1
|
Wong HYC, Asim S, Feng Q, Fu SXH, Sahota DS, So PL, Dong D. Effectiveness of Interactive Digital Decision Aids in Prenatal Screening Decision-making: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e37953. [PMID: 36917146 PMCID: PMC10131906 DOI: 10.2196/37953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing prenatal screening options and limited consultation time have made it difficult for pregnant women to participate in shared decision-making. Interactive digital decision aids (IDDAs) could integrate interactive technology into health care to a facilitate higher-quality decision-making process. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of IDDAs on pregnant women's decision-making regarding prenatal screening. METHODS We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Google Scholar, and reference lists of included studies until August 2021. We included the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the use of IDDAs (fulfilling basic criteria of International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration and these were interactive and digital) as an adjunct to standard care with standard care alone and involved pregnant women themselves in prenatal screening decision-making. Data on primary outcomes, that is, knowledge and decisional conflict, and secondary outcomes were extracted, and meta-analyses were conducted based on standardized mean differences (SMDs). Subgroup analysis based on knowledge was performed. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for risk-of-bias assessment. RESULTS Eight RCTs were identified from 10,283 references, of which 7 were included in quantitative synthesis. Analyses showed that IDDAs increased knowledge (SMD 0.58, 95% CI 0.26-0.90) and decreased decisional conflict (SMD -0.15, 95% CI -0.25 to -0.05). Substantial heterogeneity in knowledge was identified, which could not be completely resolved through subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS IDDAs can improve certain aspects of decision-making in prenatal screening among pregnant women, but the results require cautious interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Yat Conrad Wong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.,Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Saba Asim
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Qi Feng
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sherry Xiao-Hong Fu
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Daljit Singh Sahota
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Po Lam So
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong
| | - Dong Dong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.,Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Decision Support Needs for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Youth and Families: A Patient-Centered Needs Assessment. J Adolesc Health 2023; 72:452-459. [PMID: 36535868 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Due to the intertwining of medical and social decision-making, new approaches to shared decision-making are likely needed for supporting decisions related to the care of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) adolescents. Prior to developing decision support interventions for TGD youth, a decision support needs assessment must be completed. METHODS Self-identified TGD youth, family members of TGD youth, clinicians caring for this population, and community advocates participated in one of six group level assessments (GLAs). GLA is a structured, participatory qualitative method that engages diverse groups of stakeholders in generating and evaluating ideas on the topic of interest. Upon completion of all GLAs, a survey was developed and distributed to GLA participants inviting them to rank ideas generated during the GLAs. RESULTS Six major themes emerged from the GLAs regarding decision support needs, including: improving healthcare provider skills and education, increasing access to support outside the healthcare system, strengthening community and societal support, developing special information resources, supporting youth in leading decision-making about transition, and modifying the healthcare system. In the follow-up survey, improving healthcare provider skills and education was the most commonly chosen top priority. DISCUSSION Participants identified decision support needs for TGD youth and their families that were mostly distinct from traditional decision support approaches. Participants' focus on the need to improve healthcare provider skills and education provides an opportunity to couple gender-focused education with shared decision-making skills, an approach that may be more sustainable than tools for specific decisions.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bujold M, Pluye P, Légaré F. Decision-making and related outcomes of patients with complex care needs in primary care settings: a systematic literature review with a case-based qualitative synthesis. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:279. [PMID: 36352376 PMCID: PMC9644584 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01879-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In primary care, patients increasingly face difficult decisions related to complex care needs (multimorbidity, polypharmacy, mental health issues, social vulnerability and structural barriers). There is a need for a pragmatic conceptual model to understand decisional needs among patients with complex care needs and outcomes related to decision. We aimed to identify types of decisional needs among patients with complex care needs, and decision-making configurations of conditions associated with decision outcomes. METHODS We conducted a systematic mixed studies review. Two specialized librarians searched five bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and SSCI). The search strategy was conducted from inception to December 2017. A team of twenty crowd-reviewers selected empirical studies on: (1) patients with complex care needs; (2) decisional needs; (3) primary care. Two reviewers appraised the quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We conducted a 2-phase case-based qualitative synthesis framed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and Gregor's explicative-predictive theory type. A decisional need case involved: (a) a decision (what), (b) concerning a patient with complex care needs with bio-psycho-social characteristics (who), (c) made independently or in partnership (how), (d) in a specific place and time (where/when), (e) with communication and coordination barriers or facilitators (why), and that (f) influenced actions taken, health or well-being, or decision quality (outcomes). RESULTS We included 47 studies. Data sufficiency qualitative criterion was reached. We identified 69 cases (2997 participants across 13 countries) grouped into five types of decisional needs: 'prioritization' (n = 26), 'use of services' (n = 22), 'prescription' (n = 12), 'behavior change' (n = 4) and 'institutionalization' (n = 5). Many decisions were made between clinical encounters in situations of social vulnerability. Patterns of conditions associated with decision outcomes revealed four decision-making configurations: 'well-managed' (n = 13), 'asymmetric encounters' (n = 21), 'self-management by default' (n = 8), and 'chaotic' (n = 27). Shared decision-making was associated with positive outcomes. Negative outcomes were associated with independent decision-making. CONCLUSION Our results could extend decision-making models in primary care settings and inform subsequent user-centered design of decision support tools for heterogenous patients with complex care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Bujold
- Department of Management, Evaluation and Health Policy, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Pierre Pluye
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Agbadje TT, Pilon C, Bérubé P, Forest JC, Rousseau F, Rahimi SA, Giguère Y, Légaré F. User Experience of a Computer-Based Decision Aid for Prenatal Trisomy Screening: Mixed Methods Explanatory Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2022; 5:e35381. [PMID: 35896164 PMCID: PMC9490528 DOI: 10.2196/35381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile health tools can support shared decision-making. We developed a computer-based decision aid (DA) to help pregnant women and their partners make informed, value-congruent decisions regarding prenatal screening for trisomy. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the usability and usefulness of computer-based DA among pregnant women, clinicians, and policy makers. METHODS For this mixed methods sequential explanatory study, we planned to recruit a convenience sample of 45 pregnant women, 45 clinicians from 3 clinical sites, and 15 policy makers. Eligible women were aged >18 years and >16 weeks pregnant or had recently given birth. Eligible clinicians and policy makers were involved in prenatal care. We asked the participants to navigate a computer-based DA. We asked the women about the usefulness of the DA and their self-confidence in decision-making. We asked all participants about usability, quality, acceptability, satisfaction with the content of the DA, and collected sociodemographic data. We explored participants' reactions to the computer-based DA and solicited suggestions. Our interview guide was based on the Mobile App Rating Scale. We performed descriptive analyses of the quantitative data and thematic deductive and inductive analyses of the qualitative data for each participant category. RESULTS A total of 45 pregnant women, 14 clinicians, and 8 policy makers participated. Most pregnant women were aged between 25 and 34 years (34/45, 75%) and White (42/45, 94%). Most clinicians were aged between 35 and 44 years (5/14, 36%) and women (11/14, 79%), and all were White (14/14, 100%); the largest proportion of policy makers was aged between 45 and 54 years (4/8, 50%), women (5/8, 62%), and White (8/8, 100%). The mean usefulness score for preparing for decision-making for women was 80/100 (SD 13), and the mean self-efficacy score was 88/100 (SD 11). The mean usability score was 84/100 (SD 14) for pregnant women, 77/100 (SD 14) for clinicians, and 79/100 (SD 23) for policy makers. The mean global score for quality was 80/100 (SD 9) for pregnant women, 72/100 (SD 12) for clinicians, and 80/100 (SD 9) for policy makers. Regarding acceptability, participants found the amount of information just right (52/66, 79%), balanced (58/66, 88%), useful (38/66, 58%), and sufficient (50/66, 76%). The mean satisfaction score with the content was 84/100 (SD 13) for pregnant women, 73/100 (SD 16) for clinicians, and 73/100 (SD 20) for policy makers. Participants thought the DA could be more engaging (eg, more customizable) and suggested strategies for implementation, such as incorporating it into clinical guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Pregnant women, clinicians, and policy makers found the DA usable and useful. The next steps are to incorporate user suggestions for improving engagement and implementing the computer-based DA in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Chantale Pilon
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | | | - Jean-Claude Forest
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry, and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - François Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry, and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Yves Giguère
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry, and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Agbadje TT, Rahimi SA, Côté M, Tremblay AA, Diallo MP, Elidor H, Herron AP, Djade CD, Légaré F. Evaluation of a prenatal screening decision aid: A mixed methods pilot study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:474-485. [PMID: 34088585 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We developed a decision aid (DA) to help pregnant women and their partners make informed decisions about prenatal screening for trisomy. We aimed to determine its usefulness for preparing for decision-making and its acceptability among end-users. METHODS In this mixed-methods pilot study, we recruited participants in three prenatal care settings in Quebec City. Eligible women were over 18 and more than 16 weeks pregnant or had given birth recently. We asked them about the usefulness of the DA using an interview grid based on the Technology Acceptance Model. We performed descriptive statistics and deductive analysis. RESULTS Thirty-nine dyads or individuals participated in the study. Mean usefulness score was 86.2 ± 13. Most participants found the amount of information in the DA just right (79.5%), balanced (89.7%), and very useful (61.5%). They were less satisfied with the presentation and the values worksheet and suggested different values clarification methods. CONCLUSION Rigorous pilot tests of DAs with patients are an important stage in their development before the more formal assessments that precede scaling up the DA in clinical practice. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The next version of the DA will integrate the suggestions of end-users for better decision-making processes about prenatal screening for trisomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mélissa Côté
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Andrée-Anne Tremblay
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Mariama Penda Diallo
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Hélène Elidor
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Alex Poulin Herron
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Quebec, QC, Canada; Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Codjo Djignefa Djade
