Home versus hospital intravenous antibiotic therapy for acute pulmonary exacerbations in children with cystic fibrosis

Update on the diagnosis and management of cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations

Pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis are associated with significant morbidity and reduced quality of life. Pulmonary exacerbation treatment guidelines, published by an expert panel assembled by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation nearly 15 years ago, were primarily consensus-based as there were several gaps in the evidence base. In particular, limited evidence existed regarding optimal pulmonary exacerbation treatment strategies, including duration of antibiotic therapy, treatment location, antibiotic selection, and the role of systemic corticosteroids. Over the last decade, results from observational studies and large multi-center randomized controlled trials have begun to answer important questions related to pulmonary exacerbation treatment. This review focuses on the diagnosis, etiology, and changing epidemiology of pulmonary exacerbations, and also summarizes the most recent and up-to-date studies describing pulmonary exacerbation treatment. Finally, this review provides consideration for future pulmonary exacerbation research priorities, particularly in the current highly effective modulator therapy era.

Association of site of treatment with clinical outcomes following intravenous antimicrobial treatment of a pulmonary exacerbation

BACKGROUND

In the STOP2 (Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations-2) study, intravenous (IV) antimicrobial treatment duration for adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) experiencing pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) was determined based on initial treatment response. The impact of home vs hospital care remains an important clinical question in CF. Our hypothesis was that STOP2 participants treated at home would have less improvement in lung function compared to those treated in the hospital.

METHODS

Treating clinicians determined PEx treatment location, which was a stratification factor for STOP2 randomization. Lung function, weight, and symptom recovery were evaluated by treatment location. Propensity scores and inverse probability treatment weighting were used to test for differences in clinical response by treatment location.

RESULTS

In all, 33% of STOP2 participants received IV antimicrobials in the hospital only, 46% both in the hospital and at home, and 21% at home only. Mean (95% CI) ppFEV₁ improvement was significantly (p < 0.05) lower for those treated at home only, 5.0 (3.5, 6.5), compared with at home and in the hospital, 7.0 (5.9, 8.1), and in the hospital only, 8.0 (6.7, 9.4). Mean weight (p < 0.001) and symptom (p < 0.05) changes were significantly smaller for those treated at home only compared to those treated in the hospital only.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to PEx treatment at home only, treatment in the hospital was associated with greater mean lung function, respiratory symptom, and weight improvements. The limitations of home IV therapy should be addressed in order to optimize outcomes for adults with CF treated at home.

Outcomes and endpoints reported in studies of pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus about which outcomes should be evaluated in studies of pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). Outcomes used for evaluation should be meaningful; that is, they should capture how people feel, function or survive and be acknowledged as important to people with CF, or should be reliable surrogates of those outcomes. We aimed to summarise the outcomes and corresponding endpoints which have been reported in studies of pulmonary exacerbations, and to identify those which are most likely to be meaningful.

METHODS

A PROSPERO registered systematic review (CRD42020151785) was conducted in Medline, Embase and Cochrane from inception until July 2020. Registered trials were also included.

RESULTS

144 studies met the inclusion criteria. A wide range of outcomes and corresponding endpoints were reported. Death, QoL and many patient-reported outcomes are likely to be meaningful as they directly capture how people feel, function or survive. Forced expiratory volume in 1-second [FEV₁] is a validated surrogate of risk of death and reduced QoL. The extent of structural lung disease has also been correlated with lung function, pulmonary exacerbations and risk of death. Since no evidence of a correlation between airway microbiology or biomarkers with clinically meaningful outcomes was found, the value of these as surrogates was unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Death, QoL, patient-reported outcomes, FEV₁, and structural lung changes were identified as outcomes that are most likely to be meaningful. Development of a core outcome set in collaboration with stakeholders including people with CF is recommended.

Is out-patient based treatment of bronchiectasis exacerbations in children comparable to inpatient based treatment?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Children with bronchiectasis have recurrent exacerbations and may require hospitalization. "Hospital in the home (HITH)" is used as an alternative to hospitalization for children with cystic fibrosis (CF) but to date, there is no published data on children without CF. We describe our experience of HITH (intravenous [IV] antibiotics and at least once-daily physiotherapy-treated airway clearance therapy) in a cohort of children with bronchiectasis, comparing outcomes between hospital and HITH-based pathways.

METHODS

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed in children with bronchiectasis who were hospitalized in our center from July 2016 to July 2018. We compared treatment duration, symptom resolution, adverse events, oral antibiotic prescription on discharge and "time-to-next hospitalization" between children managed with the two treatment pathways.

RESULTS

Exacerbations in 63 children (median age = 6 years [range: 1-17]; females = 33, indigenous = 8) with bronchiectasis treated with IV antibiotic therapy were analyzed (HITH n = 45, 71.5%). Duration of treatment and symptom resolution was similar between groups (hospital: median = 14 days [interquartile range {IQR}: 14-14] and 12/18 [66.6%], respectively vs HITH: 14 [14-15.5] and 31/45 [69%]; P = .53 and .85, respectively). There was no significant difference in adverse events (16.6% vs 9%), prescription of oral antibiotics on discharge (44% vs 24%), or "time-to-next hospitalization" (median 42 [IQR: 24-100] vs 67 [IQR: 32-95] weeks) between hospital and HITH groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with bronchiectasis treated for a severe exacerbation, receiving treatment in the home setting with HITH does not compromise short-term clinical outcomes compared to hospital only treatment. Prospective studies are required to provide more robust evidence in this under-researched area.

