Thalamic stimulation for tremor: Can target determination be improved?

Cerebellar Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Essential Tremor Patients with Thalamic Stimulation: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Essential tremor (ET) is a disabling condition resulting from a dysfunction of cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuitry. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) or lesion of the ventral-intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) is an effective treatment for severe ET. Transcranial cerebellar brain stimulation has recently emerged as a non-invasive potential therapeutic option. Here, we aim to investigate the effects of high-frequency non-invasive cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in severe ET patients already operated for VIM-DBS. Eleven ET patients with VIM-DBS, and 10 ET patients without VIM-DBS and matched for tremor severity, were included in this double-blind proof-of-concept controlled study. All patients received unilateral cerebellar sham-tACS and active-tACS for 10 min. Tremor severity was blindly assessed at baseline, without VIM-DBS, during sham-tACS, during and at 0, 20, 40 min after active-tACS, using kinetic recordings during holding posture and action ('nose-to-target') task and videorecorded Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) clinical scales. In the VIM-DBS group, active-tACS significantly improved both postural and action tremor amplitude and clinical (FTM scales) severity, relative to baseline, whereas sham-tACS did not, with a predominant effect for the ipsilateral arm. Tremor amplitude and clinical severity were also not significantly different between ON VIM-DBS and active-tACS conditions. In the non-VIM-DBS group, we also observed significant improvements in ipsilateral action tremor amplitude, and clinical severity after cerebellar active-tACS, with a trend for improved postural tremor amplitude. In non-VIM-DBS group, sham- active-tACS also decreased clinical scores. These data support the safety and potential efficacy of high-frequency cerebellar-tACS to reduce ET amplitude and severity.

The role of tractography in the localization of the Vim nucleus of the thalamus and the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract for the treatment of tremor

INTRODUCTION

The ventralis intermedius (Vim) nucleus of the thalamus is the usual surgical target for tremor. However, locating the structure may be difficult as it is not visible with conventional imaging methods; therefore, surgical procedures typically use indirect calculations correlated with clinical and intraoperative neurophysiological findings. Current ablative surgical procedures such as Gamma-Knife thalamotomy and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound require new alternatives for locating the Vim nucleus. In this review, we compare Vim nucleus location for the treatment of tremor using stereotactic procedures versus direct location by means of tractography.

DISCUSSION

The most widely used cytoarchitectonic definition of the Vim nucleus is that established by Schaltenbrand and Wahren. There is a well-defined limit between the motor and the sensory thalamus; Vim neurons respond to passive joint movements and are synchronous with peripheral tremor. The most frequently used stereotactic coordinates for the Vim nucleus are based on indirect calculations referencing the mid-commissural line and third ventricle, which vary between patients. Recent studies suggest that the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract is an optimal target for controlling tremor, citing a clinical improvement; however, this has not yet been corroborated.

CONCLUSIONS

Visualisation of the cerebello-rubro-thalamic pathway by tractography may help in locating the Vim nucleus. The technique has several limitations, and the method requires standardisation to obtain more precise results. The utility of direct targeting by tractography over indirect targeting for patients with tremor remains to be demonstrated in the long-term.

Neurophysiology during movement disorder surgery

During stereotactic procedures for treating medically refractory movement disorders, intraoperative neurophysiology shifts its focus from simply monitoring the effects of surgery to an integral part of the surgical procedure. The small size, poor visualization, and physiologic nature of these deep brain targets compel the surgeon to rely on some form of physiologic for confirmation of proper anatomic targeting. Even given the newer reliance on imaging and asleep deep brain stimulator electrode placement, it is still a physiologic target and thus some form of intraoperative physiology is necessary. This chapter reviews the neurophysiologic monitoring method of microelectrode recording that is commonly employed during these neurosurgical procedures today.

Does the Use of Intraoperative Microelectrode Recording Influence the Final Location of Lead Implants in the Ventral Intermediate Nucleus for Deep Brain Stimulation?

To determine if the use of intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) influences the final location of lead implant in deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM), and to evaluate the incidence of associated complications. The usefulness of intraoperative MER in DBS is debated, some centers suggesting it increases complications without additional benefit. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent VIM DBS with MER at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston from June 1, 2009 to October 1, 2013. Initial (MRI determined) and final (intraoperative MER determined) coordinates of implant were compared. To assess incidences of hemorrhagic and infectious complications, we reviewed postoperative CT scans and follow-up notes. Forty-five lead implants on 24 patients were reviewed. The mean age at implantation was 62.42 years (range 18-83). The average duration from diagnosis to surgery was 21.5 years (range 1-52). A statistically significant mean difference was observed in the superior-inferior plane (0.52 ± 0.80 mm inferiorly, p < 0.05) and the anterior-posterior plane (0.45 ± 0.86 mm posteriorly, p < 0.05). A non-statistically significant difference was also observed in the medial-lateral plane (0.02± 0.15 mm, p > 0.05). One patient developed an infectious complication (4.2 %) that required removal of leads; two patients had minimal asymptomatic intra-ventricular bleeding (8.3 %). In our DBS center, intraoperative MER in VIM DBS implant does not seem to have a higher rate of surgical complications compared to historical series not using MER, and might also be useful in determining the final lead location.

[The use of neuromodulation for the treatment of tremor]

BACKGROUND

Tremor may be a disabling disorder and pharmacologic treatment is the first-line therapy for these patients. Nevertheless, this treatment may lead to a satisfactory tremor reduction in only 50% of patients with essential tremor. Thalamotomy was the treatment of choice for tremor refractory to medical therapy until deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermedius nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus has started being used. Nowadays, thalamotomy is rarely performed.