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Quebec, QC, Canada; Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec, QC, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Poulin Herron A, Agbadje TT, Guay-Bélanger S, Ngueta G, Roch G, Rousseau F, Légaré F. Web-Based Training for Nurses on Using a Decision Aid to Support Shared Decision Making about Prenatal Screening: a Controlled Trial. JMIR Nurs 2021; 5:e31380. [PMID: 34874274 PMCID: PMC8826152 DOI: 10.2196/31380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nurses play an important role in supporting pregnant women making decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome. We developed a web-based shared decision-making (SDM) training program for health professionals focusing on Down syndrome screening decisions. Objective In this study, we aim to assess the impact of an SDM training program on nurses’ intention to use a decision aid with pregnant women deciding on prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Methods In this 2-arm, parallel controlled trial, French-speaking nurses working with pregnant women in the province of Quebec were recruited by a private survey firm. They were allocated by convenience either to the intervention group (web-based SDM course that included prenatal screening) or to the control group (web-based course focusing on prenatal screening alone, with no SDM content). The primary outcome was the intention to use a decision aid. Secondary outcomes were psychosocial variables of intention, knowledge, satisfaction, acceptability, perceived usefulness, and reaction to the pedagogical approach. All outcomes were self-assessed through web-based questionnaires, including the space for written comments. We used 2-tailed Student t test and Fisher exact test to compare continuous and categorical variables between groups, respectively. Results Of the 57 participants assessed for eligibility, 40 (70%) were allocated to the intervention (n=20) or control group (n=20) and 36 (n=18 in each) completed the courses. The mean age of the participants was 41 (SD 9) years. Most were women (39/40, 98%), White (38/40, 95%), clinical nurses (28/40, 70%), and had completed at least a bachelor’s degree (30/40, 75%). After the intervention, the mean score of intention was 6.3 (SD 0.8; 95% CI 5.9-6.7) for the intervention group and 6.0 (SD 1.2; 95% CI 5.42-6.64) for the control group (scale 1-7). The differences in intention and other psychosocial variable scores between the groups were not statistically significant. Knowledge scores for SDM were significantly higher in the intervention group (79%, 95% CI 70-89 vs 64%, 95% CI 57-71; P=.009). The intervention was significantly more acceptable in the intervention group (4.6, 95% CI 4.4-4.8 vs 4.3, 95% CI 4.1-4.5; P=.02), and reaction to the pedagogical approach was also significantly more positive in the intervention group (4.7, 95% CI 4.5-4.8 vs 4.4, 95% CI 4.2-4.5; P=.02). There was no significant difference in overall satisfaction (or in perceived usefulness). Furthermore, 17 participants (9 in the intervention group and 8 in the control group) provided written comments on the intervention. Conclusions This study focuses on web-based nursing education and its potential to support pregnant women’s decision-making needs. It shows that nurses’ intention to use a decision aid to enhance SDM in prenatal care is high, with or without training, but that their knowledge about SDM can be improved with web-based training. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/17878
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Poulin Herron
- Centre de recherche VITAM, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada., 2525, chemin de la Canardière, Quebec, CA.,Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec, CA
| | - Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje
- Centre de recherche VITAM, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada., 2525, chemin de la Canardière, Quebec, CA
| | - Sabrina Guay-Bélanger
- Centre de recherche VITAM, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada., 2525, chemin de la Canardière, Quebec, CA
| | - Gérard Ngueta
- Centre de recherche VITAM, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada., 2525, chemin de la Canardière, Quebec, CA.,Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, CA
| | - Geneviève Roch
- Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec, CA.,Centre de recherche VITAM, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada., 2525, chemin de la Canardière, Quebec, CA.,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre , Hôpital Saint François d'Assise, Quebec, CA
| | - François Rousseau
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre , Hôpital Saint François d'Assise, Quebec, CA.,Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Université Laval, Quebec, CA
| | - France Légaré
- Centre de recherche VITAM, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada., 2525, chemin de la Canardière, Quebec, CA.,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre , Hôpital Saint François d'Assise, Quebec, CA.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, CA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Agbadjé TT, Menear M, Gagnon MP, Légaré F. Theory-based approach to developing an implementation plan to support the adoption of a patient decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening. Implement Sci 2021; 16:56. [PMID: 34034761 PMCID: PMC8152135 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01103-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Our team has developed a decision aid to help pregnant women and their partners make informed decisions about Down syndrome prenatal screening. However, the decision aid is not yet widely available in Quebec’s prenatal care pathways. Objective We sought to identify knowledge translation strategies and develop an implementation plan to promote the use of the decision aid in prenatal care services in Quebec, Canada. Methods Guided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework and the Theoretical Domains Framework, we performed a synthesis of our research (11 publications) on prenatal screening in Quebec and on the decision aid. Two authors independently reviewed the 11 articles, extracted information, and mapped it onto the Knowledge-to-Action framework. Using participatory action research methods, we then recruited pregnant women, health professionals, managers of three prenatal care services, and researchers to (a) identify the different clinical pathways followed by pregnant women and (b) select knowledge translation strategies for a clinical implementation plan. Then, based on all the information gathered, the authors established a consensus on strategies to include in the plan. Results Our knowledge synthesis showed that pregnant women and their partners are not sufficiently involved in the decision-making process about prenatal screening and that there are numerous barriers and facilitators of the use of the decision aid in clinical practice (e.g., low intention to use it among health providers). Using a participatory action approach, we met with five pregnant women, three managers, and six health professionals. They informed us about three of Quebec’s prenatal care pathways and helped us identify 20 knowledge translation strategies (e.g., nurse discusses decision aid with women before they meet the doctor) to include in a clinical implementation plan. The research team reached a consensus about the clinical plan and also about broader organizational strategies, such as training healthcare providers in the use of the decision aid, monitoring its impact (e.g., measure decisional conflict) and sustaining its use (e.g., engage key stakeholders in the implementation process). Conclusion Next steps are to pilot our implementation plan while further identifying global strategies that target institutional, policy, and systemic supports for implementation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01103-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Matthew Menear
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Pierre Gagnon
- Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec, QC, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada. .,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada. .,Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec, QC, Canada. .,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stacey D, Légaré F, Boland L, Lewis KB, Loiselle MC, Hoefel L, Garvelink M, O'Connor A. 20th Anniversary Ottawa Decision Support Framework: Part 3 Overview of Systematic Reviews and Updated Framework. Med Decis Making 2021; 40:379-398. [PMID: 32428429 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20911870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) has guided practitioners and patients facing difficult decisions for 20 years. It asserts that decision support interventions that address patients' decisional needs improve decision quality. Purpose. To update the ODSF based on a synthesis of evidence. Methods. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews, searching 9 electronic databases. Eligible reviews included decisional needs assessments, decision support interventions, and decisional outcome measures guided by the ODSF. We extracted data and synthesized results narratively. Eight ODSF developers/expert users from 4 disciplines revised the ODSF. Results. Of 4656 citations, we identified 4 eligible reviews (>250 studies, >100 different decisions, >50,000 patients, 18 countries, 5 continents). They reported current ODSF decisional needs and their most frequent manifestations in the areas of inadequate knowledge/information, unclear values, decisional conflict/uncertainty, and inadequate support. They uncovered 11 new manifestations of 6 decisional needs. Using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) to assess decisional needs, average scores were elevated at baseline and declined shortly after decision making, even without information interventions. Patient decision aids were superior to usual care in reducing total DCS scores and improving decision quality. We revised the ODSF by refining definitions of 6 decisional needs and adding new interventions to address 4 needs. We added a decision process outcome and eliminated secondary outcomes unlikely to improve across a range of decisions, retaining the implementation/continuance of the chosen option and appropriate use/costs of health services. Conclusions. We updated the ODSF to reflect the current evidence and identified implications for practice and further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.,Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, and Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Canada
| | - Laura Boland
- Western University, School of Health Studies, London, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Marie-Chantal Loiselle
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lauren Hoefel
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Mirjam Garvelink
- Department of Value Based Healthcare, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hendriks MJ, Abraham A. Perinatal loss and parental loneliness: Narratives of late termination of pregnancy. DEATH STUDIES 2021; 46:1490-1500. [PMID: 33750278 DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2021.1894511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Advances in perinatal medicine, present increasing numbers of women with difficult decisions about their pregnancy. We explored the views of 5 parents and 5 perinatal healthcare professionals regarding late termination of pregnancy following the principles of qualitative content analysis. Parents deciding on whether to (dis)continue pregnancy needed more time and decisional support. Decentralized care and lacking continuity between caregivers led to negative experiences. No standardized bereavement services were offered after leaving the hospital. Integrating principles of perinatal palliative care to care might help to offer further decisional support and to overcome the fragmentation of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Hendriks
- Newborn Research, Department of Neonatology, Clinical Ethics, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - A Abraham
- Dialog Ethics, Interdisciplinary Institute of Ethics in Health Care, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Social Anthropology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Poulin Herron A, Agbadje TT, Cote M, Djade CD, Roch G, Rousseau F, Légaré F. Web-Based Training for Nurses on Shared Decision Making and Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9:e17878. [PMID: 33118955 PMCID: PMC7661244 DOI: 10.2196/17878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pregnant women often find it difficult to choose from among the wide variety of available prenatal screening options. To help pregnant women and their partners make informed decisions based on their values, needs, and preferences, a decision aid and a web-based shared decision making (SDM) training program for health professionals have been developed. In Canada, nurses provide maternity care and thus can train as decision coaches for prenatal screening. However, there is a knowledge gap about the effectiveness of SDM interventions in maternity care in nursing practice. Objective This study aims to assess the impact of an SDM training program on nurses’ intentions to use a decision aid for prenatal screening and on their knowledge and to assess their overall impressions of the training. Methods This is a 2-arm parallel randomized trial. French-speaking nurses working with pregnant women in the province of Quebec were recruited online by a private survey firm. They were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to either an experimental group, which completed a web-based SDM training program that included prenatal screening, or a control group, which completed a web-based training program focusing on prenatal screening alone. The experimental intervention consisted of a 3-hour web-based training hosted on the Université Laval platform with 4 modules: (1) SDM; (2) Down syndrome prenatal screening; (3) decision aids; and (4) communication between health care professionals and the patient. For the control group, the topic of SDM in Module 1 was replaced with “Context and history of prenatal screening,” and the topic of decision aids in Module 3 was replaced with “Consent in prenatal screening.” Participants completed a self-administered sociodemographic questionnaire with close-ended questions. We also assessed the participants' (1) intention to use a decision aid in prenatal screening clinical practice, (2) knowledge, (3) satisfaction with the training, (4) acceptability, and (5) perceived usefulness of the training. The randomization was done using a predetermined sequence and included 40 nurses. Participants and researchers were blinded. Intention to use a decision aid will be assessed by a t test. Bivariate and multivariate analysis will be performed to assess knowledge and overall impressions of the training. Results This study was funded in 2017 and approved by Genome Canada. Data were collected from September 2019 to late January 2020. This paper was initially submitted before data analysis began. Results are expected to be published in winter 2020. Conclusions Study results will inform us on the impact of an SDM training program on nurses’ intention to use and knowledge of decision aids for prenatal screening and their overall impressions of the training. Participant feedback will also inform an upgrade of the program, if needed. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04162288; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04162288 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/17878
