Automatic segmentation, classification, and follow-up of optic pathway gliomas using deep learning and fuzzy c-means clustering based on MRI

Towards consistency in pediatric brain tumor measurements: Challenges, solutions, and the role of artificial intelligence-based segmentation

MR imaging is central to the assessment of tumor burden and changes over time in neuro-oncology. Several response assessment guidelines have been set forth by the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working groups in different tumor histologies; however, the visual delineation of tumor components using MRIs is not always straightforward, and complexities not currently addressed by these criteria can introduce inter- and intra-observer variability in manual assessments. Differentiation of non-enhancing tumors from peritumoral edema, mild enhancement from absence of enhancement, and various cystic components can be challenging; particularly given a lack of sufficient and uniform imaging protocols in clinical practice. Automated tumor segmentation with artificial intelligence (AI) may be able to provide more objective delineations, but rely on accurate and consistent training data created manually (ground truth). Herein, this paper reviews existing challenges and potential solutions to identifying and defining subregions of pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) that are not explicitly addressed by current guidelines. The goal is to assert the importance of defining and adopting criteria for addressing these challenges, as it will be critical to achieving standardized tumor measurements and reproducible response assessment in PBTs, ultimately leading to more precise outcome metrics and accurate comparisons among clinical studies.

nnU-Net-based Segmentation of Tumor Subcompartments in Pediatric Medulloblastoma Using Multiparametric MRI: A Multi-institutional Study

Purpose To evaluate nnU-Net-based segmentation models for automated delineation of medulloblastoma tumors on multi-institutional MRI scans. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 78 pediatric patients (52 male, 26 female), with ages ranging from 2 to 18 years, with medulloblastomas, from three different sites (28 from hospital A, 18 from hospital B, and 32 from hospital C), who had data available from three clinical MRI protocols (gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery). The scans were retrospectively collected from the year 2000 until May 2019. Reference standard annotations of the tumor habitat, including enhancing tumor, edema, and cystic core plus nonenhancing tumor subcompartments, were performed by two experienced neuroradiologists. Preprocessing included registration to age-appropriate atlases, skull stripping, bias correction, and intensity matching. The two models were trained as follows: (a) the transfer learning nnU-Net model was pretrained on an adult glioma cohort (n = 484) and fine-tuned on medulloblastoma studies using Models Genesis and (b) the direct deep learning nnU-Net model was trained directly on the medulloblastoma datasets, across fivefold cross-validation. Model robustness was evaluated on the three datasets when using different combinations of training and test sets, with data from two sites at a time used for training and data from the third site used for testing. Results Analysis on the three test sites yielded Dice scores of 0.81, 0.86, and 0.86 and 0.80, 0.86, and 0.85 for tumor habitat; 0.68, 0.84, and 0.77 and 0.67, 0.83, and 0.76 for enhancing tumor; 0.56, 0.71, and 0.69 and 0.56, 0.71, and 0.70 for edema; and 0.32, 0.48, and 0.43 and 0.29, 0.44, and 0.41 for cystic core plus nonenhancing tumor for the transfer learning and direct nnU-Net models, respectively. The models were largely robust to site-specific variations. Conclusion nnU-Net segmentation models hold promise for accurate, robust automated delineation of medulloblastoma tumor subcompartments, potentially leading to more effective radiation therapy planning in pediatric medulloblastoma. Keywords: Pediatrics, MR Imaging, Segmentation, Transfer Learning, Medulloblastoma, nnU-Net, MRI Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024 See also the commentary by Rudie and Correia de Verdier in this issue.

Stepwise Transfer Learning for Expert-level Pediatric Brain Tumor MRI Segmentation in a Limited Data Scenario