METHODS

This article is a non-systematic review of the indications, results, programming parameters and surgical technique of DBS of the Vim for the treatment of tremor.

RESULTS

In spite of the fact that it is possible to achieve similar clinical results using thalamotomy or DBS of the Vim, the former causes more adverse effects than the latter. Furthermore, DBS can be used bilaterally, whereas thalamotomy has a high risk of causing disartria when it is performed in both sides. DBS of the Vim achieved an adequate tremor improvement in several series of patients with tremor caused by essential tremor, Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis. Besides the Vim, there are other targets, which are being used by some authors, such as the zona incerta and the prelemniscal radiations.

CONCLUSION

DBS of the Vim is a useful treatment for disabling tremor refractory to medical therapy. It is essential to carry out an accurate patient selection as well as to use a proper surgical technique. The best stereotactic target for tremor is still unknown, although the Vim is the most used one.

The variability of atlas-based targets in relation to surrounding major fibre tracts in thalamic deep brain stimulation

BACKGROUND

In essential tremor (ET), the main target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the thalamic ventralis intermedius nucleus (Vim). This target cannot be identified on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Therefore, targeting depends on probabilistic coordinates derived from stereotactic atlases. The goal of our study was to investigate the variability of atlas-based Vim targets in relation to surrounding major fibre tracts.

METHODS

With the MRI and computed tomography (CT) scan data of ten patients who underwent DBS, we planned atlas based Vim targets in both hemispheres. We also performed deterministic fibre-tracking with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRTT), pyramidal tract (PT) and lemniscus medialis (LM) in all 20 hemispheres. Subsequently, we measured the distance from the atlas-based Vim target to each tract along the medial/lateral (x-coordinate), anterior/posterior (y-coordinate) and superior/inferior axis (z-coordinate).

RESULTS

Seventeen out of 20 DRTTs could be depicted with our standardised DTI/fibre-tracking parameters. The PT and the LM could be displayed in all 20 hemispheres. The atlas-based Vim target was found inside the DRTT in 11 (concerning the x-coordinate) and 10 hemispheres (concerning the z-coordinate). Regarding the anterior/posterior direction, the target was posterior to the DRTT in 11 cases. In 19 hemispheres the Vim target was located medial and superior to the PT and in 17 hemispheres posterior to it. Concerning the LM, the Vim target was found inside the LM in 16 (regarding the x-coordinate) and in 14 cases (regarding the z-coordinate). In eight cases it was located inside and in 12 cases anterior to the LM concerning the y-coordinate.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a considerable variability of the location of atlas-based target points of the ventralis intermedius nucleus in relation to neighbouring major fibre tracts in individual patients. These results suggest that individualised targeting to structures not directly visible on conventional MRI is necessary.

Motor thalamus integration of cortical, cerebellar and basal ganglia information: implications for normal and parkinsonian conditions

Motor thalamus (Mthal) is implicated in the control of movement because it is strategically located between motor areas of the cerebral cortex and motor-related subcortical structures, such as the cerebellum and basal ganglia (BG). The role of BG and cerebellum in motor control has been extensively studied but how Mthal processes inputs from these two networks is unclear. Specifically, there is considerable debate about the role of BG inputs on Mthal activity. This review summarizes anatomical and physiological knowledge of the Mthal and its afferents and reviews current theories of Mthal function by discussing the impact of cortical, BG and cerebellar inputs on Mthal activity. One view is that Mthal activity in BG and cerebellar-receiving territories is primarily "driven" by glutamatergic inputs from the cortex or cerebellum, respectively, whereas BG inputs are modulatory and do not strongly determine Mthal activity. This theory is steeped in the assumption that the Mthal processes information in the same way as sensory thalamus, through interactions of modulatory inputs with a single driver input. Another view, from BG models, is that BG exert primary control on the BG-receiving Mthal so it effectively relays information from BG to cortex. We propose a new "super-integrator" theory where each Mthal territory processes multiple driver or driver-like inputs (cortex and BG, cortex and cerebellum), which are the result of considerable integrative processing. Thus, BG and cerebellar Mthal territories assimilate motivational and proprioceptive motor information previously integrated in cortico-BG and cortico-cerebellar networks, respectively, to develop sophisticated motor signals that are transmitted in parallel pathways to cortical areas for optimal generation of motor programmes. Finally, we briefly review the pathophysiological changes that occur in the BG in parkinsonism and generate testable hypotheses about how these may affect processing of inputs in the Mthal.

Neuropathology of sporadic Parkinson's disease: evaluation and changes of concepts

Parkinson's disease (PD), one of the most frequent neurodegenerative disorders, is no longer considered a complex motor disorder characterized by extrapyramidal symptoms, but a progressive multisystem or-more correctly-multiorgan disease with variegated neurological and nonmotor deficiencies. It is morphologically featured not only by the degeneration of the dopaminergic nigrostriatal system, responsible for the core motor deficits, but by multifocal involvement of the central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system and other organs associated with widespread occurrence of Lewy bodies and dystrophic Lewy neurites. This results from deposition of abnormal α-synuclein (αSyn), the major protein marker of PD, and other synucleinopathies. Recent research has improved both the clinical and neuropathological diagnostic criteria of PD; it has further provided insights into the development and staging of αSyn and Lewy pathologies and has been useful in understanding the pathogenesis of PD. However, many challenges remain, for example, the role of Lewy bodies and the neurobiology of axons in the course of neurodegeneration, the relation between αSyn, Lewy pathology, and clinical deficits, as well as the interaction between αSyn and other pathologic proteins. Although genetic and experimental models have contributed to exploring the causes, pathomechanisms, and treatment options of PD, there is still a lack of an optimal animal model, and the etiology of this devastating disease is far from being elucidated.