Sensitivity and specificity of different hand positions to assess upper limb rest tremor

Bedside clinical assessment of patients with common upper limb tremor and algorithmic approach

The diagnostic approach for patients with tremor is challenging due to the complex and overlapping phenotypes among tremor syndromes. The first step in the evaluation of tremor is to identify the tremulous movement and exclude the tremor mimics. The second step is to classify the tremor syndrome based on the characteristics of tremor from historical clues and focused examination (Axis 1). Comprehensive tremor examinations involve the assessment of tremor in different conditions (rest, action or mixed, position or task-specific), distribution of tremor (upper limb, lower limb, head, jaw), positive signs for functional tremor (FT) if suspected (distractibility, entrainment, co-contraction), and associated neurological signs including parkinsonism, dystonic posture, cerebellar/brainstem signs, neuropathy, and cognitive impairment. A pivotal feature in this step is to determine any distinct feature of a specific isolated or combined tremor syndrome. In this review, we propose an algorithm to assess upper limb tremors. Ancillary testing should be performed if clinical evaluation is unclear. The choice of investigation depends on the types of tremors considered to narrow down the spectrum of etiology (Axis 2). Laboratory blood tests are considered for acute onset and acute worsening of tremors, while structural neuroimaging is indicated in unilateral tremors with acute onset, nonclassical presentations, and a combination of neurological symptoms. Neurophysiological study is an important tool that aids in distinguishing between tremor and myoclonus, etiology of tremor and document specific signs of FT. Treatment is mainly symptomatic based depending on the etiology of the tremor and the patient's disabilities.

Age and Sex Affect Essential Tremor (ET) Plus: Clinical Heterogeneity in ET Based on the National Survey in China

The new term essential tremor (ET) plus was proposed in the 2018 tremor consensus criteria. The National Survey of Essential Tremor Plus in China, a large multicenter registry study, aimed to evaluate the clinical features of pure ET and ET plus and explore possible factors related to ET plus. All patients with ET underwent neurological examination and neuropsychological assessment at 17 clinical sites. The diagnosis was made according to the 2018 consensus criteria. Clinicodemographic characteristics were analyzed. A total of 1160 patients were included, including 546 patients with pure ET and 614 patients with ET plus. The proportion of females was significantly higher in the ET plus than that in the pure ET (P = 0.001). The age at onset (AAO) of pure ET showed a bimodal distribution, with peaks in the 2nd and 5th decades. However, the AAO of the ET plus group demonstrated a skewed distribution, with a single peak in the 6th decade. Female sex (OR=1.645, P<0.001), older age (OR=1.023, P<0.001), lower educational level (OR=0.934, P<0.001), head tremor (OR=1.457, P<0.001), and higher the Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS)-II scores (OR=1.134, P<0.001) were significantly associated with ET plus. Old age and female sex may contribute to ET plus development. Pure ET showed a bimodal distribution for AAO, whereas ET plus showed a unimodal distribution. It remains unclear whether pure ET and ET plus are merely different stages of a single disease or represent distinct disease entities.

Essential tremor plus rest tremor: current concepts and controversies

Since the initial description of Essential Tremor (ET), the entity of ET with rest tremor has proven to be a controversial concept. Some authors argued it could be a late manifestation of ET, others suggested it could be a variant of ET, yet others suggested it could represent a transitional state between ET and Parkinson's disease. The novel tremor classification has proposed the construct of ET-plus to differentiate patients with rest tremor from pure ET. However, there is no clarity of what ET-plus rest tremor represents. With the aim of shedding light on this controversial entity, we have, therefore, systematically reviewed all clinical, electrophysiological, imaging and anatomopathological studies indexed in the Medline database published both before and after the new tremor classification and involving patients with ET-plus rest tremor. Forty-four studies involving 4028 patients were included in this review and analyzed in detail by means of descriptive statistics. The results of the current review suggest that ET-plus rest tremor is a heterogenous group of conditions: thus, rest tremor might represent a late feature of ET, might reflect a different disorder with higher age at onset and lower dependance on genetic susceptibility than ET, might suggest the development of Parkinson's disease or might indicate a misdiagnosis of ET. The reviewed lines of evidence refuse recent claims arguing against the construct of ET-plus, which should be viewed as a syndrome with different possible underpinnings, and highlights methodological issues to be solved in future research.

Shaky hands are a part of motor neuron disease phenotype: clinical and electrophysiological study of 77 patients

BACKGROUND

In the sharp contrast with the existing literature, we frequently observe minipolymyoclonus, tremor and pseudodystonic thumb posturing in patients with motor neuron disease. We conducted a clinical and electrophysiological study to describe phenomenology, prevalence and pathophysiology of involuntary movements in motor neuron disease.

METHODS

We included 77 consecutive patients. Involuntary movements were assessed at rest and on action. Patients were videotaped. Arm muscle tone, power and deep tendon reflexes were evaluated. Accelerometry with electromyography was recorded in a subset of patients.

RESULTS

Involuntary movements were observed in 68.9% of patients and could be separated into rest minipolymyoclonus, thumb tremor, pseudodystonic thumb posture, action minipolymyoclonus, and action tremor. One-third of patients reported negative impact of involuntary movements on hand use. Logistic regression showed that rest minipolymyoclonus and thumb tremor were more likely to occur in patients with more prominent distal muscle weakness and less spasticity. Similarly, action involuntary movements were more likely to appear in weaker patients. Patients with brisk tendon reflexes were more likely to display action tremor than action minipolymyoclonus. Action tremor was characterized by accelerometer and corresponding electromyography peak frequency, which decreased with mass loading, suggesting a mechanical-reflex tremor.