Purpose To develop, externally test, and evaluate clinical acceptability of a deep learning pediatric brain tumor segmentation model using stepwise transfer learning. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, the authors leveraged two T2-weighted MRI datasets (May 2001 through December 2015) from a national brain tumor consortium (n = 184; median age, 7 years [range, 1-23 years]; 94 male patients) and a pediatric cancer center (n = 100; median age, 8 years [range, 1-19 years]; 47 male patients) to develop and evaluate deep learning neural networks for pediatric low-grade glioma segmentation using a stepwise transfer learning approach to maximize performance in a limited data scenario. The best model was externally tested on an independent test set and subjected to randomized blinded evaluation by three clinicians, wherein they assessed clinical acceptability of expert- and artificial intelligence (AI)-generated segmentations via 10-point Likert scales and Turing tests. Results The best AI model used in-domain stepwise transfer learning (median Dice score coefficient, 0.88 [IQR, 0.72-0.91] vs 0.812 [IQR, 0.56-0.89] for baseline model; P = .049). With external testing, the AI model yielded excellent accuracy using reference standards from three clinical experts (median Dice similarity coefficients: expert 1, 0.83 [IQR, 0.75-0.90]; expert 2, 0.81 [IQR, 0.70-0.89]; expert 3, 0.81 [IQR, 0.68-0.88]; mean accuracy, 0.82). For clinical benchmarking (n = 100 scans), experts rated AI-based segmentations higher on average compared with other experts (median Likert score, 9 [IQR, 7-9] vs 7 [IQR 7-9]) and rated more AI segmentations as clinically acceptable (80.2% vs 65.4%). Experts correctly predicted the origin of AI segmentations in an average of 26.0% of cases. Conclusion Stepwise transfer learning enabled expert-level automated pediatric brain tumor autosegmentation and volumetric measurement with a high level of clinical acceptability. Keywords: Stepwise Transfer Learning, Pediatric Brain Tumors, MRI Segmentation, Deep Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Comparison of volumetric and 2D-based response methods in the PNOC-001 pediatric low-grade glioma clinical trial

Background

Although response in pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) includes volumetric assessment, more simplified 2D-based methods are often used in clinical trials. The study's purpose was to compare volumetric to 2D methods.

Methods

An expert neuroradiologist performed solid and whole tumor (including cyst and edema) volumetric measurements on MR images using a PACS-based manual segmentation tool in 43 pLGG participants (213 total follow-up images) from the Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium (PNOC-001) trial. Classification based on changes in volumetric and 2D measurements of solid tumor were compared to neuroradiologist visual response assessment using the Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS) criteria for a subset of 65 images using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Longitudinal modeling of solid tumor volume was used to predict BT-RADS classification in 54 of the 65 images.

Results

There was a significant difference in ROC area under the curve between 3D solid tumor volume and 2D area (0.96 vs 0.78, P = .005) and between 3D solid and 3D whole volume (0.96 vs 0.84, P = .006) when classifying BT-RADS progressive disease (PD). Thresholds of 15-25% increase in 3D solid tumor volume had an 80% sensitivity in classifying BT-RADS PD included in their 95% confidence intervals. The longitudinal model of solid volume response had a sensitivity of 82% and a positive predictive value of 67% for detecting BT-RADS PD.

Conclusions

Volumetric analysis of solid tumor was significantly better than 2D measurements in classifying tumor progression as determined by BT-RADS criteria and will enable more comprehensive clinical management.

Applications of artificial intelligence in magnetic resonance imaging of primary pediatric cancers: a scoping review and CLAIM score assessment

PURPOSES

To review the uses of AI for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging assessment of primary pediatric cancer and identify common literature topics and knowledge gaps. To assess the adherence of the existing literature to the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A scoping literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases was performed, including studies of > 10 subjects with a mean age of < 21 years. Relevant data were summarized into three categories based on AI application: detection, characterization, treatment and monitoring. Readers independently scored each study using CLAIM guidelines, and inter-rater reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included. The most common AI application for pediatric cancer MR imaging was pediatric tumor diagnosis and detection (13/21 [62%] studies). The most commonly studied tumor was posterior fossa tumors (14 [67%] studies). Knowledge gaps included a lack of research in AI-driven tumor staging (0/21 [0%] studies), imaging genomics (1/21 [5%] studies), and tumor segmentation (2/21 [10%] studies). Adherence to CLAIM guidelines was moderate in primary studies, with an average (range) of 55% (34%-73%) CLAIM items reported. Adherence has improved over time based on publication year.

CONCLUSION

The literature surrounding AI applications of MR imaging in pediatric cancers is limited. The existing literature shows moderate adherence to CLAIM guidelines, suggesting that better adherence is required for future studies.

Expert-level pediatric brain tumor segmentation in a limited data scenario with stepwise transfer learning

Purpose

Artificial intelligence (AI)-automated tumor delineation for pediatric gliomas would enable real-time volumetric evaluation to support diagnosis, treatment response assessment, and clinical decision-making. Auto-segmentation algorithms for pediatric tumors are rare, due to limited data availability, and algorithms have yet to demonstrate clinical translation.