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Poulin Herron
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Melissa Cote
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Codjo Djignefa Djade
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Geneviève Roch
- Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Francois Rousseau
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, Québec City, QC, Canada.,Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Huang WH, Shih SF, Lin CL, Liu CH. Pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making regarding prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis: scale development and validation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:407. [PMID: 32664895 PMCID: PMC7362405 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03093-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Down syndrome is a common chromosomal abnormality and prenatal screening can inform parents of the risk of their baby having Down syndrome. Little research has examined how decisions regarding both Down syndrome screening as well as diagnosis are made among women who are currently pregnant and how their decisions are influenced by their social contexts, specifically family and social media, using mixed methods. The study was to test the validity and reliability of a scale that measures pregnant women’s attitudes and decision-making concerning prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis in urban areas of Taiwan. Methods We developed an item pool based on a literature review and in-depth interviews with 30 pregnant women recruited at two district hospitals in urban areas. The item pool was reviewed by a panel of experts and then administered to 300 women who had been pregnant for less than 24 weeks and had not received the Down syndrome screening tests. We used item analysis and exploratory factor analysis to validate the scale and test its reliability. Results The initial item pool had 54 items. After the expert review, three items were deleted. After the item analysis, 16 additional items were deleted. Exploratory factor analysis of the remaining items revealed four factors labeled – “Attitudes towards Down syndrome and Screening Tests,” “Important others’ Attitudes towards Down Syndrome,” “Influence of Important Others on Decision-Making,” and “Influence of Social Media on Decision-Making” – and 16 of the remaining items had satisfactory loadings on those factors, explaining 72.0% of the total variance. The Cronbach’s α values of the dimensions ranged between 0.75 and 0.90, demonstrating satisfactory internal reliability. Conclusions The scale has satisfactory validity and reliability, and can be used to understand pregnant women’s attitudes and decision-making regarding Down syndrome screening and diagnosis, and to help design tailored consultations for pregnant women in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Hsiang Huang
- Department of Health Promotion and Health Education, College of Education, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 162, Sec. 1, Heping E. Rd., Da'an Dist, Taipei City, 106, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Fang Shih
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2029, USA
| | - Chen-Li Lin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei City Hospital, No. 12, Fuzhou St., Zhongzheng Dist, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Hsing Liu
- Department of Health Promotion and Health Education, College of Education, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 162, Sec. 1, Heping E. Rd., Da'an Dist, Taipei City, 106, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoefel L, O’Connor AM, Lewis KB, Boland L, Sikora L, Hu J, Stacey D. 20th Anniversary Update of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework Part 1: A Systematic Review of the Decisional Needs of People Making Health or Social Decisions. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:555-581. [DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20936209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) has been used for 20 years to assess and address people’s decisional needs. The evidence regarding ODSF decisional needs has not been synthesized. Objectives. To synthesize evidence from ODSF-based decisional needs studies, identify new decisional needs, and validate current ODSF decisional needs. Methods. A mixed-studies systematic review. Nine electronic databases were searched. Inclusion criteria: studies of people’s decisional needs when making health or social decisions for themselves, a child, or a mentally incapable person, as reported by themselves, families, or practitioners. Two independent authors screened eligibility, extracted data, and quality appraised studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were analyzed using narrative synthesis. Results. Of 4532 citations, 45 studies from 7 countries were eligible. People’s needs for 101 unique decisions (85 health, 16 social) were reported by 2857 patient decision makers ( n = 36 studies), 92 parent decision makers ( n = 6), 81 family members ( n = 5), and 523 practitioners ( n = 21). Current ODSF decisional needs were reported in 2 to 40 studies. For 6 decisional needs, there were 11 new (manifestations): 1) information (overload, inadequacy regarding others’ experiences with options), 2) difficult decisional roles (practitioner, family involvement, or deliberations), 3) unrealistic expectations (difficulty believing outcome probabilities apply to them), 4) personal needs (religion/spirituality), 5) difficult decision timing (unpredictable), and 6) unreceptive decisional stage (difficulty accepting condition/need for treatment, powerful emotions limiting information processing, lacking motivation to consider delayed/unpredictable decisions). Limitations. Possible publication bias (only peer-reviewed journals included). Possible missed needs (non-ODSF studies, patient decision aid development studies, 3 ODSF needs added in 2006). Conclusion. We validated current decisional needs, identified 11 new manifestations of 6 decisional needs, and recommended ODSF revisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Hoefel
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Laura Boland
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Health Studies, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lindsey Sikora
- Health Sciences Library, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jiale Hu
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S, Archambault PM, Ravitsky V, Lemoine ME, Langlois S, Forest JC, Giguère AMC, Rousseau F, Dolan JG, Légaré F. An Analytical Mobile App for Shared Decision Making About Prenatal Screening: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8:e13321. [PMID: 31596249 PMCID: PMC6913686 DOI: 10.2196/13321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decisions about prenatal screening to assess the risk of genetic conditions such as Down syndrome are complex and should be well informed. Moreover, the number of available tests is increasing. Shared decision making (SDM) about testing could be facilitated by decision aids powered by mobile technology. OBJECTIVE In this mixed methods study, we aim to (1) assess women's needs and preferences regarding using an app for considering prenatal screening, (2) develop a decision model using the analytical hierarchy process, and (3) develop an analytical app and assess its usability and usefulness. METHODS In phase 1, we will assess the needs of 90 pregnant women and their partners (if available). We will identify eligible participants in 3 clinical sites (a midwife-led birthing center, a family practice clinic, and an obstetrician-led hospital-based clinic) in Quebec City and Montreal, Canada. Using semistructured interviews, we will assess participants' attitudes toward mobile apps for decision making about health, their current use of apps for health purposes, and their expectations of an app for prenatal testing decisions. Self-administered questionnaires will collect sociodemographic information, intentions to use an app for prenatal testing, and perceived importance of decision criteria. Qualitative data will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. In phase 2, we will develop a decision model using the AHP whereby users can assign relative importance to criteria when deciding between options. We will validate the model with potential users and a multidisciplinary team of patients, family physicians, primary care researchers, decision sciences experts, engineers, and experts in SDM, genetics, and bioethics. In phase 3, we will develop a prototype of the app using the results of the first 2 phases, pilot test its usefulness and usability among a sample of 15 pregnant women and their partners (if available), and improve it through 3 iterations. Data will be collected with a self-administered questionnaire. Results will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Recruitment for phase 1 will begin in 2019. We expect results to be available in 2021. CONCLUSIONS This study will result in a validated analytical app that will provide pregnant women and their partners with up-to-date information about prenatal screening options and their risks and benefits. It will help them clarify their values and enable them to weigh the options to make informed choices consistent with their preferences and values before meeting face-to-face with their health care professional. The app will be easy to update with the latest information and will provide women with a user-friendly experience using their smartphones or tablets. This study and the resulting app will contribute to high-quality SDM between pregnant women and their health care team. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/13321.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patrick M Archambault
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche, Centre intégré en santé et services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- Programmes de bioéthique, Département de médecine sociale et préventive, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Eve Lemoine
- Programmes de bioéthique, Département de médecine sociale et préventive, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Sylvie Langlois
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jean-Claude Forest
- Centre de recherche, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguère
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Canadian Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - François Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - James G Dolan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Farrell RM, Mercer M, Agatisa PK, Coleridge MB. Balancing Needs and Autonomy: The Involvement of Pregnant Women's Partners in Decisions About cfDNA. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2019; 29:211-221. [PMID: 30182811 DOI: 10.1177/1049732318796833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) screening is used to identify the presence of fetal genetic variants early in pregnancy. Patients' informed decision-making is central to the success of this new screen in clinical practice. Although research has focused on pregnant women's decision-making, little is known about partners' role and preferences as a member of the decision-making dyad. Using a grounded theory approach, this study analyzed 23 in-depth interviews to examine partners' perspectives about cfDNA screening and preferences with respect to their role in the decision-making process. Participants wished to be actively involved in testing decisions. They articulated a distinct set of needs and preferences in the decision-making process. Such involvement was hindered by several biological and logistical barriers. This study demonstrates the need to develop mechanisms that foster informed decision-making for cfDNA screening and related new reproductive genetic technologies that focus on not just the pregnant woman but also the decision-making dyad that includes her partner as well.
Collapse
|
15
|
Smith SK, Cai A, Wong M, Sousa MS, Peate M, Welsh A, Meiser B, Kaur R, Halliday J, Lewis S, Trevena L, Yanes T, Barlow-Stewart K, Barclay M. Improving women's knowledge about prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome - development and acceptability of a low literacy decision aid. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18:499. [PMID: 30558569 PMCID: PMC6296052 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2135-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Access to information about prenatal screening is important particularly in light of new techniques such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). This study aimed to develop and examine the acceptability of a low literacy decision aid (DA) about Down syndrome screening among pregnant women with varying education levels and GPs. Methods We developed a DA booklet providing information about first-trimester combined testing, maternal serum screening, and NIPT. GPs and women participated in a telephone interview to examine the acceptability of the DA and measure screening knowledge before and after reading the DA. The knowledge measure was designed to assess whether women had understood the gist of the information presented in the decision aid. It comprised conceptual questions (e.g. screening tells you the chance of having a baby with Down syndrome) and numeric questions (e.g. the accuracy of different screening tests). Results Twenty-nine women and 18 GPs participated. Regardless of education level, most women found the booklet ‘very’ clearly presented (n = 22, 76%), and ‘very’ informative (n = 23, 80%). Overall, women’s conceptual and numeric knowledge improved after exposure to the DA, from 4% having adequate knowledge to 69%. Women’s knowledge of NIPT also improved after receiving the decision aid, irrespective of education. Most GPs found it ‘very’ clearly presented (n = 13, 72%), and that it would ‘very much’ facilitate decision-making (n = 16, 89%). Conclusions The DA was found to be acceptable to women as well as GPs. A comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of the decision aid compared to standard information is an important next step. Strategies are needed on how to implement the tool in practice. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2135-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sian Karen Smith
- Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia.
