Long-term outcomes of sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction: A 23-year experience

Electroacupuncture for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a condition commonly seen among men aged over 40, significantly affecting their quality of life and typically accompanied by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Acupuncture presents a potentially effective treatment option; however, the exact effects remain uncertain. Therefore, we design this multicentre randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) for relieving LUTS in men with BPH.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A two-arm, sham-controlled, subject-blinded and assessor-blinded trial will be conducted in 11 hospitals in China to compare EA with sham electroacupuncture (SA) in treating moderate to severe LUTS of BPH among men aged 40-80. A total of 306 eligible male patients will be recruited and assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive either EA or SA for 24 sessions over a succession of 8 weeks, with 24 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome will be the proportions of participants with at least 30% reduction in the International Prostate Symptom Score total score from baseline at weeks 8 and 20. All statistical analyses will be conducted in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle, and a two-tailed p value less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has been approved by the institutional review board of Guang'anmen Hospital (2022-203-KY), as well as other recruitment centres. Each participant will receive the detailed information of the trial, and sign the written informed consent. The results of the trial are expected to be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05585450.

Preliminary analysis of stimulation parameters for sacral neuromodulation in different indications: a multicenter retrospective cohort study from China

BACKGROUND

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective approach for treating lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD), and stimulation programming is essential for successful treatment. However, research on SNM programming for various indications is limited. Thus, the authors aimed to determine whether there were differences in the stimulation parameters for different SNM indications and the appropriate programming recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients with LUTD who underwent SNM and completed internal pulse generator implantation. The parameters with the highest patient satisfaction or the most symptom improvement during the test period were considered optimal and used to set the programming after internal pulse generator implantation.

RESULTS

After screening, 282 patients were enrolled and categorized into four groups based on the following indications: refractory overactive bladder (OAB) ( n =61), neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (nLUTD) ( n =162), interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/BPS) ( n =24), and idiopathic nonobstructive urinary retention (NOUR) ( n =35). When analyzing the optimal stimulus parameters, disparities in the stimulation amplitude and pulse frequency were noted among the four groups. The stimulation amplitude in the nLUTD group was higher than that in the idiopathic NOUR group ( P =0.013). Differences in pulse frequency were observed between the refractory OAB and nLUTD groups ( P <0.001) and between the refractory OAB and idiopathic NOUR groups ( P =0.001). No differences in the electrode configuration or pulse width settings existed among the four groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The stimulation parameters for SNM varied among the different indications. For the initial programming of stage I, most patients are recommended to start with stimulation amplitudes below 2 V, although patients with nLUTD may benefit from higher amplitudes. A standard pulse width of 210 μs is recommended for all patients. However, for individuals experiencing nLUTD or idiopathic NOUR, the pulse frequency can begin above the standard 14 Hz but not exceed 50 Hz.

Current position of neuromodulation for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite established effectiveness in overactive bladder and nonobstructive retention, neuromodulation's application in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) remains a topic of ongoing research. The purpose of this article is to review recent developments in neuromodulation as treatment of IC/BPS offering guidance for healthcare practitioners dealing with IC/BPS cases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research underlines the promising role of sacral, tibial and pudendal neuromodulation in management of IC/BPS symptoms. Studies reveal encouraging outcomes, particularly in alleviating urgency and frequency symptoms. However, while urgency and frequency symptoms tend to improve, comprehensive pain relief remains a challenge. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) stand out due to their minimal invasive nature. Existing literature points to the need for larger prospective studies with extended follow-up periods to validate the efficacy and sustainability of neuromodulation.

SUMMARY

Neuromodulation is a promising treatment modality for refractory IC/BPS. Due to the minimal invasive nature, they should be tried before rigorous surgery. However, the limited quantity of available data and the variability in pain relief outcomes necessitate cautious interpretation. The review emphasizes the need for further research.

