Long-term survivors of childhood bone and soft tissue sarcomas are at risk of hospitalization

Risk of late health effects after soft-tissue sarcomas in childhood - a population-based cohort study within the Adult Life after Childhood Cancer in Scandinavia research programme

BACKGROUND

In the 1960s only 1/3 of children with soft-tissue sarcomas survived, however with improved treatments survival today has reached 70%. Given the previous poor survival and the rarity of soft-tissue sarcomas, the risk of somatic late effects in a large cohort of Nordic soft-tissue sarcoma survivors has not yet been assessed.

METHODS

In this population-based cohort study we identified 985 five-year soft-tissue sarcoma survivors in Nordic nationwide cancer registries and late effects in national hospital registries covering the period 1964-2012. Information on tumour site and radiotherapy was available for Danish and Finnish survivors (N = 531). Using disease-specific rates of first-time hospital contacts for somatic diseases in survivors and in 4,830 matched comparisons we calculated relative rates (RR) and rate differences (RD).

RESULTS

Survivors had a RR of 1.5 (95% CI 1.4-1.7) and an absolute RD of 23.5 (17.7-29.2) for a first hospital contact per 1,000 person-years. The highest risks in both relative and absolute terms were of endocrine disorders (RR = 2.5; RD = 7.6), and diseases of the nervous system (RR = 1.9; RD = 6.6), digestive organs (RR = 1.7; RD = 5.4) and urinary system (RR = 1.7; RD = 5.6). By tumour site, excess risk was lower after extremity tumours. Irradiated survivors had a 2.6 (1.2-5.9) times higher risk than non-irradiated.

CONCLUSIONS

Soft-tissue sarcoma survivors have an increased risk of somatic late effects in 5 out of 10 main diagnostic groups of diseases, and the risk remains increased up to 40 years after cancer diagnosis. Risks were slightly lower for those treated for tumours in the extremities, and radiotherapy increased the risk by more than two-fold.

Transgenerational effects of chemotherapy: Both male and female children born to women exposed to chemotherapy have fewer children

BACKGROUND

There is little known about the transgenerational effect of chemotherapy. For example, chemotherapy is known to decrease fecundity in women. But if women are able to have offspring after chemotherapy exposure, do these children also have decreased fecundity?

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Utah Population Database (UPDB), a comprehensive resource that links birth, medical, death and cancer records for individuals in the state of Utah. The male and female children (F1 generation) of chemotherapy-exposed women (F0 generation) were identified. The number of live births (F2 generation) to this F1 generation was compared to two sets of chemotherapy-unexposed, matched controls using conditional Poisson regression models (regression coefficient, 95% confidence interval, P-value). The first unexposed was established using the general population and the second unexposed was established using first cousins to the F1 generation.

RESULTS

The exposed F1 individuals had 77.2% fewer children (-1.48; -2.51 to -0.70; p = 0.001) relative to the unexposed general population. F1 males had 86.9% fewer children (-2.03; -4.91 to -0.51; p = 0.005) and F1 females had 70.5% fewer children (-1.22; -2.40 to -0.36; p = 0.016). When comparing to their unexposed cousins, the F1 generation (both sexes combined) had 74.3% (-1.36; -2.82 to -0.29; p = 0.029) fewer children.

CONCLUSION

The sons and daughters (F1 generation) of chemotherapy-exposed women have fewer live births when compared to both matched, unexposed general population and cousin controls. Chemotherapy may have a transgenerational effect in exposed women which needs further investigation.

Elevated visual dependency in young adults after chemotherapy in childhood

Chemotherapy in childhood can result in long-term neurophysiological side-effects, which could extend to visual processing, specifically the degree to which a person relies on vision to determine vertical and horizontal (visual dependency). We investigated whether adults treated with chemotherapy in childhood experience elevated visual dependency compared to controls and whether any difference is associated with the age at which subjects were treated. Visual dependency was measured in 23 subjects (mean age 25.3 years) treated in childhood with chemotherapy (CTS) for malignant, solid, non-CNS tumors. We also stratified CTS into two groups: those treated before 12 years of age and those treated from 12 years of age and older. Results were compared to 25 healthy, age-matched controls. The subjective visual horizontal (SVH) and vertical (SVV) orientations was recorded by having subjects position an illuminated rod to their perceived horizontal and vertical with and without a surrounding frame tilted clockwise and counter-clockwise 20° from vertical. There was no significant difference in rod accuracy between any CTS groups and controls without a frame. However, when assessing visual dependency using a frame, CTS in general (p = 0.006) and especially CTS treated before 12 years of age (p = 0.001) tilted the rod significantly further in the direction of the frame compared to controls. Our findings suggest that chemotherapy treatment before 12 years of age is associated with elevated visual dependency compared to controls, implying a visual bias during spatial activities. Clinicians should be aware of symptoms such as visual vertigo in adults treated with chemotherapy in childhood.