Methods

We leveraged two datasets from a national brain tumor consortium (n=184) and a pediatric cancer center (n=100) to develop, externally validate, and clinically benchmark deep learning neural networks for pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) segmentation using a novel in-domain, stepwise transfer learning approach. The best model [via Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)] was externally validated and subject to randomized, blinded evaluation by three expert clinicians wherein clinicians assessed clinical acceptability of expert- and AI-generated segmentations via 10-point Likert scales and Turing tests.

Results

The best AI model utilized in-domain, stepwise transfer learning (median DSC: 0.877 [IQR 0.715-0.914]) versus baseline model (median DSC 0.812 [IQR 0.559-0.888]; p<0.05). On external testing (n=60), the AI model yielded accuracy comparable to inter-expert agreement (median DSC: 0.834 [IQR 0.726-0.901] vs. 0.861 [IQR 0.795-0.905], p=0.13). On clinical benchmarking (n=100 scans, 300 segmentations from 3 experts), the experts rated the AI model higher on average compared to other experts (median Likert rating: 9 [IQR 7-9]) vs. 7 [IQR 7-9], p<0.05 for each). Additionally, the AI segmentations had significantly higher (p<0.05) overall acceptability compared to experts on average (80.2% vs. 65.4%). Experts correctly predicted the origins of AI segmentations in an average of 26.0% of cases.

Conclusions

Stepwise transfer learning enabled expert-level, automated pediatric brain tumor auto-segmentation and volumetric measurement with a high level of clinical acceptability. This approach may enable development and translation of AI imaging segmentation algorithms in limited data scenarios.

Opportunities and Advances in Radiomics and Radiogenomics for Pediatric Medulloblastoma Tumors

Recent advances in artificial intelligence have greatly impacted the field of medical imaging and vastly improved the development of computational algorithms for data analysis. In the field of pediatric neuro-oncology, radiomics, the process of obtaining high-dimensional data from radiographic images, has been recently utilized in applications including survival prognostication, molecular classification, and tumor type classification. Similarly, radiogenomics, or the integration of radiomic and genomic data, has allowed for building comprehensive computational models to better understand disease etiology. While there exist excellent review articles on radiomics and radiogenomic pipelines and their applications in adult solid tumors, in this review article, we specifically review these computational approaches in the context of pediatric medulloblastoma tumors. Based on our systematic literature research via PubMed and Google Scholar, we provide a detailed summary of a total of 15 articles that have utilized radiomic and radiogenomic analysis for survival prognostication, tumor segmentation, and molecular subgroup classification in the context of pediatric medulloblastoma. Lastly, we shed light on the current challenges with the existing approaches as well as future directions and opportunities with using these computational radiomic and radiogenomic approaches for pediatric medulloblastoma tumors.

Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study

Background

Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors and the leading cause of cancer-related death among all childhood cancers. Tumor segmentation is essential in surgical and treatment planning, and response assessment and monitoring. However, manual segmentation is time-consuming and has high interoperator variability. We present a multi-institutional deep learning-based method for automated brain extraction and segmentation of pediatric brain tumors based on multi-parametric MRI scans.

Methods

Multi-parametric scans (T1w, T1w-CE, T2, and T2-FLAIR) of 244 pediatric patients (n=215 internal and n=29 external cohorts) with de novo brain tumors, including a variety of tumor subtypes, were preprocessed and manually segmented to identify the brain tissue and tumor subregions into four tumor subregions, i.e., enhancing tumor (ET), non-enhancing tumor (NET), cystic components (CC), and peritumoral edema (ED). The internal cohort was split into training (n=151), validation (n=43), and withheld internal test (n=21) subsets. DeepMedic, a three-dimensional convolutional neural network, was trained and the model parameters were tuned. Finally, the network was evaluated on the withheld internal and external test cohorts.

Results

Dice similarity score (median±SD) was 0.91±0.10/0.88±0.16 for the whole tumor, 0.73±0.27/0.84±0.29 for ET, 0.79±19/0.74±0.27 for union of all non-enhancing components (i.e., NET, CC, ED), and 0.98±0.02 for brain tissue in both internal/external test sets.

Conclusions

Our proposed automated brain extraction and tumor subregion segmentation models demonstrated accurate performance on segmentation of the brain tissue and whole tumor regions in pediatric brain tumors and can facilitate detection of abnormal regions for further clinical measurements.

Key Points

We proposed automated tumor segmentation and brain extraction on pediatric MRI.The volumetric measurements using our models agree with ground truth segmentations.

