Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210G>A: the consumer experience

Ancestral diversity in lipoprotein(a) studies helps address evidence gaps

INTRODUCTION

The independent and causal cardiovascular disease risk factor lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is elevated in >1.5 billion individuals worldwide, but studies have prioritised European populations.

METHODS

Here, we examined how ancestrally diverse studies could clarify Lp(a)'s genetic architecture, inform efforts examining application of Lp(a) polygenic risk scores (PRS), enable causal inference and identify unexpected Lp(a) phenotypic effects using data from African (n=25 208), East Asian (n=2895), European (n=362 558), South Asian (n=8192) and Hispanic/Latino (n=8946) populations.

RESULTS

Fourteen genome-wide significant loci with numerous population specific signals of large effect were identified that enabled construction of Lp(a) PRS of moderate (R2=15% in East Asians) to high (R2=50% in Europeans) accuracy. For all populations, PRS showed promise as a 'rule out' for elevated Lp(a) because certainty of assignment to the low-risk threshold was high (88.0%-99.9%) across PRS thresholds (80th-99th percentile). Causal effects of increased Lp(a) with increased glycated haemoglobin were estimated for Europeans (p value =1.4×10-6), although inverse effects in Africans and East Asians suggested the potential for heterogeneous causal effects. Finally, Hispanic/Latinos were the only population in which known associations with coronary atherosclerosis and ischaemic heart disease were identified in external testing of Lp(a) PRS phenotypic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results emphasise the merits of prioritising ancestral diversity when addressing Lp(a) evidence gaps.

Factor V Leiden and the 10-year incidence of depression: A retrospective cohort study conducted in Germany

There is limited literature on the long-term relationship between the diagnosis of factor V Leiden (FVL) and depression. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the association between FVL and the 10-year incidence of depression in Germany. Patients diagnosed with FVL for the first time in one of 1,274 general practices in Germany between 2000 and 2019 were included in this study (index date). Patients without FVL were matched (1:5) to those with FVL by sex, age, index year, and the average number of consultations per year. In individuals without FVL, index date corresponded to a randomly selected visit date between 2000 and 2019. The association between the diagnosis of FVL and the 10-year incidence of depression was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. This study included 1,070 patients with and 5,350 patients without FVL (64.9% women; 46.0 [16.5] years). Ten years after the index date, 21.4% and 14.1% of individuals with and without FVL were diagnosed with depression, respectively (log-rank p-value<0.001). After adjusting for thromboembolic events, the Cox regression analysis further showed that FVL was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of depression (HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.33-1.95). In this study conducted in Germany, FVL was identified as a long-term risk factor for depression. More research is needed to confirm or refute the present findings in other settings.

Prevalence of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency, Self-Reported Behavior Change, and Health Care Engagement Among Direct-to-Consumer Recipients of a Personalized Genetic Risk Report

BACKGROUND

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is an autosomal co-dominant condition that predisposes to emphysema, cirrhosis, panniculitis, and vasculitis. Underrecognition has prompted efforts to enhance early detection and testing of at-risk individuals. Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing represents an additional method of detection.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The study addressed three questions: (1) Does a DTC testing service identify previously undetected individuals with AATD? (2) What was the interval between initial AATD-related symptoms and initial diagnosis of AATD in such individuals? and (3) What was the behavioral impact of learning about a new diagnosis of AATD through a DTC test?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 195,014 individuals responded to a survey within the 23andMe, Inc. research platform.

RESULTS

Among 195,014 study participants, the allele frequency for the PI∗S and PI∗Z AATD variants was 21.6% (6.5% for PI∗Z and 15.1% for PI∗S); 0.63% were PI∗ZZ, half of whom reported having a physician confirm the diagnosis. Approximately 27% of those with physician-diagnosed AATD reported first becoming aware of AATD through the DTC test. Among those newly aware participants, the diagnostic delay interval was 22.3 years. Participants frequently shared their DTC test results with health care providers (HCPs) and the reported impact of learning a diagnosis of AATD was high. For example, 51.1% of PI∗ZZ individuals shared their DTC result with an HCP. The OR for PI∗ZZ smokers to report smoking reduction as a result of receiving the DTC result was 1.7 (95% CI = 1.4-2.2) compared with those without a Z allele and for reduced alcohol consumption this was 4.0 (95% CI = 2.6-5.9).

INTERPRETATION

In this largest available report on DTC testing for AATD, this test, in combination with clinical follow-up, can help to identify previously undiagnosed AATD patients. Moreover, receipt of the DTC AATD report was associated with positive behavior change, especially among those with risk variants.

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210G>A: the consumer experience

Background

Clinical genetic testing for inherited predisposition to venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common among patients and their families. However, there is incomplete consensus about which individuals should receive testing, and the relative risks and benefits.

Methods

We assessed outcomes of receiving direct‐to‐consumer (DTC) results for the two most common genetic risk factors for VTE, factor V Leiden in the F5 gene (FVL) and prothrombin 20210G>A in the F2 gene (PT). Two thousand three hundred fifty‐four customers (1244 variant‐positive and 1110 variant‐negative individuals) of the personal genetics company 23andMe, Inc., who had received results online for F5 and F2 variants, participated in an online survey‐based study. Participants responded to questions about perception of VTE risk, discussion of results with healthcare providers (HCPs) and recommendations received, actions taken to control risk, emotional responses to receiving risk results, and perceived value of the information.

Results

Most participants (90% of variant‐positive individuals, 99% of variant‐negative individuals) had not previously been tested for F5 and/or F2 variants. The majority of variant‐positive individuals correctly perceived that they were at higher than average risk for developing VTE. These individuals reported moderate rates of discussing results with HCPs (41%); receiving prevention advice from HCPs (31%), and making behavioral changes to control risk (e.g., exercising more, 30%). A minority (36%) of variant‐positive individuals worried more after receiving VTE results. Nevertheless, most participants reported that knowing their risk had been an advantage (78% variant‐positive and 58% variant‐negative) and were satisfied knowing their genetic probability for VTE (81% variant‐positive and 67% variant‐negative).

Conclusion

Consumers reported moderate rates of behavioral change and perceived personal benefit from receiving DTC genetic results for VTE risk.

We assessed the consumer experience receiving direct‐to‐consumer (DTC) genetic risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). 2354 customers (1244 variant‐positive and 1110 variant‐negative individuals) of the personal genetics company 23andMe, Inc., who had received results online for risk variants in clotting factor genes F2 and F5, participated in an online survey‐based study. Participants responded to questions about perception of VTE risk, discussion of results with healthcare providers and recommendations received, actions taken to control risk, emotional responses to receiving risk results, and perceived value of the information.