Pediatric hospital in the home: clinical outcomes for treatment of a cystic fibrosis respiratory exacerbation

Background: Children with cystic fibrosis (CF) have recurrent lung infections and these exacerbation periods have conventionally been treated in hospital. Hospital in the Home (HITH) programs have recently been introduced but equivalence of care has not previously been established.Objectives: To determine if standardization of treatment (application and frequency) for children with CF during a pulmonary exacerbation would produce equivocal clinical outcomes (lung function and weight), regardless of whether treatment was received in hospital or HITH.Design and Participants: A retrospective audit was conducted on electronic medical records from 39 children with CF (6-17 years).Main Outcome measures: Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), forced vital capacity (FVC), weight and length of stay (LOS) were compared between participants treated either in hospital or under the provision of HITH.Results: Care provided by HITH was found to be equivalent to hospital-based care (mean difference; 95% CI) for: FEV₁ (0.067; -0.104, 0.238); FVC (0.051; -0.102, 0.204); weight (0.718; -0.251, 1.687); and LOS (-0.781, -2.505, 0.943). All investigated clinical measurements significantly improved (FEV₁ p = .001; FVC p < .001; and weight p < .001) from admission to discharge for both hospital and HITH participants.Conclusions: HITH appears comparable to hospital provision of care for children with CF during a pulmonary exacerbation in terms of post-treatment outcomes (FEV₁, FVC, weight, and LOS).

Outcomes and Safety of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Select Children with Cystic Fibrosis

Background: Pulmonary exacerbations (PExs) are common in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). Data regarding outcomes of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in children are sparse. Methods: Retrospective data of PEx episodes treated in the hospital versus OPAT collected. Children ≤18 years were included. Outcome measures included FEV1, FVC, FEF25-75%P, time to the next PEx, and weight gain. Results: Eighty-three subjects with 290 PEx events were eligible. The hospital group had 242 and the OPAT group had 48 PEx events. The median age was 13.1 years for the OPAT and 13.4 years for the hospital group. Medicaid coverage was higher in the hospital group (82.2%) versus OPAT group (48.9%, P < 0.0001). The hospital group had lower FEV1%P on admission [72%P (interquartile range [IQR] = 59.7 and 84) versus 80%P (IQR = 70.7 and 89); P = 0.001] and at the end of treatment [86%P (IQR = 72 and 96.7) versus 92%P (IQR = 82 and 101); P = 0.003] in comparison with OPAT group. FEV1%P improved more in the hospital group, [12%P (IQR = 4 and 20)] versus in the OPAT group [8%P (IQR = 2 and 22.5); (P = 0.41)] but did not quite reach a statistically significant level. The hospital intravenous (IV) group gained more weight (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between the 2 groups in time to the first PEx (P = 0.47) and adverse events. Conclusion: OPAT was safe and comparable with hospital therapy in a select group of children with CF. Hospital IV should be considered for sicker children and families with limited resources.

Treatment Setting and Outcomes of Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbations

RATIONALE

There are important gaps in knowledge of the optimal treatment of cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations. Previous observational studies comparing inpatient with outpatient treatment have suffered from methodologic weaknesses, especially indication bias.

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed data from the Epidemiologic Study of Cystic Fibrosis using techniques to control for indication bias to determine whether there is an advantage to inpatient treatment of cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations.

METHODS

We identified typical pulmonary exacerbations in patients ages 6 years and older during the 3-year observation period ending in 2005. In our primary analysis, we used the instrumental variables method, implemented using two-stage least squares regression, to evaluate the effect of the proportion of total time that intravenous treatment was administered on an inpatient (versus outpatient) basis on the likelihood of return of percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second to greater than or equal to 90% of baseline post-treatment. We also evaluated two other indicators of treatment setting, three other measures of treatment response, and two alternative modeling techniques, and we also looked for differences between children and adults.

RESULTS

Our final analysis included 4,497 pulmonary exacerbations in 2,773 individual patients at 75 sites. We calculated the mean proportion of intravenous treatment time that was provided in the hospital setting at each site. The median across sites was 0.581 (interquartile range, 0.396-0.753). The median treatment success rate across sites was 74.2% (interquartile range, 67.9 to 79.2%). Univariate analysis and two-stage least squares models showed a positive relationship between treatment success and proportion of inpatient treatment days. Our primary model revealed an absolute increase of 9.08% (95% confidence interval, 2.55-15.61; P = 0.006) in the achievement of a return of percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second to greater than or equal to 90% of baseline comparing complete inpatient treatment with no inpatient treatment. Treatment response was not related to duration of intravenous therapy. Similar results were found for all our modeling techniques and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cystic fibrosis treated at sites with more reliance on inpatient treatment were more likely to achieve successful forced expiratory volume in 1 second recovery. There was no relationship between treatment duration and recovery of forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

The Impact of Pediatric Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy Implementation at a Tertiary Children's Hospital in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) have largely focused on adult practice, and there are few published data on the safety and effectiveness of pediatric OPAT (p-OPAT).

