Implementation science in pediatric oncology: A narrative review and future directions

Clinical practice guideline-inconsistent management of fever and neutropenia in pediatric oncology: A Children's Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

The primary objective was to measure the proportion of episodes where care delivery was inconsistent with selected recommendations of a clinical practice guideline (CPG) on fever and neutropenia (FN) management. The influence of site size on CPG-inconsistent care delivery, and association between patient outcomes and CPG-inconsistent care were described.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study included patients less than 21 years old with cancer who were at high risk of poor FN outcomes and were previously enrolled to a Children's Oncology Group (COG) study at participating National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) institutions from January 2014 through December 2015. Patients were randomly selected for chart review by participating sites from a COG-generated list. Care delivered in each episode was adjudicated (CPG-consistent or CPG-inconsistent) against each of five selected recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients from 22 sites, representing 157 FN episodes, were included. The most common CPG-inconsistent care delivered was omission of pulmonary computerized tomography in patients with persistent FN (60.3%). Of 74 episodes where assessment of four (episodes without persistent FN) or five (episodes with persistent FN) recommendations was possible, CPG-inconsistent care was delivered with respect to at least one recommendation in 63 (85%) episodes. Site size was not associated with CPG-inconsistent care delivery. No statistically significant association between CPG-inconsistent care and fever recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of pediatric patients at high risk of poor FN outcomes, CPG-inconsistent care was common. Opportunities to optimize resource stewardship by boosting supportive care CPG implementation are highlighted.

Oculomotor Impairments in Children After Posterior Fossa Tumors Treatment

Posterior fossa tumors (PFT) are the most common pediatric brain tumors, and the study of the somatic and cognitive status of PFT survivors still remains a critical problem. Since cerebellar damage can affect eye movement centers located in the vermis and hemispheres, such patients suffer from disturbances in visual perception, visual-spatial functions, reading, etc. Our investigation aimed at describing oculomotor impairments in PFT survivors linked to core oculomotor functions assessed through eye tracking method: gaze holding, reflexive saccades, and organization of voluntary saccades and their dependency on age at tumor diagnosis. Also, we investigated the relationship between oculomotor functions and ataxia measured with International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). A total of 110 children (patients and age-matched healthy controls, aged 9-17 years old) participated in the study. We found that the earlier the child had a tumor, the more impaired gaze holding (p = 0.0031) and fewer isometric saccades (p = 0.035) were observed at the time of examination. The above-mentioned functions in healthy controls improved with age. Visual scanning was also impaired compared to controls but was not related to age at diagnosis. A positive correlation between ICARS scores and number of hypermetric saccades (r = 0.309, p = 0.039), but no correlation with the number of hypometric saccades (r = - 0.008, p = 0.956). Furthermore, number of hypometric saccades did not differ between patients and controls (p = 0.238). Thus, primarily hypermetric saccades can be considered a prominent oculomotor symptom of cerebellar tumors. Our study provides basis for new methods of PFT diagnosis and rehabilitation procedure evaluation, both playing essential roles in modern pediatric neurooncology.

Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors-Opportunity to Address Gaps in Cancer Prevention and Survivorship

The risks of secondary cancers associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are as much as three times higher for survivors of pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer (PYAC) compared to the general population. Despite this, HPV vaccination rates among PYAC survivors remain low. Whereas pediatric oncology providers endorse HPV vaccination of PYAC survivors, many lack the resources or opportunities to intervene. The responsibility of HPV vaccination, therefore, falls to primary care providers and practices. This article provides an overview of the challenges with HPV vaccination that are distinct to PYAC survivors and discusses potential strategies to increase HPV vaccine coverage in this population.

Examining the Barriers and Opportunities for Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Delivery in Cancer Care Settings: A Mixed-Methods Study

Although pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (PAYA) cancer survivors are at increased risks for secondary cancers, their HPV vaccine uptake rates are poor. Therefore, we conducted a mixed-methods study to identify the barriers and opportunities for HPV vaccine delivery among PAYA cancer care providers. We distributed a semistructured questionnaire to a professional organization comprised of PAYA oncology and hematology healthcare providers between April and July 2022. Questionnaire measures included demographic and practice characteristics, HPV vaccine knowledge, willingness, barriers, opportunities, and roles for HPV vaccine delivery. Descriptive characteristics were generated for quantitative data, and content analysis was used to identify themes. A total of 49 providers responded to our survey. A majority were female (68%) and non-Hispanic white (74%). Approximately 76% were oncology or hematology physicians, and most worked in a cancer center or children's hospital (86%). Over half (63%) had been practicing for >15 years, and a majority saw patients ages 11 to 17. Although less than half reported discussing HPV vaccination with their patients, 69% were willing to become involved in HPV vaccine delivery. The most frequently reported barriers identified in our content analysis were related to system-level factors. Furthermore, providers identified opportunities within cancer prevention education, transitions in care, and at the system-level. Although barriers to HPV vaccination persist in cancer care, most providers perceived there to be opportunities to become involved in HPV vaccine delivery. Identifying strategies for PAYA oncology and hematology healthcare providers to adopt a stronger role in HPV vaccination remains a significant opportunity for future implementation research.

PREVENTION RELEVANCE

This mixed-methods study is the first to investigate and assess barriers and opportunities for HPV vaccine delivery among PAYA cancer healthcare providers. Our findings can serve as an important framework for future implementation research targeted towards HPV vaccine delivery in cancer clinical settings. See related Spotlight, p. 545.