Dupilumab for chronic eosinophilic pneumonia

Feasibility of continued treatment with dupilumab in patients with type 2 inflammatory disease who developed eosinophilic pneumonia: 3 case reports

Several reports have described dupilumab-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) after treatment with dupilumab in patients with type 2 inflammatory disease. Other reports have suggested the efficacy of dupilumab for chronic EP (CEP). Whether dupilumab can be continued in patients with type 2 inflammatory disease who develop EP during dupilumab treatment remains unclear. We present herein three cases with different clinical presentations involving dupilumab and EP. In Case 1, dupilumab was discontinued because of dupilumab-induced EP during the treatment of asthma. In Case 2, although pre-existing idiopathic EP worsened during the treatment of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS), dupilumab was continued. In Case 3, CEP and ECRS were successfully treated with dupilumab and corticosteroids were discontinued. In conclusion, treatment with dupilumab in patients with type 2 inflammatory disease and idiopathic EP is worth considering if the benefits are deemed to outweigh the risks and careful attention is given to the clinical course.

Monoclonal antibodies in idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) is a rare disease characterized by pulmonary radiological alterations, peripheral eosinophilia, and demonstrated pulmonary eosinophilia. Oral steroids (OSs) are the standard management, but relapses occur in up to 50% of patients during the decrease or suspension of steroids, usually requiring reinitiation of treatment, exposing patients to secondary events derived from the management. Management with monoclonal antibodies has been proposed in these cases to control the disease and limit the secondary effects. The objective is to describe the extent and type of evidence regarding the use of monoclonal antibodies for ICEP.

METHODS

A panoramic review of the literature was performed. Observational and experimental studies of pediatric and adult populations that managed recurrent ICEP with monoclonal antibodies were included. Data search, selection, and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

937 studies were found. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 titles remained for the final analysis: a retrospective, observational, real-life study, two case series publications, and 34 case reports published in academic poster sessions and letters to the editor. In general, the use of monoclonal antibodies approved for severe asthma could be useful for the control of ICEP, since most of the results show a good response for clinical and radiological outcomes. Biological drugs seem to be a safer option for controlling relapses in ICEP, allowing lowering/suspension of OSs, and sometimes replacing them in patients intolerant to them, patients with significant comorbidities, and patients who have already developed adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The extent of the evidence supporting management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies against IL-5 and IgE (omalizumab) is limited, but it could be promising in patients who present frequent relapses, in cortico-dependent individuals, or in patients in whom the use of steroids is contraindicated. The extent of the evidence for management with dupilumab is more limited. Studies with better design and structure are needed to evaluate quality of life and outcomes during a clear follow-up period. To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review of the literature showing the extent of the evidence for the management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies.

Dupilumab and the potential risk of eosinophilic pneumonia: case report, literature review, and FAERS database analysis

Eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is a rare but noteworthy adverse effect linked to dupilumab, an interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 inhibitor used in the managing atopic diseases. The underlying mechanisms, potential predisposing factors, clinical characteristics, and optimal management strategies for dupilumab-induced EP remain unclear. We report a 71-year-old patient who developed acute EP after the first 600-mg dose of dupilumab. Eosinophils (EOSs) were also transiently increased (up to 1,600 cells/μl). After the acute EP was effectively treated with glucocorticoids, dupilumab treatment was continued. Rash, itching, and immunoglobulin E levels continued to decrease in the patient, and no further pulmonary adverse events occurred. We combined this case with a literature review of nine articles and analyzed data from 93 cases reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database of patients developing EP after dupilumab use. Our findings imply that dupilumab may induce EP, particularly in individuals over 45 years old, those with a history of respiratory diseases, and those who have previously used inhaled or systemic steroids. Vigilance is required, especially when there is a persistent elevation in peripheral blood EOSs during treatment. Although steroid treatment can effectively manage EP, more data are needed to determine the safety of resuming dupilumab treatment after controlling pneumonia.

Reverse butterfly pattern image with eosinophilia: Effective treatment with benralizumab-A case report

A 16-year-old adolescent presented with dry cough, fever, weight loss, night sweats, exercise intolerance, and eosinophilia. Computed tomography showed consolidations with "reverse butterfly" pattern. He responded well to corticosteroids but had frequent relapses. He became steroid dependent and developed steroid related morbidity. Benralizumab was prescribed with complete resolution of eosinophilia and lung infiltrates with no adverse effect.