Differences between water-filled and air-charged urodynamic catheters for determining the urethral pressure profile in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction patients

Why are continent catheterizable channels continent? A stomal pressure profilometry feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

A continent catheterizable channel (CCC) may be a solution for patients with impaired bladder emptying and difficult transurethral access. Leakage of the CCC is a common complication. To prevent leakage, the pressure in the CCC has to be higher than the reservoir (bladder/pouch) pressure in at least one location. It has not been clearly defined through which mechanism(s) the CCC achieves continence. In this feasibility study, we measured the CCC pressure profile in adult patients with various types of CCC's with and without stomal leakage.

METHODS

Adult patients with a CCC on a (augmented) bladder or pouch who underwent a urodynamic investigation between January and March 2023 were included. Next to the standard urodynamic investigation, a continuous stomal pressure measurement (CSP) and stomal pressure profilometry with empty bladder (SPP-1) and with filled bladder (SPP-2) of the CCC were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients were included. It was technically possible to perform SPP-1 and SPP-2 in all patients, and to measure the CSP in 16/17 patients. The median maximum stomal pressures in SPP-1 and SPP-2 were 112 (interquartile range [IQR], 76-140) cmH2O and 120 (IQR, 92-140) cmH2O, respectively. Nine patients had stomal leakage during the urodynamic investigation. In five patients, the detrusor leak point pressure (dLPP) was low (<20 cmH2O). A pressure peak at the beginning of SPP-2 was absent in all patients with stomal leakage at low dLPP.

CONCLUSION

SPP and CSP measurement in CCCs are feasible. We found differences in SPP-2 between patients with and without leakage at low dLPP, indicative of a role of the intravesical tunnel in continence or high dLPP. The results of this study may improve our understanding of the physiology and dynamics of CCCs as well as the management of CCC-related complications.

Research priorities for diagnostic instrumentation in urinary incontinence

The International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI) captures current evidence on incontinence. The conference 'Incontinence: The Engineering Challenge XIII' in November 2021 heard an update on the most recent ICI summary on urodynamic testing. This paper summarises the ICI recommendations for future research in urodynamics, with a view to informing engineers of issues and challenges that could benefit from engineering solutions. Engineers are encouraged to contribute to the following areas of research, which will have a direct and positive effect on patients' quality of life and overall health: (a) Urine flow measurement: home- and app-based devices, machine learning analysis of flow shape, (b) Pressure measurement: normal values for and validation of new technologies, including air-filled, non-invasive and urethral pressure reflectometry, (c) Ultrasound imaging: bladder wall biomechanics, bladder shape analysis, (d) Assess normal and abnormal value ranges, and diagnostic performance and (e) Specific trials in understudied patient groups including those with symptoms resistant to treatment, children and the frail elderly.

Comparison of Air-charged Catheter and Water-filled Catheter in Female Urethral Pressure Profile

OBJECTIVE

To compared the maximum urethral pressure (Pura@max) and functional urethral length (FUL) obtained with water-filled catheters and air-charged catheters during female urethral pressure profile (UPP) in a retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and five female patients were enrolled in our investigation. At Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, patients who had lower urinary tract dysfunction underwent UPP using a modified UPP equipment. In one UPP, both a water-filled catheter (WFC) and an air-charged catheter (ACC) were employed simultaneously. The paired t test was used to compare the differences between the two systems. Bias and correlations between the two systems were analyzed according to the American Clinical and Laboratory Standardization Institute (CLSI) EP9-A3 recommendations.

RESULTS

There were 105 female participants in this study. The patients were 55.5 ± 14.2years old on average. By using the ACC and WFC systems, the mean FUL was determined to be 39.7 ± 16.2 mm and 33.9 ± 13.9 mm, respectively. The FUL findings of two systems differed significantly from one another (P < .01), and a linear fit with R2 = 0.94 indicates a strong linear correlation. The findings of the maximum urethral pressure (Pura@max) measurements made by the ACC and WFC systems, respectively, were 134.3 ± 39.1cmH2O and 99.2 ± 27.6cmH2O, are substantially different (P < .01), and the linear fit R2 = 0.67. The Pura@max of two systems did not linearly correlate with one another.

CONCLUSION

For UPP, ACCs often provide higher readings than WFCs, and there is a significant difference in the readings between the two systems. The pressure values derived from the two systems do not correlate, although the FUL does have a significant linear correlation. Results from the ACC and WFC cannot be used interchangeably.

The bladder contractility and bladder outlet obstruction indices in adult women. Results of a global Delphi consensus study

AIMS

This Delphi study was planned to examine global expert consensus with regard to utility, accuracy, and categorization of the bladder contractility index (BCI), bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI), and the related evidence. This manuscript deals with adult women and follows a previous manuscript reporting on adult men.

METHODS

Twenty-nine experts were invited to answer the two-round survey including three foundation questions and 12 survey questions. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. The ordinal scale (0-10) in round 1 was classified into "strongly agree," "agree," "neutral," "disagree," and "strongly disagree" for the final round. A systematic search for evidence was conducted for therapeutic studies that have examined outcome stratified by the indices in women.

RESULTS

Eighteen experts participated in the survey with 100% completion. Consensus was noted with regard to 2 of 12 questions, both in the negative. The experts had a consensus that BOOI was neither accurate nor useful and a similar negative trend was noted with regard to BCI. However, there was support, short of consensus, for the utility on an index of bladder contractility and bladder outflow obstruction. Systematic search yielded eight publications pertaining to stress urinary incontinence (n = 6), pelvic organ prolapse (n = 1), and intra-sphincteric botulinum toxin (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Experts had significant concerns with regard to the use of the male BCI and BOOI in adult women despite a general recognition of the need for numerical indices of contractility and obstruction. Systematic search showed a striking lack of evidence in this regard.

Usability and safety of the new 5 French air-charged catheter for performing urodynamic studies on pediatric patients

AIMS

To assess the performance and safety of the T-DOC® 5 French air-charged urodynamic catheters in pediatric patients and obtain feedback from providers related to usability performance.

METHODS

Patients ages 12 years and younger undergoing urodynamics were prospectively recruited from two institutions. The T-DOC® 5 French air-charged catheters were used. Issues with catheter placement, adverse events (AEs), and pain scores were assessed. A follow-up telephone call was made to assess for post-urodynamic AEs. Providers completed a clinical user questionnaire. Likert scale was used (1 = most negative and 5 = most positive response) and reported in mean (range).

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients completed the study. The mean age was 55 months (5-130) (10 females, 18 males). One problem was noted with the insertion of an abdominal catheter, secondary to stool impaction. Catheters stayed in place on all subjects, except for one related to patient hyperactivity. There were no AEs during the studies. In total four reported post-urodynamics AEs (one hematochezia, three dysuria). Among nine patients, pain level on the bladder and abdominal insertion was 3.6/10 (0-10) and 3.1/10 (0-10). Five providers completed the questionnaire. The overall ease of use was rated 4.3/5 (3-5). The ease of insertion was 4.1/5 (2-5) and set-up/clean-up time was 4.4/5 (3-5). Tracing stability, subtraction accuracy, and artifact sensitivity were all perceived favorably (respectively 4.8/5 [4-5], 4.6/5 [4-5], and 4.4/5 [4-5]).

CONCLUSIONS

The T-DOC® 5 French air-charged catheter was considered safe and effective in pediatric patients. No AEs occurred during the studies. Providers, using the catheters, reported favorably on catheter usage.