1
|
Jane Ling MY, Ahmad N, Noor Aizuddin A, Ja’afar MH. A systematic review on the level of risk perception of diabetes mellitus: The role of environmental factor. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0308152. [PMID: 39078862 PMCID: PMC11288419 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk perception plays important role in motivating preventive health behaviours. The objective of this systematic review was to explore the level of diabetes risk perception among individuals with and without apparent risk for diabetes, and to consider the effect of environmental factors on the level of diabetes risk perception. METHODS This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The literature search was carried out through PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Original articles written in English and published between 2013 and 2023 were considered. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Narrative synthesis was undertaken due to methodological heterogeneity in the included studies. RESULTS A total of 13 cross-sectional studies, two randomized controlled trials, two cohort studies, two mixed methods studies and one quasi-experiment with a control group were included. An overall low level of diabetes risk perception was reported particularly in those without apparent risk for diabetes. The 20 included studies reported widely varied measures for calculating diabetes risk perception. The influence of environmental factors on the risk perception of diabetes was highlighted. LIMITATIONS The use of study-specific and non-validated measures in the included studies weakens the authors' ability to compare across studies. The role of language and publication bias within this systematic review should be acknowledged as we included only English-language studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Another limitation is the exclusion of dimensions of risk perception such as optimistic bias as search terms. CONCLUSION The overall low risk perception of diabetes calls for urgent need of public health interventions to increase the risk perception of diabetes. In the future, researchers should ensure the validity and reliability of the measures being used. The influence of environmental factors on the diabetes risk perception indicates that diabetes preventive interventions targeting environmental factors may be effective in increasing the risk perception of diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miaw Yn Jane Ling
- Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Norfazilah Ahmad
- Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Azimatun Noor Aizuddin
- Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Hasni Ja’afar
- Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lake AJ, Williams A, Neven ACH, Boyle JA, Dunbar JA, Hendrieckx C, Morrison M, O’Reilly SL, Teede H, Speight J. Barriers to and enablers of type 2 diabetes screening among women with prior gestational diabetes: A qualitative study applying the Theoretical Domains Framework. FRONTIERS IN CLINICAL DIABETES AND HEALTHCARE 2023; 4:1086186. [PMID: 36993822 PMCID: PMC10012118 DOI: 10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1086186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
IntroductionWomen with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Guidelines recommend postnatal diabetes screening (oral glucose tolerance test or HbA1c) typically 6-12 weeks after birth, with screening maintained at regular intervals thereafter. Despite this, around half of women are not screened, representing a critical missed opportunity for early identification of prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. While policy and practice-level recommendations are comprehensive, those at the personal-level primarily focus on increasing screening knowledge and risk perception, potentially missing other influential behavioral determinants. We aimed to identify modifiable, personal-level factors impacting postpartum type 2 diabetes screening among Australian women with prior gestational diabetes and recommend intervention functions and behavior change techniques to underpin intervention content.Research design and methodsSemi-structured interviews with participants recruited via Australia’s National Gestational Diabetes Register, using a guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Using an inductive-deductive approach, we coded data to TDF domains. We used established criteria to identify ‘important’ domains which we then mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behavior (COM-B) model.ResultsNineteen women participated: 34 ± 4 years, 19 ± 4 months postpartum, 63% Australian-born, 90% metropolitan, 58% screened for T2D according to guidelines. Eight TDF domains were identified: ‘knowledge’, ‘memory, attention, and decision-making processes’, ‘environmental context and resources’, ‘social influences’, ‘emotion’, ‘beliefs about consequences’, ‘social role and identity’, and ‘beliefs about capabilities’. Study strengths include a methodologically rigorous design; limitations include low recruitment and homogenous sample.ConclusionsThis study identified numerous modifiable barriers and enablers to postpartum T2D screening for women with prior GDM. By mapping to the COM-B, we identified intervention functions and behavior change techniques to underpin intervention content. These findings provide a valuable evidence base for developing messaging and interventions that target the behavioral determinants most likely to optimize T2D screening uptake among women with prior GDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia J. Lake
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioral Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- *Correspondence: Amelia J. Lake,
| | - Amelia Williams
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioral Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adriana C. H. Neven
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Jacqueline A. Boyle
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Monash Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - James A. Dunbar
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Christel Hendrieckx
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioral Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Sharleen L. O’Reilly
- School of Exercise & Nutrition Science, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
- UCD Institute of Food and Health, College of Health and Agricultural Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Jane Speight
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioral Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Linnenkamp U, Greiner GG, Haastert B, Adamczewski H, Kaltheuner M, Weber D, Icks A. Postpartum screening of women with GDM in specialised practices: Data from 12,991 women in the GestDiab register. Diabet Med 2022; 39:e14861. [PMID: 35472098 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gestational diabetes (GDM) in the short term is associated with various complications during pregnancy; however, in the long run, women have an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, short- and long-term follow-up postpartum is recommended. METHODS We assessed the proportion of postpartum diabetes screening among 12,991 women with their first GDM-diagnosed pregnancy in the study period in the nationwide German GestDiab register between 2015 and 2017. In addition to assessing prevalence, we assessed if the probability of postpartum screening was associated with maternal characteristics or pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS In total, 38.2% (95% CI 32.8%-43.7%) of our sample underwent postpartum diabetes screening, irrespective of its timing. Around 50% of women (19.3% of the total sample) undertook the screening in the recommended time frame of 6-12 weeks postpartum. We found that age, native language, pre-pregnancy BMI, smoking status, number of previous pregnancies, fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels as well as previous pregnancies with GDM and treatment with insulin were associated with participation in the postpartum diabetes screening in our sample. CONCLUSION In our study, more than 60% of the women with GDM did not participate in postpartum diabetes screening. This is a missed opportunity in a high-risk population to detect glucose intolerance. Consequently, appropriate interventions to prevent the progression to T2DM cannot be initiated. Further research should investigate barriers and enabling factors and allow developing a multilevel approach for GDM postpartum care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ute Linnenkamp
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Partner Düsseldorf, München-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Gregory Gordon Greiner
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Partner Düsseldorf, München-Neuherberg, Germany
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Burkhard Haastert
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- mediStatistica, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Heinke Adamczewski
- winDiab gGmbH, wissenschaftliches Institut der niedergelassenen Diabetologen, Neuss, Germany
| | - Matthias Kaltheuner
- winDiab gGmbH, wissenschaftliches Institut der niedergelassenen Diabetologen, Neuss, Germany
| | - Dietmar Weber
- winDiab gGmbH, wissenschaftliches Institut der niedergelassenen Diabetologen, Neuss, Germany
| | - Andrea Icks
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|