METHODS

During a 3-year period (2012 to 2015), data were prospectively collected on patients managed within the p-OPAT service at Southampton Children's Hospital, a tertiary pediatric hospital in the South of England.

RESULTS

A total of 130 p-OPAT episodes were managed during this period. The most frequently managed pathologies were bone and joint infections (44.6%), followed by ear, nose and throat (10.7%), respiratory (10.0%) and central nervous system (10.0%) infections. The most frequently used antimicrobial agent was ceftriaxone (n = 103; 79.2%). For the majority of p-OPAT episodes, antimicrobials were delivered in prefilled syringes (n = 109; 83.8%); 24-hour infusions administered by elastomeric devices were used less commonly (n = 16; 12.3%). The median duration of p-OPAT treatment was 9.2 days (interquartile range: 7.6-19.0 days). With regard to patient outcomes, 113 (86.9%) p-OPAT episodes resulted in cure and 12 (9.2%) in improvement; treatment failure occurred in 5 (3.9%) episodes. Intravenous catheter-related complications were rare. A total of 1683 bed days were saved over the 3-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that p-OPAT is safe and effective, with the potential to offer considerable savings for the healthcare economy through reduced length of inpatient stay.

Recent advances in the understanding and management of cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations

Pulmonary exacerbations are common events in cystic fibrosis and have a profound impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Pulmonary exacerbation outcomes remain poor and a significant proportion of patients fail to recover their baseline lung function despite receiving aggressive treatment with intravenous antibiotics. This focused review provides an update on some of the recent advances that have taken place in our understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis as well as direction for future study.

Inpatient versus outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy at home for acute infections in children: a systematic review

Inpatient management is necessary in many situations, but medical and allied-health treatments are increasingly being used on an outpatient basis to allow patients who would traditionally have been admitted to hospital to remain at home. Home-based clinical management has many potential benefits, including reduced hospital-acquired infections, cost savings, and patient and family satisfaction. Studies in adults provide evidence for the benefits of home-based versus hospital-based intravenous antibiotics, but few studies inform practice in home-based intravenous antibiotic therapy for children. We systematically reviewed the efficacy, safety, satisfaction, and cost of home-based versus hospital-based intravenous antibiotic therapy for acute infections in children. We searched MEDLINE (from Jan 1, 1946, to Jan 31, 2017) and Embase (from Jan 1, 1974, to Jan 31, 2017) for studies investigating home-based and hospital-based intravenous antibiotic therapy and assessed them for quality. 2827 articles were identified and 19 studies were included in the systematic review. Efficacy results differed between studies depending on the outcome assessed. The incidence of complications and readmission to hospital was similar for hospital-based and home-based treatments. In seven (47%) of 15 studies, patients who had all or part of their treatment at home received treatment for longer than patients who were treated entirely in hospital. No studies showed that home-based treatment was less safe than hospital-based treatment. In all studies in which treatment satisfaction or costs were assessed, home-based treatment was satisfactory to patients or patients' families and less expensive per episode than hospital-based treatment by 30-75%. Thus, home-based intravenous antibiotic therapy might be popular and cost-effective, but randomised studies of the efficacy of this strategy are needed. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42015024406).

Respiratory System Disease

Respiratory system involvement in cystic fibrosis is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Defects in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene throughout the sinopulmonary tract result in recurrent infections with a variety of organisms including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and nontuberculous mycobacteria. Lung disease occurs earlier in life than once thought and ideal methods of monitoring lung function, decline, or improvement with therapy are debated. Treatment of sinopulmonary disease may include physiotherapy, mucus-modifying and antiinflammatory agents, antimicrobials, and surgery. In the new era of personalized medicine, CFTR correctors and potentiators may change the course of disease.

Probability of IV antibiotic retreatment within thirty days is associated with duration and location of IV antibiotic treatment for pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

There are few objective data to guide management of cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations. We studied intravenous (IV) antibiotic treatment failure as defined by a need to retreat patients with IV antibiotics within 30days of completion of a prior IV antibiotic treatment for pulmonary exacerbation.

METHODS

The first IV-treated exacerbation on or after Jan. 1, 2010 among US CF Foundation Patient Registry patients was studied, combining treatments separated by <7days into single treatments. IV treatment duration categories were: 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-22, and ≥23days (inclusive). Logistic regressions for IV retreatment in ≤30days were adjusted with 12 categorical covariates, including age, sex, lung function, prior-year exacerbations, CF complications, CF Care Program, and ever/never treated in hospital.