| | - Antonia Cai
- Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia
| | - Michelle Wong
- Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia
| | - Mariana S Sousa
- Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia.,Centre for Applied Nursing Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Ingham, Sydney, Australia.,South Western Sydney Local Health District, Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Alec Welsh
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia
| | - Rajneesh Kaur
- Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia
| | - Jane Halliday
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Sharon Lewis
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tatiane Yanes
- School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Margot Barclay
- Women's Services, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Western Sydney University, Parramatta, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van Bruggen MJ, Henneman L, Timmermans DRM. Women's decision making regarding prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy: A qualitative comparison between 2003 and 2016. Midwifery 2018; 64:93-100. [PMID: 29990629 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Situational factors of prenatal screening have changed in recent decades. To explore the effect of a changing context on women's decision making, differences and similarities in the decision-making process of pregnant women regarding prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy between two periods in time were studied. DESIGN A qualitative comparison was made between a dataset of 22 semi-structured interviews with pregnant women from 2003 and a newly collected dataset with 19 semi-structured interviews from 2016. FINDINGS Overall, women reported similar considerations in their decision-making process in 2003 and 2016, suggesting that decision making has not essentially changed. In 2016, women were still making a deliberate decision, however for some women costs and societal views as to what is acceptable did appear to impact the decision-making process. Moreover, new screening possibilities (e.g. improved test characteristics and including more conditions to be screened) seemed to impact the decision outcome. CONCLUSIONS Since most women based their decisions mainly on their personal values and personal experiences rather than on situational factors, the results suggest that the changing context with regard to prenatal screening had no major effect on women's decision making. It therefore seems unlikely that future changes in the field of prenatal screening will drastically change the decision-making process of pregnant women as long as informed and deliberate decision making is safeguarded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Metje J van Bruggen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Daniëlle R M Timmermans
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Agbadjé TT, Menear M, Dugas M, Gagnon MP, Rahimi SA, Robitaille H, Giguère AMC, Rousseau F, Wilson BJ, Légaré F. Pregnant women's views on how to promote the use of a decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening: a theory-informed qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:434. [PMID: 29884169 PMCID: PMC5994018 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3244-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For pregnant women and their partners, the decision to undergo Down syndrome prenatal screening is difficult. Patient decision aids (PtDA) can help them make an informed decision. We aimed to identify behaviour change techniques (BCTs) that would be useful in an intervention to promote the use of a PtDA for Down syndrome prenatal screening, and to identify which of these BCTs pregnant women found relevant and acceptable. Methods Using the Behaviour Change Wheel and the Theoretical Domains Framework, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study. First, a group of experts from diverse professions, disciplines and backgrounds (eg. medicine, engineering, implementation science, community and public health, shared decision making) identified relevant BCTs. Then we recruited pregnant women consulting for prenatal care in three clinical sites: a family medicine group, a birthing centre (midwives) and a hospital obstetrics department in Quebec City, Canada. To be eligible, participants had to be at least 18 years old, having recently given birth or at least 16 weeks pregnant with a low-risk pregnancy, and have already decided about prenatal screening. We conducted three focus groups and asked questions about the relevance and acceptability of the BCTs. We analysed verbatim transcripts and reduced the BCTs to those the women found most relevant and acceptable. Results Our group of experts identified 25 relevant BCTs relating to information, support, consequences, others’ approval, learning, reward, environmental change and mode of delivery. Fifteen women participated in the study with a mean age of 27 years. Of these, 67% (n = 10) were pregnant for the first time, 20% (n = 3) had difficulty making the decision to take the test, and 73% had made the decision with their partner. Of the 25 BCTs identified using the Behaviour Change Wheel, the women found the following 10 to be most acceptable and relevant: goal setting (behaviour), goal setting (results), problem solving, action plan, social support (general), social support (practical), restructuring the physical environment, prompts/cues, credible sources and modelling or demonstration of the behaviour. Conclusions An intervention to promote PtDA use among pregnant women for Down syndrome prenatal screening should incorporate the 10 BCTs identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada.,Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Canada
| | - Matthew Menear
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada.,Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Canada
| | - Michèle Dugas
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada.,Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada.,Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Canada
| | - Hubert Robitaille
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada.,Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguère
- Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.,Quebec Centre of Excellence on Aging, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.,MSSS/FRQS/CHUQ Research Chair in Health Technology Assessment and Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine, CHU de Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Brenda J Wilson
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada. .,Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Canada. .,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada. .,Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, entrée A-1-2, bureau A-4574, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S, Lépine J, Croteau J, Robitaille H, Giguere AM, Wilson BJ, Rousseau F, Lévesque I, Légaré F. Psychosocial Factors of Health Professionals' Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e114. [PMID: 29695369 PMCID: PMC5943629 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Revised: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome are difficult for women, as they entail risk, potential loss, and regret. Shared decision making increases women’s knowledge of their choices and better aligns decisions with their values. Patient decision aids foster shared decision making but are rarely used in this context. Objective One of the most promising strategies for implementing shared decision making is distribution of decision aids by health professionals. We aimed to identify factors influencing their intention to use a DA during prenatal visit for decisions about Down syndrome screening. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional quantitative study. Using a Web panel, we conducted a theory-based survey of health professionals in Quebec province (Canada). Eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) family physicians, midwives, obstetrician-gynecologists, or trainees in these professions; (2) involved in prenatal care; and (3) working in Quebec province. Participants watched a video depicting a health professional using a decision aid during a prenatal consultation with a woman and her partner, and then answered a questionnaire based on an extended version of the theory of planned behavior, including some of the constructs of the theoretical domains framework. The questionnaire assessed 8 psychosocial constructs (attitude, anticipated regret, subjective norm, self-identity, moral norm, descriptive norm, self-efficacy, and perceived control), 7 related sets of behavioral beliefs (advantages, disadvantages, emotions, sources of encouragement or discouragement, incentives, facilitators, and barriers), and sociodemographic data. We performed descriptive, bivariate, and multiple linear regression analyses to identify factors influencing health professionals’ intention to use a decision aid. Results Among 330 health professionals who completed the survey, 310 met the inclusion criteria: family physicians, 55.2% (171/310); obstetrician-gynecologists, 33.8% (105/310); and midwives, 11.0% (34/310). Of these, 80.9% were female (251/310). Mean age was 39.6 (SD 11.5) years. Less than half were aware of any decision aids at all. In decreasing order of importance, factors influencing their intention to use a decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening were as follows: self-identity (beta=.325, P<.001), attitude (beta=.297, P<.001), moral norm (beta=.288, P<.001), descriptive norm (beta=.166, P<.001), and anticipated regret (beta=.099, P=.003). Underlying behavioral beliefs significantly related to intention were that the use of a decision aid would promote decision making (beta=.117, 95% CI 0.043-0.190), would reassure health professionals (beta=.100, 95% CI 0.024-0.175), and might require more time than planned for the consultation (beta=−.077, 95% CI −0.124 to −0.031). Conclusions We identified psychosocial factors that could influence health professionals’ intention to use a decision aid about Down syndrome screening. Strategies should remind them of the following: (1) using a decision aid for this purpose should be a common practice, (2) it would be expected of someone in their societal role, (3) the experience of using it will be satisfying and reassuring, and (4) it is likely to be compatible with their moral values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Johanie Lépine
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jordie Croteau
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Quebec Support for People and Patient-Oriented Research and Trials Units, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Hubert Robitaille
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Anik Mc Giguere
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Quebec Centre of Excellence on Aging, Laval University Research Centre on Primary Healthcare and Services, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Brenda J Wilson
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - François Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | | | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fumagalli S, Antolini L, Nespoli A, Vergani P, Ferrazzi E, Oggioni S, Locatelli A. Prenatal diagnosis tests and women's risk perception: a cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2018. [PMID: 28635537 DOI: 10.1080/0167482x.2017.1291622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate women's decision to undergo non-invasive and/or invasive tests for prenatal diagnosis depending on the procedure-related risk and the risk of carrying a foetus with Down syndrome (DS). Both risks are rated in terms of numerical relevance and acceptability. METHOD A sample of 448 consecutive women with low-risk pregnancies were interviewed to collect social and clinical variables and to determine their perceptions of the risks of invasive procedure-related miscarriage and carrying a foetus with DS. The risks were scored numerically in terms of their relevance and acceptability using a 10-point rating scale. RESULTS The factors related to the use of non-invasive tests were age ≥35 years, not being treated at a public service, rating the risk of carrying a foetus with DS as having high numerical relevance and low acceptability, and rating the risk of miscarriage as having high acceptability. These relationships were still present when the use of invasive tests was considered, except in terms of the numerical relevance of the risk of carrying a foetus with DS. CONCLUSION Perceived acceptability affects the interpretation of a given risk more than the numerical relevance of the risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Fumagalli
- a School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca , Monza , Italy
| | - Laura Antolini
- a School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca , Monza , Italy
| | - Antonella Nespoli
- a School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca , Monza , Italy
| | - Patrizia Vergani
- a School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca , Monza , Italy
| | | | - Sara Oggioni
- a School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca , Monza , Italy
| | - Anna Locatelli