Importance of the Study

The current response assessment in pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) is currently based on bidirectional or 2D measurements, which underestimate the size of non-spherical and complex PBTs in children compared to volumetric or 3D methods. There is a need for development of automated methods to reduce manual burden and intra- and inter-rater variability to segment tumor subregions and assess volumetric changes. Most currently available automated segmentation tools are developed on adult brain tumors, and therefore, do not generalize well to PBTs that have different radiological appearances. To address this, we propose a deep learning (DL) auto-segmentation method that shows promising results in PBTs, collected from a publicly available large-scale imaging dataset (Children's Brain Tumor Network; CBTN) that comprises multi-parametric MRI scans of multiple PBT types acquired across multiple institutions on different scanners and protocols. As a complementary to tumor segmentation, we propose an automated DL model for brain tissue extraction.

Evolution and implementation of radiographic response criteria in neuro-oncology

Radiographic response assessment in neuro-oncology is critical in clinical practice and trials. Conventional criteria, such as the MacDonald and response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria, rely on bidimensional (2D) measurements of a single tumor cross-section. Although RANO criteria are established for response assessment in clinical trials, there is a critical need to address the complexity of brain tumor treatment response with multiple new approaches being proposed. These include volumetric analysis of tumor compartments, structured MRI reporting systems like the Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System, and standardized approaches to advanced imaging techniques to distinguish tumor response from treatment effects. In this review, we discuss the strengths and limitations of different neuro-oncology response criteria and summarize current research findings on the role of novel response methods in neuro-oncology clinical trials and practice.

Automated tumor segmentation and brain tissue extraction from multiparametric MRI of pediatric brain tumors: A multi-institutional study

Background

Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors and the leading cause of cancer-related death among all childhood cancers. Tumor segmentation is essential in surgical and treatment planning, and response assessment and monitoring. However, manual segmentation is time-consuming and has high interoperator variability. We present a multi-institutional deep learning-based method for automated brain extraction and segmentation of pediatric brain tumors based on multi-parametric MRI scans.

Methods

Multi-parametric scans (T1w, T1w-CE, T2, and T2-FLAIR) of 244 pediatric patients ( n = 215 internal and n = 29 external cohorts) with de novo brain tumors, including a variety of tumor subtypes, were preprocessed and manually segmented to identify the brain tissue and tumor subregions into four tumor subregions, i.e., enhancing tumor (ET), non-enhancing tumor (NET), cystic components (CC), and peritumoral edema (ED). The internal cohort was split into training ( n = 151), validation ( n = 43), and withheld internal test ( n = 21) subsets. DeepMedic, a three-dimensional convolutional neural network, was trained and the model parameters were tuned. Finally, the network was evaluated on the withheld internal and external test cohorts.

Results

Dice similarity score (median ± SD) was 0.91 ± 0.10/0.88 ± 0.16 for the whole tumor, 0.73 ± 0.27/0.84 ± 0.29 for ET, 0.79 ± 19/0.74 ± 0.27 for union of all non-enhancing components (i.e., NET, CC, ED), and 0.98 ± 0.02 for brain tissue in both internal/external test sets.

Conclusions

Our proposed automated brain extraction and tumor subregion segmentation models demonstrated accurate performance on segmentation of the brain tissue and whole tumor regions in pediatric brain tumors and can facilitate detection of abnormal regions for further clinical measurements.

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Brain Tumor Imaging: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Artificial intelligence (AI) has facilitated the analysis of medical imaging given increased computational capacity and medical data availability in recent years. Although many applications for AI in the imaging of brain tumors have been proposed, their potential clinical impact remains to be explored. A systematic review was performed to examine the role of AI in the analysis of pediatric brain tumor imaging.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for relevant articles up to January 27, 2021.

RESULTS

Literature search identified 298 records, of which 22 studies were included. The most commonly studied tumors were posterior fossa tumors including brainstem glioma, ependymoma, medulloblastoma, and pilocytic astrocytoma (15, 68%). Tumor diagnosis was the most frequently performed task (14, 64%), followed by tumor segmentation (3, 14%) and tumor detection (3, 14%). Of the 6 studies comparing AI to clinical experts, 5 demonstrated superiority of AI for tumor diagnosis. Other tasks including tumor segmentation, attenuation correction of positron emission tomography scans, image registration for patient positioning, and dose calculation for radiotherapy were performed with high accuracy comparable with clinical experts. No studies described use of the AI tool in routine clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

AI methods for analysis of pediatric brain tumor imaging have increased exponentially in recent years. However, adoption of these methods in clinical practice requires further characterization of validity and utility. Implementation of these methods may streamline clinical workflows by improving diagnostic accuracy and automating basic imaging analysis tasks.