RESULTS

777 of 13,579 patients (5.7%) were retreated within 30days, with incidence varying by treatment duration: 1-4days, 8.7%; 5-8days; 6.6%; 9-12days, 3.2%; 13-16days, 4.5%; 17-22days, 6.2%; ≥23days, 10.3% and hospitalization: ever, 5.0%; never 8.5%. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for retreatment (compared to 13-16days treatment) were: 1-4days, 1.94 [95%CI 1.49, 2.54] P<.001; 5-8days, 1.55 [1.18, 2.04] P=.002; 9-12days, 0.78 [0.58, 1.04] P=.09; 17-22days, 1.12 [0.88, 1.42] P=.37; ≥23days, 1.46 [1.12, 1.91] P=.005. Adjusted retreatment OR for never/ever hospitalized was 1.57 [1.29, 1.90] P<.001. Prior-year exacerbation number, oxygen therapy, non-invasive ventilation, and female sex were significantly associated with retreatment. Modeling hazard rate time-dependence showed that treatment duration and location-associated hazard rates attenuated within a few months after treatment.

CONCLUSION

After adjustment for covariates known to be associated with increased risk of IV treatment for exacerbation, IV antibiotic treatments of <9 and ≥23days and those without hospitalization were significant risk factors for IV retreatment within 30days of completion of an exacerbation treatment.

Home versus hospital intravenous antibiotic therapy for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Recurrent endobronchial infection in cystic fibrosis requires treatment with intravenous antibiotics for several weeks usually in hospital, affecting health costs and quality of life for patients and their families. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether home intravenous antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis is as effective as inpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy and if it is preferred by individuals or families or both.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 23 November 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled studies of intravenous antibiotic treatment for adults and children with cystic fibrosis at home compared to in hospital.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors independently selected studies for inclusion in the review, assessed methodological quality of each study and extracted data using a standardised form.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen studies were identified by the searches. Only one study could be included which reported results from 17 participants aged 10 to 41 years with an infective exacerbation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All their 31 admissions (18 hospital and 13 at home after two to four days of hospital treatment) were analysed as independent events. Outcomes were measured at 0, 10 and 21 days after initiation of treatment. Home participants underwent fewer investigations than hospital participants (P < 0.002) and general activity was higher in the home group. No significant differences were found for clinical outcomes, adverse events, complications or change of intravenous lines,or time to next admission. Home participants received less low-dose home maintenance antibiotic.Quality of life measures showed no significant differences for dyspnoea and emotional state, but fatigue and mastery were worse for home participants, possibly due to a higher general activity and need of support. Personal, family, sleeping and eating disruptions were less important for home than hospital admissions.Home therapy was cheaper for families and the hospital. Indirect costs were not determined.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence is restricted to a single randomized clinical trial. It suggests that, in the short term, home therapy does not harm individuals, entails fewer investigations, reduces social disruptions and can be cost-effective. There were both advantages and disadvantages in terms of quality of life. The decision to attempt home treatment should be based on the individual situation and appropriate local resources. More research is urgently required.

Domiciliary administration of intravenous albumin in congenital nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Early management of congenital nephrotic syndrome invariably includes the frequent administration of intravenous human albumin solution. The safety and feasibility of intravenous administration of albumin in the patients' home setting has not previously been reported.

CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

We report a series of seven paediatric patients whose parents were trained in the administration of albumin via a central venous catheter at home, with the aim of minimising hospital admission or attendances. We describe the clinical course of these patients and complication rates ascribed to this strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that home albumin infusion can be performed safely.

Physical activity in adults with cystic fibrosis receiving intravenous antibiotics in hospital and in the community

Introduction :

Intravenous antibiotic therapy (IVAT) for CF acute pulmonary exacerbations (APE) can be delivered in hospital or in the community. This study aimed to compare physical activity in CF patients receiving hospital and community-delivered IVAT, as well as other health outcomes.

Materials and Methods :

This was a non-randomised parallel group prospective observational study. Hospitalised and community-treated CF adults receiving IVAT for APE were asked to wear ActiGraph® activity monitors, complete the habitual activity estimation scale (HAES), food diary, modified shuttle test (MST) and CFQ-R at the start and end of therapy. Nutritional and clinical outcomes were also compared between the cohorts. The primary outcomes was physical activity measured by the ActiGraph® activity monitors at the beginning and end of treatment in both cohorts.

Results :

Physical activity (measured and self-reported) was no different between the cohorts, with both hospitalised and community-treated subjects being generally sedentary. Body weight increased significantly in the hospitalised cohort, whereas no difference was seen in the community-treated cohort. FEV1 % predicted and FVC % predicted increased in community-treated subjects, whereas only FVC % predicted increased in hospitalised subjects. CFQ-R respiratory domain increased to a greater extent in community-treated subjects.

Conclusion :

CF adults receiving IVAT for APE, both in hospital and in the community, are generally sedentary and we found no difference in physical activity between the two groups. These findings suggests the need to further promote physical activity in suitable patients during APE where considered appropriate.

Intravenous and Inhaled Antimicrobials at Home in Cystic Fibrosis Patients

The primary clinical characteristics of cystic fibrosis (CF) are malnutrition caused by malabsorption secondary to pancreatic insufficiency, chronic pulmonary infections, and male infertility. The major cause of morbidity and mortality are bronchiectasis and obstructive pulmonary disease. Lung disease in CF is manifested by this chronic lung disease progression, with intermittent episodes of acute worsening of symptoms called pulmonary exacerbations. Once the patient has stabilized, and if suitable care can be arranged, these interventions are often transitioned to the home. This review summarizes important points pertinent to the use of intravenous and inhaled antimicrobials that may be encountered by prescribers, nurses, technicians, and case managers in the home health setting. Appropriate dosing, indications, adverse drug reactions, monitoring parameters, and practicality of both intravenous and inhaled antimicrobials are discussed.

Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) during CF pulmonary exacerbation: trends and biomarker correlations

INTRODUCTION

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by low circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), a hormone produced by the liver that governs anabolism and influences immune cell function. Because treatment of CF pulmonary exacerbation (CFPE) often improves body weight and lung function, we questioned whether serum IGF-1 trends were emblematic of these responses. Initially, we compared serum levels between healthy adults with CF and controls of similar age. We then measured serum IGF-1 throughout the CFPE cycle. We also investigated correlations among IGF-1 and other serum biomarkers during CFPE.

METHODS

Anthopometric, spirometric, and demographic data were collected. Serum IGF-1 concentrations were measured by ELISA.

RESULTS

CF subjects in their usual state of health had lower serum IGF-1 levels than controls. Serum IGF-1 concentrations fell significantly from baseline at the beginning of CFPE. Treatment with intravenous antibiotics was associated with significant improvement in serum IGF-1 levels, body mass index (BMI), and percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1 %). At early and late CFPE, serum IGF-1 was directly correlated with FEV1 %, serum iron, hemoglobin concentration, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) and indirectly correlated with alpha-1-antitrypsin.

CONCLUSIONS

This study not only supports the paradigm that CF is characterized by IGF-1 deficiency but also that trends in lung function, nutritional status, and serum IGF-1 are related. Improvements in all three parameters after antibiotics for CFPE likely highlight the connection between lung function and nutritional status in CF. Close correlations among IGF-1 and iron-related hematologic parameters suggest that IGF-1 may participate in CF iron homeostasis, another process that is known to be influenced by CFPE.

Internet video to support intravenous medication administration in the home: a cost minimisation study

We compared the costs associated with three different methods of administering antibiotics to paediatric oncology patients. In scenario A, medicine was prepared in the home, checked in the home using a video link to a second nurse, and administered in the home. In scenario B, medicine was prepared by outsourcing the work to a commercial organisation, checked by pharmacists off-site and administered in the home. In scenario C, medicine was prepared in the hospital, checked by a second nurse and administered in the outpatient department. The staff time required for home administration was calculated from actual home visits. The cost of tablet computers and mobile Internet charges for double-checks in the home was based on an assumed useful life of 3 years for the equipment. The cost of outsourcing the preparation of medications was calculated from the actual cost of doing so during a four month period. Patient outcome was assumed to be the same in all three scenarios. The mean costs of a medication episode (i.e. one occasion of medication administration) was $129.91 in scenario A, $312.00 in scenario B and $355.91 in scenario C. Nurse preparation and administration in the home would save the oncology health service $124,899 per annum compared to outsourcing medication preparation. Nurse preparation and administration in the home would save the oncology health service $155,329 per annum compared to nurse preparation and administration in the outpatient department. Use of Internet-based video appears to produce savings compared to other methods of administering antibiotics and the technique may have wider application in supporting complex interventions in the home.

Evolution and impact of bacterial drug resistance in the context of cystic fibrosis disease and nosocomial settings

The use of antibiotics is unavoidable in trying to treat acute infections and in the prevention and control of chronic infections. Over the years, an ever increasing number of infections has escalated the use of antibiotics, which has necessitated action against an emerging bacterial resistance. There seems to be a continuous acquisition of new resistance mechanisms among bacteria that switch niches between human, animals, and the environment. An antibiotic resistant strain emerges when it acquires the DNA that confers the added capacity needed to survive in an unusual niche. Once acquired, a new resistance mechanism evolves according to the dynamics of the microenvironment; there is then a high probability that it is transferred to other species or to an avirulent strain of the same species. A well understood model for studying emerging antibiotic resistance and its impact is Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic pathogen which is able to cause acute and chronic infections in nosocomial settings. This bacterium has a huge genetic repertoire consisting of genes that encode both innate and acquired antibiotic resistance traits. Besides acute infections, chronic colonization of P. aeruginosa in the lungs of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients plays a significant role in morbidity and mortality. Antibiotics used in the treatment of such infections has increased the longevity of patients over the last several decades. However, emerging multidrug resistant strains and the eventual increase in the dosage of antibiotic(s) is of major concern. Though there are various infections that are treated by single/combined antibiotics, the particular case of P. aeruginosa infection in CF patients serves as a reference for understanding the impact of overuse of antibiotics and emerging antibiotic resistant strains. This mini review presents the need for judicious use of antibiotics to treat various types of infections, protecting patients and the environment, as well as achieving a better treatment outcome.