- a School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca , Monza , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bujold M, Pluye P, Légaré F, Haggerty J, Gore GC, Sherif RE, Poitras MÈ, Beaulieu MC, Beaulieu MD, Bush PL, Couturier Y, Débarges B, Gagnon J, Giguère A, Grad R, Granikov V, Goulet S, Hudon C, Kremer B, Kröger E, Kudrina I, Lebouché B, Loignon C, Lussier MT, Martello C, Nguyen Q, Pratt R, Rihoux B, Rosenberg E, Samson I, Senn N, Li Tang D, Tsujimoto M, Vedel I, Ventelou B, Wensing M. Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016400. [PMID: 29133314 PMCID: PMC5695438 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with complex care needs (PCCNs) often suffer from combinations of multiple chronic conditions, mental health problems, drug interactions and social vulnerability, which can lead to healthcare services overuse, underuse or misuse. Typically, PCCNs face interactional issues and unmet decisional needs regarding possible options in a cascade of interrelated decisions involving different stakeholders (themselves, their families, their caregivers, their healthcare practitioners). Gaps in knowledge, values clarification and social support in situations where options need to be deliberated hamper effective decision support interventions. This review aims to (1) assess decisional needs of PCCNs from the perspective of stakeholders, (2) build a taxonomy of these decisional needs and (3) prioritise decisional needs with knowledge users (clinicians, patients and managers). METHODS AND ANALYSIS This review will be based on the interprofessional shared decision making (IP-SDM) model and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Applying a participatory research approach, we will identify potentially relevant studies through a comprehensive literature search; select relevant ones using eligibility criteria inspired from our previous scoping review on PCCNs; appraise quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool; conduct a three-step synthesis (sequential exploratory mixed methods design) to build taxonomy of key decisional needs; and integrate these results with those of a parallel PCCNs' qualitative decisional need assessment (semistructured interviews and focus group with stakeholders). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This systematic review, together with the qualitative study (approved by the Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Service Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean ethical committee), will produce a working taxonomy of key decisional needs (ontological contribution), to inform the subsequent user-centred design of a support tool for addressing PCCNs' decisional needs (practical contribution). We will adapt the IP-SDM model, normally dealing with a single decision, for PCCNs who experience cascade of decisions involving different stakeholders (theoretical contribution). Knowledge users will facilitate dissemination of the results in the Canadian primary care network. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42015020558.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Bujold
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Pierre Pluye
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jeannie Haggerty
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Reem El Sherif
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Marie-Ève Poitras
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | - Paula L Bush
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Yves Couturier
- École de travail social, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada
| | | | - Justin Gagnon
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Anik Giguère
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Roland Grad
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Vera Granikov
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Serge Goulet
- Department of Family Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Catherine Hudon
- Department of Family Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada
| | | | | | - Irina Kudrina
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Bertrand Lebouché
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | - Cristiano Martello
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Quynh Nguyen
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Rebekah Pratt
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
| | - Benoit Rihoux
- Centre de Science Politique et de Politique Comparée, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
| | - Ellen Rosenberg
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Samson
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - David Li Tang
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Isabelle Vedel
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Badeau M, Lindsay C, Blais J, Nshimyumukiza L, Takwoingi Y, Langlois S, Légaré F, Giguère Y, Turgeon AF, Witteman W, Rousseau F. Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 11:CD011767. [PMID: 29125628 PMCID: PMC6486016 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011767.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common fetal aneuploidies include Down syndrome (trisomy 21 or T21), Edward syndrome (trisomy 18 or T18), Patau syndrome (trisomy 13 or T13), Turner syndrome (45,X), Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY), Triple X syndrome (47,XXX) and 47,XYY syndrome (47,XYY). Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies is standard care in many countries, but current biochemical and ultrasound tests have high false negative and false positive rates. The discovery of fetal circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) in maternal blood offers the potential for genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing (gNIPT) as a more accurate screening method. Two approaches used for gNIPT are massively parallel shotgun sequencing (MPSS) and targeted massively parallel sequencing (TMPS). OBJECTIVES To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MPSS and TMPS for gNIPT as a first-tier test in unselected populations of pregnant women undergoing aneuploidy screening or as a second-tier test in pregnant women considered to be high risk after first-tier screening for common fetal aneuploidies. The gNIPT results were confirmed by a reference standard such as fetal karyotype or neonatal clinical examination. SEARCH METHODS We searched 13 databases (including MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science) from 1 January 2007 to 12 July 2016 without any language, search filter or publication type restrictions. We also screened reference lists of relevant full-text articles, websites of private prenatal diagnosis companies and conference abstracts. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies could include pregnant women of any age, ethnicity and gestational age with singleton or multifetal pregnancy. The women must have had a screening test for fetal aneuploidy by MPSS or TMPS and a reference standard such as fetal karyotype or medical records from birth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently carried out study selection, data extraction and quality assessment (using the QUADAS-2 tool). Where possible, hierarchical models or simpler alternatives were used for meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS Sixty-five studies of 86,139 pregnant women (3141 aneuploids and 82,998 euploids) were included. No study was judged to be at low risk of bias across the four domains of the QUADAS-2 tool but applicability concerns were generally low. Of the 65 studies, 42 enrolled pregnant women at high risk, five recruited an unselected population and 18 recruited cohorts with a mix of prior risk of fetal aneuploidy. Among the 65 studies, 44 evaluated MPSS and 21 evaluated TMPS; of these, five studies also compared gNIPT with a traditional screening test (biochemical, ultrasound or both). Forty-six out of 65 studies (71%) reported gNIPT assay failure rate, which ranged between 0% and 25% for MPSS, and between 0.8% and 7.5% for TMPS.In the population of unselected pregnant women, MPSS was evaluated by only one study; the study assessed T21, T18 and T13. TMPS was assessed for T21 in four studies involving unselected cohorts; three of the studies also assessed T18 and 13. In pooled analyses (88 T21 cases, 22 T18 cases, eight T13 cases and 20,649 unaffected pregnancies (non T21, T18 and T13)), the clinical sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of TMPS was 99.2% (78.2% to 100%), 90.9% (70.0% to 97.7%) and 65.1% (9.16% to 97.2%) for T21, T18 and T13, respectively. The corresponding clinical specificity was above 99.9% for T21, T18 and T13.In high-risk populations, MPSS was assessed for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X in 30, 28, 20 and 12 studies, respectively. In pooled analyses (1048 T21 cases, 332 T18 cases, 128 T13 cases and 15,797 unaffected pregnancies), the clinical sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) of MPSS was 99.7% (98.0% to 100%), 97.8% (92.5% to 99.4%), 95.8% (86.1% to 98.9%) and 91.7% (78.3% to 97.1%) for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X, respectively. The corresponding clinical specificities (95% CI) were 99.9% (99.8% to 100%), 99.9% (99.8% to 100%), 99.8% (99.8% to 99.9%) and 99.6% (98.9% to 99.8%). In this risk group, TMPS was assessed for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X in six, five, two and four studies. In pooled analyses (246 T21 cases, 112 T18 cases, 20 T13 cases and 4282 unaffected pregnancies), the clinical sensitivity (95% CI) of TMPS was 99.2% (96.8% to 99.8%), 98.2% (93.1% to 99.6%), 100% (83.9% to 100%) and 92.4% (84.1% to 96.5%) for T21, T18, T13 and 45,X respectively. The clinical specificities were above 100% for T21, T18 and T13 and 99.8% (98.3% to 100%) for 45,X. Indirect comparisons of MPSS and TMPS for T21, T18 and 45,X showed no statistical difference in clinical sensitivity, clinical specificity or both. Due to limited data, comparative meta-analysis of MPSS and TMPS was not possible for T13.We were unable to perform meta-analyses of gNIPT for 47,XXX, 47,XXY and 47,XYY because there were very few or no studies in one or more risk groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS These results show that MPSS and TMPS perform similarly in terms of clinical sensitivity and specificity for the detection of fetal T31, T18, T13 and sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA). However, no study compared the two approaches head-to-head in the same cohort of patients. The accuracy of gNIPT as a prenatal screening test has been mainly evaluated as a second-tier screening test to identify pregnancies at very low risk of fetal aneuploidies (T21, T18 and T13), thus avoiding invasive procedures. Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing methods appear to be sensitive and highly specific for detection of fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in high-risk populations. There is paucity of data on the accuracy of gNIPT as a first-tier aneuploidy screening test in a population of unselected pregnant women. With respect to the replacement of invasive tests, the performance of gNIPT observed in this review is not sufficient to replace current invasive diagnostic tests.We conclude that given the current data on the performance of gNIPT, invasive fetal karyotyping is still the required diagnostic approach to confirm the presence of a chromosomal abnormality prior to making irreversible decisions relative to the pregnancy outcome. However, most of the gNIPT studies were prone to bias, especially in terms of the selection of participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mylène Badeau
- CHU de Québec ‐ Université LavalPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Axis45 Rue LeclercQuébec CityQCCanadaG1L 3L5
| | - Carmen Lindsay
- CHU de Québec ‐ Université LavalPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Axis45 Rue LeclercQuébec CityQCCanadaG1L 3L5
| | - Jonatan Blais
- CHAU‐Hôtel‐Dieu de LévisDepartment of Medical Biology143 Rue WolfeLévisQCCanadaG6V 3Z1
- Faculty of Medicine, Université LavalDepartment of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and PathologyQuebec CityQuebecCanada
| | - Leon Nshimyumukiza
- University of AlbertaSchool of Public Health8303 112 StreetEdmontonAlbertaCanadaT6G 2T4
| | - Yemisi Takwoingi
- University of BirminghamInstitute of Applied Health ResearchEdgbastonBirminghamUKB15 2TT
| | - Sylvie Langlois
- University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of MedicineC234, 4500 Oak StreetVancouverBCCanadaV6H 3N1
| | - France Légaré
- CHU de Québec ‐ Université LavalPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Axis45 Rue LeclercQuébec CityQCCanadaG1L 3L5
| | - Yves Giguère
- CHU de Québec ‐ Université LavalReproductive, Mother and Child Health Research Axis10, rue de l'Espinay, A2‐226Québec CityQCCanadaG1L 3L5
- Faculty of Medicine, Université LavalDepartment of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology10, rue de l'EspinayQuébec CityQcCanadaG1L 3L5
| | - Alexis F Turgeon
- CHU de Québec ‐ Université Laval, Université LavalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, and Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec ‐ Université Laval Research Center1401, 18eme rueQuebec CityQCCanadaG1J 1Z4
- CHU de Québec Research Center, Université LavalPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Axis1401, 18eme rueQuébec CityQuébecCanadaG1J 1Z4
| | - William Witteman
- CHU de Québec ‐ Université LavalPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Axis45 Rue LeclercQuébec CityQCCanadaG1L 3L5
| | - François Rousseau
- Faculty of Medicine, Université LavalDepartment of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology10, rue de l'EspinayQuébec CityQcCanadaG1L 3L5
- CHU de Québec Research Center, Université LavalPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Axis1401, 18eme rueQuébec CityQuébecCanadaG1J 1Z4