Understanding a decade of safety reporting for sacral neuromodulation in the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database

INTRODUCTION

Over 350 000 sacral neuromodulation (SNM) devices have been implanted since approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1998. SNM technology and clinical applications have evolved, with minimal safety updates after initial trials. We aim to provide an updated overview of real-world SNM safety. These insights will guide informed consent, preoperative counseling, and patient expectation-setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database is a repository for medical device safety reports. We performed MAUDE categorical (1/1/98-12/31/10) and keyword (1/1/11-9/30/21) searches for "Interstim." A random sample of 1000 reports was reviewed and categorized by theme. To corroborate our MAUDE database analysis, a legal librarian searched the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) database, as well as Bloomberg Law's dockets database for all lawsuits related to SNM devices.

RESULTS

Our search of the MAUDE database returned 44 122 SNM-related adverse events (AEs). The figure illustrates the prevalence of event categories in the random sample. The largest proportion of reports (25.6%) related to a patient's need for assistance with device use, followed by loss/change of efficacy (19.0%). Interestingly, a fall preceded issue onset in 32% of non-shock pain, 30% of lead/device migration, and 27% of painful shock reports. Our legal search revealed only four lawsuits: one for patient complications after an SNM device was used off-label, one case of transverse myelitis after implant, one for device migration or poor placement, and the fourth claimed the device malfunctioned requiring removal and causing permanent injury.

CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms the real-world safety of SNM devices and very low complication rates as seen in the original clinical trials. Our findings indicate that 43.2% (95% confidence interval 40.1%-46.3%) of SNM "complications" are not AEs, per se, but rather reflect a need for improved technical support or more comprehensive informed consent to convey known device limitations to the patient, such as battery life. Similarly, the number of lawsuits is shockingly low for a device that has been in the market for 24 years, reinforcing the safety of the device. Legal cases involving SNM devices seem to relate to inappropriate patient selection-including at least one case in which SNM was used for a non-FDA approved indication-lack of appropriate follow-up, and/or provider inability to assist the patient with utilizing the device after implantation.

Treating and Managing Urinary Incontinence: Evolving and Potential Multicomponent Medical and Lifestyle Interventions

Incontinence is defined by either ICS 2002 or IUGA/ICS 2010 as the involuntary loss of urine and includes urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). It has a high worldwide prevalence with an associated impact on quality of life. Despite existing management options for the management of urinary incontinence, patients continue to be troubled by symptoms or side effects of existing treatment. There is therefore a requirement for ongoing research into treatment options for the management of UUI and SUI, that are more effective and tolerable to patients. Advances in treatment of UUI include a more selective beta 3 agonist, Vibegron, which has less impact on cardiac function than Mirabegron. Hormonal treatment, including Ospemifene and Prasterone, may improve GSM and in turn symptoms of UUI. There are advances in the types of neuromodulators available, including those that are rechargeable at home and are MRI safe. Laser has shown promising initial results. There is developing interest in the microbiome, and how this may impact future treatment modalities. Advances in treatment of SUI include the use of mobile health applications to support delivery of pelvic floor muscle training. Litoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, has shown promising results at phase III trials. Functional magnetic stimulation is being developed to improve contractility of pelvic floor muscles. We also discuss interventions that improve tissue elasticity and regeneration, such as platelet rich plasma, autologous stem cell transplantation, laser therapy and radiofrequency treatment, which show short term benefits.