CONCLUSIONS

Involuntary movements are common, but poorly recognized feature of motor neuron disease that may add to functional impairment. Results of our study suggest that involuntary movements are likely of peripheral origin, with a non-fused contraction of enlarged motor units being a common driving mechanism. Minipolymyoclonus appears if no synchronization of motor units occurs. When synchronization occurs via stretch reflex, mechanical-reflex tremor is generated.

Differentiation of Parkinson’s disease tremor and essential tremor based on a novel hand posture

Background

Tremor is one of the most common movement disorders but the correct diagnosis of tremor disorders, especially the differentiation between Parkinson’s disease tremor (PT) and essential tremor (ET) remains a challenge for clinicians.

Method

We examined a novel hand position to distinguish PT from ET. We prospectively collected accelerometric tremor data in 14 ET patients and 14 PT patients with arms and hands fully stretched against arms stretched and hands relaxed, i. e. hanging down. The total acceleration from the three pairwise-perpendicular accelerometric axes during the 1-minute blocks of the two hand positions were computed and high-passed filtered at 2 Hz. The power spectral density during each hand position was calculated and summed up over the frequency domain.

Results

Our results showed a significantly higher occurrence of tremor in the hands hanging down position in PT patients compared to ET patients (p = 0.0262). Moreover, in PT patients the tremor intensity significantly increased when transitioning from the stretched hand position to the hanging-down position (83 % of cohort) and vice versa in ET patients (75 % of cohort).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the new hand posture can differentiate between PT and ET with high accuracy (sensitivity 83 %, specificity 75 % for PT) and may be a helpful tool in the clinical assessment of tremor.

Bayesian Interpretation of Essential Tremor Plus

Essential tremor (ET) plus is a new tremor classification that was introduced in 2018 by a task force of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Patients with ET plus meet the criteria for ET but have one or more additional systemic or neurologic signs of uncertain significance or relevance to tremor (“soft signs”). Soft signs are not sufficient to diagnose another tremor syndrome or movement disorder, and soft signs in ET plus are known to have poor interrater reliability and low diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the clinical significance of ET plus must be interpreted probabilistically when judging whether a patient is more likely to have ET or a combined tremor syndrome, such as dystonic tremor. Such a probabilistic interpretation is possible with Bayesian analysis. This review presents a Bayesian analysis of ET plus in patients suspected of having ET versus a dystonic tremor syndrome, which is the most common differential diagnosis in patients referred for ET. Bayesian analysis of soft signs provides an estimate of the probability that a patient with possible ET is more likely to have an alternative diagnosis. ET plus is a distinct tremor classification and should not be viewed as a subtype of ET. ET plus covers a more-comprehensive phenotyping of people with possible ET, and the clinical interpretation of ET plus is enhanced with Bayesian analysis of associated soft signs.

Rest tremor correlates with reduced contralateral striatal dopamine transporter binding in Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

In vivo dopamine transporter imaging is a useful tool for distinguishing nigrostriatal pathologies (e.g. Parkinson's disease) from other causes of tremor. However, while many of the motoric features of Parkinson's disease (e.g. bradykinesia, rigidity, hypomimia) correlate well with reduced striatal dopamine transporter binding, the same relationship has not been demonstrated for tremor. We investigated the relationship between striatal dopamine transporter binding and quantitative measures of tremor.

METHODS

23 participants with Parkinson's disease underwent standardised clinical assessment including structured, videotaped clinical examination, tremor neurophysiology study of both upper limbs using accelerometry and surface EMG, and Technitium-99 m TRODAT-1 brain SPECT imaging. Normalised striatal uptake values were calculated. Tremor EMG and accelerometry time series were processed with Fourier transformation to identify peak tremor power within a window of 3-10Hz and to calculate the tremor stability index (TSI).

RESULTS

Spearman correlation analyses revealed an association between tremor power and contralaterally reduced striatal uptake in a number of recording conditions. This association was strongest for rest tremor, followed by postural tremor, with the weakest association observed for kinetic tremor. Lower TSI was also associated with lower contralateral striatal uptake in a number of rest and postural conditions.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest a relationship between Parkinsonian rest tremor and contralateral reduction in striatal dopamine binding. Use of quantitative neurophysiology techniques may allow the demonstration of clinico-pathophysiological relationships in tremor that have remained occult to previous studies.

Rest tremor in dystonia: epidemiology, differential diagnosis, and pathophysiology

BACKGROUND

The most common type of tremor reported in dystonia patients is postural and kinetic. There is uncertainty regarding the prevalence of rest tremor in dystonia.

OBJECTIVE

This review focuses on the clinical and neurophysiological features of rest tremor in dystonia, its differential diagnosis, and methods to distinguish it from other rest tremor syndromes.

METHODS

A PubMed search was done, and the available literature identified. Bibliography of the available literature was reviewed for relevant references.

RESULTS

Rest tremor in dystonia has been reported with a variable frequency of 1.81-12.05%. The most common body distribution is arm, and it tends to be asymmetric. Most of the affected patients have multifocal and segmental dystonia. Rest tremor is a late-onset phenomenon associated with severe and spreading dystonia. Clinically, it is difficult to distinguish rest tremor in dystonia from other rest tremor syndromes based on tremor characteristics; however, other neurological signs can provide clues to differentiate these syndromes. Surface electromyography and other neurophysiological tests can help differentiate the various rest tremor syndromes.

CONCLUSION

Rest tremor in dystonia can be differentiated from other rest tremor syndromes based on neurophysiological techniques. There is some evidence to suggest that SWEDDs could be a form of dystonic tremor, but further studies are required to clarify this diagnostic dilemma. Data regarding the treatment of rest tremor in dystonia are virtually nonexistent, and there is an urgent need for prospective studies focusing its medical management and to know the surgical targets.