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Portocarrero MEL, Giguère AMC, Lépine J, Garvelink MM, Robitaille H, Delanoë A, Lévesque I, Wilson BJ, Rousseau F, Légaré F. Use of a patient decision aid for prenatal screening for Down syndrome: what do pregnant women say? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17:90. [PMID: 28320334 PMCID: PMC5359918 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1273-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient decision aids (PtDAs) help people make difficult, values-sensitive decisions. Prenatal screening for assessing the risk of genetic conditions in the fetus is one such decision and patient decision aids are rarely used in this clinical context. We sought to identify factors influencing pregnant women's use of a patient decision aid for deciding about prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS). METHODS This qualitative study was embedded in a sequential mixed-methods research program whose main aim is to implement shared decision-making (SDM) in the context of prenatal screening for DS in the province of Quebec, Canada. We planned to recruit a purposive sample of 45 pregnant women with low-risk pregnancy consulting for prenatal care at three clinical sites. Participating women watched a video depicting a prenatal care follow-up during which a pregnant woman, her partner and a health professional used a PtDA to decide about prenatal screening for DS. The women were then interviewed about factors that would influence the use of this PtDA using questions based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We performed content analysis of transcribed verbatim interviews. RESULTS Out of 216 eligible women, 100 agreed to participate (46% response rate) and 46 were interviewed. Regarding the type of health professional responsible for their prenatal care, 19 participants (41%) reported having made a decision about prenatal screening for DS with an obstetrician-gynecologist, 13 (28%) with a midwife, 12 (26%) with a family physician, and two (4%) decided on their own. We identified 54 factors that were mapped onto nine of the 12 TDF domains. The three most frequently-mentioned were: opinion of the pregnant woman's partner (n = 33, 72%), presentation of the PtDA by health professional and a discussion (n = 27, 72%), and not having encountered a PtDA (n = 26, 57%). CONCLUSION This study allowed us to identify factors influencing pregnant women's use of a PtDA for prenatal screening for DS. Use of a PtDA by health professionals and patients is one step in providing the needed decision support and our study results will allow us to design an effective implementation strategy for PtDAs for prenatal screening for DS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anik M. C. Giguère
- Centre d’Excellence sur le Vieillissement de Québec, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Johanie Lépine
- Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mirjam M. Garvelink
- Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hubert Robitaille
- Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Agathe Delanoë
- Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Lévesque
- CHU de Québec, Hôpital St-François d’Assise, and Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Brenda J. Wilson
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - François Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
- Health Technology Assessment and Evidence-based Laboratory Medicine, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Group, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Hôpital St-François d’Assise, 10, rue de l’Espinay/D6-730, Quebec, G1L 3L5 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Delanoë A, Lépine J, Turcotte S, Leiva Portocarrero ME, Robitaille H, Giguère AM, Wilson BJ, Witteman HO, Lévesque I, Guillaumie L, Légaré F. Role of Psychosocial Factors and Health Literacy in Pregnant Women's Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: A Theory-Based Web Survey. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18:e283. [PMID: 27793792 PMCID: PMC5106559 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2016] [Revised: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 09/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deciding about undergoing prenatal screening is difficult, as it entails risks, potential loss and regrets, and challenges to personal values. Shared decision making and decision aids (DAs) can help pregnant women give informed and values-based consent or refusal to prenatal screening, but little is known about factors influencing the use of DAs. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to identify the influence of psychosocial factors on pregnant women's intention to use a DA for prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS). We also added health literacy variables to explore their influence on pregnant women's intention. METHODS We conducted a survey of pregnant women in the province of Quebec (Canada) using a Web panel. Eligibility criteria included age >18 years, >16 weeks pregnant, low-risk pregnancy, and having decided about prenatal screening for the current pregnancy. We collected data based on an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behavior assessing 7 psychosocial constructs (intention, attitude, anticipated regret, subjective norm, descriptive norm, moral norm, and perceived control), 3 related sets of beliefs (behavioral, normative, and control beliefs), 4 health literacy variables, and sociodemographics. Eligible women watched a video depicting the behavior of interest before completing a Web-based questionnaire. We performed descriptive, bivariate, and ordinal logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Of the 383 eligible pregnant women who agreed to participate, 350 pregnant women completed the Web-based questionnaire and 346 were retained for analysis (completion rate 350/383, 91.4%; mean age 30.1, SD 4.3, years). In order of importance, factors influencing intention to use a DA for prenatal screening for DS were attitude (odds ratio, OR, 9.16, 95% CI 4.02-20.85), moral norm (OR 7.97, 95% CI 4.49-14.14), descriptive norm (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.63-4.92), and anticipated regret (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.71-3.46). Specific attitudinal beliefs significantly related to intention were that using a DA would reassure them (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.73-4.01), facilitate their reflections with their spouse (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.05-2.29), and let them know about the advantages of doing or not doing the test (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.05-2.24). Health literacy did not add to the predictive power of our model (P values range .43-.92). CONCLUSIONS Implementation interventions targeting the use of a DA for prenatal screening for DS by pregnant women should address a number of modifiable factors, especially by introducing the advantages of using the DA (attitude), informing pregnant women that they might regret not using it (anticipated regret), and presenting the use of DAs as a common practice (descriptive norm). However, interventions on moral norms related to the use of DA should be treated with caution. Further studies that include populations with low health literacy are needed before decisive claims can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agathe Delanoë
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Johanie Lépine
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Stéphane Turcotte
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | | | - Hubert Robitaille
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Anik Mc Giguère
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Quebec Centre of Excellence on Aging, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Office of Education and Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Brenda J Wilson
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Holly O Witteman
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Office of Education and Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Isabelle Lévesque
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Laurence Guillaumie
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Populations Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Group, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lépine J, Leiva Portocarrero ME, Delanoë A, Robitaille H, Lévesque I, Rousseau F, Wilson BJ, Giguère AMC, Légaré F. What factors influence health professionals to use decision aids for Down syndrome prenatal screening? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16:262. [PMID: 27596573 PMCID: PMC5011951 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1053-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Health professionals are expected to engage pregnant women in shared decision making to help them make informed values-based decisions about prenatal screening. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) foster shared decision-making, but are rarely used in this context. Our objective was to identify factors that could influence health professionals to use a PtDA for decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome during a clinical pregnancy follow-up. Methods We planned to recruit a purposive sample of 45 health professionals (obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians and midwives) involved in the care of pregnant women in three clinical sites (15 per site). Participating health professionals first watched a video showing two simulated consecutive prenatal follow-up consultations during which a pregnant woman, her partner and a health professional used a PtDA about Down syndrome prenatal screening. Participants were then interviewed about factors that would influence their use of the PtDA. Questions were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. We performed content analyses of transcribed verbatim interviews. Results Out of 42 eligible health professionals approached, 36 agreed to be interviewed (86 % response rate). Of these, 27 were female (75 %), nine were obstetrician-gynecologists (25 %), 15 were family physicians (42 %), and 12 were midwives (33 %), with a mean age of 42.1 ± 11.6 years old. We identified 35 distinct factors reported by 20 % or more participants that were mapped onto 10 of the 12 of the Theoretical Domains Framework domains. The six most frequently mentioned factors influencing use of the PtDA were: 1) a positive appraisal (n = 29, 81 %, beliefs about consequences domain); 2) its availability in the office (n = 27, 75 %, environmental context and resources domain); 3) colleagues’ approval (n = 27, 75 %, social influences domain); 4) time constraints (n = 26, 72 %, environmental context and resources domain); 5) finding it a relevant source of information (n = 24, 67 %, motivation and goals domain); and 6) not knowing any PtDAs (n = 23, 64 %, knowledge domain). Conclusions Appraisal, PtDA availability, peer approval, time concerns, evidence and PtDA awareness all affect whether health professionals are likely to use a PtDA to help pregnant women make informed decision about Down syndrome screening. Implementation strategies will need to address these factors. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1053-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanie Lépine
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Maria Esther Leiva Portocarrero
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Agathe Delanoë
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hubert Robitaille
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Lévesque
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, and MSSS/FRQS/CHUQ Research Chair in Health Technology Assessment and Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine, Quebec, Canada
| | - Brenda J Wilson
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguère
- Quebec Centre of Excellence on Aging, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation and Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada. .,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada. .,CHU de Québec Research Centre (CRCHUQ), Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, Université Laval, 10 rue de l'Espinay, Local D6-737, Quebec, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Smith SK, Sousa MS, Essink-Bot ML, Halliday J, Peate M, Fransen M. Socioeconomic Differences in Informed Decisions About Down Syndrome Screening: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2016; 21:868-907. [PMID: 27410478 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1177145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Supporting pregnant women to make informed choices about Down syndrome screening is widely endorsed. We reviewed the literature on: (a) the association between socioeconomic position and informed choices and decision-making about Down syndrome screening, and (b) the possible mediating variables (e.g., health literacy, numeracy skills, behavioral and communication variables) that might explain the relationship. EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from January 1999 to September 2014. The methodological quality of studies was determined by predefined criteria regarding the research aims, study design, study population and setting, measurement tools, and statistical analysis. A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Women from lower socioeconomic groups experience greater difficulties making informed choices about Down syndrome screening compared to women from higher socioeconomic groups. Most studies focus on individual dimensions of informed decision-making rather than assessing elements in conjunction with one another. Few studies have explored why there are socioeconomic differences in women's ability to make informed screening decisions. Future work is needed to identify mediating variables in this pathway. Systematic evidence-based intervention development to improve communication, understanding, and decision-making about Down syndrome screening is needed to ensure that women have an equal opportunity to make an informed choice about screening regardless of their socioeconomic position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sian K Smith
- a Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine , University of New South Wales , Sydney , New South Wales , Australia
| | - Mariana S Sousa
- b Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery , University of Western Sydney , Penrith , New South Wales , Australia
- c Prince of Wales Clinical School , University of New South Wales , Sydney , New South Wales , Australia
| | - Marie-Louise Essink-Bot
- d Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Jane Halliday
- e Murdoch Children's Research Institute , Royal Children's Hospital , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia
- f Department of Paediatrics , University of Melbourne , Parkville , Victoria , Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- g Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital , University of Melbourne , Parkville , Victoria , Australia
| | - Mirjam Fransen