Sacral neuromodulation in the management of chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a treatment approved for use in several conditions including refractory overactive bladder (OAB) and voiding dysfunction. Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a debilitating condition for which treatment is often challenging. SNM shows promising effect in patients with refractory CPP. However, there is a lack of clear evidence, especially in long-term outcomes. This systematic review will assess outcomes of SNM for treating CPP.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central and clinical trial databases was completed from database inception until January 14, 2022. Studies using original data investigating SNM in an adult population with CPP which recorded pre and posttreatment pain scores were selected. Primary outcome was numerical change in pain score. Secondary outcomes were quality of life assessment and change in medication use and all-time complications of SNM. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Tool for cohort studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-six of 1026 identified articles were selected evaluating 853 patients with CPP. The implantation rate after test-phase success was 64.3%. Significant improvement of pain scores was reported in 13 studies; three studies reported no significant change. WMD in pain scores on a 10-point scale was -4.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -5.32 to -3.95, p < 0.00001) across 20 studies which were quantitatively synthesized: effects were maintained at long-term follow-up. Mean follow-up was 42.5 months (0-59). Quality of life was measured by RAND SF-36 and EQ-5D questionnaires and all studies reported improvement in quality of life. One hundred and eighty-nine complications were reported in 1555 patients (Clavien-Dindo Grade I-IIIb). Risk of bias ranged from low to high risk. Studies were case series and bias stemmed from selection bias and loss to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Sacral Neuromodulation is a reasonably effective treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain and significantly reduces pain and increases patients' quality of life with immediate to long-term effects.

[Therapeutic value of neuromodulation in women]

BACKGROUND

Neuromodulative treatment for the treatment of overactive bladder has been used in clinical practice since its introduction in the early 1980s.

OBJECTIVES

Description and update of the various neuromodulative techniques (tibial nerve stimulation, sacral and pudendal neuromodulation), presentation of their effectiveness and safety, and evaluation of their evidence for clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature search in PubMed and Embase, inclusion of studies according to the following criteria: evidence level, timeliness, length of follow-up and number of female patients according to the author's preference.

RESULTS

The efficacy and safety of both percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) and sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been proven by studies with an evidence level of 1. Long-term data of up to 20 years are available for SNM, while long-term data for PTNS are limited. Permanent implants for tibial nerve stimulation are promising new developments. Pudendal neuromodulation (PNM) is suitable for more complex indications but is surgically more challenging.

CONCLUSIONS

Both PTNS and SNM are suitable for broad application in clinical practice. PTNS can be offered as an alternative to pharmacotherapy, while SNM provides the most convincing clinical data of all neuromodulative therapies.

Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction

Over the years, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become an established and effective treatment for chronic urinary system retention and incontinence. The process of SNM is performed in two stages, the first is an evaluation phase and the second an implant phase. This study aimed to assess the rate of failure of progression from the evaluation to the implantation stage and the factors predicting the outcome of this commonplace procedure.

Materials and methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study took place at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All the patients who underwent SNM implantation from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2021 were included. Patients younger than 14 years and patients who had the SNM implantation in a different hospital and were only followed-up at KAMC were excluded. Patient-related information were extracted from the BESTCare system. Frequency and percentage were used for the categorical variables, and the mean, median, and standard deviation to display the continuous variables. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to test for the association of the categorical variables.

Results

Among 28 patients, 46.4% (n=13) failed to progress from the evaluation phase to the implantation phase. Gender, age, having a co-morbidity, and SNM indication were not significant factors for predicting the outcome of the SNM evaluation phase.

Conclusion

The observed failure rate was marginally higher than the ones detected in other studies. Although no significant association was detected between evaluation stage failure and the assigned predictors, the results need to be interpreted with caution due to the small population size. Larger multicenter studies need to be done in order to investigate the link between patient characteristics and the efficacy of SNM. Establishing a concrete evidence would further refine the targeted patient population and indications for SNM.

Update on the management of overactive bladder

Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is a common condition characterised by urinary urgency, with or without urgency incontinence, frequency and nocturia, in the absence of any other pathology. Clinical diagnosis is based upon patient self-reported symptomology. Currently there is a plethora of treatments available for the management of OAB. Clinical guidelines suggest treatment via a multidisciplinary pathway including behavioural therapy and pharmacotherapy, which can be commenced in primary care, with referral to specialist services in those patients refractory to these treatments. Intradetrusor botulinum A and sacral neuromodulation provide safe and efficacious management of refractory OAB. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and augmentation cystoplasty remain available and efficacious in a select group of patients. Unfortunately, there remains a high rate of patient dissatisfaction and discontinuation in all treatments and thus there remains a need for emerging therapies in the management of OAB.