Safety for home care: the use of Internet video calls to double-check interventions

Summary

We investigated the feasibility of using Internet video calls for a double check on medication or other complex interventions being administered in the home. Seven nurses were recruited to the study and received training on using laptop and tablet computers with mobile Internet connections. The devices were taken on scheduled home visits to patient homes and video calls with a second clinician were conducted to double-check various items associated with the clinical care of the patient. Over a 14-month period, 88 video calls were conducted during which a total of 600 checks were completed. The items checked included medication names, doses, segmentations on syringes and details of ventilator settings. The quality of the video call was acceptable on 97% of occasions. On three occasions (3%) it was not possible to establish a connection and the double check was not achieved. On every occasion that the video call was successful ( n = 85), nurses were 100% confident that they were able to carry out the full requirements of a double check. The use of Internet video calls is feasible for double-checking and has the potential to improve patient safety and reduce costs.

Home intravenous therapy: Accessibility for Canadian children and youth

The administration of intravenous (IV) therapy at home is an alternative to hospitalization for treatment of infection and a number of other conditions, and has been demonstrated to be effective and safe, to reduce cost and to improve quality of life. While home IV therapy has many advantages for children, it is not uniformly available and access may be limited by age, geographical location and ability to pay. Physicians caring for children need to be aware of the indications for home IV therapy, its requirements and limitations, as well as whether this option is available for children in their care. Where access is limited, physicians should advocate for home IV therapy for children when it is medically indicated.

Extending the course of intravenous antibiotics in adult patients with cystic fibrosis with acute pulmonary exacerbations

Most severe pulmonary exacerbations (PExs) in adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are treated with 2 week of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. At occasions, the treatment is extended. The morbidity and the cost of extending the treatment are considerable. Risk factors and the outcome of extending the course of treatment have not been formally investigated. This was a prospective study. Decision to extend the course of antibiotics was made in patients who were not deemed to have responded to the initial 14 days of treatment. Risk factors examined for extending the course were site of treatment (home or hospital), CF symptom score, body mass index (BMI), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and C-reactive protein (CRP) at days 1 and 14 of the treatment. The following outcome measures were assessed for PExs requiring prolongation of treatment: FEV1, BMI, CF symptom score, CRP and number of days until the following PExs. PExs that were treated with 14 day course were used for comparison. Of all the PExs, 22.9% needed extension of treatment beyond day 14. Compared with PExs needing 14 days of antibiotics, CF symptom score, FEV1 and CRP at day 14 were worse in those who had to have the course extended. Extending the course of IV antibiotics to 21 days improved symptom score, but not any of the other outcome measures, including the number of days until the next PEx. Extending the course beyond 21 days did not result in improvement in any outcome measure. PExs in patients with worse lung disease and greater residual symptoms and lung inflammation at day 14 of antibiotic treatment were associated with the extension of the course of IV antibiotics. Prolonging the treatment to 21 days improved symptoms, but did not result in improvement in any other short-term or lung outcome measures.

Home versus hospital intravenous antibiotic therapy for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Recurrent endobronchial infection in cystic fibrosis requires treatment with intravenous antibiotics for several weeks usually in hospital, affecting health costs and quality of life for patients and their families.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether home intravenous antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis is as effective as inpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy and if it is preferred by individuals or families or both.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 01 September 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled studies of intravenous antibiotic treatment for adults and children with cystic fibrosis at home compared to in hospital.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors independently selected studies for inclusion in the review, assessed methodological quality of each study and extracted data using a standardised form.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen studies were identified by the searches. Only one study could be included which reported results from 17 participants aged 10 to 41 years with an infective exacerbation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All their 31 admissions (18 hospital and 13 at home after two to four days of hospital treatment) were analysed as independent events. Outcomes were measured at 0, 10 and 21 days after initiation of treatment. Home participants underwent fewer investigations than hospital participants (P < 0.002) and general activity was higher in the home group. No significant differences were found for clinical outcomes, adverse events, complications or change of intravenous lines,or time to next admission. Home participants received less low-dose home maintenance antibiotic.Quality of life measures showed no significant differences for dyspnoea and emotional state, but fatigue and mastery were worse for home participants, possibly due to a higher general activity and need of support. Personal, family, sleeping and eating disruptions were less important for home than hospital admissions.Home therapy was cheaper for families and the hospital. Indirect costs were not determined.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence is restricted to a single randomized clinical trial. It suggests that, in the short term, home therapy does not harm individuals, entails fewer investigations, reduces social disruptions and can be cost-effective. There were both advantages and disadvantages in terms of quality of life. The decision to attempt home treatment should be based on the individual situation and appropriate local resources. More research is urgently required.

Factors associated with a shorter time until the next pulmonary exacerbation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis

Time until the subsequent exacerbation (PEx) in cystic fibrosis (CF) is a significant health outcome and one of the significant end points in clinical trials. Risk factors associated with shorter time until the next exacerbation (TUNE) have not been reported. This is a prospective study. TUNE was the number of days from the end of intravenous (IV) antibiotic treatment of a PEx until the day of start of IV antibiotics for the following PEx. Factors assessed were age, gender, site of treatment, CF-related diabetes (CFRD), allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) and infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). In addition, we examined parameters obtained at day 14 of treatment including forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), body mass index, CF respiratory symptom score, C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum cytokines. A total of 170 exacerbations in 58 adult CF patients (27 female), mean (SD) age 25.8 (6.7) years were analysed. When analysing individual variables, patients with lower FEV1, greater symptom score and higher CRP at the end of exacerbation were associated with shorter TUNE. Patients with ABPA and CFRD had a shorter TUNE than those without. When applying multiple regression analysis, factors associated with shorter TUNE were older age and lower day-14 FEV1 values. Shorter periods until the following PEx are expected in older CF patients and those with lower FEV1 at the end of course of treatment. When these risk factors are present, there may be a justification to take therapeutic steps to increase the time until the following PEx.