- d Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Delanoë A, Lépine J, Leiva Portocarrero ME, Robitaille H, Turcotte S, Lévesque I, Wilson BJ, Giguère AMC, Légaré F. Health literacy in pregnant women facing prenatal screening may explain their intention to use a patient decision aid: a short report. BMC Res Notes 2016; 9:339. [PMID: 27401163 PMCID: PMC4940686 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-2141-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been suggested that health literacy may impact the use of decision aids (DAs) among patients facing difficult decisions. Embedded in the pilot test of a questionnaire, this study aimed to measure the association between health literacy and pregnant women's intention to use a DA to decide about prenatal screening. We recruited a convenience sample of 45 pregnant women in three clinical sites (family practice teaching unit, birthing center and obstetrical ambulatory care clinic). We asked participating women to complete a self-administered questionnaire assessing their intention to use a DA to decide about prenatal screening and assessed their health literacy levels using one subjective and two objective scales. RESULTS Two of the three scales discriminated between levels of health literacy (three numeracy questions and three health literacy questions). We found a positive correlation between pregnant women's intention to use a DA and subjective health literacy (Spearman coefficient, Rho 0.32, P = 0.04) but not objective health literacy (Spearman coefficient, Rho 0.07, P = 0.65). Hence subjective health literacy may affect the intention to use a DA among pregnant women facing a decision about prenatal screening. CONCLUSION Special attention should be given to pregnant women with lower health literacy levels to increase their intention to use a DA and ensure that every pregnant women can give informed and value-based consent to prenatal screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agathe Delanoë
- />Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Public Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Hôpital St-François d’Assise, 10 rue Espinay, D6-737, Quebec City, QC G1L 3L5 Canada
| | - Johanie Lépine
- />Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Public Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Hôpital St-François d’Assise, 10 rue Espinay, D6-737, Quebec City, QC G1L 3L5 Canada
| | - Maria Esther Leiva Portocarrero
- />Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Public Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Hôpital St-François d’Assise, 10 rue Espinay, D6-737, Quebec City, QC G1L 3L5 Canada
| | - Hubert Robitaille
- />Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Public Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Hôpital St-François d’Assise, 10 rue Espinay, D6-737, Quebec City, QC G1L 3L5 Canada
| | - Stéphane Turcotte
- />Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Public Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Hôpital St-François d’Assise, 10 rue Espinay, D6-737, Quebec City, QC G1L 3L5 Canada
| | - Isabelle Lévesque
- />Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Quebec City, QC Canada
| | - Brenda J. Wilson
- />Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Roger Guindon Hall, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Anik M. C. Giguère
- />Quebec Centre of Excellence on Aging, CHU de Québec Research Centre, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, QC Canada
| | - France Légaré
- />Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Public Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Hôpital St-François d’Assise, 10 rue Espinay, D6-737, Quebec City, QC G1L 3L5 Canada
- />Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Quebec City, QC Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Barter B, Hastings RP, Williams R, Huws JC. Perceptions and Discourses Relating to Genetic Testing: Interviews with People with Down Syndrome. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2016; 30:395-406. [DOI: 10.1111/jar.12256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Barter
- Mental Health in Learning Disability; South London and Maudsley; NHS Foundation Trust; SE5 8AZ London UK
| | - Richard Patrick Hastings
- Cerebra Chair of Family Research; CEDAR (Centre for Educational Development Appraisal and Research); University of Warwick; Coventry CV4 7AL UK
| | - Rebecca Williams
- Uwch Seicolegydd Ymgynghoro; University Health Board; North Wales UK
- Gwasanaethau Arbennigol Plant; Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol, Betsi Cadwaladr; University Health Board; North Wales UK
| | - Jaci C. Huws
- School of Healthcare Sciences; Prifysgol Bangor University; North Wales UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
29
|
Survivorship care plans in cancer: a systematic review of care plan outcomes. Br J Cancer 2014; 111:1899-908. [PMID: 25314068 PMCID: PMC4229639 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 165] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2014] [Revised: 07/28/2014] [Accepted: 08/18/2014] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eight years after the Institute of Medicine recommended survivorship care plans (SCPs) for all cancer survivors, this study systematically reviewed the evidence for their use. METHODS Studies evaluating outcomes after implementation of SCPs for cancer survivors were identified by searching databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane). Data were extracted and summarised. RESULTS Ten prospective studies (2286 survivors) met inclusion criteria (5 randomised controlled trials (RCTs)). Study populations included survivors of breast, gynaecological, colorectal and childhood cancer. Several models of SCP were evaluated (paper based/on-line, oncologist/nurse/primary-care physician-delivered and different templates). No significant effect of SCPs was found on survivor distress, satisfaction with care, cancer-care coordination or oncological outcomes in RCTs. Breast cancer survivors with SCPs were better able to correctly identify the clinician responsible for their follow-up care. One study suggested a positive impact on reducing unmet needs. Levels of survivor satisfaction with, and self-reported understanding of, their SCP were very high. Feasibility was raised by health professionals as a significant barrier, as SCPs took 1-4 h of their time to develop. CONCLUSIONS Emerging evidence shows very few measurable benefits of SCPs. Survivors reported high levels of satisfaction with SCPs. Resource issues were identified as a significant barrier to implementation.
Collapse
|
30
|
Willis AM, Smith SK, Meiser B, Muller C, Lewis S, Halliday J. How do prospective parents prefer to receive information about prenatal screening and diagnostic testing? Prenat Diagn 2014; 35:100-2. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.4493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2014] [Revised: 08/28/2014] [Accepted: 09/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. M. Willis
- Prince of Wales Clinical School; University of New South Wales; Sydney Australia
- Sydney Medical School; University of Sydney; Sydney Australia
| | - S. K. Smith
- Prince of Wales Clinical School; University of New South Wales; Sydney Australia
| | - B. Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School; University of New South Wales; Sydney Australia
| | - C. Muller
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Royal Children's Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - S. Lewis
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Royal Children's Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Paediatrics; University of Melbourne; Victoria Australia
| | - J. Halliday
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Royal Children's Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Paediatrics; University of Melbourne; Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nuccio R, Hashmi SS, Mastrobattista J, Noblin SJ, Refuerzo J, Smith JL, Singletary CN. Influence of Anchoring on Miscarriage Risk Perception Associated with Amniocentesis. J Genet Couns 2014; 24:278-84. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9761-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2013] [Accepted: 08/19/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
32
|
Jbilou J, Halilem N, Blouin-Bougie J, Amara N, Landry R, Simard J. Medical genetic counseling for breast cancer in primary care: a synthesis of major determinants of physicians' practices in primary care settings. Public Health Genomics 2014; 17:190-208. [PMID: 24993835 DOI: 10.1159/000362358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2013] [Accepted: 03/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This paper aims to identify relevant potential predictors of medical genetic counseling for breast cancer (MGC-BC) in primary care and to develop a comprehensive questionnaire to study MGC-BC. METHODS A scoping review was conducted to identify the predictors of MGC-BC among primary care physicians. Relevant articles were identified in selected databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL) and 4 selected relevant electronic journals. RESULTS An inductive analysis of the 193 quantitatively tested variables, conducted by 3 researchers, showed that 6 conceptual categories of determinants, namely (1) demographic, (2) organizational, (3) experiential, (4) professional, (5) psychological, and (6) cognitive, influence MGC-BC practices. CONCLUSION There is a scarcity of literature addressing the medical behavior determinants of MGC-BC. Future research is needed to identify effective strategies put into action to support the integration of MGC-BC in primary care medical practices and routines. However, our results shed light on 2 levels of actions that could improve genetic counseling services in primary care: (1) medical training and educational efforts emphasizing family history collection (individual level), and (2) clarification of roles and responsibilities in ordering and referral practices in genetic counseling and genetic testing for better healthcare management (organizational level).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jalila Jbilou
- Centre de formation médicale du Nouveau-Brunswick, Université de Moncton, Moncton, N.B., Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pivetti M, Melotti G, Morselli D, Olivieri M. Psychosocial factors affecting uptake of prenatal genetic testing: a pilot study. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33:1276-82. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.4248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2013] [Revised: 09/24/2013] [Accepted: 09/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Pivetti
- Department of Psychological, Humanistic and Territorial Sciences; University of Chieti-Pescara; Chieti Italy
| | - Giannino Melotti
- Department of Education ‘Giovanni Maria Bertin’; University of Bologna; Bologna Italy
| | - Davide Morselli
- Institute of Social Science; University of Lausanne; Lausanne Switzerland
| | - Mariangela Olivieri
- Department of Psychological, Humanistic and Territorial Sciences; University of Chieti-Pescara; Chieti Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Crombag NM, Bensing JM, Iedema-Kuiper R, Schielen PC, Visser GH. Determinants affecting pregnant women’s utilization of prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26:1676-81. [DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.798289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
35
|
McCoyd JLM. Preparation for prenatal decision-making: a baseline of knowledge and reflection in women participating in prenatal screening. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 34:3-8. [PMID: 23394407 DOI: 10.3109/0167482x.2012.757590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This prospective study gathered baseline information about knowledge and intentions regarding prenatal testing from women attending their nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasound and first sequential blood screen. METHOD Surveys including questions about pregnancy history and hypotheticals about fetal diagnoses were distributed to all willing participants at an urban hospital and a suburban medical building during the waiting time for the NT (N = 659). RESULTS The majority "never thought anything could be wrong" with their fetus and had not talked with the father or the health providers about that possibility. Presented with varied fetal diagnoses, the larger group nearly always "had the baby", except in the case of a fatal condition where 28% said they would have the baby in contrast to 26% who would end the pregnancy (remainder undecided). Hypotheticals about varied fetal conditions were generally "undecided" by a quarter to nearly half of the respondents. CONCLUSION Women's baseline knowledge and reflection about the nature of prenatal screening and diagnosis are minimal in contrast to the large impact positive results could have on their lives. Providers need to weigh the benefit of priming decision-making by exposing women to the possibility of fetal diagnosis, against the cost of raised anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith L M McCoyd
- Rutgers University, School of Social Work , New Brunswick, NJ 08102, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Huyard C. Decision-making after prenatal diagnosis of a syndrome predisposing to intellectual disability: what prospective parents need to know and the importance of non-medical information. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY 2012; 37:315-323. [PMID: 23062079 DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2012.726350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently researchers have suggested that non-medical information may impact the decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis. This study is an investigation of what type of information prospective parents need for this decision-making in the case of a condition predisposing to intellectual disability. METHOD Semistructured interviews were conducted in France, Belgium, and Germany with 33 parents whose children have a syndrome that predisposes to intellectual disability. RESULTS The essential information related to three dimensions: (1) the foetus as a future child and an individual person; (2) the couple as future parents; and (3) the social environment of the future child and his or her parents, and especially the ability of the social environment to provide support. CONCLUSIONS The findings introduce a new perspective on these prospective parents' essential needs, highlighting that these needs are not limited to medical information but encompass non-medical information and institutional patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Huyard
