes in solid organ transplant recipients and establishes a timeline to assist in the evaluation and management of these complex patients.

Challenging issues in tuberculosis in solid organ transplantation

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at risk for opportunistic infections including tuberculosis. Although guidelines on the management of latent tuberculosis and active tuberculosis are available, there remain a number of clinical areas with limited guidance. We discuss challenges in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of latent and active tuberculosis in SOT candidates and recipients who reside in low-tuberculosis-prevalence areas. We discuss the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis in SOT candidates/recipients using tuberculin skin tests and interferon-γ release assays and risk stratification of SOT candidates/recipients that would identify individuals at high risk for latent tuberculosis despite negative test results. Through a careful review of posttransplant tuberculosis cases, we identify a history of treated tuberculosis in SOT recipients as a risk factor for development of posttransplant active tuberculosis. Finally, we include comparisons of recommendations by several large transplant organizations and identify areas for future research.