Hospital versus home treatment of respiratory exacerbations in cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of respiratory exacerbations in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is important in slowing disease progression. The treatment may be given either at home or at the hospital. The aim of our study was to compare both treatment settings.

MATERIAL/METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of 139 treatments in 54 CF patients (age range 12-47 y) treated for respiratory exacerbations at the hospital (n = 84) and/or at home (n = 55). Primary outcomes were improvement in pulmonary function tests (PFTs), weight gain and duration of treatment in relation to treatment setting. Secondary outcomes were these same parameters, but in relation to different clinical preconditions and CF-related complications.

RESULTS

Mean improvement in FEV1 (% predicted) was similar between the hospital and home treatments (14.3 ± 34.4% vs. 14.3 ± 20.2%, respectively; NS), yet treatment duration was significantly shorter at the hospital (9.7 ± 6.7 vs. 16.3 ± 9.1 days, respectively; P < 0.02), especially for patients colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11.1 ± 5.5 vs. 18.0 ± 11.0 days, respectively; p<0.01). At the hospital, a subgroup of patients with CF-related complications improved their FEV1 significantly more than those at home (13.1 ± 19.4% vs. 1.9 ± 14.9%, respectively; P < 0.02), particularly patients with CF-related diabetes mellitus (CFRDM) (11.4 ± 18.7% vs. 1.7 ± 14.6%, respectively; P < 0.05). Patients tended to gain more weight at the hospital compared to home treatment (1.36 ± 4.6 kg and 0.49 ± 3.6 kg respectively; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital treatment for acute respiratory exacerbations in CF may be superior to home treatment, as indicated by a shorter duration of hospitalization, better improvement in FEV1 in patients with CF-related complications, CFRDM in particular and a trend toward better weight gain.

Home intravenous antibiotic treatment for acute pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis - Is it good for the patient?

There is a worldwide drive for the home management of chronic respiratory diseases. With the widespread use of home intravenous (IV) treatment for cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations (PExs), evidence pointing to an inferior outcome of care for home-treated patients in comparison to hospital-treated patients is a cause of concern. Currently, patients who self-administer IV antibiotics at home are provided with equipment and instructions on the use of antibiotics. Policies vary; but in most UK centers, these patients are then followed up by the multidisciplinary team only on days 1, 7 and 14 of the treatment course. We aimed to review the current published literature in search for evidence for the value and the shortfalls of self-administered IV treatment at home for acute PExs in CF patients in comparison to conventional hospital treatment. We searched the electronic database system Medline for published papers regarding studies comparing home- and hospital-based IV antibiotic treatment for both adult and pediatric CF patients. Sixteen studies were identified and grouped into those that showed a similar outcome between home and hospital treatment and those that showed an inferior outcome for home management. Most studies were retrospective or inadequately powered to provide clear answers. Ideally, outcome of care for home treatment should be at least equal to outcome for hospital treatment. Extensive efforts should be made to standardize therapies preserving the advantages of home management and addressing the perceived reasons for an inferior outcome. Until further studies provide definitive answers, treatment at home should be reserved for adequately selected patients and individualized depending on the unique settings of each CF center and specific patients' requirements. There is great need for a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing home and hospital treatments in order to clarify this matter.

Location and duration of treatment of cystic fibrosis respiratory exacerbations do not affect outcomes

RATIONALE

Individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) are subject to recurrent respiratory infections (exacerbations) that often require intravenous antibiotic treatment and may result in permanent loss of lung function. The optimal means of delivering therapy remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether duration or venue of intravenous antibiotic administration affect lung function.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected on 1,535 subjects recruited by the US CF Twin and Sibling Study from US CF care centers between 2000 and 2007.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Long-term decline in FEV₁ after exacerbation was observed regardless of whether antibiotics were administered in the hospital (mean, -3.3 percentage points [95% confidence interval, -3.9 to -2.6]; n = 602 courses of therapy) or at home (mean, -3.5 percentage points [95% confidence interval, -4.5 to -2.5]; n = 232 courses of therapy); this decline was not different by venue using t tests (P = 0.69) or regression (P = 0.91). No difference in intervals between courses of antibiotics was observed between hospital (median, 119 d [interquartile range, 166]; n = 602) and home (median, 98 d [interquartile range, 155]; n = 232) (P = 0.29). Patients with greater drops in FEV₁ with exacerbations had worse long-term decline even if lung function initially recovered with treatment (P < 0.001). Examination of FEV₁ measures obtained during treatment for exacerbations indicated that improvement in FEV₁ plateaus after 7-10 days of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous antibiotic therapy for CF respiratory exacerbations administered in the hospital and in the home was found to be equivalent in terms of long-term FEV₁ change and interval between courses of antibiotics. Optimal duration of therapy (7-10 d) may be shorter than current practice. Large prospective studies are needed to answer these essential questions for CF respiratory management.