- Institut für Sozialforschung an der Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pivetti M, Montali L, Simonetti G. The discourse around usefulness, morality, risk and trust: a focus group study on prenatal genetic testing. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32:1205-11. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.3990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Pivetti
- Department of Psychological, Humanistic and Territorial Sciences; University of Chieti-Pescara; Chieti Italy
| | - Lorenzo Montali
- Department of Psychology; University of Milan-Bicocca; Milan Italy
| | - Giorgia Simonetti
- Department of Psychological, Humanistic and Territorial Sciences; University of Chieti-Pescara; Chieti Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gauthier J, Rouleau GA. De novo mutations in neurological and psychiatric disorders: effects, diagnosis and prevention. Genome Med 2012; 4:71. [PMID: 23009675 PMCID: PMC3580441 DOI: 10.1186/gm372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurological and psychiatric disorders account for a considerable proportion of the global disease burden. Although there is a high heritability and a significant genetic component in these disorders, the genetic cause of most cases has yet to be identified. Advances in DNA sequencing allowing the analysis of the whole human genome in a single experiment have led to an acceleration of the discovery of the genetic factors associated with human disease. Recent studies using these platforms have highlighted the important role of de novo mutations in neurological and psychiatric disorders. These findings have opened new avenues into the understanding of genetic disease mechanisms. These discoveries, combined with the increasing ease with which we can sequence the human genome, have important implications for diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Here, we present an overview of the recent discovery of de novo mutations using key examples of neurological and psychiatric disorders. We also discuss the impact of technological developments on diagnosis and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Gauthier
- Center of Excellence in Neuroscience of the Université de Montréal , Quebec, Canada H2L 4MI ; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada H2L 4MI
| | - Guy A Rouleau
- Center of Excellence in Neuroscience of the Université de Montréal , Quebec, Canada H2L 4MI ; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada H2L 4MI ; Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada H2L 4MI
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pergament E, Pergament D. Reproductive decisions after fetal genetic counselling. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 26:517-29. [PMID: 22809468 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2012] [Accepted: 04/12/2012] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
A broad range of testing modalities for fetal genetic disease has been established. These include carrier screening for single-gene mutations, first-trimester and second-trimester screening for chromosome abnormalities and open neural-tube defects, prenatal diagnosis by means of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis, and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reproductive decisions before and after fetal genetic counselling represent the culmination of a dynamic interaction between prospective parents, obstetrician and genetic counsellor. The decision to undergo genetic testing before and after genetic counselling is influenced by a host of interrelated factors, including patient-partner and family relationships, patient-physician communication, societal mores, religious beliefs, and the media. Because of the complexity of personal and societal factors involved, it is not surprising that genetic counselling concerning reproductive decision-making must be individualised. A limited number of principles, guidelines and standards apply when counselling about testing for fetal genetic disease. These principles are that genetic counselling should be non-directive and unbiased and that parental decisions should be supported regardless of the reproductive choice. A critical responsibility of the obstetrician and genetic counsellor is to provide accurate and objective information about the implications, advantages, disadvantages and consequences of any genetic testing applied to prospective parents and their fetuses. These principles and responsibilities will be tested as newer technologies, such as array comparative genome hybridisation, non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and sequencing of the entire genome are introduced into the field of reproductive genetics and become routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene Pergament
- Northwestern Reproductive Genetics, Inc., Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Pregnant women's and their partners' perception of an information model on prenatal screening. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32:461-6. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.2940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
41
|
Carroll FE, Owen-Smith A, Shaw A, Montgomery AA. A qualitative investigation of the decision-making process of couples considering prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32:57-63. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.2901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fran E. Carroll
- School of Social and Community Medicine; University of Bristol; Bristol UK
| | - Amanda Owen-Smith
- School of Social and Community Medicine; University of Bristol; Bristol UK
| | - Alison Shaw
- School of Social and Community Medicine; University of Bristol; Bristol UK
| | - Alan A. Montgomery
- School of Social and Community Medicine; University of Bristol; Bristol UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Åhman A, Lindgren P, Sarkadi A. Facts first, then reaction--expectant fathers' experiences of an ultrasound screening identifying soft markers. Midwifery 2011; 28:e667-75. [PMID: 21920645 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2011] [Revised: 07/08/2011] [Accepted: 07/24/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND expectant fathers often attend pregnancy ultrasound but their needs are poorly examined, especially in connection with adverse findings. OBJECTIVE to explore men's expectations of routine ultrasound and experiences when soft markers were discovered. DESIGN/SETTING a qualitative study at Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden where semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 17 expectant fathers 6-12 weeks after the discovery of a soft marker at the routine ultrasound scan. FINDINGS five major themes emerged: (1) 'immediate reaction: frustration and thoughts about consequences', (2) 'need for facts to gain control', (3) 'concern about the partner', (4) 'in retrospect: almost okay but routines need changing' and (5) 'amniocenteses or not: a joint decision with several considerations'. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTISE these findings contribute important knowledge about men's needs related to pregnancy ultrasound with unexpected findings, and their role in decision-making concerning fetal diagnostics. Our results show that men enter a role of a kind of fact manager and have both a psychological need as well as the capacity to perceive important information during the process following the detection of a soft marker in the fetus. Practitioners conducting pregnancy ultrasound should therefore have relevant knowledge to be able to provide immediate information about soft markers, including risk assessment for chromosomal defects. In addition to this, written information about soft markers should be available to expecting parents in this situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Åhman
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala university, Child Public Health Unit, Samariterhemmet, SE-751 25 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bryant LD, Green JM, Hewison J. The role of attitudes towards the targets of behaviour in predicting and informing prenatal testing choices. Psychol Health 2011; 25:1175-94. [PMID: 20204949 DOI: 10.1080/08870440903055893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Research considering the role of attitudes in prenatal testing choices has commonly focused on the relationship between the attitude towards undergoing testing and actual testing behaviour. In contrast, this study focused on the relationship between testing behaviour and attitudes towards the targets of the behaviour (in this case people with Down syndrome (DS) and having a baby with DS). A cross-sectional, prospective survey of 197 pregnant women measured attitudes towards the targets of prenatal testing along with intentions to use screening and diagnostic testing, and the termination of an affected pregnancy. Screening uptake was established via patient records. Although attitudes towards DS and having a baby with DS were significantly associated with screening uptake and testing and termination intentions, unfavourable attitudes were better than favourable ones at predicting these outcomes. For example, in the quartile of women with the 'most favourable' attitude towards people with DS 67% used screening although only 8% said they would terminate an affected pregnancy. Qualitative data suggested that not all women considered personal attitudes towards DS to be relevant to their screening decisions. This finding has implications for the way in which informed choice is currently understood and measured in the prenatal testing context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise D Bryant
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Légaré F, St-Jacques S, Gagnon S, Njoya M, Brisson M, Frémont P, Rousseau F. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a survey of willingness in women and family physicians to engage in shared decision-making. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31:319-26. [PMID: 21268046 DOI: 10.1002/pd.2624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2010] [Revised: 07/22/2010] [Accepted: 08/15/2010] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Durand MA, Wegwarth O, Boivin J, Elwyn G. Design and usability of heuristic-based deliberation tools for women facing amniocentesis. Health Expect 2011; 15:32-48. [PMID: 21241434 DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00651.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that in decision contexts characterized by uncertainty and time constraints (e.g. health-care decisions), fast and frugal decision-making strategies (heuristics) may perform better than complex rules of reasoning. OBJECTIVE To examine whether it is possible to design deliberation components in decision support interventions using simple models (fast and frugal heuristics). DESIGN The 'Take The Best' heuristic (i.e. selection of a 'most important reason') and 'The Tallying' integration algorithm (i.e. unitary weighing of pros and cons) were used to develop two deliberation components embedded in a Web-based decision support intervention for women facing amniocentesis testing. Ten researchers (recruited from 15), nine health-care providers (recruited from 28) and ten pregnant women (recruited from 14) who had recently been offered amniocentesis testing appraised evolving versions of 'your most important reason' (Take The Best) and 'weighing it up' (Tallying). RESULTS Most researchers found the tools useful in facilitating decision making although emphasized the need for simple instructions and clear layouts. Health-care providers however expressed concerns regarding the usability and clarity of the tools. By contrast, 7 out of 10 pregnant women found the tools useful in weighing up the pros and cons of each option, helpful in structuring and clarifying their thoughts and visualizing their decision efforts. Several pregnant women felt that 'weighing it up' and 'your most important reason' were not appropriate when facing such a difficult and emotional decision. CONCLUSION Theoretical approaches based on fast and frugal heuristics can be used to develop deliberation tools that provide helpful support to patients facing real-world decisions about amniocentesis.
Collapse
|
46
|
Gagnon S, Labrecque M, Njoya M, Rousseau F, St-Jacques S, Légaré F. How much do family physicians involve pregnant women in decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome? Prenat Diagn 2010; 30:115-21. [PMID: 20013876 DOI: 10.1002/pd.2421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the extent to which family physicians (FPs) involve women in decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome. METHODS Based on transcripts of consultations between 41 FPs and 128 women, two raters independently assessed clinician's efforts to involve women in decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome using the French-language version of OPTION. Descriptive statistics of OPTION scores were calculated. Construct validity was assessed by performing a principal factor analysis and by measuring association with consultation duration and FPs sociodemograhics. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and inter-rater reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS The overall mean OPTION score was low: 19 +/- 7 (range = 0 [no involvement] to 100 [high involvement]). One factor accounted for 80% of the variance. Both internal consistency and inter-rater reliability were very good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.73; ICC = 0.76). OPTION scores were lower for residents than for licensed FPs (17 +/- 5 vs 21 +/- 4; p = 0.02) and were positively associated with duration of consultation (r = 0.56; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Based on the French-language version of OPTION, which showed satisfactory psychometric properties, FPs studied put minimal efforts to involve women in decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susie Gagnon
- Centre de recherche du CHUQ-CRSFA, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Current world literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 22:166-75. [PMID: 20216348 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0b013e328338c956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|