Detection of rubella virus in fetal and placental tissues and in the throats of neonates after serologically confirmed rubella in pregnancy

Prenatal diagnosis of rubella virus infection by direct detection and semiquantitation of viral RNA in clinical samples by reverse transcription-PCR

A reverse transcription-nested PCR (RT-nPCR) method for prenatal diagnosis of rubella virus (RV) infection was developed. In the first step of RT-nPCR a synthetic RNA molecule (pRRV) differing from the RV target sequence by having a 21-nucleotide insertion was used as the internal control of amplification for the detection of PCR inhibitors. In addition, comparison of pRRV and RV-specific PCR signals allowed for the semiquantitation of RV input target sequences (range, 10 to > and = 1,000 RV genomes). In parallel, a complete RT-nPCR assay was performed with the same samples in the absence of the internal control to confirm the results of the first step and to detect RV RNA-positive samples containing < 10 RV genomes. Subsequently, the RT-nPCR method was used to examine retrospectively clinical samples (direct RT-nPCR) from eight congenitally infected and eight uninfected fetuses for RV RNA. RT-nPCR was also used to detect RV RNA in cell cultures (culture-RT-nPCR) 96 h after inoculation with the same specimens. With amniotic fluid (AF) samples, direct RT-nPCR identified eight of eight cases of RV transmission (sensitivity, 100%), whereas culture-RT-nPCR and virus isolation detected only six of eight cases (sensitivity, 75%). However, when the culture-RT-nPCR results were positive, culture-RT-nPCR confirmed the direct RT-nPCR results 3 days to 3 weeks earlier than virus isolation. The specificity of direct RT-nPCR was 100%, with eight of eight uninfected fetuses being negative. Semiquantitation showed only small amounts (< and = 100 copies) of viral RNA in clinical samples. In conclusion, direct RT-nPCR with AF samples (i) shows 100% sensitivity and specificity for prenatal diagnosis of RV infection and (ii) is a rapid technique, giving results in 24 to 48 h after sampling.

Use of PCR for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of congenital rubella

A reverse transcription-nested PCR assay (RT-PCR) was evaluated for diagnosis of congenitally acquired rubella in utero and during infancy. RT-PCR was compared with virus isolation for retrospective detection of rubella virus in placental and fetal tissues obtained after termination of pregnancy following primary rubella or rubella virus reinfection. Concordant results were obtained for 85% of samples; rubella virus RNA was detected by RT-PCR alone in four samples, and rubella virus was detected by isolation alone in two samples. Samples were also obtained for prenatal diagnosis of congenital infection; rubella virus RNA was detected in three of seven chorionic villus samples and one of three amniotic fluid samples by RT-PCR, while rubella virus was isolated in only one chorionic villus sample. To demonstrate that the RNA extracted from chorionic villus samples contained amplifiable RNA, a nested RT-PCR was used to detect keratin mRNA. Rubella virus was detected in placenta in two cases in which the fetus was uninfected, and there was no evidence of rubella virus in the placenta from one case in which the fetus was infected. Thus, detection of rubella virus in chorionic villus samples by RT-PCR may not always correctly predict fetal rubella virus infection. RT-PCR was successfully used for the diagnosis of congenitally acquired rubella in infancy. Rubella virus RNA was detected in cyropreserved or formalin-fixed lens aspirates obtained from infants in India with serologically confirmed congenital rubella but not in samples from controls with inherited cataract.

The diagnosis of congenital infections: contemporary strategies

Congenital infections remain an important source of neurologic, ophthalmologic, and audiologic disability for thousands of children throughout the world. This review summarizes the clinical features and describes contemporary approaches to the microbiologic diagnosis of congenital infections. In particular, this review emphasizes the important roles that molecular methods, especially the polymerase chain reaction, have in detecting the many infectious agents capable of damaging the developing nervous system.

PCR for detection of rubella virus RNA in clinical samples

A reverse transcription nested PCR (RT-PCR) assay for the detection of rubella virus RNA using primers from the E1 open reading frame was established. This assay was found to be sensitive (detecting approximately two synthetic RNA copies and RNA extracted from 0.1 50% tissue culture infective dose of rubella virus) and specific; five wild-type rubella strains and four vaccine strains were detected, and no nonspecific amplification of 16 other RNA viruses or RNAs from seven cell types occurred. Rubella virus RNA was detected in 12 pharyngeal swabs from patients with serologically confirmed rubella; these RT-PCR results were in complete agreement with virus isolation. Analysis of products of conception obtained after confirmed primary maternal rubella infection by RT-PCR gave 92% agreement (12 of 13 samples) with virus isolation. No false-positive results were obtained. The potential use of this assay for prenatal diagnosis of congenital rubella infection and for investigating aspects of the pathogenesis of chronic disease is discussed.

Congenital infections and the nervous system

Despite vaccines, new antimicrobials, and improved hygienic practices, congenital infections remain an important cause of death and long-term neurologic morbidity among infants world-wide. Important agents include Toxoplasma gondii, cytomegalovirus, Treponema pallidum, herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2, and rubella virus. In addition, several other agents, such as the varicella zoster virus, human parvovirus B19, and Borrelia burgdorferi, can potentially infect the fetus and cause adverse fetal outcomes. This article provides an overview of these infectious disorders and outlines current strategies for acute treatment and long-term management.

Laboratory diagnosis of rubella: past, present and future

Fifty years ago in New South Wales the late Sir Norman Gregg [1] described congenital cataracts in 78 babies, 67 of whose mothers had had clinical rubella in early pregnancy; he concluded that the disease in the mother caused the abnormality in the baby. Gregg [1–3] and Swan [4, 5] and their colleagues reported that deafness, heart disease and microcephaly were also major components of the congenital rubella syndrome. The need to prevent this tragic outcome stimulated intensive work on laboratory diagnosis and vaccine development, leading to the isolation of rubella virus in 1962 and then to methods for antibody detection. These complementary advances established the two traditional pillars of virological diagnosis and opened the way to immunization, with the result that some countries are now on the verge of eliminating a disease which for over 100 years was regarded as no more than a mild and harmless exanthem of childhood.