Cystic fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis is the most common lethal genetic disease in white populations. The outlook for patients with the disease has improved steadily over many years, largely as a result of earlier diagnosis, more aggressive therapy, and provision of care in specialised centres. Researchers now have a more complete understanding of the molecular-biological defect that underlies cystic fibrosis, which is leading to new approaches to treatment. One of these treatments, hypertonic saline, is already in use, whereas others are in advanced stages of development. We review clinical care for cystic fibrosis and discuss recent advances in the understanding of its pathogenesis, implementation of screening of neonates, and development of therapies aimed at treating the basic defect.

Effectiveness of home treatment for patients with cystic fibrosis: the intravenous administration of antibiotics to treat respiratory infections

Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) experience repeated infectious respiratory exacerbations leading to a continuous decline in lung function. The exacerbations are treated in hospital or at home. Our aim was to compare the clinical outcome for patients undergoing intravenous antibiotic treatment either in hospital or at home. A retrospective 10-year study was performed in four regional CF Centers. The outcome measures were percentage changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), forced vital capacity (FVC) and weight for age z-score (WZS). FEV(1), FVC, and WZS changes were calculated for the entire study period and for each course. A total of 1,164 courses were analyzed. For each course, the mean improvement in FEV(1) and FVC was significantly higher when performed in hospital than when performed at home (P < 0.05). FEV(1) and FVC values were 10.2%, 9.5% respectively in the hospital group and 7.3%, 6.8% in the home group. A total of 153 patients were analyzed (51 inpatients matched to 102 patients treated at home). The two groups had no significant differences in any outcome variable at baseline. The mean variation per year in FEV(1) was greater in the hospital group versus the home group (-0.4% vs. -1.8%; P = 0.03). The mean variation per year in WZS was greater in the hospital group versus the home group (P < 0.01). Clinical outcome, as defined by spirometric parameters and body weight, was better after a course of treatment in hospital than after a home treatment. This benefit was maintained throughout of the study period.

Home intravenous antibiotics for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Recurrent endobronchial infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) requires treatment with intravenous antibiotics for several weeks usually in hospital, affecting health costs and quality of life for patients and their families.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether home intravenous antibiotic therapy in CF is as effective as inpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy and if it is preferred by individuals or families or both.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: April 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled studies of intravenous antibiotic treatment for adults and children with CF at home compared to in hospital.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors independently selected studies for inclusion in the review, assessed methodological quality of each study and extracted data using a standardised form.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen studies were identified by the searches. Only one study could be included which reported results from 17 participants aged 10 to 41 years with an infective exacerbation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All their 31 admissions (18 hospital and 13 at home after two to four days of hospital treatment) were analysed as independent events. Outcomes were measured at 0, 10 and 21 days after initiation of treatment. Home participants underwent fewer investigations than hospital participants (P < 0.002) and general activity was higher in the home group. No significant differences were found for clinical outcomes, adverse events, complications or change of intravenous lines,or time to next admission. Home participants received less low-dose home maintenance antibiotic. Quality of life measures showed no significant differences for dyspnoea and emotional state, but fatigue and mastery were worse for home participants, possibly due to a higher general activity and need of support. Personal, family, sleeping and eating disruptions were less important for home than hospital admissions. Home therapy was cheaper for families and the hospital. Indirect costs were not determined.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence is restricted to a single randomized clinical trial. It suggests that, in the short term, home therapy does not harm individuals, entails fewer investigations, reduces social disruptions and can be cost-effective. There were both advantages and disadvantages in terms of quality of life. The decision to attempt home treatment should be based on the individual situation and appropriate local resources. More research is urgently required.

Effects of lung transplantation on inpatient end of life care in cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

The impact of lung transplantation on end of life care in cystic fibrosis (CF) has not been widely investigated.

METHODS

Information about end of life care was collected from records of all patients who died in our hospital from complications of CF between 1995 and 2005. Transplant and non-transplant patients were compared.

RESULTS

Of 38 patients who died, 20 (53%) had received or were awaiting lung transplantation ("transplant" group), and 18 (47%) were not referred, declined transplant, or were removed from the waiting list ("non-transplant"). Transplant patients were more likely than non-transplant patients to die in the intensive care unit (17 (85%) versus 9 (50%); P=0.04). 16 (80%) transplant patients remained intubated at or shortly before death, versus 7 (39%) non-transplant patients (P=0.02). Do-not-resuscitate orders were written later for transplant patients; 12 (60%) on the day of death versus 5 (28%) in non-transplant patients (P=0.02). Transplant patients were less likely to participate in this decision. Alternatives to hospital death were rarely discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Receiving or awaiting lung transplantation affords more aggressive inpatient end of life care. Despite the chronic nature of CF and knowledge of a shortened life span, discussions about terminal care are often delayed until patients themselves are unable to participate.